Status of SOLARIS Arkadiusz Kisiel

Similar documents
The Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation

Status of SOLARIS. Paweł Borowiec On behalf of Solaris Team

Status of Elettra, top-up and other upgrades

PEP II Design Outline

SPEAR 3: Operations Update and Impact of Top-Off Injection

Status of RF Power and Acceleration of the MAX IV - LINAC

Status of BESSY II and berlinpro. Wolfgang Anders. Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin for Materials and Energy (HZB) 20th ESLS-RF Meeting

New Filling Pattern for SLS-FEMTO

Diamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes

North Damping Ring RF

AARHUS UNIVERSITET November, ASTRID2 Status. Heine Dølrath Thomsen on behalf of the ASTRID2 Team

Top-Up Experience at SPEAR3

Digital BPMs and Orbit Feedback Systems

Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation

LLRF at SSRF. Yubin Zhao

ANKA RF System - Upgrade Strategies

ILC Damping Ring Lattice Status Report. Louis Emery and Aimin Xiao Argonne National Laboratory Presented at KEK workshop Dec 18th, 2007

EUROFEL-Report-2007-DS EUROPEAN FEL Design Study

30 GHz Power Production / Beam Line

Production of quasi-monochromatic MeV photon in a synchrotron radiation facility

RF considerations for SwissFEL

PEP-II STATUS REPORT *

Present Status and Future Upgrade of KEKB Injector Linac

Introduction to Synchrotron Radiation and Storage Ring Light Sources.

3 cerl. 3-1 cerl Overview. 3-2 High-brightness DC Photocathode Gun and Gun Test Beamline

Accelerator Systems of the TPS

COMMISSIONING RESULTS OF BEAM DIAGNOSTICS FOR THE PETRA III LIGHT SOURCE

PEP II STATUS AND PLANS *

4.4 Injector Linear Accelerator

EPJ Web of Conferences 95,

Summary of the 1 st Beam Line Review Meeting Injector ( )

COMMISSIONING OF THE ALBA FAST ORBIT FEEDBACK SYSTEM

Development of an Abort Gap Monitor for High-Energy Proton Rings *

OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AT J-PARC

STATUS OF THE SWISSFEL C-BAND LINEAR ACCELERATOR

The basic parameters of the pre-injector are listed in the Table below. 100 MeV

KARA and FLUTE RF Overview/status

Upgrading LHC Luminosity

PEP II Status and Plans

Tolerances on Magnetic Misalignments in SESAME Storage Ring

Future Performance of the LCLS

2008 JINST 3 S LHC Machine THE CERN LARGE HADRON COLLIDER: ACCELERATOR AND EXPERIMENTS. Lyndon Evans 1 and Philip Bryant (editors) 2

5 Project Costs and Schedule

News from HZB / BESSY Wolfgang Anders at ESLS-RF Meeting September 2010 Trieste

THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER TEST ACCELERATOR: STATUS AND RESULTS * Abstract

BBU threshold current study for 6 GeV beam in 12 GeV beamline setup

Current status of XFEL/SPring-8 project and SCSS test accelerator

Linac 4 Instrumentation K.Hanke CERN

High Brightness Injector Development and ERL Planning at Cornell. Charlie Sinclair Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics

NSLS2 Diagnostic System Commissioning and Measurements

First Simultaneous Top-up Operation of Three Different Rings in KEK Injector Linac

Accelerator Instrumentation RD. Monday, July 14, 2003 Marc Ross

A Facility for Accelerator Physics and Test Beam Experiments

LHC Beam Instrumentation Further Discussion

LEP OPERATION AND PERFORMANCE WITH ELECTRON-POSITRON COLLISIONS AT 209 GEV

ANKA Status Report. N.Smale, A.-S. Müller, E. Huttel, M.Schuh Slides courtesy of A.-S. Müller and C.Heske.

Status of the X-ray FEL control system at SPring-8

CERN S PROTON SYNCHROTRON COMPLEX OPERATION TEAMS AND DIAGNOSTICS APPLICATIONS

Hall-B Beamline Commissioning Plan for CLAS12

Characterizing Transverse Beam Dynamics at the APS Storage Ring Using a Dual-Sweep Streak Camera

IOT OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE ON ALICE AND EMMA AT DARESBURY LABORATORY

SUMMARY OF THE ILC R&D AND DESIGN

Detailed Design Report

Recent APS Storage Ring Instrumentation Developments. Glenn Decker Advanced Photon Source Beam Diagnostics March 1, 2010

Bunch-by-bunch feedback and LLRF at ELSA

ANKA Status Report. N.Smale, on behalf of all ANKA colleagues, Directors : A.-S. Müller, C Heske, T Baumbach.

AREAL- Phase 1. B. Grigoryan on behalf of AREAL team

Week 0: PPS Certification and Processing. Mon Feb 11 Tue Feb 12 Wed Feb 13 Thu Feb 14 Fri Feb 15 Sat Feb 16 Sun Feb 17

COMMISSIONING SCENARIOS FOR THE J-PARC ACCELERATOR COMPLEX

Precision measurements of beam current, position and phase for an e+e- linear collider

An Operational Diagnostic Complement for Positrons at CEBAF/JLab

NSLS-II RF BEAM POSITION MONITOR COMMISSIONING UPDATE

A Fifteen Year Perspective on the Design and Performance of the SNS Accelerator

FINAL DESIGN OF ILC RTML EXTRACTION LINE FOR SINGLE STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR

Activities on FEL Development and Application at Kyoto University

CONSTRUCTION AND COMMISSIONING OF BEPCII

Operational Status of PF-Ring and PF-AR after the Earthquake

Spear3 RF System Sam Park 11/06/2003. Spear3 RF System. High Power Components Operation and Control. RF Requirement.

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 19 Nov 2013

TESLA FEL-Report

Periodic Seasonal Variation of Magnets Level of the STB ring

LHC Nominal injection sequence

2 Work Package and Work Unit descriptions. 2.8 WP8: RF Systems (R. Ruber, Uppsala)

RUNNING EXPERIENCE OF FZD SRF PHOTOINJECTOR

TWO BUNCHES WITH NS-SEPARATION WITH LCLS*

TITLE PAGE. Title of paper: PUSH-PULL FEL, A NEW ERL CONCEPT Author: Andrew Hutton. Author Affiliation: Jefferson Lab. Requested Proceedings:

STATUS OF THE SwissFEL C-BAND LINAC

Extraction/Separator Setup. Michael Spata Operations Stay Treat July 16, 2015

LCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems

LCLS Injector Technical Review

Sérgio Rodrigo Marques

Report on the LCLS Injector Technical Review

Commissioning of Accelerators. Dr. Marc Munoz (with the help of R. Miyamoto, C. Plostinar and M. Eshraqi)

LEP Status and Performance in 2000

PEP-I1 RF Feedback System Simulation

The PEFP 20-MeV Proton Linear Accelerator

Jae-Young Choi On behalf of PLS-II Linac team

FIRST SIMULTANEOUS TOP-UP OPERATION OF THREE DIFFERENT RINGS IN KEK INJECTOR LINAC

CLEX (CLIC Experimental Area)

Fast Orbit Feedback at the SLS. Outline

Transcription:

Status of SOLARIS Arkadiusz Kisiel Solaris National Synchrotron Light Source Jagiellonian University Czerwone Maki 98 30-392 Kraków www.synchrotron.uj.edu.pl Arkadiusz.Kisiel@uj.edu.pl On behalf of SOLARIS Team The XXIV European Synchrotron Light Source Workshop, A. Kisiel, 28-30.11.2016, Lund, Sweden

Outline Solaris overview Previous year status Curent status and problems during commissioning Near and far future Summary

Solaris Overview SOLARIS - 3rd generation light source facility built in Krakow, Poland at the Jagiellonian University Campus. 1.5 GeV storage ring - replica of the MAX IV 1.5 GeV machine 600 MeV injector and the transfer line based on the same components but unique for Solaris.

Solaris 1.5GeV 1.5GeV Storage Storage ring ring Overview 12 12 DBA DBA Cells Cells 96 96 m m circ. circ. Space Space for for ID s ID s (10 (10 sections) sections) ~3.5 ~3.5 m m 10 straight sections for Ids 10 straight sections for Ids 100 100 MHz MHz RF RF system system 300 300 MHz MHz Landau Landau Cavities Cavities Injection Injection dipole dipole kicker kicker Ramping Ramping PEEM/XAS beamline 600 600 MeV MeV Linac Linac with with RF RF Thermionic Thermionic Gun Gun 6 6 accelerating accelerating structures structures combined combined in in 3 3 units units Accelerating Accelerating gradient gradient 20 20 MeV/m MeV/m S-band S-band 2998.5 2998.5 MHz MHz 3 RF Units : 3 RF Units : -- ScandiNova ScandiNova K2 K2 modulators modulators -- Toshiba Toshiba klystrons klystrons -- SLED SLED cavities cavities U-ARPES beamline

Storage Ring Storage Ring Parameters Value Energy 1.5 GeV 0.3 Current 500 ma 0.2 Circumference 96 m Number of cells 12 Harmonic number 32-0.2 Horizontal emittance 5.982 nm rad -0.3 Coupling 1% 6-0.4 Tunes Qx, Qy 11.22, 3.15 4-0.5 2-22.96, -17.14-0.6 Natural chromaticities ξx, ξy Momentum compaction 3.055 x 10-3 Momentum acceptance 4% Bunch length without/with LC 1.4 cm / 6 cm Overall Lifetime 13 hrs Storage Ring Lattice 22 20 0.1 16 0.0 Dispersion [m] Betafunctions [m] 18 14-0.1 12 10 8 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Optics design by S.C. Leemann - MAXIV MAXIV Facility, DDR, 3, http://www.maxlab.lu.se/maxlab/max4/ddr_public

Last year status - Basic accelerator physics studies were optimized: tunes: Qx=11.2204, Qy= 3.1503, chromaticity: ξx= +0.91, ξy= +0.89, orbit response, disperssion function - Max. injected beam current: 200 ma @ 517 MeV - Max. ramped beam current: 132 ma @ 1505 MeV (lossy ramping) - Beam lifetime: 2.6 h @ 20 ma current (I*τ = 0.052 A.h)

Last year aims - Improvement of stored beam current at nominal energy - Installation of Landau cavities - Reducing RMS of closed orbit - Starting of beamlines commissioning - Beam lifetime improvement

Beam current - 27th May 2016 596 ma at the injection energy - then interlock due to the vacuum trip in RF cavity

Beam current - from June 2016 up to 600 ma possible to accumulate without interlocks (at 525 MeV energy) History of stored beam current

Beam current - 9th June 2016: 408 ma ramped to final 1.5 GeV energy, I*τ = 0.62 A.h - beam were stored for about 20 min then vacuum interlock in main RF cavity occured - then vacuum leak on first cavity were observed 500 I [ma] 400 300 200 100 I [ma] @ 525 MeV I [ma] @ 1.5 GeV 0 Accumulated Beam Dose [A.h]

Broken ceramic - ceramic on the main cavity pickup was broken - it happened several times...for example last week

Closed orbit - BBA - Beam Based Alignment was performed to optimize the SVD based global orbit correction - All offsets are < 0.6 mm - RMS of vertical closed orbit was decreased from 170 um (before BBA) down to 48 um

Closed orbit - BBA - Beam Based Alignment was performed to optimize the SVD based global orbit correction - All offsets are < 0.6 mm - RMS of horizontal closed orbit was NOT decreased due to huge ''misalignment'' in the centre of DBA2 What was the cause of this problem?

DBA2 investigation - This achromat is a prototype one and differs from others (different manufacturing process, performance ). - It does not seems to affect the optics, but it has some consequences in orbit correction. - It was corrected in software by applying fixed offset to the BPM.

Final closed orbit After few BBA iterations: Horizontal RMS: from 700 um to 66 um Vertical RMS: from 1090 um to 52 um

Consequences - one corrector magnet is operating at almost full current (9.8 A/10 Amax) - global orbit correction stops after some time (few hours max.) due to exceeding 10 A current limit on power supply - connector on DBA was burned and shielding were melted all connector pannels should be replaced.

Other malfunction - Shunting resistor plate had to be changed because original design were not suitable for the power dissipation. - Shunting of DBA2 is needed to be reconsideren in order to compensate the difference of this achromat relative to others

Orbit drift Automatic orbit correction switches off during beam decay what causes long-term orbit drifts as presented on the picture: Beam decay for 36 hours: - Horizontal drift: ~65 um -Vertical drift: ~27 um

Landau cavities - two 3rd harmonic (300 MHz), normal conductive Landau cavities were installed to dump longitudinal instabilities and improve beam lifetime - passive cavities can be detuned from the resonance by insterting the plunger

Tuning Landau cavities - Two types of tuning mechanisms are used in Landau cavities: endplates (slow detuning) and plunger (fast detuning). - Plungers can be moved in the range from 0 mm (extracted) to 80 mm (inserted). - This allows to change the frequency by 600 khz above the resonance. - Now, with extracted plunger, Landaus are tuned 30-60 khz above the 3rd harmonics of main cavity. - Proper Landau tuning is very difficult due to no possibility to measure bunch length or shape (diagnostic beamline needed)

Tuning Landau cavities - Without Landau Cavities- bunch lenth is ~1.5 cm. - Signal from pickup indicates ~10 times more (button BPM with long cabling seems not be suitable for measuring high frequencies) Beam signal spectrum around 500 MHz (left) and single bunch pulse in time domain (right)

Tuning Landau cavities - Signal width increased and shape influenced by detuning toward 3rd harmonic, beam lifetime increased (from 6hr to 9.5 hr) - Less sidebands on the spectrum Beam signal spectrum around 500 MHz (left) and single bunch pulse in time domain (right)

Tuning Landau cavities - Signal width increased and bunch splitted(?), beam lifetime decreased (from optimal 9.5 hr to 7 hr) - A lot of sidebands on the spectrum Beam signal spectrum around 500 MHz (left) and single bunch pulse in time domain (right)

Tuning Landau cavities - Signal width increased and bunch splitted and far apart(?), beam lifetime increased much more than at 20 mm (9 hr with plungers @ 20 mm, 13.5 hr with plungers @ 0 mm) Beam signal spectrum around 500 MHz (left) and single bunch pulse in time domain (right)

Vacuum system Poor vacuum in straght sectins. Conditioning very slow and non efective.

Vacuum system Installation of Landau cavities during the winter shutdown and commissioning start marked with red circle H2 has major impact on gas composition. During normal operation with the beam H2 decreases and CO increases.

UARPES beamline

UARPES commissioning 22.04.2016 first light after first mirror!

UARPES first results First angle-resolved experiment at the UARPES beamline. Graphene on SiC(0001) Dirac cone Energy Mean ring current: 40 ma Photon energy 50 ev 3D mode time 4h 30 min (full dataset) Electron energy resolution ~20 mev Room temperature X m tu n e om m 3D projection film coming. Y momentum Piotr Ciochon, Mariusz Garb, Karolina Szamota-Leandersson, Jacek Kolodziej

Future plans 1. Second beamline (PEEM/XAS) is being preapared to open for the synchrotron radiation. 2. Next beamline PHELIX (soft X-ray beamline) was founded in May 2016 and the construction has started operation in 2020 3. Old MAX-Lab beamline I1011 transferred to Solaris waiting for financial support for installation 4. Application for money for next two beamlines (Infra red beamline and hard Xray beamline) 5. Start of user operation in 2017 6. Accelerator studies: - LOCO - Touschek lifetime - Beam instabilities - Dynamic aperture

Future plans 7.Increasing the performance of the storage ring: much more accumulated current, better vacuum conditions, more stable beam. 8. Installation of HOM filters 9. Machine improvements: completing the chopper, changing pickup in main cavities to non-ceramic, diagnostic beamline, emittance measurement setup etc.

Summary - After one year of commissioning a good performance of the Solaris light source has been achieved. - Injection to the storage ring occurs at 525 MeV and the beam is ramped to the operating energy of 1.5 GeV. - The injection efficiency has been improved reaching now 20% and is still under optimisation. - The maximum injected current achieved at 525 MeV has been 596 ma at the filling pattern of 2/3. - The maximum current ramped to the final energy of 1.5 GeV is above 400 ma due to poor performance of the ceramic gap in main cavity pickup. - The optics was corrected close to the design one. However some adjustments are still needed. - Next step is to calculate the linear optics from the orbit (LOCO) and optimise the beta functions with the UARPES EPU in operation. - Taking into account the closed orbit some of the magnets need realignment, which should improve the orbit and relax the corrector strengths. - Commissioning of UARPES beamline in progress

Thank you for your attention!