Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Similar documents
Re: Universal Service Reform Mobility Fund, WT Docket No Connect America Fund, WC Docket No

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

BY ELECTRONIC FILING. March 25, 2009

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF PCIA THE WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

July 6, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPPOSITION OF PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The American Cable Association ( ACA ) hereby submits these comments in

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

In this document, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved, for a

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C Ameritech Operating Companies ) Transmittal No Tariff F.C.C. No.

March 10, Re: Notice of Ex parte presentation in MB Docket No.07-57

Federal Communications Commission

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR WAIVER AND RENEWAL

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

FOR PUBLIC VIEWING ONLY INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387 DTV TRANSITION STATUS REPORT. All previous editions obsolete. transition. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER. Adopted: February 20, 2013 Released: February 20, 2013

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Re: Notice of Oral Ex Parte Communications, WC Docket No

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C REPLY COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Telecommunications Advisors Since October 6, 2011

[MB Docket Nos , ; MM Docket Nos , ; CS Docket Nos ,

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C REPLY COMMENTS OF PEERLESS NETWORK, INC.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA


Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

January 11, Re: Notice of Ex parte presentation in MB Docket No.07-57

Before the STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATORY AUTHORITY

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Federal Communications Commission

April 7, Via Electronic Filing

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

DETERMINATION PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON A PROPOSAL FOR ASSIGNMENT OF SPECTRUM IN THE 700 MHZ BAND (MARCH 2013)

STATE OF NEW JERSEY Board of Public Utilities Two Gateway Center Newark, NJ

Updates to the Form and Filing System

WIRELESS PLANNING MEMORANDUM

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) In the Matter of ) WC Docket No Rural Call Completion ) )

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION

Statement of the National Association of Broadcasters

Marc Richter Vice President Regulatory Services. June 3, 2015 CONTAINS CRITICAL ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION. By Electronic Delivery

Canada Gazette, Part I, December 18, 2014, Notice No. SLPB Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band Eastlink s reply comments

DESCRIPTION OF TRANSACTION AND PUBLIC INTEREST STATEMENT

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

August 7, Legal Memorandum

Before the. Federal Communications Commission. Washington, DC

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington DC 20554

BEFORE THE Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C

Approved by OMB (September 2002)

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC In the Matter of ) ) Review of the Emergency Alert System ) EB Docket No.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Resolution Calling on the FCC to Facilitate the DTV Transition through Additional Consumer Education Efforts

FCC Releases Proposals for Broadcast Spectrum Incentive Auctions

Re: SES and Intelsat Notice of Ex Parte Presentations, GN Docket No

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ADVISORY Communications and Media

SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS

Legal Memorandum. In this issue, link to information about. Developments: FCC Proposes New Video Description Rules. April 29, 2016

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF ITTA THE VOICE OF AMERICA S BROADBAND PROVIDERS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

AREA CODE EXHAUST AND RELIEF. Questions and Answers

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DIVISION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AND CARRIERS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

APPENDIX D TECHNOLOGY. This Appendix describes the technologies included in the assessment

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

No IN THE ~uprem~ ~ourt o[ ~ ~n~b. CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Petitioner, V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL., Respondents.

Report touts benefits of CMA-sized spectrum licenses ahead of 600 MHz auction

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

RECEIVED IRRC 2010 NOV 23 P U: 20. November 23,2010

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Transcription:

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Connect America Fund ) WC Docket No. 10-90 ) Universal Service Reform Mobility Fund ) WT Docket No. 10-208 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF CHALLENGE WINDOW Pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission s rules, 1 The Rural Wireless Association, Inc. ( RWA ) 2 hereby requests that the challenge window established in the Federal Communications Commission ( FCC or Commission ) Public Notice, 3 in which the Rural Broadband Auctions Task Force, Wireline Competition Bureau, and Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (together, the Bureaus ) adopted procedures for the Mobility Fund Phase II ( MF-II ) challenge process, be extended to allow for the Commission to rule on RWA s Application for Review, being filed contemporaneously herewith, which requests that the Commission correct serious flaws in the challenge process. In the Challenge Process Public Notice, the Bureaus established a 150-day challenge process window that opens March 29, 2018 and closes August 27, 2018 during which challengers can submit data to establish the absence of qualified 4G LTE service in geographic areas where such service is presumed to 1 47 C.F.R. 1.46. 2 RWA is a Washington, DC based trade association that ensures wireless carriers with fewer than 100,000 subscribers have a strong voice in our nation s capital. RWA s members have joined together to speed the delivery of new, efficient, and innovative communications technologies to underserved rural communities across the United States of America. RWA s members are comprised of both independent wireless carriers and wireless carriers that are affiliated with rural telephone/broadband companies that are passionate about ensuring rural America is not left behind. 3 Procedures For the Mobility Fund Phase II Challenge Process, Public Notice, WT Docket No. 10-208, WC Docket No. 10-90 (rel. February 27, 2018) ( Challenge Process Public Notice ).

exist. RWA is not seeking to delay the opening of the challenge window. Rather, RWA is requesting that the window close 150 days after the Commission rules on RWA s Application for Review rather than 150 days from when the window opens on March 29, 2018. While RWA recognizes that such extensions are not routinely granted, the extension requested herein is limited, will promote the public interest, and is warranted. Grant of RWA s request will give the Commission an opportunity to correct a significant flaw in the challenge process while at the same time ensuring that small rural carriers will have sufficient time to collect the data that is required to challenge the existence of 4G LTE service in certain rural areas throughout the country. At the same time, challengers in less rural areas of the country will not be delayed in conducting their own data speed measurements or engaging in the challenge process. In the Challenge Process Public Notice, the Bureaus rejected arguments that a grid size of one square kilometer would create numerous problems and burdens for potential challengers seeking to collect speed data in Western states that are more sparely populated and where roads are laid out directly on the borders of a one mile-by-one mile grid. Instead, the Bureaus chose to require measurements be taken in grid areas of one square kilometer, even though this will in many cases significantly increase the time and costs of data testing as challengers will be required to negotiate with property owners to obtain access to test sites located on private lands, a challenge process impediment which could be avoided in most instances if testing could occur on public roads at specified points around the perimeter of a particular grid area. Furthermore, the Bureaus decision to adopt a one square kilometer grid size was based on its belief that using a metric grid standard in place of an imperial grid standard 2

would yield more granular data and presumably better replicate consumers experiences with signal coverage and data speeds. 4 However, as detailed in RWA s Application for Review, reliance on square-kilometer grids in areas where there are no roads to provide access to test points will require challengers to use drones or crop dusters to reach otherwise inaccessible areas. In such cases, the data measurements obtained by challengers will almost certainly overstate the availability of 4G LTE service on the ground, where terrain and foliage can and do impede signal reception and data speeds. Accordingly, adopting a one mile grid standard that will allow for ground measurements to be collected around the perimeter of each grid will more accurately reflect consumer experience with wireless service availability in those rural areas. As demonstrated in RWA s Application for Review, the Bureaus decision to ignore the reality of how roads are laid out in rural areas has yielded a challenge scheme in which thousands of kilometer grid squares lack the necessary road coverage and will therefore be unmeasurable using drive tests. Using a one mile grid standard that reflects the reality of how roads are laid out in many rural areas would substantially ameliorate this problem and allow challengers to provide the Commission with a more accurate measurement of mobile wireless coverage in these areas. For this reason, extending the challenge process window as requested by RWA will give the Commission the opportunity to correct a fundamental flaw in the challenge process while at the same time ensuring that challengers in rural areas will have sufficient time to conduct the type of testing that will give the Commission a more accurate picture of the absence of mobile wireless coverage in many areas where such coverage is presumed to exist. 4 Challenge Process Public Notice at 22-25. 3

Based on the foregoing, the Bureau should grant the extension requested by RWA and modify the challenge window to close 150 days after the Commission rules on RWA s Application for Review rather than 150 days from when the window opens on March 29, 2018. Respectfully submitted, RURAL WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, INC. March 29, 2018 By: Caressa D. Bennet, General Counsel Erin P. Fitzgerald, Regulatory Counsel 5185 MacArthur Blvd., NW, Suite 729 Washington, DC 20016 (202) 857-4519 legal@ruralwireless.org 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have on this day of March 29, 2018, served a true copy of the foregoing document by electronic mail upon the following: Matthew Gerst Assistant Vice President Regulatory Affairs CTIA 1400 16th Street, NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 mgerst@ctia.org Jill Canfield Vice President, Legal & Industry Assistant General Counsel NTCA The Rural Broadband Association 4121 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1000 Arlington, VA 22203 jcanfield@ntca.org Steven K. Berry Competitive Carriers Association 805 15 th Street NW, Suite 401 sberry@ccamobile.org Rebecca Murphy Thompson Competitive Carriers Association 805 15 th Street NW, Suite 401 rthompson@ccamobile.org Courtney Neville Competitive Carriers Association 805 15 th Street NW, Suite 401 cneville@ccamobile.org Tamara L. Preiss Verizon Communications 1300 I Street, NW Suite 500 East tamara.preiss@verizon.com William H. Johnson Verizon Communications 1300 I Street, NW Suite 500 East will.h.johnson@verizon.com David A. LaFuria Lukas, LaFuria, Gutierrez & Sachs, LLP 8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 1200 Tysons, VA 22102 dlafuria@fcclaw.com John Cimko Lukas, LaFuria, Gutierrez & Sachs, LLP 8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 1200 Tysons, VA 22102 jcimko@fcclaw.com Grant B. Spellmeyer Vice President Federal Affairs and Public Policy United States Cellular Corporation 500 N. Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 210 Washington, DC 20001 grant.spellmeyer@uscellular.com

Michele C. Farquhar Hogan Lovells US LLP 555 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 michele.farquhar@hoganlovells.com C. Sean Spivey Hogan Lovells US LLP 555 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 sean.spivey@hoganlovells.com Chip Strange Vice President, Strategy & Business Development Mosaik Solutions 6423 Shelby View Drive, Suite 101 Memphis, TN 38134 Chip.Strange@Mosaik.com Douglas J. Minster Vice President, Government and Regulatory Affairs ATN International, Inc. 500 Cummings Center Suite 2450 Beverly, MA 01915 dminster@atni.com /s/ Maureen Murphy Maureen Murphy, Legal Assistant Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP 1200 Nineteenth Street, NW Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 202-857-4408 2