UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
- Hortense Ferguson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ALSCHULER Vincent K. Yip (No. ) vyip@agsk.com Terry D. Garnett (No. ) tgarnett@agsk.com Peter J. Wied (No. ) pwied@agsk.com Maxwell A. Fox (No. 000) mfox@agsk.com The Water Garden 0 th Street Fourth Floor, North Tower Santa Monica, CA Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant BENQ AMERICA CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALSCHULER 0 SHARP CORPORATION a.k.a. SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA, vs. Plaintiff, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, VIEWSONIC CORPORATION, BENQ CORPORATION, BENQ AMERICA, ENVISION PERIPHERALS INC. d/b/a AOC MONITORS, PROVIEW TECHNOLOGY, INC., SCEPTRE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ACER, INC., AND ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. CASE NO. C0-0 MMC (JCS) FIRST AMENDED ANSWER OF BENQ AMERICA CORPORATION TO SHARP CORPORATION S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case No. C 0-0 MMC (JCS)
2 0 Defendant BENQ AMERICA CORPORATION (hereinafter BENQ AMERICA ) hereby answers and asserts its affirmative defenses to the First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement filed by Sharp Corporation on February, 00 (hereinafter Complaint ) as follows: THE PARTIES. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. Upon information and belief, BENQ is a corporation existing under the laws of Taiwan having a place of business located at Shan-Ying Road, Gueishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan, R.O.C. Upon information and belief, BENQ offers for sale and sells products, including monitors, in the United States. Upon information and belief, some of the monitors may incorporate LCD products manufactured by AU Optronics ( AUO ). BENQ AMERICA otherwise denies the remaining allegations in paragraph.. BENQ AMERICA admits that it is a corporation existing under the laws of the state of California having a place of business located at 00 East Business Parkway, City of Industry, California. BENQ AMERICA further admits that it imports, offers for sale, and sells products, including monitors, in the United States. Upon information and belief, some of the monitors may incorporate LCD products manufactured by AU Optronics ( AUO ). BENQ AMERICA otherwise denies the remaining allegations in paragraph.. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form Case No. C 0-0 MMC (JCS)
3 0 a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. Admitted.. Admitted. JURISDICTION. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. Upon information and belief, BENQ solicits sales and sells products, including monitors, in the United States, including within the Northern District of California. BENQ AMERICA denies the remaining allegations in paragraph.. BENQ AMERICA admits that it imports into the United States, solicits sales, and sells products, including monitors, in the United States, including within the Northern District of California. BENQ AMERICA denies the remaining allegations in paragraph.. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and 0. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph 0 and. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and Case No. C 0-0 MMC (JCS)
4 0. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations of paragraph and. Admitted.. Admitted. VENUE INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT ASSERTED PATENTS-IN-SUIT. BENQ AMERICA admits that United States Patent No.,, ( the patent ) appears to be entitled Method of Driving Liquid Crystal Display Device and to have an issue date of March,, and that a copy accompanied the Complaint as Exhibit A. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and. BENQ AMERICA admits that the patent lists Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha as the Assignee. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and. BENQ AMERICA admits that United States Patent No.,0, ( the patent ) appears to be entitled Liquid Crystal Active-Matrix Display Device and to have an issue date of July,, and that a copy accompanied the Complaint as Exhibit B. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and therefore denies them.. BENQ AMERICA admits that the patent lists Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha as the Assignee. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the Case No. C 0-0 MMC (JCS)
5 0 allegations and 0. BENQ AMERICA admits that United States Patent No.,0, ( the patent ) appears to be entitled Liquid Crystal Display Device and to have an issue date of January,, and that a copy accompanied the Complaint as Exhibit C. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph 0, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and. BENQ AMERICA admits that the patent lists Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha as the Assignee. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and. BENQ AMERICA admits that United States Patent No.,, ( the patent ) appears to be entitled Liquid Crystal Display Element and Method for Treating Defective Pixels Therein and to have an issue date of August,, and that a copy accompanied the Complaint as Exhibit D. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and. BENQ AMERICA admits that the patent lists Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha as the Assignee. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and. BENQ AMERICA admits that United States Patent No.,, ( the patent ) appears to be entitled Lighting Apparatus and to have an issue date of March,, and that a copy accompanied the Complaint as Exhibit E. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and. BENQ AMERICA admits that the patent lists Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha as the Assignee. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the Case No. C 0-0 MMC (JCS)
6 0 allegations and First Claim for Relief INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.,,. BENQ AMERICA hereby incorporates by reference, as appropriate, its responses to paragraphs through.. BENQ AMERICA admits that it imports, offers for sale, and sells monitors in the United States, certain of which, upon information and belief, may comprise LCD products manufactured by AUO, and denies the remaining allegations regarding BENQ AMERICA in paragraph. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and. BENQ AMERICA denies each and every allegation of paragraph.. BENQ AMERICA denies each and every allegation of paragraph. Second Claim for Relief INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.,0, 0. BENQ AMERICA hereby incorporates by reference, as appropriate, its responses to paragraphs through.. BENQ AMERICA admits that it imports, offers for sale, and sells monitors in the United States, certain of which, upon information and belief, may comprise LCD products manufactured by AUO, and denies the remaining allegations regarding BENQ AMERICA in paragraph. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and. BENQ AMERICA denies each and every allegation of paragraph.. BENQ AMERICA denies each and every allegation of paragraph. Third Claim for Relief INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.,0,. BENQ AMERICA hereby incorporates by reference, as appropriate, its Case No. C 0-0 MMC (JCS)
7 0 responses to paragraphs through.. BENQ AMERICA admits that it imports, offers for sale, and sells monitors in the United States, certain of which, upon information and belief, may comprise LCD products manufactured by AUO, and denies the remaining allegations regarding BENQ AMERICA in paragraph. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and. BENQ AMERICA denies each and every allegation of paragraph.. BENQ AMERICA denies each and every allegation of paragraph. Fourth Claim for Relief INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.,,. BENQ AMERICA hereby incorporates by reference, as appropriate, its responses to paragraphs through.. BENQ AMERICA admits that it imports, offers for sale, and sells monitors in the United States, certain of which, upon information and belief, may comprise LCD products manufactured by AUO, and denies the remaining allegations regarding BENQ AMERICA in paragraph. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and 0. BENQ AMERICA denies each and every allegation of paragraph 0.. BENQ AMERICA denies each and every allegation of paragraph. Fifth Claim for Relief INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.,,. BENQ AMERICA hereby incorporates by reference, as appropriate, its responses to paragraphs through.. BENQ AMERICA admits that it imports, offers for sale, and sells monitors in the United States, certain of which, upon information and belief, may comprise LCD products manufactured by AUO, and denies the remaining allegations regarding BENQ AMERICA in Case No. C 0-0 MMC (JCS)
8 0 paragraph. As to any remaining allegations contained in paragraph, BENQ AMERICA is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and. BENQ AMERICA denies each and every allegation of paragraph.. BENQ AMERICA denies each and every allegation of paragraph. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Without conceding that any of the following necessarily must be pleaded as an affirmative defense, or that any of the following is not already at issue by virtue of the foregoing denials, and without prejudice to BENQ AMERICA s right to plead additional defenses as discovery into the facts of the matter warrant, BENQ AMERICA hereby asserts the following affirmative defenses: First Affirmative Defense. BENQ AMERICA does not infringe and has not infringed (either directly, contributorily, or by inducement) any valid and enforceable claim of the,,,, and patents, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. Second Affirmative Defense. The asserted claims of the,,,, and patents are invalid for failure to comply with one or more of the requirements of Title, U.S. Code, at least in Sections,, and. of laches. of estoppel. Third Affirmative Defense. Sharp s claims and requested remedies are barred by the equitable doctrine Fourth Affirmative Defense. Sharp s claims and requested remedies are barred by the equitable doctrine Fifth Affirmative Defense 0. The patent is unenforceable at least because Sharp knowingly failed to disclose to the United States Patent and Trademark Office U.S. Patent Nos.,,,,,0, Case No. C 0-0 MMC (JCS)
9 0,0,, and,, and Japanese laid open patent publication No. 00. These references issued or were published during the pendency of the application that issued as the patent. Sharp knew, or should have know, of these references as they are assigned to Sharp and had some inventors in common with the patent. These references are material to the patent and were withheld with the intent to mislead the United States Patent and Trademark Office. PRAYERS FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, BENQ AMERICA respectfully requests that the Court: A. Dismiss the Complaint with prejudice; B. Enter a judgment in favor of BENQ AMERICA; C. Declare that BENQ AMERICA has not infringed and currently is not infringing, whether directly, indirectly, contributorily, by inducement, literally, or under the doctrine of equivalents any claim of the,,,, and patents; D. Declare that the asserted claims of the,,,, and patents are invalid; E. Declare that the asserted claims of the patent are unenforceable. F. Declare that Sharp is entitled to no past damages by virtue of laches; G. Declare that Sharp is entitled to no relief of any type by virtue of estoppel; H. Declare that this is an exceptional case under U.S.C. and award attorneys fees to BENQ AMERICA; and I. Grant such further relief as the Court deems just and proper. ALSCHULER Case No. C 0-0 MMC (JCS)
10 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (b), BENQ AMERICA respectfully demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. 0 DATED: April, 00 ALSCHULER By /s/ Peter J. Wied Peter J. Wied Attorneys for Defendant ALSCHULER Case No. C 0-0 MMC (JCS)
Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP David E. Sipiora (State Bar No. ) dsipiora@kilpatricktownsend.com Kristopher L. Reed (State Bar No. ) kreed@kilpatricktownsend.com
More informationCase 1:10-cv LFG-RLP Document 1 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:10-cv-00433-LFG-RLP Document 1 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO FRONT ROW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. No. 1:10-cv-00433 MAJOR
More informationCase 3:16-cv K Document 36 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID 233
Case 3:16-cv-00382-K Document 36 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID 233 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JOHN BERMAN, v. Plaintiff, DIRECTV, LLC and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1 Patrick J. Cerillo, Esq. Patrick J. Cerillo, LLC 4 Walter Foran Blvd., Suite 402 Flemington, NJ 08822 Attorney ID No: 01481-1980
More informationCase5:14-cv HRL Document1 Filed01/15/14 Page1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case5:14-cv-04528-HRL Document1 Filed01/15/14 Page1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RED PINE POINT LLC, v. Plaintiff, AMAZON.COM, INC. AND
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, v. DALI WIRELESS, INC., Plaintiff, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:16-cv-477 Jury Trial Demanded
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Arnold B, Calmann (abc@saiber.com) Jakob B. Halpern (jbh~saiber.com) SAIBER LLC One Gateway Center, 13th Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 622-3333 Kevin P.B. Johnson (kevin] ohnson~quirmemanuel.corn)
More informationCase 2:16-cv MRH Document 18 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:16-cv-01594-MRH Document 18 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MINELAB ELECTRONICS PTY LTD, v. Plaintiff, XP METAL DETECTORS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:11-cv-02964-TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION BARCO, N.V. and ) BARCO, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, )
More informationCase 1:18-cv RMB-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 44 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:18-cv-10238-RMB-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 44 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TVnGO Ltd. (BVI), Plaintiff, Civil Case No.: 18-cv-10238 v.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Case 1:16-cv-10992 Document 1 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PHILIPS LIGHTING NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and PHILIPS LIGHTING HOLDING B.V.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE P TECH, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff, P Tech, LLC
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-00890-ELR Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SONY CORPORATION and SONY ELECTRONICS INC., v. Plaintiffs,
More informationAttorney for Plaintiff Visual Effect Innovations, LLC
Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: 0-- 0 RYAN E. HATCH (SBN ) LAW OFFICE OF RYAN E. HATCH, PC Work: 0--0 Mobile: 0-- Fax: 0-- Ryan@ryanehatch.com Attorney for Plaintiff Visual Effect
More informationPatent Reissue. Devan Padmanabhan. Partner Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Patent Reissue Devan Padmanabhan Partner Dorsey & Whitney, LLP Patent Correction A patent may be corrected in four ways Reissue Certificate of correction Disclaimer Reexamination Roadmap Reissue Rules
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Case 3:17-cv-01993-G Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CHEETAH OMNI LLC, a Texas limited liability company, Plaintiff,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
LOEB & LOEB LLP BARRY E. MALLEN (SBN 00 bmallen@loeb.com ERIC SCHWARTZ (SBN eschwartz@loeb.com 0 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone:..000 Facsimile:..00 Attorneys for Plaintiff Red
More informationCase 2:17-cv DDP-AGR Document 82 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1742
Case :-cv-0-ddp-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 0) glenn.pomerantz@mto.com ROSE LEDA EHLER (State Bar No. ) rose.ehler@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Case 117-cv-00363 Document 1 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 16 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs (pro hac vice motion forthcoming) Roman Swoopes (pro hac vice motion forthcoming) 425 Market Street San
More informationDeadline.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA COMPLAINT
0 0 LEWIS N. LEVY, Bar No. 0 DANIEL R. BARTH, Bar No. 00 Levy, Ford & Wallach Motor Avenue Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () 0- Email: LLevy@lfwlawyers.com DBarth@lfwlawyers.com JEFFREY
More informationCase 3:18-cv K Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 33 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:18-cv-00508-K Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 33 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD. and SEOUL VIOSYS CO., LTD. v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Stacey H. Wang (SBN ) HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 00 South Hope Street th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00-0 Telephone: --00 Facsimile: --0 stacey.wang@hklaw.com Michael
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 0) glenn.pomerantz@mto.com ROSE LEDA EHLER (State Bar No. ) rose.ehler@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 0 South Grand
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiffs Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Fox 21, Inc. Deadline SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 0//0 0: AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariscal,Deputy Clerk 0 0 DANIEL M. PETROCELLI (S.B.
More informationCase 2:19-cv wks Document 1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
Case 2:19-cv-00008-wks Document 1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 15 CHOOSECO LLC, Plaintiff, V. NETFLIX, INC., Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT U.S. OlSTRlCT COURT 01'STRtCT
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, Case No.: vs. INTELLIFLIX,
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-05280 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 Marie Marrero, In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division plaintiff, v Fraternal
More informationSUMMARY JUDGMENT PRACTICE. LYNNE LIBERATO Haynes and Boone, LLP Houston, Texas
SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRACTICE LYNNE LIBERATO Haynes and Boone, LLP Houston, Texas lynne.liberato@haynesboone.com To access the full materials please go to: http://www.haynesboone.com/summary_judgments_in_texas_2010/
More informationthejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com
Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 DAVID FORD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY L. RAY, p/k/a SIR MIX-A-LOT, Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR
More informationADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY
Doc. B/35 13 March 06 ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY One of the core functions and activities of the ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. ( ATSC ) is the development
More informationCase 3:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 23 Page ID#: 1
Case 3:14-cv-00431 Document 1 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 23 Page ID#: 1 Timothy S. DeJong, OSB No. 940662 Email: tdejong@stollberne.com Jacob S. Gill, OSB No. 033238 Email: jgill@stollberne.com 209 S.W.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 1:16-cv KMM ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
PRISUA ENGINEERING CORP., v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al, Defendants. Case No. 1:16-cv-21761-KMM / ORDER DENYING MOTION
More informationCase 1:15-cv LJA Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Case 1:15-cv-00160-LJA Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Arthur Sheridan, an individual, and Barbara Sheridan, an individual,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Complaint
CASE 0:17-cv-00307 Document 1 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. CLEARFIELD, INC., Plaintiffs, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) )
More informationUnited States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. SPORTVISION, INC, Plaintiff. v. SPORTSMEDIA TECHNOLOGY CORP, Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. SPORTVISION, INC, Plaintiff. v. SPORTSMEDIA TECHNOLOGY CORP, Defendant. No. C 04-03115 JW Feb. 17, 2006. Larry E. Vierra, Burt Magen, Vierra
More informationCase 5:16-cv LS Document 40 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 5:16-cv-00611-LS Document 40 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA APRIL NGUYEN and BRETT BOYER, individually and on behalf of all
More informationThe Jon Vickers Film Scoring Award 2017/2019 Entry Form and Agreement
The Jon Vickers Film Scoring Award 2017/2019 Entry Form and Agreement Name (print): Current Address: Phone Number: Email Address: Date of Entry: The deadline for entries is May 1, 2017. All entries must
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc. Doc. Case :0-cv-0-HRL Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 GILL SPERLEIN ( THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN Castro Street, Suite San Francisco, California Telephone: ( - X
More informationIPPV ENTERPRISES, LLC, and MAAST, Inc, Plaintiffs. v. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORP.; NagraVision, S.A.; and NagraStar, L.L.C, Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Delaware. IPPV ENTERPRISES, LLC, and MAAST, Inc, Plaintiffs. v. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORP.; NagraVision, S.A.; and NagraStar, L.L.C, Defendants. Civ.A. No. 99-577-RRM
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Lindsley v. TRT Holdings, Inc. et al Doc. 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SARAH LINDSLEY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-2942-B TRT HOLDINGS, INC. AND
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. Recitals
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement or Agreement ) is entered into by and between the American Council of the Blind ( ACB ), the Bay State Council
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SYNERON MEDICAL LTD., CANDELA CORPORATION, AND MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL v. Plaintiffs, ILOODA CO., LTD., CUTERA, INC., EMVERA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ARRIS GROUP, INC., ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., and GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, v. Plaintiffs, CONSTELLATION TECHNOLOGIES
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 10, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D15-1139 Lower Tribunal No. 12-8650 Richard Effs, Appellant,
More informationARRIS Solutions Inc. TERMS OF USE ARRIS SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS
ARRIS Solutions Inc. TERMS OF USE ARRIS SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS (Effective as of February 10, 2015) PLEASE READ CAREFULLY This ARRIS Solutions, Inc. Terms of Use Agreement (this "Agreement") is a legal agreement
More informationCLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER FOR UNITED STATES PATENT NUMBER 5,283,819
United States District Court, S.D. California. HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P, Plaintiff. v. GATEWAY, INC, Defendant. Gateway, Inc, Counterclaim-Plaintiff. v. Hewlett-Packard Development Company
More informationPaper 21 Tel: Entered: July 14, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 21 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: July 14, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD EIZO CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. BARCO N.V., Patent
More informationCase 1:08-cv DC Document Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 27 EXHIBIT A
Case 1:08-cv-07104-DC Document 1077-1 Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 27 EXHIBIT A Case 1:08-cv-07104-DC Document 1077-1 Filed 01/07/15 Page 2 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
More informationCase 3:15-cv EMC Document 35 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 30
Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) Julia A. Luster (State Bar No. 0) 0 North California Boulevard, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone:
More informationPlaintiff, Speedee Distribution, LLC ( Plaintiff or Speedee ), by its attorneys, brings this
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SPEEDEE DISTRIBUTION, LLC, Plaintiff, Index No.: - against - COMPLAINT THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY, LLC, Defendant. Plaintiff, Speedee Distribution,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:16-cv-01220-JRT-FLN Document 60 Filed 05/05/17 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA BENJAMIN HUDOCK, BREANN HUDOCK, and GERALD DELOSS, individually and on behalf of all
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit VIRGINIA INNOVATION SCIENCES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Piester v. Escobar, 2015 IL App (3d) 140457 Appellate Court Caption SEANTAE PIESTER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. SANJUANA ESCOBAR, Respondent-Appellant. District &
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.
Case :-cv-0-lab-mdd Document Filed // PageID. Page of 0 0 David A. Nelson (pro hac vice forthcoming) (Ill. Bar No. 0) davenelson@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 00 West Madison
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:17-cv-05222 Document 1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA IVAN VILLA LARA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v.
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/12/16 Page 1 of 30. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Case 1:16-cv-02725 Document 1 Filed 04/12/16 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WE SHALL OVERCOME FOUNDATION, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,
More informationRegulation No. 6 Peer Review
Regulation No. 6 Peer Review Effective May 10, 2018 Copyright 2018 Appraisal Institute. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored
More informationWEBSITE LOOK DRESS DRESSING TRADE EEL : RESSING? T I M O T H Y S. D E J O N G N A D I A H. D A H A B
WEBSITE LOOK AND FEEL EEL : TRADE DRESS OR WINDOW DRESSING RESSING? 1 T I M O T H Y S. D E J O N G N A D I A H. D A H A B O R E G O N S TAT E B A R, I P S E C T I O N D E C E M B E R 2, 2 0 1 5 STOLL BERNE
More informationPATENT LAW. Randy Canis
PATENT LAW Randy Canis CLASS 8 Claims 1 Claims (Chapter 9) Claims define the invention described in a patent or patent application Example: A method of electronically distributing a class via distance
More informationCase 14-V- Petition of Verizon New York Inc. for Orders of Entry for 21 Multiple-Dwelling Unit Buildings in the City of New York
140 West Street 27 th Floor New York, NY 10007 Tel (212) 321-8115 Fax (212) 962-1687 richard.fipphen@verizon.com Richard C. Fipphen Assistant General Counsel March 17, 2014 Honorable Kathleen H. Burgess
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM. TRIBUNE TELEVISION COMPANY (COMPANY) WXIN/WTTV (STATION) Indianapolis, IN (DESIGNATED MARKET AREA)
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM TRIBUNE TELEVISION COMPANY (COMPANY) WXIN/WTTV (STATION) Indianapolis, IN (DESIGNATED MARKET AREA) For the Distribution Broadcast Rights to the Sony Pictures Television
More informationFord v. Panasonic Corp
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-1-2008 Ford v. Panasonic Corp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-2513 Follow this and
More informationCLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING, INC. (COMPANY) WHP/WLYH (STATION) HARRISBURG, PA (MARKET)
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING, INC. (COMPANY) WHP/WLYH (STATION) HARRISBURG, PA (MARKET) For the Distribution Broadc a s t Rights to the Sony Pictur e s Television Inc.
More informationIdentity/Gender Expression and Sexual Orientation under the California Fair
WAUKEEN Q. McCOY, ESQ. (SBN: 168228) LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. McCOY 703 Market Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, California 94103 Telephone: (415) 675-7705 Facsimile: (415) 675-2530 E-mail: mail@mccoyslaw.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Jonathan Shub (0) Kohn Swift & Graf, P.C. One South Broad Street, Suite 0 Philadelphia, PA 0 Telephone: --00 Facsimile: -- Email: jshub@kohnswift.com
More informationPAPER: FD4 MARKS AWARD : 61. The skilled person is familiar with insect traps and is likely a designer or manufacturer of insect traps.
PAPER: FD4 MARKS AWARD : 61 Construction The skilled person is familiar with insect traps and is likely a designer or manufacturer of insect traps. What would such a skilled person understand the claims
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, AND TV GUIDE ONLINE, LLC, AND TV GUIDE ONLINE, INC.,
More informationCase3:08-cv JW Document279-2 Filed07/02/12 Page1 of 10. Exhibit B
Case:0-cv-0-JW Document- Filed0/0/ Page of 0 Exhibit B Case:0-cv-0-JW Case:0-cv-00-JW Document- Document0 Filed0// Filed0/0/ Page Page of 0 0 John L. Cooper (State Bar No. 00) jcooper@fbm.com Nan Joesten
More informationAMENDMENT TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. ABSOLUTE SOFTWARE, INC., and Absolute Software Corp, Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants. v. STEALTH SIGNAL, INC., and Computer Security Products,
More informationTrial decision. Conclusion The trial of the case was groundless. The costs in connection with the trial shall be borne by the demandant.
Trial decision Invalidation No. 2007-800070 Ishikawa, Japan Demandant Nanao Corporation Osaka, Japan Patent Attorney SUGITANI, Tsutomu Osaka, Japan Patent Attorney TODAKA, Hiroyuki Osaka, Japan Patent
More informationStanding Committee on Copyright and Related Rights
E SCCR/34/4 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: MAY 5, 2017 Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights Thirty-Fourth Session Geneva, May 1 to 5, 2017 Revised Consolidated Text on Definitions, Object of Protection,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-0-doc-rnb Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 00) Christina A. Humphrey, Esq. (SBN ) Leslie H. Joyner, Esq. (SBN 0) Canwood Street, Suite
More informationTrial decision. Invalidation No Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan 1 / 28
Trial decision Invalidation No. 2016-800070 Demandant FUJIFILM CORPORATION Patent Attorney KOBAYASHI, Hiroshi Patent Attorney KUROKAWA, Megumu Attorney KATAYAMA, Eiji Attorney HATTORI, Makoto Attorney
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:18-cv-05800 Document 1 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY,
More informationUTILITIES (220 ILCS 5/) Public Utilities Act.
Information maintained by the Legislative Reference Bureau Updating the database of the Illinois Compiled Statutes (ILCS) is an ongoing process. Recent laws may not yet be included in the ILCS database,
More informationDate. James W. Davis, PhD James W. Davis Consultant Inc.
Measurement Report W D C C (FM) Tower Site Sanford, rth Carolina Prepared for Central Carolina Community College Prepared by: James W. Davis, PhD July 30, 2003 I, James W. Davis, contract engineer for
More informationPaper Entered: July 7, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 13 571-272-7822 Entered: July 7, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD DEXCOWIN GLOBAL, INC., Petitioner, v. ARIBEX, INC., Patent
More informationXviewerEYE Video and Waveform Viewer Feature
User s Manual 701992 XviewerEYE Video and Waveform Viewer Feature 3rd Edition Thank you for purchasing the XviewerEYE Video and Waveform Viewer Software. This manual, focused on Windows XP, explains features
More informationMCPS IPC Music Programme Terms and Conditions
ANNEX B STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Definitions Ad-bumper Agreement Authorised Exploitation means a short piece of audio-visual material played at the start and end of commercial breaks during the
More informationFCC 396. BROADCAST EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM REPORT (To be filed with broadcast license renewal application)
Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 FCC 396 Approved by OMB 3060-0113 (March 2003) BROADCAST EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM REPORT (To be filed with broadcast license renewal
More informationSO YOU THINK YOU CAN DANCE Audition Terms and Conditions
SO YOU THINK YOU CAN DANCE Audition Terms and Conditions So You Think You Can Dance (the Program ) is a United States television program in which a competition will be conducted to select America s Favorite
More informationCharles T. Armstrong, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, McLean, VA, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION
United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. NEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff. v. HYUNDAI ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. and Hyundai Electronics America, Inc. Defendants. Hyundai Electronics
More informationUNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD LUXSHARE PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD LUXSHARE PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD., Petitioner v. BING XU PRECISION CO., LTD., Patent Owner CASE: Unassigned Patent
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit LYDALL THERMAL/ACOUSTICAL, INC., LYDALL THERMAL/ACOUSTICAL SALES, LLC, and LYDALL, INC., v. Plaintiffs-Appellants,
More informationCase 14-V- Petition of Verizon New York Inc. for Orders of Entry for 25 Multiple-Dwelling Unit Buildings in the City of New York
140 West Street 27 th Floor New York, NY 10007 Tel (212) 321-8115 Fax (212) 962-1687 richard.fipphen@verizon.com Richard C. Fipphen Assistant General Counsel January 10, 2014 Honorable Kathleen H. Burgess
More informationCase 14-V- Petition of Verizon New York Inc. for Orders of Entry for 13 Multiple-Dwelling Unit Buildings in the City of New York
140 West Street 27 th Floor New York, NY 10007 Tel (212) 321-8115 Fax (212) 962-1687 richard.fipphen@verizon.com Richard C. Fipphen Assistant General Counsel March 28, 2014 Honorable Kathleen H. Burgess
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/16 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01113 Document 1 Filed 10/07/16 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MARKING OBJECT VIRTUALIZATION INTELLIGENCE,
More informationSIRIUS HOME ANTENNA USER GUIDE & WARRANTY
SIRIUS HOME ANTENNA FOR USER GUIDE & WARRANTY Thank you for purchasing the Monster SIRIUS Home Antenna for SIRIUS Satellite Radio. Your new antenna lets you enjoy SIRIUS Satellite Radio in the comfort
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Peter J. Anderson, Esq., Cal. Bar No. 1 E-Mail: pja@pjanderson.com LAW OFFICES OF PETER J. ANDERSON A Professional Corporation 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Santa Monica, CA 001 Tel: (
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on ) WC Docket No. 13-307 Petition of Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387
Federal Communications Commission Approved by OMB Washington, D.C. 20554 3060-1105 INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387 DTV TRANSITION STATUS REPORT GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS A. FCC Form 387 is to be used by all licensees/permittees
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-rgk-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 Francis Malofiy, Esq. Francis Alexander, LLC 0 N. Providence Rd. Suite 0 Media, PA 0 T: () 00-000; F: () 00-00 E: francis@francisalexander.com
More informationAMENDED MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE BRINGING OF A CLASS ACTION AND TO ASCRIBE THE STATUS OF REPRESENTATIVE (Art C.C.P.
C A N A D A PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL S U P E R I O R C O U R T (Class action) No : 500-06-000491-098 E. BEN-ELI Petitioner -vs- TOSHIBA OF CANADA LIMITED, legal person duly constituted,
More informationdismiss? Most of my reading of case law involves Westlaw, which obviously
Graphics Inside of a Motion to Dismiss? Team - What are your thoughts on putting flow charts inside of a motion to dismiss? Most of my reading of case law involves Westlaw, which obviously is graphics
More informationTrial decision. Invalidation No Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan 1 / 33
Trial decision Invalidation No. 2016-800069 Tokyo, Japan Demandant FUJIFILM CORPORATION Tokyo, Japan Patent Attorney KOBAYASHI, Hiroshi Tokyo, Japan Patent Attorney KUROKAWA, Megumu Tokyo, Japan Attorney
More informationFESTIVAL INTERNACIONAL 2016 DE CORTOMETRAJES AMBIENTALES
FESTIVAL INTERNACIONAL 2016 DE CORTOMETRAJES AMBIENTALES I. REGISTRATION. 1. Registration for the International Environmental Short Film Festival 2016 is free. 2. The shipping of materials ECOFILM Festival
More informationAPPENDIX B. Standardized Television Disclosure Form INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 355 STANDARDIZED TELEVISION DISCLOSURE FORM
APPENDIX B Standardized Television Disclosure Form Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Not approved by OMB 3060-XXXX INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 355 STANDARDIZED TELEVISION DISCLOSURE FORM
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, TV WORKS, LLC, and COMCAST MO GROUP, INC., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-859 SPRINT
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-353 JAMES C. BROWN, IV VERSUS ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. ************ APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RAPIDES,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT )))))))))))) Appeal No (Case No. 07-C-513 (E.D. Wis.
JAY STARKWEATHER, v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT )))))))))))) Appeal No. 08-2354 (Case No. 07-C-513 (E.D. Wis.)) )))))))))))) Petitioner-Appellant, JUDY P. SMITH, Warden, Oshkosh
More information