DOREMUS & FRBRoo An update on DOREMUS today and an opinion on the future of FRBRoo.

Transcription

1 DOREMUS & FRBRoo An update on DOREMUS today and an opinion on the future of FRBRoo CRM SIG meeting Berlin, December

2 DOREMUS, a short intro 3-year research project 3 cultural heritage institutions + labs Enriching catalogues, publishing as LOD Creating a model, controlled vocabularies, tools Concentrating on complex musics, which other models cannot describe (Music Ontology) 2

3 DOREMUS, a short intro Links :

4 The DOREMUS model CIDOC-CRM (musées) FRBR (bibliothèques) FRBRoo DOREMUS 4

5 The DOREMUS model F14 Individual A simplified representation of a FRBRoo process from work to publication, through performance and recording. F29 Event F21 Performance Plan F20 Performan F25 Performan Plan F31 Performanc F26 F30 Event F19 F24 Performance 5

6 The DOREMUS model Rappel de la demande : 1 notices bibliographiques sélectionnées. Notice bibliographique Forme : Format : Notices complètes sans exemplaire Intermarc n0 m g 001 FRBNF s frzxx b ge x 1 kz $e EMI classics $a $c Boite $d PM $a $g b $f c $a ka $ $w.0..b... $a Beethoven $m Ludwig van $d $ $ $w...b.fre. $a Sonates $b Piano $p Op. 13 $t Do mineur $a Sonate n 8, op 13 "Pathétique" $d Enregistrement sonore $b Sonate n 14, op 27 "Clair de lune" $b Sonate n 23, op 57 "Appassionata" $f Beethoven $j Daniel Barenboïm, p $a Issy-les-Moulineaux $c EMI music France $a St Ouen l'aumone $c distrib. EMI music France $d 1991 (DL) $a 1 cass audio $c Dolby, Cr02 $e [1] f de dépl $a London : prod. EMI records Ltd, P $p gb $a Londres $d $a Notice / Roubinet, Michel $a $b $ $w.0..b... $a Beethoven $m Ludwig van $d $2 01 $ $ $w.0..b... $a Beethoven $m Ludwig van $d $2 02 $ $ $w 0 b $a Barenboim $m Daniel $d $ $ $w b $a EMI classics $ $w 0 b $a EMI music France $ $ $w 0 b $a EMI music France $ $ $w 20 b $a EMI records Ltd $ $ $w...b.fre. $a Sonates $b Piano $p Op. 57 $t Fa mineur $ $ $w...b.fre. $a Sonates $b Piano $p Op. 27, no 2 $t Do dièse mineur $ $a Sonate n 14, op 27 "Clair de lune" $a Sonate n 23, op 57 "Appassionata" $o OPC $a Performance 6

7 The DOREMUS model Created 45 classes, 65 properties More coming with Manifestation modelling Validation by IFLA in 2017? Future : a core model + modules 7

8 The DOREMUS model Performed s s, not s Properties rather than Classes 8

9 The performance in FRBRoo Event performed Performance In FRBRoo, a performance does not create any : it just performs an existing. Individual Performance Individual Performance > What if there is no preexisting? (typically : traditional music) > What if the performance only uses the as a material for a new creation? (typically : jazz music) 9

10 The performance in FRBRoo Event Performance Individual Performance Individual Performance Sometimes a performance can create an! We want to be able to describe the result of the Performance. 10

11 The performance in FRBRoo Sub-class of Performance and of Event Performed created Performed Titre Individual Performance Individual Performance Genre The event Performed is a performance creating a Performed. 11 Key

12 The performance in FRBRoo is performed expression of Event used specific object Performed created Performed Titre Individual Performance Individual Performance Genre The reation of a new Performed can use a preexisting material (jazz). Key

13 Using s, not s Time-Span Event Details of the Titre Sonate au clair de lune 1801 created Titre Quasi una fantasia Place consists of Genre Sonate Vienne Activity Key Ut dièse mineur Actor Function Order Number 14 Beethoven, Ludwig van Compositeur 13

14 Using Properties, rather than Classes P1 is identified by Opus Statement P106 is composed of Opus Number 27 P106 is composed of Opus Subnr 2 U17_has_opus_statement Opus Statement U42_has_opus_number Opus Number 27 U43_has_opus_subnumber Opus Subnr 2 14

15 Using Properties, rather than Classes P1 is identified by P106 is composed of 27 Opus Statement P106 is composed of 2 U17_has_opus_statement U42_has_opus_number 27 Opus Statement U43_has_opus_subnumber 2 15

16 FRBRoo, a feedback Need for learning tools Library-oriented Difficult for FRBRians Confusion created by FRBRer Graphic representation misleading Some confusing concepts in FRBRoo LRM-izing s? 16

17 FRBRoo, a feedback Need for learning tools Need for some primer, or FRBRoo 101. We cannot immerse newcomers in FRBRoo like lobsters in boiling water! 17

18 FRBRoo, a feedback Need for learning tools We also need deep-dive material on non-obvious modelling solutions. e.g. how do we model aggregations? 18

19 FRBRoo, a feedback A library-oriented model CRM is very high-level FRBRoo is more library-oriented Not all potential users are libraries Some very specific concepts could be part of a separate module 19

20 FRBRoo, a feedback Difficult for FRBRians? FRBRoo is not a translation of FRBRer Some concepts are interpreted differently Some are developped, e.g. Manifestion is represented in F3 Manifestation Product Type and in F24. 20

21 FRBRoo, a feedback Reproducing the FRBRer confusion? FRBRer created some confusion, especially as concerns the notion of. This confusion can be found also in FRBRoo. 21

22 FRBRoo, a feedback Graphic representation misleading? When people say FRBRoo is complex, they often refer to what they understood from the graphical representation of the model. 22

23 FRBRoo, a feedback Graphic representation misleading? has genre Genre is identified by Linguistic Appellation has language sonate Language FR 23

24 FRBRoo, a feedback Graphic representation misleading? has genre Genre is identified by Linguistic Appellation has language sonate Language efrbroo:_ained_ FR 24

25 FRBRoo, a feedback Graphic representation misleading? has genre Genre is identified by Linguistic Appellation has language sonate Language efrbroo:_ained_ FR mus:u12_has_genre 25

26 FRBRoo, a feedback Graphic representation misleading? has genre Genre is identified by Linguistic Appellation has language sonate Language efrbroo:_ained_ mus:u12_has_genre FR 26

27 FRBRoo, a feedback Graphic representation misleading? has genre Genre is identified by Linguistic Appellation has language sonate Language efrbroo:_ained_ mus:u12_has_genre FR has genre 27

28 FRBRoo, a feedback LRM-izing FRBRoo? Probably the greatest source of confusion in FRBR and consequently in FRBRoo is the concept of. 28

29 FRBRoo, a feedback LRM-izing FRBRoo? F14 F21 Individual F29 Event F26 F20 Performan F19 F30 Performance Plan F25 Event Performan Plan F24 F31 Performanc Performance 29

30 R10 has member F15 Complex R10 has member F14 Individual F29 Event F21 Performance Plan F20 Performan F25 Performan Plan F31 Performanc F26 F30 Event F19 F24 Performance 30

31 R10 has member F15 Complex R10 has member F14 Individual R3 is realised in F29 Event F21 Performance Plan F20 Performan F25 Performan Plan F31 Performanc F26 F30 Event F19 F24 Performance 31

32 Do we need s? What is a anyhow? LRM-E2 : A is an abstract entity that permits the identification of the commonality of content between and among various s. LRM-E2 : A comes into existence simultaneously with the creation of its first, no can exist without there being at least one of the. LRM-E2 : User needs are the basis for determining whether instances of s are considered to belong to the same instance of. 32

33 Do we need s? s in FRBR-LRM and FRBRoo FRBRoo : F1 F14 Individual F15 Complex F16 Container F17 Aggregation F18 Serial F19 F20 Performance F21 33

34 Do we need s? s in FRBR-LRM and FRBRoo FRBRoo : F1 F14 Individual F15 Complex F16 Container F17 Aggregation F18 Serial F19 F20 Performance F21 Linked to one and only one What commonality of content does a identify when it is linked to one and only one by definition? 34

35 Do we need s? s in FRBR-LRM and FRBRoo FRBRoo : F1 F14 Individual F15 Complex F16 Container F17 Aggregation F18 Serial F19 F20 Performance F21 A possible equivalent of in LRM The only FRBRoo class nearing the commonality of content in FRBRoo is F15 Complex. But it states a dominance of concept. 35

36 back to our initial schema : R10 has member F15 Complex R10 has member F14 Individual R3 is realised in F29 Event F21 Performance Plan F20 Performan F25 Performan Plan F31 Performanc F26 F30 Event F19 F24 Performance 36

37 and now without the unnecessary s: F15 Complex R3 is realised in F29 Event F26 Performance Plan F25 Performan Plan Performance F31 Performanc 37 F30 Event F24

38 Do we need all these s? What about relationships expressed at the level? Some relationships are expressed at the level : F1 R1 is logical successor of F1 F1 R2 is derivative of F1 38

39 Do we need all these s? What about relationships expressed at the level? Derivations of a work R10 has member Mussorgsky s Pictures at an Exhibition F15 Complex R10 has member F14 Individual R2 is derivative of F14 Individual R3 is realised in R40 has representative expression Ravel s Pictures at an Exhibition Mussorgsky s Pictures at an Exhibition Remember the F14 is realised in one and only one 39

40 Do we need all these s? What about relationships expressed at the level? Derivations of a work Mussorgsky s Pictures at an Exhibition F15 Complex R3 is realised in R40 has representative expression R2 is derivative of Ravel s Pictures at an Exhibition Mussorgsky s Pictures at an Exhibition 40 Alternatively : Rxx is derivated expression of

41 Derivations of a work Do we need all these s? What about relationships expressed at the level? F15 Complex R2 is derivative of Mussorgsky s Pictures at an Exhibition F15 Complex Ravel s Pictures at an Exhibition R40 has representative expression R40 has representative expression Rxx is derivated expression of Ravel s Pictures at an Exhibition Mussorgsky s Pictures at an Exhibition Describing it the French way 41

42 Do we need all these s? What about relationships expressed at the level? Logical succession R10 has member F15 Complex R10 has member F14 Individual R1 is logical successor of F14 Individual R3 is realised in R40 has representative expression 42

43 Do we need all these s? What about relationships expressed at the level? Logical succession F15 Complex R40 has representative expression R3 is realised in Rxx is logical successor of Note : in the case of the Star Wars Trilogies, we would still use R1 is logical successor of between two F15 Complex. 43

44 Do we need all these s? What about relationships expressed at the level? Parts of a work R10 has member F15 Complex F14 Individual F14 Individual R3 is realised in P148 has component F14 Individual 44

45 Do we need all these s? What about relationships expressed at the level? Parts of a work R10 has member F15 Complex F14 Individual F14 Individual R3 is realised in R5 has component P148 has component F14 Individual 45

46 Do we need all these s? What about relationships expressed at the level? Parts of a work F15 Complex R3 is realised in R5 has component 46

47 Thank you! Any Question? 47