THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER TEST ACCELERATOR: STATUS AND RESULTS * Abstract

Similar documents
Overview of the X-band R&D Program

DEVELOPMENT OF X-BAND KLYSTRON TECHNOLOGY AT SLAC

Next Linear Collider. The 8-Pack Project. 8-Pack Project. Four 50 MW XL4 X-band klystrons installed on the 8-Pack

J/NLC Progress on R1 and R2 Issues. Chris Adolphsen

4.4 Injector Linear Accelerator

Detailed Design Report

45 MW, 22.8 GHz Second-Harmonic Multiplier for High-Gradient Tests*

RF System for the Main Linacs

Present Status and Future Upgrade of KEKB Injector Linac

Overview of NLC/JLC Collaboration *

Chapter 4. Rf System Design. 4.1 Introduction Historical Perspective NLC Rf System Overview

RF considerations for SwissFEL

Towards an X-Band Power Source at CERN and a European Structure Test Facility

NEW METHOD FOR KLYSTRON MODELING

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC R&D. D. L. Burke. DOE Annual Program Review SLAC April 9-11, 2003

Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation

OF THIS DOCUMENT IS W8.MTO ^ SF6

November 5,1999. The NLC Injector UCRL-JC

STATUS OF THE SWISSFEL C-BAND LINEAR ACCELERATOR

PEP II Design Outline

SUMMARY OF THE ILC R&D AND DESIGN

TESLA FEL-Report

CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3

RF POWER GENERATION FOR FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDERS* 1. Introduction

Linac upgrade plan using a C-band system for SuperKEKB

LCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems

3 cerl. 3-1 cerl Overview. 3-2 High-brightness DC Photocathode Gun and Gun Test Beamline

STATUS OF THE SwissFEL C-BAND LINAC

DEVELOPMENT OF A 10 MW SHEET BEAM KLYSTRON FOR THE ILC*

reported by T. Shintake KEK / RIKEN Japan Summary of C-band R&D for Linear Collider at KEK New soft-x-ray FEL Project at RIKEN/SPring-8

Current status of XFEL/SPring-8 project and SCSS test accelerator

RF Power Generation II

INFN School on Electron Accelerators. RF Power Sources and Distribution

The PEFP 20-MeV Proton Linear Accelerator

KEKB INJECTOR LINAC AND UPGRADE FOR SUPERKEKB

* Work supported by Department of Energy contract DE-AC03-76SF RF Pulse Compression. for F'uture Linear Colliders* SLAC-PUB

SLAC X-band Technology R&D. Tor Raubenheimer DOE Briefing June 11 th, 2010

Design of a 50 MW Klystron at X-Band*

X-Band Klystron Development at

STATUS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF CLIC

Status of RF Power and Acceleration of the MAX IV - LINAC

Status of CTF3. G.Geschonke CERN, AB

Evaluation of Performance, Reliability, and Risk for High Peak Power RF Sources from S-band through X-band for Advanced Accelerator Applications

Conceptual Design for the New RPI 2020 Linac

The basic parameters of the pre-injector are listed in the Table below. 100 MeV

Development of High Power Vacuum Tubes for Accelerators and Plasma Heating

A SHEET-BEAM KLYSTRON PAPER DESIGN

L-Band RF R&D. SLAC DOE Review June 15 th, Chris Adolphsen SLAC

Tutorial: Trak design of an electron injector for a coupled-cavity linear accelerator

Diamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes

The ESS Accelerator. For Norwegian Industry and Research. Oslo, 24 Sept Håkan Danared Deputy Head Accelerator Division Group Leader Beam Physics

Development of Multiple Beam Guns for High Power RF Sources for Accelerators and Colliders

SLAC R&D Program for a Polarized RF Gun

Studies on an S-band bunching system with hybrid buncher

A HIGH POWER LONG PULSE HIGH EFFICIENCY MULTI BEAM KLYSTRON

PEP II Status and Plans

PEP-I1 RF Feedback System Simulation

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)525. The RF system for FCC-ee. A. Butterworth CERN 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

Review of Pulsed RF Power Generation Theodore L. Lavine

IOT OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE ON ALICE AND EMMA AT DARESBURY LABORATORY

P. Emma, et al. LCLS Operations Lectures

PEP II STATUS AND PLANS *

Trigger-timing signal distribution system for the KEK electron/positron injector linac

RF Design of the LCLS Gun C.Limborg, Z.Li, L.Xiao, J.F. Schmerge, D.Dowell, S.Gierman, E.Bong, S.Gilevich February 9, 2005

HIGH-GRADIENT ELECTRON ACCELERATOR POWERED BY A RELATIVISTIC KLYSTRON*

LEP OPERATION AND PERFORMANCE WITH ELECTRON-POSITRON COLLISIONS AT 209 GEV

CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3

OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AT J-PARC

Summary of the 1 st Beam Line Review Meeting Injector ( )

Phase (deg) Phase (deg) Positive feedback, 317 ma. Negative feedback, 330 ma. jan2898/1638: beam pseudospectrum around 770*frev.

CLIC FEASIBILITY DEMONSTRATION AT CTF3

POLARIZED LIGHT SOURCES FOR PHOTOCATHODE ELECTRON GUNS AT SLAC?

Accelerator Instrumentation RD. Monday, July 14, 2003 Marc Ross

Oak Ridge Spallation Neutron Source Proton Power Upgrade Project and Second Target Station Project

Pulsed Klystrons for Next Generation Neutron Sources Edward L. Eisen - CPI, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA

THE X-BAND KLYSTRON PROGRAM AT SLAC'

ILC-LNF TECHNICAL NOTE

SLAC ILC Accelerator R&D Program

The LEP Superconducting RF System

PRESENT STATUS OF J-PARC

High Power Solid State Modulator Development at SLAC. Craig Burkhart Power Conversion Department March 5, 2010

Design Studies For The LCLS 120 Hz RF Gun Injector

STATUS OF THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR COLLIDER

Performance of a DC GaAs photocathode gun for the Jefferson lab FEL

New Filling Pattern for SLS-FEMTO

The Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation

Report on the LCLS Injector Technical Review

Pseudospark-sourced Micro-sized Electron Beams for High Frequency klystron Applications

Status of SOLARIS Arkadiusz Kisiel

30 GHz Power Production / Beam Line

XFEL High Power RF System Recent Developments

RECENT PROGRESS IN UPGRADE OF THE HIGH INTENSITY THzzz zz-fel AT OzSAKzA UNIVERSITYzzzz

Precision measurements of beam current, position and phase for an e+e- linear collider

A Facility for Accelerator Physics and Test Beam Experiments

Status of KEK X-band Test Facility and its future plans

Introduction: CW SRF linac types, requirements and challenges High power RF system architecture

PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Longitudinal phase space monitors for the ILC injectors and bunch compressors

Development of beam-collision feedback systems for future lepton colliders. John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science, Oxford University

Development of an Abort Gap Monitor for High-Energy Proton Rings *

The TESLA RF System. S. Choroba. for the TESLA Collaboration. DESY Notkestr. 85, D Hamburg, Germany

Transcription:

SLAC PUB 7246 June 996 THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER TEST ACCELERATOR: STATUS AND RESULTS * Ronald D. Ruth, SLAC, Stanford, CA, USA Abstract At SLAC, we are pursuing the design of a Next Linear Collider (NLC) which would begin with a center-of-mass energy of 0.5 TeV, and would be upgradable to.0 TeV and beyond []. To achieve this high energy, for the past several years we have been working on the development of a high-gradient.4-ghz (X-band) linear accelerator for the main linac of the collider. In this paper, we present the status and initial results from the Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator (NLCTA) [2]. The goal of the NLCTA is to model the high gradient linac of the NLC. It incorporates the new technologies of X-band accelerator structures, rf pulse compression systems and high-power klystrons into a 0.5 to.0 GeV linac which is a test bed for beam dynamics issues related to high-gradient acceleration. Invited talk presented at the Fifth European Particle Accelerator Conference, Sitges (Barcelona), Spain 0-4 June 996 * Work supported by Department of Energy contract DE AC03 76SF0055.

THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER TEST ACCELERATOR: STATUS AND RESULTS Ronald D. Ruth, SLAC, Stanford, CA, USA Abstract At SLAC, we are pursuing the design of a Next Linear Collider (NLC) which would begin with a centerof-mass energy of 0.5 TeV, and would be upgradable to.0 TeV and beyond []. To achieve this high energy, for the past several years we have been working on the development of a high-gradient.4-ghz (X-band) linear accelerator for the main linac of the collider. In this paper, we present the status and initial results from the Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator (NLCTA) [2]. The goal of the NLCTA is to model the high gradient linac of the NLC. It incorporates the new technologies of X-band accelerator structures, rf pulse compression systems and high-power klystrons into a 0.5 to.0 GeV linac which is a test bed for beam dynamics issues related to high-gradient acceleration. INTRODUCTION The Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator (NLCTA) is a 42-meter-long beam line consisting consecutively, of an injector, a chicane, a linac, and a spectrometer. Klystron/ driver amp TE0 window 25 db Prebuncher cavities Legend.4 GHz Distribution MOD MOD MOD MOD SLED-II Pulse Compressors (40-m-long delay lines) Injector (2 x 0.9 m) Linac (6 x.8 m) TE0 waveguide valve Dashes indicate upgrade TE 0 rectangular waveguide TE 0 circular waveguide TE 0 / TE 0 Transducer Figure. A schematic of the NLCTA rf system The injector is a 50-KeV gridded thermioniccathode gun, and X-band prebuncher, a capture section, and a preacceleration section. Downstream from the injector we have a magnetic chicane for longitudinal 896A phase-space manipulation, energy measurement and collimation. After the collimation, the average current injected into the linac will be comparable to the NLC specification,.0 ncoul/.4 ns. The NLCTA linac when complete will consist of six.8-meter-long X-band accelerator sections which are designed to suppress the long-range transverse wakefield. These sections are powered by three 50-MW klystrons whose peak power is quadrupled by SLED-II rf pulse compressors. This will yield an unloaded acceleration gradient of 50 MV/m so that the maximum energy gain of the beam in the linac is 540 MeV. The NLCTA rf system parameters are listed in Table. Downstream from the linac we have a magnetic spectrometer that can analyze the bunch train after acceleration. A vertical kicker magnet in the spectrometer will provide a method for separating the bunches vertically so that the energy and energy spread may be measured along the bunch train. We can also measure the emittance in the spectrometer and in the chicane. In the future we plan to increase the linac gradient to 85 MV/m by installing six 75 MW klystrons as shown in Table 2. We also plan to upgrade the injector in order to increase the bunch spacing and intensity, each by a factor of 6. This will permit more detailed beamdynamics studies on a train of bunches similar to that required for the NLC. Table. NLCTA RF System Parameters Parameter Design Upgrade Linac Energy 540 MeV 920 MeV Active Length 0.8 m 0.8m Acc. Gradient 50 MeV 85 MeV Inj. Energy 90 MeV 90 MeV RF Freq..4 GHz.4 GHz No. of Klystrons 4 7 Klystron Power 50 MW 75 MW Klystron Pulse.5 µsec.5 µsec RF Compression 4.0 4.0 Structure Length.8 m.8 m In the next few sections we discuss the status of the NLCTA, and we conclude the paper with a discussion of the initial results and plans for commissioning. 2 CONVENTIONAL SYSTEMS All the conventional systems for the NLCTA are essentially complete. All of the non-rf components in the beam line are installed; this includes magnets, beam position monitors, vacuum system and all shielding and cabling. All of the power supplies are installed and tested and are operated routinely with the NLCTA

control system which is an extension of the SLC control system. The thermionic electron gun and all injector solenoids are installed and tested. Presently, the beam line is under vacuum with the linac accelerator structures replaced by vacuum spool pieces. 3 THE RF SYSTEM A schematic layout of the NLCTA rf system is shown in Fig.. The beam is initially bunched with two pre-buncher cavities at the fundamental frequency of.424 GHz. It is then accelerated in two 0.9 m-long rf structures with an unloaded energy gain of 90 MeV. The first of these two injector structures has several low-beta cells to capture the beam optimally. The injector accelerators and prebunchers are powered by a single 50 MW klystron compressed by a factor of 4 by a SLED-II pulse compression system. After the chicane, the linac consists of six.8 m-long structures. Each of the first two pairs is powered initially by a single 50 MW klystron. The final pair of structures and final klystron will be installed in 997 and will use the SLED-II compression system in common with the middle pair of the linac as shown in Fig.. Notice that an upgrade is shown to the rf system denoted by the dashed lines in Fig.. The parameters for this upgrade are given in Table. As klystrons become available, we plan to upgrade the energy of the NLCTA by adding an additional klystron to each modulator. Each of the four modulators are designed to accept and power two 75 MW klystrons. This will yield an unloaded accelerating gradient of 85 MV/m after the upgrade. The plan for the NLC includes a similar upgrade from 0.5 TeV to.0 TeV in which the accelerating gradient is increased by the same amount. We hope to test this upgrade path in the NLCTA. In the next several sections we show the status and results for the rf system to date in more detail. (.2 µsec for the NLC). Thus far the klystron development effort at SLAC has produced four klystrons that meet or exceed the NLCTA specification [3]. In Fig. 2 you see the output power of the fourth in the series, XL-4. It is a very robust klystron with a very stable output power. As you can see from Fig. 2, XL-4 can produce a 75 MW pulse.2 µsec long. Both XL-2 and XL-3 also produce more than the required 50 MW and all of the three klystrons have the required bandwidth to work with the SLED-II compression system. The XL-4 klystron has been installed on the NLCTA injector modulator and will be used to power the initial commissioning of the injector of the NLCTA. Tuner Resonant Delay Line (TE 0 ) Coupling Aperture Mode Transducer (to TE 0 ) Waveguide from Klystron 2 3 4 3 db Coupler Waveguide to Accelerator 896A3 Figure 3. A schematic of the SLED-II rf compression. Several more klystrons of the XL-4 type will be produced for the NLCTA. However, the development effort for NLC klystrons has been turned towards the development of a periodic permanent magnet (PPM) focused klystron[4]. This eliminates the focusing solenoid from the klystron which reduces both the capital and operating cost significantly. The initial tests of the first PPM klystron have just been completed yielding up to 60 MW with about 60% efficiency. This klystron power exceeds the 50 MW required for the 0.5 TeV NLC. 7-96 896A2 XL 4 Klystron Test, 2//96 Efficiency 47.5% Gain 53.6 db Beam Voltage 450 kv Output Power 75.3 MW 0.5 µs/div Figure 2. High-Power test of XL-4. 4 KLYSTRON STATUS AND RESULTS The NLCTA (and NLC) specifications call for a 50 MW Klystron operating with a.5 µsec pulse length Power (MW) 200 00 7-96 896A4 0 SLED II Klystron (XL-2) 0.5 µs/div Figure 4. High-power test of the SLED-II prototype. 5 RF PULSE COMPRESSION A schematic diagram of the SLED-II compression system is shown in Fig. 3. The klystron power flows through a 3-dB hybrid where it is split to resonantly charge two delay lines. After several round trip times the klystron phase is flipped by 80 degrees, after which the power from the klystron adds to the power emitted

from the delay lines to create a large compressed pulse of RF power. In Fig. 4 you see high-power tests of the SLED-II prototype for the NLCTA powered by the XL- 2 klystron. The prototype exceeded the required output power of 200 MW but with a shorter pulse of 50 nsec [5]. Three SLED-II systems have been completed for the NLCTA, and the injector compression system has been installed. Initial low-power tests of the injector SLED-II system have shown excellent performance with an overall efficiency that exceeded our expectations (see Fig. 5)[6]. High-power tests of the injector SLED-II system will take place in the summer of 996 immediately prior to injector commissioning. Power 5 4 3 2 SLED II Output Pulse Input Pulse 0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 7-96 Time (µs) 896A5 Figure 5. Low-power test of Injector SLED-II system. 6 RF STRUCTURE STATUS The NLC requires accelerator structures that operate reliably with an unloaded gradient of 50 MV/m for the 0.5 TeV collider and 85 MV/m for the.0 TeV upgrade. The NLCTA will serve as a model of this upgrade path in that we will begin at the lower acceleration gradient and eventually increase the gradient to the required 85 MV/m (see Table ). In addition to the gradient requirement, the NLC structures must be designed to substantially reduce the long-range transverse wakefields that can cause beam breakup. To achieve this reduction we have pursued two basic types of accelerator structures, the detuned structure and the damped-detuned structure. As you can see in Fig., there are a total of eight structures in the NLCTA. The first two are one-half-length detuned structures. The second pair are full-length detuned structures. The third pair are damped-detuned structures; and finally, the last pair will initially be KEK detuned structures and later will be damped-detuned structures. 6. Detuned Structures In a constant gradient traveling wave structure the irises are tapered to vary the group velocity in order to keep the gradient constant in spite of the loses in the structure. This tapering produces a variation of the frequency of the first dipole mode along the structure length that can be as much as 0%. The detuned structure takes advantage of this by changing the profile of the iris taper in order to create a smooth Gaussianlike distribution of higher-order modes. This leads to a Gaussian like initial decay of the wake field behind the bunch[7]. We have tested this concept in the Accelerator Structure Test Set-up (ASSET) facility in the SLC. The results are shown in Fig. 6[8]. In the upper graph you see the measured data plotted with an idealized model. In the lower graph you see the data plotted with the same model but with frequency errors included. In general, there is excellent agreement with expectations although some of the detailed features of the wakefield differ from the model. This technique has been used to manufacture four structures in the NLCTA. The first three are complete and the remaining structure will be brazed this summer. W (V/pC/m/mm) W (V/pC/m/mm) 00 0 0. 00 0 0. 896A6 0 20 40 60 80 00 20 t (ns) Figure 6. Wakefield measurements and theory of the detuned structure (a) ideal case and (b) with.5 0-4 frequency errors. 6.2 High-Power Tests of Structures During the past several years we have performed many high-power tests of different types of structures[9]. These tests indicate that surface fields up to 500 MV/m can be obtained in copper structures at.4 GHz. In power-limited tests, average acceleration gradients in short structures have reached 20 MV/m[0]. In Fig. 7 we plot the dark current observed versus accelerating field in the first.8 m damped structure. The highest field reached was 67 MV/m which was limited by available power at that time. Although the dark current grows rapidly, at 50 MV/m it is well within acceptable levels, and there is evidence that the level can be reduced by more than an order of magnitude when care is taken to keep the structure surfaces clean during manufacture[]. Accelerating gradients of up to (a) (b)

85 MV/m in full-length structures should be straightforward to obtain with proper conditioning. Peak Dark Current (ma) 0 0 0 7-96 896A7 0 0 2 0 3 40 60 80 Average Accelerating Gradient (MV/m) Figure 7. High-power tests of the.8 m detuned structure. 6.2 Damped-Detuned Structures In order to further reduce the wakefield and the tolerances, it is necessary to provide some moderate damping for the higher-order dipole modes. To accomplish this we have developed a damped-detuned structure that uses four symmetrically placed manifolds to provide the damping [2]. A schematic of the cell for the structure is shown in Fig. 8. The structure cells are coupled to four waveguides that are formed when the cells are diffusion bonded together. The dipole mode is coupled out to the waveguide where is propagates to the end of the structure to a load. This techniques should damp the first dipole modes with Qs of about 000. The signals from the manifold can be used as a beam position to align the structure to the beam. Alignment Groove Cavity Wall Groove for Water Tube 896A8 Apertured Iris Damping Waveguide Element Figure 8. A cell of the Damped-Detuned structure. We are presently constructing two damped-detuned structures in collaboration with KEK. The cells have been diamond-point machined at KEK and are diffusion bonded to create the full structure at SLAC. We have just completed the first damped-detuned structure, and we plan to test it in the ASSET facility in August 996. One critical aspect of the construction process is the internal alignment of the structure. For the dampeddetuned structure this is accomplished by bonding short stacks of cells together that have been aligned in a precise V-block. In Fig. 9 you see a plot of the alignment of a short stack of 38 cells. The tolerance for this scale of alignment is also shown. It is evident that for this short section we have achieved an rms. alignment of a few microns, far better than required. In some cases the short sections develop a bend after bonding, but we have found that it is quite straightforward to straighten after bonding. We will be testing the alignment of the full structure just prior to testing in ASSET in August 996. Deviation from Straightness (µ) 8 96 20 0 0 0 20 20 Before Bonding X Y rms Tolerance rms Tolerance 30 40 Cell Number After Bonding X Y 50 60 896A9 Figure 9. Alignment after diffusion bonding of a short stack of cells in the Damped-Detuned structure. 7 INJECTOR STATUS AND TESTS The NLCTA injector as shown in Fig. consists of a 50-KV gridded thermionic gun, two prebuncher cavities and two 0.9 m detuned accelerator structures. This section is surrounded by solenoids to provide the necessary focusing. The beam is bunched at the fundamental RF frequency and is the same average current as required in the NLC. A later gun upgrade will provide the bunch structure of the NLC. As of this writing all of the components in the injector are installed. We have performed our first tests of the NLCTA injector. The gun was conditioned up to 50 KV and we produced a stable 2.5 A beam with 70 nsec pulse width. The beam profile was measured one meter downstream from the gun and was the size and shape expected. The injector klystron, SLED-II system and structures are now all installed. We plan to condition the injector rf system in August 96 and accelerate beam in the injector around the same time.

8 FUTURE PLANS The NLCTA injector commissioning began in May 996. We plan to continue the injector commissioning in the summer to obtain accelerated beam in August 996. The remainder of the rf system will be installed in the fall of 996, and we plan to accelerate beam in the linac by the end of 996. In 997 we will begin beam dynamics tests in the NLCTA. After initial commissioning we plan an extensive study of multibunch beam loading compensation. The beam loading in the NLCTA is about 25%, and we hope to achieve 0.% energy spread along the bunch train by shaping the RF pulse. We will also investigate beam break up in the NLCTA. In spite of the short length, the NLCTA is quite sensitive to beam break up due to its low injection energy. If our structure development program is successful, we expect to see only a few percent beam break up. Transverse accelerating fields due to misalignments or structure fabrication errors can cause an effective emittance dilution by tilting the bunch from head to tail. This effect will be measured in the NLCTA with a sensitivity necessary for NLC tolerances. In addition to the running planed for 997, we will complete the full linac with the final rf station and the installation of the KEK prototype accelerator structures. In the future, as klystrons become available, we plan to complete the energy upgrade of the NLCTA as shown in Fig. and Table. 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The NLCTA progress has been and continues to be the result of the hard work of many people. I would like to thank the NLCTA group for the ongoing success in the construction and commissioning of the NLCTA. REFERENCES [] Zeroth-Order Design Report for the Next Linear Collider, SLAC Report 474, 996. [2] R. D. Ruth et al., The Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator, SLAC-PUB-6293, in Proc. 993 Part. Accel. Conf., Washington, DC, 543-545 (993). [3] G. Caryotakis, The X-Band Klystron Development Program at SLAC, SLAC-PUB-746, in Proc. of the 3rd Int. Wksp. on Pulsed RF Sources for Linear Colliders, Hayama, Japan, 996. [4] D. Sprehn et al., PPM Focused X-Band Klystron Development at SLAC, SLAC-PUB-723, in Proc. of the 3rd Int. Wksp. on Pulsed RF Sources for Linear Colliders, Hayama, Japan, 996. [5] S. G. Tantawi et al., Performance Measurements of SLAC s X-band High-Power Pulse Compression System (SLED-II), SLAC-PUB-6775, submitted for publication. [6] S. G. Tantawi, et al., The Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator s RF Pulse Compression and Transmission Systems, SLAC-PUB-7247 and in these proceedings. [7] K. L. F. Bane and R. L. Gluckstern, The Transverse Wakefield of a Detuned X-Band Accelerating Structure, SLAC-PUB-5783, Part. Acc. 42, 23 (993). [8] C. Adolphsen et al., Measurement of Wakefield Suppression in a Detuned X-Band Accelerator Structure, SLAC-PUB-6629, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74: 759-762 (995). [9] J. W. Wang et al., High-Gradient Tests of SLAC Linear Collider Accelerator Structures, SLAC- PUB-667, Proc. of the 994 Int. Linac Conf., Tsukuba, Japan, 305-307 (994). [0] J. W. Wang et al., SLAC/CERN High-Gradient Tests of an X-band Accelerating Section, CERN- SL-95-27-RF, SLAC-PUB-667, in Proc. of 6th IEEE Part. Acc. Conf., Dallas Texas, 995. [] S. Takeda et al., High Gradient Experiments by the ATF, Proc. of the 99 Part. Acc. Conf., San Francisco, CA, 206-2063 (99). [2] R. M. Jones et al., Equivalent Circuit Analysis of the SLAC Damped Detuned Structure, SLAC- PUB-787, and in these proceedings.