Review of the CMS muon detector system

Similar documents
li, o p a f th ed lv o v ti, N sca reb g s In tio, F, Z stitu e tests o e O v o d a eters sin u i P r th e d est sezio tefa ectro lity stem l su

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 27 Nov 2003

IPRD06 October 2nd, G. Cerminara on behalf of the CMS collaboration University and INFN Torino

STUDY OF ANODE SELF-TRIGGER ABILITY OF ME1/1 CMS ENDCAP CATHODE STRIP CHAMBER

Drift Tubes as Muon Detectors for ILC

Performance and aging of OPERA bakelite RPCs. A. Bertolin, R. Brugnera, F. Dal Corso, S. Dusini, A. Garfagnini, L. Stanco

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

The Time-of-Flight Detector for the ALICE experiment

The CMS Detector Status and Prospects

R&D on high performance RPC for the ATLAS Phase-II upgrade

The field cage for a large TPC prototype

US CMS Endcap Muon. Regional CSC Trigger System WBS 3.1.1

Commissioning and Performance of the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker with High Energy Collisions at LHC

Progress Update FDC Prototype Test Stand Development Upcoming Work

A Cylindrical GEM Detector with Analog Readout for the BESIII Experiment. Gianluigi Cibinetto (INFN Ferrara) on behalf of the BESIIICGEM consortium

The Full Scale Prototype of the Cylindrical-GEM as Inner Tracker in Kloe2

ALICE Muon Trigger upgrade

CGEM-IT project update

The Status of the ATLAS Inner Detector

Commissioning of the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT)

Local Trigger Electronics for the CMS Drift Tubes Muon Detector

Study of the performances of the ALICE muon spectrometer

CSC Data Rates, Formats and Calibration Methods

Concept and operation of the high resolution gaseous micro-pixel detector Gossip

Riccardo Farinelli. Charge Centroid Feasibility

with Low Cost and Low Material Budget

Overview of the GEM Muon System Cosmic Ray Test Program at the SSCL

Status of GEM-based Digital Hadron Calorimetry

Status of CMS and preparations for first physics

PIXEL2000, June 5-8, FRANCO MEDDI CERN-ALICE / University of Rome & INFN, Italy. For the ALICE Collaboration

Electronics for the CMS Muon Drift Tube Chambers: the Read-Out Minicrate.

THE ATLAS Inner Detector [2] is designed for precision

Status Radial Services and cable tray. 1) Holes, Flexrails, WireMesh Ctray.

The Silicon Pixel Detector (SPD) for the ALICE Experiment

Performance of a double-metal n-on-n and a Czochralski silicon strip detector read out at LHC speeds

The ATLAS Pixel Detector

FRANCO MEDDI CERN-ALICE / University of Rome & INFN, Italy. For the ALICE Collaboration

ILC Detector Work. Dan Peterson

First LHC Beams in ATLAS. Peter Krieger University of Toronto On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration

Limited Streamer Tube Project

CMS Upgrade Activities

A Large-Area Timing RPC

Progress on the development of a detector mounted analog and digital readout system

3-D position sensitive CdZnTe gamma-ray spectrometers

The CMS Drift Tube Trigger Track Finder

TORCH a large-area detector for high resolution time-of-flight

The Large TPC Prototype: Infrastructure/ Status/ Plans

TRANSITION RADIATION TRACKER FOR ATLAS PROJECT

DEPFET Active Pixel Sensors for the ILC

TitleLarge strip RPCs for the LEPS2 TOF. Author(s) Chu, M.-L.; Chang, W.-C.; Chen, J.- Equipment (2014), 766:

Reading a GEM with a VLSI pixel ASIC used as a direct charge collecting anode. R.Bellazzini - INFN Pisa. Vienna February

CATHODE-RAY OSCILLOSCOPE (CRO)

Status of the CSC Track-Finder

SCT Activities. Nick Bedford, Mateusz Dyndal, Alexander Madsen, Edoardo Rossi, Christian Sander. DESY ATLAS Weekly Meeting 03. Jun.

Trigger Report. Wesley H. Smith CMS Trigger Project Manager Report to Steering Committee February 23, 2004

Hamamatsu R1584 PMT Modifications

TRT Software Activities

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

LHC Beam Instrumentation Further Discussion

Dick Loveless. 20 November 2008 SLHC Workshop. Dick Loveless SLHC Workshop 20 Nov

HAPD and Electronics Updates

ATLAS muon spectrometer varia, status, and upgrades. Gerjan Bobbink Steenwijk 16-june-2017

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Nov 2015

A new Scintillating Fibre Tracker for LHCb experiment

T1 Electronic Design Review

Beam Test Results and ORCA validation for CMS EMU CSC front-end electronics N. Terentiev

SuperFRS GEM-TPC Development Status Report

BABAR IFR TDC Board (ITB): requirements and system description

Monolithic Thin Pixel Upgrade Testing Update. Gary S. Varner, Marlon Barbero and Fang Fang UH Belle Meeting, April 16 th 2004

Hamamatsu Silicon Sensors

The CALICE test beam programme

WBS Trigger. Wesley Smith, U. Wisconsin CMS Trigger Project Manager. DOE/NSF Review February 17, 1999

Detailed Design Report

The Cornell/Purdue TPC

Pixelated Positron Timing Counter with SiPM-readout Scintillator for MEG II experiment

THE OPERATION OF A CATHODE RAY TUBE

Sensors for the CMS High Granularity Calorimeter

Synchronization of the CMS Cathode Strip Chambers

The hybrid photon detectors for the LHCb-RICH counters

An extreme high resolution Timing Counter for the MEG Upgrade

Large Size GEM for Super Bigbite Spectrometer (SBS) Polarimeter for Hall A 12 GeV program at JLab

Data Quality Monitoring in the ATLAS Inner Detector

The LEP Superconducting RF System

Requirements for the Beam Abort Magnet and Dump

Report from the Tracking and Vertexing Group:

Tracking Detector R&D at Cornell University and Purdue University

Advanced Front End Signal Processing Electronics for ATLAS CSC System: Status And Post Production Performance.

Test beam data analysis for the CMS CASTOR calorimeter at the LHC

Commissioning the TAMUTRAP RFQ cooler/buncher. E. Bennett, R. Burch, B. Fenker, M. Mehlman, D. Melconian, and P.D. Shidling

Muon Forward Tracker. MFT Collaboration

Compact Muon Solenoid Detector (CMS) & The Token Bit Manager (TBM) Alex Armstrong & Wyatt Behn Mentor: Dr. Andrew Ivanov

Results on 0.7% X0 thick Pixel Modules for the ATLAS Detector.

Physics Requirements for the CXI Ion Time-of-Flight

THE OPERATION OF A CATHODE RAY TUBE

Status of CMS Silicon Strip Tracker

WBS Trigger. Wesley Smith, U. Wisconsin CMS Trigger Project Manager. DOE/NSF Review April 11, 2000

LHC Physics GRS PY 898 B8. Trigger Menus, Detector Commissioning

GEM-TPC development in Canada. Dean Karlen Technology recommendation panel meeting January 16, 2006 KEK

SciFi A Large Scintillating Fibre Tracker for LHCb

Upgrading LHC Luminosity

Transcription:

1 Review of the CMS muon detector system E. Torassa a a INFN sez. di Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy The muon detector system of CMS consists of 3 sub detectors, the barrel drift tube chambers (DTs), the end cap cathode strip chambers (CSCs) and the resistive plate chambers (RPCs). During the last years the layouts of the sub detectors have been optimized by testing several prototypes. Now the project is frozen and the mass production of the chambers has started. Several production centers are coordinating their efforts. The muon system will be completed within September 2005. The final detectors, the construction status and planning and some test of the produced chambers will be presented. 1. Physics goals The goal of the muon detector system is to identify and reconstruct muons in every relevant events where muons or decay into muons are involved. At LCH the first goal is the SM Higgs discovery. A gold plated signal of the Higgs boson is the four lepton channel H ZZ(ZZ ) 4l ± having relevant significance for the Higgs mass range 130 GeV m H 650 GeV. Other physics searches with muons are the SUSY Higgs decays h, H, A µ + µ and the superpartners decays q, g multilepton + multijet + Et miss. order of 120 250 µm to get a track segment precision of 75 µm (for ME1/1 and ME1/2) and 150 µm(for the others) with the consequence to be under the multiple scattering contribution up to p T = 100 GeV. RPCs measure 6 φ points (4 in the endcap) along 1 muons track segment. The goal is to identify muons, estimate their p T and provide an additional trigger signal for the barrel and endcap regions. The muon detector system is described in detail in the Technical Design Report [1], the latest upgrades are described in the Engineering Design Reports. 2. Muon detector system The muon detector system of CMS consists of 3 sub detectors, the barrel drift tube chambers (DTs), the end cap cathode strip chambers (CSCs) and the resistive plate chambers (RPCs). DTs measure 8 φ and 4 θ points along 4 muons track segments in the barrel region. The goal is to identify muons, measure charge and momentum and identify the bunch crossing associated to every muon track. The single point resolution must be of the order of 250 µm to get a track segment precision of about 100 µm with the consequence to be under the multiple scattering contribution up to p T = 200 GeV. CSCs measure 6 φ and 6 θ points along 4 muons track segments in the endcap region. The goal is the same as DT. The single point resolution must be of the Figure 1. The muon system layout.

2 The endcap consists of 4 disks along the beam divided in 2 or 3 wheels and 18 or 36 sectors. The barrel consists of 5 wheels along the beam divided in 4 stations (shells) and 12 sectors (S1-S12). More details can be found in [2]. 3. Barrel Drift Tubes Chambers The Barrel DT Muon Detector consists of four station of chambers called MB1-MB4. The chamber dimensions range from 2 2.5 m 2 for the innermost station (MB1) to 4 2.5 m 2 for the outermost one (MB4). The sharing of the 250 chambers between the 4 different production sites is shown in Fig. 2. Figure 3. DT chamber and superlayer. The strips placed at the center of the cell above and below the wire are field shaping electrodes, they improve the linearity of the spacetime relationship. The working conditions are Ar CO 2 (85 15%) for the gas, V wire = 3600 V, V strip = 1800 V, V cathode = 1200 V at 970 mbar for the electrodes, Q th = 5 fc for the charge threshold. Figure 2. DT chambers production sharing. The chambers are made of three different suplerlayers (SL) glued together and to a thick honeycomb plate providing stiffness and support for the chamber (Fig. 3). The wires in the two outer superlayers (SL1,SL3) are parallel to the beam line in the CMS reference. In the inner quadruplet (SL2), the wires are orthogonal to the beam line. In each SL there are four layers of parallel drift tubes. The cells are staggered by half of the pitch to improve the efficiency of the chamber and to reduce the left-right ambiguity. The sketch of the final cell is shown in Fig. 4. Some modification in the cell design was introduced in 1999 to increase the mechanical strength of superlayers and to optimize the electronic segmentation. Figure 4. Sketch of the DT cell showing drift lines and isochrones. Chambers and SLs are tested in every site following a test procedure described in the Quality Check (QC) document. Several parameters are measured, they must be inside a specific range. When a parameter is out of range the recovering

3 procedure starts. Required measurement are i.e. wire tension and position, currents, gas tightness, noise efficiency and resolution for every cell. The number of disconnected cells is about 0.3%, the number of noisy cells (noise > 500 Hz) is about 0.5% with a global limit of 1%. The pressure drop time constant (defined as the time needed for the overpressure to be reduced by a factor 1/e) is larger than 1000 min with a QC limit of 135 min. The chamber performance has been studied with a test beam using the last chamber prototype [2] and the first produced chamber. A new test beam is foreseen in May 2003 with the 25 nsec bunched beam. In the best conditions (straight tracks and zero magnetic field) the single cell resolution is 170 µm (3 nsec) and the efficiency is 99.8%. Every chamber is tested with cosmic rays to check that every cell works with the expected efficiency, time spectrum and resolution. The plot in Fig. 5 describes the DT chamber production planning and achievement. The production started in April 2001 and will be completed by September 2005 with a rate of 18 DT/site/year. chamber the second in December 2002 with two chambers (MB1,MB3). 4. Endcap Cathode Strip Chambers The CSC Endcap Detector consists of four disks of chambers called ME1-ME4. In the different rings they are called (i.e. for disk 1) ME1/1- ME1/3. The sharing of the 540 chambers (432 without the staged ME4) between the different production sites is shown in Fig. 6. Figure 6. CSC chambers production sharing. Figure 5. DT chambers production planning (all the sites). At end 2002 the number of built chambers is 60 (24% of the full production) and 19 where sent to CERN. Two installation tests were successfully performed the first in August 2002 with one MB2 Figure 7. CSC endcap and single chamber. Chambers are trapezoidal shaped, they cover

4 10 0 or 20 0 sectors. The length of chambers is between 1.7 m (ME1/1) to 3.4 m (ME234/2). A full endcap with a single CSC chamber is shown in Fig. 7. Every chamber consists of 6 planes. Every plane is a multiwire proportional chamber in which one cathode plane is segmented into strips perpendicular to the wires. Strips run radially with a width ranging from 3 to 8 mm in the bottom side and from 8 to 16 mm in the top side for different chambers. Wires are spaced by 3.2 mm ganged in groups of 5-16. A single CSC gas gap plane is shown in Fig. 8 in two different cross sections. The working conditions are Ar/CO 2 /CF 4 (40/50/10%) for the gas, V wire = 3600 V at 970 mbar for the anode voltage. In the best conditions the single layer resolution is 50 µm. Figure 9. CSC chambers production planning in the USA sites. 5. Resistive Plate Chambers Figure 8. CSC single plane in two different cross sections. At the end of 2002 considering every production sites 280 chambers were built (65% of the full production) and 45 were sent to the CERN. The plot in Fig. 9 describes the CSC chamber production planning and achievement (up to September 2002) in the USA production sites. The full production of the CSC chambers will be completed at the end of 2003. The RPC detector (Fig. 10) covers both the forward and the barrel regions. Every DT or CSC chamber has 1 or 2 RPC chambers close to it in the front or backward surface (both surfaces in MB1 and MB2). In the barrel region the chambers are called RB1-RB4. The 480 chambers, 120 in every station, are under construction in two sites (Bari and General Tecnica) and two other sites (Sofia and Naples) will start in 2003. In the forward region the chambers are called RE1-RE4. The total number of RE chambers is 756 but 50% of them has been staged (RE1/2, RE1/3, RE2/2, RE3/2, RE4/2), the construction will start in 2003 in three production sites. An RPC consists of two resistive electrodes divided by a small gap. The electrodes are parallel plates made of phenolic resin (bakelite)with a bulk resistivity of 1 2 10 10 Ω/cm. The outer surface of the bakelite is coated with conductive graphite to form the HV and the ground electrodes. Aluminum strips are laid down to one surface, separated from the graphite coating by a PET film. The avalanche is created inside the gap and the charge is induced on the strips. The detector can operate in streamer or avalanche modes, for the higher rate capability the avalanche mode is used. Resistive electrodes are necessary to prevents surface sparking damages.

5 The resistivity must be optimized considering it contributes to the drop of voltage produced by the current through the plates (V d rate ρ). The time performance is related to the gap width. The section of the RPC chamber is shown in Fig. 11. The double gap is used to improve efficiency and resolution. The gap width is 2 mm, the strip width is 35 mm, the operating H.V. is about 9.0 kv and the gas is C 2 H 2 F 4 ic 4 H 10 (95% 5%). The time resolution is less than 3 nsec. The production and test rate for the RB chambers is 10 chamber/month/site. The production planning for the first 200 chambers is described in Tab. 1. The production rate for the endcap (RE) will be 12 chamber/month/site. Figure 10. RPC detector, two sectors for the barrel and one 20 0 sector for the forward regions. Table 1 RB chambers production planning. 25 RB3 end September 2002 25 RB1 end January 2003 25 RB2 end March 2003 25 RB4 end April 2003 2 Wheels January 2004 6. Installation The installation planning of DT and barrel RPC (they are attached together) is the following: Figure 11. Section of the RPC double gap. Table 2 DT-RB installation planning. YB0 YB+2 S8-S12 Sep-Dec 2003 YB-1 S8-S9 Sep-Dec 2003 YB0 S2-S6 YB-2 S8-S9 Jan-March 2004 YB+1 S8-S12 Jan-March 2004 YB+1 YB+2 S2-S6 Sept-Nov 2004 YB-1 S10-S12 Sept-Nov 2004 YB-1 S2-S6, YB-2 April-June 2005 S1 S7 after Aug 2005

6 The installation of CSC will be done during 2003 and 2004. Forward RPC will be available very late with respect to CSC but they have the advantage to be decoupled from them. 7. Conclusions The CMS muon system has been designed to achieve the LHC physics goals. The required performances were obtained with detector prototypes and were confirmed with the produced chambers. The production status at end of 2002 is DT 24%, CSC 65%, RPC B 8%. The small shortage with respect to the planning is compatible with the installation planning. Acknowledgments The author would like to thank the project leaders of the CMS muon detectors Prof. F. Gasparini (DT), G. Mitselmakher (CSC) and P. Iaselli (RPC) for their support in preparing the results for this report. REFERENCES 1. The CMS Muon Project, Thechnical Design Report, CERN/LHCC 97-32. 2. M. Aguilar-Benitez et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 480 (2002) 658.