Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

Similar documents
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PUBLIC NOTICE MEDIA BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE VIDEO DESCRIPTION MARKETPLACE TO INFORM REPORT TO CONGRESS. MB Docket No.

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C REPLY COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

Accessible Emergency Information (TV Crawls)

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

March 10, Re: Notice of Ex parte presentation in MB Docket No.07-57

Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The American Cable Association ( ACA ) hereby submits these comments in

Resolution Calling on the FCC to Facilitate the DTV Transition through Additional Consumer Education Efforts

January 11, Re: Notice of Ex parte presentation in MB Docket No.07-57

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF PCIA THE WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

In this document, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved, for a

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Title VI in an IP Video World

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

No IN THE ~uprem~ ~ourt o[ ~ ~n~b. CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Petitioner, V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL., Respondents.

Term Sheet Reflecting the Agreement of the ACCESS Committee Regarding In-Flight Entertainment November 21, 2016

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC In the Matter of ) ) Review of the Emergency Alert System ) EB Docket No.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS

[MB Docket Nos , ; MM Docket Nos , ; CS Docket Nos ,

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

ATSC 3.0 Next Gen TV ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE 1

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Evolution of STB. January Prepared for the CRE by

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

BEFORE THE Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Digital Television Transition in US

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

April 7, Via Electronic Filing

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPPOSITION OF PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

Before the. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the. Federal Communications Commission. Washington, DC

Re: GN Docket Nos , 09-51, ; CS Docket (Comments NBP Public Notice #27)

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

STAM~ AND RETURN US SANK/FCC JUN

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF NETFLIX, INC.

MAJOR COURT DECISIONS, 2009

July 6, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS

Regulatory Issues Affecting the Internet. Jeff Guldner

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF ITTA THE VOICE OF AMERICA S BROADBAND PROVIDERS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER AND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. of Comcast and Time-Warner ) )

INTELLIGENT CONTENT DELIVERY: THE KEY TO UNLOCKING THE FUTURE OF VIDEO SERVICES

(2) provide notice to the public about the availability of these features; and

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTER S WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE INDEPENDENT COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY OF SOUTH AFRICA S DISCUSSION DOCUMENT ON THE

Dynamic Ad Insertion. Metric Terms, Descriptions and Definitions

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF

Children s Television Programming Rules; Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

ADVISORY Communications and Media

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF FREE PRESS

BY ELECTRONIC FILING. March 25, 2009

AUSTRALIAN SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION AND RADIO ASSOCIATION

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., ET AL., AEREOKILLER LLC, ET AL.

TV EVERYWHERE /OTT CTVE

Frequently Asked Questions: Cable TV and Next Generation CAP EAS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Statement of the National Association of Broadcasters

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Agenda. ATSC Overview of ATSC 3.0 Status

Government Product Accessibility Template for Servers

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Federal Communications Commission

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC Digital Broadcast Content Protection MB Docket No

Voluntary Product Accessibility Template

NOTICE. (Formulated under the cognizance of the CTA R4 Video Systems Committee.)

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

ATSC Standard: 3D-TV Terrestrial Broadcasting, Part 1

Perspectives from FSF Scholars September 6, 2012 Vol. 7, No. 25

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) COMMENTS

April 9, Non-Dominant in the Provision of Switched Access Services, WC Docket No (filed Dec. 19, 2012).

Transcription:

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Accessible Emergency Information, and Apparatus Requirements for Emergency Information and Video Description: Implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 Video Description: Implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 MB Docket No. 12-107 MB Docket No. 11-43 COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY The Telecommunications Industry Association 1 ( TIA submits these comments in response to the Federal Communications Commission s ( Commission Further Notice of Proposed 1 TIA is a Washington, DC-based international trade association representing approximately 500 global information and communications technology ( ICT manufacturers, vendors, and suppliers. TIA represents the global ICT industry through standards development, advocacy, business opportunities, market intelligence and networking. TIA s member companies manufacture or supply the products and services used in global communications across all technology platforms. Since 1924, TIA has been enhancing the business environment for broadband, mobile wireless, information technology, networks, cable, satellite and unified communications. Members' products and services empower communications in every industry and market, including healthcare, education, security, public safety, transportation, government, the military, the environment and entertainment. TIA is accredited by the American National Standards Institute ( ANSI. TIA represents its members on the full range of public policy issues affecting the ICT industry and forges consensus on industry standards. Please see TIA s 2013 Policy Playbook, which provides an overview of the ICT market, technologies and policies that drive innovation and investment. See http://www.tiaonline.org/policy/tia-2013- playbook. 1

Rulemaking ( FNPRM in the above-referenced docket. 2 In the FNPRM, the Commission addresses the provision of linear programming to mobile and other devices; the provision of emergency information and video description services on mobile or other devices, tagging of the secondary audio stream, and customer support services. 3 More specifically, in the FNPRM, the Commission seeks input on whether an MVPD s video programing must include video description and emergency information when provided on mobile or other devices ( tablets, laptops, personal computers, smartphones, or similar devices. 4 The Commission s R&O applies only to devices that receive or play back traditional MVPD services in other words, devices such as set-top boxes, devices that function as set-top boxes, and television sets that receive linear video programming. 5 Consistent with the FNPRM, our discussion below encompasses non-traditional devices that receive or playback linear video programming such as laptops, tablets, smart phones, gaming consoles, and other computing devices. 2 Accessible Emergency Information, and Apparatus Requirements for Emergency Information and Video Description: Implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010; Video Description: Implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010, MB Docket Nos. 12-107; 11-43, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (rel. Apr. 8, 2013 ( FNPRM. 3 Pub. L. No. 111-260, 204, 124 Stat. 2751 (2010. See also Amendment of Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-265, 124 Stat. 2795 (2010. 4 FNPRM at par. 81. 5 That means, under the R&O, gaming consoles and PCs not designed as set-top box replacements would not need to display VD or EI since they do not directly receive the MVPD content but rather pass through the signals from other Section 203-covered devices. Therefore, only gaming consoles or PCs that have cable tuner cards or other similar hardware installed -- that replace a MVPD set-top box, receive and render the video stream, including VD/EI -- should be required to display VD/EI. 2

II. THE COMMISSION LACKS AUTHORITY TO APPLY VIDEO DESCRIPTION AND EMERGENCY INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS TO INTERNET-DELIVERED VIDEO PROGRAMMING CONTENT In the R&O, the Commission concluded that the emergency information rules do not apply to Internet protocol-delivered video programming, such as the programming provided by online video distributors ( OVDs. 6 We agree that Congress did not authorize the FCC to apply video description or emergency information requirements to over-the-top ( OTT Internet protocol-delivered programming, but allows for study of technical and operational issues, costs, and benefits of applying video description to Internet protocol-delivered programming. 7 We believe this is an appropriate finding for feasibility reasons as well, as it is technically challenging to apply these requirements to Internet protocol-delivered video from OTT providers. The Commission has already noted geographic alerting issues, 8 and the Video Programming Accessibility Advisory Committee ( VPAAC noted no applicable technical standards exist. 9 Issues also exist with the timing of these alerts as it would not be reasonable to require non-linear programming to include local information about a current emergency 6 7 8 See R&O at par. 8. See 47 USC 613(f(3(B. R&O at FN 28 ( We also note that Section 79.2(b(2 applies the rule to emergency information primarily intended for distribution to an audience in the geographic area in which the emergency is occurring. 47 C.F.R. 79.2(b(2. Given this geographic limitation, applying the rule broadly to cover all IP-delivered video programming, regardless of location, may not serve a useful purpose for and may cause confusion to viewers in areas with no connection to the location of the emergency.. 9 Second Report of the Video Programming Accessibility Advisory Committee on the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 Access to Emergency Information, April 9, 2012, at 12. 3

because such programming is usually not delivered for specific geographic areas and is not designed to be viewed in real-time. 10 In the FNPRM, the Commission requests input on whether an MVPD system must comply with the video description rules when it permits its subscribers to access linear video programming via tablets, laptops, personal computers, smartphones, or similar devices. 11 TIA believes that in the event that the MVPD s programming is provided outside of the home setting and over the Internet, we believe it is similarly not subject to the CVAA since the FCC lacks authority to impose obligations on such IP-delivered video programming content. The Commission s video description and emergency information requirements are appropriately limited to the MVPD s traditional programming offered within the home, and that qualifies as linear video programming under Part 79.1 of the Commission s rules. III. VIDEO DESCRIPTION AND EMERGENCY INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PERSONAL COMPUTERS, SMARTPHONES, AND TABLETS ARE NOT THE DEVICE MANUFACTURER S RESPONSIBILITY TIA does not believe that the manufacturer should be responsible for video description and emergency information requirements under Section 203 for apparatus. Device manufacturers do not have control over what video programming is made available through these devices, and cannot require content owners to add video description to such content. While broadcasters are able to add emergency information to their content which is then provided by the MVPD, again, manufacturers of these alternative devices do not have control 10 11 47 C.F.R. 79.2(b(2 & (a(2. See FNPRM at 83. 4

over this. Further the CVAA limits video description requirements to linear programming from a MVPD service. 12 TIA believes that this responsibility falls to the MVPD s software application which enables their programming to be viewed on the alternative device. 13 As we note above, the device manufacturer does not control content, delivery, timing, etc., and it is the MVPD that creates the means through which the programming is viewed via their application for their subscribers. This programming is controlled and encrypted by the MVPD, with the device simply passing the content through. For these reasons, TIA does not believe that the manufacturers of personal computers, tablets, gaming consoles, and smartphones should be responsible for video description and emergency information requirements. IV. THE COMMISSION SHOULD NOT MANDATE MANUFACTURERS SEPARATE CUSTOMER SUPPORT FOR BLIND/VISUALLY DISABLED USERS REGARDING ACCESS TO VIDEO DESCRIPTION AND EMERGENCY INFORMATION In the FNPRM, the Commission requests input regarding whether dedicated customer support services be provided to assist consumers who are blind or visually impaired with accessing the secondary audio stream. 14 TIA does not believe that such a requirement should be extended to manufacturers. This separated customer support is not authorized by Section 12 47 U.S.C. 613(c & 613(f(2(A ( such programming is transmitted for display on television in digital format.. We believe that if Congress intended to reach IP-delivered programs, it would have explicitly referenced them, as it did in the context of closed captioning. See Closed Captioning of Internet Protocol-Delivered Video Programming: Implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010, Report and Order, 27 FCC Rcd 787, 78 ( 1 (2012. 13 Examples include apps for Verizon Fios, Time Warner s TWC, Cablevision Optimum, Cox s Mobile Connect, and Comcast s Xfinity. 14 See FNPRM at 86. 5

203, and would be, practically, redundant to existing customer support services already offered. Furthermore, as we note above, device manufacturers do not have the ability to aid consumers in gaining access to this information due to the MVPD s control over its own video programming. 6

V. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, TIA urges the Commission to take into consideration its views in this proceeding. Respectfully submitted, TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION By: /s/ Danielle Coffey Danielle Coffey Vice President, Government Affairs Brian Scarpelli Manager, Government Affairs TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION 1320 Court House Road Suite 200 Arlington, VA 22201 (703 907-7700 July 23, 2013 7