Reconstructing the hermeneutic circle: Towards a dialogical methodology of interpretation, knowledge and communication
|
|
- Lucas George Montgomery
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A version of this was adapted as Richards, C. (1994). Reconstructing the Hermeneutic Circle, Australasian Philosophy Papers, ed. A. Duckworth, University of Queensland. Reconstructing the hermeneutic circle: Towards a dialogical methodology of interpretation, knowledge and communication This phrase ['which answers to which questions fits the facts'] is in fact the hermeneutical Urphanomen: No assertion is possible that cannot be understood as an answer to a question, and assertions can only be understood in this way. It does not impair the impressive methodology [of science ] in the least. Whoever wants to learn a science has to master its methodology. But we also know that methodology does not guarantee in any way the productivity of its application. Any experience of life can confirm the fact that there is such a thing as methodological sterility, that is, the application of a method to something not really worth knowing, to something that has not been made an object of investigation on the basis of a genuine question. (Hans-Georg Gadamer) The concept of the hermeneutic circle refers to the problem of how to interpret the transfer, mediation or communication of discursive, textual or conventional meanings, across time and space as well as across different traditions, frameworks or actual contexts of significance. Does human meaning ever remain the same, or is always indeterminate and merely contingent? Is meaning a closed circle or an open one, a vicious circle or a productive one? How can we ever understand or know anything unfamiliar? How can we interpret the actions of others - especially when they occur in a different cultural or historical context? Is it ever possible to escape our implicit preconceptions or stereotypes when we interpret an event, a text, or reality generally, when we interact with others or with the world, when we reason as a problem-solving strategy? In short, the basic methodological problem represented by the hermeneutic circle is whether an act of interpretation, communication, knowledge (or, indeed, critical reasoning) can ever take place independently of a specific context - that is, in a critical, value-free vacuum? In this paper I will consider the relevance of Gadamer and Ricoeur's related projects to reconstruct the hermeneutic circle within the framework of a dialogical methodology. My initial focus will be to distinguish such a strategy from both the objectivist framework of romanticist hermeneutics, and the relativist hermeneutics of Heidegger (the latter providing the key point of departure for both men). In order to suggest the relevance of a dialogical framework for other philosophical traditions and various intellectual disciplines, it is especially useful to locate the hermeneutic circle as a problem of critical reasoning 1. Indeed, both objectivist and relativist conceptions of this problem have been identified in the analytic tradition 2. I will identify and develop the key assumptions of a 1 To the extent that they reflect a new abstract notion of analogy (in place of mythical or explicitly metaphorical thought), Zeno's paradoxes may be considered to mark the historical closure of the hermeneutic circle in terms of the construction of arbitrary (spatial vs. temporal) distinctions for defining such concepts as irrationality and infinite regression in western thought. 2 The problem of the inherently circularity or infinite regression of reason - a significant aspect of the hermeneutic circle - has also been a focus of an analytatic tradition as well. The explicit circularity of reasoning was identified by Bertrand Russell in relation to the problem of logical paradox as the vicious circle principle within in his theory of logical types. This objectivist conception can be identified in terms of the threat of infinite regression which characterises the tautology of deductive method, the reduction of terms into meaninglessness and absurdity, and the clinging to a belief in an ideal language or framework of commensurability and verification. But did the relativist and indeterminist philosophies of a whole range of modern philosophers who challenged this framework escape from it? A number of people have identified 1 21C Knowledge-Building Cameron Richards global knowledge convergence project
2 dialogical reconstruction of the hermeneutic circle in terms of two exemplary concepts of such a model - Ricoeur's concept of metaphorical reference and Gadamer's notion of selfunderstanding 3. Beyond objectivist or relativist conceptions of the hermeneutic circle The concept of the hermeneutic circle became significant through its use by Friedric Schleiermacher 4, at the beginning of the nineteenth century, to reformulate the project of hermeneutics within the context of the early nineteenth-century romantic German tradition of philology and related disciplines (grammar, rhetoric, history, etc.) in particular, and as part of a general strategy (later made explicit by Wilhem Dilthey) to construct a methodological foundation for the human sciences 5. It is helpful here to distinguish between the use of this term to describe an ontological dilemma of alterity, self-reference and infinite regress, and an epistemological problem of how knowledge and understanding are transferred, mediated or communicated. Romantics such as Schleiermacher, who conceived the circularity of part-whole relations, tended to confuse - or uncritically alternate between - these distinct different senses in terms of an intersubjective model of communication 6. In contrast, Heidegger isolated and focused on the ontological dilemma of the hermeneutic circle, a phenomenological model grounded in the existential constitution of Dasein 7. Dialogical reconstructions of the hermeneutic circle by both Gadamer and Ricoeur can be seen as a convergent attempt to rescue it from the objectivist and relativist views of the romantics and Heidegger respectively 8. The romanticist model generally conceived the hermeneutic circle in terms of human understanding (verstehen). This was expressed by Humbold's famous dictum that in order to understand, we must already in some sense have understood. Just as the romanticist model focused on the subjective pole of understanding, Dilthey turned to the objective pole in his efforts to develop a general methodology. He increasingly conceived the hermeneutic circle as a logical rather than historical or sociological transformation. Although he recognised that any act of interpretation - even by the most naively objectivist or critically relativist construction of knowledge - involved a productive rather than vicious circle of understanding to some degree, Dilthey came to 2 within a relativist framework the infinite regression that characterises reasoning by induction or inference (e.g. W. V. Quine, Nelson Goodman) 3 Particularly relevant to the discussion here are Paul Ricoeur's Interpretation Theory (Texan Christian University Press, Fort Worth, 1976) and The Rule of Metaphor (University of Chicago Press, 1978), and Hans-Georg Gadamer's Truth and Method (Seabury Press, New York, 1975) and Philosophical Hermeneutics (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1976). 4 Cf. section 20 of Schleiermacher's The Hermeneutics: Outline of the 1819 lecturers, (New Literary History, Winter, 1979, pp. 1-16). 5 Karl Mueller-Vollmer's The Hermeneutic Reader (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1985) provides a helpful overview of this as well as an anthology of writings by the key figures of romanticist and modern hermeneutics. 6 On closer inspection Dilthey's ( The Development of Hermeneutics, Selected Works, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, 1901/1988) influential depiction of Schleiermacher's model - as basically a theory of psychological empathy - is a mere simplification that does not do it justice. In distinguishing between psychological and grammatical modes of interpretation (which he saw as interdependent), Schleiermacher's model describes how the psychological mode is transformed in terms of the figural dimensions of language-use (i.e. the grammatical mode) - thus resembling, in some ways, the dialogical reconstruction of the hermeneutic circle by Gadamer and Ricoeur. As Gadamer has pointed out, Schleiermacher's definition of hermeneutics as the art of avoiding misunderstanding (and not the achievement of literal intersubjective understanding) provides a useful basis for developing a dialogical model of the hermeneutic circle. 7 Being and Time (Harpur & Row, 1962). See, for example, Section For a useful introduction to this later development see David Hoy's The Critical Circle (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1978).
3 the conclusion that this could not, ultimately, be theorised. The reason for this, it may be suggested, is that he, like the romantics, represented the hermeneutic circle as a subjectobject relation - thus implicitly reinforcing the framework of an objectivist-relativist dichotomy. Within a dialogical framework, the hermeneutic circle may be reconstructed as fundamentally a representation-interpretation relation of communication or exchange. As Gadamer (1976:15) put it, understanding does not take place in a vacuum but is language-bound (i.e. is mediated) 9. Thus, as Ricoeur (1976:86) further suggested, the whole problematic of interpretation... [is] less an intersubjective relation of mutual understanding than a relation of apprehension applied to the world conveyed by the work 10. In this way the dialogical model of the hermeneutic circle is able to provide a theoretical basis for arguing that acts of interpretation or communication do not take place in a vacuum, are not just functions of the content and/or forms of representation. In other words, the mediation of knowledge is not just a process of translation or a mere 'mirroring' of subject-object relations, but one of implicit transformation. In Truth and Method (1975), Gadamer argued that any act of representation or interpretation (and thus critical reasoning) does not just reproduce or reflect meaning - it also produces it. He thus refers to the excess of meaning in language-use which has semantic and rhetorical autonomy from either a subjective or objective reference for it. Like Ricoeur, Gadamer also refers to how the meaning of any statement or a text lies in front of it, not inside it. His dialogical methodology, which therefore recognises that the rhetorical and hermeneutical aspects of human linguisticality completely interpenetrate each other (1976:25), proceeds on the productively circular basis of not only identifying and answering the question which any assertion of facts or text seeks to answer, but of further dialogical questioning which confronts the otherness, difference, or newness of a discourse, text, or cultural context. The dialogical model of the hermeneutic circle describes how any act of interpretation transforms that which is represented, authorised or produced (e.g. as either objective or subjective meaning) in relation to specific contexts. Thus, for instance, like a number of philosophers of science who have also turned to this model (e.g. Rom Harre, Mary Hesse, Thomas Kuhn), many western ethnographers (e.g. Clifford Geertz, James Clifford, Renato Rosaldo) have increasingly realised that what unavoidably gets interpreted or communicated in the study of traditional social contexts and actual texts is as much their own implicit western/modern/rationalist preconceptions and prejudices as any explicit representations Gadamer's concept of language goes beyond the narrow concepts of idiomatic content or a formal system to describe the historicality (or cultural and rhetorical context) of human communication in terms of the infinite dialogue which ever opens up and transforms the finitude of human life. As he puts it in his essay Scope and function of reflection (1976:32): Language, then, is not the finally found anonymous subject of all social-historical processes and action, which presents the whole of its activities as objectivisations to our observing gaze; rather, it is by itself the game of interpretation that we all are engaged in every day. 10 This may be considered in terms of viewing the hermeneutic circle as the dialogic relation of parts and wholes. The objectivism-relativism opposition may be identified in terms of the alternate errors of confusing the map [part] with the territory [whole] and throwing out the baby [part] with the bathwater [whole]. Whereas both these perspectives focus upon the explicit representation relation between parts and wholes, a dialogical framework focuses on interpreting parts also in relation to the implicit aspects of the wholes which they represent (i.e. actual or historical contexts of interpretation as well as the representation of mere contents or forms). 11 Relevant here is the sociologist Anthony Giddens' use of the term double hermeneutic (after Gadamer) to refer to the dialogical conception that people in social worlds are able to, in terms of the ordinary language of lay actors, to talk back to social scientists or, rather, the technical terminologies they invent and use (i.e. a positivist framework, whether it involves an objectivist or relativist methodology).
4 4 The basis for a dialogical reconstruction of the hermeneutic circle The basis for a dialogical reconstruction of the hermeneutic circle is a recognition that interpretation, knowledge and communication are acts or process of transformational and not just translational mediation. Three key points might be identified. First, a dialogical framework represents a dialectical methodology that is implicitly grounded in human dialogue. Second, such a framework reconstructs the act or process of critical reasoning as a provisional phase and mode of interpretation open to contextual transformation. Third, as the exemplary dialogical medium of human interpretation, knowledge and communication, language-use provides the key locus for a dialogical reconstruction of the hermeneutic circle. It will suffice to mention here that a dialogical methodology may be considered to involve a dialectical epistemology which is grounded in the rhetoric of ordinary human language-use and cultural contexts. In contrast to other conceptions of dialectic 12, the dialogical model recognises that an implicitly symmetrical notion of dialogue inevitably appropriates explicitly asymmetrical forms of human interaction or discourse in terms of being open to rhetorical reversals of Self-Other or subject-object relations. In other words, however monological or asymmetrical a discourse or situation may seem to be (e.g. as described by Hegel's conception of the master-slave relation in human history) it is implicitly dialogical to some degree, and thus potentially open to transformation. For what is dialectical is the process of mediation itself (i.e. the open-ended hermeneutic circle of representation and interpretation) and not Self-Other or subject-object relations in themselves. A crucial implication of the focus on how knowledge is transformed in its mediation is that any methodology is a provisonal hereustic strategy. In other words, any method of critical reasoning is a tool, and if taken too literally or permanently then becomes false. So instead of being a question of truth or falsity per se (e.g. of a model or a statement), it becomes rather a question of interpreting and distinguishing usage and abusage. As debates in the philosophy of science have inevitably recognised, theory and models are heuristic devices which transform the theory-dependence of observation in an open-ended circular relation. In contrast to relativist interpretations of reality (e.g. Popper's falsificationism), a dialogical methodology not only emphasises the provisional efficacy of any method, model or theory, but suggests that critical reasoning is a strategic and provisional phase of the larger process of interpretation. Thus, a dialogical framework distinguishes between naive, critical and dialogical modes of interpretation. These modes correspond to the distinction between objectivist, relativist and dialogical frameworks. It is this the qualifying clause of provisionality which opens up the hermeneutic circle in a dialogical sense. The clause of provisionality also provides a basis for two important distinctions Ricoeur makes in building upon Gadamer's challenge to Heidegger to construct a more developed dialogical model of how an interpreter's own historicality is the precondition of an open-ended, productive hermeneutic circle 13. Gadamer distingushed between a 12 Modern re-conceptions of a dialogical methodology can thus be contrasted with Aristotle's conception of dialectic as syllogistic reasoning and post-enlightenment conceptions of a dialectical methodology (e.g. Hegel's idealist and Marx's materialist conceptions of dialectic as a function of self-reflective reason in human history). In other words, a dialogical methodology involves a discipline of dialectics framed by that of rhetoric (in the dialogical sense) - rather than vice-versa, as has generally been the orthodoxy since Socrates. This model thus also appropriates the classical definition of rhetoric, (i.e. as the privileged art and/or methodical discipline of using language for persuasive purposes) - grounding it in conventional contexts and practices of interactive communication 13 In The Universality of the Hermeneutical Problem Gadamer (1976) argues that a hermeneutical dimension even encompasses the entire procedure of science... the methodological self-consciousness of modern science. In On the Scope and Function of Hemeneutical Representation he distinguishes this
5 critical mode of distanciation grounded in historicality on one hand, and an arbitrary, permanent methodological alienation of reason in a vacuum on the other. Similarly, Ricoeur describes the interpretative dialectic of critical distanciation and dialogical appropriation to interpret meaning as a context-dependent transformation, and not as something uniquely self-contained and unchanging. The different phases of interpretation might be considered in term of how the function of mediation is transformed in conventional language-use. For it is in languageuse one might best consider the terms of how a dialogical framework appropriates the self-reinforcing opposition of objectivism and relativism. In responding to the problem of explicit circularity or infinite regression in knowledge, communication and interpretation, the dialogical strategy might be distinguished from the kinds of relativist manoeuvres represented by exponents, say, of ordinary language philosophy (Wittgenstein, Austin, Strawson) or pragmatics (Grice, Lyons, Halliday) - people who have challenged the objectivist illusion that an artificial or transcendental language of pure abstraction might be constructed to literally mirror reality. In the context of how modern hermeneutics has been divided over the issue of language as a medium of communication (for Gadamer, a dialogical medium of historicity and, for Habermas, a reflective medium of universal pragmatics ), it is pertinent to consider how linguistic relativists have responded to the idea that the Enlightenment conception of reflective reason is an infinite regression, a vicious circle. The relativists argued that by discarding the referential criterion of formalist ontology (and semantics) and replacing it with notions of historicist or pragmatic relevance they were able to avoid the formalist threat of infinite regression. However, from a dialogical perspective relativist frameworks of knowledge reinforce a similar privileged perspective of language-use in opposition to populist modes as that promoted by the objectivism, say, of formalist semantics; also, a similar positivist assumption that metaphorical and/or poetic aspects of language-use are special cases rather than constitutive functions of language-use 14. In contrast to objectivist or relativist frameworks of interpretation, the dialogical model recognises that figural forms of representation are fundamental aspects of language-use which facilitate interactive communication - and thus interpretation and knowledge. In short, it recognises how language-use presupposes the use of rhetorical strategies and, thus, how metaphorical functions of representation are related to those of interpretation. Ricoeur's concept of metaphorical reference Metaphorical reference is one of the crucial concepts involved in Ricoeur's reconstruction of the hermeneutic circle in terms of the transformative function of mediation. It is defined and developed in The Rule of Metaphor (1978). According to Ricoeur, the suspension of reference in the sense defined by the norms of descriptive discourse is the negative condition of the appearance of a more fundamental mode of reference, (whose) explication is the task of interpretation (p.229). This more fundamental mode (i.e. metaphorical reference) is a concept which suggests that no kind of subjective or objective reference ever operates in a vacuum (as a binary opposition). Human reflection on either subjective experience or objective reality is ever framed, implicitly if not explicitly, by an interactive imagination. Such a term thus serves to recognise that all human interaction, representation, and communication is implicitly an open-ended, dialectical and transformative process grounded in context-dependent mediations of language-use. In short, the concept of metaphorical reference describes the 5 critical mode of distanciation (in practice, embraced and transformed by the hermeneutical dimension) from an arbitrary or permanent methodological alienation which ignores a knower's historicality. 14 It may be argued that the relativists have not overcome the problem of circular reasoning but implicitly reinforced it in such terms as historical or contextual determinism.
6 im-mediate relation of self and world mediated in language-use in such terms as the semantic autonomy or reception of a discourse or text. There are two ways this might be discussed, since Ricoeur developed his theory in dialogue with both ordinary language philosophy and post-structuralist applications of the semiotic model 15. First, it re-inverts Strawson's linguistic application of Frege's distinction between sense and reference. Whereas for Strawson reference defines the sense of (the immanent meaning or content) of any statement, for Ricoeur the sense that is applied in language-use defines the reference - the split reference of self and world. Second, Ricoeur re-inverts (in the sense of appropriating) Derrida's strategic inversion of the relation between writing and reading. He recognises that a written text (rather than discourse per se) is an exemplary form of communication since it is mediated dialogue which recapitulates the im-mediate conditions of dialogue. In other words, discursive language-use implicitly presupposes actual contexts on one hand, and rhetorical strategies on the other, which together serve to mediate symbolic action, social convention and cultural contexts (and/or imaginary worlds). Challenging the basic assumptions of both these traditions of language theory, Ricoeur thus has provided powerful support for an argument that metaphors are a constitutive basis, and not merely paranthetic aspect, of all language-use - therefore, also of interpretation, knowledge and communication.. In describing the metaphoric functions of referentiality, communicability and selfunderstanding (as progressively interdependent, fundamental dimensions of mediation), Ricoeur suggests that their interdependent relation provide a basis for recognising that the hermeneutical problem begins, then, where linguistics leaves off. Referentiality describes the relation of Self and the world. Ricoeur's (1978) own theory of metaphorical reference conceives this as an intrinsically interactive, transformational relation and mediation, rather than a subject-object one in which language merely mirrors and describes the objective world (and/or defines human subjectivity) in processes of identification, communication and knowledge. Within this dialogical perspective, the communicability dimension of mediation between different selves is not just utilitarian, but based on the reversibility (in an interactive and rhetorical sense) of the Self/Other relation. In relation to this (as well as the dimension of referentiality), the dimension of self-understanding pertains to the self-awareness of personal or public prejudices, preconceptions and, above all, motives - embracing both desires and values - in either the representation or interpretation of meaning. Hence, the dimension of self-understanding may be regarded as the key to the dialogical reconstruction of the hermeneutic circle. Gadamer's concept of self-understanding Gadamer's concept of self-understanding might be considered in the context of two other key concepts he developed. One is the concept of prejudice, in the sense of implicit preconceptions which mediate processes of knowledge communication and intepretation - or hidden premises or agendas which might inform the process of critical reasoning. In his essay The Universality of the Hermeneutical Problem, Gadamer (1976:9) suggests that it is not so much our judgments as it is our prejudices that constitute our being. A second related concept is that of historicality. Put as simply as possible, Gadamer's concept of historicality refers to how any act or process of interpretation is informed by the inter-relation between an open-ended horizon of the present in constant 6 15 Yet, from contradictory positions, both objectivists and relativists retained a common assumption of the arbitrary distinction between literal and metaphorical meanings, between descriptive ( in the sense of giving information about facts ) and emotional uses of language. It is this latent positivism which, as Ricoeur has recognised, provides the epistemological connection between formal and contextual theories of linguistic (and literary) meaning both in semiotic and analytical traditions.
7 formation on one hand, and that of specific, localised cultural contexts (or languages ) of human life on the other. In other words, the hermeneutic circles of both human subjectivity and language-use are ever framed by that of the historicality of any act of interpretation: human meaning is constantly concretised as an interplay of the past and present. Thus, for Gadamer, the concept of historicality provides a basis for distinguishing between arbitrary and legitimate prejudices or interpretative preconceptions Gadamer does not deny the prejudices of one's own present horizons (and thus reinforcing implicit bias), but recognises this is able to be overcome in practice by being aware of it in terms of one's historical condition or finitude on one hand (i.e. that selfidentity is not neither merely an objective or subjective condition), and the dialogical process of mediated and not just immediate communication on the other. Objectivist and relativist frameworks would isolate the act of interpretation from the process of history (from individual/collective actions and events, social contexts and the rhetorical function of myth-making ), would isolate an abstract concept of the present in relation to the past (and future). Therefore, in his essay On the Problem of Self-Understanding (1976), Gadamer asserts that understanding is not a mere (reflective) reproduction of knowledge but by virtue of how understanding is aware of the fact that it is indeed an act of repeating transforms that knowledge and, in doing so, thus produces meaning. As he writes in the same essay: The genuine reality of the hermeneutical process seems to me to encompass the selfunderstanding of the interpreter as well as what is interpreted... The real event of understanding goes beyond what we can bring to the understanding of the other person's words through methodical effort and critical self-control. Indeed, it goes beyond what we ourselves can become aware of... It is not really ourselves who understand: it is always a past that allows us to say, I have understood (Gadamer, 1976:58). Within in a dialogical framework, the self-understanding dimension of mediation may be regarded as grounded in the physical, social and rhetorical/cultural realities of human action (i.e. also in terms of the corresponding rhetorical predicates of desire, power and knowledge) - and not a transcendental or privileged perspective of either objectivity or subjectivity. This may also be discussed in terms of how naive, critical, and dialogical modes of interpretation correspond, in the context of mediation as a transformational process, to the representational modes of content, form, and substance (this last term understood here as the semantic/rhetorical autonomy of discourses, texts and traditions). In other words, it is possible to distinguish between self-understanding and manipulative persuasion (or bad faith ) in terms of how a dialectic of naive identification and critical negativity ever informs rhetorical strategies of communication and knowledge, as well as practices of either representation and interpretation. The habits or patterns of perception, thought and action which some people view or experience as fixed or inevitable vicious circles are able to be recognised by others as potentially productive and open to change. The human capacity for shared selfunderstanding is thus an intrinsic transformative function of the hermeneutic circle - one which makes this concept a useful meta-methodology of interpretation, knowledge and communication. Conclusion The relevance of Gadamer and Ricoeur's efforts to reconstruct the hermeneutic circle, I would suggest, lies in providing a dialogical or interactive framework of knowledge, of communication, of interpretation, of critical reasoning that overcomes the objectivist and relativist methodological opposition, a subject-object conception of knowledge. Such a framework challenges the enduring, usually implicit assumption in western philosophical traditions that critical reasoning takes place in a vacuum, that reason can be separated from its other. I have briefly described how the concept of 7
8 dialogical might be approached as a dialectical methodology grounded in rhetoric rather than logic or metaphysics - that is, rhetoric as a strategy and context of communication, and not just of persuasion. The similar dialogical frameworks of both Gadamer and Ricoeur can be considered to have recovered the spirit as well as method of Socrates' conception of the philosopher as a mid-wife facilitating self-knowledge. So, in conclusion, I would like to suggest that the philosophical frameworks of Ricoeur and Gadamer have interdisciplinary relevance for addressing the various philosophical problems and methodological issues which continue to be assumed in on-going debates in different intellectual traditions
Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method, 2d ed. transl. by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall (London : Sheed & Ward, 1989), pp [1960].
Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method, 2d ed. transl. by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall (London : Sheed & Ward, 1989), pp. 266-307 [1960]. 266 : [W]e can inquire into the consequences for the hermeneutics
More informationA Comprehensive Critical Study of Gadamer s Hermeneutics
REVIEW A Comprehensive Critical Study of Gadamer s Hermeneutics Kristin Gjesdal: Gadamer and the Legacy of German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. xvii + 235 pp. ISBN 978-0-521-50964-0
More informationHERMENEUTIC PHILOSOPHY AND DATA COLLECTION: A PRACTICAL FRAMEWORK
Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) AMCIS 2002 Proceedings Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) December 2002 HERMENEUTIC PHILOSOPHY AND DATA COLLECTION: A
More informationThese are some notes to give you some idea of the content of the lecture they are not exhaustive, nor always accurate! So read the referenced work.
Research Methods II: Lecture notes These are some notes to give you some idea of the content of the lecture they are not exhaustive, nor always accurate! So read the referenced work. Consider the approaches
More informationKęstas Kirtiklis Vilnius University Not by Communication Alone: The Importance of Epistemology in the Field of Communication Theory.
Kęstas Kirtiklis Vilnius University Not by Communication Alone: The Importance of Epistemology in the Field of Communication Theory Paper in progress It is often asserted that communication sciences experience
More informationCHAPTER 2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
CHAPTER 2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 2.1 Poetry Poetry is an adapted word from Greek which its literal meaning is making. The art made up of poems, texts with charged, compressed language (Drury, 2006, p. 216).
More informationSociety for the Study of Symbolic Interaction SSSI/ASA 2002 Conference, Chicago
Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction SSSI/ASA 2002 Conference, Chicago From Symbolic Interactionism to Luhmann: From First-order to Second-order Observations of Society Submitted by David J. Connell
More informationHeideggerian Ontology: A Philosophic Base for Arts and Humanties Education
Marilyn Zurmuehlen Working Papers in Art Education ISSN: 2326-7070 (Print) ISSN: 2326-7062 (Online) Volume 2 Issue 1 (1983) pps. 56-60 Heideggerian Ontology: A Philosophic Base for Arts and Humanties Education
More informationNotes on Gadamer, The Relevance of the Beautiful
Notes on Gadamer, The Relevance of the Beautiful The Unity of Art 3ff G. sets out to argue for the historical continuity of (the justification for) art. 5 Hegel new legitimation based on the anthropological
More informationFour Characteristic Research Paradigms
Part II... Four Characteristic Research Paradigms INTRODUCTION Earlier I identified two contrasting beliefs in methodology: one as a mechanism for securing validity, and the other as a relationship between
More informationIn inquiry into what constitutes interpretation in natural science. will have to reflect on the constitutive elements of interpretation and three
CHAPTER VIII UNDERSTANDING HERMENEUTICS IN NATURAL SCIENCE In inquiry into what constitutes interpretation in natural science will have to reflect on the constitutive elements of interpretation and three
More informationBy Rahel Jaeggi Suhrkamp, 2014, pbk 20, ISBN , 451pp. by Hans Arentshorst
271 Kritik von Lebensformen By Rahel Jaeggi Suhrkamp, 2014, pbk 20, ISBN 9783518295878, 451pp by Hans Arentshorst Does contemporary philosophy need to concern itself with the question of the good life?
More informationKANT S TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC
KANT S TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC This part of the book deals with the conditions under which judgments can express truths about objects. Here Kant tries to explain how thought about objects given in space and
More informationOn The Search for a Perfect Language
On The Search for a Perfect Language Submitted to: Peter Trnka By: Alex Macdonald The correspondence theory of truth has attracted severe criticism. One focus of attack is the notion of correspondence
More informationPH 360 CROSS-CULTURAL PHILOSOPHY IES Abroad Vienna
PH 360 CROSS-CULTURAL PHILOSOPHY IES Abroad Vienna DESCRIPTION: The basic presupposition behind the course is that philosophy is an activity we are unable to resist : since we reflect on other people,
More informationThe Historicity of Understanding and the Problem of Relativism in Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics
Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series I, Culture and Values, Volume 27 Series IIA, Islam, Volume 11 The Historicity of Understanding and the Problem of Relativism in Gadamer's Philosophical
More informationMODULE 4. Is Philosophy Research? Music Education Philosophy Journals and Symposia
Modes of Inquiry II: Philosophical Research and the Philosophy of Research So What is Art? Kimberly C. Walls October 30, 2007 MODULE 4 Is Philosophy Research? Phelps, et al Rainbow & Froelich Heller &
More informationThe phenomenological tradition conceptualizes
15-Craig-45179.qxd 3/9/2007 3:39 PM Page 217 UNIT V INTRODUCTION THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL TRADITION The phenomenological tradition conceptualizes communication as dialogue or the experience of otherness. Although
More informationVinod Lakshmipathy Phil 591- Hermeneutics Prof. Theodore Kisiel
Vinod Lakshmipathy Phil 591- Hermeneutics Prof. Theodore Kisiel 09-25-03 Jean Grodin Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics (New Haven and London: Yale university Press, 1994) Outline on Chapter V
More informationThis is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail.
This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Author(s): Arentshorst, Hans Title: Book Review : Freedom s Right.
More informationTheory or Theories? Based on: R.T. Craig (1999), Communication Theory as a field, Communication Theory, n. 2, May,
Theory or Theories? Based on: R.T. Craig (1999), Communication Theory as a field, Communication Theory, n. 2, May, 119-161. 1 To begin. n Is it possible to identify a Theory of communication field? n There
More informationNATIONAL SEMINAR ON EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: ISSUES AND CONCERNS 1 ST AND 2 ND MARCH, 2013
NATIONAL SEMINAR ON EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: ISSUES AND CONCERNS 1 ST AND 2 ND MARCH, 2013 HERMENEUTIC ANALYSIS - A QUALITATIVE APPROACH FOR RESEARCH IN EDUCATION - B.VALLI Man, is of his very nature an interpretive
More informationA Process of the Fusion of Horizons in the Text Interpretation
A Process of the Fusion of Horizons in the Text Interpretation Kazuya SASAKI Rikkyo University There is a philosophy, which takes a circle between the whole and the partial meaning as the necessary condition
More informationTROUBLING QUALITATIVE INQUIRY: ACCOUNTS AS DATA, AND AS PRODUCTS
TROUBLING QUALITATIVE INQUIRY: ACCOUNTS AS DATA, AND AS PRODUCTS Martyn Hammersley The Open University, UK Webinar, International Institute for Qualitative Methodology, University of Alberta, March 2014
More informationTruth and Method in Unification Thought: A Preparatory Analysis
Truth and Method in Unification Thought: A Preparatory Analysis Keisuke Noda Ph.D. Associate Professor of Philosophy Unification Theological Seminary New York, USA Abstract This essay gives a preparatory
More informationTheory or Theories? Based on: R.T. Craig (1999), Communication Theory as a field, Communication Theory, n. 2, May,
Theory or Theories? Based on: R.T. Craig (1999), Communication Theory as a field, Communication Theory, n. 2, May, 119-161. 1 To begin. n Is it possible to identify a Theory of communication field? n There
More informationEdward Winters. Aesthetics and Architecture. London: Continuum, 2007, 179 pp. ISBN
zlom 7.5.2009 8:12 Stránka 111 Edward Winters. Aesthetics and Architecture. London: Continuum, 2007, 179 pp. ISBN 0826486320 Aesthetics and Architecture, by Edward Winters, a British aesthetician, painter,
More informationPart IV Social Science and Network Theory
Part IV Social Science and Network Theory 184 Social Science and Network Theory In previous chapters we have outlined the network theory of knowledge, and in particular its application to natural science.
More informationWhat counts as a convincing scientific argument? Are the standards for such evaluation
Cogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and Habermas. By William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009. Pp. 355. Cloth, $40. Paper, $20. Jeffrey Flynn Fordham University Published
More informationOn Interpretation and Translation
Appendix Six On Interpretation and Translation The purpose of this appendix is to briefly discuss the hermeneutical assumptions that inform the approach to the Analects adopted in this translation the
More information10/24/2016 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Lecture 4: Research Paradigms Paradigm is E- mail Mobile
Web: www.kailashkut.com RESEARCH METHODOLOGY E- mail srtiwari@ioe.edu.np Mobile 9851065633 Lecture 4: Research Paradigms Paradigm is What is Paradigm? Definition, Concept, the Paradigm Shift? Main Components
More informationKant s Critique of Judgment
PHI 600/REL 600: Kant s Critique of Judgment Dr. Ahmed Abdel Meguid Office Hours: Fr: 11:00-1:00 pm 512 Hall of Languagues E-mail: aelsayed@syr.edu Spring 2017 Description: Kant s Critique of Judgment
More informationPost-positivism. Nick J Fox
Post-positivism Nick J Fox n.j.fox@sheffield.ac.uk To cite: Fox, N.J. (2008) Post-positivism. In: Given, L.M. (ed.) The SAGE Encyclopaedia of Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage. Post-positivism
More informationBeyond Objectivism and Relativism by Richard J. ~ Bernstein, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, ~ 1983.
Beyond Objectivism and Relativism by Richard J. ~ Bernstein, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, ~ 1983. Reviewed by John K. Smith University of Northern Iowa In his latest book Mr. Richard
More informationParadigm paradoxes and the processes of educational research: Using the theory of logical types to aid clarity.
Paradigm paradoxes and the processes of educational research: Using the theory of logical types to aid clarity. John Gardiner & Stephen Thorpe (edith cowan university) Abstract This paper examines possible
More informationMass Communication Theory
Mass Communication Theory 2015 spring sem Prof. Jaewon Joo 7 traditions of the communication theory Key Seven Traditions in the Field of Communication Theory 1. THE SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL TRADITION: Communication
More informationNature's Perspectives
Nature's Perspectives Prospects for Ordinal Metaphysics Edited by Armen Marsoobian Kathleen Wallace Robert S. Corrington STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK PRESS Irl N z \'4 I F r- : an414 FA;ZW Introduction
More informationHEGEL, ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY AND THE RETURN OF METAPHYISCS Simon Lumsden
PARRHESIA NUMBER 11 2011 89-93 HEGEL, ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY AND THE RETURN OF METAPHYISCS Simon Lumsden At issue in Paul Redding s 2007 work, Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought, and in
More informationMethodology in a Pluralist Environment. Sheila C Dow. Published in Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(1): 33-40, Abstract
Methodology in a Pluralist Environment Sheila C Dow Published in Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(1): 33-40, 2001. Abstract The future role for methodology will be conditioned both by the way in which
More informationCurrent Issues in Pictorial Semiotics
Current Issues in Pictorial Semiotics Course Description What is the systematic nature and the historical origin of pictorial semiotics? How do pictures differ from and resemble verbal signs? What reasons
More informationWeek 25 Deconstruction
Theoretical & Critical Perspectives Week 25 Key Questions What is deconstruction? Where does it come from? How does deconstruction conceptualise language? How does deconstruction see literature and history?
More informationCommunicability and Empathy: Sensus Communis and the Idea of the Sublime in Dialogical Aesthetics
Communicability and Empathy: Sensus Communis and the Idea of the Sublime in Dialogical Aesthetics Cristian Nae George Enescu University of the Arts, Iasi, Romania Abstract. In this paper, I intend to sketch
More informationConceptual Change, Relativism, and Rationality
Conceptual Change, Relativism, and Rationality University of Chicago Department of Philosophy PHIL 23709 Fall Quarter, 2011 Syllabus Instructor: Silver Bronzo Email: bronzo@uchicago Class meets: T/TH 4:30-5:50,
More informationBy Maximus Monaheng Sefotho (PhD). 16 th June, 2015
The nature of inquiry! A researcher s dilemma: Philosophy in crafting dissertations and theses. By Maximus Monaheng Sefotho (PhD). 16 th June, 2015 Maximus.sefotho@up.ac.za max.sefotho@gmail.com Sefotho,
More informationInterdepartmental Learning Outcomes
University Major/Dept Learning Outcome Source Linguistics The undergraduate degree in linguistics emphasizes knowledge and awareness of: the fundamental architecture of language in the domains of phonetics
More informationNecessity in Kant; Subjective and Objective
Necessity in Kant; Subjective and Objective DAVID T. LARSON University of Kansas Kant suggests that his contribution to philosophy is analogous to the contribution of Copernicus to astronomy each involves
More informationScientific Method and Research Ethics. Interpretation. Anna Petronella Foultier
Scientific Method and Research Ethics Interpretation Anna Petronella Foultier Meaning and interpretation: Is there a form of interpretation that corresponds to every form of meaning? Natural meaning Perceptual
More informationPoznań, July Magdalena Zabielska
Introduction It is a truism, yet universally acknowledged, that medicine has played a fundamental role in people s lives. Medicine concerns their health which conditions their functioning in society. It
More informationDiscourse analysis is an umbrella term for a range of methodological approaches that
Wiggins, S. (2009). Discourse analysis. In Harry T. Reis & Susan Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Human Relationships. Pp. 427-430. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Discourse analysis Discourse analysis is an
More informationGlossary. Melanie Kill
210 Glossary Melanie Kill Activity system A system of mediated, interactive, shared, motivated, and sometimes competing activities. Within an activity system, the subjects or agents, the objectives, and
More informationRicoeur s Theory of Interpretation: A Method for Understanding Text (Course Text)
World Applied Sciences Journal 15 (11): 1623-1629, 2011 ISSN 1818-4952 IDOSI Publications, 2011 Ricoeur s Theory of Interpretation: A Method for Understanding Text (Course Text) 1 2 2 1 A. Ghasemi, M.
More informationCRITICAL CONTEXTUAL EMPIRICISM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS
48 Proceedings of episteme 4, India CRITICAL CONTEXTUAL EMPIRICISM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION Sreejith K.K. Department of Philosophy, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India sreejith997@gmail.com
More informationFrench theories in IS research : An exploratory study on ICIS, AMCIS and MISQ
Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) AMCIS 2004 Proceedings Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) December 2004 French theories in IS research : An exploratory
More informationMind Association. Oxford University Press and Mind Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Mind.
Mind Association Proper Names Author(s): John R. Searle Source: Mind, New Series, Vol. 67, No. 266 (Apr., 1958), pp. 166-173 Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of the Mind Association Stable
More information138 Great Problems in Philosophy and Physics - Solved? Chapter 11. Meaning. This chapter on the web informationphilosopher.com/knowledge/meaning
138 Great Problems in Philosophy and Physics - Solved? This chapter on the web informationphilosopher.com/knowledge/meaning The Problem of The meaning of any word, concept, or object is different for different
More informationEditor s Introduction
Andreea Deciu Ritivoi Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, Volume 6, Number 2, Winter 2014, pp. vii-x (Article) Published by University of Nebraska Press For additional information about this article
More information1/8. The Third Paralogism and the Transcendental Unity of Apperception
1/8 The Third Paralogism and the Transcendental Unity of Apperception This week we are focusing only on the 3 rd of Kant s Paralogisms. Despite the fact that this Paralogism is probably the shortest of
More informationBrandom s Reconstructive Rationality. Some Pragmatist Themes
Brandom s Reconstructive Rationality. Some Pragmatist Themes Testa, Italo email: italo.testa@unipr.it webpage: http://venus.unive.it/cortella/crtheory/bios/bio_it.html University of Parma, Dipartimento
More informationSpatial Formations. Installation Art between Image and Stage.
Spatial Formations. Installation Art between Image and Stage. An English Summary Anne Ring Petersen Although much has been written about the origins and diversity of installation art as well as its individual
More informationCUST 100 Week 17: 26 January Stuart Hall: Encoding/Decoding Reading: Stuart Hall, Encoding/Decoding (Coursepack)
CUST 100 Week 17: 26 January Stuart Hall: Encoding/Decoding Reading: Stuart Hall, Encoding/Decoding (Coursepack) N.B. If you want a semiotics refresher in relation to Encoding-Decoding, please check the
More informationRevitalising Old Thoughts: Class diagrams in light of the early Wittgenstein
In J. Kuljis, L. Baldwin & R. Scoble (Eds). Proc. PPIG 14 Pages 196-203 Revitalising Old Thoughts: Class diagrams in light of the early Wittgenstein Christian Holmboe Department of Teacher Education and
More informationCHAPTER III CRITICAL THEORY AND HERMENEUTICS
CHAPTER III CRITICAL THEORY AND HERMENEUTICS The last three decades have been significant for philosophy, science and politics in different ways. The different debates spread over this period, involving
More informationSwindal, James. Action and Existence: The Case for Agent Causation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Swindal, James. Action and Existence: The Case for Agent Causation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. In Action and Existence: The Case for Agent Causation, James Swindal develops and defends a detailed,
More informationBetween Hermeneutics and Deconstruction A Critical Approach of the Question of Understanding
UNIVERSITATEA BABE!-BOLYAI CLUJ-NAPOCA!COALA DOCTORAL" CULTUR"!I COMUNICARE Between Hermeneutics and Deconstruction A Critical Approach of the Question of Understanding PhD THESIS - SUMMARY - Coordonator!tiin"ific
More informationTERMS & CONCEPTS. The Critical Analytic Vocabulary of the English Language A GLOSSARY OF CRITICAL THINKING
Language shapes the way we think, and determines what we can think about. BENJAMIN LEE WHORF, American Linguist A GLOSSARY OF CRITICAL THINKING TERMS & CONCEPTS The Critical Analytic Vocabulary of the
More informationHans-Georg Gadamer s Philosophical Hermeneutics and Intercultural Communication. Synopsis
Hans-Georg Gadamer s Philosophical Hermeneutics and Intercultural Communication Synopsis The German philosopher, Hans-Georg Gadamer, is perhaps the foremost representative of the hermeneutic tradition.
More informationMetaphors we live by. Structural metaphors. Orientational metaphors. A personal summary
Metaphors we live by George Lakoff, Mark Johnson 1980. London, University of Chicago Press A personal summary This highly influential book was written after the two authors met, in 1979, with a joint interest
More informationPlato s work in the philosophy of mathematics contains a variety of influential claims and arguments.
Philosophy 405: Knowledge, Truth and Mathematics Spring 2014 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #3 - Plato s Platonism Sample Introductory Material from Marcus and McEvoy, An Historical Introduction
More informationPhilosophical Background to 19 th Century Modernism
Philosophical Background to 19 th Century Modernism Early Modern Philosophy In the sixteenth century, European artists and philosophers, influenced by the rise of empirical science, faced a formidable
More information[My method is] a science that studies the life of signs within society I shall call it semiology from the Greek semeion signs (Saussure)
Week 12: 24 November Ferdinand de Saussure: Early Structuralism and Linguistics Reading: John Storey, Chapter 6: Structuralism and post-structuralism (first half of article only, pp. 87-98) John Hartley,
More informationIntersubjectivity and Language
1 Intersubjectivity and Language Peter Olen University of Central Florida The presentation and subsequent publication of Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge in Paris in February 1929 mark
More informationPhenomenology Glossary
Phenomenology Glossary Phenomenology: Phenomenology is the science of phenomena: of the way things show up, appear, or are given to a subject in their conscious experience. Phenomenology tries to describe
More informationAn Intense Defence of Gadamer s Significance for Aesthetics
REVIEW An Intense Defence of Gadamer s Significance for Aesthetics Nicholas Davey: Unfinished Worlds: Hermeneutics, Aesthetics and Gadamer. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013. 190 pp. ISBN 978-0-7486-8622-3
More informationPAUL REDDING S CONTINENTAL IDEALISM (AND DELEUZE S CONTINUATION OF THE IDEALIST TRADITION) Sean Bowden
PARRHESIA NUMBER 11 2011 75-79 PAUL REDDING S CONTINENTAL IDEALISM (AND DELEUZE S CONTINUATION OF THE IDEALIST TRADITION) Sean Bowden I came to Paul Redding s 2009 work, Continental Idealism: Leibniz to
More informationCHAPTER TWO EPISTEMOLOGY AND THEORY. Introduction. the dissertation, which are postmodern, social constructionist and ecosystemic in nature.
CHAPTER TWO EPISTEMOLOGY AND THEORY Introduction In this chapter I outline the basic epistemological and theoretical underpinnings of the dissertation, which are postmodern, social constructionist and
More informationThe hermeneutical rule that we must understand the whole,from the individual and the individual from the whole stems
1 On the Circle of Understanding The hermeneutical rule that we must understand the whole,from the individual and the individual from the whole stems I from ancient rhetoric and was carried over by modern
More informationAre There Two Theories of Goodness in the Republic? A Response to Santas. Rachel Singpurwalla
Are There Two Theories of Goodness in the Republic? A Response to Santas Rachel Singpurwalla It is well known that Plato sketches, through his similes of the sun, line and cave, an account of the good
More informationPhilosophy in the educational process: Understanding what cannot be taught
META: RESEARCH IN HERMENEUTICS, PHENOMENOLOGY, AND PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY VOL. IV, NO. 2 / DECEMBER 2012: 417-421, ISSN 2067-3655, www.metajournal.org Philosophy in the educational process: Understanding
More information(as methodology) are not always distinguished by Steward: he says,
SOME MISCONCEPTIONS OF MULTILINEAR EVOLUTION1 William C. Smith It is the object of this paper to consider certain conceptual difficulties in Julian Steward's theory of multillnear evolution. The particular
More informationElena Tatievskaya The Notion of Tradition in Gadamer s Hermeneutic Ontology
Elena Tatievskaya The Notion of Tradition in Gadamer s Hermeneutic Ontology One of the aims of Gadamer s hermeneutic ontology is the definition of the specific character of the human sciences. Gadamer
More informationSeven remarks on artistic research. Per Zetterfalk Moving Image Production, Högskolan Dalarna, Falun, Sweden
Seven remarks on artistic research Per Zetterfalk Moving Image Production, Högskolan Dalarna, Falun, Sweden 11 th ELIA Biennial Conference Nantes 2010 Seven remarks on artistic research Creativity is similar
More informationFORUM: QUALITATIVE SOCIAL RESEARCH SOZIALFORSCHUNG
FORUM: QUALITATIVE SOCIAL RESEARCH SOZIALFORSCHUNG Volume 3, No. 4, Art. 52 November 2002 Review: Henning Salling Olesen Norman K. Denzin (2002). Interpretive Interactionism (Second Edition, Series: Applied
More informationUC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Historical Understanding and the Human Sciences Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/24g4s98c Author Bevir, Mark Publication Date 2007-01-01
More informationThe Propositional vs. Hermeneutic Models of Cross-Cultural Understanding
The Propositional vs. Hermeneutic Models of Cross-Cultural Understanding Xinli Wang Philosophy Department Juanita College Huntingdon PA, 16652 USA Email: wang@juanita.edu Ling Xu Nagoya University of Commerce
More informationobservation and conceptual interpretation
1 observation and conceptual interpretation Most people will agree that observation and conceptual interpretation constitute two major ways through which human beings engage the world. Questions about
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE INTS 4522 Spring Jack Donnelly and Martin Rhodes -
PHILOSOPHY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE INTS 4522 Spring 2010 - Jack Donnelly and Martin Rhodes - What is the nature of social science and the knowledge that it produces? This course, which is intended to complement
More informationFoundations in Data Semantics. Chapter 4
Foundations in Data Semantics Chapter 4 1 Introduction IT is inherently incapable of the analog processing the human brain is capable of. Why? Digital structures consisting of 1s and 0s Rule-based system
More informationMedia as practice. a brief exchange. Nick Couldry and Mark Hobart. Published as Chapter 3. Theorising Media and Practice
This chapter was originally published in Theorising media and practice eds. B. Bräuchler & J. Postill, 2010, Oxford: Berg, 55-75. Berghahn Books. For the definitive version, click here. Media as practice
More informationPhilosophical foundations for a zigzag theory structure
Martin Andersson Stockholm School of Economics, department of Information Management martin.andersson@hhs.se ABSTRACT This paper describes a specific zigzag theory structure and relates its application
More informationIntention and Interpretation
Intention and Interpretation Some Words Criticism: Is this a good work of art (or the opposite)? Is it worth preserving (or not)? Worth recommending? (And, if so, why?) Interpretation: What does this work
More informationPhilosophical roots of discourse theory
Philosophical roots of discourse theory By Ernesto Laclau 1. Discourse theory, as conceived in the political analysis of the approach linked to the notion of hegemony whose initial formulation is to be
More informationscholars have imagined and dealt with religious people s imaginings and dealings
Religious Negotiations at the Boundaries How religious people have imagined and dealt with religious difference, and how scholars have imagined and dealt with religious people s imaginings and dealings
More informationthat would join theoretical philosophy (metaphysics) and practical philosophy (ethics)?
Kant s Critique of Judgment 1 Critique of judgment Kant s Critique of Judgment (1790) generally regarded as foundational treatise in modern philosophical aesthetics no integration of aesthetic theory into
More informationCulture in Social Theory
Totem: The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 8 6-19-2011 Culture in Social Theory Greg Beckett The University of Western Ontario Follow this and additional
More informationSidestepping the holes of holism
Sidestepping the holes of holism Tadeusz Ciecierski taci@uw.edu.pl University of Warsaw Institute of Philosophy Piotr Wilkin pwl@mimuw.edu.pl University of Warsaw Institute of Philosophy / Institute of
More informationMixed Methods: In Search of a Paradigm
Mixed Methods: In Search of a Paradigm Ralph Hall The University of New South Wales ABSTRACT The growth of mixed methods research has been accompanied by a debate over the rationale for combining what
More informationThe Question of Equilibrium in Human Action and the Everyday Paradox of Rationality
The Review of Austrian Economics, 14:2/3, 173 180, 2001. c 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. The Question of Equilibrium in Human Action and the Everyday Paradox of Rationality
More informationMitchell ABOULAFIA, Transcendence. On selfdetermination
European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy IV - 1 2012 Pragmatism and the Social Sciences: A Century of Influences and Interactions, vol. 2 Mitchell ABOULAFIA, Transcendence. On selfdetermination
More informationIntroduction and Overview
1 Introduction and Overview Invention has always been central to rhetorical theory and practice. As Richard Young and Alton Becker put it in Toward a Modern Theory of Rhetoric, The strength and worth of
More informationVirtues o f Authenticity: Essays on Plato and Socrates Republic Symposium Republic Phaedrus Phaedrus), Theaetetus
ALEXANDER NEHAMAS, Virtues o f Authenticity: Essays on Plato and Socrates (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998); xxxvi plus 372; hardback: ISBN 0691 001774, $US 75.00/ 52.00; paper: ISBN 0691 001782,
More information