!"!3

Similar documents
Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)525. The RF system for FCC-ee. A. Butterworth CERN 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

ILC-LNF TECHNICAL NOTE

Diamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes

Detailed Design Report

NSLS-II RF Systems James Rose, Radio Frequency Group Leader PAC 2011

High Brightness Injector Development and ERL Planning at Cornell. Charlie Sinclair Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics

Status of BESSY II and berlinpro. Wolfgang Anders. Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin for Materials and Energy (HZB) 20th ESLS-RF Meeting

The LEP Superconducting RF System

3 cerl. 3-1 cerl Overview. 3-2 High-brightness DC Photocathode Gun and Gun Test Beamline

DESIGN OF 1.2-GEV SCL AS NEW INJECTOR FOR THE BNL AGS*

XFEL High Power RF System Recent Developments

INFN School on Electron Accelerators. RF Power Sources and Distribution

A HIGH POWER LONG PULSE HIGH EFFICIENCY MULTI BEAM KLYSTRON

Proceedings of the 1997 Workshop on RF Superconductivity, Abano Terme (Padova), Italy

PEP II Design Outline

Oak Ridge Spallation Neutron Source Proton Power Upgrade Project and Second Target Station Project

Status and Plans for PEP-II

Upgrade of CEBAF to 12 GeV

4.4 Injector Linear Accelerator

IOT OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE ON ALICE AND EMMA AT DARESBURY LABORATORY

Review of Diamond SR RF Operation and Upgrades

Introduction: CW SRF linac types, requirements and challenges High power RF system architecture

ANKA RF System - Upgrade Strategies

DEVELOPMENT OF X-BAND KLYSTRON TECHNOLOGY AT SLAC

Spear3 RF System Sam Park 11/06/2003. Spear3 RF System. High Power Components Operation and Control. RF Requirement.

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF L-BAND AND S-BAND MULTI BEAM KLYSTRONS

RF plans for ESS. Morten Jensen. ESLS-RF 2013 Berlin

Technology Challenges for SRF Guns as ERL Sources in View of Rossendorf work

Accelerator Instrumentation RD. Monday, July 14, 2003 Marc Ross

The ESS Accelerator. For Norwegian Industry and Research. Oslo, 24 Sept Håkan Danared Deputy Head Accelerator Division Group Leader Beam Physics

Present Status and Future Upgrade of KEKB Injector Linac

Dark current and multipacting trajectories simulations for the RF Photo Gun at PITZ

North Damping Ring RF

STATUS OF THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR COLLIDER

LLRF at SSRF. Yubin Zhao

RUNNING EXPERIENCE OF FZD SRF PHOTOINJECTOR

RF Upgrades & Experience At JLab. Rick Nelson

News from HZB / BESSY Wolfgang Anders at ESLS-RF Meeting September 2010 Trieste

RF Power Generation II

LCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems

Pulsed Klystrons for Next Generation Neutron Sources Edward L. Eisen - CPI, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA

L-Band RF R&D. SLAC DOE Review June 15 th, Chris Adolphsen SLAC

Welcome and FRIB Project Status. FRIB Highlights and Plan Ahead

SUMMARY OF THE ILC R&D AND DESIGN

RF considerations for SwissFEL

SLS RF operation report 2003

J/NLC Progress on R1 and R2 Issues. Chris Adolphsen

CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3

SRF-gun Development Overview. J. Sekutowicz 17 th September, 2015 SRF15, Whistler, Canada

Status of RF Power and Acceleration of the MAX IV - LINAC

PEP II STATUS AND PLANS *

45 MW, 22.8 GHz Second-Harmonic Multiplier for High-Gradient Tests*

KEKB INJECTOR LINAC AND UPGRADE FOR SUPERKEKB

LEP OPERATION AND PERFORMANCE WITH ELECTRON-POSITRON COLLISIONS AT 209 GEV

Synchrotron Light Facility. Operation of ALBA RF. Angela Salom on behalf of RF team: Francis Perez, Bea Bravo and Jesus Ocampo

ESS: The Machine. Bucharest, 24 April Håkan Danared Deputy Head Accelerator Division. H. Danared Industry & Partner Days Bucharest Page 1

2 Work Package and Work Unit descriptions. 2.8 WP8: RF Systems (R. Ruber, Uppsala)

Nick Walker DESY MAC

WG2 Group Summary. Chris Adolphsen Terry Garvey Hitoshi Hayano

KARA and FLUTE RF Overview/status

A New 4MW LHCD System for EAST

Upgrading LHC Luminosity

5 Project Costs and Schedule

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (IJECET)

DEVELOPMENT OF A 10 MW SHEET BEAM KLYSTRON FOR THE ILC*

Evaluation of Performance, Reliability, and Risk for High Peak Power RF Sources from S-band through X-band for Advanced Accelerator Applications

PEP-II Overview & Ramp Down Plan. J. Seeman DOE PEP-II Ramp Down-D&D Review August 6-7, 2007

2008 JINST 3 S LHC Machine THE CERN LARGE HADRON COLLIDER: ACCELERATOR AND EXPERIMENTS. Lyndon Evans 1 and Philip Bryant (editors) 2

High Rep Rate Guns: FZD Superconducting RF Photogun

A HIGH-POWER SUPERCONDUCTING H - LINAC (SPL) AT CERN

Program Risks Risk Analysis Fallback Plans for the. John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006

The PEFP 20-MeV Proton Linear Accelerator

Status of SOLARIS. Paweł Borowiec On behalf of Solaris Team

SRS and ERLP developments. Andrew moss

The Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation

THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER TEST ACCELERATOR: STATUS AND RESULTS * Abstract

Production of accelerators and accelerator components in industry

STATUS AND COMMISSIONING RESULTS OF THE R&D ERL AT BNL*

PEP II Status and Plans

The FLASH objective: SASE between 60 and 13 nm

Next Linear Collider. The 8-Pack Project. 8-Pack Project. Four 50 MW XL4 X-band klystrons installed on the 8-Pack

IOT RF Power Sources for Pulsed and CW Linacs

reported by T. Shintake KEK / RIKEN Japan Summary of C-band R&D for Linear Collider at KEK New soft-x-ray FEL Project at RIKEN/SPring-8

Proton Engineering Frontier Project

TITLE PAGE. Title of paper: PUSH-PULL FEL, A NEW ERL CONCEPT Author: Andrew Hutton. Author Affiliation: Jefferson Lab. Requested Proceedings:

Status of CTF3. G.Geschonke CERN, AB

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION Multi-beam S-band Klystron type BT267

Overview of NLC/JLC Collaboration *

ARES Status 2004(JFY)

PEP-I1 RF Feedback System Simulation

SLAC R&D Program for a Polarized RF Gun

Status of KEK X-band Test Facility and its future plans

Studies on an S-band bunching system with hybrid buncher

A New High Intensity Proton Source. The SCRF Proton Driver. (and more!) at Fermilab. July 15, Bill Foster SRF2005

Phase (deg) Phase (deg) Positive feedback, 317 ma. Negative feedback, 330 ma. jan2898/1638: beam pseudospectrum around 770*frev.

ANKA Status Report. N.Smale, A.-S. Müller, E. Huttel, M.Schuh Slides courtesy of A.-S. Müller and C.Heske.

Experimental Results of the Coaxial Multipactor Experiment. T.P. Graves, B. LaBombard, S.J. Wukitch, I.H. Hutchinson PSFC-MIT

ABORT DIAGNOSTICS AND ANALYSIS DURING KEKB OPERATION

Electron linac photo-fission driver for rare isotope program at TRIUMF

Transcription:

Abstract A single-mode 500 MHz superconducting cavity cryomodule has been developed at Cornell for the electronpositron collider/synchrotron light source CESR. The Cornell B-cell cavity belongs to the first generation of high-power, HOM-damped accelerating cavities designed to support high average beam currents in storage rings. The B-cell cryomodule is the key component of a four-cavity CESR RF system, which can support total beam current of several hundreds milliamperes. The Cornell design has been transferred to industry and the cryomodules are now available as turn-key systems. In this presentation we will describe main design features of the cryomodule and review operating experience and results obtained since the installation of the first cryomodule in CESR almost a decade ago.

Outline Why SRF? History of the Cornell cryomodule development Cryomodule description CESR RF system Operating experience: overcoming initial difficulties Operating experience: quest for high luminosity New challenges: satisfying two different sets of operating conditions (CESR-c and CHESS) Future: CESR-TF ILC damping ring test facility Summary

Single-mode cavity concept

Why SC cavities are better? 1. Higher accelerating gradients accelerating gradient of n.c. cavities is limited by power dissipation in cavity walls and for 500 MHz cavities it corresponds to 1 MV/cell (SLAC B-factory singlecell cavity) higher accelerating voltage per cell (up to 3 MV) of s.c. cavities fewer number of cells less total impedance 2. Larger beam tubes due to the power dissipation limit in n.c. cavities they have to have high R/Q of fundamental mode re-entrant shape and small beam tubes high R/Qs of HOMs reduced the interaction of the beam with the s.c. cavity HOMs are removed easily lower Q factors better beam stability

Cornell Electron Storage Ring CESR was built in late 70s for HEP. Both accelerator and detector were upgraded several times. Until 2003 CESR operated in collider mode at high energies (4.7 to 5.6 GeV) for B physics. CESR had highest luminosity in the world until ~2000, when B-factories surpassed it. SR experiments operated in parasitic mode. Original RF system had two 14-cell copper cavities, later replaced with four 5-cell copper cavities. Single cell superconducting cavities were developed for a proposed Cornell B-factory CESR-B and then utilized in CESR-III upgrade (four cavities).

Cornell B-cell cavity Originally developed for Cornell B-factory proposal in early 1990s Fluted beam tube (cut-off frequencies 570 MHz for TE 11 and 932 for TM 01 ) allows propagation of two lowest dipole modes TM 110 (607 MHz) and TE 111 (650 MHz) Resonant frequency R/Q Q 0 10 9 Qext = Qbeam = 499.765 MHz 89 Ohm Q ext 2x10 5 Operating temperature Accelerating field Accelerating voltage Effective cell length Beam tube diameter cut-off frequency (TE 11 ) 4.5 K up to 10 MV/m up to 3 MV 0.3 m 0.24 m 732 MHz Qext was chosen to provide the most efficient operation of RF system at maximum design beam power and cavity voltage (matched conditions, for proposed CESR-B): V 2 c R Q Pbeam

Vertical dewar test results BB1-1 cavity was fabricated by Dornier, all others by ACCEL 1.0E+10 After 140ºC, 24 hr. bake BB1-1 BB1-2 BB1-3 BB1-4 BB1-4 after bake BB1-5 BB1-6 BB1-7 SRRC1 SRRC2 CLS1 CLS2 DLS1 DLS2 DLS3 Q 0 1.0E+09 Field emission Quench due to material defect 1.0E+08 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 V acc [MV]

Mark I cryomodule & beam test 1994: Beam test, first demonstration of high current operation Several benchmarks for SRF cavities: Stored beam currents up to 220 ma 155 kw delivered to beam with 165 kw forward power 2 kw of HOM power extracted by ferrite absorbers No resonant excitation of HOMs or beam instabilities were observed Performed critical cavity loss factor and impedance studies The test duration was one week

Mark II cryomodule The cryostat was redesign to fit into the CESR tunnel

Waveguide input coupler Coupling slot WR1800 Kapton window Warm RF window Cold He gas cooled WG Liquid nitrogen cooled WG Pumping section Fixed coupling @ Q ext = 2 10 5 Magnetic bias of the WG to suppress multipacting Adjustability is provided via a 3-stub WG transformer Each window is tested to 400 kw in TW and >125 kw in SW

Windows processing

Ferrite HOM load TT2-111 cooling water stainless steel shell cooling panel ferrite tiles (Elkonite) cross-section A-A m modular design 18 water-cooled Elkonite (25% Cu + 75% W) panels two ferrite tiles (2 1.5 1/8 ) soldered to each panel TT2-111 ferrite each panel is individually tested to power density of 15.5 W/cm 2 f [GHz] f [GHz]

Loss factor and HOM spectra 100000 Calculated spectrum Comparison of prediction with measurements 10000 k [V/pC] BB1 Loss Factor Q 1000 0.6 100 0.5 y = 7.733x -1.118 R 2 = 1.000 Prediction e+ 1t1b E1 e+ 1t1b E2 e+ 3t1b E1 10 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Frequency, GHz 0.4 0.3 e+ 3t1b E2 e+ 9t1b E1 e+ 9t1b E2 e- 1t1b E1 e- 1t1b E2 Fit 100000 10000 Measured spectrum E1 cavity E2 cavity W1 cavity W2 cavity 0.2 Q 1000 0.1 10 15 20 25 30 σ [mm] 100 10 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Frequency, G Hz

CESR superconducting RF system Beam energy Beam current Frequency Number of cavities R/Q per single-cell cavity Qloaded Accelerating voltage per cavity Klystron power per cavity Number of klystrons Required ampl. stability Required phase stability 1.5 to 5.6 GeV 0 to 500 ma 500 MHz 4 89 Ohm 2 10 5 to 4 10 5 1.1 to 2.4 MV up to 200 kw 2 < 1% < 0.5º

RF system diagram

CESR cryomodules history B-cell cryomodules in CESR Cryomodule 6 (ACCEL2, BB1-6, E2) (POB and HOM load vacuum leaks repaired) Cryomodule 5 (ACCEL1, BB1-7, W2) Cryomodule 4 (BB1-5, E1, awaiting refurbishing with BB1-2 cavity) (cavity was SS-particle contaminated during assembly, repared, now in Cryomodule 2)) 1999 first storage ring to run entirely on SRF cavities Cryomodule 2 (BB1-3, W2) Cryomodule 3 (BB1-4, E1) Cryomodule 2 (BB1-5, W1) (cavity had non-rapareable material defect that limited accelerating gradient, decommissioned) 1997 Cryomodule 1 (BB1-1, W1, spare) first SRF cavity installed for routine operation (RF probe was installed in wrong location causing very low S/N ratio) Cryomodule 1A (BB1-2, E2, decommissioned) (cryomodule developed He leak into cavity vacuum, cavity will be assembled in Cryomodule 4) Jan-97 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06

Cryomodule test results Q o 1.E+10 BB1-5 (W1) BB1-7 (W2) BB1 Q vs. Eacc Summary BB1-4 (E1) BB1-6 (E2) 1.E+09 1.E+08 0 1 2 3 V acc [MV]

Overcoming initial difficulties (1) The first SC cryomodule installed in CESR was assembled without baking its WG components. The consequence of this was very strong multipacting at forward power levels of 90, 130, 180, kw. We had to develop ways to process this multipacting in situ: 1. Processing with DC magnetic field bias (10 Gauss). 2. High power pulsed processing w/o beam. One can create TW in two ways: very high emitted power for a very short time after RF shut-off due to strongly over-coupled cavity, let cavity quench for ~10 ms at 10% duty cycle. 3. Beam processing by changing RF phase between two RF stations using a specially written software. Further computer simulations confirmed our observations that TW and SW mixing ratio affects multipacting bands.

Overcoming initial difficulties (2) After warming up the cryomodule we analyzed residual gas evolution and found that during first 3 months of operation cryomodule cold surfaces accumulated up to 7 equivalent monolayers of hydrogen. During CESR operation we had found that hydrogen plays very important role. Peak # Gas species Cavity HEX Elbow 1 H 2, He 9 K 22 K 85 K 2 CO/N 2, H 2, O 2, Ne 27 K 35 K 92 K 3 CO 2, CO/N 2 83 K 92 K 130 K 4 H 2, H 2 O, CO/N 2 163 K 165 K 190 K 5 H 2, H 2 O 230 K 220 K 240 K

Overcoming initial difficulties (3)

Quest for high luminosity CESR was the highest-luminosity collider in pre-b-factory era

until ~2012 Post B-physics: CESR-c & CHESS until 2008, then CESR-TF Parameter CHESS CESR-c Energy [GeV] 5.3 1.55 1.88 2.5 No. of cavities 4 4 4 4 Gradient [MV/m] 4 6.25 8.33 10 Voltage [MV] 4.8 7.5 10 12 Beam power [MW] 1.0 0.04 0.09 0.16 Beam current [A] 0.5 0.26 0.36 0.46 Synch. frequency [khz] 18 41 43 41 Bunch length [mm] 20 9.9 10.2 10.2 relatively high RF power per cavity (160 kw per cavity) emphasis on long beam lifetime, short bunches are not required low RF voltage (1.2 MV/cavity) high luminosity means strong IR focusing and short bunch length (1 cm) high RF voltage (1.85 3 MV/cavity) low beam energy loss per turn & lower beam current low RF power (10 40 kw per cavity)

CESR-c & CHESS operation CHESS beam current CESR-c beam current 250 250 e- e+ e- e+ 200 200 150 150 ma 100 100 50 50 0 Fri, May 25 Sat, May 26 Sun, May 27 Mon, May 28 Time Cavity voltage 0 Sat, April 21 Sun, April 22 Mon, April 23 Time Cavity voltage 2.5 W1 W2 E1 E2 2 1.5 MV ma 2.5 W1 W2 E1 E2 2 1.5 MV 1 1 0.5 0.5 0 Fri, May 25 Sat, May 26 Sun, May 27 Mon, May 28 Time 0 Sat, April 21 Sun, April 22 Mon, April 23 Time

CESR-c & CHESS operation CHESS CESR-c forward power forward power kw kw 180 180 160 160 140 140 120 120 W1 W2 E1 E2 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 W1 W2 E1 E2 100 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 50 100 150 total beam current, ma Reflected power kw x 10 400 200 250 300 350 400 total beam current, ma Reflected power 123 G58H&9475!35 5 " 5&.6H&94 400 350 350 300 300 250 250 200 123 G5$H&9475!35 5 " 58H&94 kw x 10 200 W1 W2 E1 E2 150 100 100 50 50 0 W1 W2 E1 E2 150 0 0 50 100 150 200 250-50 300 350 400 0 50-100 150 200 250 300 350 400-100 total beam current, ma 12345675899 100-50 34 5 5 2 45 4 4 43 5 899 5 total beam current, ma 75 75!"!3 86

Toward ILC: CESR-TF 2008 2012: proposed operation of the CESR-TF Goal: to perform crucial R&D in beam physics and instrumentation for ILC damping ring operability and reliability using a slightly redesigned CESR ring Beam energy 2.0 GeV Total RF voltage 15 MV (will need to add two more cryomodules in 2009) Total beam current 50 60 ma Number of particles per bunch 2 10 10 Bunch length 6.9 mm

Summary Cornell has over-10-year experience of using SRF cavities in a high-current storage ring under different operating conditions Even though we had a beam test, its duration was short and the first several months after the first cryomodule installation were very tough, but provided us with invaluable learning experience After overcoming initial difficulties due to mostly multipacting in the rectangular waveguide input coupler/ceramic window region and residual gas evolution, we are able to provide stable and reliable RF system for CESR Successful operation of SRF cavities attracted interest from industry and laboratories and eventually the Cornell technology was transferred to ACCEL, which now provides CESR-type cryomodules to synchrotron light sources world-wide NSSRC/Taiwan Light Source, Canadian Light Source, DIAMOND (UK), SSRF (China) as turn-key systems In the near future we plan to add two more cryomodules to the CESR RF system as part of converting the machine to an ILC damping ring test facility There are many more RF system related developments at Cornell (cryogenic controls, digital RF controls, passive cavity operation, using piezo tuners, experimental and theoretical studies of multipacting, ) that are outside the scope of this presentation