A. When I collect fingernail swabs, I put them in. And then after they dry, I put them into a. I seal those boxes, I put them into an envelope
|
|
- Geraldine Tucker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 swabs by any chance? A. When I collect fingernail swabs, I put them in the dryer. And then after they dry, I put them into a box. I seal those boxes, I put them into an envelope that I seal and initial. And then that goes into the kit. And once I seal the kit and that kit is released to the crime lab -- to the police. all I do. After that, that's 0 Q. So, you conduct no analysis of any kind on the swab from the fingernails; is that correct? A. That's correct. Q. You do not know if anybody else would have done that; is that correct? A. No one that I know of. Q. Okay. And, certainly, no one at your direction would have done? You didn't say: Do an analysis of these swabs? A. That's correct. No further questions at this 0 time. Very briefly, Judge. REDIRECT EXAMINATION BY Q. Mr. Greenlee was talking to you about evidence of sexual assault outside of what she had told you. We
2 do have things that you found that corroborate what she had told you, correct? A. That's correct. Q. Such as? A. The abrasions on her neck is consistent with the strangulation that she told me about. Q. Okay. And there were abrasions on both sides of the neck, correct? A. There was abrasions on the right side of the 0 neck. And on the left side of the neck, there was point tenderness. Q. That would be consistent with a thumb, would it not? A. It's possible. Q. Just like the abrasions would be consistent with fingers, correct? A. Correct. Pass the witness. RECROSS-EXAMINATION 0 BY Q. Could it be possible, Ms. Oldham, that those scratches and/or abrasions could have gotten there some other way? A. It's possible. Q. So, your testimony is not saying this is
3 absolutely how it got there? A. That's correct. No further questions. Nothing further from this witness. I'm concerned. She may be excused as far as You are excused. Thank you, ma'am. 0 Call your next witness. THE BAILIFF: Sergeant Cliff Blomberg. This witness needs to be sworn, Judge. 0 (Witness sworn) C.S. BLOMBERG, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION BY Q. Please introduce yourself to the jury and spell your name for our court reporter. A. I'm C.S. Blomberg. I'm a retired sergeant from the Houston Police Department. B-l-o-m-b-e-r-g. Last name is Q. And currently do you work for the Houston Police Department?
4 A. No, I do not. Q. Okay. Why not? A. I decided to retire in October of 0. Q. Okay. How long had you been with HPD? A. Thirty years. Q. Now, during your 0 years, let's break that down. Where were you? You started off in patrol, I presume? A. Right. Well, you start off in the academy and 0 you're a cadet and then graduate from there. I spent the first years as a patrol officer working the streets. Just about all of that was nightshift. After that, I promoted in July of 0 to sergeant and spent a year in the jail as a supervisor in the jail at Westside. And after that year, I became a -- went back to patrol and was a patrol sergeant for another six years. And in August of, I became an investigative sergeant in the Family Violence Unit and spent about six years there. And another six years I finished up in the 0 Sex Crimes Unit. Q. And let me ask you if you can give the jury kind of a thumbnail sketch as to the type of training you had for investigating things like sex crimes? A. We attend in-service training throughout every year. And after -- even in patrol, we're exposed to
5 some of that. And there was continuing in-service training, as I was an investigator also. Plus, there were other officers and sergeants when you first came in that gave you some training also. Q. And in the interest of full disclosure, you and I have worked together before? A. Yes. Q. Let's go through the basics of a sexual assault investigation. In any sexual assault investigation, 0 usually you have a patrolman that shows up first, right? A. That's right. May we approach? You may. (At the Bench, on the record) I'm going to object to this line of questioning. involved in this case. person. I don't think this officer was I thought he was the buccal swab He did an investigation on 0 it, but the main thing is the buccal swab. I think any other testimony with regard to talking about sexual assault, I think it's irrelevant from this witness. Judge, this is my witness. He can still give irrelevant
6 0 testimony and I can object to that. I don't think that precludes that, the objection anything. I think that how a sexual 0 assault investigation works in a sexual assault case is relevant. I think he's right. Overruled. (Open court, defendant and jury present) Q. (By Mr. McClees) Usually the first person to respond is a patrol officer; is that correct? A. That's correct. Q. He makes a report? A. Correct. This is leading. I'd ask that he ask a question. I'll rephrase. Overruled. 0 Q. (By Mr. McClees) When a report is generated, what happens next? A. It's -- usually by the next day it shows up in the sex crimes office after it's been printed out overnight. Q. Okay. And from there, what happens? A. All the cases that are made from the previous day are gathered up, they're taken to our -- what we call the admin sergeant and he looks through the reports
7 and divides them up amongst the two squads we had at the in our unit. Q. You were not the admin sergeant? A. No, I was not. Q. You were a sergeant of one of the two squads? A. One of the squads. Q. Okay. And from there, the report goes from the admin sergeant to you and what do you do? A. I get the reports and I divide them up amongst 0 my officers. I had at the time five or six officers. I'd normally keep one for myself. If I wasn't too busy 0 supervising their cases, I would work one of the cases also. Q. So, you get the initial information from the report and then you decide how much further investigation is necessary depending on a case-by-case basis? A. That's correct. Q. Okay. Now, in this situation, you got the report, correct? A. Yes, I did. Q. Did you assign it out or did this one stay with you? A. This one I decided to keep for myself. Q. Any particular reason or is it --
8 0 A. No. It just helps distribute the workload. Q. And in doing that, did you see there was potentially the need for a buccal swab? A. Yes, I did. Q. And we'll go over that in just a minute. Don't go into anything he said, but did you have an opportunity to meet, albeit briefly, with Brittaney Rivers? A. Yes, I did. Q. Okay. That had to be re-scheduled a couple of times? A. It did. Q. Was that because of kids or -- A. Mostly -- This is leading, Your Honor. I'll ask it open-ended. I'm sorry. Please. 0 Q. (By Mr. McClees) So, I believe you said you needed -- well, let me ask you this. A buccal swab -- A. Right. Q. -- what is a buccal swab? A. It's basically you take a Q-tip. I would use two normally. (indicating). And it's a long Q-tip about that long And you swab the inside of somebody's
9 0 mouth. Q. Let me ask you this. For purposes of the record, you said about that long. A. Right. Q. You held your fingers out. Would that be about -- A. About inches or so. Q. So, you take it. Does it come in certain packaging? A. It comes in like a sterile white package. There's two in a package. It's paper. 0 Q. And you're shown how to do this? A. Yes. Q. Have you done a buccal swab or two in your day? A. Yes, I have. Q. Do you have an idea of how many? A. No, I don't. A few hundred. Q. You open it up and it's this long Q-tip. What do you do with this long Q-tip? A. We put on gloves, for one thing, sterile gloves. And then we'll ask the person we need the buccal swab from to open their mouth and we insert the buccal swab -- I do it one at a time -- and rub the inside of their cheeks in the upper pallet and below their tongue to collect skin cells, basically, is what
10 we're doing. Q. You collect the skin cells. What's the purpose of collecting those? A. Later on for DNA comparison and analysis. Q. That would be to compare the known sample from the person you took to the sample of whatever you're trying to get DNA from? A. That's correct. Q. So, now in this case you spoke to Brittaney 0 Rivers. And after speaking with her, did you come to the conclusion that you needed to get buccal swabs from one person or multiple? A. Two people. Q. Okay. Was one of those people a -- This is leading, Your Honor. Q. (By Mr. McClees) Who were the people? A. I determined, after speaking to her, that I needed to get a buccal swab from a consensual -- what she described as a consensual sex partner. 0 Objection. What's your objection, sir? First of all, this is nonresponsive. It's hearsay. Sustained. Q. (By Mr. McClees) All right. How many buccal
11 swabs did you get? A. I obtained two sets of buccal swabs. Q. Okay. Who were they from? A. One was from Kevin Queeny and Mr. Penright, Carlton Penright. Q. What made you think you needed a buccal swab from Kevin Queeny? A. He was a consensual sex partner of Ms. Rivers. Objection. That's hearsay. 0 May we approach? Judge, this is not hearsay. You may. (At the Bench, on the record) Hearsay goes to the truth of the matter asserted, regardless if the statement was true or not true. This puts him on notice as to why he needed to get the buccal swab. question why did he do it. Otherwise, people would 0 The problem is this: He said he was told this was consensual sex, which immediately suggests that one person was consensual, but the other person it was not. I think he can testify that he had information that he should get it, but he can't get into whether it's consensual. That is hearsay and that is not an -- there's no exception for that.
12 There's nothing to do with -- it does go to the issue of the truth of the matter asserted. It does, yes. You are right -- Judge, the purpose of this is not for the truth of the matter -- Steven, may I finish? It's not for the truth of the matter asserted. It is because -- and this happens in every criminal case -- the officer is put on notice of something. Otherwise, 0 the jury is left to wonder why on earth does he pick this random person. And it doesn't matter -- I have to agree. But it's a conclusion that does go to the truth. It sets up the paradigm one was consensual, one was not. That's the problem with making that statement. received -- He can say based on information he Isn't that already out? What? 0 One was consensual and one wasn't? That came out through Ms. Rivers. That's not a true statement. Because when I tried to get into the nature of the
13 relationship, the State objected and you sustained the objection. That never came out. That's not true. It did come out that she had consensual sex with him. I asked her the question of around the time of January th and she said that she did. What she said was the relationship was two weeks old. I asked what was the nature of the relationship. She said normal. I then 0 asked -- the State objected, we came up here. You sustained their objection. So, that question was never raised. All she said was it was normal. That's not true, Judge. We have the record here. We do. And she said, when I was questioning her -- not when Mr. Greenlee was -- that she had sex with him around that time. 0 testimony being that way. I don't remember the Regardless, Judge, that puts -- it's not for the truth of the matter asserted. If it's not for the truth of the matter asserted -- Any reason we're going through this at all? So the jury can understand
14 why he took it from one person and why he took it from another. Why is it relevant? It's relevant because there's a mixture of DNA in there, Judge, and the jury has to understand what the purpose of that is. I'm going to overrule the objection. I'll allow it in. (Open court, defendant and jury present) 0 0 Q. (By Mr. McClees) You took how many buccal swabs? A. Two sets. Q. Okay. First, you said, from? A. Kenneth Queeny. Q. Okay. And that was because why? A. He was a consensual sex partner. Q. Okay. The second one you took was from whom? A. Carlton Penright. Q. All right. Do you see Carlton Penright in this courtroom? A. Yes, sir. Q. Can you identify him by something he's wearing? A. The man with -- it's like a gray or black plaid shirt. Judge, may the record reflect
15 he's identified the defendant? The record will so reflect. 0 0 Q. (By Mr. McClees) Did you get a buccal swab from Carlton Penright? A. Yes, I did. Q. And that was -- you actually -- the process of doing that, you came to court to do that? A. Yes. I got a court order. I believe it was here in the courtroom or the next room over. Q. You got that done through the basic same process that you mentioned earlier, did you not? A. Yes. There was a court order and I obtained it through the same process I would normally do that. Q. I'm asking it poorly. It's after lunch and I'm crashing. Did you put on the gloves? A. Yes. Q. Did you open up the sterile part from the buccal swab? A. Yes. May I approach the witness, Your Honor? You may. Q. (By Mr. McClees) I show you State's Exhibit No. and State's Exhibit No.. Do you see these, sir
16 0 (indicating)? A. Yes, I do. Q. Okay. Let's start in chronological order. What is State's Exhibit No. (indicating)? A. Those are buccal swabs from that's. No. are the suspect -- buccal swabs from Carlton Penright. Q. Okay. What is Exhibit No.? A. No. are the buccal swabs from Kenneth Queeny. 0 Your Honor, I tender State's Exhibit No. and to opposing counsel and offer into evidence. (State's Exhibit No. and Offered) No objections. Admitted without objection. 0 (State's Exhibit No. and Admitted) Q. (By Mr. McClees) Okay. After you obtained the buccal swabs in Exhibits and, what did you do with them? A. I put them in the boxes that you see now. And from there, I'd take them and tag them and place -- or have them placed in our property room. Q. All right. Do you submit them for further analysis? A. What is done -- yes, sir -- submitted through a
17 form on the computer as part of the report that goes to the crime lab. And from there, the crime lab will pick those up from the property room. Pass the witness. CROSS-EXAMINATION 0 0 BY Q. What is the procedure in order to get a buccal swab? A. It can be either voluntarily, asking the person for the buccal swabs, or there could be a court order involved. Q. In this case, that was done voluntarily; is that correct? A. On Mr. Penright? Q. Yes, sir. A. Yes, sir. Q. I was standing there when you did it, was I not? A. Yes, sir. Q. So, there was no resistance on anyone's part in order to get the buccal swab, was there? A. No, sir. Q. And other than a relatively brief conversation that you had with Ms. Rivers, did you have any other involvement with this case?
18 0 0 A. I talked to an Alvin Miller, I believe. Q. Other than that, did you have any other involvement in this case? A. Other than reading the reports and the report from the hospital. Q. Nothing else? A. That was it. Q. I assume you did not make the scene of this alleged incident; is that correct? A. I did not. Q. Did you ever speak with Officer Casas? A. No, I did not. Q. Have you ever spoken with Ms. Oldham? A. Oldham? Q. Yes, sir. A. I don't recall speaking to anybody by that name. Q. Did you speak with any medical people of any kind? A. Not on this case. Q. And I assume the only reason you say the swab from Mr. Queeny was consensual is that is what you were told; is that correct? A. The question again? Q. You testified that you have one swab that was
1 MR. ROBERT LOPER: I have nothing. 3 THE COURT: Thank you. You're. 5 MS. BARNETT: May we approach? 7 (At the bench, off the record.
167 April Palatino - March 7, 2010 Redirect Examination by Ms. Barnett 1 MR. ROBERT LOPER: I have nothing 2 further, Judge. 3 THE COURT: Thank you. You're 4 excused. 5 MS. BARNETT: May we approach? 6 THE
More informationOfficer Damon Morton - April 15, 2014 Direct Examination by Ms. Vohra OFFICER DAMON MORTON, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:
0 0 OFFICER DAMON MORTON, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MS. VOHRA: Q. Officer Morton, good afternoon. Can you introduce yourself to the jury. A. My name is Damon
More informationState, call your next.
sir. You're free to go. THE COURT: All right. Thank you, State, call your next. MR. GILLIAM: State calls Deputy Richard Berrios. THE COURT: All right. Come on up here, Deputy. 0 THE BAILIFF: Judge, this
More informationTHE BAILIFF: All rise for the jury. (Recess taken.) MS. OSWALD: State would call Officer. MS. OSWALD: This witness has not been. (Witness sworn.
THE BAILIFF: All rise for the jury. (Recess taken.) THE COURT: Let's bring your next witness up, please. 0 0 MS. OSWALD: State would call Officer Jason Kelly to the stand. THE COURT: Why don't you get
More informationYou may proceed. DEPUTY BERNAL, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION
Deputy Bernal. Can you spell that. B-E-R-N-A-L, I believe. I'm sure he will spell it for us. 0 0 You may proceed. DEPUTY BERNAL, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION BY
More information2 THE COURT: All right. You may. 4 MS. BARNETT: Thank you, Your Honor. 6 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:
138 Jonathan French- March 7, 2010 Recross-Examination by Mr. Robert Loper 1 (Witness sworn.) 2 THE COURT: All right. You may 3 proceed. 4 MS. BARNETT: Thank you, Your Honor. 5 APRIL PALATINO, 6 having
More informationQ. That's all from the OC spray, right? MR. SCOTT: Okay. Pass the. THE COURT: State? MR. SCOTT: Yes, Your Honor. State, call your next.
Q. That's all from the OC spray, right? A. That's correct. MR. SCOTT: Okay. Pass the witness, Your Honor. THE COURT: State? MR. GILLIAM: Nothing further, Your Honor. THE COURT: May he be excused? MR. SCOTT:
More informationCROSS-EXAMINATION. Q. Well, just to make sure that we're all clear, Seitrich Buckner's DNA was not on any of the -- either of the
CROSS-EXAMINATION 0 0 BY MS. SCARDINO: Q. Well, just to make sure that we're all clear, Seitrich Buckner's DNA was not on any of the -- either of the items that you tested; is that correct? A. Correct.
More informationTestimony of Kay Norris
Testimony of Kay Norris DIRECT EXAMINATION 2 3 BY MS. SHERRI WALLACE: 4 Q. Ms. Norris, are you sick? 5 A. I am very sick. I have got strep 6 throat. 7 Q. I'm sorry you have to be down here. I 8 will try
More information2 THE COURT: Nothing further, Ms. Epley?
171 Kimberly Zeller - May 3, 2012 Cross-Examination by Mr. Martin 1 Pass the witness. 2 THE COURT: Nothing further, Ms. Epley? 3 MS. EPLEY: Nothing further, Your Honor. 4 THE COURT: Okay. You're excused.
More informationTHE COURT: May she be excused? MS. COREY: Yes, sir. MR. STROLLA: Yes, sir. (Witness excused.) THE COURT: Next witness, Mr. Strolla.
the following day? No. MS. COREY: Thank you. Nothing further, Your 0 Honor. THE COURT: May she be excused? MS. COREY: Yes, sir. MR. STROLL: Yes, sir. THE COURT: Thank you, ma'am. You're excused. (Witness
More informationCall your first witness, please. MS. ALLEN: Lieutenant Ohland. THE COURT: All right. Lieutenant, if. you'll have a seat on the witness stand, please.
0 0 Call your first witness, please. MS. ALLEN: Lieutenant Ohland. THE COURT: All right. Lieutenant, if you'll have a seat on the witness stand, please. WITNESS: Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT: Ms. Allen,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND
- IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND STATE OF MARYLAND vs. Criminal Trial 0-X KEITH A. WASHINGTON, Defendant. / REPORTER'S OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS (Trial on the Merits)
More informationQ. But in reality, the bond had already been. revoked, hadn't it? It was already set at zero bond. before September 21st, specifically on September --
0 0 September st, correct? Q. But in reality, the bond had already been revoked, hadn't it? It was already set at zero bond before September st, specifically on September -- A. The bond was revoked on
More informationvictims' families know what's coming up just to (Jury in at 1:10 p.m..) THE COURT: All right. Welcome back,
0 you back in an hour. (Lunch recess.) THE COURT: ll right. We ready to resume, Ms. Corey? MS. COREY: May I just let my witnesses -- my victims' families know what's coming up just to give them fair warning?
More informationhaving been first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION Q. Can you please state your name and spell your
0 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MS. COLLINS: Q. Can you please state your name and spell your first and last name? A. Yes. I'm Tiffani Dusang. T-i-f-f-a-n-i.
More informationREPORTER'S RECORD VOLUME 4 OF 9 VOLUMES TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO FIRST COURT OF APPEALS NO CR FILED IN * * * * * *
REPORTER'S RECORD VOLUME OF VOLUMES TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 0 FIRST COURT OF APPEALS NO. 0--00-CR FILED IN st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS // :: PM STATE OF TEXAS VS. DONALD NEALEY * * * * * * IN THE
More informationTestimony of David Rogers
Testimony of David Rogers DIRECT EXAMINATION 16 17 BY MR. S. PRESTON DOUGLASS, JR.: 18 A. Mr. Rogers, would you tell the jury 19 what you do for a living? 20 21 THE COURT: State your name and spell 22
More informationP R O C E E D I N G S ; and the accompanying case on bond is Both sides ready to proceed? MS. TURNER: State's ready.
0 P R O C E E D I N G S THE COURT: This is Cause No., ; and the accompanying case on bond is. Both sides ready to proceed? MR. LEWIS: We are ready, Your Honor. MS. TURNER: State's ready. THE COURT: Folks
More informationP R O C E E D I N G S. February 23, (Jury seated.) Welcome back, folks.
P R O C E E D I N G S February, 0 THE BAILIFF: All rise for the jury. (Jury seated.) THE COURT: All right. Y'all may be seated. Welcome back, folks. All right. State, call your next 0 witness. MR. GILLIAM:
More informationDIRECT EXAMINATION. Q. Go ahead and state and spell your name for the. A. Rick Chambers, R-I-C-K C-H-A-M-B-E-R-S.
1 [Counsel confer.] MS. SHEIN: Your Honor, that s all we have for this witness. MR. MALCOLM: Nothing further for this witness, Your Honor. THE COURT: Can this witness be excused? MS. SHEIN: Yes, he can.
More informationTestimony of Barry Dickey
Testimony of Barry Dickey DIRECT EXAMINATION 13 14 BY MR. GREG DAVIS: 15 Q. State your name. 16 A. My name is Barry Gene Dickey, 17 D-I-C-K-E-Y. 18 Q. Okay. Sir, how old a man are you? 19 A. 32 years old.
More informationWas one of those witnesses then Steve Smith? Now did you ever learn the name of the. civilian who helped you pull out Jordan Davis from the
scene? Correct. Was one of those witnesses then Steve Smith? Now did you ever learn the name of the civilian who helped you pull out Jordan Davis from the car? No, ma'am. I did not. MS. WOLFSON: I have
More informationTestimony of Jack Kolbye
Testimony of Jack Kolbye DIRECT EXAMINATION 12 13 BY MR. GREG DAVIS: 14 Q. All right. Please tell us your full 15 name. 16 A. Jack Kolbye, K-O-L-B-Y-E. 17 Q. All right. Mr. Kolbye, how are you 18 employed?
More informationTHE COURT: Mr. Strolla? MR. STROLLA: So excused, Your Honor. THE COURT: All right. Thank you, sir. (Witness excused.)
0 THE COURT: Mr. Strolla? MR. STROLL: So excused, Your Honor. THE COURT: ll right. Thank you, sir. You're excused. (Witness excused.) THE COURT: The state's next witness. MR. GUY: Detective Mark Musser,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE THANG NGUYEN BARRETT, JUDGE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE THANG NGUYEN BARRETT, JUDGE DEPARTMENT NO. 0 0 ---o0o--- THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ) CALIFORNIA,
More information870173/3S ORIGINAL SEP Troy C. Bennett, Jr., Clerk THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS VS.
CAUSE NO. 0/S THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. RODNEY REED X X X X X IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 0 REPORTER'S RECORD JURY TRIAL GUILT/INNOCENCE MAY, 0 MORNING SESSION VOLUME
More information2 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: 5 Q. Good morning, Dr. Haden-Pinneri. Could you. 7 A. Sure. I'm Dr. Kathryn Haden-Pinneri.
7 1 KATHRYN HADEN-PINNERI, M.D., 2 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: 3 DIRECT EXAMINATION 4 BY MR. REED: 5 Q. Good morning, Dr. Haden-Pinneri. Could you 6 please introduce yourself to
More information3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1 SUPREME COURT SUPERIOR COURT 2 NO. S124131 NO. CF-5733 3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 4 -ooo- 5 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ) 6 CALIFORNIA, ) TRIAL ) VOLUME 52 7 PLAINTIFF AND ) RESPONDENT,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2017 EXHIBIT I
EXHIBIT I Page 9 2 Q. So I'll try to help you with that. 3 A. Okay. 4 Q. Okay. And do you recall when you 5 looked at the attachment to the consignment 6 agreement between your company and Ms. Lutz 7 that
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * v. * T-C * * * * * * * * * HEARING TRANSCRIPT * * * * * * * * *
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * AD OJI * v. * 0-001-T-C VERIZON WEST VIRGINIA, INC.,* * * * * * * * * * HEARING TRANSCRIPT * * * * * * * * * BEFORE: RONNIE MCCANN,
More informationTestimony of Officer David Waddell
Testimony of Officer David Waddell BY MR. GREG DAVIS: 14 Q. Would you please tell us your full 15 name. 16 A. David Wayne Waddell. 17 Q. And, Mr. Waddell, how are you 18 employed, at this time? 19 A. I'm
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HONORABLE EUGENIA EYHERABIDE DEPARTMENT 47
0 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HONORABLE EUGENIA EYHERABIDE DEPARTMENT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE ) OF CALIFORNIA, ) ) CD0 ) DA NO. ADX0 PLAINTIFF,
More information) V. ) AT LAW NO. 9 ) JOVAN PHILLIP VOJVODIC ) HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
October, REPORTER'S RECORD VOLUME OF VOLUME(S) TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS ) IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT ) V. ) AT LAW NO. ) JOVAN PHILLIP VOJVODIC ) HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 0 TESTIMONY OF CARLY
More informationCondcnsclt! 11. Page 123 Page A. Johnnycake Road. 2 Q. And how close to the -- where Rolling Road. 3 crosses Johnnycake is it?
Condcnsclt! 11 Page 123 Page 125 1 MS. GUTIERREZ: See, I object - 1 A. Johnnycake Road. 2 THE COURT: Overruled. 2 Q. And how close to the -- where Rolling Road 3 MS. GUTIERREZ: (Inaudible) objection. 3
More informationLadies and gentlemen, this DWAYNE WOLF, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION
Ladies and gentlemen, this 0 witness has previously been sworn. Proceed, please. DWAYNE WOLF, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MS. JOHNSON: Q. Sir, could you please
More informationTestimony of Kathryn Long
Testimony of Kathryn Long DIRECT EXAMINATION 18 19 BY MR. GREG DAVIS: 20 Q. Would you please tell us your full 21 name. 22 A. My name is Kathryn Long. L-o-n-g. 23 Q. Ms. Long, how are you employed? 24
More informationExhibit B. Case: 1:11-cv Document #: Filed: 01/07/13 Page 1 of 174 PageID #:2078. Huon v. Breaking Media et al Doc. 190 Att.
Huon v. Breaking Media et al Doc. 0 Att. Case: :-cv-00 Document #: - Filed: 0/0/ Page of PageID #:0 Exhibit B Dockets.Justia.com Case: :-cv-00 Document #: - Filed: 0/0/ Page of PageID #:0 IN THE CIRCUIT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. KELLY VARANO, As Parent and Natural Guardian Of Infant JEREMY BOHN,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONONDAGA: CIVIL PART RJI No. -- Index No. 0- KELLY VARANO, As Parent and Natural Guardian Of Infant JEREMY BOHN, vs. Plaintiffs, FORBA HOLDINGS, LLC, FORBA,
More informationv. 15 Cr. 536 (PGG) Trial New York, N.Y. November 29, :40 a.m. HON. PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge -and a jury- APPEARANCES
HBTTTUZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Cr. (PGG) KALEIL ISAZA TUZMAN, et al., Defendants. ------------------------------x
More information( A-228 ) Dr. Mills - Defendants - Direct. 2 Defendants, after having been first duly sworn by the Clerk
( - ) Dr. Mills - Defendants - Direct EDWRD ML L S, M.D., a witness called by the Defendants, after having been first duly sworn by the Clerk of the Court, took the witness stand and testified as follows:
More informationPayne vs. AMA Godby. December 8, Deposition of: Cassandra Castillo. In the Matter of:
Deposition of: Cassandra Castillo December 8, 2015 In the Matter of: 1075 Peachtree St. NE, Suite 3625 Atlanta, GA, 30309 800.808.4958 calendar-ga@veritext.com 770.343.9696 1 IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON
More informationTestimony of Tom Bevel (2)
Testimony of Tom Bevel (2) DIRECT EXAMINATION (Resumed) 16 17 BY MR. GREG DAVIS: 18 Q. Mr. Bevel, yesterday, as we were 19 leaving, we were talking about the vacuum cleaner, 20 State's Exhibit No. 93,
More informationORIGINAL. i 1. SEP Troy C. Bennett, Jr., Clerk CAUSE NO THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS RODNEY REED
t r /! r. i CAUSE NO. 0 THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. RODNEY REED X X X X X N THE DSTRCT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS ST JUDCAL DSTRCT!. 0 REPORTERtS RECORD JURY TRAL GULT/NNOCENCE MAY, AFTERNOON SESSON 0 VOLUME
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Strafford, ss Judicial Branch Superior Court No. -0-CV-00 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * LINDA-MARIE NAKAMURA -v- MICHAEL GILL AND MORTGAGE SPECIALISTS, INC. * * * * * * * *
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HEARING TRANSCRIPT * * * * * * * * *
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * TLC PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, INC. * --MC-CC * * * * * * * * * * HEARING TRANSCRIPT * * * * * * * * * BEFORE: KEITH GEORGE, Administrative
More informationCase 1:12-cv GBL-TRJ Document Filed 11/21/12 Page 1 of 198 PageID# 2384
Case 1:12-cv-00246-GBL-TRJ Document 119-3 Filed 11/21/12 Page 1 of 198 PageID# 2384 1 Volume I Pages 1 to 193 Exhibits 1-21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria
More informationReporter's Transcript of Proceedings TESTIMONY OF CARL MARINO Wednesday, December 13,
0 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA BEFORE THE HONORABLE CHARLES BEN BURCH, JUDGE PRESIDING DEPARTMENT NUMBER ---ooo--- ARDA AKSU, ) ) Petitioner, ) Case No. MSD 0-0 ) FAMILY LAW TRIAL
More information,-FR.. BURNE T SCAN FROM THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET N
,-FR.. BURNE T SCAN FROM THE DOCESE OF JOLET N0. - Redacted April01. Released April01 1 1 1 1.! 1 1 Q. Alright. 'd like to have you tell us 1 Well, first of all, could you just hold up this 1 picture,
More information[3/24/2011] George Ross March 24, 2011
2 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK 3 4 ALM UNLIMITED, INC., as successor-in-interest to ALM INTERNATIONAL 5 CORP., 6 Plaintiff, 7 -against- 8 DONALD J. TRUMP, 9 Defendant. 0 Index
More informationv. 15 Cr. 536 (PGG) Trial New York, N.Y. December 7, :35 a.m. HON. PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge -and a jury- APPEARANCES
HCTTUZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Cr. (PGG) KALEIL ISAZA TUZMAN, et al., Defendants. ------------------------------x
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION 210 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN RE RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY ) PATENT AND CONTRACT LITIGATION ) ) THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ANNE ANDERSON, ET AL V. W. R. GRACE & CO., ET AL. Forty-First Day of Trial
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Civil Action No. 82-1672-S SKINNER, D. J. And a Jury ANNE ANDERSON, ET AL V. W. R. GRACE & CO., ET AL Forty-First Day of Trial APPEARANCES: Schlichtmann,
More informationCourt Filings 2000 Trial
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU 19952002 Court Filings 2000 Trial 142000 Jury Questionnaire Terry H. Gilbert Attorney for Sheppard Estate George H. Carr Attorney for Sheppard Estate How
More informationBEFORE THE IDAHO STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE
BEFORE THE IDAHO STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE In the Matter of: ) ) ANN DE JONG, M.D. ) Case No. License No. M-0, ) BOM-- ) Respondent. ) ) HEARING BEFORE KENNETH L. MALLEA, HEARING OFFICER PLACE: Idaho State
More information(Jury in at 9:20 a.m..) THE COURT: Good morning, folks. Welcome. back. Y'all can have a seat. As I said before
0 THE COURT: nd I know the jury is ready to go so let's bring them on in. (Jury in at : a.m..) THE COURT: Good morning, folks. Welcome back. Y'all can have a seat. s I said before y'all came out, I said
More informationORIGINAL. Troy C.8ennett, Jr., Clerk THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS RODNEY REED 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
.CAUSE NO. 0 /f' THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. RODNEY REED X X X X X N THE DSTRCT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS ST JUDCAL DSTRCT REPORTER'S RECORD JURY TRAL GULT/NNOCENCE MAY, MORNNG SESSON VOLUME OF / ORGNAL
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA BEFORE THE HONORABLE WINIFRED Y. SMITH, JUDGE PRESIDING DEPARTMENT NUMBER 21.
0 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA BEFORE THE HONORABLE WINIFRED Y. SMITH, JUDGE PRESIDING DEPARTMENT NUMBER ---ooo--- COORDINATION PROCEEDING ) SPECIAL TITLE (RULE.0) ) ) ROUNDUP PRODUCTS
More informationDr. Keats - Defendant - Direct. plaintiff. And now we will hear from a witness
Dr. Keats - Defendant - Direct B plaintiff. nd now we will hear from a witness called by the defendant on its behalf. So, Mr. Code, you may call your witness. MR. CODE: Thank you, Your Honor. Your Honor,
More informationCase 1:13-cr GAO Document 1423 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case :-cr-0-gao Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Criminal Action v. ) No. -0-GAO ) DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV,
More informationTHE CASE OF MY FAVORITE BOOK
Page 1 of 5 THE CASE OF MY FAVORITE BOOK Creating a reading class skit The act of drama in the classroom provides a stage where all can shine, even the weakest reader. Encourage the students to memorize
More informationAaah just some additional questions that-that we had and we wanted to talk to you in person, okay?
November 11, 2014 1:14 p.m. Special Agent () Federal Bureau of Investigation = AU = AU DOJ Trial Attorney = Unintelligible= Ul AU Today is Wednesday, November l2 1 h, 2014, 1:14 p.m. I am Special Agent,
More informationCRM344 Transcript 4. ********** State s opening *************
********** State s opening ************* CRM344 Transcript 4 13) Prosecutor Trotter: Your Honor, Counsel, members of the jury, the evidence in this case is going to show that at 9:30 in the morning, January
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Criminal Action v. ) No. -000-GAO ) DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, also ) known as Jahar Tsarni, )
More informationEIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CIVIL/CRIMINAL DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA ' )) BEFORE THE HONORABLE VALORIE J. VEGA, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
EIGHTH JUDICIL DISTRICT COURT CIVIL/CRIMINL DIVISION CLRK COUNTY, NEVD ' )) 'n THE STTE OF NEVD, ) ) ) CSE NO. C Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) KIRSTIN BLISE LOBTO, ) ) Defendant. ) ) DEPT. NO. II Transcripts
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANYadd, -vs- Plaintiffs, MEDICAL SERVICE CENTER OF
More informationREPORTER'S RECORD TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO DCV-0235-B
THERESA GAMEZ, PLAINTIFF V. REPORTER'S RECORD TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 0-DCV-0-B DILLON TRANSPORT, INC.; DILLON TRANSPORT, INC., IN ITS COMMON OR ASSUMED NAME; KENNETH EUGENE JENNINGS AND MIGUEL A. GARCIA,
More informationDOCKET NO. SA-516 APPENDIX 12 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, DC. INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT RICHARD ORTIZ NOVEMBER 19, 1996 (25 pages)
DOCKET NO. SA- APPENDIX NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, DC INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT RICHARD ORTIZ NOVEMBER, ( pages) - UNITED BEFORE THE STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:10-cv-07747-AK-CW Document 62 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 129 Page ID #:1000 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION 3 HONORABLE ALEX KOZINSKI 4 UNITED
More informationRegistered Professional Reporter
Filing # 7828 E-Filed 09//2018 07:41 : PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CRIMINAL NO. l5-oo6cfano STATE OF FLORIDA, VS. JOHN N. JONCHUCK,
More informationRichard Hoadley Thanks Kevin. Now, I'd like each of you to use your keyboards to try and reconstruct some of the complexities of those sounds.
The sound of silence Recreating sounds Alan's told me that instruments sound different, because of the mixture of harmonics that go with the fundamental. I've got a recording of his saxophone here, a sound
More information(Whereupon, CARMINE TAYLOR WELCH. was called as a witness, duly sworn, and testified as BY MR. SEGAL:
(Whereupon, CRMINE TYLOR WELCH "> was called as a witness, duly sworn, and testified as follows:) D I R E C T E X M I N T I O N :1 p.m. BY MR. SEGL: Ms. Welch, would you be good enough to tell us your
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 13-1352 In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF OHIO, Petitioner, v. DARIUS CLARK, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO JOINT APPENDIX TIMOTHY J. MCGINTY Cuyahoga
More informationUNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 1004, MJ [Col SPATH]: The commission is called to order.
0 [The R.M.C. 0 session was called to order at 00, February.] MJ [Col SPATH]: The commission is called to order. The same parties who were present yesterday are again present. Mr. al Nashiri is not here.
More information* * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA - OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA II THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, II Plaintiff, VS. CASE NO. CF-- II RICHARD WAYNE MARDIS, II Defendant. 0 * * * * * * TRANSCRIPT OF PLEA & SENTENCING
More informationUNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 0902, MJ [Col SPATH]: The commission is called to order.
0 [The R.M.C. 0 session was called to order at 00, November.] MJ [Col SPATH]: The commission is called to order. On the government side, the same parties are present who were present yesterday. Mr. Miller,
More informationWEST VIRGINIA MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
2 WEST VIRGINIA MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION 3 4 IN THE MATTER OF: 5 THE INVESTIGATION OF THE APRIL 5, 200 MINE EXPLOSION 6 AT UPPER BIG BRANCH MINE 7 8 9 0 The interview of RAGHUVEER R. THADISINA,
More informationFILED: ROCKLAND COUNTY CLERK 01/25/ :29 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/25/2018
â SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ROCKLAND x ANNA TIHIN, Plaintiff, - against - Index# 032018/2016 MARTIN S. RUTSTEIN and BRENDA RUTSTEIN, Defendants. x Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:10 a.m.
More informationDECISION. IN THE MATTER OF The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Act, S.N. l992, c.r-l7 ( Act ) AND
IN THE MATTER OF The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Act, S.N. l992, c.r-l7 ( Act ) AND The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Public Complaints Regulations, CNR 970/96 ( Regulations ) AND IN THE MATTER of
More informationDEIDENTIFIED DEPOSITION SURGICAL ONCOLOGY FELLOW TESTIFIES IN PRE-TRIAL HEARING IN FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE SEPSIS CASE RESULTING IN DEATH OF PATIENT 1
DEIDENTIFIED DEPOSITION SURGICAL ONCOLOGY FELLOW TESTIFIES IN PRE-TRIAL HEARING IN FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE SEPSIS CASE RESULTING IN DEATH OF PATIENT 2 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF 3 4,
More informationA Children's Play. By Francis Giordano
A Children's Play By Francis Giordano Copyright Francis Giordano, 2013 The music for this piece is to be found just by moving at this very Web-Site. Please enjoy the play with the sound of silentmelodies.com.
More informationNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, DC INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT CLYDE ANTROBUS NOVEMBER 18, 1996
DOCKET NO. SA- APPENDIX NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, DC INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT CLYDE ANTROBUS NOVEMBER, ( pages) -----------------x BEFORE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
More informationWhen did you realize that this was a police officer shooting? I knew it right from the start. The police were everywhere.
State your name and spell the last name. Daniel O Neal. O-N-E-A-L State your occupation Medical examiner. When did you realize that this was a police officer shooting? I knew it right from the start. The
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
Volume Pages - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Before The Honorable Vince Chhabria, Judge EDWARD HARDEMAN, Plaintiff, VS. MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) NO. C -00 VC
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JAMES P. CHASSE, JR.; JAMES P. ) CHASSE; LINDA GERBER; and MARK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JAMES P. CHASSE, JR.; JAMES P. ) CHASSE; LINDA GERBER; and MARK COPY CHASSE, individually and in his capacity as Personal Representative )
More informationCase: 2:08-cv GLF-NMK Doc #: 96-8 Filed: 05/07/10 Page: 1 of 14 PAGEID #: 1940
Case: 2:08-cv-00575-GLF-NMK Doc #: 96-8 Filed: 05/07/10 Page: 1 of 14 PAGEID #: 1940 Case: 2:08-cv-00575-GLF-NMK Doc #: 96-8 Filed: 05/07/10 Page: 2 of 14 PAGEID Page #: 1941 4320 IN THE MATTER OF THE
More informationArmando Quintanilla. Francis C. Peterson, et al. v. Kevin Miranda, et al. 2:11-CV LR.H-RJJ 01/25/2013
Deposition of: Armando Quintanilla Case: :-CV-0-LR.H-RJJ Date: 0//0 OAS REPORTING SERVICES 0 Regatta Drive, Suite 0, Las Vegas, Nevada 0--00 I www.oasisreporting.com I info@oasisreporting.com covyr REpoRTI
More informationRiverbend City: Vang Family Case Study
Riverbend City: Vang Family Case Study Introduction: Welcome to Riverbend City Expository Text: Lu is a young Hmong child who has been exposed to chemicals after a freight train derailment in Riverbend
More informationBreaks During Deposition Before Answering Pending Question (California)
Breaks During Deposition Before Answering Pending Question (California) Sezzers, How do you guys and gals deal with a situation in a deposition where the deponent's lawyer asks for a break before a pending
More informationTo trial attorneys, young and old, and those aspiring to the practice of trial law, cross-examination is
How to Achieve Great Cross-Examinations By: Victor D. Vital To trial attorneys, young and old, and those aspiring to the practice of trial law, cross-examination is considered a valuable skill and a sacred
More information[6/15/2011] Donald Trump June 15, 2011
2 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3 COUNTY OF NEW YORK 4 Index No. 60349/08 5 --------------------------------------x 6 ALM UNLIMITED, INC., as 7 successor-in-interest to 8 ALM INTERNATIONAL CORP.,
More informationFor more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at American English Idioms.
101 American English Idioms (flee in a hurry) Poor Rich has always had his problems with the police. When he found out that they were after him again, he had to take it on the lamb. In order to avoid being
More informationDEPOSITIONS. J. Alexander Tanford, 2001 I. PRELIMINARY MATTERS II. TAKING A DEPOSITION
DEPOSITIONS J. Alexander Tanford, 2001 I. PRELIMINARY MATTERS A. WHOM DO YOU DEPOSE?! The adverse party! The important adverse witnesses if you have time and money to do so! Your own witnesses only if
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FLOYD COUNTY ROME,... GEORG IA FELONY JURY TRIAL PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT DR. PAUL STEFFIS' TESTIMONY PAGES 1-48
THE STTE OF GEORGI, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FLOYD COUNTY ROME,... GEORG I Plaintiff vs ) TIMOTHY MRK FREE, 0-CR-0-JFLWJM CERTIFIED COPY Defendant FELONY JURY TRIL PRTIL TRNSCRIPT DR. PUL STEFFIS' TESTIMONY
More information2 DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL ) BEFORE THE INDEPENDENT DISTRICT, ) 3 Petitioner ) HEARING EXAMINER ) 4 VS. ) FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, ) 5 ARDIS McCANN )
1 NO. 052-LH-0207 Page 1 2 DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL ) BEFORE THE INDEPENDENT DISTRICT, ) 3 Petitioner ) HEARING EXAMINER ) 4 VS. ) FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, ) 5 ARDIS McCANN ) Respondent ) FREDERICK AHRENS
More informationCarl Wiser (Songfacts): We got an with some great pictures from the '70s of the Bella Vista.
http://www.songfacts.com/blog/interviews/pegi_young/ Pegi Young has been married to Neil Young since 1978. Their son Ben has cerebral palsy, and Pegi spent many years helping to establish the Bridge School,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK i COUNTY OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, EXAMINATION BEFORE TRIAL of PETER J. BALZANO, the
I 1 L SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK i COUNTY OF NEW YORK VERTICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, INC., - -x Plaintiff, -against- PETER J. BALZANO, Defendant. July 26, 2017 10:11 a~m. Index No. 650808/2017
More informationTHE BENCH PRODUCTION HISTORY
THE BENCH CONTACT INFORMATION Paula Fell (310) 497-6684 paulafell@cox.net 3520 Fifth Avenue Corona del Mar, CA 92625 BIOGRAPHY My experience in the theatre includes playwriting, acting, and producing.
More information4, 0 3>.. ss# 21 CJ 'j
Police Department Baltimore, Maryland CI/209 Case Number INFORMATION SHEET V JP \ I 0 cd co- Nickname (.c:(lj Race----'\dL...!-_ Sex F Age 2\ D.O.B.?>IroJ'7 Height 5"' \ Cl Weight 2."6 J - - 4, 0 3>..
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE Defendant. /
180 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL,, vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Plaintiffs, Defendant.
More information