TESLA FEL-Report

Similar documents
Photoinjector Laser Operation and Cathode Performance

Simulations on Beam Monitor Systems for Longitudinal Feedback Schemes at FLASH.

RUNNING EXPERIENCE OF FZD SRF PHOTOINJECTOR

Design Studies For The LCLS 120 Hz RF Gun Injector

The FLASH objective: SASE between 60 and 13 nm

New Filling Pattern for SLS-FEMTO

Summary of the 1 st Beam Line Review Meeting Injector ( )

BUNCH-COMPRESSOR TRANSVERSE PROFILE MONITORS OF THE SwissFEL INJECTOR TEST FACILITY

First Results and Future of the Photo Injector Test Facility at DESY Zeuthen PITZ. introduction first measurements future schedule

PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Longitudinal phase space monitors for the ILC injectors and bunch compressors

Current status of XFEL/SPring-8 project and SCSS test accelerator

Characterizing Transverse Beam Dynamics at the APS Storage Ring Using a Dual-Sweep Streak Camera

4.4 Injector Linear Accelerator

THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER TEST ACCELERATOR: STATUS AND RESULTS * Abstract

TITLE PAGE. Title of paper: PUSH-PULL FEL, A NEW ERL CONCEPT Author: Andrew Hutton. Author Affiliation: Jefferson Lab. Requested Proceedings:

Photo cathode RF gun -

Report on the LCLS Injector Technical Review

P. Emma, et al. LCLS Operations Lectures

Screen investigations for low energetic electron beams at PITZ

High Rep Rate Guns: FZD Superconducting RF Photogun

Beam Instrumentation for X-ray FELs

Linac 4 Instrumentation K.Hanke CERN

AN OPTICAL AND TERAHERTZ INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEM AT THE FAST LINAC AT FERMILAB*

Tutorial: Trak design of an electron injector for a coupled-cavity linear accelerator

Intra-train Longitudinal Feedback for Beam Stabilization at FLASH

ELYSE An Intense Electron Linac for Pulsed Radiolysis Research

The basic parameters of the pre-injector are listed in the Table below. 100 MeV

RF considerations for SwissFEL

Linac-Beam Characterizations at 600 MeV Using Optical Transition Radiation Diagnostics *

SIMULTANEOUS OPERATION OF THREE LASER SYSTEMS AT THE FLASH PHOTOINJECTOR

First operation of cesium telluride photocathodes in the TTF injector RF gun

Results of recent photocathode studies at FLASH. S. Lederer, S. Schreiber DESY. L. Monaco, D. Sertore, P. Michelato INFN Milano LASA

Summary report on synchronization, diagnostics and instrumentation

Beam Instrumentation for CTF3 and CLIC

Status of RF Power and Acceleration of the MAX IV - LINAC

CBF500 High resolution Streak camera

Jefferson Lab Experience with Beam Halo, Beam Loss, etc.

STATUS OF THE SWISSFEL C-BAND LINEAR ACCELERATOR

EUROFEL-Report-2007-DS EUROPEAN FEL Design Study

LCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems

An Overview of Beam Diagnostic and Control Systems for AREAL Linac

Summary of recent photocathode studies

Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation

Activities on FEL Development and Application at Kyoto University

CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3

Non-Invasive Energy Spread Monitoring for the JLAB Experimental Program via Synchrotron Light Interferometers

Production of quasi-monochromatic MeV photon in a synchrotron radiation facility

A HIGH POWER LONG PULSE HIGH EFFICIENCY MULTI BEAM KLYSTRON

Digital BPMs and Orbit Feedback Systems

3 cerl. 3-1 cerl Overview. 3-2 High-brightness DC Photocathode Gun and Gun Test Beamline

Status of CTF3. G.Geschonke CERN, AB

Spontaneous Emission High Gain Harmonic Generation Free Electron Laser

Present Status and Future Upgrade of KEKB Injector Linac

LCLS Injector Technical Review

Diamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes

STATUS OF THE SwissFEL C-BAND LINAC

High QE Photocathodes lifetime and dark current investigation

Drive Laser Operations

5 Project Costs and Schedule

JLab 10kW FEL Driver Beam Diagnostics

DARK CURRENT IN SUPERCONDUCTING RF PHOTOINJECTORS MEASUREMENTS AND MITIGATION

RECENT PROGRESS IN UPGRADE OF THE HIGH INTENSITY THzzz zz-fel AT OzSAKzA UNIVERSITYzzzz

STATUS OF THE EUROPEAN XFEL

Start to End Simulations

COMMISSIONING AND FIRST RESULTS OF THE ELECTRON BEAM PROFILER IN THE MAIN INJECTOR AT FERMILAB*

CERN S PROTON SYNCHROTRON COMPLEX OPERATION TEAMS AND DIAGNOSTICS APPLICATIONS

Soft x-ray optical diagnostics, concepts and issues for NGLS

Research and Development on Superconducting Radio-Frequency Technology for Electron Linear Accelerators. Deliverable

30 GHz Power Production / Beam Line

STATUS REPORT ON THE COMMISSIONING OF THE JAPANESE XFEL AT SPRING-8

KARA and FLUTE RF Overview/status

Technology Challenges for SRF Guns as ERL Sources in View of Rossendorf work

Photocathodes FLASH: Quantum Efficiency (QE)

Demonstra*on of Two- color XFEL Opera*on and Autocorrela*on Measurement at SACLA

Future Performance of the LCLS

Cathode Studies at FLASH: CW and Pulsed QE measurements

The Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation

CLIC FEASIBILITY DEMONSTRATION AT CTF3

TWO BUNCHES WITH NS-SEPARATION WITH LCLS*

Beam Losses During LCLS Injector Phase-1 1 Operation

Studies on an S-band bunching system with hybrid buncher

Suppression of Timing drift between laser and electron beam driven photo-cathode RF gun

NEW ELLIPSOIDAL LASER AT THE UPGRADED PITZ FACILITY

Accelerator Instrumentation RD. Monday, July 14, 2003 Marc Ross

Precision measurements of beam current, position and phase for an e+e- linear collider

Status of the X-ray FEL control system at SPring-8

INFN School on Electron Accelerators. RF Power Sources and Distribution

PEP II Design Outline

November 5,1999. The NLC Injector UCRL-JC

COMMISSIONING OF A DUAL-SWEEP STREAK CAMERA WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE ASTA PHOTOINJECTOR DRIVE LASER*

THE PHYSICS AND APPLICATIONS OF HIGH BRIGHTNESS BEAMS: WORKING GROUP C SUMMARY ON APPLICATIONS TO FELS *

Mechanical aspects, FEA validation and geometry optimization

An Operational Diagnostic Complement for Positrons at CEBAF/JLab

PHIN. Report on the Development of a Radio-Frequency Photo Electron Source with Superconducting Niobium Cavity (SRF Gun Realization)

TTF / VUV-FEL. Schedule 2005 and Project Management Issues. Schedule 2005 Project Organisation Budget & Controlling

High Brightness Injector Development and ERL Planning at Cornell. Charlie Sinclair Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics

Development of an Abort Gap Monitor for High-Energy Proton Rings *

Detailed Design Report

Beam Diagnostics for the BNL Energy Recovery Linac Test Facility

TTF2 (TESLA Test Facility, Phase 2) VUV FEL (Vacuum-Ultraviolet Free-Electron Laser)

Transcription:

Determination of the Longitudinal Phase Space Distribution produced with the TTF Photo Injector M. Geitz a,s.schreiber a,g.von Walter b, D. Sertore a;1, M. Bernard c, B. Leblond c a Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, D 603 Hamburg, Germany b RWTH Aachen, D 5056 Aachen, Germany c Laboratoire de l'accélérateur Lineaire, F 91405 Orsay, France Abstract The longitudinal phase space distribution of the beam produced with the rf photo injector of the TESLA Test Facility at DESY is mainly determined by the longitudinal laser pulse shape and the compression due to the rf acceleration field in the rf gun. The longitudinal electron distribution is measured with a high resolution streak camera using synchrotron radiation at the spectrometer dipole (E = MeV). The same streak camera is used to measure the UV laser pulse shape. The longitudinal distribution of the laser and the electron beam can alternatively be determined by Fourier transform spectroscopy. The energy spread of the beam is determined by measuring the beam profile in the dispersive section using optical transition radiation. Dephasing of the superconducting accelerating cavities and variation of bunch compression parameters allow further measurements of the longitudinal phase space distribution. 1. Introduction Since late 1998, the new photo injector [1] based on a laser driven rf gun and a superconducting accelerating cavity is in operation at the TESLA Test Facility at DESY []. The injector is used to perform experiments with high bunch charges related to beam dynamics in accelerating structures, and to serve as an injector for high peak current, low emittance bunches to drive the free electron laser. The beam is injected into the first accelerating module, a string of eight TESLA su- 1 on leave from INFN LASA, Milano, Italy perconducting accelerating cavities. The module is followed by a magnetic chicane bunch compressor[3], a second accelerating module, and a dipole magnet for energy measurements. One important beam property is the longitudinal electron bunch shape. Peak currents of.5 ka as required for the TTF-FEL phase can only be reached, if the bunches with acharge of 1nC are compressed from initial 1 mm to 50 μm in the magnetic chicane bunch compressor [4]. For the proof-of-principle experiment, a bunch length of 50 μm is anticipated. In this report we present the measurement of the longitudinal profile of the beam produced by the injector with a high reso-

lution streak camera. The bunch length is determined by initial laser pulse shape and the relative phase of the gun to the laser. A second method is using Fourier transform spectroscopy. Proper dephasing the beam in the accelerating structure and the measurement of the energy spread in a dispersive section allow the reconstruction of the longitudinal pulse shape.. Streak Camera Measurements The longitudinal bunch charge distribution can be determined single-shot, time-domain with a high resolution a streak camera [5]. Synchrotron light, emitted by the electron bunch, is transmitted by a set of aluminum mirrors onto the photo cathode (S-0) of the streak camera. The light transfer is done without focusing lenses since the intensity suffices. In the streak tube, the light pulse is converted to an electron pulse, which is accelerated and swept transversely by a fast rf electric field. The resulting transverse distribution is projected onto a phosphor screen. The image is amplified by a multi-channel plate and then detected by a CCD camera (Fig. 1). interference filter Slit Photocathode Sweep Phosphor screen CCD Micro-channel plate Fig. 1. Principle layout of the streak camera used in this experiment. The streak camera has a temporal resolution of ps. Space charge effects inside the streak camera tube and the available sweeping speed of 5 ps/mm limit the temporal resolution. The transverse beam size of the electron bunch is convoluted with the longitudinal electron bunch distribution during the sweep. To reduce the effect to a minimum, a narrow slit with a width corresponding to ff =:61 ± 0:01 ps is used in streak direction. The slit size has been chosen large enough so that diffraction effects on the photo cathode can be neglected. The residual contribution of the transverse intensity distribution on the beam profile recorded by the streak camera has been deconvoluted during data analysis. The bunch length obtained from an rf gun depends on both the laser pulse length and the compression occurring from the rf field within the first centimeters of the gun cavity. By proper choice of the rf phase a velocity modulation can be impressed on the electron bunch leading to a reduction of its length within the gun cavity. Leading electrons see a lower electric field than trailing electrons to obtain pulse compression. Very short bunches can be obtained at the price of sacrificing a large fraction of the bunch charge. The bunch charge and length is reduced by choosing an rf phase such that only part of the electrons in the bunch are subject to an acceleration. In an electron drive linac the latter mechanism is generally avoided because of the need of intense electron beams. During this experiment, the electron bunches are accelerated in the linac with the maximum accelerating field without the use of the magnetic bunch compressor chicane yielding an invariant bunch length behind the injector. Synchrotron light generated in the TTF spectrometer dipole magnet located at the end of the linac has been used to determine the bunch length. The laser pulse length has been measured with the same streak camera. Since the laser beam has a wavelength of 6 nm, special UV transmitting optics have been used. Laser Pulse Length Measurements Averaged over several measurements, the laser pulse length in the UV is ff = 16:7 ± 1:7 ps. Figure shows an examples of longitudinal laser shapes. The unexpected long laser pulse (left) was due to a problem with the pulse train oscillator of the laser during this experiment. After replacing the laser head, a pulse length of ff =7:1±0:6 ps (right) was measured [6]. Electron Pulse Length Measurements Figure 3 (upper left and right) shows two examples of measured longitudinal electron bunch shapes using the streak camera. The rf gun was operated with a laser pulse length of 16 ps, a gradient of 35 MV/m and a bunch charge 3 nc. The shapes are fitted with a gaussian distribution as 6

Intensity (a.u.) 600 500 0 0 40 60 80 10140160180 Time (ps) Intensity (a.u.) 350 50 150 50 0 10 0 30 40 50 60 70 80 Time (ps) Fig.. Two examples of longitudinal laser bunch shapes measured with a streak camera in the UV (6 nm). The left shape is taken with the pulse train oscillator produced longer pulses than expected, the right shape is after repair. Indicated is a fit to a gaussian function giving a width of ff =17:81 ± 0:01 ps (left) and ff =8:0 ± 0:01 ps. indicated by the solid lines. The upper left profile has been obtained for a gun phase (relative phase between rf gun and laser) of 5 ffi yielding maximum bunch compression to ff z =1:95 ± 0:08 mm without a significant reduction of the bunch charge. Figure 3 (lower left) shows the measured bunch length as a function of rf phase. The bunch length determined by a simulation of the bunch dynamics in the rf gun using PARMELA [7] is indicated with a solid line. It fits well with the data and confirms the understanding of the bunch compression due to the rf field in the gun. Figure 3 (lower right) shows the rms bunch length Intensity [a.u.] 500 5 4 3 σ = (1.95 ± 0.08)mm z 6 10 14 18 Intensity [a.u.] 0 800 600 0 5 10 15 0 5 5 4 3 σ = (3.7 ± 0.06)mm z at a fixed gun phase 40 ffi butforavariable bunch charge. The bunch length does not change significantly for bunch charges smaller than 8 nc, corresponding to a beam current of 700 A. For bunch charges exceeding 8nC, a gradual lengthening is observed. This lengthening can be explained by longitudinal space charge forces whose strength is rising proportional to the bunch charge. At low energies, within the gun cavity, the strength of these additional forces suffice to enlarge the longitudinal beam dimension. 3. Energy Spread Measurement Injector Energy Spread The energy spread measured at a beam energy of 16 MeV in the dispersive section of the photo injector by means of optical transition radiation yields an rms energy spread of E=E =1:9 10 3.Together with the rms bunch length of ff z = mm a normalized longitudinal emittance of flffl z = 190 mm kev is obtained. Linac Energy Spread The evaluation of the bunch energy distribution in the dispersive section at the end of the linac can be used to determine the bunch length. For this experiment, the electron pulses are accelerated off-crest in the first accelerating module (longitudinal transfer matrix M), are longitudinally compressed by a magnetic chicane compressor (longitudinal dispersion M 56 ) and accelerated (eventually) off-crest by a the second module (longitudinal transfer matrix R). The final energy spread p μff 66 can be expressed in terms of the initial beam parameters, hence μff 66 = R 65~ff 55 +R 65 R 66 ~ff 56 + R 66~ff 66 + U A~ff 55(1) 165 155 145 135 15 RF Gun Phase [ o] 4 6 8 10 1 Average Beam Current [ma] where Fig. 3. Longitudinal electron bunch shapes measured with a streak camera for a gun phase of 5 ffi (upper left) and 40 ffi (upper right). The bunch length from a gaussian fit to the shapes is shown as a function of gun phase (lower left). The result of a simulation is indicated as a solid line. The lower right graph shows the bunch length for different bunch charges. ~ff 55 = ff 55 (1 + M 56 M 65 ) +ff 66 M56M 66+S AM 56ff () 55 ~ff 56 = ff 55 M65 +M 65M 56 +ff66 M66M 56 +SAM 56 ff(3) 55 ~ff 66 = ff 55 M 65+ff 66 M 66+S Aff 55 : (4) ff 55 and ff 66 denote the square of the initial rms bunch length and energy spread respectively. S A and U A denote the second order beam transfer 7

matrix elements of the off-crest rf acceleration S A = U A = 1 de cos ffi E 0 + de cos ffi ß (5) where de, ffi and denote the cavity gradient, phase and wavelength. During the measurements, the injector was operated with a reduced laser pulse length of 7 ps, a gun gradient of 35 MV/m and a reduced bunch charge of 1 nc. For this measurements, the machine setup is a comparable to the setup used for the streak camera measurements discussed in the previous section, because the longitudinal space charge forces are identical in both cases. Longitudinal space charge forces scale with the bunch charge and inverse to the square of the bunch length, hence the laser pulse length. The rf gun phase yielding the shortest bunch length in the injector, see Fig. 3, has been chosen. Measurements The energy spread measured behind the spectrometer dipole magnet, the phase and the gradient oftherfcavity strings have been used to determine the rms bunch length according to formulae (1-4). The result of a simulation, generating 10 5 possible ff 66 for varying cavity gradient, cavity phase, initial bunch length and energy spread, is compared with the measurement. The simulation data sample is cut for the measured energy spread and rf parameters (within their measurement errors) yielding the evolution of the bunch length through the machine. Figure 4 shows the FWHM bunch length evolving through the magnetic chicane compressor. The shaded area indicates the error of the bunch length measurement atvarious positions within the chicane. The left plot shows a set-up with optimum compression from ff z = (90±80) μm to the right plot an over-compression from ff z = (850 ± ) μm to ff z = (500 ± 180) μm. The result of the measurements agrees well with the streak camera measurements taken into account, that the laser pulse length was reduced by a factor of and at the same time, the contribution of longitudinal space charge forces during both measurements are identical. 4. Conclusion The longitudinal electron bunch shape has been measured as a function of the relative phase of the rf gun and the laser beam. The bunch length predicted by a simulation of the beam dynamics in the rf gun fits well with the measurement. This support our understanding of an rf compression in the gun for low phases. A second method to determine the longitudinal bunch shapeby measuring the bunch energy spread after the bunch traveled through accelerating modules and a magnetic chicane compressor allows to reconstruct the evolution of the bunch length throughout the linac. The results are in good agreement with the streak camera measurements. For optimum compression, an injector bunch length of ff z = (90 ± 80) μm and a final bunch length of ff z =(60± 50) μm is achieved. Length (FWHM) [mm].5 1.5 1 0.5 0 1 3 4 Compressor length [m] Length (FWHM) [mm].5 1.5 1 0.5 0 1 3 4 Compressor length [m] References [1] S. Schreiber, First Running Experience with the RF Gun based Injector of the Tesla Test Facility Linac", this conference. Fig. 4. FWHM bunch length through the magnetic chicane bunch compressor. The measured energy spread, rf cavity gradient and phase (within their error bars) are compared to a simulation with the initial bunch length and energy spread as free parameters. Left: Optimum compression. Right: Over-compression. The shaded area indicates the confidence of the bunch length measurement at various stages of compression. [] TESLA-Collaboration, ed. D.A. Edwards, TESLA Test Facility Linac Design Report", DESY Print March 1995, TESLA 95-01. [3] M. Geitz, A. Kabel, G. Schmidt, Bunch Compressor ", Proc. of the 1999 Part. Acc. Conf., New York, 1999. 8

[4] A VUV Free electron Laser at the TESLA Test Facility at DESY Conceptual Design Report", DESY Print, June 1995, TESLA-FEL 95-03. [5] ARP Streak Camera, now Photonetics GmbH, D-77694 Kehl, Germany. [6] S. Schreiber et al., Running Experience with the Laser System for the RF Gun based Injector at the Tesla Test Facility Linac", this conference. [7] PARMELA, Version 5.0, B. Mouton, LAL, F 91405 Orsay, France. 9