Charlottesville / Central Virginia Region Q NestRealty.com 1 of 9

Similar documents
Charlottesville / Central Virginia Region Q NestRealty.com 1 of 9

Charlottesville / Central Virginia Region Q NestRealty.com 1 of 9

st Quarter Market Watch January March Sales Comparison

Pantomime SALES DATA REPORT

Sunday Maximum All TV News Big Four Average Saturday

Algebra I Module 2 Lessons 1 19

Predicts 2004: U.S. Color Copier Market Is All Business

Station web sites are nearly universal, but we found a TV station -- a Fox affiliate in the Midwest -- that said no, it didn't have one.

Study on the audiovisual content viewing habits of Canadians in June 2014

The RTDNA/Hofstra University Annual Survey found that 2009 meant another year of TV

SALES DATA REPORT

2018 RTDNA/Hofstra University Newsroom Survey

Evaluation of Serial Periodic, Multi-Variable Data Visualizations

Blueline, Linefree, Accuracy Ratio, & Moving Absolute Mean Ratio Charts

The Recent Development of Steel Industry in China

Toronto Alliance for the Performing Arts

Catalogue no XIE. Television Broadcasting Industries

FILM ON DIGITAL VIDEO

in the Howard County Public School System and Rocketship Education

2012 Television Pilot Production Report

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 2. SECTION 1: Executive Summary 3-6. SECTION 2: Where do people get news and how?..7-11

Key Maths Facts to Memorise Question and Answer

Suppose you make $1000 a week. Your company is in dire straits, and so you have to take a 50% pay cut.

Simulation Supplement B

INFO 665. Fall Collection Analysis of the Bozeman Public Library

GROWING VOICE COMPETITION SPOTLIGHTS URGENCY OF IP TRANSITION By Patrick Brogan, Vice President of Industry Analysis

Be grateful! Be happy with what you have while working for what you want! ~ H. Keller

TELEVISIONS. Overview PRODUCT CATEGORY REPORT

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE OFFICE AND RETAIL MARKET STUDY

Library Acquisition Patterns Preliminary Findings

Measuring Variability for Skewed Distributions

DEFINITIONS OF TERMS

Box Plots. So that I can: look at large amount of data in condensed form.

2005 IOWA LAND VALUE SURVEY: OVERVIEW

FIM INTERNATIONAL SURVEY ON ORCHESTRAS

User's Manual. Rev 1.0

Confidence Intervals for Radio Ratings Estimators

FOR LEASE 6759 HOLLYWOOD BLVD, LOS ANGELES, CA CHANDELIER PASSAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION PART OF PLANNED HOLLYWOOD HOTEL RSF AVAILABLE

Sundance Institute: Artist Demographics in Submissions & Acceptances. Dr. Stacy L. Smith, Marc Choueiti, Hannah Clark & Dr.

October 24, Press kit

Dektak Step by Step Instructions:

Contents. Introduction. Skyworks Solutions (SWKS) Cypress Semiconductor (CY) Sierra Wireless (SWIR) Silicon Labs (SLAB) Rockwell Automation (ROK)

Television, Internet and Mobile Usage in the U.S. A2/M2 Three Screen Report

AUDIENCES Image: The Huntsman: Winter s War 2016 Universal Pictures. Courtesy of Universal Studios Licensing LLC

PRESS RELEASE No. 186 of September 5, 2011 Average earnings *) in July 2011

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPORT ON CABLE INDUSTRY PRICES

Weeding book collections in the age of the Internet

2013 Television Pilot Production Report

Film and other screen sector production in the UK, January June (H1, Half Year) 2018

Purpose Remit Survey Autumn 2016

Seen on Screens: Viewing Canadian Feature Films on Multiple Platforms 2007 to April 2015

EE373B Project Report Can we predict general public s response by studying published sales data? A Statistical and adaptive approach

SCANNER TUNING TUTORIAL Author: Adam Burns

MANAGING HDR CONTENT PRODUCTION AND DISPLAY DEVICE CAPABILITIES

First Quarter Retail Market Report 2017

STAYING INFORMED ACROSS THE GARDEN STATE WHERE DO YOU GO AND WHAT DO YOU KNOW?

Arkansas High School All-Region Study Guide CLARINET

A Research Report by the Book Industry Environmental Council Prepared by Green Press Initiative

MATH 214 (NOTES) Math 214 Al Nosedal. Department of Mathematics Indiana University of Pennsylvania. MATH 214 (NOTES) p. 1/3

North American Business Activity Statistics First Quarter 2015

TI-Inspire manual 1. Real old version. This version works well but is not as convenient entering letter

Sonic's Third Quarter Results Reflect Current Challenges

Print versus Electronic Journal Use in Three Sci/Tech Disciplines: The Cultural Shi in Process

December 1, IDE-JETRO Symposium 1

Audiobooks and School Libraries

International Affairs Department, Telecommunications Bureau

Pulling the plug: Three-in-ten Canadians are forgoing home TV service in favour of online streaming

What is Statistics? 13.1 What is Statistics? Statistics

The Chorus Impact Study

Using DICTION. Some Basics. Importing Files. Analyzing Texts

Visible Vibrations (originally Chladni Patterns) - Adding Memory Buttons. Joshua Gutwill. August 2002

Musical Chairs: A 28-Year Study of the Supply and Demand of Orchestra Musicians in America

N E W S R E L E A S E

First-Time Electronic Data on Out-of-Home and Time-Shifted Television Viewing New Insights About Who, What and When

NEWSLETTER. i xãxüá. Watching Habit Grows 25% while Fasting. Data Highlight. NEWSLETTER p.1. This Edition: Data Highlight.

The One Penny Whiteboard

Pedestrian Safer Journey Ages Video Script

AMTR Report For Destiny Users

JVC Reports Business Results for Fiscal 2006 (April 1, 2005 March 31, 2006)

Estimation of inter-rater reliability

National TV Index Q Bringing clarity to the National TV landscape.

POV: Making Sense of Current Local TV Market Measurement

Lesson 7: Measuring Variability for Skewed Distributions (Interquartile Range)

DISTRIBUTION B F I R E S E A R C H A N D S T A T I S T I C S

Estimating Word Error Rate in PDF Files of Old Newspapers by Paul Bullock

2006 U.S. Theatrical Market Statistics. Worldwide Market Research & Analysis

LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS: Maintaining an Important Presence in 2016 & Beyond. August Copyright All Rights Reserved.

Magazine readership up on a year ago powered by variety of titles

Office Market Analysis

Community Choirs in Australia

Lesson 7: Measuring Variability for Skewed Distributions (Interquartile Range)

RELIABILITY REASON FOR A COMMERCIAL INADVERTENT-INTERCHANGE SETTLEMENT STANDARD.

The Proportion of NUC Pre-56 Titles Represented in OCLC WorldCat

Doubletalk Detection

Screen Industry: 2015/16

Shaking Shapes. Joshua Gutwill. November 2004

FACTSHEET 4 Consumption of broadcast TV

Chapter 2. Analysis of ICT Industrial Trends in the IoT Era. Part 1

Overview: 400% growth in 20 months

Print or e preference? An assessment of changing patterns in content usage at Regent s University London

Transcription:

Charlottesville / Central Virginia Region Q1 2012 NestRealty.com 1 of 9

Turning A Corner? After the market that we ve been suffering through over the past few years, we re very cautious to say that we re completely out of the woods. The scars of 2008, 2009, and 2010 are still too fresh to get overconfident this early. However, for the first time in years, we are finally seeing some consistently positive information flow from the trenches and from our spreadsheets. And while we don t quite have enough confidence to call the bottom of the market quite yet, we re a lot closer than we were a year ago. The positive news of the Charlottesville area real estate market comes in two forms: the news from the trenches and the news from the stat sheets. From the trenches, we re hearing of multiple offers, buyer confidence, feelings that homes are affordable again, and just an overall good vibe in the marketplace. Whereas it was not uncommon for a Sunday open house to have zero visitors in Spring Markets of the past, it s now not unheard of to have 10, 15 or even 25 people stroll through an open house. Are they all active buyers? No, of course not. But some are. The fact that they are out there looking is a move in the right direction and a sign that consumer confidence is starting to bounce back. Our stat sheets are telling us good things, too. Most notably: sales are up and inventory is down. We ve been talking for the last 3 years that inventory levels must go down in order for any type of recovery to occur. We also said that prices must come down in order to entice buyers back into the real estate market. From our peaks, we estimate that prices are down anywhere from 10-35% (depending on the price segment and location). So, with homes being more affordable, buyers feel much better about putting their hard-earned money into a home again. Cutting straight to the point: Q1 2012 was the best Q1 for the Charlottesville MSA since 2007. Overall, there were 495 total sales across all sub-markets. Single family home sales were up 16% from Q1 2011. Attached and Condominium sales were up 11.6%. On top of that, inventory and has come down. For the first time since 2007, for single family and attached/condos is in the single digits: 9.25 months for detached and 9.2 for attached/ condos. Both of those represent a double digit reduction in months of supply as compared to 2011. Albemarle County and the City of Charlottesville both performed very well in Q1 2012. Albemarle (229 total sales) had its most Q1 sales since 2007 and Charlottesville (85) had its most Q1 sales since 2008. Contracts written in Albemarle during Q1 were up in all 3 categories: single family (+31.6%), attached (+9.), and condominiums (+22.2%). Condo contracts written in the City of Charlottesville were flat in Q1, while single family (54.84%) and attached (160%) contracts written both jumped significantly. Overall, it seems as though our market is on a path to recovery. The historically low interest rates are definitely helping, but there are many other positive factors that are having an impact also. We ll definitely be keeping an eye on a few other key variables in the coming quarters, most notably: 1. How will the distressed sales (short sales and foreclosures) continue to affect values and buyer confidence? 2. With the Mortgage Interest Deduction potentially on the chopping block, how will that affect real estate values and demand? 3. Will the job market and other major economic indicators continue to improve and, in turn, help stabilize the real estate market? Stay tuned... NestRealty.com 2 of 9

Central Virginia/Charlottesville MSA Market Snapshot While the overall five year trend for the MSA trends downward, year-over-year sales are on the rise. Q1 sales for the Charlottesville MSA totaled 495 in 2012 - a nice increase from the 430 in 2011, 388 in 2010, and 326 in 2009. Sales of single family homes and attached/condos were up in Q1. Single family home sales bounced upwards 16%, while attached/condos increased a healthy 11.6%. In addition, Days continues to creep downward - down to 114 days for single family homes and 126 days for attached/condos. Five Year Trend of Sales Activity (Number of Sales) 5 YEAR TREND 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Q2 07 Q3 07 Q4 07 Q1 08 Q2 08 Q3 08 Q4 08 Q1 09 Q2 09 Q3 09 Q4 09 Q1 10 Q2 10 Q3 10 Q4 10 Q1 11 Q2 11 Q3 11 Q4 11 Q1 12 prices in Q1 were mixed. Single family home prices in the MSA were down just over 4% while attached and condos actually showed a 6% increase from Q1 2011. However, the most eye-catching statistics are the Levels and. For the first time since 2008, is back in the single digit range: single family inventory is 9.25 months (down 34%) and attached/condo is 9.2 (down 12.8%). inventory is also down across the board: down 8.1% for single family homes and 11% for attached and condos. levels have been a major problem over the last few years and it looks as though levels are starting to shift to more normal levels. This is very good news. MSA (Albemarle, Charlottesville, Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa, and Nelson) Price per Square Foot Sales Single Family Q1 2012 $318,804 $303,357 $254,250 $123.00 114 370 1546 9.25 Change -10.5% -9. -4.1% -12.1% -11.6% 16.0% -8.1% -34.0% Q1 2011 $356,218 $334,278 $265,000 $140.00 129 319 1683 14.02 Change -1.2% -1.8% -4.5% 0.7% -1.5% 11.5% -4.2% -9.7% Q1 2010 $360,679 $340,471 $277,500 $139.00 131 286 1756 15.53 Attached / Condo Price per Square Foot Sales Q1 2012 $217,276 $212,329 $202,500 $128.00 126 125 460 9.2 Change -1.9% -0. 6.6% -5.2% -10.6% 11.6% -11.0% -12.8% Q1 2011 $221,533 $212,898 $189,950 $135.00 141 112 517 10.55 Change -3.2% -1.8% -2. -6. 11.0% 9.8% -12.4% -17.7% Q1 2010 $228,907 $216,783 $194,425 $144.00 127 102 590 12.82 NestRealty.com 3 of 9

Albemarle County Market Snapshot Sales across Albemarle County were up across the board in Q1 2012. sales tallied in at 229 - the most Q1 sales since 2007. So, even though the Albemarle County five year trend line is negative (below), there is reason to think that could shift at some point later this year. Single family home sales were up 10.8% (from 130 to 144), attached home sales were up 9.4% (53 to 58), and condominiums increased 62.5% (16 to 26). While sales were up across all categories, median prices were mixed: single family home prices are up 10.1%, attached up 20.9%, and condominiums down 2.5%. Five Year Trend of Sales Activity ( Number of Sales) 5 YEAR TREND 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Q2 07 Q3 07 Q4 07 Q1 08 Q2 08 Q3 08 Q4 08 Q1 09 Q2 09 Q3 09 Q4 09 Q1 10 Q2 10 Q3 10 Q4 10 Q1 11 Q2 11 Q3 11 Q4 11 Q1 12 in Q1 - typically an indicator of future sales - were up across all categories also. Single family (up 31.6%), attached (9.), and condominiums (up 22.2%) all saw healthy gains from Q1 2011. Overall inventory levels in Albemarle County were also improved. for all properties fell from 14.06 in March 2011 to 9.38 in March 2012. In addition, total homes for sale also fell slightly from 1069 to 1051 homes. Single Family Q1 2012 433,448 411,751 343,500 99 $147 144 Change -4.2% -3.8% 0. -16.8% -3.9% -12.2% Q4 2011 452,328 427,972 342,500 119 $153 164 Q1 2012 433,448 411,751 343,500 99 $147 144 Attached Q1 2012 241,575 241,114 238,227 93 $130 58 Change -6.1% -6.1% 3.6% 32.9% 9.2% -12.1% Q4 2011 257,392 256,715 230,000 70 $119 66 Q1 2012 241,575 241,114 238,227 93 $130 58 Change -8.2% -6.4% 10.1% -33.1% -2.0% 10.8% Change 13.2% 16.9% 20.9% -24.4% 4.0% 9.4% Q1 2011 472,281 439,882 312,000 148 $150 130 Q1 2011 213,475 206,299 197,000 123 $125 53 Condos Q1 2012 155,726 151,240 101,200 173 $110 26 Change 9.6% 10.8% -22.1% 35.2% 0.9% 44.4% Q4 2011 142,022 136,544 129,900 128 $109 18 Q1 2012 155,726 151,240 101,200 173 $110 26 Change 10.2% 13.0% -2.5% -2. -7.6% 62.5% Q1 2011 141,281 133,867 103,750 177 $119 16 Single Family 212 279 31.6% Attached 75 82 9. Condos 27 33 22.2% NestRealty.com 4 of 9

Albemarle County Market Snapshot (Part 2) Albemarle County Sales by Sub-Area Albemarle County Sales by Type 10% 14% 11% 17% 14% 25% 8% 6 20% 14% 29 North Rio Earlysville Southside Crozet Ivy Keswick Barracks Single Family Attached Condos Earlysville continues to be an area that is struggling a bit within Albemarle County. This past quarter, only of sales were in Earlysville. However, we are hearing of more sales coming down the pipeline, so we d expect this percentage to increase a little in Q2. Crozet had a strong Q1 with 20% of the total sales, taking the top spot previously held by Southside. Sales in the 29 North area jumped from 11% in Q4 2011 to 14% this past quarter. Once again, single family homes made up approximately 2 out of every 3 sales in Albemarle County: a trend that has held true for several quarters in a row. Albemarle County Percent of Sales by Price Range Q1 12 44% 38% 11% 4% Q4 11 44% 37% 1 4% Q3 11 42% 42% 10% 2% Q2 11 39% 4 12% 2% 4% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 0-250K 250K-500K 500K-750K 750-1M 1M+ Home sale price distribution stayed fairly steady in Albemarle County. In Q1 2012, 82% of sales were at or below $500,000. This stays in line with the previous three quarters. However, there is a slight trend towards more home sales in the sub-$250,000 market. Sales in that price category have increased from 39% of the total market to 44% over the last two quarters. We expect this trend to continue as many homebuyers are not pushing their personal financial limits and are opting to buy conservatively instead. NestRealty.com 5 of 9

Charlottesville City Market Snapshot The Charlottesville City real estate market has struggled mightily over the last 12-18 months. When other sub-markets were showing signs of recovery, City home sales were still lagging. However, the City market seems to have turned a corner. sales were up from 74 to 85. While condominium (26 to 20) and attached (8 to 6) sales were both down, single family home sales increased over 40% (from 42 to 59). The overall trend line for the City looks more pronounced than it does for Albemarle. This is due in part to the fact that 2008 was a much stronger year for sales in the City than in the County. The sales decline began much later in the City. Five Year Trend of Sales Activity ( Number of Sales) 5 YEAR TREND 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Q2 07 Q3 07 Q4 07 Q1 08 Q2 08 Q3 08 Q4 08 Q1 09 Q2 09 Q3 09 Q4 09 Q1 10 Q2 10 Q3 10 Q4 10 Q1 11 Q2 11 Q3 11 Q4 11 Q1 12 While overall sales were up, median prices have taken a year-over-year hit. prices are down across all categories: Single family (-4.), attached (-26.2%), and condominiums (-26.3). The reduction in prices likely has had a positive impact on generating more sales. Future sales look bright in Charlottesville: contracts written are up significantly. While contracts written on condos were flat, single family (up over 54%) and attached (up 160%) are trending very positively. Single Family Q1 2012 296,424 282,165 246,500 98 $149 59 Change -9.1% -7.2% 1.6% -10.9% -10.2% 13.5% Q4 2011 326,229 304,188 242,500 110 $166 52 Q1 2012 296,424 282,165 246,500 98 $149 59 Attached Q1 2012 232,316 211,883 140,250 165 $109 6 Change 29.8% 24.5% -11.0% 15.4% 7.9% 0.0% Q4 2011 178,963 170,250 157,500 143 $101 6 Q1 2012 232,316 211,883 140,250 165 $109 6 Change -0.9% 0.2% -4. -3.0% 0.0% 40.5% Change 16.4% 8.5% -26.2% 91.9% 0.0% -25.0% Q1 2011 298,985 281,582 257,500 101 $149 42 Q1 2011 199,625 195,362 190,000 86 $109 8 Condos Q1 2012 217,280 209,040 161,950 131 $196 20 Change 14.8% 16.0% 9.5% 12.9% -17.6% 81.8% Q4 2011 189,204 180,279 147,900 116 $238 11 Q1 2012 217,280 209,040 161,950 131 $196 20 Change -31.6% -31.8% -26. -27.6% 4. -23.1% Q1 2011 317,458 306,605 219,657 181 $188 26 Single Family 62 96 54.84% Attached 5 13 160.00% Condos 23 23 0.00% NestRealty.com 6 of 9

Charlottesville City Market Snapshot (Part 2) Charlottesville City Sales by Elementary School Area Charlottesville City Sales by Type 16% 21% 24% 16% 7% 1 24% 69% 10% Burnley Moran Clark Greenbrier Jackson-Via Johnson Venable Single Family Attached Condos By school district, Clark continues to hold the top position in terms of number of sales. Sales in Venable dropped from 22% of the market to 16% in Q1. After a sluggish Q4 2011, sales in Burnley Moran jumped to 21% (from 1) of the total City sales. In terms of property type, single family homes have, and continue to, dominate the Charlottesville market. Almost 7 out of every 10 sales in the City is a single family home. If the market continues to gain steam and new developments begin, this percentage may shift slightly towards more town homes. Charlottesville City Percent of Sales by Price Range Q1 12 61% 3 1% 1% Q4 11 59% 3 Q3 11 61% 3 4% 1% 1% Q2 11 55% 35% 6% 2% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 0-250K 250K-500K 500K-750K 750-1M 1M+ The sub-$250,000 market in the City continues to grow. Over the last year, there have been more and more sales in the under $250k price category and that trend continued in Q1 where 61% of sales fit into that category. The upper end market in the City has stayed relatively steady. However, there were only 2 total sales above $750,000 in Q1, which was down slightly from 4 in Q4 2011. NestRealty.com 7 of 9

Fluvanna County Overall Q1 2012 $214,188 $203,222 $180,000 123 66 290 10.74 Change -13.9% -14.5% -14. 26.8% 50.0% -11.6% -34.5% Q1 2011 $248,825 $237,704 $210,000 97 44 328 16.4 Change 11.4% 8.8% 5.1% 2.1% -22.8% -8.9% -13.4% Q1 2010 $223,323 $218,520 $199,900 95 57 360 18.94 Coming off of a great Q4 2011, Fluvanna had a very positive Q1 2012. sales this past quarter were up 50% from Q1 2011 (44 to 66) - this represents one of the biggest sales increases in the entire region. In other positive news: total inventory was down 11.6% and fell from 16.4 to 10.74 months - a whopping 34.5% improvement. The sales increases did come at a bit of a cost: median prices fell 14. to $180,000. Most of the Fluvanna news is good, though: especially when you take into account that contracts written were also up 12.5%. Looking forward, we ll be keeping an eye on the proposed 20% property tax hike in Fluvanna - if that passes, it could negatively impact sales and values in the Fluvanna real estate market. 80 90 12.5% Greene County Q1 2012 $215,624 $206,287 $190,000 106 49 255 10.2 Overall Change -12.5% -14.4% -21.6% -13.1% 28.9% 14.9% -21.8% Q1 2011 $246,305 $241,055 $242,287 122 38 222 13.05 Change -17.9% -17.8% -8.7% -5.4% 18.8% 4.2% -14.2% Q1 2010 $300,174 $293,301 $265,450 129 32 213 15.21 Greene County sales improved for the 2nd straight Q1, with Q1 2012 sales tallying 49. This represents an increase of almost 29% year-over-year. Other indicators in Greene were mixed. prices fell 21.6% to $190,000. Days fell for the 2nd straight Q1 with an average DOM of 106. In terms of inventory: even though total inventory increased 14.9% to 255 total units, fell 21.8% to 10.2 months. Based on the fact that contracts written in Q1 were down 20., total sales may lag a bit in Q2 2012. 69 55-20. NestRealty.com 8 of 9

Louisa County Q1 2012 $214,358 $221,302 $224,900 79 31 181 16.45 Overall Change 0.1% 6.7% 11.9% -2.5% 3. -10.8% -19.0% Q1 2011 $214,084 $207,445 $201,000 81 30 203 20.3 Change -20.7% -23.9% -20.9% -35.7% 11.1% -19.8% -3.7% Q1 2010 $270,023 $272,546 $254,000 126 27 253 21.08 After an extremely positive Q4, Louisa experienced continued good news in Q1. Sales were up ever-so-slightly (3.). However, this is the 2nd straight Q1 of sales increases. and months of inventory continue to fall, which is great news for Louisa. inventory dropped 10.8% in March and came down an additional 19% (16.45 months). prices even popped a bit: up 11.9% to $224,900. However, contracts written fell slightly: down 13.1% from 84 to 73. 84 73-13.1% Nelson County Q1 2012 $279,565 $252,591 $244,750 240 36 320 40 Overall Change -15.5% -16.2% -5.9% 47.2% -20.0% -9. 58.7% Q1 2011 $330,674 $301,499 $260,000 163 45 353 25.21 Change 6.7% 5.1% 18.7% -9.4% 4.7% -6.1% 20.7% Q1 2010 $310,046 $286,995 $219,000 180 43 376 20.88 Nelson continues on its roller coaster ride. After some negative news about the financial health of Wintergreen Resort in Q1, it doesn t surprise us that sales numbers and statistics weren t pretty in Q1. Although median sales were only down 5.9% year-over-year, almost every other indicator was negative. Days skyrocketed to 240 DOM (up 47.2%). sales dropped from 45 to 36 (a 20% drop). While inventory did come down about 9%, jumped over 58% to a 40 month supply. That s by far the largest supply level in the Charlottesville MSA. Don t expect things to turn around in Nelson any time soon: contracts written were off almost 35% in Q1. 49 32-34.7% *Some statistics in this report come courtesy of the Charlottesville Area MLS as of 4/15/12. NestRealty.com 9 of 9