Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Similar documents
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the. Federal Communications Commission. Washington, DC

FCC Releases Proposals for Broadcast Spectrum Incentive Auctions

Before the. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC In the Matter of ) ) Review of the Emergency Alert System ) EB Docket No.

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Reply Comments of The Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. and The National Association of Broadcasters

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER. Adopted: October 21, 2015 Released: October 22, 2015

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

July 6, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF PCIA THE WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FCC & 600 MHz Spectrum Update. Ben Escobedo Sr. Market Development

Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The American Cable Association ( ACA ) hereby submits these comments in

REPLY COMMENTS OF THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, CBS CORPORATION, VIACOM, INC., NEWS CORPORATION, TIME WARNER INC., AND UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

COMMENTS OF THE COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (CCIA)

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C REPLY COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554

Hearing on Crafting a Successful Incentive Auction: Stakeholders Perspectives. United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) In the Matter of ) ) Sports Blackout Rules ) MB Docket No.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

April 7, Via Electronic Filing

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPPOSITION OF PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington DC 20554

GET YOUR FREQ ON. A Seminar on Navigating the Wireless Spectrum Upheaval

BY ELECTRONIC FILING. March 25, 2009

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Response to the "Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band" Canada Gazette, Part I SLPB December, Submitted By: Ontario Limited

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Reply Comments from the Canadian Association of Broadcasters

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF SHURE INCORPORATED

Present & Future Opportunities for WISPs to Obtain Access to Additional Spectrum

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Expanding the Economic and Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum Through Incentive Auctions, WT Docket No

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Boulder Thinking About The Incentive Auction

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF T-MOBILE USA, INC.

August 7, Legal Memorandum

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) COMMENTS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INITIAL COMMENTS OF THE WMTS COALITION

Figure 1: U.S. Spectrum Configuration

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE WMTS COALITION

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Guide to Wireless Microphone Operation. Post FCC 600 MHz Incentive Auction. By Joe Ciaudelli Sennheiser Electronic Corporation

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) In the Matter of ) WC Docket No Rural Call Completion ) )

LESSONS FROM THE US INCENTIVE AUCTION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

TV Spectrum Update National Translator Association Annual Meeting May 2013

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

March 10, Re: Notice of Ex parte presentation in MB Docket No.07-57

TV Translator Relocation Grant Program

Legal Memorandum. In this issue, link to information about. Developments: FCC Proposes New Video Description Rules. April 29, 2016

Statement of the National Association of Broadcasters

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1 COPYRIGHT 2012 ALCATEL-LUCENT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE SATELLITE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

June 26, Ex Parte Comments of MLB, NASCAR, NBA, NCAA, NFL, NHL, The PGA TOUR, and ESPN as members of the SPORTS TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE

Hearing on Future of Emergency Alerting. United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce

Transcription:

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Promoting Spectrum Access for Wireless ) GN Docket No. 14-166 Microphone Operations ) ) Expanding the Economic and Innovation ) GN Docket No. 12-268 Opportunities of Spectrum Through Incentive ) Auctions ) COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS The National Association of Broadcasters ( NAB ) 1 submits these comments in response to the Commission s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the above proceedings. 2 NAB appreciates the FCC s inquiry and its efforts to find new spectrum opportunities for wireless microphones. Given the scope of displacement that has already occurred, and the additional displacement that the FCC s decisions concerning the incentive auction will create, it is critical for the FCC to immediately identify new bands on which wireless microphones may operate. We urge the Commission to conclude this proceeding as quickly as possible and, in particular, to authorize new bands for wireless 1 The National Association of Broadcasters is a nonprofit trade association that advocates on behalf of free local radio and television stations and broadcast networks before Congress, the Federal Communications Commission and other federal agencies, and the courts. 2 Promoting Spectrum Access for Wireless Microphone Operations, Expanding the Economic Opportunities of Spectrum Through Incentive Auctions, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, GN Docket No. 14-166, GN Docket No. 12-268, FCC 14-145 (rel. Sept. 30, 2014) ( Wireless Microphone NPRM ).

microphone operations before the commencement of the incentive auction to ensure that wireless microphone users are able to transition their operations. DISCUSSION Wireless microphones are currently permitted to operate on two reserved channels, amounting to 12 megahertz of exclusive spectrum. These two channels were reserved as part of a compromise during the TV white spaces proceeding, as broadcasters lost exclusive access to between 10 and 20 channels in most major markets, and the Commission recognized that the TV white spaces database could not adequately protect newsgathering operations. 3 As NAB previously explained, the Commission s decision to eliminate these two reserved channels following the incentive auction and repacking will significantly harm broadcasters newsgathering operations and the viewing public. 4 This loss is compounded by the FCC s unfortunate decision to allow both wireless microphone and unlicensed operations in the duplex gap, which severely diminishes the utility of this spectrum for wireless microphone operations. 5 Further, the FCC s current proposal to relocate some television stations to the duplex gap during the repacking process makes this situation even worse; in markets where television stations are relocated in the duplex gap, broadcasters will have no exclusive spectrum on which they can rely to cover 3 In the Matter of Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands, Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, 25 FCC Rcd 18661, 132 (2010). 4 See, e.g., Comments of the National Association of Broadcasters at 47-48, GN Docket No. 12-268 (filed Jan. 25, 2013); Reply Comments of the National Association of Broadcasters at 56-57, GN Docket No. 12-268 (filed March 12, 2013). 5 Expanding the Economic and Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum Through Incentive Auctions, Report and Order, 29 FCC Rcd 6567, 314 (2014). 2

breaking news using wireless microphones. 6 These Commission decisions have completely eliminated any reliable reserved spectrum for wireless microphone operations, despite the undisputed fact that wireless microphones remain essential to broadcasters and programming production, and critical to covering breaking news events. Wireless microphones used for these purposes must have low latency and high quality. Most importantly, they must have spectrum on which they can reliably operate. It is imperative that the Commission move as quickly as possible to identify spectrum to which wireless microphones can relocate. In particular, we urge the Commission to take two specific steps. First, consistent with the Commission s stated intention, the FCC must issue an order in this proceeding identifying as many new bands as possible for use by wireless microphones before the incentive auction commences. 7 Wireless microphone users will need time to transition to new bands, particularly given the expense associated with their previous transition out of the 700 MHz band. Just as importantly, they will need equipment that will actually function in these bands. Wireless microphone equipment that will operate in most of the bands the Commission proposes in this proceeding is not yet widely available, and will take time to develop. Second, the Commission should allow wireless microphones to continue to operate in the 600 MHz band until winning forward auction bidders are actually ready to deploy in the area and the Commission has identified alternative bands to which wireless 6 Comment Sought on Competitive Bidding Procedures for Broadcast Incentive Auction 1000, Including Auctions 1001 and 1002, Public Notice, AU Docket No. 14-252, GN Docket No. 12-268, FCC 14-191, 35 (rel. Dec. 17, 2014). 7 Wireless Microphone NPRM at 2 ( Our goal here is to issue an order in this proceeding before the commencement of the incentive auction. ) 3

microphone operations can relocate. Currently, the Commission proposes to allow wireless microphones to continue to operate in the 600 MHz band for a period following the auction, but must cease operations no later than 39 months after the auction. There is no reason to require wireless microphones to cease operations until the spectrum on which they operate is actually put to use by wireless carriers. NAB further observes that the Commission controls the timing for the conclusion of this proceeding and the identification of additional new bands for wireless microphone operations. Having essentially eliminated reserved spectrum for wireless microphones, the Commission should not evict wireless microphones from their current home before ensuring they have somewhere to go. CONCLUSION In jettisoning wireless microphones from reserved channels, the Commission ostensibly provided new reserved spectrum in the duplex gap. Now, the Commission has proposed that even that small sliver of spectrum may not be available, because television stations may be relocated to the duplex gap during repacking. While the FCC professes to understand the importance of wireless microphones, the reality is that no spectrum user has lost more and gained less in this proceeding than wireless microphones. NAB urges the Commission to conclude this proceeding and identify as many new bands for wireless microphones as possible before the incentive auction begins, and to allow wireless microphones to continue to operate in the 600 MHz band until the Commission has identified such alternative bands and wireless carriers are prepared to deploy. 4

Respectfully submitted, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS 1771 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 429-5430 Rick Kaplan Jerianne Timmerman Patrick McFadden Bruce Franca Robert Weller February 4, 2015 5