Broadcasters Policy Agenda. 115th Congress

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Broadcasters Policy Agenda. 115th Congress"

Transcription

1 Broadcasters Policy Agenda 115th Congress

2 Broadcasters Policy Agenda 115th Congress Local television and radio stations are an integral part of their communities. We turn on the TV or radio to find out what the weather is like before heading to work, to catch our favorite sporting event, to hear new music and watch the shows we love, or to keep safe during emergencies. When we want to know what s going on in our part of the world, from objective and trusted sources, we know our local stations will always be there for us, reporting the facts and sharing the information we seek. Broadcasters are always at our fingertips on laptops, smartphones and digital dashboards and continually strive to make their signals available on every device at every location. In an ever-changing media landscape, we can count on broadcasters unbreakable commitment to upholding our nation s democratic ideals the freedom of speech and of the press. Local TV and radio stations also make a valuable economic impact on cities and towns across the country, supporting more than 2.49 million American jobs and generating $1.19 trillion annually for the nation s economy. No other medium connects us to our communities and to each other like broadcast TV and radio. And nobody provides the local news, shows, music and emergency information live and free to all Americans like your local stations. As the voice of local radio and TV stations in Washington, D.C., the National Association of Broadcasters is proud to advocate on the issues that affect stations ability to innovate and serve their listeners and viewers your constituents. We are pleased to share this report with you, which provides an overview of some of the key policy issues broadcasters we will be focused on during the 115th Congress. Gordon H. Smith NAB President and CEO

3 Unleashing the Next Generation of Broadcast Television for Viewers The next generation of broadcast television technology will deliver lifesaving advanced emergency alerting, stunning pictures, customizable and immersive audio and improved reception available for free to enhance and expand the broadcast viewing experience. Because the new technology combines the best of broadcast television and broadband, Next Gen TV allows local stations to better personalize their broadcasts with information and interactive features to give viewers the content most relevant to them. Next Gen TV also supports enhanced mobile reception, so viewers can access unlimited live local and national news, the most popular sports and entertainment programs and children s shows on mobile devices over-the-air without relying on cellular data services. That means viewers won t run through their data caps and there s no monthly fee broadcast TV is free. The only thing that stands between viewers and this new enhanced free service is government action. Unlike other competitive services, local stations can only begin broadcasting in the Next Gen TV standard after approval by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The National Association of Broadcasters, Consumer Technology Association, America s Public Television Stations and the Advanced Warning and Response Network Alliance joined together to ask the FCC to allow TV stations and manufacturers to voluntarily adopt Next Gen TV. Unleashing the next generation of free broadcast television service requires no additional spectrum and no government subsidies; it simply allows television stations to voluntarily invest in enhanced technology to provide better services for free to all viewers. Broadcasters urge Congress to ask the FCC to move quickly to allow stations to invest in innovation that benefits their viewers. Broadcast news remains the #1 source for news and information, outpacing other platforms.

4 Growing Businesses and Preserving Jobs Through Local Advertising For many small retailers, local television and radio are the best ways to reach their customers and grow their businesses. Making advertising more expensive by changing its tax treatment would hamper the growth of these businesses and the jobs they support in local communities. An estimated $1 trillion in U.S. economic output and 1.38 million jobs are attributable to the stimulating effects of advertising on local television and radio. 1 Tax changes that make it more expensive for businesses to advertise would not only hurt local businesses, but impede the ability of TV and radio stations to offer the high-quality news, information and entertainment on which the public relies. The local broadcast radio and television industry contributes $1.19 trillion of gross domestic product and 2.49 million jobs to the American economy annually. 2 By 2019, advertising is projected to support 23.2 million U.S. jobs and $7.4 trillion in U.S. output. 3 Broadcasters and their small business partners will advocate to ensure advertising remains fully deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense in the year the expense is incurred. Any legislation that discourages advertising would hurt local businesses and harm broadcasters ability to serve their local communities. 1 Source: Woods and Poole Economics, Local Broadcasting: An Engine for Economic Growth, Source: Woods and Poole Economics, Local Broadcasting: An Engine for Economic Growth, Source: IHS Economics and Country Risk, The Economic Impact of Advertising in the United States: March 2015 $1 trillion in U.S. economic output and 1.38 million jobs are attributable to the stimulating effects of advertising on local television and radio.

5 Recognizing Radio s Vital Role in Local Communities Whether in a car, at work or at the gym, 268 million Americans turn to local radio each week to get the news, information and music they want all for free. And when disaster strikes, listeners turn to their local stations first to get the emergency updates that keep them safe. For more than 80 years, record labels and performers have thrived from radio airplay which is essentially free advertising from local radio stations. Local radio stations provide record labels with free promotion worth as much as $2.4 billion annually. But as the foreign-owned record label conglomerates struggle to adapt to a competitive media landscape, they continue to aggressively lobby for a new performance tax on local radio stations simply for airing and promoting artists music. A performance tax would financially hurt local stations and jobs, potentially forcing some stations off the air. It would also reduce the amount of music radio stations play and harm new artists trying to start careers. Small and minority-owned stations would be especially impacted by this legislation that would funnel money out of local communities to huge off-shore companies. In previous Congresses, broadcasters worked with the record labels to try to resolve the performance tax issue through good faith private discussions. Yet, the big record labels advocacy group rejected compromise and walked away from negotiations. Since that time, numerous radio companies and record labels have negotiated private deals of their own that compensate copyright owners and performers, demonstrating the ability of the marketplace to best address the issue. In the 114th Congress, more than 250 legislators including a bipartisan majority in the House supported the Local Radio Freedom Act. This legislation recognizes the important role stations play in their local communities and opposes any new performance fee, tax, royalty or other charge on local radio stations. Broadcasters ask Congress to continue to stand up for local radio listeners by cosponsoring the Local Radio Freedom Act and stop the foreign-owned record labels attempts to impose a new tax on local radio stations. More than 250 bipartisan legislators cosponsored the Local Radio Freedom Act in the 114th Congress.

6 Ensuring Viewers Access to Free, Local Television From local weather and traffic reports to the highest-rated network shows, Americans rely on local TV stations for the most trusted news and highest-rated entertainment, all for free. In fact, 70 million Americans rely on an antenna to get their local channels and do not subscribe to a cable or satellite service. As authorized by Congress, the FCC is undertaking an unprecedented auction of the television airwaves. During this process, local TV stations are incentivized to give up their channels to be auctioned to wireless companies. In turn, these stations will share in some of the auction proceeds. At the conclusion of the auction, the FCC will relocate the remaining TV stations including those that did not volunteer to participate in the auction moving their channel assignments. This is the same process that occurred when TV stations transitioned to all-digital broadcasting in 2009 (the DTV transition), but this time, stations will not have a second channel to ensure continuity of service to viewers. When a station is forced to move to a new channel assignment, it faces a number of technical challenges and resource constraints that are not under its control. To prevent harm to stations and their viewers, Congress authorized $1.75 billion in the Television Broadcaster Relocation Fund to cover the reasonable costs necessary to relocate broadcasters following the auction. Since that time, the FCC has pursued an aggressive relocation plan likely to cost significantly more than envisioned by Congress. The FCC has also, entirely on its own, adopted a rigid and inflexible deadline by which stations must cease operating on their old channels, regardless of whether they have been able to complete their relocation. Local stations should not be forced to foot the bill for expenses that Congress did not intend and many stations cannot afford. Stations also should not be forced off the air due to unachievable relocation deadlines that deny viewers the important local news and information on which they depend. Broadcasters will advocate for legislation that ensures viewers uninterrupted access to their local TV stations during the relocation of stations. Broadcasters support legislation that ensures stations choosing not to participate in the incentive auction will not be forced to cover costs or go dark as the result of inadequate flexibility in the relocation fund and FCC deadlines. 70 million Americans rely on broadcast television through an antenna.

7 Fostering a Competitive Media Marketplace Local TV and radio stations are best able to serve their communities when they are allowed to compete on a level playing field in the digital media marketplace. Unfortunately, outdated broadcast ownership regulations dating back to the 1970s could hurt local stations ability to fairly compete and serve their audiences. The communications ecosystem dramatically changed with the proliferation of new video and audio services and the advent of the internet. With the explosion of new media sources, such as social media, blogs and websites, outdated restrictions from the last century are not needed to ensure diverse points of view. Restrictions adopted in 1975 preventing common ownership of a printed (but not an online) newspaper and even a single local radio or TV station in the same market, for example, are unnecessary and anticompetitive, as are rules strictly limiting the ownership of TV stations in local markets. Modernizing these outdated restrictions would help ensure local stations continued economic vibrancy, which is critical to their ability to serve their communities in an increasingly competitive media landscape. In 2016, the FCC decided on a party-line vote to retain all of its existing broadcast ownership rules, even those dating back to the mid-1970s before the explosion of multichannel and digital media. Broadcasters and many policymakers agreed this decision ignored new technologies and marketplace realities, and were based on the outdated premise that broadcasters only compete against one another for audiences and advertising. Today s ownership rules apply significant regulatory burdens on broadcast stations, but not their direct competitors. Ironically, the FCC has allowed megamergers in the cable and satellite industry, but has held local stations hostage under decades-old, outdated rules. Broadcasters urge Congress to support efforts to modernize ownership rules to account for the rise, and increasing influence, of digital and other forms of media, and foster competition in the communications ecosystem. Rules from 1975 ignore the rise of new media platforms and hamstring local broadcast stations.

8 Allowing Broadcasters to Continue Negotiating in the Free Market Broadcasters create and deliver the most compelling and popular programming on television 95 percent of the highest-rated primetime shows are on local channels. Broadcast content provides real value to cable and satellite companies, which negotiate with broadcasters for the right to resell their signals in a process known as retransmission consent. In 1992, Congress granted retransmission consent in legislation intended to curb excessive cable rate increases while promoting competition in the video marketplace. Prior to this, cable operators used broadcast signals without stations consent and resold those signals to their subscribers, making millions. Today, local stations and cable and satellite providers hold private, market-based negotiations that provide incentives for both parties to come to mutually beneficial arrangements. Stations reinvest the revenue provided by these negotiations into valued programming. Broadcasters strongly oppose government intervention that would upend the retransmission consent system solely for the benefit of the big cable and satellite companies. The negotiation process is fair and market-driven. Eliminating stations ability to negotiate for the value of their signals would mean less choice for viewers and fewer resources for stations to dedicate to local news and sports, public affairs programming, coverage of emergency weather events and community activities. In fact, Congress in 2014 directed the FCC to review the retransmission consent negotiation process. Following a thorough review, the FCC in 2016 determined that no changes were needed to the rules requiring both broadcasters and pay-tv providers to negotiate in good faith. Broadcasters will continue to advocate for policies that promote stations ability to conduct private, marketdriven negotiations with cable and satellite companies free from unnecessary government intervention. Some cable and satellite companies have aggressively lobbied to restrict broadcasters ability to freely negotiate for retransmission consent, instead seeking to establish an intrusive government role in the marketplace. These big pay-tv companies unfairly blame retransmission consent for higher consumer prices, while at the same time recording billions in record profits year after year. The truth is, cable bills have risen faster than sometimes double the rate of inflation since the mid-1990s, long before broadcasters received cash compensation for their signals. Broadcast TV shows dominate primetime ratings, representing 95 of the top 100 shows

9 Providing More Choice for Listeners Through Streaming Local radio stations are innovating to expand access to their on-air programming on new platforms, providing the best experience for listeners when and where they want it. In addition to music, local radio stations provide their listeners with important local news, sports, weather, traffic and community information, as well as emergency alerts. Broadcasters want listeners to have access to this critical information on every device, everywhere they are. While emerging technologies create new opportunities for radio stations to serve their listeners, many stations still do not stream their programs over the internet due to onerous recordkeeping and reporting requirements and the high cost of royalty rates. This is especially true for smaller stations. Broadcasters were pleased that in 2015 the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) acknowledged that royalty rates needed to be reduced to encourage streaming and lowered rates for stations. While these new rates represent a step in the right direction, the cost and burdensome administrative requirements still prove prohibitive for many broadcasters. Broadcasters urge Congress to ensure fair streaming rates and regulations that benefit artists and listeners by incentivizing more radio stations to stream. 268 million people listen to radio each week in the U.S.

10 115th Congress Broadcasters Policy Agenda Broadcasters unshakeable commitment to serving their communities compels them to keep innovating so that local stations can be everywhere their viewers and listeners are. In the 115th Congress, broadcasters look forward to working with legislators on policies that strengthen their ability to compete in the media and telecommunications ecosystem, allowing them to better serve their communities. For more information on the issues that affect local radio and television stations, please contact the National Association of Broadcasters advocacy team. Contact Us (800) nab.org/advocacy

11 1771 N Street NW Washington DC nab.org

114th Congress BROADCASTERS POLICY AGENDA

114th Congress BROADCASTERS POLICY AGENDA 114th Congress BROADCASTERS POLICY AGENDA Our Mission The National Association of Broadcasters is the voice for the nation s radio and television broadcasters. We deliver value to our members through advocacy,

More information

Ensure Changes to the Communications Act Protect Broadcast Viewers

Ensure Changes to the Communications Act Protect Broadcast Viewers Ensure Changes to the Communications Act Protect Broadcast Viewers The Senate Commerce Committee and the House Energy and Commerce Committee have indicated an interest in updating the country s communications

More information

Digital Television Transition in US

Digital Television Transition in US 2010/TEL41/LSG/RR/008 Session 2 Digital Television Transition in US Purpose: Information Submitted by: United States Regulatory Roundtable Chinese Taipei 7 May 2010 Digital Television Transition in the

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming MB Docket No. 12-203

More information

Statement of the National Association of Broadcasters

Statement of the National Association of Broadcasters Statement of the National Association of Broadcasters Hearing before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet May 10, 2007 The National Association

More information

Broadband Changes Everything

Broadband Changes Everything Broadband Changes Everything OECD Roundtable On Communications Convergence UK Department of Trade and Industry Conference Centre London June 2-3, 2005 Michael Hennessy President Canadian Cable Telecommunications

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Wireless Microphones Proceeding Revisions to Rules Authorizing the Operation of WT Docket No. 08-166 Low Power Auxiliary

More information

RATE INCREASE FAQs. Can you tell me what one TV station/network costs? I am in a promotional package, are my rates changing now too?

RATE INCREASE FAQs. Can you tell me what one TV station/network costs? I am in a promotional package, are my rates changing now too? RATE INCREASE FAQs 1 Why are rates going up? 2 Can you tell me what one TV station/network costs? 3 4 I refuse to pay more money for lousy service. 5 I am in a promotional package, are my rates changing

More information

RATE INCREASE FAQs. Can you tell me what one TV station/network costs?

RATE INCREASE FAQs. Can you tell me what one TV station/network costs? RATE INCREASE FAQs 1 Why are rates going up? 2 Can you tell me what one TV station/network costs? 3 Your services are too expensive...i am going to switch to a different provider. 4 I refuse to pay more

More information

2015 Rate Change FAQs

2015 Rate Change FAQs 2015 Rate Change FAQs Why are rates going up? TV networks continue to demand major increases in the costs we pay them to carry their networks. We negotiate to keep costs as low as possible and will continue

More information

AUSTRALIAN SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION AND RADIO ASSOCIATION

AUSTRALIAN SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION AND RADIO ASSOCIATION 7 December 2015 Intellectual Property Arrangements Inquiry Productivity Commission GPO Box 1428 CANBERRA CITY ACT 2601 By email: intellectual.property@pc.gov.au Dear Sir/Madam The Australian Subscription

More information

LINKS: Programming Disputes. Viacom Networks Negotiations. The Facts about Viacom Grande Agreement Renewal:

LINKS: Programming Disputes. Viacom Networks Negotiations. The Facts about Viacom Grande Agreement Renewal: Programming Disputes Viacom Networks Negotiations After long and difficult negotiations we are pleased to inform you that we are finalizing an agreement for renewal of our contract with Viacom Networks,

More information

Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band. Notice No. SLPB Published in the Canada Gazette, Part 1 Dated January 3, 2015

Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band. Notice No. SLPB Published in the Canada Gazette, Part 1 Dated January 3, 2015 Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band Notice No. SLPB-005-14 Published in the Canada Gazette, Part 1 Dated January 3, 2015 Comments of Ontario Ministry of Economic Development, Employment and Infrastructure

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Authorizing Permissive Use of Next ) MB Docket No. 16-142 Generation Broadcast Television ) Standard ) REPLY TO OPPOSITION OF NTCA THE

More information

LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS: Maintaining an Important Presence in 2016 & Beyond. August Copyright All Rights Reserved.

LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS: Maintaining an Important Presence in 2016 & Beyond. August Copyright All Rights Reserved. Maintaining an Important Presence in 2016 & Beyond August 2016 Copyright 2016. All Rights Reserved. BIA/Kelsey CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 3 Viewer Options... 6 Viewing Hours... 6 Subscription

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) Authorizing Permissive Use of the Next ) GN Docket No. 16-142 Generation Broadcast Television Standard ) ) OPPOSITION

More information

The Future of TV: Protecting Viewers and Preserving Broadcast Spectrum

The Future of TV: Protecting Viewers and Preserving Broadcast Spectrum The Future of TV: Protecting Viewers and Preserving Broadcast Spectrum Grassroots Action Kit August 2011 The Future of TV: Protecting Viewers and Preserving Broadcast Spectrum Contents Action Alert 3 Issue

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) ) CSR-7947-Z Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. ) ) ) Request for Waiver of 47 C.F.R. 76.1903 ) MB Docket

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) MB Docket No. 12-83 Interpretation of the Terms Multichannel Video ) Programming Distributor and Channel ) as raised

More information

The Broadcast Digital Transition

The Broadcast Digital Transition The Broadcast Digital Transition Impact on Cable Television Households Juan Otero Senior Director, Government Affairs Comcast Cable 1 The switch to digital-only television signals in early 2009 will usher

More information

LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS PROFILES AND TRENDS FOR 2014 AND BEYOND

LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS PROFILES AND TRENDS FOR 2014 AND BEYOND STATE OF THE INDUSTRY REPORT LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS PROFILES AND TRENDS FOR 2014 AND BEYOND December 2013 Copyright Nov. 2013. All Rights Reserved. BIA/Kelsey CONTENTS Executive summary... iv Introduction...

More information

SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS

SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS TESTIMONY OF ANDREW S. WRIGHT, PRESIDENT SATELLITE BROADCASTING AND COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION RURAL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY May 22, 2003 Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Senator

More information

Title VI in an IP Video World

Title VI in an IP Video World Title VI in an IP Video World Marvin Sirbu WIE 2017 2017 Marvin A. Sirbu 1 The Evolution of Video Delivery Over The Air (OTA) Broadcast Multichannel Video Program Distributors Community Antenna TelevisionèCable

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF PCIA THE WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF PCIA THE WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of the Commission s Rules with Regard to Commercial Operations in the 3550-3650 MHz Band GN Docket No. 12-354

More information

Statement of Patricia Jo Boyers President and Chief Executive Officer at BOYCOM Cablevision, Inc. Board Member of the American Cable Association

Statement of Patricia Jo Boyers President and Chief Executive Officer at BOYCOM Cablevision, Inc. Board Member of the American Cable Association Statement of Patricia Jo Boyers President and Chief Executive Officer at BOYCOM Cablevision, Inc. Board Member of the American Cable Association Before the Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Lifeline and Link Up Reform and WC Docket No. 11-42 Modernization Telecommunications Carriers Eligible for WC Docket

More information

Cable Rate Regulation Provisions

Cable Rate Regulation Provisions Maine Policy Review Volume 2 Issue 3 1993 Cable Rate Regulation Provisions Lisa S. Gelb Frederick E. Ellrod III Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mpr Part of

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Applications of AT&T Inc. and DIRECTV For Consent to Assign or Transfer Licenses and Authorizations MB Docket No. 14-90

More information

Before the. Federal Communications Commission. Washington, DC

Before the. Federal Communications Commission. Washington, DC Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC In the Matter of ) ) Expanding the Economic and ) GN Docket No. 12-268 Innovation Opportunities of Spectrun ) Through Incentive Auctions ) REPLY

More information

Comments on Recommendations of ECTEL to the NTRC on Revised Draft Electronic Communications Bill

Comments on Recommendations of ECTEL to the NTRC on Revised Draft Electronic Communications Bill Brian Bartlette, Managing Director Winners TV Zimbra consultation@ectel.int Comments on Recommendations of ECTEL to the NTRC on Revised Draft Electronic Communications Bill From : BBartlette

More information

Should the FCC continue to issue rules on media ownership? Or should the FCC stop regulating the ownership of media?

Should the FCC continue to issue rules on media ownership? Or should the FCC stop regulating the ownership of media? Media Mergers and the Public Interest In addition to antitrust regulation, many media mergers and acquisitions are subject to regulations from the Federal Communications Commission. Are FCC rules on media

More information

FCC Releases Proposals for Broadcast Spectrum Incentive Auctions

FCC Releases Proposals for Broadcast Spectrum Incentive Auctions Advisory October 2012 FCC Releases Proposals for Broadcast Spectrum Incentive Auctions by Scott R. Flick and Paul A. Cicelski The FCC released its long-awaited Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to begin

More information

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS22306 October 20, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Deficit Reduction and Spectrum Auctions: FY2006 Budget Reconciliation Linda K. Moore Analyst in Telecommunications

More information

C-Band Alliance ITIF Forum On Mid-Band Spectrum. Preston Padden - EVP, Advocacy & Government Relations, C-Band Alliance November 13, 2018

C-Band Alliance ITIF Forum On Mid-Band Spectrum. Preston Padden - EVP, Advocacy & Government Relations, C-Band Alliance November 13, 2018 1 C-Band Alliance ITIF Forum On Mid-Band Spectrum Preston Padden - EVP, Advocacy & Government Relations, C-Band Alliance November 13, 2018 2 The U.S. Cannot Fall Behind In The Race To 5G Every part of

More information

Hearing on Future of Emergency Alerting. United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce

Hearing on Future of Emergency Alerting. United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce Hearing on Future of Emergency Alerting United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technology May 17, 2017 Statement of Sam Matheny Chief

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of 2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review Review of the Commission s Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Video Device Competition Implementation of Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Commercial Availability

More information

THE FAIR MARKET VALUE

THE FAIR MARKET VALUE THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF LOCAL CABLE RETRANSMISSION RIGHTS FOR SELECTED ABC OWNED STATIONS BY MICHAEL G. BAUMANN AND KENT W. MIKKELSEN JULY 15, 2004 E CONOMISTS I NCORPORATED W ASHINGTON DC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

More information

Figure 1: U.S. Spectrum Configuration

Figure 1: U.S. Spectrum Configuration September 10, 2013 TO: CPB Board of Directors THROUGH: Pat Harrison FROM: SUBJECT: Mark Erstling Spectrum Overview (Background) Spectrum Allocation Smart phones, tablet computers, and other mobile Internet

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the h Matter of Public Notice on Interpretation of the Terms Multichannel Video Programming Distributor and Channel as Raised in Pending

More information

The ABC and the changing media landscape

The ABC and the changing media landscape The ABC and the changing media landscape 1 THE ABC AND THE MEDIA LANDSCAPE The Australian media is and always has been characterised by a mix of publicly-funded broadcasters and commercial media operators.

More information

Resolution Calling on the FCC to Facilitate the DTV Transition through Additional Consumer Education Efforts

Resolution Calling on the FCC to Facilitate the DTV Transition through Additional Consumer Education Efforts Resolution Calling on the FCC to Facilitate the DTV Transition through Additional Consumer Education Efforts WHEREAS, Congress has established February 17, 2009, as the hard deadline for the end of full-power

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS Before the Federal Communications Commission, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment to the FCC s Good-Faith Bargaining Rules MB RM-11720 To: The Secretary REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF

More information

The Impact of the DTV Transition on Consumers and Consumer Choice. Overview of the DTV Transition Situation

The Impact of the DTV Transition on Consumers and Consumer Choice. Overview of the DTV Transition Situation The Impact of the DTV Transition on Consumers and Consumer Choice Session: Opportunity in Chaos Economics of the Digital TV Transition The Columbia Institute for Tele-Information Columbia University Barry

More information

TESTIMONY LAWRENCE J. BLANFORD, PRESIDENT AND CEO PHILIPS CONSUMER ELECTRONICS COMPANY. Before the SUBCOMMITTEE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND THE INTERNET

TESTIMONY LAWRENCE J. BLANFORD, PRESIDENT AND CEO PHILIPS CONSUMER ELECTRONICS COMPANY. Before the SUBCOMMITTEE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND THE INTERNET TESTIMONY OF LAWRENCE J. BLANFORD, PRESIDENT AND CEO PHILIPS CONSUMER ELECTRONICS COMPANY Before the SUBCOMMITTEE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND THE INTERNET THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE U.S. HOUSE

More information

Competition Works. Consumers Win!

Competition Works. Consumers Win! Competition Works. Consumers Win! Competition, Choice and Value Shape Today s Communications Marketplace National Cable & Telecommunications Association 1 Today s Communications Marketplace Intensely competitive,

More information

KANZ BROADBAND SUMMIT DIGITAL MEDIA OPPORTUNITIES DIGITAL CONTENT INITIATIVES Kim Dalton Director of Television ABC 3 November 2009

KANZ BROADBAND SUMMIT DIGITAL MEDIA OPPORTUNITIES DIGITAL CONTENT INITIATIVES Kim Dalton Director of Television ABC 3 November 2009 KANZ BROADBAND SUMMIT DIGITAL MEDIA OPPORTUNITIES DIGITAL CONTENT INITIATIVES Kim Dalton Director of Television ABC 3 November 2009 We live in interesting times. This is true of many things but especially

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Assessment and Collection of Regulatory ) MD Docket No. 13-140 Fees for Fiscal Year 2013 ) ) Procedure for Assessment

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.624(g of the MB Docket No. 17-264 Commission s Rules Regarding Submission of FCC Form 2100,

More information

Oral Statement Of. The Honorable Kevin J. Martin Chairman Federal Communications Commission

Oral Statement Of. The Honorable Kevin J. Martin Chairman Federal Communications Commission Oral Statement Of The Honorable Kevin J. Martin Chairman Federal Communications Commission Before the Committee on Energy and Commerce U.S. House of Representatives April 15, 2008 1 Introduction Good morning

More information

Global Forum on Competition

Global Forum on Competition Unclassified DAF/COMP/GF/WD(2013)26 DAF/COMP/GF/WD(2013)26 Unclassified Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 24-Jan-2013 English

More information

S Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

S Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, S. 1680 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited

More information

CANADIAN CABLE SYSTEMS ALLIANCE INC.

CANADIAN CABLE SYSTEMS ALLIANCE INC. CANADIAN CABLE SYSTEMS ALLIANCE INC. Submission for Consideration in the Standing Committee on International Trade s Study on Bilateral and Trilateral Trade in North America Between Canada, the United

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of ) MB Docket No. 14-16 Competition in the Market for Delivery ) Of Video Programming

More information

COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 1999

COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 1999 OCDE OECD ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC DE DÉVELOPPEMENT ÉCONOMIQUES CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 1999 BROADCASTING: Regulatory Issues Country: Norway

More information

PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY CENTRE LE CENTRE POUR LA DÉFENSE DE L INTÉRÊT PUBLIC

PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY CENTRE LE CENTRE POUR LA DÉFENSE DE L INTÉRÊT PUBLIC PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY CENTRE LE CENTRE POUR LA DÉFENSE DE L INTÉRÊT PUBLIC The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) is a non-profit organization based in Ottawa, Ontario that provides advocacy and

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Promoting Spectrum Access for Wireless ) GN Docket No. 14-166 Microphone Operations ) ) Expanding the Economic and

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) Over-The-Air Broadcast Television Viewers ) MB Docket No. 04-210 To the Media Bureau COMMENTS OF THE MINORITY MEDIA

More information

1. Introduction. 2. Part A: Executive Summary

1. Introduction. 2. Part A: Executive Summary MTN'S RESPONSE TO ICASA'S INQUIRY INTO SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION BROADCASTING SERVICES IN TERMS OF SECTION 4 B OF THE ICASA ACT 13 OF 2000 IN GORVENMENT GAZETTE NO. 41070 DATED 25 AUGUST 2017 1 P a g e 1.

More information

The Telecommunications Act Chap. 47:31

The Telecommunications Act Chap. 47:31 The Telecommunications Act Chap. 47:31 4 th September 2013 Presentation Overview Legislative Mandate Limitations of Telecommunications Act Proposed Amendments to Telecommunications Act New Technological

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Elimination of Main Studio Rule MB Docket No. 17-106 COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS 1771 N Street,

More information

[MB Docket Nos , ; MM Docket Nos , ; CS Docket Nos ,

[MB Docket Nos , ; MM Docket Nos , ; CS Docket Nos , This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/27/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-25326, and on govinfo.gov 6712-01 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF GRAY TELEVISION, INC. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Expanding the Economic and Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum Through Incentive Auctions Docket No. 12-268 COMMENTS

More information

Deutsche Bank Conference June 2005

Deutsche Bank Conference June 2005 Deutsche Bank Conference June 2005 www.hearstargyle.com This presentation includes forward-looking statements. We based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about

More information

Response to the "Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band" Canada Gazette, Part I SLPB December, Submitted By: Ontario Limited

Response to the Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band Canada Gazette, Part I SLPB December, Submitted By: Ontario Limited Response to the "Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band" Canada Gazette, Part I SLPB-005-14 December, 2014 Submitted By: February 26th, 2015 1 DISCLAIMER Although efforts have been made to ensure

More information

Broadcasting Decision CRTC

Broadcasting Decision CRTC Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2018-307 PDF version References: 2017-365, 2017-365-1 and 2017-365-2 Ottawa, 23 August 2018 Vues & Voix Across Canada Public record for this application: 2017-0643-3 Public hearing

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 5, 73, and 74 of the ) MB Docket No. 18-121 Commission s Rules Regarding Posting of Station

More information

MAJOR COURT DECISIONS, 2009

MAJOR COURT DECISIONS, 2009 MAJOR COURT DECISIONS, 2009 Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 579 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009) Issue: Whether the thirty percent subscriber limit cap for cable television operators adopted by the Federal Communications

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Section 73.3555(e) of the ) MB Docket No. 17-318 Commission s Rules, National Television ) Multiple

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) In the Matter of ) ) Sports Blackout Rules ) MB Docket No.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) In the Matter of ) ) Sports Blackout Rules ) MB Docket No. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 ) In the Matter of ) ) Sports Blackout Rules ) MB Docket No. 12-3 ) COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS NAB Law Clerk

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.3555(e of the Commission s Rules, National Television Multiple Ownership Rule MB Docket No.

More information

600 Matters. A vision for collaborating with America s broadcasters

600 Matters. A vision for collaborating with America s broadcasters 600 Matters A vision for collaborating with America s broadcasters 2017 We re all in! When the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced the 600 MHz broadcast spectrum auction, the Un-carrier committed

More information

Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The American Cable Association ( ACA ) hereby submits these comments in

Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The American Cable Association ( ACA ) hereby submits these comments in Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Channel Lineup Requirements Sections 76.1705 and 76.1700(a(4 Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative MB Docket No. 18-92 MB Docket

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Promoting the Availability of Diverse ) MB Docket No. 16-41 and Independent Sources of ) Video Programming ) REPLY

More information

Washington Update. Bajo Control? Todo. Is Everything Under Control?

Washington Update. Bajo Control? Todo. Is Everything Under Control? Washington Update Todo Bajo Control? Is Everything Under Control? 1 The Year in Review Intellectual Property DTV Transition Including White Spaces 2 IP Overview Digital Copyright ISP Filtering Fair Use

More information

OECD COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 2001 Broadcasting Section

OECD COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 2001 Broadcasting Section OECD COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 2001 Broadcasting Section Country: CANADA Date completed: June 29, 2000 1 Broadcasting services available BROADCASTING 1. Please provide details of the broadcasting and cable

More information

David L. Cohen Executive Vice President. Comcast!GE Announcement Regarding NBC Universal

David L. Cohen Executive Vice President. Comcast!GE Announcement Regarding NBC Universal CSomcast~ David L. Cohen Executive Vice President Comcast Corporation One Comcast Center Phiiadelphia, PA 19103-2838 Office: 215-286-7585 Fax: 215-286-7546 david_cohenc1comcast.com MEMORANDUM FROM: David

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 ) In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of the Commission's Rules Related ) MB Docket No. 10-71 to Retransmission Consent ) ) COMMENTS OF THE

More information

8 March Ms. Diane Rhéaume Secretary-General Canadian Radio-Television & Telecommunications Commission Ottawa, Ontario K1A ON2

8 March Ms. Diane Rhéaume Secretary-General Canadian Radio-Television & Telecommunications Commission Ottawa, Ontario K1A ON2 8 March 2007 Ms. Diane Rhéaume Secretary-General Canadian Radio-Television & Telecommunications Commission Ottawa, Ontario K1A ON2 Re: Broadcasting Notice of Public Hearing CRTC 2007-1, Item 19 - Application

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington DC 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission s Rules to Facilitate the Use of Microwave for Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) Promoting Investment in the 3550-3700 MHz ) GN Docket No. 17-258 Band ) ) I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY COMMENTS

More information

Submission to Inquiry into subscription television broadcasting services in South Africa. From Cape Town TV

Submission to Inquiry into subscription television broadcasting services in South Africa. From Cape Town TV Submission to Inquiry into subscription television broadcasting services in South Africa From Cape Town TV 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Cape Town TV submits this document in response to the invitation by ICASA

More information

Telephone Facsimile

Telephone Facsimile TELUS Mobility Floor 16 200 Consilium Place Scarborough, Ontario Canada M1H 3J3 Ed Prior Director, Government & Regulatory Affairs 416 279 7523 Telephone 416 279 3166 Facsimile ed.prior@telus.com October

More information

July 24, Dear Chairman Inouye:

July 24, Dear Chairman Inouye: July 24, 2007 The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 722 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Chairman Inouye: Television

More information

BROADCASTING REFORM. Productivity Commission, Broadcasting Report No. 11, Aus Info, Canberra, Reviewed by Carolyn Lidgerwood.

BROADCASTING REFORM. Productivity Commission, Broadcasting Report No. 11, Aus Info, Canberra, Reviewed by Carolyn Lidgerwood. Reviews BROADCASTING REFORM Productivity Commission, Broadcasting Report No. 11, Aus Info, Canberra, 2000 Reviewed by Carolyn Lidgerwood When it was announced in early 1999 that the Federal Treasurer had

More information

Re: Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC : Call for comments on proposed exemption order for mobile television broadcasting undertakings

Re: Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC : Call for comments on proposed exemption order for mobile television broadcasting undertakings June 9, 2006 Ms. Diane Rhéaume Secretary General Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2 Dear Ms. Rhéaume, VIA Email procedure@crtc.gc.ca Re: Broadcasting Public

More information

Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band. Reply Comments of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre ( PIAC )

Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band. Reply Comments of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre ( PIAC ) Consultation on Reply Comments of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre ( PIAC ) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 2. Limited justification and limited support for repurposing... 1 3. Transition costs

More information

Hearing on Crafting a Successful Incentive Auction: Stakeholders Perspectives. United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

Hearing on Crafting a Successful Incentive Auction: Stakeholders Perspectives. United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Hearing on Crafting a Successful Incentive Auction: Stakeholders Perspectives United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation December 10, 2013 Statement of Rick Kaplan Executive

More information

) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA

) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of Promoting Innovation and Competition in the Provision of Multichannel Video Programming Distribution Services MB Docket No.

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Accessible Emergency Information, and Apparatus Requirements for Emergency Information and Video Description: Implementation

More information

MOBILE DIGITAL TELEVISION. never miss a minute

MOBILE DIGITAL TELEVISION. never miss a minute MOBILE DIGITAL TELEVISION never miss a minute About Mobile DTV The Power of Local TV on the Go Mobile Digital Television (DTV) represents a significant new revenue stream for the broadcasting industry

More information

UK 700MHz Strategy and Digital Terrestrial Television update. Chris Woolford, Director of International Affairs, Ofcom 3 rd October 2013

UK 700MHz Strategy and Digital Terrestrial Television update. Chris Woolford, Director of International Affairs, Ofcom 3 rd October 2013 UK 700MHz Strategy and Digital Terrestrial Television update Chris Woolford, Director of International Affairs, Ofcom 3 rd October 2013 1 Ofcom decided on its UHF strategy last year Our dual objectives

More information

House of Lords Select Committee on Communications

House of Lords Select Committee on Communications House of Lords Select Committee on Communications Inquiry into the Sustainability of Channel 4 Submission from Ben Roberts, Director BFI Film Fund on behalf of the British Film Institute Summary 1. In

More information

COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 1999

COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 1999 OCDE OECD ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC DE DÉVELOPPEMENT ÉCONOMIQUES CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 1999 BROADCASTING: Regulatory Issues Country: Germany

More information

Reply Comments from the Canadian Association of Broadcasters

Reply Comments from the Canadian Association of Broadcasters March 26, 2015 Reply Comments from the Canadian Association of Broadcasters Re: Canada Gazette, Part 1, Notice No. SLPB-005-14 Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band, publication date January 3,

More information

Netflix: Amazing Growth But At A High Price

Netflix: Amazing Growth But At A High Price Netflix: Amazing Growth But At A High Price Mar. 17, 2018 5:27 AM ET8 comments by: Jonathan Cooper Summary Amazing user growth, projected to accelerate into Q1'18. Contribution profit per subscriber continues

More information

OECD COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 2001 Broadcasting Section

OECD COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 2001 Broadcasting Section OECD COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 2001 Broadcasting Section Country: NEW ZEALAND Date completed: 1 September 2000 Broadcasting s available BROADCASTING 1. Please provide details of the broadcasting and cable

More information

Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Screen Australia s. Funding Australian Content on Small Screens : A Draft Blueprint

Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Screen Australia s. Funding Australian Content on Small Screens : A Draft Blueprint Australian Broadcasting Corporation submission to Screen Australia s Funding Australian Content on Small Screens : A Draft Blueprint January 2011 ABC submission to Screen Australia s Funding Australian

More information

. _ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE JANUARY 23, 1970 OFFICE OF THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY THE WHITE HOUSE

. _ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE JANUARY 23, 1970 OFFICE OF THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY THE WHITE HOUSE . _ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE JANUARY 23, 1970 OFFICE OF THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS CONFERENCE OF PETER M. FLANIGAN, ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT, AND CLAY T. WHITEHEAD, STAFF ASSISTANT

More information

Australian Broadcasting Corporation. submission to. National Cultural Policy Consultation

Australian Broadcasting Corporation. submission to. National Cultural Policy Consultation Australian Broadcasting Corporation submission to National Cultural Policy Consultation February 2010 Introduction The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) welcomes the opportunity to provide a submission

More information