12JZD019 E. D. xhh420@163. com Title Intention and Language On Hirsch's Linguistic Explication of the Author's Intention Abstract American scholar Hirsch insists on taking the author's intention as the essential premise and the fundamental basis of interpretation and the main force which maintains his opinions is the explication exploration and construction in linguistic dimension. Firstly he indicates that intention is prior to language through the diagnosis of semantic autonomism and ontological linguistics and shows his critical reflection on the important cultural event-the linguistic turn. In light of this Hirsch proposes the notion of speaking subjectand emphasizes that intention can not be completely divorced from language and should be specified and clarified by the role of public language. Hirsch's theory not only deepens his existing discussions about the author's intention but also effectively promotes the theorizations on the relationship between intention and language in contemporary context. Keywords Hirsch the author's intention the linguistic turn speaking subject author construct Author Pang Hong Ph. D. is an assistant researcher at the Institute of Arts Nanjing University Nanjing 210093 China with research interests in Western literary theory art theory and visual culture. Email xhh420@163. com E. D. Hirsch Jr. Hans-Georg Gadamer 2 1 181
2015 1 Richard Rorty Rorty 373 M. A. R. Habib Lewis Carroll Through the Looking Glass Humpty Dumpty 60 70 Donnellan 203 Hancher 56 René Wellek 79 William K. Wimsatt Monroe C. Beardsley intention fallacy the linguistic turn Habib 569 close reading semantic autonomism 20 182
Hirsch Validity4 Hirsch Validity 5-6 Hirsch The Aims76 ontological linguistics Hirsch Objective471 T. S. Eliot Eliot 23 William Empson Wilhelm von ambiguity Humboldt 19 55 4 Martin Heidegger 3 615 logos Hirsch Validity12 183
2015 1 Hirsch Validity29 Hirsch Validity 31 bachelor unmarried man Ferdinand de Saussure language parole Ludwig Wittgenstein Hirsch Truth 493 150 Hirsch Truth492-93 184
George Orwell 132 Hirsch Wordsworth147-48 speaking subject Hirsch Validity3 1960 Hirsch Objective478 Hirsch Objective478 Ernst Cassirer 33 James Joyce Finnegans Wake 185
2015 1 Irwin 17 Hirsch Objective477 4 ur urauthor Wayne C. Booth implied author The Rhetoric of Fiction Irwin 31 80 Irwin 39 Hirsch Objective 3 478 5 William Irwin author construct Intentionalist Interpretation 6 186
Luce Irigaray 41 Notes 1 Robert R. Magliola Phenomenology and Literature An Introduction Peter D. Juhl Interpretation An Essay in the Philosophy of Literary Criticism Patrick Swinden Literature and the Philosophy of Intention Paisley Livingston Art and Intention A Philosophical Study Burhanettin Tatar 2 G. B. Madison Tatar 51 Madison G. B.. The Hermeneutics of Postmodernity Figures and Themes. Bloomington Indiana University Press 1988. 3 1998 9-14 4 15. 3 2013 325-30 5 6 Jeff Mitscherling Mitscherling Jeff Tanya DiTommaso and Aref Nayed. The Author's Intention. Lanham Md. Lexington Books 2004. 7 21 1 2005 66-68 Works Cited 1987 7 Booth Wayne C..The Rhetoric of Fiction. Trans. Hua Ming et al. Beijing Peking University Press 1987. 187
2015 1 Romanticism. New Haven Yale University Press 1985 Cassirer Ernst. An Essay on Man. Trans. Gan Yang. Shanghai Shanghai Translation Publishing House 1985. 1998 2004 Gadamer Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Trans. Hong Handing. House 2004. Shanghai Shanghai Translation Publishing Habib M. A. R.. A History of Literary Criticism From Plato to the Present. Oxford Blackwell 2005. Hancher Michael. Humpty Dumpty and Verbal Meaning. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40. 1 1981 49-58. Wellek René and Austin Warren. Theory of Literature. 1997 Heidegger Martin. On the Way to Language. Trans. Sun Zhouxing. Beijing The Commercial Press 1997. Hirsch E. D. Jr.. Objective Interpretation. PMLA 75. 4 1960 463-79. Trans. Liu Xiangyu et al. Nanjing Jiangsu Education Publishing House 2005. 1996 Wittgenstein Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. ---. The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago University of Li Bulou. Beijing The Commercial Press 1996. Chicago Press 1976. ---. Truth and Method in Interpretation. The Review of 2006 Metaphysics 18. 3 1965 488-507. Yan Jia ed. Literary Theory An Essential Reader. ---. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven Yale University Press 1967. Beijing China Renmin University Press 2006. ---. Wordsworth and Schelling A Typological Study of 1960. 1999 Humboldt Wilhelm von. On Language On the Diversity of Donnellan Keith S.. Putting Humpty Dumpty Together Human Language Construction and Its Influence on the Again. The Philosophical Review 77. 2 1968 Mental Development of the Human Species. Trans. Yao 203-15. Xiaoping. Beijing The Commercial Press 1999. Eliot Thomas S.. On Poetry and Poets. New York Octagon Books 1975. Irwin William. Intentionalist Interpretation A Philosophical Explanation and Defense. Westport Conn Greenwood Press 1999. 1996 Rorty Richard M. ed. The Linguistic Turn Essays in Empson William. Seven Types of Ambiguity. Trans. Zhou Philosophical Method. Chicago The University of Bangxian et al. Hangzhou China Academy of Art Chicago Press 1992. Press 1996. Sheppard Anne. Aesthetics An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art. Trans. Ai Yan. Shenyang Liaoning Education Press 1998. Tatar Burhanettin. Interpretation and the Problem of the Intention of the Author H. G. Gadamer vs E. D. Hirsch. Washington D. C. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy 1998. 2005 188