SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRACTICE. LYNNE LIBERATO Haynes and Boone, LLP Houston, Texas
|
|
- Damon Fisher
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRACTICE LYNNE LIBERATO Haynes and Boone, LLP Houston, Texas To access the full materials please go to: State Bar of Texas 33 rd ANNUAL ADVANCED CIVIL TRIAL COURSE July 21-23, 2010 San Antonio August 25-27, 2010 Dallas October 20-22, 2010 Houston CHAPTER 7 See Judge David Hittner & Lynne Liberato, Summary Judgments in Texas: State and Federal Practice, 46 Hous. L. Rev (2010). Available at
2 ARTICLE SUMMARY JUDGMENTS IN TEXAS: STATE AND FEDERAL PRACTICE * Judge David Hittner ** Lynne Liberato *** TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PART 1: STATE SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRACTICE I. PROCEDURE A. Motion for Summary Judgment General Requirements and Uses Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment Combined Traditional and No-Evidence Motions for Summary Judgment B. Pleadings Amended Pleadings Unpleaded Claims or Defenses Pleading Deficiencies and Special Exceptions 1396 C. Time for Filing Motion for Summary Judgment * The Authors acknowledge and thank Bryon Allyn Rice, J.D., University of Houston Law Center, 2008; M.B.A., University of Iowa, 2001; and DeBra Edwards of Haynes and Boone, L.L.P, for their assistance in the preparation of this Article. ** United States District Judge, Southern District of Texas. Formerly Judge, 133d District Court of Texas, Houston, Texas; B.S., New York University, 1961; J.D., New York University School of Law, *** Partner, Haynes and Boone, L.L.P., Houston, Texas; B.S., Sam Houston State University, 1974; M.S., Texas A&M Commerce, 1977; J.D., South Texas College of Law, 1980; President, State Bar of Texas,
3 1380 HOUSTON LAW REVIEW [46:5 1. Traditional Summary Judgment No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment 1399 D. Deadlines for Filing Motion for Summary Judgment 1401 E. Deadlines for Response F. Movant s Reply G. Service H. Continuances General Principles Factors Considered in Granting Continuances 1409 I. Hearing J. The Judgment K. Partial Summary Judgments L. Motions for Rehearing M. Sanctions II. SUMMARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE A. General Principles Time for Filing Unfiled Discovery Objections to Evidence Attach Evidence to Motion for/response to Summary Judgment B. Pleadings as Evidence C. Depositions D. Answers to Interrogatories and Requests for Admissions Evidentiary Considerations Deemed Admissions E. Documents Attaching Documents to Summary Judgment Motion and Response Evidentiary Considerations Authentication of Documents Copies Judicial Notice of Court Records F. Affidavits Form of Affidavits Substance of Affidavits Effect of Improper Affidavits Affidavits by Counsel
4 2010] SUMMARY JUDGMENTS IN TEXAS 1381 G. Other Evidence H. Expert and Interested Witness Testimony Expert Opinion Testimony Nonexpert, Interested Witness Testimony III. BURDEN OF PROOF FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTS A. Traditional Summary Judgments Defendant as Movant Plaintiff as Movant on Affirmative Claims Affirmative Defenses Counterclaims B. No-Evidence Summary Judgments Reasonable Juror Test Applied to No-Evidence Summary Judgments Historical Development C. Both Parties as Movants IV. RESPONDING TO AND OPPOSING A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT A. Responding: General Principles B. Responding to a Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment C. Responding to a No-Evidence Summary Judgment Motion D. Inadequate Responses V. APPEALING SUMMARY JUDGMENTS A. Exception: Both Parties File Motions for Summary Judgment B. Exception: Government Immunity; Media Defendants C. Exception: Permissive Appeal D. Likelihood of Reversal E. Finality of Judgment F. Standard of Review G. Appellate Record H. Appellate Briefs I. Judgment on Appeal J. Bills of Review VI. ATTORNEY S FEES A. Fixed Percentage Fees B. Reasonable Percentage Fees
5 1382 HOUSTON LAW REVIEW [46:5 VII. TYPES OF CASES AMENABLE TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT A. Sworn Accounts Requirements for Petition Answer/Denial Summary Judgment B. Suits on Written Instruments Application of the Parol Evidence Rule Exception to the Parol Evidence Rule C. Statute of Limitations/Statutes of Repose D. Res Judicata/Collateral Estoppel E. Equitable Actions F. Medical Malpractice Negation of Elements of Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations G. Defamation Actions Applicable Law Questions of Law Plaintiff s Burden of Showing Actual Malice Qualified Privilege H. Governmental Immunity I. Family Law Cases Enforceability of Premarital and Marital Property Agreements Interpretation of Divorce Decrees Interpretation or Application of Law Res Judicata/Collateral Estoppel Characterization of Property Existence of the Marital Relationship PART 2: FEDERAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRACTICE I. PROCEDURE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTS A. Timing B. Notice and Hearing C. Deadline to Respond D. Discovery II. STANDARDS OF PROOF FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS A. When the Movant Bears the Burden of Proof
6 2010] SUMMARY JUDGMENTS IN TEXAS 1383 B. When the Movant Does Not Bear the Burden of Proof Movant s Initial Burden Respondent s Burden III. RESPONDING TO THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION A. Supreme Court Precedent B. Items in Response IV. SUMMARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE A. Declarations and Affidavits B. Documents C. Discovery Products D. Pleadings E. Expert Testimony F. Objections to Evidence V. RULE 12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS TREATED AS RULE 56 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT VI. APPEALING SUMMARY JUDGMENTS A. When Summary Judgments Are Appealable B. Standard of Review on Appeal C. The District Court s Order on Summary Judgment 1542 CONCLUSION
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-353 JAMES C. BROWN, IV VERSUS ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. ************ APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RAPIDES,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALSCHULER Vincent K. Yip (No. ) vyip@agsk.com Terry D. Garnett (No. ) tgarnett@agsk.com Peter J. Wied (No. ) pwied@agsk.com Maxwell A. Fox (No. 000) mfox@agsk.com The Water Garden 0 th Street Fourth Floor,
More informationAdvantages of a Deposition
Advantages of a Deposition You can ask specific follow up questions based on the answers you get You give the deponent less time to frame an answer, thus often making it less misleading You can ask a deponent
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case 3:11-cv-00719-RBD-JRK Case: 14-1612 Document: 106 555 Filed Page: 10/02/15 1 Filed: Page 10/02/2015 1 of 7 PageID 26337 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for
More informationA Finding Aid to the Barbara Mathes Gallery Records Pertaining to Rio Nero Lawsuit, , in the Archives of American Art
A Finding Aid to the Barbara Mathes Gallery Records Pertaining to Rio Nero Lawsuit, 1989-1995, in the Archives of American Art Carla De Luise April 02, 2007 Archives of American Art 750 9th Street, NW
More informationKEEPING CONTROL AT DEPOSITION:
KEEPING CONTROL AT DEPOSITION: A FEW TIPS By Paul Scoptur Why We Take Depositions We take depositions for a variety of reasons: to gather facts, evaluate a witness, pin down opinions, and to get sound
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Piester v. Escobar, 2015 IL App (3d) 140457 Appellate Court Caption SEANTAE PIESTER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. SANJUANA ESCOBAR, Respondent-Appellant. District &
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Case 6:14-cv-00687-PGB-KRS Document 220 Filed 10/02/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID 8353 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION PARKERVISION, INC., ) Plaintiff, ) v. Case No. 6:14-cv-687-PGB-KRS
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 10, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D15-1139 Lower Tribunal No. 12-8650 Richard Effs, Appellant,
More informationDEPOSITIONS. J. Alexander Tanford, 2001 I. PRELIMINARY MATTERS II. TAKING A DEPOSITION
DEPOSITIONS J. Alexander Tanford, 2001 I. PRELIMINARY MATTERS A. WHOM DO YOU DEPOSE?! The adverse party! The important adverse witnesses if you have time and money to do so! Your own witnesses only if
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiffs Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Fox 21, Inc. Deadline SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 0//0 0: AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariscal,Deputy Clerk 0 0 DANIEL M. PETROCELLI (S.B.
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-05280 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 Marie Marrero, In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division plaintiff, v Fraternal
More informationNorth Carolina Court of Appeals
North Carolina Court of Appeals Docket Sheet State v Walker Case Number: P15-152 As of: 04/28/2018 Case Closed: Yes Close Date: Case Type: Criminal (Crim_othr) Mediation: No STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA V.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF COLORADO Office of the Chief Justice DIRECTIVE CONCERNING COURT APPOINTMENTS OF DECISION-MAKERS PURSUANT TO , C.R.S.
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO Office of the Chief Justice DIRECTIVE CONCERNING COURT APPOINTMENTS OF DECISION-MAKERS PURSUANT TO 14-10-128.3, C.R.S. I. INTRODUCTION This directive is adopted to assist the
More informationAn Advocate s Craft: Honing Your Technology Skills for Modern Litigation
Joint CLE Conference 2016 An Advocate s Craft: Honing Your Technology Skills for Modern Litigation Timothy James Ting, Assistant Public Defender, Jackson Co., IL An Advocate s Craft: Honing Your Technology
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
LOEB & LOEB LLP BARRY E. MALLEN (SBN 00 bmallen@loeb.com ERIC SCHWARTZ (SBN eschwartz@loeb.com 0 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone:..000 Facsimile:..00 Attorneys for Plaintiff Red
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Lindsley v. TRT Holdings, Inc. et al Doc. 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SARAH LINDSLEY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-2942-B TRT HOLDINGS, INC. AND
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, Case No.: vs. INTELLIFLIX,
More informationCase 1:10-cv LFG-RLP Document 1 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:10-cv-00433-LFG-RLP Document 1 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO FRONT ROW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. No. 1:10-cv-00433 MAJOR
More informationFord v. Panasonic Corp
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-1-2008 Ford v. Panasonic Corp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-2513 Follow this and
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 12-55234 06/06/2014 ID: 9122254 DktEntry: 46-1 Page: 1 of 19 (1 of 24) FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN SINIBALDI and NICOLLE DISIMONE, individually and on
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Strafford, ss Judicial Branch Superior Court No. -0-CV-00 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * LINDA-MARIE NAKAMURA -v- MICHAEL GILL AND MORTGAGE SPECIALISTS, INC. * * * * * * * *
More informationCourtroom Evidence Presentation System
Hall Research Technologies, Inc 1163 Warner Ave. Tustin, CA 92780 Phone: (714) 641-6607 Fax: (714) 641-6698 Courtroom Evidence Presentation System Prepared for: United States District Court, Spokane, WA.
More informationCase5:14-cv HRL Document1 Filed01/15/14 Page1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case5:14-cv-04528-HRL Document1 Filed01/15/14 Page1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RED PINE POINT LLC, v. Plaintiff, AMAZON.COM, INC. AND
More informationdismiss? Most of my reading of case law involves Westlaw, which obviously
Graphics Inside of a Motion to Dismiss? Team - What are your thoughts on putting flow charts inside of a motion to dismiss? Most of my reading of case law involves Westlaw, which obviously is graphics
More informationCase 3:16-cv K Document 36 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID 233
Case 3:16-cv-00382-K Document 36 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID 233 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JOHN BERMAN, v. Plaintiff, DIRECTV, LLC and
More informationTRIAL TALK COLORADO TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION. October/November Years on the Side of People Volume 57 Issue 6
TRIAL TALK COLORADO TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION October/November 2008 54 Years on the Side of People Volume 57 Issue 6 A Radically New Approach to the Taking of the Deposition of the Defendant in an Auto
More informationSHEPARD S CITATIONS. How to. Shepardize. Your guide to legal research using. Shepard s. Citations: in print. It s how you know
SHEPARD S CITATIONS How to Shepardize Your guide to legal research using Shepard s Citations: in print It s how you know How to Shepardize Using Shepard s in Print Section 3 Using Shepard s in Print Differences
More informationPatent Reissue. Devan Padmanabhan. Partner Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Patent Reissue Devan Padmanabhan Partner Dorsey & Whitney, LLP Patent Correction A patent may be corrected in four ways Reissue Certificate of correction Disclaimer Reexamination Roadmap Reissue Rules
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Arnold B, Calmann (abc@saiber.com) Jakob B. Halpern (jbh~saiber.com) SAIBER LLC One Gateway Center, 13th Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 622-3333 Kevin P.B. Johnson (kevin] ohnson~quirmemanuel.corn)
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/25/ :35 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/25/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------- )( ESRT EMPIRE STATE BUILDING, L.L.C., Plaintiff, IndeJC No. 656145/2016 (Lebovits,
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:18-cv-05800 Document 1 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY,
More informationBreaks During Deposition Before Answering Pending Question (California)
Breaks During Deposition Before Answering Pending Question (California) Sezzers, How do you guys and gals deal with a situation in a deposition where the deponent's lawyer asks for a break before a pending
More informationJ. Scott Colesanti SSRN Author #
J. Scott Colesanti SSRN Author #1196766 EDUCATION: New York University School of Law LL.M. in Corporate Law, May 1997 TEACHING EXPERIENCE: Fordham University School of Law J.D., May 1988 Notes & Comments
More informationP R O C E E D I N G S ; and the accompanying case on bond is Both sides ready to proceed? MS. TURNER: State's ready.
0 P R O C E E D I N G S THE COURT: This is Cause No., ; and the accompanying case on bond is. Both sides ready to proceed? MR. LEWIS: We are ready, Your Honor. MS. TURNER: State's ready. THE COURT: Folks
More informationRegulation No. 6 Peer Review
Regulation No. 6 Peer Review Effective May 10, 2018 Copyright 2018 Appraisal Institute. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored
More informationBooks for your desk, and your desktop. TexasBarBooks Catalog. FREE ground shipping 30-day money-back guarantee Additional licenses available
TexasBarBooks 2009 Catalog Books for your desk, and your desktop. FREE ground shipping 30-day money-back guarantee Additional licenses available For more information about our publications, visit www.texasbarbooks.com.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI SHERWOOD DWAYNE BROWN. v. CAUSE NO CA SCT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Jul 3 2014 16:44:16 2013-CA-01130-SCT Pages: 23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI SHERWOOD DWAYNE BROWN Appellant v. CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01130-SCT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Appellee APPEAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE TERRY BROWN V. ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND WILLIAM BONNELL COMPANY, INC. Direct Appeal from
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-2354 JAY STARKWEATHER, v. Petitioner-Appellant, JUDY P. SMITH, WARDEN, OSHKOSH CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal
More informationAtticus Finch, Perry Mason and Michael Clayton Have Nothing on the Legal Profession s Favorite Attorney: Vinny
A-HED By Jacob Gershman March 13, 2017 Atticus Finch, Perry Mason and Michael Clayton Have Nothing on the Legal Profession s Favorite Attorney: Vinny The 1992 comedy My Cousin Vinny, with its smart-aleck
More informationCourt Filings 2000 Trial
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU 19952002 Court Filings 2000 Trial 142000 Jury Questionnaire Terry H. Gilbert Attorney for Sheppard Estate George H. Carr Attorney for Sheppard Estate How
More informationHolding. The judgment in the second instance shall be reversed. This case shall be remanded to the Intellectual Property High Court.
[Translation] * Holding The judgment in the second instance shall be reversed. This case shall be remanded to the Intellectual Property High Court. Grounds Regarding reasons for petition for acceptance
More informationDo's, Dont's, and Maybes: Legal Writing Punctuation Part I
Fordham University School of Law From the SelectedWorks of Hon. Gerald Lebovits May, 2008 Do's, Dont's, and Maybes: Legal Writing Punctuation Part I Gerald Lebovits Available at: https://works.bepress.com/gerald_lebovits/231/
More informationDEPARTMENTAL GENERAL ORDER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY January 8, 2003 MERCER ISLAND POLICE
DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL ORDER 91-2 R-9 (Revised) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY January 8, 2003 MERCER ISLAND POLICE Index as: Audio and Video Recording Camera, Video Equipment Use Photography, Audio/Video Use
More information[3/24/2011] George Ross March 24, 2011
2 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK 3 4 ALM UNLIMITED, INC., as successor-in-interest to ALM INTERNATIONAL 5 CORP., 6 Plaintiff, 7 -against- 8 DONALD J. TRUMP, 9 Defendant. 0 Index
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, v. DALI WIRELESS, INC., Plaintiff, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:16-cv-477 Jury Trial Demanded
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT )))))))))))) Appeal No (Case No. 07-C-513 (E.D. Wis.
JAY STARKWEATHER, v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT )))))))))))) Appeal No. 08-2354 (Case No. 07-C-513 (E.D. Wis.)) )))))))))))) Petitioner-Appellant, JUDY P. SMITH, Warden, Oshkosh
More informationthejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com
Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 DAVID FORD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY L. RAY, p/k/a SIR MIX-A-LOT, Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR
More informationThis Chapter does not apply to applications and decisions on, development on land reserved in corridor maps.
1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387
Federal Communications Commission Approved by OMB Washington, D.C. 20554 3060-1105 INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387 DTV TRANSITION STATUS REPORT GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS A. FCC Form 387 is to be used by all licensees/permittees
More informationWINNING YOUR CASE THROUGH EFFECTIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY
WINNING YOUR CASE THROUGH EFFECTIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY HONORABLE PAUL C. HUCK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ZOË TELLMAN, DICKSON GEESMAN LLP, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA GARY LAFAYETTE, LAFAYETTE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE Defendant. /
180 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL,, vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Plaintiffs, Defendant.
More informationFOR PUBLIC VIEWING ONLY INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387 DTV TRANSITION STATUS REPORT. All previous editions obsolete. transition. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
Federal Communications Commission Approved by OMB Washington, D.C. 20554 3060-1105 INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387 DTV TRANSITION STATUS REPORT GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS transition. A. FCC Form 387 must be filed no
More informationFALLS CABLE ACCESS CORPORATION CABLE ACCESS CHANNEL 14 Policies & Procedures Manual
FALLS CABLE ACCESS CORPORATION CABLE ACCESS CHANNEL 14 Policies & Procedures Manual Overview: Use of the Falls Cable Access Studio is considered a democratic right of responsible Menomonee Falls citizens.
More informationWrite the Cites Right Part I
Fordham University School of Law From the SelectedWorks of Hon. Gerald Lebovits October, 2004 Write the Cites Right Part I Gerald Lebovits Available at: https://works.bepress.com/gerald_lebovits/30/ NEW
More informationREPORTER'S RECORD TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO DCV-0235-B
THERESA GAMEZ, PLAINTIFF V. REPORTER'S RECORD TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 0-DCV-0-B DILLON TRANSPORT, INC.; DILLON TRANSPORT, INC., IN ITS COMMON OR ASSUMED NAME; KENNETH EUGENE JENNINGS AND MIGUEL A. GARCIA,
More informationCase 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP David E. Sipiora (State Bar No. ) dsipiora@kilpatricktownsend.com Kristopher L. Reed (State Bar No. ) kreed@kilpatricktownsend.com
More informationCELL TOWER VICTORIES by Michael Cherry, Edward J. Imwinkelried, Manfred Schenk, Aaron Romano, Naomi Fetterman, Nicole Hardin and Arnie Beckman.
CELL TOWER VICTORIES by Michael Cherry, Edward J. Imwinkelried, Manfred Schenk, Aaron Romano, Naomi Fetterman, Nicole Hardin and Arnie Beckman. For years, many prosecutors have convinced jurors that the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D January 5, 2010 No. 09-70012 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk SUZANNE MARGARET BASSO v. Petitioner-Appellant
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Present: The Honorable CHRISTINA A. SNYDER Catherine Jeang Laura Elias N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Proceedings: Michael Kahn Daniel Blakey I. INTRODUCTION
More informationLegality of Electronically Stored Images
Legality of Electronically Stored Images Acordex's imaging system design and user procedures are important in supporting legal admissibility of document images as business records or as evidence. Acordex
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 556 U. S. (2009) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 07 582 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit VIRGINIA INNOVATION SCIENCES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
More informationDIRECT EXAMINATION. Q. Go ahead and state and spell your name for the. A. Rick Chambers, R-I-C-K C-H-A-M-B-E-R-S.
1 [Counsel confer.] MS. SHEIN: Your Honor, that s all we have for this witness. MR. MALCOLM: Nothing further for this witness, Your Honor. THE COURT: Can this witness be excused? MS. SHEIN: Yes, he can.
More informationEffective Use of Quotations By Angela Kershner, Legal Writing Fellow,
Effective Use of Quotations By Angela Kershner, Legal Writing Fellow, 2017-2018 Reference to primary sources is important in all types of legal writing. Facts, rules, and holdings from these sources must
More informationMs. Finger ELA
Ms. Finger ELA 2018-2019 Name: Block: Vocabulary Test (Formal): November 16th Entire Packet Due (Formal): November 30th Bio Poem Due (Formal): December 14th Monster By: Walter Dean Myers The film will
More informationQ. But in reality, the bond had already been. revoked, hadn't it? It was already set at zero bond. before September 21st, specifically on September --
0 0 September st, correct? Q. But in reality, the bond had already been revoked, hadn't it? It was already set at zero bond before September st, specifically on September -- A. The bond was revoked on
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Case 1:16-cv-10992 Document 1 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PHILIPS LIGHTING NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and PHILIPS LIGHTING HOLDING B.V.,
More informationCase 1:08-cv DC Document Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 27 EXHIBIT A
Case 1:08-cv-07104-DC Document 1077-1 Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 27 EXHIBIT A Case 1:08-cv-07104-DC Document 1077-1 Filed 01/07/15 Page 2 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
More informationQ. That's all from the OC spray, right? MR. SCOTT: Okay. Pass the. THE COURT: State? MR. SCOTT: Yes, Your Honor. State, call your next.
Q. That's all from the OC spray, right? A. That's correct. MR. SCOTT: Okay. Pass the witness, Your Honor. THE COURT: State? MR. GILLIAM: Nothing further, Your Honor. THE COURT: May he be excused? MR. SCOTT:
More informationCase 2:16-cv MRH Document 18 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:16-cv-01594-MRH Document 18 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MINELAB ELECTRONICS PTY LTD, v. Plaintiff, XP METAL DETECTORS
More informationLegal Research Refresher: Secondary Authority Guide
Legal Research Refresher: Secondary Authority Guide All legal authority that does not come from one of the three branches of government legislative, executive, and judicial is secondary authority. Secondary
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0066p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT MEDIACOM SOUTHEAST LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BELLSOUTH
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL. - and - NOTICE OF MOTION (Motion for Leave to Appeal)
Court File No. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL B E T W E E N: BELL CANADA and BELL MEDIA INC. Applicants - and - ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent NOTICE OF MOTION (Motion for Leave to Appeal) TAKE NOTICE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION MICROSOFT CORP., ET AL., v. COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL
More information1980s Music: It Was More Than Disco Boogie There Was Just Something Subliminal About It. Jessica Malinski
1980s Music: It Was More Than Disco Boogie There Was Just Something Subliminal About It Course: Communications 453 Instructor: Dr. Joseph Mirando Assignment: Research Paper Jessica Malinski Now, more than
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1 Patrick J. Cerillo, Esq. Patrick J. Cerillo, LLC 4 Walter Foran Blvd., Suite 402 Flemington, NJ 08822 Attorney ID No: 01481-1980
More informationBroken Arrow woman gets life sentence in shooting death
Page 1 of 6 Get unlimited digital access to tulsaworld.com so when news breaks, you know the facts Broken Arrow woman gets life sentence in shooting death of ex-husband Broken Arrow woman sentenced in
More informationCase3:08-cv JW Document279-2 Filed07/02/12 Page1 of 10. Exhibit B
Case:0-cv-0-JW Document- Filed0/0/ Page of 0 Exhibit B Case:0-cv-0-JW Case:0-cv-00-JW Document- Document0 Filed0// Filed0/0/ Page Page of 0 0 John L. Cooper (State Bar No. 00) jcooper@fbm.com Nan Joesten
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Case 117-cv-00363 Document 1 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 16 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs (pro hac vice motion forthcoming) Roman Swoopes (pro hac vice motion forthcoming) 425 Market Street San
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:11-cv-02964-TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION BARCO, N.V. and ) BARCO, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, )
More informationTrademark Infringement: No Royalties for K-Tel's False Kingsmen
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Law Reviews 1-1-1986 Trademark Infringement:
More informationSELLE V. GIBB AND THE FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF PLAGIARISM. M. Fletcher Reynolds Copyright 1993
SELLE V. GIBB AND THE FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF PLAGIARISM M. Fletcher Reynolds Copyright 1993 Ronald H. Selle, an Illinois antique dealer with a master's degree in music education, composed popular and religious
More informationLeibowitz, et al. ORGANIZATION bill analysis 5/13/2009 (CSHB 821 by Hancock) Creating a TV manufacturer based TV recycling program
HOUSE HB 821 RESEARCH Leibowitz, et al. ORGANIZATION bill analysis 5/13/2009 (CSHB 821 by Hancock) SUBJECT: COMMITTEE: VOTE: Creating a TV manufacturer based TV recycling program Environmental Regulation
More informationUNDERSTANDING TO ERADICATE HANDBOOK FOR UNDERSTANDING CORRUPTION CRIMES
UNDERSTANDING TO ERADICATE HANDBOOK FOR UNDERSTANDING CORRUPTION CRIMES THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMITTEE THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA UNDERSTANDING TO ERADICATE Handbook for Understanding Corruption Crimes
More informationBUS TOUR AUDITION INFORMATION
SEASON XV BUS TOUR AUDITION INFORMATION ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS You must be able to prove to American Idol Productions, Inc. ( Producer ) as of June 1, 2015: You are a U.S. citizen or a permanent legal
More informationAraceli Cabral appeals the validity of the promotional examination for Financial Examiner 1 (PS8038L), Department of Banking and Insurance.
In the Matter of Araceli Cabral, Financial Examiner 1 (PS8038L), Department of Banking and Insurance DOP Docket No. 2004-2568 (Merit System Board, decided August 11, 2004) Araceli Cabral appeals the validity
More informationThe NBCU Comcast Joint Venture
The NBCU Comcast Joint Venture On December 3, 2009, Comcast and General Electric (GE) announced their intention to merge GE s subsidiary NBC Universal (NBCU) with Comcast's cable networks, regional sports
More informationThe NBCU-Comcast Joint Venture
The NBCU-Comcast Joint Venture On December 3, 2009, Comcast and General Electric (GE) announced their intention to merge GE s subsidiary NBC Universal (NBCU) with Comcast's cable networks, regional sports
More informationMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW ADVOCACY SPRING PROBLEM 2019 JOINT APPENDIX
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW ADVOCACY SPRING PROBLEM 01 JOINT APPENDIX This document contains all the facts students enrolled in Advocacy for the Spring Semester of 01 at Michigan State University
More informationLUVERNE PUBLIC ACCESS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
LUVERNE PUBLIC ACCESS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Contents 1. Intent of Public Access Policies & Procedures... 1 2. Definitions... 1 A. City... 1 B. Community Access Channels... 1 C. Community Producer...
More informationCarl Lobitz. San Antonio Criminal Defense Lawyer. Recent Sampling of Criminal Case Results (Latest Results Near Bottom)
Carl Lobitz San Antonio Criminal Defense Lawyer Recent Sampling of Criminal Case Results (Latest Results Near Bottom) Disclaimer: Every case is different. Your results may vary from those mentioned here.
More informationAMENDED MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE BRINGING OF A CLASS ACTION AND TO ASCRIBE THE STATUS OF REPRESENTATIVE (Art C.C.P.
C A N A D A PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL S U P E R I O R C O U R T (Class action) No : 500-06-000491-098 E. BEN-ELI Petitioner -vs- TOSHIBA OF CANADA LIMITED, legal person duly constituted,
More informationArticles in the Source should aim to be under 5000 words (about 16 pages double-spaced) with or fewer footnotes, or only as needed.
To: Antitrust Source Authors and Editors From: Tina Miller (with thanks to Tammy Feldman) Date: Sept. 1, 2016 Re: Antitrust Source Top Ten Formatting and Style Checklist 1. Antitrust Source Style: General
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment to the Commission s Rules ) MB Docket No. 15-53 Concerning Effective Competition ) ) Implementation of
More informationADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY
Doc. B/35 13 March 06 ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY One of the core functions and activities of the ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. ( ATSC ) is the development
More information1. At all relevant times, Richard S. McKirurey was the holder of North Carolina
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF PHARMACY IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD S. MCKINNEY License No. 6370 ) ) ) ) ORDER OF DISCIPLINE THIS MATTER came on to be considered at hearing before the North
More informationNotification No: PSC/Exam/2017/44 Dated:
Page 1 of 33 Subject : Revised Result of Combined Competitive (Preliminary) Examination 2016. Notification No: PSC/Exam/2017/44 Dated: 09.08.2017 Whereas General Administration Department (GAD) Vide Communication
More informationCHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES CHART
CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES CHART Combined 650.00 74 75 75 76 77 78 700.00 119 120 121 123 124 125 750.00 164 166 167 169 171 173 800.00 190 211 213 216 218 220 850.00 202 257 259 262 265 268 900.00 213 302
More information