Flexible Permitting. James F. Adair, PE Sealed Air Corporation. January 25, Prepared for: Flexible Packaging Association Environmental Summit
|
|
- Robert Reed
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Flexible Permitting James F. Adair, PE Sealed Air Corporation January 25, 2007 Prepared for: Flexible Packaging Association Environmental Summit 1
2 Background Initial regulations Late 1970s Court ordered changes 1980 In the early 1990s, EPA and stakeholders embarked on an effort to simplify NSR Not until July 23, 1996 did EPA propose NSR changes (61 Fed. Reg ) Reform initiative lay dormant until 2002 What is Flexible Permitting?! Any of the five NSR Reform options! Published December 31, 2002! Applicable in delegated States March
3 Flexible Permitting NSR Reform (67 FR 80186)! Baseline Actual Emissions! Actual-to to-projected Actual Applicability Test! Plantwide Applicability Limitations (PALs( PALs)! Clean Unit Applicability Test - VACATED! Pollution Control Project (PCP) Exclusion - VACATED Proposed Rules! Routine Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement (RMRR) - Vacated by US Court of Appeals! Debottlenecking,, Aggregation, and Allowables PALs 3
4 Flexible Permitting Major Modification is the centerpiece to both NSR Enforcement and Reforms Historic and still current (in most of U.S.) definition of major modification: Any physical change in or change in the method of operation of an existing major source that would result in a significant net emissions increase of any pollutant subject to regulation under the CAA 4
5 Reality Check The push from States and industry to reform NSR had been to! Simplify NSR requirements! Remove NSR implications from activities meant to improve operations of a unit. Streamlining was the lofty goal. Industry wanted some certainty or at least some assurances in making regulatory decisions. 5
6 Reality Check NSR Reform regulations simplify nothing! Determinations of past actuals Choosing the time period Having sufficient records to verify Determining future projected actuals No up front agency review (liability concerns) Verification (monitoring, recordkeeping, etc. sufficient to prove compliance upon request) Certainty now consists of regulatory agencies reviewing industry decisions after the fact. Some of the assurances carry liability issues 6
7 Reality Check Everything in Reform Regulations addresses Applicability issues. Nothing has changed about requirements once you are in the program. Consultants are the real winners in this. Enforcement Officers have been given lifetime job security. 7
8 Clean Unit Exemption - VACATED On June 24, 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals vacated the Clean Unit Exemption of the NSR rule, citing that the US EPA lacked proper Congressional authorization to create an exemption of this type. The Clean Unit Exemption would have let an emission unit with state-of-the-art emission controls to use a permitted allowable-to-permitted allowable emissions test to determine whether a proposed project would be a major modification. A source could rely on Clean Unit Status for 10 years from the date when the unit was determined to have installed or have state-of-the-art control. 8
9 Exclusion for Pollution Control Projects (PCP) - VACATED On June 24, 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals also vacated the Pollution Control Project provisions of the NSR Reform Rule, citing that Congress never intended for US EPA to create an exemption of this type. The PCP exclusion would have allowed a project that reduced emission of one or more regulated pollutants to avoid status as a major modification despite a collateral significant emissions increase for other pollutant(s). The PCP exclusion only applied to projects for existing emission units, not to installation of new units. 9
10 Equipment Replacement Provision The US Court of Appeals unanimously vacated the Equipment Replacement Provision, citing that it is contrary to the plain language of the CAA. An activity (or aggregation of activities) would fall under the Routine Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement (RMR&R) exclusion if:! It involves replacement of any existing component(s) of a process unit with identical or functionally equivalent components;! The fixed capital costs of the replaced component(s) plus the costs of activities that are part of the replacement effort do not exceed 20% of the current replacement value of the process unit; and! The replacement component(s) does not alter the basic design parameters of the process unit or cause the process unit to exceed any legally enforceable emission or emission-constraining operational limitations applicable to the process unit 10
11 Long Term Status All 3 are worth fighting for: Significant advantages over the current regulations. Additional flexibility that industry otherwise does not have. Additional operational latitude in the case of the RMRR US EPA will have to amend the original proposals to comply with the court s comments, which will probably mean new proposals altogether. 11
12 Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs) It sure would be nice to have a PAL 12
13 Plantwide Applicability Limits What is a PAL? PALs,, as defined in 40 CFR Part 52, are:! Set using actual facility baseline emissions! Pollutant-specific! Issued for a 10-year term (renewal at 5-year) 5! Renewable An annual, facility-wide, pollutant specific, emission limitation under which the facility can make any changes without triggering PSD for that pollutant 13
14 Plantwide Applicability Limitations A PAL is an annual (facility-wide) emission limitation (12-month total, rolled monthly) under which the facility can make any change without triggering NSR review for that pollutant.! Pollutant-specific! 10-year term Can be used in non-attainment areas. A separate PAL permit is required for each pollutant (e.g., a PAL for combined VOC and NOx emissions is not allowed). EPA is considering Allowables PALs??? 14
15 PAL Permits Other Features An alternative approach for determining major NSR applicability. A PAL permit provides an emissions cap or caps for an industrial facility. The cap provides a clear method for determining whether changes at a PAL- covered facility trigger NSR permitting requirements.! The need to obtain an NSR permit revision only applies when a facility s emissions increase beyond the PAL cap.! In addition to the cap, a PAL or PAL-type permit can specify certain kinds of facility changes that are pre- approved. A facility with a PAL can undertake a pre- approved change without becoming subject to NSR as long as the facility s emissions remain below the cap(s). 15
16 PAL Permits Environmental Benefits Enhanced Public Participation / Transparency PAL emissions caps provide certainty regarding the emissions impact of a facility. PAL caps typically entail emission reductions compared to traditional permitting approaches. Emissions caps provide a very powerful incentive for pollution prevention. PALs allow facility environmental engineers to spend more time to concentrate on reducing emissions through pollution prevention. 16
17 PAL Permits Operational Benefits Facility changes are not dictated by major PSD concerns Operational Flexibility! Construction Permitting! Process Optimization Opportunity! Pollution Prevention / Improved Pollution Control! Relocation Clean Slate Non-Attainment Hedge 17
18 PAL Permits Operational Benefits Smarter use of control devices. Flexibility to control sources and maximize the capacity of control devices. Example: A little-used press is connected to an oxidizer because of a PSD Avoidance condition. With a PAL, the press could be disconnected and replaced with a much higher use press Flexibility to move or shift sources. 18
19 PAL Permits How does a facility obtain a PAL?! Existing major stationary sources can submit an application specifically requesting a PAL or PALs! Application requirements include:! Listing of all emissions units regardless of size! All Federal/State applicable requirements! Emission limits/work practice requirements! Baseline actual emissions! Supporting documentation! PAL calculation procedures / methodology! Monitoring requirements! Record retention requirements! Reporting requirements! Other necessary requirements (State and Region) 19
20 Plantwide Applicability Limits Application Requirements List of Emission Units (cross-referenced referenced to Title V) Baseline Emission Determination with calculations! Includes fugitives estimates Detailed description of the method for calculating emissions Detailed description of the calculation procedures Description of Public Participation CAM Plan or Equivalent! Continuous Parameter Monitoring (CPMS)! Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEMS)! Predictive Emission Monitoring (PEMS) 20
21 Plantwide Applicability Limits PAL Permit Submission The permitting requirements are extensive.! Supporting documentation required includes most of the information provided for annual emission inventory.! The documentation requirements include absolutely every emission source for the PAL pollutant(s).! Justification for ALL emissions, including insignificant activities and fugitives. The packet that will go to public notice will probably be a couple hundred pages long. 21
22 Plantwide Applicability Limits Title V Renewal Options Is it a good idea to submit the PAL application with the Title V Renewal?! Benefits to the permittee!many overlapping permitting requirements!terms can coincide!cam Plan serves for both! State agency would prefer to process them simultaneously, if possible.! Suggest to submit them separately but concurrently. 22
23 Plantwide Applicability Limits Secrets Meet with the State beforehand Understand the EPA Region s position on PALs Understand the EPA Region s relationship with the State Outline the permitting before involving the Region Take a look at the Texas regulations Look at Minnesota s PAL Form! Step-by by-step methodology! Deals with Insignificant Activities! Good examples! Use it if your state has no PAL Form 23
24 Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs) Will you be my PAL? 24
25 Establishing a PAL How are PAL levels established?! Establish baseline emissions - select any consecutive 24-month period within the 10-year period preceding the PAL!Only one 24-month period may be used per pollutant!differing baseline periods may be used for different pollutants! Identify all emission units that were included in the baseline period! Identify any emissions units constructed since the baseline period 25
26 Establishing a PAL How are PAL levels established? (cont.)!for each emissions unit that existed during the baseline period:!calculate the average rate,, in tons per year, at which each of the emissions units emitted the PAL pollutant!sum the baseline actual PAL pollutant emission rates of each emissions unit at the source 26
27 Establishing a PAL How are PAL levels established? (cont.)! Subtract baseline PAL pollutant emissions associated with emissions units that have been permanently shut down since the baseline period! Shutdowns of more than 2 years or that have resulted in the removal of the source from the State s inventory are presumed to be permanent! Add potential PAL pollutant emissions from units from which construction began after the baseline period! Add the pollutant-specific significant emissions rate (40 TPY for VOCs) to the emissions calculated as described above 27
28 Establishing a PAL How are PAL levels established? (cont.)!baseline PAL pollutant emissions cannot exceed emission limits allowed by your permit or newly applicable requirements at the time the PAL is set!adjust baseline PAL pollutants to reflect applicable requirements since the baseline period!ract, NSPS, BACT, LAER, MACT, etc. 28
29 Establishing a PAL Example Baseline PAL 3 units 50 tpy actual VOC emissions each during baseline period. 1 unit shutdown since then. Hence PAL level = * - 50 = 140 tpy. Any change not subject to major NSR if plantwide emissions remain below 140 tpy VOC. * 40 tpy is significant emissions rate for VOC 29
30 Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs) Take my PAL, please Or When a good PAL goes bad 30
31 Plantwide Applicability Limits What happens when the facility opts out of the PAL?! The source shall submit a proposed allocation of emission limits for all sources in the facility. The agency will then issue a new permit with individual limits on each source.! Pre-PAL PAL limits will not be considered when making these decisions. Grandfathered sources might have to relinquish their exempt status. For example, during the PAL period, one or more sources may have been tied to pollution control devices. It may benefit the facility to take credit for these controlled sources.! PAL division will and must be a cooperative process. 31
32 PAL Permits How can PAL levels be increased?! An application for a PAL increase is required that:! Identifies all emissions units contributing to the increase! Demonstrates a PAL exceedance after inclusion of proposed new/modified emissions units and an assumption of current BACT equivalent controls on all units! A major PSD permit is required for emissions units associated with the increase, regardless of the magnitude of the emissions increase! Facility must comply with any resulting BACT/LAER requirements 32
33 PAL Permits How is the higher PAL determined?! The regulatory authority establishes a higher PAL level based on:! The sum of the allowable emissions from new/modified emissions units - PLUS -! The sum of the baseline actual emissions from all significant/major emissions units assuming BACT control - PLUS -! The sum of baseline actual emissions from small emissions units! The end result - the magnitude of the proposed increase is minimized by the potential PAL decreases by assuming BACT control on significant and major emissions units 33
34 Reopening PAL Permits Can PALs be re-opened by the regulatory authority?! Yes - mandatory reopening of PAL permits to:!correct typographical or calculation errors made in setting the PAL.!Reduce the PAL to create emissions reductions for offset purposes.!revise the PAL to reflect an increase in the PAL. 34
35 Reopening PAL Permits Reviewing authority may reopen the PAL permit to: Reduce the PAL to reflect newly applicable federal requirements with compliance dates after the PAL effective date. (However, PAL must be adjusted at title V or PAL permit renewal, whichever occurs first.) Reduce the PAL consistent with any other requirement that the reviewing authority may impose under its SIP. Reduce the PAL if it determines that a reduction is necessary to avoid causing or contributing to a NAAQS or PSD increment violation. 35
36 Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs) You re not my PAL anymore 36
37 Plantwide Applicability Limits PAL Permit Renewal The simplest option would be to renew the PAL! Submit renewal application.! The reviewing authority shall provide a written rationale for the proposed PAL level for public comment. PAL renewal adjustments:! The new PAL may not exceed the facility PTE! New PAL cannot exceed original PAL level unless undergoing PAL modification (increase) procedure! The PAL must reflect all requirements that became applicable during PAL term 37
38 Plantwide Applicability Limits PAL Permit Renewal Are PALs adjusted when they are renewed?! Yes PALs are evaluated at renewal using the same process used to set the original PALs! If the new PAL level is > or = 80% of existing PAL level, PAL may be reset at original level! The reviewing authority has discretion in setting a new PAL level to :! Be more representative of actual emissions! Be in accordance with local air quality needs! Accommodate anticipated economic growth! Represent advances in air pollution control technology 38
39 PAL Renewal At least 6 months prior to but not earlier than 18 months from PAL expiration date, the owner must submit an application for renewal or expiration. The reviewing authority shall provide a written rationale for the proposed PAL level for public comment. The new PAL level can not be higher than the existing PAL (unless PAL increase provisions are met) or the PTE of the source. 39
40 Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs) I don t want to play with my PAL anymore 40
41 Plantwide Applicability Limits PAL Permit Expiration Do PALs/PAL permits expire?! Yes PALs/PAL permits not renewed expire at the end of their effective period (10 years) Expiration Option: Exit the PAL! Submit application for PAL expiration! The default position is that the PAL will be distributed evenly among all of the sources.! Within the timeframe specified for PAL renewals, the facility shall submit a proposed allocation of the PAL to each emissions unit. The reviewing authority shall decide whether and how the PAL will be distributed and issue a revised permit incorporating allowable limits l for each emissions unit.! Any subsequent physical or operational change at the source will be subject to major NSR review. 41
42 Plantwide Applicability Limits PAL Permit Expiration What happens if a PAL is allowed to expire?! New emission limits are established!source proposes distribution of PAL emissions to each emissions unit that existed under the PAL!The reviewing authority decides the ultimate distribution of PAL emissions to emissions units 42
43 Plantwide Applicability Limits PAL Permit Expiration PAL emissions are distributed to individual emissions units if the PAL expires Emissions Unit A B C D E G PAL Level (tons) 255 Emissions at PAL Expiration (tpy) In this example, emissions were apportioned to individual emissions units at PAL expiration based on the distribution of emissions during the baseline period 43
44 Plantwide Applicability Limits PAL Permit Expiration PAL Expiration Notes! Compliance with new enforceable tpy limits is based on a 12-month rolling basis! Required monitoring systems may be similar to those under PALs! Compliance with a site-wide emissions cap, equivalent to the previous PAL, is required until a revised permit is issued! Physical changes or changes in the method of operation are subject to major NSR if change is a major modification! State or federal requirements (BACT, LAER, RACT, NSPS, MACT, etc.) remain applicable 44
45 Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs) Keeping up with my PAL 45
46 PAL Monitoring PAL general monitoring requirements specify that:! PAL monitoring systems must be based on sound science! Must meet minimum legal requirements for admissibility in a judicial proceeding to enforce the PAL permit! Emissions must be quantifiable on an ongoing basis 46
47 PAL Monitoring PAL permit must contain enforceable requirements to determine plantwide emissions (12-month total, rolled monthly). A source may use any of the following approaches:! Mass Balance Calculations! For sources using paints, coatings, and solvents! Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS)! Continuous Parameter Monitoring Systems (CPMS)! Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems (PEMS)! Emission Factors! Alternative methods as approved by the administrator 47
48 PAL Monitoring If no monitoring data exist for an emissions unit for a time period, the source owner must report the maximum potential emissions. Where an owner cannot demonstrate a correlation between the monitored parameter(s) and the PAL pollutant emissions rate at all operating points of an emissions unit, the reviewing authority shall at the time of permit issuance: Establish default value(s) for determining compliance with the PAL based on the highest potential emissions reasonably estimated at such operating points; or Determine that the operation of the emissions unit in the absence of a correlation is a violation of the PAL. 48
49 Recordkeeping/Reporting The PAL permit shall require the owner to maintain the following records for the duration of the PAL effective period plus 5 years:! A copy of the PAL permit application and any applications for revisions to the PAL; and! Each annual certification of compliance pursuant to title V and the data relied on in certifying the compliance. The owner shall submit semi-annual monitoring reports and prompt deviation reports to the reviewing authority in accordance with the applicable title V permitting program. 49
50 Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs) The Secret Life of a PAL 50
51 Plantwide Applicability Limits Hidden Benefits Do you have an older facility that has numerous PSD Avoidance conditions?! A PAL is a way to simplify or eliminate PSD Avoidance conditions without going through formal PSD! It s comparatively easy when compared to PSD, and there is no construction tied to the permitting. It s an alternative to PSD with added benefits.! These PSD Avoidance conditions can be rolled up into the PAL.! And after the term of the PAL, the old limits are no longer operative. That might have tremendous value. 51
52 Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs) Do I really want a PAL? 52
53 Plantwide Applicability Limits Summary of Considerations Critical decision point rests on future plans for the facility. PALs can give facilities great permitting and operational flexibility. State minor modification permitting rules can affect decision Area Non-attainment status is also an important consideration. 53
54 Plantwide Applicability Limits Decision Considerations Strategy for setting the PAL level needs to be carefully considered. The future direction of the facility is critically important.! A facility planning to replace grandfathered sources is an ideal candidate for a PAL.! A facility getting smaller is an ideal candidate for a PAL.! A facility planning no additions/expansions is only going to receive limited benefits (simplified permit).! A facility with unknown plans for the future is a questionable candidate.! A facility planning to expand with units that will increase the total pollutant emissions is a poor candidate. 54
55 Plantwide Applicability Limits When is a PAL bad? When is a PAL a bad idea?! When there is already sufficient flexibility.! If increased data collection, validation, and reporting is going to be unacceptable.! PALs can place severe restrictions on large-scale expansions.! When enforceability is an issue or when emissions cannot be readily estimated.! They will take longer than other types of permits, at least for the foreseeable future.! Permitting time and/or costs are higher. 55
56 Plantwide Applicability Limits Reality Check Consider monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, and testing requirements carefully! A PAL has some benefits, but the negatives may actually outweigh the positives.! Unless the facility is adding and/or removing processes frequently, the PAL is probably not worth it. Regions are still trying to figure out how to proceed in a consistent manner.! Permitting (forms, guidelines, etc) may get easier in the near-term. So, waiting a year or two may be a good idea.! Procedures and methodologies are still being developed. 56
57 Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs) Questions? 57
58 Additional Slides 58
59 Plantwide Applicability Limits The Bright Side You can always go back to doing things the way you used to if it gets too complicated! Caveat But you may pay a price if you opt out, especially if you should have never pursued a PAL in the first place. The PAL may end up delaying a critical capital project. 59
60 Plantwide Applicability Limits Other Considerations Multiple PAL Determinations A single PAL application can have multiple pollutants with multiple limits and multiple baselines. Multiple baselines mean that limits can be advantageous across the board. PAL can be consolidated with NSR permit Single PAL application for multiple locations? No. A PAL only applies to a single location. It doesn t matter that there might be a number of similar facilities with similar pollutants. One PAL one location. 60
61 PAL Permits What type of permit is required for a PAL?! PAL permits shall be considered construction permits for purposes of Rule Chapters 62-4, , 210, , 212, and , F.A.C., but PAL permits shall not authorize any physical change that constitutes a modification under Rule F.A.C., or any modification or reconstruction under 40 CFR Part 60, 61 or 63, 6 adopted by reference at Rule , , F.A.C., to any existing emissions unit, or any addition of any new emissions unit to the facility with the PAL permit. The Department shall authorize such modification or addition through separate normal construction permit processes.! Regulatory authority must provide opportunity for public participation o 30-day public notice o Opportunity for public comment 61
62 PAL Permits Mass Balance Calculations! Requirements include: o A demonstrated means to validate pollutant content in material(s) o Assumption that emissions unit emits all of a pollutant if the pollutant cannot be accounted for o The use of the highest value of a pollutant where a range of the pollutant content is published! Mass balance calculations are acceptable and are widely used for activities using coatings or solvents 62
63 PAL Permits Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS)! Requirements o Systems must meet applicable Part 60, Appendix B Performance Specifications o Systems must sample, analyze, record data once every 15 minutes of operation 63
64 PAL Permits Continuous Parameter Monitoring Systems (CPMS) and Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems (PEMS)! Requirements o The CPMS/PEMS system must demonstrate a correlation between monitored parameters and PAL pollutant emissions across the range of unit operation o The CPMS/PEMS system must sample, analyze, record data once every 15 minutes of operation 64
65 PAL Permits Emission Factors! Requirements o If appropriate, factors must be adjusted for the uncertainty or limitations in the factor s development o Emissions units must operate within the range of the factor s development o If technically practicable, the emission factors for significant units must be re-validated within 6 months of the PAL permit issuance Unless reviewing agency determines that testing is not required 65
66 PAL Permits How is missing monitoring data handled under a PAL?! Sources must record and report maximum potential emissions without considering enforceable limitations or operating restrictions What happens when a source operates at non- correlated operating ranges?! A default value representing the highest potential emissions must be established and used, or! The source is deemed in violation when the unit is operating outside of a correlated parametric range 66
67 PAL Permits Do emissions monitoring systems under a PAL ever have to be re-validated?! Yes - data re-validation is required once every 5-years for all methods of monitoring! Re-validation is accomplished by emission testing or or other scientifically valid means! The PAL applicant may want to consider including a re-validation protocol with the PAL application addressing each type of monitoring and the proposed re-validation procedures 67
This Chapter does not apply to applications and decisions on, development on land reserved in corridor maps.
1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600
More informationELIGIBLE INTERMITTENT RESOURCES PROTOCOL
FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. I Original Sheet No. 848 ELIGIBLE INTERMITTENT RESOURCES PROTOCOL FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. I Original Sheet No. 850 ELIGIBLE INTERMITTENT RESOURCES PROTOCOL Table of Contents
More information[MB Docket Nos , ; MM Docket Nos , ; CS Docket Nos ,
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/27/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-25326, and on govinfo.gov 6712-01 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
More informationVAR Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules
Standard Development Timeline This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective. Development Steps Completed
More informationLicensing & Regulation #379
Licensing & Regulation #379 By Anita Gallucci I t is about three years before your local cable operator's franchise is to expire and your community, as the franchising authority, receives a letter from
More informationRADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION Current Authorization : FCC WEB Reproduction
Nature Of Service: Nature Of Service: Class Of Station: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Fixed Satellite Service Temporary Fixed Earth Station A) Site Location(s) ) Site ID Address Latitude Longitude Elevation
More informationCable Rate Regulation Provisions
Maine Policy Review Volume 2 Issue 3 1993 Cable Rate Regulation Provisions Lisa S. Gelb Frederick E. Ellrod III Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mpr Part of
More informationFAR Part 150 Noise Exposure Map Checklist
FAR Part 150 Noise Exposure Map Checklist I. IDENTIFICATION AND SUBMISSION OF MAP DOCUMENT: Page Number A. Is this submittal appropriately identified as one of the following, submitted under FAR Part 150:
More informationBroadcasting Decision CRTC and Broadcasting Orders CRTC , , , , and
Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2018-468 and Broadcasting Orders CRTC 2018-469, 2018-470, 2018-471, 2018-472, 2018-473 and 2018-474 PDF version References: 2018-128 and 2018-128-1 Ottawa, 14 December 2018 La
More informationFCC Releases Proposals for Broadcast Spectrum Incentive Auctions
Advisory October 2012 FCC Releases Proposals for Broadcast Spectrum Incentive Auctions by Scott R. Flick and Paul A. Cicelski The FCC released its long-awaited Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to begin
More informationStart of DTV Transition 600 MHz repacking
Start of DTV Transition 600 MHz repacking April 21, 2017 Building a prosperous and innovative Canada Brief Recap of Prior Presentations DTV Application Process 600 MHz Repacking (Nov. 21, 2016) Application
More informationAppendix II Decisions on Recommendations Matrix for First Consultation Round
Appendix II Decisions on Recommendations Matrix for First Consultation Round The following summarises the comments and recommendations received from stakehols on the Consultative Document on Broadcasting
More informationSoundExchange compliance Noncommercial webcaster vs. CPB deal
SoundExchange compliance Noncommercial webcaster vs. CPB deal SX compliance under CPB rules 1 can be challenging. Noncommercial Webcaster 2 (NW) is another set of rates and terms that some stations might
More informationMetuchen Public Educational and Governmental (PEG) Television Station. Policies & Procedures
Metuchen Public Educational and Governmental (PEG) Television Station Policies & Procedures TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Purpose 4 Station Operations 4 Taping of Events 4 Use of MEtv Equipment 5 Independently
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2009R0642 EN 12.09.2013 001.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 642/2009 of 22
More informationPreserving Digital Memory at the National Archives and Records Administration of the U.S.
Preserving Digital Memory at the National Archives and Records Administration of the U.S. Kenneth Thibodeau Workshop on Conservation of Digital Memories Second National Conference on Archives, Bologna,
More informationBroadcasting Order CRTC
Broadcasting Order CRTC 2012-409 PDF version Route reference: 2011-805 Additional references: 2011-601, 2011-601-1 and 2011-805-1 Ottawa, 26 July 2012 Amendments to the Exemption order for new media broadcasting
More informationVERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANIES TARIFF FCC NO.
Vice President, Federal Regulatory 3rd Revised Page -1 1300 I Street, NW Cancels 2nd Revised Page -1 Washington, DC 20005 Issued: November 15, 2010 Effective: November 30, 2010 ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS
More informationDate. James W. Davis, PhD James W. Davis Consultant Inc.
Measurement Report W D C C (FM) Tower Site Sanford, rth Carolina Prepared for Central Carolina Community College Prepared by: James W. Davis, PhD July 30, 2003 I, James W. Davis, contract engineer for
More informationENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE BROADCASTING ACT
ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE BROADCASTING ACT Presidential Decree No. 16751, Mar. 13, 2000 Amended by Presidential Decree No. 17137, Feb. 24, 2001 Presidential Decree No. 17156, Mar. 20, 2001 Presidential
More informationApplying to carry BBC content and services: a partners guide to process
Applying to carry BBC content and services: a partners guide to process June 2018 Introduction 1. This document outlines the processes the BBC follows in meeting partner s requests to carry 1 BBC content
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming MB Docket No. 12-203
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Wireless Microphones Proceeding Revisions to Rules Authorizing the Operation of WT Docket No. 08-166 Low Power Auxiliary
More informationBroadcasting Decision CRTC
Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2017-145 PDF version References: 2016-225, 2016-225-1, 2016-225-2, 2016-225-3 and 2016-225-4 Ottawa, 15 May 2017 Corus Entertainment Inc. Across Canada Application 2016-0022-1
More informationInternal assessment details SL and HL
When assessing a student s work, teachers should read the level descriptors for each criterion until they reach a descriptor that most appropriately describes the level of the work being assessed. If a
More informationReply Comments from the Canadian Association of Broadcasters
March 26, 2015 Reply Comments from the Canadian Association of Broadcasters Re: Canada Gazette, Part 1, Notice No. SLPB-005-14 Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band, publication date January 3,
More informationTerm Sheet Reflecting the Agreement of the ACCESS Committee Regarding In-Flight Entertainment November 21, 2016
Term Sheet Reflecting the Agreement of the ACCESS Committee Regarding In-Flight Entertainment November 21, 2016 1. Definitions: a. IFE System: a system provided by an airline that provides entertainment
More informationStart Recording on Site
Speaker notes: webinar 800 MHz Rebanding March 30, 2010 Abstract: The NLECTC Communications Technologies Center of Excellence (CoE) will host a webinar on the 800 MHz transition affecting many public safety
More information(1) These Regulations may be called PEMRA Standards for Cable Television Regulations 2003.
PEMRA Cable Television (Operations) Regulations, 2002. Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) is pleased to make the Standards
More informationObjectives and Methodology for the Over-the-air Television Transition
January 2017 Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Objectives and Methodology for the Over-the-air Television Transition Aussi disponible en français DGGPN-002-017 Contents 1. Intent... 3 2. Background...
More informationOff-Air Recording of Broadcast Programming for Educational Purposes
University of California Policy Off-Air Recording of Broadcast Programming for Educational Purposes Responsible Officer: Vice Provost - Academic Planning, Programs & Coordination Responsible Office: AC
More informationClass B digital device part 15 of the FCC rules
Class B digital device part 15 of the FCC rules The Federal Code Of Regulation (CFR) FCC Part 15 is a common testing standard for most electronic equipment. FCC Part 15 covers the regulations under which
More informationPolicy on the syndication of BBC on-demand content
Policy on the syndication of BBC on-demand content Syndication of BBC on-demand content Purpose 1. This policy is intended to provide third parties, the BBC Executive (hereafter, the Executive) and licence
More informationUpdates to the Form and Filing System
FCC Form 481 Updates to the Form and Filing System Program Year 2016 High Cost Program FCC Form 481 1 Welcome Housekeeping Use the Audio section of your control panel to select an audio source and connect
More informationfor Television ---- Formatting AES/EBU Audio and Auxiliary Data into Digital Video Ancillary Data Space
SMPTE STANDARD ANSI/SMPTE 272M-1994 for Television ---- Formatting AES/EBU Audio and Auxiliary Data into Digital Video Ancillary Data Space 1 Scope 1.1 This standard defines the mapping of AES digital
More informationPlan for Generic Information Collection Activity: Submission for. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/10/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-24234, and on FDsys.gov 7533-01-M NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY
More informationTable of Contents. Section E: Inspection and Acceptance
Table of Contents Section E: Inspection and Acceptance Section Page E.1 52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated by reference (Feb 1998) 1 E.2 Cutover and Acceptance Testing of Services and Systems 1 E.2.1 Cutover
More informationFrequently Asked Questions: Cable TV and Next Generation CAP EAS
Frequently Asked Questions: Cable TV and Next Generation CAP EAS 1. What has changed in Federal Communications Commission EAS rules, and how will that affect Cable Television Operations? On July 12, 2007,
More informationTV Translator Relocation Grant Program
TV Translator Relocation Grant Program Contact: Susana M. Lopez Director of Grants Administration TV Translator Relocation (703) 739-5268 1. Guidelines..........................................................................................
More informationAustralian and New Zealand Energy Performance and Marking Requirements for External Power Supplies
FACT SHEET October 2008 Australian and New Zealand Energy Performance and Marking Requirements for External Power Supplies Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) Implementation dates Australia - 1
More informationReconfiguration Along the U.S.-Mexico Border Meeting in NPSPAC Region 3: Arizona May 16, 2013
Reconfiguration Along the U.S.-Mexico Border Meeting in NPSPAC Region 3: Arizona May 16, 2013 Agenda Program Overview Recent Developments Preparing for Reconfiguration Phases of Reconfiguration Planning
More informationFEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. 16 CFR Part 410. Deceptive Advertising as to Sizes of. Viewable Pictures Shown by Television Receiving Sets
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/09/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-21803, and on govinfo.gov [BILLING CODE 6750-01S] FEDERAL TRADE
More informationBroadcasting Decision CRTC
Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2012-550 PDF version Route reference: 2012-224 Additional reference: 2012-224-1 Ottawa, 10 October 2012 Radio 710 AM Inc. Niagara Falls, Ontario Application 2011-0862-1, received
More informationUser Guide. Centrex Recording Interface
User Guide Centrex Recording Interface Table of Contents Introduction... 2 The Meridian Business Set... 3 Key Numbering Plan (18 button add-on)... 4 Key Numbering Plan (36 button add-on)... 5 Key Numbering
More informationWIRELESS PLANNING MEMORANDUM
WIRELESS PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: Andrew Cohen-Cutler FROM: Robert C. May REVIEWER: Jonathan L. Kramer DATE: RE: Technical Review for Proposed Modification to Rooftop Wireless Site (File No. 160002523)
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of the Commission s Rules with Regard to Commercial Operations in the 3550-3650 MHz Band ) ) ) GN Docket No.
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment to the Commission s Rules ) MB Docket No. 15-53 Concerning Effective Competition ) ) Implementation of
More informationFCC 303-S APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION LICENSE
Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Approved by OMB 3060-0110 (March 2011) FCC 303-S APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION LICENSE Read INSTRUCTIONS Before Filling Out Form
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Parts 73 and 74 of the ) MB Docket No. 08-253 Commission s Rules to Establish Rules for ) Replacement
More informationIn this document, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved, for a
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/11/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-22121, and on FDsys.gov 6712-01 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
More informationBALLER STOKES & LIDE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2014 P STREET, N.W. SUITE 200 WASHINGTON, D.C (202) FAX: (202)
2014 P STREET, N.W. SUITE 200 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 (202) 833-5300 FAX: (202) 833-1180 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Clients, Colleagues, and Other Interested Parties Sean Stokes and Jim Baller DATE: August 16,
More informationOfficial Journal L 191, 23/07/2009 P
Commission Regulation (EC) No 642/2009 of 22 July 2009 implementing Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for televisions Text with EEA
More informationVENDOR MANUAL VERSION 2.0. SECTION 8 Quality Assurance Requirements
VENDOR MANUAL 2017-2018 VERSION 2.0 SECTION 8 Quality Assurance Requirements Updated as of October 7, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Quality Assurance Program 1 Reporting and Quality Approval Process
More informationAPPLICATION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SEA DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2001/42/EC) 1. Legal framework CZECH REPUBLIC LEGAL AND ORGANISATIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 1
APPLICATION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SEA DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2001/42/EC) CZECH REPUBLIC LEGAL AND ORGANISATIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 1 This summary provides basic information on the legal, administrative and
More informationHeads of Agreement. New Zealand International Convention Centre
Heads of Agreement New Zealand International Convention Centre Introduction A. The Crown and SKYCITY Entertainment Group Limited (SKYCITY) have agreed to work co-operatively together to negotiate and execute
More informationBlock System Interface Requirements
Block System Interface Requirements Synopsis This document mandates the requirements for block systems interfaces between signalling infrastructure and railway operations. Copyright in the s is owned by
More informationBroadcasting Decision CRTC
Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2018-228 PDF version Reference: Part 1 licence renewal applications posted on 27 November 2017 Ottawa, 5 July 2018 DHX Television Ltd. Across Canada Public record for these applications:
More informationCHAPTER 446n (Including Public Act and 08-35) COVERED ELECTRONIC DEVICES
CHAPTER 446n (Including Public Act 07-189 and 08-35) COVERED ELECTRONIC DEVICES Note: The underlined text represents the changes from Public Act 07-189 to Public Act 08-35. Table of Contents Sec. 22a-629.
More informationFCC 396. BROADCAST EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM REPORT (To be filed with broadcast license renewal application)
Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 FCC 396 Approved by OMB 3060-0113 (March 2003) BROADCAST EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM REPORT (To be filed with broadcast license renewal
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Parts 1, 2, 22, 24, 27, 90 ) WT Docket No. 10-4 and 95 of the Commission s Rules to Improve ) Wireless
More informationSet-Top-Box Pilot and Market Assessment
Final Report Set-Top-Box Pilot and Market Assessment April 30, 2015 Final Report Set-Top-Box Pilot and Market Assessment April 30, 2015 Funded By: Prepared By: Alexandra Dunn, Ph.D. Mersiha McClaren,
More informationAmendment of Parts 0, 1, 5, 73, and 74 of the Commission s Rules Regarding Posting of Station
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/02/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-13282, and on FDsys.gov 6712-01 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
More informationSection 1 The Portfolio
The Board of Editors in the Life Sciences Diplomate Program Portfolio Guide The examination for diplomate status in the Board of Editors in the Life Sciences consists of the evaluation of a submitted portfolio,
More informationBROADCASTING REFORM. Productivity Commission, Broadcasting Report No. 11, Aus Info, Canberra, Reviewed by Carolyn Lidgerwood.
Reviews BROADCASTING REFORM Productivity Commission, Broadcasting Report No. 11, Aus Info, Canberra, 2000 Reviewed by Carolyn Lidgerwood When it was announced in early 1999 that the Federal Treasurer had
More informationBAL Real Power Balancing Control Performance Standard Background Document
BAL-001-2 Real Power Balancing Control Performance Standard Background Document July 2013 3353 Peachtree Road NE Suite 600, North Tower Atlanta, GA 30326 404-446-2560 www.nerc.com Table of Contents Table
More informationThe National Traffic Signal Report Card: Highlights
The National Traffic Signal Report Card: Highlights THE FIRST-EVER NATIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPORT CARD IS THE RESULT OF A PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN SEVERAL NTOC ASSOCIATIONS LED BY ITE, THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE MEDIA BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE VIDEO DESCRIPTION MARKETPLACE TO INFORM REPORT TO CONGRESS. MB Docket No.
PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 DA 19-40 February 4, 2019
More informationAPPENDIX B. Standardized Television Disclosure Form INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 355 STANDARDIZED TELEVISION DISCLOSURE FORM
APPENDIX B Standardized Television Disclosure Form Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Not approved by OMB 3060-XXXX INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 355 STANDARDIZED TELEVISION DISCLOSURE FORM
More informationUnofficial Comment Form Project Establish and Communicate System Operating Limits (SOL and SOL Exceedance Definitions)
Unofficial Comment Form Project 2015-09 Establish and Communicate System Operating Limits (SOL and SOL Exceedance Definitions) Do not use this form for submitting comments. Use the electronic form to submit
More informationThe Telecommunications Act Chap. 47:31
The Telecommunications Act Chap. 47:31 4 th September 2013 Presentation Overview Legislative Mandate Limitations of Telecommunications Act Proposed Amendments to Telecommunications Act New Technological
More informationCHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATION
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATION REGULATIONS & PROCEDURES A. MISSION STATEMENT Effective 12/19/18 1. Charlotte Mecklenburg Public Access Corporation (CMPAC) was created to manage and operate
More informationOperation/Users Manual
Operation/Users Manual 48-1-21 Please forward any suggestions or errors to: jillas@daumar.es 6- OPERATION MANUAL FOR MACHINE 48 VERSION 48-1-21 This document is made up of the following sections: COMPULSORY
More informationADVISORY Communications and Media
ADVISORY Communications and Media SATELLITE TELEVISION EXTENSION AND LOCALISM ACT OF 2010: A BROADCASTER S GUIDE July 22, 2010 This guide provides a summary of the key changes made by the Satellite Television
More informationWM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona USA
ABSTRACT Unique Regulatory Approach for Licensing the Port Hope Remediation Project in Canada 13315 M. Kostova, D. Howard and P. Elder Directorate of Nuclear Cycle and Facilities Regulation Canadian Nuclear
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Parts 1, 2, 22, 24, 27, 90 ) WT Docket No. 10-4 and 95 of the Commission s Rules to Improve ) Wireless
More informationRECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO OFF-PREMISE SIGN REGULATIONS
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO OFF-PREMISE SIGN REGULATIONS The use of electronic, digital or video technology in signs is permitted and allowed, subject to the following limitations and additional restrictions:
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY OF ELIZABETH STANTON. A. My name is Elizabeth A. Stanton. I am a Principal Economist at Synapse Energy
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION THE OFFICE OF APPEALS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION In the Matter of Brockton Power Co.,
More informationArrangements for: National Progression Award in. Music Business (SCQF level 6) Group Award Code: G9KN 46. Validation date: November 2009
Arrangements for: National Progression Award in Music Business (SCQF level 6) Group Award Code: G9KN 46 Validation date: November 2009 Date of original publication: January 2010 Version: 03 (August 2011)
More information21. OVERVIEW: ANCILLARY STUDY PROPOSALS, SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS
21. OVERVIEW: ANCILLARY STUDY PROPOSALS, SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS REQUESTS AND REQUESTS FOR DATASETS... 21-1 21.1 Ancillary Studies... 21-4 21.1.1 MTN Review and Approval of Ancillary Studies (Administrative)...
More informationAbout Us. Agenda 11/12/2014. Maximizing Benefits from Telephone and Cable Agreements. Municipal Association of South Carolina November 12, 2014
Maximizing Benefits from Telephone and Cable Agreements Municipal Association of South Carolina November 12, 2014 About Us McLean Engineering Company Established 1936 78 years working to help municipals
More informationAgenda Date: 12/19/17 Agenda Item: 1118 OFFICE OF CABLE TELEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Agenda Item: 1118 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 44 South Clinton Avenue, 3r
More informationQuantify. The Subjective. PQM: A New Quantitative Tool for Evaluating Display Design Options
PQM: A New Quantitative Tool for Evaluating Display Design Options Software, Electronics, and Mechanical Systems Laboratory 3M Optical Systems Division Jennifer F. Schumacher, John Van Derlofske, Brian
More informationJournal of Japan Academy of Midwifery Instructions for Authors submitting English manuscripts
Journal of Japan Academy of Midwifery Instructions for Authors submitting English manuscripts 1. Submission qualification Manuscripts should publish new findings of midwifery studies, and the authors must
More informationTWIC IMPLEMENTATION ACCESS AND ESCORTING
AAPA Port Operations, Safety and Information Technology Seminar TWIC IMPLEMENTATION ACCESS AND ESCORTING June 10,2009 STATUS OF ENROLLMENTS Mobile has the sixth highest number of enrollments of the 146
More information21. OVERVIEW: ANCILLARY STUDY PROPOSALS, SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS
21. OVERVIEW: ANCILLARY STUDY PROPOSALS, SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS REQUESTS AND REQUESTS FOR DATASETS... 1 21.1 Ancillary Studies... 4 21.1.1 MTN Review and Approval of Ancillary Studies (Administrative)...
More informationACCESS CHANNEL POLICY NORTH SUBURBAN COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 2019
ACCESS CHANNEL POLICY NORTH SUBURBAN COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Background... 1 2. Purpose, Objectives, and Policy... 2 A. Purpose... 2 B. Objectives... 2 C. General
More informationFederal Communications Commission
Application Filing Results http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/cdbsmenu.hts 1 of 1 7/7/2009 5:38 PM Federal Communications Commission FCC MB - CDBS Electronic Filing Account number:
More informationPublishing & Marketing
PUBLISHING AGREEMENT RIGHTS OWNERSHIP The author fully owns his work and its rights though BookVenture may register copyrights in author s name. WARRANTIES The author guarantees to the company that he/she
More informationGfK Audience Measurements & Insights FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS TV AUDIENCE MEASUREMENT IN THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS TV AUDIENCE MEASUREMENT IN THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA Why do we need a TV audience measurement system? TV broadcasters and their sales houses, advertisers and agencies interact
More informationProperty No
EXHIBIT 2 Property No. 7006946-1 Alyson M. Seigal Area Manager FiOS Franchise Assurance New York City 140 West Street New York, NY 10007 Phone: (888) 364-3467 NYCFiOS@verizon.com September 20, 2016 VIA
More informationRules and Policies WRBB 104.9FM. Fall 2018 (Last Updated 5/2018)
Rules and Policies of WRBB 104.9FM Fall 2018 (Last Updated 5/2018) These Rules and Policies have been developed and adopted to create a safe, stable, and secure environment that nurtures and fuels the
More informationNew York State Board of Elections Voting Machine Replacement Project Task List Revised
1 Pre Election 255 days No Thu 7/27/06 Wed 7/18/07 Wed 7/18/07 2 Voting Machine Procurement OGS 152 days No Tue 8/15/06 Wed 3/14/07 NA 3 Create ordering criteria list for county procurement (Done) OGS
More informationStandard IRO Reliability Coordination Responsibilities and Authorities
A. Introduction 1. Title: Reliability Coordination Responsibilities and Authorities 2. Number: IRO-001-3 3. Purpose: To establish the authority of Reliability Coordinators to direct other entities to prevent
More informationADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY
Doc. B/35 13 March 06 ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY One of the core functions and activities of the ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. ( ATSC ) is the development
More informationThesis/Dissertation Preparation Guidelines
Thesis/Dissertation Preparation Guidelines Updated Summer 2015 PLEASE NOTE: GUIDELINES CHANGE. PLEASE FOLLOW THE CURRENT GUIDELINES AND TEMPLATE. DO NOT USE A FORMER STUDENT S THESIS OR DISSERTATION AS
More information0.1. Outage Management Process Summary
0.1 Outage Management Process Summary Issue: 1.0 Issue Date: August 27, 2014 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 4 1.1 Purpose... 4 1.2 Glossary... 4 State Transition Model... 8 2. Outage Management Processes...
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY Board of Public Utilities Two Gateway Center Newark, NJ
Agenda Date: 8/4/10 Agenda Item: IIIG STATE OF NEW JERSEY Board of Public Utilities Two Gateway Center Newark, NJ 07102 www.ni.aov/bdu/ IN THE MATTER OF CABLEVISION OF NEWARK FOR THE CONVERSION TO A SYSTEM-WIDE
More informationDCL9AW. User Manual. English
DCL9AW User Manual English PRECAUTIONS Information for users applicable in European Union countries 1 Information for users applicable in United States of America 1 Installation 1 Power connection 1 Maintenance
More informationChapter 6. University Library
Authority: Approved by the Dean of the Faculty Affairs 6.1 Policy Statement Chapter 6. University Library OIST Graduate University Policies, Rules, & Procedures The Library of the Okinawa Institute of
More informationProcessing the Output of TOSOM
Processing the Output of TOSOM William Jackson, Dan Hicks, Jack Reed Survivability Technology Area US Army RDECOM TARDEC Warren, Michigan 48397-5000 ABSTRACT The Threat Oriented Survivability Optimization
More information