Towards an X-Band Power Source at CERN and a European Structure Test Facility

Similar documents
RF considerations for SwissFEL

Status of CTF3. G.Geschonke CERN, AB

CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3

Evaluation of Performance, Reliability, and Risk for High Peak Power RF Sources from S-band through X-band for Advanced Accelerator Applications

Detailed Design Report

THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER TEST ACCELERATOR: STATUS AND RESULTS * Abstract

IOT OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE ON ALICE AND EMMA AT DARESBURY LABORATORY

30 GHz Power Production / Beam Line

INFN School on Electron Accelerators. RF Power Sources and Distribution

STATUS OF THE SWISSFEL C-BAND LINEAR ACCELERATOR

RF plans for ESS. Morten Jensen. ESLS-RF 2013 Berlin

45 MW, 22.8 GHz Second-Harmonic Multiplier for High-Gradient Tests*

CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3

X-Band Klystron Development at

RF Power Generation II

STATUS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF CLIC

KARA and FLUTE RF Overview/status

Oak Ridge Spallation Neutron Source Proton Power Upgrade Project and Second Target Station Project

Current status of XFEL/SPring-8 project and SCSS test accelerator

J/NLC Progress on R1 and R2 Issues. Chris Adolphsen

Upgrading LHC Luminosity

Pulsed Klystrons for Next Generation Neutron Sources Edward L. Eisen - CPI, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA

STATUS OF THE SwissFEL C-BAND LINAC

Diamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes

Introduction to CTF3. G.Geschonke CERN / PS

Next Linear Collider. The 8-Pack Project. 8-Pack Project. Four 50 MW XL4 X-band klystrons installed on the 8-Pack

Pulses inside the pulse mode of operation at RF Gun

CEPC Klystron Development

Status of RF Power and Acceleration of the MAX IV - LINAC

4.4 Injector Linear Accelerator

L-Band RF R&D. SLAC DOE Review June 15 th, Chris Adolphsen SLAC

A HIGH POWER LONG PULSE HIGH EFFICIENCY MULTI BEAM KLYSTRON

CLIC FEASIBILITY DEMONSTRATION AT CTF3

Status of KEK X-band Test Facility and its future plans

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF L-BAND AND S-BAND MULTI BEAM KLYSTRONS

5 Project Costs and Schedule

LCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems

DEVELOPMENT OF X-BAND KLYSTRON TECHNOLOGY AT SLAC

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC R&D. D. L. Burke. DOE Annual Program Review SLAC April 9-11, 2003

3 cerl. 3-1 cerl Overview. 3-2 High-brightness DC Photocathode Gun and Gun Test Beamline

CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH. A 50 Hz LOW-POWER SOLID-STATE KLYSTRON-MODULATOR

DELIVERY RECORD. Location: Ibaraki, Japan

SLAC X-band Technology R&D. Tor Raubenheimer DOE Briefing June 11 th, 2010

Report on the LCLS Injector Technical Review

Present Status and Future Upgrade of KEKB Injector Linac

XFEL High Power RF System Recent Developments

CLEX (CLIC Experimental Area)

EUROFEL-Report-2007-DS EUROPEAN FEL Design Study

The TESLA RF System. S. Choroba. for the TESLA Collaboration. DESY Notkestr. 85, D Hamburg, Germany

LCLS Injector Technical Review

The CompactLight Project (XLS)

RUNNING EXPERIENCE OF FZD SRF PHOTOINJECTOR

Future Performance of the LCLS

ILC-LNF TECHNICAL NOTE

Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation

Development of klystrons with ultimately high - 90% RF power production efficiency

News from HZB / BESSY Wolfgang Anders at ESLS-RF Meeting September 2010 Trieste

reported by T. Shintake KEK / RIKEN Japan Summary of C-band R&D for Linear Collider at KEK New soft-x-ray FEL Project at RIKEN/SPring-8

LLRF at SSRF. Yubin Zhao

The Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation

Status of BESSY II and berlinpro. Wolfgang Anders. Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin for Materials and Energy (HZB) 20th ESLS-RF Meeting

X-band Solid State Modulator Development. Craig Burkhart Power Conversion Department January 5, 2011

Operational experience with the SOLEIL LINAC and Status of the ThomX LINAC project

North Damping Ring RF

Dark current and multipacting trajectories simulations for the RF Photo Gun at PITZ

Overview of the X-band R&D Program

SRS and ERLP developments. Andrew moss

NEW METHOD FOR KLYSTRON MODELING

Linac upgrade plan using a C-band system for SuperKEKB

IOT RF Power Sources for Pulsed and CW Linacs

RF Solutions for Science.

Empirical Model For ESS Klystron Cathode Voltage

TWO BUNCHES WITH NS-SEPARATION WITH LCLS*

Nick Walker DESY MAC

KEKB INJECTOR LINAC AND UPGRADE FOR SUPERKEKB

Development of Multiple Beam Guns for High Power RF Sources for Accelerators and Colliders

Overview of NLC/JLC Collaboration *

The FLASH objective: SASE between 60 and 13 nm

Compact, e-beam based mm-and THzwave light sources

TITLE PAGE. Title of paper: PUSH-PULL FEL, A NEW ERL CONCEPT Author: Andrew Hutton. Author Affiliation: Jefferson Lab. Requested Proceedings:

DEVELOPMENT OF A 10 MW SHEET BEAM KLYSTRON FOR THE ILC*

Studies on an S-band bunching system with hybrid buncher

Introduction: CW SRF linac types, requirements and challenges High power RF system architecture

Status of the X-ray FEL control system at SPring-8

High-power klystrons. The benchmark in scientific research. State-of-the-art RF sources for your accelerator

OF THIS DOCUMENT IS W8.MTO ^ SF6

The ESS Accelerator. For Norwegian Industry and Research. Oslo, 24 Sept Håkan Danared Deputy Head Accelerator Division Group Leader Beam Physics

Workshop on Accelerator Operations August 6-10, 2012 Glen D. Johns Accelerator Operations Manager

PULSED POWER FOR FUTURE LINEAR ACCELERATORS

SLAC ILC Accelerator R&D Program

SUMMARY OF THE ILC R&D AND DESIGN

Digital BPMs and Orbit Feedback Systems

NSLS-II RF Systems James Rose, Radio Frequency Group Leader PAC 2011

The PEFP 20-MeV Proton Linear Accelerator

2 Work Package and Work Unit descriptions. 2.8 WP8: RF Systems (R. Ruber, Uppsala)

High Power Solid State Modulator Development at SLAC. Craig Burkhart Power Conversion Department March 5, 2010

Activities on FEL Development and Application at Kyoto University

STATUS OF THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR COLLIDER

Beam Losses During LCLS Injector Phase-1 1 Operation

STATUS OF THE EUROPEAN XFEL

Transcription:

Towards an X-Band Power Source at CERN and a European Structure Test Facility Erk Jensen and Gerry McMomagle CERN The X-Band Accelerating Structure Design and Test-Program Workshop Day 2: Structure Testing Programs and Facilities

Present situation Existing mid-linac power station test facility High-gradient gradient test stand, CTF2 Two-beam 30 GHz power production in CTF3 High-power transfer line CTF3 linac PETs branch

Plan The Two-beam Test Stand (2TBTS) will eventually be our structure test facility. It will be operational for structure tests from 2009 (but only up to 140 ns pulse length!) We could transform the mid-linac power station to 12 GHz?, but it would not be ready before 2BTS, it would interfere with other CTF3 commissioning, it could not be operated in parallel with 2BTS, while transforming, we wouldn t have no facility at all. We continue and intensify tests at 11.424 GHz, both at SLAC and KEK. But we really need a stand-alone test t stand soon! This need is not new!

In 2005, I wrote *) : During CTF3 construction phase, limited time available to produce 30 GHz power. Test 4 5 structures/year + waveguide components + pulse surface heating experiments? CTF3 runs at 10 Hz (limit 50 Hz), which is low for conditioning Mo or W structures. Tests of Mo structures at SLAC indicate a factor 10 lower conditioning rate than Cu! CTF3 is a test facility, not a production accelerator. Only one 30 GHz output from CTF3! This is why we need a reliable, stand-alone alone 30 GHz power source: > 160 MW, > 70 ns, > 100 Hz The frequency has changed, but many arguments are still valid today. *) at the SLAC meeting where the US High Gradient Collaboration was established

Parameters Ideal Parameters of an X-band Test-stand: (new) CLIC and CTF3 frequency: 11.9942 GHz Repetition rate: high (50 Hz or higher) Power and pulse Power/pulse length range specification length: variable For example: 200 MW 100 ns, 100 MW 350 ns, 80 MW 500 ns This can be implemented using pulse compression peak pow wer [MW] 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 pulse length [ns]

Test facility based on a single klystron Modulator phase modulation klystron 50 MW 1500 ns test slot hybrid 200 MW, 0... 100 ns or 100 MW, 0... 350 ns pulse compression

Test facility based on two klystrons Common modulator phase modulation klystron 50 MW 1500 ns test slot 1 klystron 50 MW 1500 ns hybrid 100 MW, 0... 750 ns test slot 2 100 MW, 0... 750 ns (more possible with pulse compression)

A remarkable coincidence: Just as we identified our need, so did 3 other labs in Europe: PSI Villingen for the PSI-FEL project Sincrotrone Trieste for FERMI @ Elettra LNF Frascati for SPARC/SPARX

STEP 2 The PSI-FEL project (from M. Pedrozzi s presentation) 250 MeV injector facility - accelerator layout (Courtesy of René Bakker - in progress) 2 cell S cavity (1.5 +4.5 GHz) 4 x 4 m (3 GHz) 2 Quad. triplets Compression chicane Standard coil Or larger pulsed coil Pulse compressor 4.5 1.5 1.5 3 3 12 One power source (50-60MW) per 2 S-band structure: cost efficient loading area 1 laser hutch control room controls 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 gun linac bunch compressor klystron area beam dump 4 m (1) HV pulser (2) 2 cells 2 freq. cavity (3) L-band TW structures (4) S-band TW structures (5) X-band harmonic cavity (6) quadruple triplets (7) compression chicane (8) deflecting cavity 60 m 70 m

FERMI@ELETTRA FERMI project (from G. D Auria s presentation) Linac Available: 8 Klystron stations; 9 Accelerating sections: 2 FW_TW 3 m 7 BW_TW 6 m 7 Accelerating e sections s donated by CERN. Klystron gallery Linac tunnel

Machine layout FERMI project (from G. D Auria s presentation) X-band Laser heater E~100 MeV 9 Slac type FW_TW 2/3 π (3.0-4.5 m) without Sled 7 nose cone BW_TW 3/4 π (6.1 m) with Sled

Light Sources why X-band? Bunch phase space at exit of 1st bunch compressor. Without X-band With X-band Harmonic system (S-band acceleration) to linearize phase space for better FEL performance

A remarkable coincidence: Just as we identified our need, so did 3 other labs in Europe: PSI Villingen for the PSI-FEL project Sincrotrone Trieste for FERMI @ Elettra LNF Frascati for SPARC/SPARX These labs are looking for initially 20 to 30 MW (for phase space linearization). It seems like a really good idea to join forces. So we got together and agreed on common klystron parameters: 11.9942 GHz, 50 MW peak, 1.5 μs, 50 Hz

This happens to be similar to SLAC s XL4 Parameter Value Units Operating frequency 11.424 GHz RF pulse length 1.5 μsec Peak output power 50 MW Pulse repetition rate 60 Hz Efficiency 40 % Gain 50 db Bandwidth 25 MHz Perveance 1.2 μperv Beam voltage 410 kv only the frequency needs a 5 % tweak.

The klystron is well feasible European Industry (Thales, E2V, TMD) have no relevant experience. SLAC or Toshiba could build such a klystron and in fact, both have given us some very positive indications including delay and cost. Indicative estimates Toshiba SLAC Design and prototype 990 kchf 15 months 665 kchf 18 months Production tube 580 kchf 10 months after proto 485 kchf 6 months after proto Total cost 1570 kchf 1150 kchf The scaling from 11.4 GHz to 12 GHz requires only little change. Important to us (in addition to the technical specification) minimum risk shortest delay reliable operation

Overall short term klystron needs in Europe 2008 2009 2010 CERN 1 (+1) 0 LNF 1 1(?) PSI 1 (+1) Elettra 1 There is an immediate need of 2 klystrons, with an option of 2 to 5 more.

Pulse compression We have TM 01 line (Ø 50 mm) available for up to 160 ns. This was meant for 30 GHz for 12 GHz we would prefer Ø 90 mm.

Power gain for 1.5 μs klystron pulse 6 5 Ø90mm Pow wer gain 4 3 2 Ø 70 mm Ø 50 mm 1 0 100 150 200 250 300 Line length x2, ns from Igor

Possible location building 2001 klystron gallery above CTF3 building 2013 Laser room proposed 12 GHz area Advantages: existing infrastructure (water, electricity, bunker, controls) proximity to 2BTS

A possible schedule 2007 2008 2009 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 Klystron Price Enquiry Finance Committee Approval Order Klystron Klystron design 1st Klystron Manufacture and Delivery 2nd Klystron Manufacture and Delivery Modulator Price Enquiry Finance Committee Approval Modulator Manufacture and Delivery Preparation of Modulator area Procurement and preparation of auxiliaries Preparation of test area Procurement and manufacture of test area equipment Low level RF START TEST STAND COMISSIONING (single klystron)

Resulting possible number of tests at CERN From Steffen s talk this morning 2007 2008 2009 2010 sum 30 GHz 5 3 0 0 8 12 GHz 0 1 4 4 9 11.4 GHz 2 4 4 4 14 Stand alone at CERN 0 0 8 8 16 sum 7 8 16 16 47

Summary The XBKTS *) (X-band Klystron Test Stand) is in reach and it will be implemented. There is strong common interest with planned European light-sources (PSI, LNF, Elettra), which will be fully exploited pot (in (nasortof jont of joint-venture ). ntur The facility is based on a klystron very similar to those developed and built for NLC. The total cost of a facility is estimated around 2.7 MCHF or 1.6 M or 2.2 M$ $plus 4 FTEy. It will be operational in early 2009. *) AKA