AP English Language and Composition 2014 Scoring Guidelines

Similar documents
AP English Language and Composition 2008 Scoring Guidelines

AP English Language and Composition 2006 Scoring Guidelines

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2006 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B) Question 1

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Advanced Placement English Language and Composition Summer Reading Assignment

AP English Literature and Composition 2004 Scoring Guidelines Form B

Summer Reading Assignment 2014 Advanced Placement English Language and Composition

AP English Literature 1999 Scoring Guidelines

AP English Literature and Composition 2012 Scoring Guidelines

AP English Literature and Composition 2001 Scoring Guidelines

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP English Literature and Composition

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

AP English Literature and Composition

Western School of Technology and Environmental Science First Quarter Reading Assignment ENGLISH 10 GT

AP English Literature and Composition

AP English Literature and Composition 2010 Scoring Guidelines

The Feast of Literature

o Mandatory Reading 1: In Cold Blood- Truman Capote

English 12 January 2000 Provincial Examination

Test Blueprint QualityCore End-of-Course Assessment English 10

AP Language and Composition

Folgerpedia: Folger Shakespeare Library. "The Tempest. Folger Shakespeare Library. n.d. Web. June 12, 2018

AP Literature and Composition Cleaver

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

English 12 January 2001 Provincial Examination

Read the following excerpt from a poem by Walt Whitman.

AP Studio Art 2006 Scoring Guidelines

AP Literature and Composition

Volume, pace, clarity and expression are appropriate. Tone of voice occasionally engages the audience

NMSI English Mock Exam Lesson Poetry Analysis 2013

CLEP College Composition: at a Glance

English 12 June 2000 Provincial Examination

AP Spanish Literature 2009 Scoring Guidelines

ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION SECTION II Total time--2 hours. Question 1. The Century Quilt. for Sarah Mary Taylor, Quilter

Mount Olive High School. Summer Reading Program. English IV AP Literature & Composition

AP LATIN: VERGIL 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

TASC Writing Scoring Rubrics

Student Performance Q&A:

AP Spanish Literature 2000 Scoring Guidelines

MFA Thesis Assessment Rubric Student Learning Outcome 1

Prospectus Final Draft

VCE Literature

2001 HSC Music 1 Marking Guidelines

A noise outside awakens you one night. You look out the window and see a spaceship. The door

RESEARCH PAPER. Statement of research issue, possibly revised

English 120 Yanover -- Essay #1: Analysis of a Passion: the Social Significance of Your Topic

UNIT PLAN. Subject Area: English IV Unit #: 4 Unit Name: Seventeenth Century Unit. Big Idea/Theme: The Seventeenth Century focuses on carpe diem.

AP Music Theory. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 1. Scoring Guideline.

Rhetorical Analysis Strategies and Assignments Randy S. Gingrich, Ph.D. Fulton County Schools

SOAPSTone. Speaker Occasion Audience Purpose Subject Tone

Course Prerequisites: The student should have successfully completed sophomore English.

AP English Language 2000 Scoring Commentary

Examples of the Standards for Students Writing. Social Studies From the January 2015 Diploma Examination

Opening Thought / Reflection: Answer the following prompt below, drawing from your own personal experience.

Symbolism in "Two Kinds"

Advanced Placement English Language and Composition

AP Music Theory. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 4. Scoring Guideline.

AN INTEGRATED CURRICULUM UNIT FOR THE CRITIQUE OF PROSE AND FICTION

Unit 3: Multimodal Rhetoric Remix Assignment 5: Photo Essay & Rhetorical Analysis

SAMPLE ASSESSMENT TASKS MUSIC GENERAL YEAR 12

OIB class of th grade LV1. 3 h. H-G Literature. 4 h. 2 h. (+2 h French) LV1 Literature. 11th grade. 2,5 h 4 h. 6,5 h.

SUMMER READING / ENGLISH 10 MYP LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE

AP Literature and Composition. Prose. The Birthday Party by Katharine Brush

Summer Reading, 2017 World Literature (H) Mr. Murphy

Rubric Project 4: Security Analysis Findings and Recommendation

Examples of the Standards for Students Writing. Social Studies From the January 2012 Diploma Examination

Japanese 12 June 1998 Provincial Examination

2002 HSC Drama Marking Guidelines Practical tasks and submitted works

AP English 3 11 th Grade Summer Reading Annotation Assignment

AP ENGLISH 11: LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION SUMMER ASSIGNMENT 2015 MEYER & MCGOVERN

AP Music Theory. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 7. Scoring Guideline.

AP Music Theory. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 3. Scoring Guideline.

ReadBox Project Songbird - Parody Rubric

Persuasive Speech Rubric

Summer Reading - Grades 9, 10, 11, 12 Academic

SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

Early and Middle Childhood / Art. Component 1: Content Knowledge SAMPLE ITEMS AND SCORING RUBRICS

Knowledge Organiser. Year 10 Music Composing

AP Music Theory 2015 Free-Response Questions

Assignment #3 CAPSTONE Research Paper Topic Selection Sheet. Student Name TOPIC 1 TOPIC 2. Source 1. TOPIC 3. Sources: 1.

Essay #1: Analysis of The Orchid Thief. Deadline: Submitted to Turnitin as a Single File Upload by 11:30pm on Tuesday, 2/20.

AP English Language & Composition. Personal Narrative. Identification & Imitation

AP Lit & Comp 11/30 15

Charles Ball, "the Georgian Slave"

2012 HSC Latin Extension Marking Guidelines

How Appeals Are Created High School Lesson

THE BASIS OF JAZZ ASSESSMENT

English II Pre- AP/GT

timed writing timed writings context persona

How to Write a Paper for a Forensic Damages Journal

This is a template or graphic organizer that explains the process of writing a timed analysis essay for the AP Language and Composition exam.

Model Text Analysis Rubric: Peer Review Tool

Publishing Your Research in Peer-Reviewed Journals: The Basics of Writing a Good Manuscript.

English 12 First Peoples 2009/10 Sample Examination Form A Provincial Examination Answer Key

AP Language and Composition Summer Reading List

What is your opinion of the idea that perseverance is an essential human quality?

Technical Writing Style

Transcription:

AP English Language and Composition 2014 Scoring Guidelines College Board, Advanced Placement Program, AP, AP Central, and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of the College Board. AP Central is the official online home for the AP Program: apcentral.collegeboard.org.

Question 1 The essay score should reflect the essay s quality as a whole. Remember that students had only 15 minutes to read the sources and 40 minutes to write; the essay, therefore, is not a finished product and should not be judged by standards appropriate for an out-of-class assignment. Evaluate it as a draft, making certain to reward students for what they do well. All essays, even those scored 8 or 9, may contain occasional lapses in analysis, prose style, or mechanics. Such features should enter into a holistic evaluation of an essay s overall quality. In no case should an essay with many distracting errors in grammar and mechanics score higher than a 2. 9 Essays earning a score of 9 meet the criteria for the score of 8 and, in addition, are especially sophisticated in their argument, thorough in development, or impressive in their control of language. 8 Effective Essays earning a score of 8 effectively evaluate whether college is worth its cost. They develop their argument by effectively synthesizing* at least three of the sources. The evidence and explanations used are appropriate and convincing, and the link between the sources and the writer s argument is strong. The prose demonstrates a consistent ability to control a wide range of the elements of effective writing but is not necessarily flawless. 7 Essays earning a score of 7 meet the criteria for the score of 6 but provide more complete explanation, more thorough development, or a more mature prose style 6 Adequate Essays earning a score of 6 adequately evaluate whether college is worth its cost. They develop their argument by adequately synthesizing at least three of the sources. The evidence and explanations used are appropriate and sufficient, and the link between the sources and the writer s argument is apparent. The language may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but generally the prose is clear. 5 Essays earning a score of 5 evaluate whether college is worth its cost. They develop their argument by synthesizing at least three sources, but how they use and explain sources is somewhat uneven, inconsistent, or limited. The writer s argument is generally clear, and the sources generally develop the writer s position, but the link between the sources and the writer s argument may be strained. The writing may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but it usually conveys the writer s ideas. 4 Inadequate Essays earning a score of 4 inadequately evaluate whether college is worth its cost. They develop their argument by synthesizing at least two sources, but the evidence or explanations used may be inappropriate, insufficient, or unconvincing. The sources may dominate the writer s attempts at development; the link between the sources and the writer s argument may be weak; or the writer may misunderstand, misrepresent, or oversimplify the sources. The prose generally conveys the writer s ideas but may be inconsistent in controlling the elements of effective writing.

Question 1 (continued) 3 Essays earning a score of 3 meet the criteria for the score of 4 but demonstrate less success in evaluating whether college is worth its cost. They are less perceptive in demonstrating understanding of the sources, or their explanation or examples may be particularly limited or simplistic. The essays may show less maturity in control of writing. 2 Little Success Essays earning a score of 2 demonstrate little success in evaluating whether college is worth its cost. They may merely allude to knowledge gained from reading the sources rather than citing the sources themselves. The link between the sources and the writer s argument is weak or absent. These essays may misread the sources, fail to develop a position, or substitute a simpler task by merely summarizing or categorizing the sources or by merely responding to the prompt tangentially with unrelated, inaccurate, or inappropriate explanation. The prose of essays that score 2 often demonstrates consistent weaknesses in writing, such as grammatical problems, a lack of development or organization, or a lack of control. 1 Essays earning a score of 1 meet the criteria for the score of 2 but are undeveloped, especially simplistic in their explanation, weak in their control of writing, or they do not use or even allude to one source. 0 Indicates an off-topic response, one that merely repeats the prompt, an entirely crossed-out response, a drawing, or a response in a language other than English. Indicates an entirely blank response. For the purposes of scoring, synthesis means using sources to develop a position and citing them accurately.

Question 2 The essay score should reflect the essay s quality as a whole. Remember that students had only 40 minutes to read and write; the essay, therefore, is not a finished product and should not be judged by standards appropriate for an out-of-class assignment. Evaluate the essay as a draft, making certain to reward students for what they do well. All essays, even those scored 8 or 9, may contain occasional lapses in analysis, prose style, or mechanics. Such features should enter into a holistic evaluation of an essay s overall quality. In no case should an essay with many distracting errors in grammar and mechanics score higher than a 2. 8 Effective 9 Essays earning a score of 9 meet the criteria for the score of 8 and, in addition, are especially sophisticated in their argument, thorough in their development, or impressive in their control of language. Essays earning a score of 8 effectively analyze the rhetorical strategies Adams uses to advise her son. They develop their analysis* with evidence and explanations that are appropriate and convincing, referring to the passage explicitly or implicitly. The prose demonstrates a consistent ability to control a wide range of the elements of effective writing but is not necessarily flawless. 7 Essays earning a score of 7 meet the criteria for the score of 6 but provide more complete explanation, more thorough development, or a more mature prose style. 6 Adequate Essays earning a score of 6 adequately analyze the rhetorical strategies Adams uses to advise her son. They develop their analysis with evidence and explanations that are appropriate and sufficient, referring to the passage explicitly or implicitly. The writing may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but generally the prose is clear. 5 Essays earning a score of 5 analyze the rhetorical strategies Adams uses to advise her son. The evidence or explanations used may be uneven, inconsistent, or limited. The writing may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but it usually conveys the writer s ideas. 4 Inadequate Essays earning a score of 4 inadequately analyze the rhetorical strategies Adams uses to advise her son. These essays may misunderstand the passage, misrepresent the strategies Adams uses, or may analyze these strategies insufficiently. The evidence or explanations used may be inappropriate, insufficient, or unconvincing. The prose generally conveys the writer s ideas but may be inconsistent in controlling the elements of effective writing. 3 Essays earning a score of 3 meet the criteria for the score of 4 but demonstrate less success in analyzing the rhetorical strategies Adams uses to advise her son. They are less perceptive in their understanding of the passage or Adams s strategies, or the explanations or examples may be particularly limited or simplistic. The essays may show less maturity in control of writing.

2 Little Success AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION Question 2 (continued) Essays earning a score of 2 demonstrate little success in analyzing the rhetorical strategies Adams uses to advise her son. These essays may misunderstand the prompt, misread the passage, fail to analyze the strategies Adams uses, or substitute a simpler task by responding to the prompt tangentially with unrelated, inaccurate, or inappropriate explanation. The prose often demonstrates consistent weaknesses in writing, such as grammatical problems, a lack of development or organization, or a lack of control. 1 Essays earning a score of 1 meet the criteria for the score of 2 but are undeveloped, especially simplistic in their explanation, or weak in their control of language. 0 Indicates an off-topic response, one that merely repeats the prompt, an entirely crossed-out response, a drawing, or a response in a language other than English. Indicates an entirely blank response. * For the purposes of scoring, analysis means explaining the rhetorical choices an author makes in an attempt to achieve a particular effect or purpose.

Question 3 The score should reflect the essay s quality as a whole. Remember that students had only 40 minutes to read and write; the essay, therefore, is not a finished product and should not be judged by standards appropriate for an out-of-class assignment. Evaluate the essay as a draft, making certain to reward students for what they do well. All essays, even those scored 8 or 9, may contain occasional lapses in analysis, prose style, or mechanics. Such features should enter into a holistic evaluation of an essay s overall quality. In no case should an essay with many distracting errors in grammar and mechanics score higher than a 2. 8 Effective 9 Essays earning a score of 9 meet the criteria for the score of 8 and, in addition, are especially sophisticated in their argument, thorough in their development, or particularly impressive in their control of language. Essays earning a score of 8 effectively explain what the writer means by creativity and argue for or against the creation of a class in creativity. The evidence and explanations used are appropriate and convincing, and the argument* is especially coherent and well developed. The prose demonstrates a consistent ability to control a wide range of the elements of effective writing but is not necessarily flawless. 7 Essays earning a score of 7 meet the criteria for the score of 6 but provide a more complete explanation, more thorough development, or a more mature prose style. 6 Adequate Essays earning a score of 6 adequately explain what the writer means by creativity and argue for or against the creation of a class in creativity. The evidence and explanations used are appropriate and sufficient, and the argument is coherent and adequately developed. The writing may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but generally the prose is clear. 5 Essays earning a score of 5 explain what the writer means by creativity and argue for or against the creation of a class in creativity. The evidence or explanations used may be uneven, inconsistent, or limited. The writing may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but it usually conveys the writer s ideas. 4 Inadequate Essays earning a score of 4 inadequately explain what the writer means by creativity and argue for or against the creation of a class in creativity. The evidence or explanations used may be inappropriate, insufficient, or unconvincing. The argument may have lapses in coherence or be inadequately developed. The prose generally conveys the writer s ideas but may be inconsistent in controlling the elements of effective writing. 3 Essays earning a score of 3 meet the criteria for the score of 4 but demonstrate less success in explaining what the writer means by creativity and arguing for or against the creation of a class in creativity. The essays may show less maturity in control of writing.

2 Little Success AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION Question 3 (continued) Essays earning a score of 2 demonstrate little success in explaining what the writer means by creativity and arguing for or against the creation of a class in creativity. These essays may demonstrate misunderstanding of the prompt, or substitute a simpler task by responding to the prompt tangentially with unrelated, inaccurate, or inappropriate explanation. The prose often demonstrates consistent weaknesses in writing, such as grammatical problems, a lack of development or organization, or a lack of coherence and control. 1 Essays earning a score of 1 meet the criteria for the score of 2 but are undeveloped, especially simplistic in their explanation and argument, weak in their control of language, or especially lacking in coherence. 0 Indicates an off-topic response, one that merely repeats the prompt, an entirely crossed-out response, a drawing, or a response in a language other than English. Indicates an entirely blank response. * For the purposes of scoring, argument means asserting a claim justified by evidence and/or reasoning