How to write a good scientific paper: title, abstract, and keywords
|
|
- Wilfrid Hubbard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 How to write a good scientific paper: title, abstract, and keywords Chris Mack
2 How to write a good scientific paper: title, abstract, and keywords This is the first in a planned series of editorials covering all aspects of good science writing. In the era of online searches and digital libraries, the importance of a good title and abstract in a scientific paper is perhaps obvious. Yet, bad titles and poorly written abstracts are exceedingly common in the scientific and technical literature. In this editorial I ll talk about some of the common mistakes made in paper titles and abstracts, then describe a nearly foolproof approach to writing good ones. The result will be a manuscript that is more likely to be accepted by a peerreviewed journal, and a paper that is more likely to be discovered and read by the people who should. The purpose of a title and abstract is often described as selling the paper: getting someone reading the title to read the abstract, and someone reading the abstract to go further and read the paper. 1,2 I have a different viewpoint. The true purpose of the title and abstract is to get the right people to read your paper. Let s face it, 99 þ % of the scientific papers published each year are papers that I have no need and no desire to read. But there are a few papers that I shouldn t miss and those papers are different for me than for other readers. Thus, the purpose of the title and abstract is matchmaking: matching up a paper with the right readers those who want and need the information contained in the paper. As the 19th century English writer and eccentric Charles Caleb Colton said, That writer does the most who gives his reader the most information and takes from him the least time. Nothing works better than a well-written title and abstract to make sure that the wrong reader doesn t waste time on the wrong paper, and that the right reader doesn t mistakenly skip over the right paper. The title (followed by the abstract) is the first thing a reader sees, and so should be the last thing an author writes (just after the abstract). Since the abstract should be written before the title, I ll talk about abstracts first. 1 Writing an Abstract The most common mistake in writing an abstract is to not pay much attention to it. Authors sometimes consider the abstract as an afterthought, something that can be thrown together after the real manuscript is written. I ve even seen abstracts that are nothing more than the first paragraph of the introduction. Needless to say, such a poor abstract is unlikely to encourage a potential reader (or a journal editor) to venture further. The abstract should be a concise, stand-alone summary of the paper, covering the following topics: 3 background/motivation/context aim/objective(s)/problem statement approach/method(s)/procedure(s)/materials results conclusion(s)/implications (You may have noticed that these topics are the typical headings of the major sections of the paper itself. This is not a coincidence.) A typical abstract is about words (although lengths can vary depending on the journal and paper type JM 3 has a 200-word maximum), so every word must be chosen carefully. Concise and precise is a common maxim. If any one of these five components is missing from the abstract, there is chance of making a poor match between reader and paper. If the abstract is too wordy, readers may give up before finding out what the paper is all about. While I ll describe my preferred approach to the abstract in a moment, let me start by mentioning a common alternative: the newspaper lede. [The neologism lede means simply the lead (guide or beginning), and is used to distinguish between other meanings (and pronunciations) of that word.] It is conventional wisdom in the newspaper world that if you don t capture the attention of the reader in the first sentence or two, he or she will move on to another article. Thus, the lead paragraph begins with a sentence containing the main point of the piece. The second sentence contains the second most important point, etc. By the time the first paragraph is finished, the classic who, what, where, when and why questions have all been answered. This newspaper lede approach can be used in the scientific abstract as well: if I have only one sentence to convince the reader to continue reading, what would I say? Then ask the same question for each succeeding sentence. There are certainly some good abstracts that have been written using this approach, but I don t like it for two reasons. First, it takes a very good writer to make the newspaper lede form of abstract work. And most of us just aren t good enough writers to pull it off. It s also easy to leave off one of the important five topics that every abstract should contain. Thus, even an extremely wellexecuted newspaper lede-style abstract may not do the best job of matchmaking between the paper and the reader. Second, there is a better approach: the structured abstract. 2 Structured Abstracts For the past 25 years, structured abstracts have become required in most medical journals, though they are not very common in engineering and the physical sciences. 4 I hope this will change, since I am a big fan of the structured abstract. Simply put, the structured abstract formalizes the five topical areas mentioned above by adding subheadings and subsections (the structure ) into the abstract. While the exact structure can be modified to suit the topics of the journal (or even the specific paper), in engineering and physical sciences a five-structure format is probably best: background, aim, approach, results, conclusion. Each subsection should contain one to two sentences, answering the following questions: Background: What issues led to this work? What is the environment that makes this work interesting or important? Aim: What did you plan to achieve in this work? What gap is being filled? J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS Apr Jun 2012/Vol. 11(2)
3 Approach: How did you set about achieving your aims (e.g., experimental method, simulation approach, theoretical approach, combinations of these, etc.)? What did you actually do? Results: What were the main results of the study (including numbers, if appropriate)? Conclusions: What were your main conclusions? Why are the results important? Where will they lead? The benefit of the structured abstract is twofold: it forces the author to include information from all five categories, and it makes these five sections easy to find and access. But while it is logical that structured abstracts will be better than unstructured abstracts, there is in fact proof that this is so. The preeminent researcher into the efficacy of structured abstracts, James Hartley, reviewed some 31 studies that had been performed by 2004 and found that these studies demonstrated the superiority of structured abstracts. 5 His review, as well as others, 6 showed that structured abstracts contain more information; are easier to read; are easier to search; facilitate peer review; and are preferred by readers and authors. This is all well and good, but JM 3 does not use structured abstracts. Maybe it should, and maybe it will someday, but today it does not. The structured abstract is still important because it can be used in what I call the structure method of abstract writing. The method is quite simple. First, write a structured abstract. When you are finished and satisfied with the result, simply delete the subheadings and combine all the lines into one paragraph. Finally, reread this new abstract, and change sentence beginnings to increase readability and flow, if needed (though usually this will not be necessary). The result will be a well-written and effective abstract with most of the benefits of a structured abstract. To illustrate, here is an abstract for a paper that I am just now finishing. First, I wrote a structured abstract: Background: Photoresist development rate can be defined microscopically (the development rate at a point) or macroscopically (the propagation rate of an average resist height). In the presence of stochastic noise, these two rates will be different. Aim: In order to properly calibrate lithography simulators, the difference between these two definitions of development rate should be quantified. Approach: Using theoretical derivations and a stochastic (Monte Carlo) resist simulator, the propagation rate of a resist surface is characterized in the presence of stochastic variation in the resist deprotection concentration and a nonlinear development rate response. Results: The resulting propagation rate can be more than an order of magnitude higher than for the case of no stochastic noise. Correlation in the development rate creates an effective surface inhibition over a depth into the resist of several correlation lengths. Conclusions: The differences between microscopic and macroscopic dissolution rate can have an important effect on how development rate models should be calibrated, depending on their use in continuum or stochastic lithography simulators. Then, deleting the subheadings and line breaks, a traditional abstract format is obtained. I added a transition clause at the front of the last sentence to make the abstract flow better, though this small change could easily have been left out. Photoresist development rate can be defined microscopically (the development rate at a point) or macroscopically (the propagation rate of an average resist height). In the presence of stochastic noise, these two rates will be different. In order to properly calibrate lithography simulators, the difference between these two definitions of development rate should be quantified. Using theoretical derivations and a stochastic (Monte Carlo) resist simulator, the propagation rate of a resist surface is characterized in the presence of stochastic variation in the resist deprotection concentration and a nonlinear development rate response. The resulting propagation rate can be more than an order of magnitude higher than for the case of no stochastic noise. Correlation in the development rate creates an effective surface inhibition over a depth into the resist of several correlation lengths. These results show that the differences between microscopic and macroscopic dissolution rate can have an important effect on how development rate models should be calibrated, depending on their use in continuum or stochastic lithography simulators.note that while structured abstracts are typically longer than traditional ones, the 166-word length here is right on target for most journals. If anything, the approach and results sections could have been expanded slightly. Additionally, the structured method of abstract writing also helps to avoid useless but all-too-common phrases like in this paper and we report or will be discussed. The abstract should talk about the work, not about the paper; phrases like is discussed turn your abstract into a table of contents rather than a summary of the paper. Do not use the first person ( I or we or the author ). Also, there is rarely a need to use phrases like new or novel in the abstract, since it is only the novel results that should be mentioned. You know that you are finished writing the abstract when there are no words that could be taken out without changing the meaning. 3 Important Additional Thoughts on Abstracts Why should the abstract be written after the entire paper is complete? The reason is simple: if not, it is unlikely that the abstract will be accurate. A study of six highly regarded medical journals in 1999 found that about 40% of the abstracts studied contained information inconsistent with the body of the paper, or information not found in the body of the paper, or both. 7 The most likely cause of these J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS Apr Jun 2012/Vol. 11(2)
4 errors, after just plain sloppiness, would be changes made to the paper after the abstract was written. Such errors and inconsistencies can largely be avoided by leaving the abstract-writing task till after the body of the manuscript is completely finished. The structured abstract can help make the abstract more informative, but it is still up to the diligence of the authors (and journal editors and reviewers) to make sure the abstract is accurate. There is a three-part test that should be applied to your abstract when you are finished: 1. Is all of the information in the abstract consistent with what is written in the body of the paper? 2. Can all of the information found in the abstract also be found in the body of the paper? 3. Is the important information of the paper found in the abstract? Are any key words from the paper missing from the abstract? The abstract must be self-contained, and in general should not contain citations to other papers. If a citation is required (for example, if the paper is a response to a previous publication), the full citation must be embedded in the abstract. Do not use abbreviations or acronyms in the abstract, or at the least spell them out the first time they are used. Do not refer to figures or tables from the body of the paper, or use words or descriptions that will only make sense after the full paper has been read. Trademarked terms should be avoided as well. As for all writing, keep the audience in mind. If you are writing a spectroscopy paper for a spectroscopy journal, you can surmise that all of your readers will be spectroscopists, with a certain background knowledge assumed. A paper on that same topic for a more general optics journal may require an extra sentence in the background section to inform the reader that the topic is within the field of spectroscopy, within a certain subfield, etc. Finally, an important goal of the abstract (and the title to be discussed next) is to make the abstract as specific as possible while still describing the full range of work reported in the body of the paper. If the paper measures only thickness uniformity of a film, the abstract should not make the more general claim that the paper measures film uniformity. If the paper simulates the scattering properties of one-dimensional gratings (but not more general objects), an abstract that merely states that scattering simulations were performed could mislead the reader into thinking that the work was applicable to more general objects. On the other hand, if the thickness and compositional uniformity of the film were measured, saying only thickness uniformity in the abstract is too limiting and does not describe the full scope of the paper. 4 Titles When the abstract is written, it is now time to write the title. Unfortunately, it is against human nature to write the title last. Instead, the title is often the first thing written, at the top of that blank document that will soon become your manuscript. It is important to consider these first words as the working title. When the manuscript, and the abstract, are finished, it will almost surely be necessary to revise the title. It is probably impossible to define a universal procedure for creating a good title there is no equivalent structure method for writing a title. There are some basic guidelines, however, that make use of the structured abstract to guide the creation of the title. In general, the title should reflect the aim and approach of the work. Depending on the audience (and the specificity of the journal), some of the background may have to be included. Rarely are results and conclusions even hinted at in the title. Let s look at each of these items through the use of an example. Unlike the worlds of newspaper reporting and marketing press releases, the title of a scientific paper should describe the aim of the work, not the results. Thus, a good title might be Impact of temperature and pressure on the compositional uniformity of sputter-deposited aluminum alloys The following news-style title, on the other hand, is not appropriate: Optimizing temperature and pressure improves sputter-deposited aluminum alloy films Note that the good title is essentially a statement of the aim of the work. Often it is important to mention the approach used as well, though an experimental approach is generally assumed if it is not mentioned. If the study had been based on simulation (or some other approach), however, this would generally be included in the title: Impact of temperature and pressure on the simulated compositional uniformity of sputter-deposited aluminum alloys The title should be as specific as possible while still describing the full range of the work. For example, if only one aluminum alloy was being studied, that specific alloy should be mentioned in the title. If only aluminum alloys are studied, the title shouldn t say sputter-deposited metals or sputterdeposited alloys. On the other hand, the title shouldn t say aluminum alloys if gold was also included in the study. If the title had said uniformity rather than compositional uniformity, the reader could easily have believed that the paper was about thickness uniformity or some other parameter. And if only sputter deposition was studied, then leaving this information out would make the title insufficiently specific. A conflicting goal of the title is to be as short as possible (in 2011, JM 3 titles ranged from 4 to 21 words in length, with an average length of 11.5). Specificity can often be improved through the use of more words, but a title that is too lengthy may not be read. 8 Finding the best compromise between descriptiveness and brevity is where the art of authorship comes in to play. Going back to our example, here is a title that sacrifices too much specificity to obtain brevity: Impact of process parameters on the uniformity of aluminum alloys A good test for your title is to answer these questions: Does the title of your manuscript, seen in isolation, give a J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS Apr Jun 2012/Vol. 11(2)
5 full yet concise and specific indication of the work reported? Would someone interested in the exact topic of your paper, reading this title, be inclined to read the abstract? Avoid being overly clever with the title a pun or a play on words may be great fun, but it is unlikely to help your article be found by a search engine (and can be easily misunderstood by an international audience). Titles should also be free of jargon unlikely to be understood by those not intimately familiar with the topic, and should not contain acronyms or trademarked terms. The overall goal should be a title that is clear and informative. 5 Keywords This brings up the next topic keywords (also called subject terms ). We are quickly passing out of the days when most people find your article by flipping through the print version of the journal. Today, your article is unlikely to be widely read unless it comes up relatively high on a Google or Google Scholar search-results list. The first and most important thing you can do to insure that your article is found by readers looking for it is to do a good job of writing the abstract and title. Following the advice given above should help. After that, you must decide on appropriate keywords. The important idea behind identifying the key words to be listed under the abstract as subject terms is simple: if you were looking for an article on exactly the topic of your manuscript, what key words would you type into a search engine in order to find it? Chances are, you would start with only two to four words or phrases. If that resulted in too many hits, or too many off-scope articles, then you would refine your search by adding one or two more phrases. These are the words or phrases (plus all of their common variants and synonyms) that should be included in the list of subject terms. Once you have a good list of keywords, go back and look at your title and abstract. Are these keywords found in the title and abstract? If not, someone searching for your article may easily miss it. The most important keywords should be found in the title, and in the abstract several times. 6 Summary A structured abstract is a proven way to give readers the information they need in an accessible and readable format. The structure method of abstract writing proposed here can provide many of the benefits of a structured abstract for journals (like JM 3 ) that do not (yet) use structured abstracts. This structure can also aid in the writing of the title, using information from the aim and approach subsections. To be sure, I have made just about every mistake described in this editorial. But I can certainly tell that as I have adopted the structure method of abstract writing my abstracts have become far more informative and useful. And if I keep practicing my own advice, I suspect that I will continue to improve. Someday, JM 3 may adopt a formal structured abstract for all papers. Until then, I think the structure method of abstract writing described here might help you as much as it has helped me. Combined with a properly devised title, you will then have a paper that is off to a very good start. Chris Mack Editor-in-Chief References 1. R. G. Driggers, Editorial: how do you write a great abstract and why is it important?, Opt. Eng. 49(6), (2010). 2. W. Rhodes, Editorial: the abstract as a marketing tool, Opt. Eng. 49(7), (2010). 3. National Information Standards Organization, Guidelines for abstracts, ANSII/NISO Standard (1997). 4. R. N. Kostoff and J. Hartley, Open letter to technical journal editors regarding structured abstracts: this letter proposes that structured abstracts be required for all technical journal articles, J. Inform. Sci. 28(3), (2002). 5. J. Hartley, Current findings from research on structured abstracts, J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 92(3), (2004). 6. C. Zhang and X. Liu, Review of James Hartley s research on structured abstracts, J. Inform. Sci. 37(6), (2011). 7. R. M. Pitkin, M. A. Branagan, and L. F. Burmeister, Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 281(12), (1999). 8. H. R. Jamali and M. Nikzad, Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations, Scientometrics 88(2), (2011). J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS Apr Jun 2012/Vol. 11(2)
1/20/2010 WHY SHOULD WE PUBLISH AT ALL? WHY PUBLISH? INNOVATION ANALOGY HOW TO WRITE A PUBLISHABLE PAPER?
WHY SHOULD WE PUBLISH AT ALL? HOW TO WRITE A PUBLISHABLE PAPER? ANDREW KUSIAK THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY, IA 52242-1527 USA ANDREW-KUSIAK@UIOWA.EDU WWW.ICAEN.UIOWA.EDU/~ANKUSIAK Could academia survive
More informationWhy Publish in Journals? How to write a technical paper. How about Theses and Reports? Where Should I Publish? General Considerations: Tone and Style
How to write a technical paper Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi Department of Electrical Engineering University of Washington http://cialab.org Why Publish in Journals? Research is complete only when the results
More informationWrite to be read. Dr B. Pochet. BSA Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech - ULiège. Write to be read B. Pochet
Write to be read Dr B. Pochet BSA Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech - ULiège 1 2 The supports http://infolit.be/write 3 The processes 4 The processes 5 Write to be read barriers? The title: short, attractive, representative
More informationWhat is Scientific Writing?
What is Scientific Writing? Scientific writing is the culmination or end product of scientific research. Scientists pose questions and then perform experiments to answer their questions. The results that
More informationGuidelines for Manuscript Preparation for Advanced Biomedical Engineering
Guidelines for Manuscript Preparation for Advanced Biomedical Engineering May, 2012. Editorial Board of Advanced Biomedical Engineering Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering 1. Introduction
More informationINFORMATION FOR AUTHORS
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS Instructions for Authors from the Board of Editors Natural Resources & Environment (NR&E) is the quarterly magazine published by the Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources
More informationThe section can be divided into subsections:
APPENDIX E Instructions on how to write the report Below is a summary of main functions and contents of the parts of a scientific report. Try to write in a CONCISE, PRECISE, CLEAR, and CONSISTENT way!
More informationGUIDELINES FOR AUTHOR
(An International Peer Review Journal for Bio-Medical and Pharmaceutical Professionals) GUIDELINES FOR AUTHOR British Journal of Bio-Medical Research (BJBMR) is a Bimonthly journal which publishes original
More informationHow to write a scientific paper
How to write a scientific paper A scientific experiment is not complete until the results have been published and understood. A scientific paper is a written and published report describing original research
More informationInternational Journal of Modern Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR)
International Journal of Modern Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) GUIDELINES FOR AUTHOR International Journal of Modern Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is a Bimonthly Research Journal which publishes original
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS Contents 1. AIMS AND SCOPE 1 2. TYPES OF PAPERS 2 2.1. Original research articles 2 2.2. Review articles and Drug Reviews 2 2.3. Case reports and case snippets 2 2.4. Viewpoints
More informationAraştırma Yöntemleri ve Bilimsel Etik
Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Bilimsel Etik Yrd. Doç. Dr. Z. Cihan TAYŞİ (Slides mostly based on How to Write & Publish a Scientific Paper by Robert A. Day.) 1 Scientific Writing What is it? Origins of scientific
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS Contents 1. AIMS AND SCOPE 1 2. TYPES OF PAPERS 2 2.1. Original Research 2 2.2. Reviews and Drug Reviews 2 2.3. Case Reports and Case Snippets 2 2.4. Viewpoints 3 2.5. Letters
More informationPeer Review Process in Medical Journals
Korean J Fam Med. 2013;34:372-376 http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.6.372 Peer Review Process in Medical Journals Review Young Gyu Cho, Hyun Ah Park* Department of Family Medicine, Inje University
More informationHow to Write a Good. Scientific Paper. Chris A. Mack
How to Write a Good Scientific Paper Chris A. Mack SPIE Terms of Use: This SPIE ebook is DRM-free for your convenience. You may install this ebook on any device you own, but not post it publicly or transmit
More informationPublic Administration Review Information for Contributors
Public Administration Review Information for Contributors About the Journal Public Administration Review (PAR) is dedicated to advancing theory and practice in public administration. PAR serves a wide
More informationHow to Prepare a Good Scientific Manuscript - Some Thoughts
How to Prepare a Good Scientific Manuscript - Some Thoughts Kai Sundmacher 1,2 1 Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Department of Process Systems Engineering 2 Otto-von-Guericke
More informationJournal Papers. The Primary Archive for Your Work
Journal Papers The Primary Archive for Your Work Audience Equal peers (reviewers and readers) Peer-reviewed before publication Typically 1 or 2 iterations with reviewers before acceptance Write so that
More informationPublishing Your Research in Peer-Reviewed Journals: The Basics of Writing a Good Manuscript.
Publishing Your Research in Peer-Reviewed Journals: The Basics of Writing a Good Manuscript The Main Points Strive for written language perfection Expect to be rejected Make changes and resubmit What is
More informationHOW TO WRITE A SCIENTIFIC PAPER
HOW TO WRITE A SCIENTIFIC PAPER introduction What is a Scientific Paper? a scientific paper is a written and published report describing original research results Why to write (and publish) a Scientific
More informationScientific paper writing - Abstract and Extended abstract
Scientific paper writing - Abstract and Extended abstract Assoc. Prof. Almin Đapo 1 st International Doctoral Seminar in the field of Geodesy, Geoinformatics and Geospace Centre for Advanced Academic Studies
More informationOptical Engineering Review Form
Optical Engineering Review Form I. Journalistic Criteria I.A. Appropriateness for OE I.B. Quality of writing (English language) I.C. Clarity (including organization of material) I.D. Conciseness (length
More informationFrom Research to Manuscript
Michael Jay Katz From Research to Manuscript A Guide to Scientific Writing Springer Contents Acknowledgements v Part I Tools and Techniques 1 The Standards of a Scientific Paper 3 1. A Stereotyped Format
More informationHow to Publish a Great Journal Article. Parker J. Wigington, Jr., Ph.D. JAWRA Editor-in-Chief
How to Publish a Great Journal Article Parker J. Wigington, Jr., Ph.D. JAWRA Editor-in-Chief Agenda Ethics Choosing the right journal Writing your paper Submitting your paper Navigating the peer review
More informationHow to get published Preparing your manuscript. Bart Wacek Publishing Director, Biochemistry
How to get published Preparing your manuscript Bart Wacek Publishing Director, Biochemistry b.wacek@elsevier.com 2 Academic publishing What is peer review? Peer review consists of the evaluation of articles
More informationInstructions for Manuscript Preparation
Instructions for Manuscript Preparation Advanced Biomedical Engineering May, 2012. May, 2014. 1. Format Use a page size corresponding to A4. Start the title page and abstract from the first page, followed
More informationQuestions about these materials may be directed to the Obstetrics & Gynecology editorial office:
NOTICE: This document contains comments from the reviewers and editors generated during peer review of the initial manuscript submission and sent to the author via email. Questions about these materials
More informationPublishing a Journal Article
Publishing a Journal Article Akhlesh Lakhtakia Pennsylvania State University There is no tried and tested way of publishing solid journal articles that works for everyone and in every discipline or subdiscipline.
More informationOriginal Research (not to exceed 3,000 words) Manuscripts describing original research should include the following sections:
Guide for Authors Article Categories How to Submit a Manuscript for Peer Review Author Responsibilities Manuscript Preparation Journal Style How to Submit Commentary and Letters Editorial Process The Canadian
More informationWriting & Submitting a Paper for a Peer Reviewed Life Sciences Journal
Writing & Submitting a Paper for a Peer Reviewed Life Sciences Journal Charles H. Emerson, MD Editor-in-Chief Thyroid, The Official Journal of the American Thyroid Association thyroideditor@umassmed.edu
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE (IJEE)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE (IJEE) AUTHORS GUIDELINES 1. INTRODUCTION The International Journal of Educational Excellence (IJEE) is open to all scientific articles which provide answers
More informationJournal of Undergraduate Research Submission Acknowledgment Form
FIRST 4-5 WORDS OF TITLE IN ALL CAPS 1 Journal of Undergraduate Research Submission Acknowledgment Form Contact information Student name(s): Primary email: Secondary email: Faculty mentor name: Faculty
More informationAlso highly recommended: Graphing Resources ( homepage.htm), particularly their Revising your Visuals section.
When feasible, put important points and conclusions in graphical form. Not everyone reads an entire article from beginning to end. When readers skim through an article, they are drawn to the figures. Try
More informationInstructions to Authors
Instructions to Authors Manuscript categories Articles published in Limnology and Oceanography: Methods fall into several categories. Descriptions of new methods Many manuscripts will fall into this category
More informationJOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION AUTHOR GUIDELINES
SURESH GYAN VIHAR UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION Instructions to Authors: AUTHOR GUIDELINES The JPRE is an international multidisciplinary Monthly Journal, which publishes
More informationFormal Lab Report Instructions
Formal Lab Report Instructions The following eight pages of instructions are formatted like your formal lab report. The format is deliberately plain to the point of being ugly. Reports generally undergo
More informationScholarly Paper Publication
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful Scholarly Paper Publication Seyyed Mohammad Hasheminejad, Acoustics Research Lab Mechanical Engineering Department, Iran University of Science & Technology
More informationRunning head: SHORTENED TITLE 1. Title of Paper. Student Name. Austin Peay State University
Running head: SHORTENED TITLE 1 Title of Paper Student Name Austin Peay State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for EDUC 5000 Spring 2015 Dr. John R. McConnell III SHORTENED TITLE 2
More information(If applicable Symposium-in-Print, Invited Review, or Research Note) Your Manuscript Title Goes Here
(Please include page numbers in the center of your document) (If applicable Symposium-in-Print, Invited Review, or Research Note) Your Manuscript Title Goes Here List of authors names, first-name first,
More informationHow to be More Prolific A Strategy for Writing and Publishing Scientific Papers
How to be More Prolific A Strategy for Writing and Publishing Scientific Papers William F. Laurance Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Balboa, Panamá Agenda A few words about data analysis Finding
More informationAutomatically Creating Biomedical Bibliographic Records from Printed Volumes of Old Indexes
Automatically Creating Biomedical Bibliographic Records from Printed Volumes of Old Indexes Daniel X. Le and George R. Thoma National Library of Medicine Bethesda, MD 20894 ABSTRACT To provide online access
More informationJudicial Writing Manual: A Pocket Guide for Judges
Judicial Writing Manual: A Pocket Guide for Judges Second Edition Federal Judicial Center 2013 This Federal Judicial Center publication was undertaken in furtherance of the Center s statutory mission to
More informationInformation Ecology and Libraries October 2011
Arkadiusz Pulikowski Department of Library and Information Studies University of Silesia Katowice, Poland Information Ecology and Libraries 10-12 October 2011 inspiration, abstract in ISO, NISO standards
More informationAuthor Instruction. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (WJPPS) publishes the following manuscript types:
Author Instruction The WORLD JOURNAL PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE (WJPPS) is a Bimonthly published online Research Journal, which publishes innovative research papers, reviews, mini-reviews, short
More informationHow to Write a Paper for a Forensic Damages Journal
Draft, March 5, 2001 How to Write a Paper for a Forensic Damages Journal Thomas R. Ireland Department of Economics University of Missouri at St. Louis 8001 Natural Bridge Road St. Louis, MO 63121 Tel:
More informationPreparing a Paper for Publication. Julie A. Longo, Technical Writer Sue Wainscott, STEM Librarian
Preparing a Paper for Publication Julie A. Longo, Technical Writer Sue Wainscott, STEM Librarian Most engineers assume that one form of technical writing will be sufficient for all types of documents.
More informationAmerican Chemical Society Publication Guidelines
American Chemical Society Publication Guidelines TITLE. The title should accurately, clearly, and concisely reflect the emphasis and content of the paper. The title must be brief and grammatically correct
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS (i)introduction
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS (i)introduction Oriental Journal of Chemistry an international, open access, peer reviewed research journal of pure and applied chemistry, is published quarterly with the aim of
More informationHow to write a scientific paper for an international journal
How to write a scientific paper for an international journal PEERASAK CHAIPRASART Good Scientist Research 1 Why publish? If you publish, people understand that you can do your job If you publish, you have
More informationJournal of Advanced Chemical Sciences
Journal of Advanced Chemical Sciences (www.jacsdirectory.com) Guide for Authors ISSN: 2394-5311 Journal of Advanced Chemical Sciences (JACS) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers, case studies,
More informationTHE NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY GUIDE TO THE PREPARATION OF THESES. Office of Graduate Education and Research. Revised March, 2018
THE NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY GUIDE TO THE PREPARATION OF THESES By Office of Graduate Education and Research Revised March, 2018 2006 Northern Michigan University 1 PREFACE The following guidelines
More informationAre you ready to Publish? Understanding the publishing process. Presenter: Andrea Hoogenkamp-OBrien
Are you ready to Publish? Understanding the publishing process Presenter: Andrea Hoogenkamp-OBrien February, 2015 2 Outline The publishing process Before you begin Plagiarism - What not to do After Publication
More informationStyle Guide Analysis
Style Guide Analysis Technical Communication 402 Technical Editing Paul A. McWilliams Winter 2004 Introduction A style guide is a document, book, or website designed to be used by writers and editors within
More informationPage 1 of 5 AUTHOR GUIDELINES OXFORD RESEARCH ENCYCLOPEDIA OF NEUROSCIENCE
Page 1 of 5 AUTHOR GUIDELINES OXFORD RESEARCH ENCYCLOPEDIA OF NEUROSCIENCE Your Contract Please make sure you have signed your digital contract. If you would like to add a co-author, please notify the
More information1 Capitol Mall Suite 800 Sacramento, CA p f
1 Capitol Mall Suite 800 Sacramento, CA 95814 p 916.440.0826 f 916.444.7462 www.mvcac.org May 15, 2015 Subject: Call for Proceedings Papers To: MVCAC Membership It is time to begin preparation of the Proceedings
More informationMBARARA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Proposal, Thesis, and Dissertation Guidelines
MBARARA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Proposal, Thesis, and Dissertation Guidelines 2016 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 2 USING THE SCHOLARLY LITERATURE... 1 2.1 Searching the scholarly literature...
More informationCIT Thesis and Directed Project Formatting Checklist Last Updated: 4/20/17 10:59:00 AM
CIT Thesis and Directed Project Formatting Checklist Last Updated: 4/20/17 10:59:00 AM This checklist has been developed to help you avoid formatting errors that can result in the Graduate School s rejection
More informationTypes of Publications
Types of Publications Articles Communications Reviews ; Review Articles Mini-Reviews Highlights Essays Perspectives Book, Chapters by same Author(s) Edited Book, Chapters by different Authors(s) JACS Communication
More informationInstructions to Authors for Manuscript Preparation 37th International Symposium on Combustion
The Combustion Institute 5001 Baum Boulevard, Suite 644 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-1851 USA Ph: (412) 687-1366 Fax: (412) 687-0340 Office@CombustionInstitute.org CombustionInstitute.org Instructions
More informationENSC 105W: PROCESS, FORM, AND CONVENTION IN PROFESSIONAL GENRES
ENSC 105W: PROCESS, FORM, AND CONVENTION IN PROFESSIONAL GENRES Library Research Workshop Alison Moore Applied Science Librarian ajm30@sfu.ca Getting started with library research TWO QUESTIONS: Where
More informationMalaysian E Commerce Journal
Malaysian E Commerce Journal (http:///) Due to rapid advances in scientific E Commerce, there is more need of advanced and durable study in technology and E Commerce field. Malaysian E Commerce Journal
More informationSo what is the problem?
So what is the problem? Paul Haddad, Editor, Journal of Chromatography A A great deal of excellent research is submitted from China but. I have encountered the following serious issues Multiple submissions
More informationWhy Should I Choose the Paper Category?
Updated January 2018 What is a Historical Paper? A History Fair paper is a well-written historical argument, not a biography or a book report. The process of writing a History Fair paper is similar to
More informationWriting Cover Letters
Writing Cover Letters Outline What is a cover letter? Content Style/format Summary 2 What is cover a letter? Most journals require that a cover letter be submitted along with each manuscript submitted
More informationHow to write a Master Thesis in the European Master in Law and Economics Programme
Academic Year 2017/2018 How to write a Master Thesis in the European Master in Law and Economics Programme Table of Content I. Introduction... 2 II. Formal requirements... 2 1. Length... 2 2. Font size
More informationSCIENTIFIC WRITING AND PUBLISHING IN JOURNALS
SCIENTIFIC WRITING AND PUBLISHING IN JOURNALS Professor Dr. Mohd Ali Hassan (MA Hassan) Professor Dr. Tan Soon Guan (SG Tan) Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences alihas@upm.edu.my Universiti
More informationIJSHS Guidance for Submission
IJSHS Guidance for Submission 1. Submission 1.1. All submissions and reviews are done online in "IJSHS". Access the following website and submit your manuscript by the step-by-step instruction. https://www.editorialmanager.com/ijshs/
More informationBibliometric analysis of publications from North Korea indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 1988 to 2016
pissn 2288-8063 eissn 2288-7474 Sci Ed 2017;4(1):24-29 https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.85 Original Article Bibliometric analysis of publications from North Korea indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection
More informationPeer Review of PRIMARY LITERATURE STYLE PAPERS BIO303 Fall 2011
Guidelines: This peer reviews are completed anonymously. The goal of this process is to help the author(s) to write a more clear, more readable, paper. As you are working on this review, you should keep
More informationGuidelines for Authors Submitting Manuscripts to the Journal of Medical English Education
Guidelines for Authors Submitting Manuscripts to the Journal of Medical English Education 1. Article categories and Journal aims The Journal of Medical English Education, the official publication of the
More informationPublication Policy and Guidelines for Authors
Publication Policy and Guidelines for Authors The IASLIC Bulletin is a peer-reviewed journal in the field of Library and Information Science published quarterly by the Indian Association of Special Libraries
More informationJournal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice
Author Guidelines Articles Our guidelines follow to a great extent the conventions of the American Psychological Association. If in doubt please consult: Publication manual of the American Psychological
More informationQuality Of Manuscripts and Editorial Process
TITLE OF PRESENTATION Quality Of Manuscripts and Editorial Process How Editorial Project Managers facilitate the publishing process from its beginning to the end Presented By Mariana Kühl Leme Date September
More informationAlternate Assignment to Freshman Paper
2018-19 Alternate Assignment to Freshman Paper Purpose: The goal of this project is to have RCHS students find and use detailed and reliable information from multiple sources to help them form a conclusion
More informationWriting Styles Simplified Version MLA STYLE
Writing Styles Simplified Version MLA STYLE MLA, Modern Language Association, style offers guidelines of formatting written work by making use of the English language. It is concerned with, page layout
More informationNew Jersey Pediatrics publishes the following types of articles:
New Jersey Pediatrics GUIDE FOR AUTHORS INTRODUCTION New Jersey Pediatrics, the official journal of the New Jersey Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics The Journal, is distributed statewide to the Chapter
More informationGENERAL WRITING FORMAT
GENERAL WRITING FORMAT The doctoral dissertation should be written in a uniform and coherent manner. Below is the guideline for the standard format of a doctoral research paper: I. General Presentation
More informationUnderstanding Plagiarism
Understanding Plagiarism What it is and how to avoid it Written by Sydney Sherman Graduate Research Assistant and TA in the Department of Astronomy University of Texas at Austin November 20, 2015 Contents
More informationPart III: How to Present in the Health Sciences
CONTENTS Preface Foreword xvii xix 1. An Overview of Writing and Publishing in the Health Sciences 1 Part I: How to Write in the Health Sciences 2. How to Write Effectively: Making Reading Easier 29 3.
More informationStudent and Early Career Researcher Workshop:
Student and Early Career Researcher Workshop: Publishing and Reviewing in International Journals. Presented by: Prof. Mike Elliott, University of Hull, UK Prof. Victor de Jonge, University of Hull, UK
More informationHow to be an effective reviewer
How to be an effective reviewer Peer reviewing for academic journals Gareth Meager, Editorial Systems Manager After authors, reviewers are the lifeblood of any journal. Mike J. Smith, Editor-in-Chief,
More informationGeological Magazine. Guidelines for reviewers
Geological Magazine Guidelines for reviewers We very much appreciate your agreement to act as peer reviewer for an article submitted to Geological Magazine. These guidelines are intended to summarise the
More informationPublishing: A Behind the Scenes Look, and Tips for New Faculty
Publishing: A Behind the Scenes Look, and Tips for New Faculty Deborah M. Figart, Faculty Fellow, Institute for Faculty Development Co-Editor, Review of Social Economy A Typical Journal Review Process
More informationCharacterization and improvement of unpatterned wafer defect review on SEMs
Characterization and improvement of unpatterned wafer defect review on SEMs Alan S. Parkes *, Zane Marek ** JEOL USA, Inc. 11 Dearborn Road, Peabody, MA 01960 ABSTRACT Defect Scatter Analysis (DSA) provides
More informationEthical Policy for the Journals of the London Mathematical Society
Ethical Policy for the Journals of the London Mathematical Society This document is a reference for Authors, Referees, Editors and publishing staff. Part 1 summarises the ethical policy of the journals
More informationExamples of Section, Subsection and Third-Tier Headings
STYLE GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS OF THE AWA REVIEW June 22, 2016 The style of a document can be characterized by two distinctly different aspects the layout and format of papers, which is addressed here, and
More informationDelta Journal of Education 1 ISSN
Author(s) Last Name(s) Volume 7, Issue 1, Spring, 2017 1 Delta Journal of Education 1 ISSN 2160-9179 Published by Delta State University Title of Paper, size 18 NTR * font First Author a, Second Author
More informationPublishing Your Research
Publishing Your Research Writing a scientific paper and submitting to the right journal Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam November 2016 Publishing Your Research 2016 Page 2 Publishing Scientific Articles The
More informationGuidelines for Reviewers
YJBM Guidelines for Reviewers 1 Guidelines for Reviewers Table of Contents Mission and Scope of YJBM 2 The Peer-Review Process at YJBM 2 Expectations of a Reviewer for YJBM 3 Points to Consider When Reviewing
More informationAuthor Directions: Navigating your success from PhD to Book
Author Directions: Navigating your success from PhD to Book SNAPSHOT 5 Key Tips for Turning your PhD into a Successful Monograph Introduction Some PhD theses make for excellent books, allowing for the
More informationTurn Your Idea into a Publication
The Publishing Process: An Editor s Behind the Scenes Overview Presented by Mary Beth Weber, Editor, Library Resources and Technical Services Turn Your Idea into a Publication an ALCTS Virtual Symposium
More informationIZA World of Labor: Author guidelines
IZA World of Labor: Author guidelines Description of the project IZA World of Labor (WoL) aims to inform society and to guide decision makers in labor related questions and help them make their decisions
More informationProceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics Volume 6, 2009 http://asa.aip.org 157th Meeting Acoustical Society of America Portland, Oregon 18-22 May 2009 Session 4aID: Interdisciplinary 4aID4. Preparing a submission
More information2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Writing and Publishing in High Impact Journal Why we need to publish Requirement for graduation Requirement for promotion To get reward/award To be recognized To disseminate knowledge
More informationAUTHOR SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
AUTHOR SUBMISSION GUIDELINES The following author guidelines apply to all those who submit an article to the International Journal of Indigenous Health (IJIH). For the current Call for Papers, prospective
More informationHow to write & publish a scientific paper
How to write & publish a scientific paper Dr. Haytham A. Zakai Medical Technology Program Faculty of Medicine & Allied Sciences 1 Content What is scientific writing What is a scientific paper How to list
More informationBefore submitting the manuscript please read Pakistan Heritage Submission Guidelines.
Before submitting the manuscript please read Pakistan Heritage Submission Guidelines. If you have any question or problem related to the submission process please contact Pakistan Heritage Editorial office
More informationArticle accepted in September 2016, to appear in Scientometrics. doi: /s x
Article accepted in September 2016, to appear in Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2116-x Are two authors better than one? Can writing in pairs affect the readability of academic blogs? James Hartley
More informationHERE UNDER SETS GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR WRITING AND SUBMISSION OF A TECHNICAL REPORT
Rwanda Engineering Council In Partnership with Institution of Engineers Rwanda HERE UNDER SETS GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR WRITING AND SUBMISSION OF A TECHNICAL REPORT As a partial requirement towards
More informationMaster's thesis and seminar in computer science. About the master's thesis and the writing process
Master's thesis and seminar in computer science About the master's thesis and the writing process Seminar leader: Marina Waldén Literature on writing theses Mikael Berndtsson, Jörgen Hansson, Björn Olsson
More information