Ofcom s second public service broadcasting review Phase 2: preparing for the digital future - Response from Nickelodeon UK

Similar documents
Contestable PSB Funding: Delivering Diversity

Changes to BBC services second consultation on proposed changes to BBC Three, BBC One, BBC iplayer and CBBC

Joint submission by BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5, S4C, Arqiva 1 and SDN to Culture Media and Sport Committee inquiry into Spectrum

MID d ata data 2009 PSB Report 2010

Interim use of 600 MHz for DTT

Channel 4 submission to the BBC Trust s review of BBC services for younger audiences

Window of Creative Competition for Television BBC Trust review

BBC Trust Changes to HD channels Assessment of significance

Public Service Broadcasting Annual Report 2011

DIGITAL SWITCHOVER & THE BBC S ROLE

Submission to: A Future for Public Service Television: Content and Platforms in a Digital World - A Public Inquiry: Chaired by Lord Puttnam

The Scheduling of Television Advertising: Approaches to Enforcement. Response from the Commercial Broadcasters Association to Ofcom October 2014

BBC Trust service review The BBC s children s services

BBC Trust Service Reviews

FACTSHEET 4 Consumption of broadcast TV

FACTSHEET 1 TV Output

The new BBC Scotland Channel: Proposed variation to Ofcom s Operating Licence for the BBC s public services. BBC Response

Wales. BBC in the nations

Television access services report 2015

2 Television and audio-visual content Recent developments in Scotland

2. Television and audio visual

Reorganisation of the DTT LCN listing and changes to Digital UK s LCN Policy

The future of children s television programming

Ofcom review of public service television broadcasting. Phase 3 Competition for quality

Digital Switchover Management of Transition Coverage Issues Statement

Delivering Quality First consultation. Submission to BBC Trust from BBC Audience Council for Scotland. December 2011

The Future of Digital Terrestrial Television Enabling new services for viewers

Review of television production sector. Project terms of reference

Appendix 3. TV Viewing Data

Television channels required to provide television access services in 2019

National Association Of Broadcasters 1

Independent TV: Content Regulation and the Communications Bill 2002

The social and cultural purposes of television today.

Future pricing of spectrum used for terrestrial broadcasting A consultation

UKTV response to Ofcom consultation: Notice of proposed change to L-DTPS licence obligations of ESTV Limited (the local TV Licensee for London)

The BBC s services: audiences in Scotland

Television channels required to provide television access services in 2017

DTG Response to Ofcom Consultation: Licensing Local Television How Ofcom would exercise its new powers and duties being proposed by Government

Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Screen Australia s. Funding Australian Content on Small Screens : A Draft Blueprint

Response to Ofcom Consultation The future use of the 700MHz band. Response from Freesat. 29 August 2014

D PSB Audience Impact. PSB Report 2011 Information pack June 2012

Jersey Competition Regulatory Authority ( JCRA ) Decision M799/11 PUBLIC VERSION. Proposed Joint Venture. between. Scripps Networks Interactive Inc.

Department for Culture, Media and Sport. The balance of payments between television platforms and public service broadcasters

RESPONSE OF CHANNEL 5 BROADCASTING LTD TO OFCOM S CONSULTATION ON PROPOSED PROGRAMMING OBLIGATIONS FOR NEW CHANNEL 3 AND CHANNEL 5 LICENCES

The BBC s services: audiences in Northern Ireland

Operating licence for the BBC s UK Public Services

Reorganisation of the DTT LCN listing and changes to Digital UK s LCN Policy STATEMENT

Public Service Broadcasting Now and in the Future - Audience Attitudes. A report plus research appendix by Human Capital

PSB Annual Report 2015 PSB Audience Opinion Annex. Published July 2015

Arqiva Launching a TV channel on Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) Launching a TV channel on Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT)

Economics and Business Advanced Unit 4B: The Wider Economic Environment and Business

Ofcom s Annual Report on the BBC: 2017/18. Annex 2: BBC Performance Report

Context The broadcast landscape

Channel 4 response to House of Lords Select Committee on Communications inquiry into the British film and television industries

Australian Broadcasting Corporation. submission to. National Cultural Policy Consultation

Introduction. Introductory remarks

BBC Television Services Review

BBC S RELEASE POLICY FOR SECONDARY TELEVISION AND COMMERCIAL VIDEO-ON-DEMAND PROGRAMMING IN THE UK

BBC Fair Trading: BBC Studios use of BBC Brand

House of Lords Select Committee on Communications

The ABC and the changing media landscape

Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy

The Telecommunications Act Chap. 47:31

PSB Review 2008 Research findings

Media Examination Revision 2018

Digital Television Update Q4 2004

Ofcom's proposed guidance on regional production and regional programming

Channel 4 response to DMOL s consultation on proposed changes to the Logical Channel Number (LCN) list

Efficient, trusted, valued

BBC Trust. End of Charter Report. March March

REVIEW OF THE MANDATORY DAYTIME PROTECTION RULES IN THE OFCOM BROADCASTING CODE

Should AIP be applied to broadcasting spectrum? Report for the BBC and Channel 4

ITN concerns related to BBC s supply arrangements for the production of television content:

Maximising the benefits of 700 MHz clearance

BBC Response to Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games Draft Spectrum Plan

The Communications Market: Digital Progress Report

BBC tariff range of indicative prices for the supply of commissioned television programmes

RESPONSE FROM BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC ( BT ) TO DMOL S CONSULTATION ON PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE LOGICAL CHANNEL NUMBERS (LCN) LIST

The value of DTT. Alex Buchan, DTG Spectrum Summit 5 th July 2017

DIGITAL TELEVISION: MAINTENANCE OF ANALOGUE TRANSMISSION IN REMOTE AREAS PAPER E

Section 3. How well are the public service broadcasters delivering public purposes? The rumours of my death have been greatly exaggerated Mark Twain

King s Research Portal

Response to the Digital Dividend Review from Northern Visions/NvTv, 23 Donegall Street, Belfast BT1 2FF. Tel:

Public service broadcasting in the digital age. Supporting PSB for the next decade and beyond

In accordance with the Trust s Syndication Policy for BBC on-demand content. 2

B - PSB Audience Impact. PSB Report 2013 Information pack August 2013

AUSTRALIAN SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION AND RADIO ASSOCIATION

Submission to the Digital Dividend Green Paper

Institutes of Technology Next Steps

British Entertainment Industry Radio Group (BEIRG)

I R I S H M U S I C R I G H T S O R G A N I S A T I O N

Broadcasting Decision CRTC

Review of the cross-promotion rules Statement

S4C: An Independent Review

2 Television and audio-visual content Recent developments in Northern Ireland

A guide for. DTT schedule providers

Broadcast TV Technical Codes. Updates and amendments

Background Briefing Digital Switchover March 2009

Consultation on the allocation of LCN 7. Published: Wednesday, 16 December 2015

Coexistence of new services in the 800 MHz band with digital terrestrial television

Transcription:

Ofcom s second public service broadcasting review Phase 2: preparing for the digital future - Response from Nickelodeon UK Nickelodeon UK Nickelodeon UK is the No. commercial children s TV network in the UK. Launched in 993, it comprises six dedicated award-winning entertainment channels for children aged 2-2: Nickelodeon, NickToons, Nick Toonsters, Nick Jr., Nick Jr. 2 and Nick Replay plus Nick Jr on TMF available on Freeview. The Nickelodeon channels are available in over million cable & satellite homes and its websites receive almost 2 million visitors per month. 2 The company has built a diverse business by putting children first in everything it does and includes critically acclaimed and hugely popular television programming and production in the United Kingdom and around the world, plus consumer products, online, recreation and feature films. Existing provision of children s programming 3 Nickelodeon UK notes Ofcom s findings that pre-school and young children are found to be well-served by the range of current programming on offer. There is therefore no requirement for any further intervention by the Government to fund additional programming targeting these age groups, and we welcome the fact that this does not form an overt part of Ofcom s additional funding proposals in its current consultation. Nickelodeon UK also acknowledges Ofcom s well-documented finding that there is only a limited amount of UK-originated drama and factual programming for older children, and programming in general for young teenagers, on commercial or PSB television channels 2. This finding lies at the heart of Ofcom s conclusions from its recent review of the future of children s television programming as set out in Annex 0 to Phase of the PSB Review. 3 We also recognise that the commissioning of such programming by commercial broadcasters is unlikely to occur in significant quantities in the foreseeable future, given the risk and low financial return from these genres. The commitments from the BBC, Channel, SC and Five to increase the provision of content to older children and teenagers, as outlined in sections.22 to.26 of the consultation paper, is a welcome and important step in filling these gaps. Ofcom Research Report: The future of children s TV programming, 3 rd October 200 2 Section., PSB review Phase 2 consultation 3 Annex 0 to Phase One of Ofcom s second review of PSB, Statement, 0 th April 200

6 In Phase of its PSB review, Ofcom estimated that the cost of intervention in children s content to maintain current levels of reach and impact and achieve plurality of provision would be around 30m per annum. It is, however, unclear from the most recent consultation paper how this 30m figure relates to the new PSB commitments referenced in sections.22.26 of the consultation paper, and whether Ofcom still believes that 30m of additional funding is necessary over and above these. Further clarification on this point is important, in order to assess effectively the likely impact of Ofcom s proposals. A dditional funding for children s programmes 9 0 If any additional funding were to be made available to fill the identified gaps in children s programming, it is vital that these gaps be defined in detail, and analysis undertaken to ensure that they do not overlap and compete with existing commercial provision. To protect against further market distortion, funding should where possible be allocated to specifically identified programming and services which the market is failing to provide, rather than as a less clearly defined supplement to existing commercial PSBs children s programming budgets. Before recommending additional funding, it is vital that Ofcom identifies robust mechanisms and funding institutions that will ensure that additional funding continues to be spent on identified and confirmed gaps in provision, and does not overtime become subject to either commercial influence, nor a desire of the funding body itself to chase ratings. Furthermore, where gaps in the market come to be filled by commercial broadcasters, there should be a fair and effective process whereby funding provision is withdrawn in parallel to this. Nickelodeon UK strongly opposes the idea of raising additional PSB funding through industry levies. Such an approach would compound the financial pressures that commercial broadcasters are already facing as a result of the economic downturn, the decline in the TV advertising market, and the very significant drop in revenues as a result of HFSS food and drink advertising restrictions. This would in turn lead to a drop in programming investment, and possibly the closure of channels. If there is a perceived need for additional public service programming to meet society s needs then this should be funded by society as a whole, rather than through a punitive tax on a narrow section of UK industry. Ideally, if revenue is to be allocated to fill the gaps in children s programming, this should be taken from the existing licence fee, or through the diversion of funding away from existing PSB programming that competes directly with commercial services. 2

2 Nickelodeon also opposes the gifting of DTT spectrum to a particular broadcaster in return for additional children s programming commitments. As well as being inconsistent with Ofcom s preference for a market-led approach to the auction of the digital dividend, this would be a particularly inflexible and imprecise means of allocating resources to meet a range of specific children s public service content requirements. It would also be inconsistent with a competitive funding model, and the benefits that this would deliver in competition, quality and plurality of provision. As a means of stimulating children s programme production and incentivising the independent production sector, the proposal for a production tax credit has merit, given that it seeks to place funding in the hands of producers and does not favour any particular broadcaster. Any such approach would, however, need to be targeted at encouraging the production of children s programming to fill the identified gaps in public service provision, rather than stimulating the production of children s programming in general. C ompetitive funding 3 Nickelodeon UK believes that any additional funding that is made available for a specific children s service should be put out to tender to all broadcasters, rather than being allocated to existing PSB broadcasters. As such, we support Ofcom s refined competitive funding model where additional funding would be opened up to a wider pool of providers. The resulting additional competition is likely to lead to more efficient and higher quality productions, and to bring new private sector talent into the production process. Many commercial broadcasters have a wealth of expertise and experience in the delivery of particular genres of programming, and may be ideally placed to bring a fresh and creative approach to the provision of public service content. In this regard, we also note that Phase of the PSB review sets out three general principles of availability and access to PSB content, one of which indicates that the use of paid-for platforms and services to deliver some public service content could be appropriate if those platforms deliver greater reach or impact among a particular target audience than free-to-view platforms do. Nickelodeon welcomes this flexible approach to public service provision, and believes that its own channels provide an excellent example of how high reach and impact can be achieved among a specified target audience. Graphs and 2 attached clearly demonstrate this point. Graph shows that in 200 Nickelodeon (on cable and satellite platforms only) achieved a weekly reach of 6% of all children in all UK TV homes (with Nick Jr and Jr2 achieving 9%), compared to 2% for BBC Kids on Figure 3, PSB review Phase 2 consultation 3

BBC2, % for CITV channel and BBC Kids on BBC, 6% for T on C, % for Milkshake on Five and GMTV on ITV, and 2% for CITV on ITV. The only channels achieving a greater reach than Nickelodeon were CBBC and CBeebies. Broken down across different age ranges, it is also clear that Nickelodeon s weekly reach compares even more favourably with that achieved by the traditional PSBs in the higher age ranges, with Nickelodeon achieving the same reach as CBBC among children 3-. 6 Graph 2 has been included to demonstrate the weekly reach achieved by Nickelodeon in multichannel homes against that achieved by PSB channels in the same environment. While this is only part of the overall picture presented in Graph, it serves to underscore the strength of the Nickelodeon brand and children s underlying preferences when presented with a direct choice, and explains why Nickelodeon channels achieve such a high reach in all UK homes even though they are on cable and satellite platforms only. Clearly, there are a wide range of factors that any broadcaster would need to consider before bidding to provide a PSB service, including the level of funding on offer, the fit with existing programming and channel brand, and the impact on its wider commercial operations. In principle, however, all broadcasters should have the freedom to evaluate the opportunity on offer, and to bid if they so wish.

Graph YTD 200, weekly reach, + mins % of kids in all TV homes in the UK 2 2 2 6 3 3 2 2 9 9 9 6 6 3 3 3 9 3 CBBC CBeebies Nickelodeon BBC Kids on BBC2 CITV channel BBC Kids on BBC NICK JR & JR 2 Nicktoons T on C Milkshake on Five GMTV on ITV CITV on ITV Nicktoonsters 0 6 2 3 3 2 2 Children Children 0-2 Children 3- Adults 6-9 Source: BARB, Network Homes, K-, M-Su, 0600-3000 or appropriate daypart, Jan-Nov 200 NB: This data does not include the 2-hour Nickelodeon slot on TMF on Freeview. Reach data for Nickelodeon channels reflects cable and satellite distribution only.

Graph 2 YTD 200, weekly reach, + mins % of kids in all cable and satellite TV homes in the UK 2 33 9 2 Nickelodeon CBeebies Nicktoons CBBC NICK JR & JR 2 CITV Channel BBC Kids on BBC BBC Kids on BBC2 T on C Milkshake on Five GMTV on ITV CITV on ITV Nicktoonsters 3 6 6 3 2 3 2 2 2 0 0 Children Children 0-2 Children 3- Adults 6-9 Source: BARB, C+S Homes, K-, M-Su, 0600-3000 or appropriate daypart, Jan-Nov 200 2 NB: This data does not include the 2-hour Nickelodeon slot on TMF on Freeview. Reach data for Nickelodeon channels reflects cable and satellite distribution only. 6