Must-Carry and Retransmission Consent 2017

Similar documents
47 USC 534. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

47 USC 535. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

ADVISORY Communications and Media

2015 Rate Change FAQs

Reauthorizing the Satellite Home Viewing Provisions in the Communications Act and the Copyright Act: Issues for Congress

Comments on Recommendations of ECTEL to the NTRC on Revised Draft Electronic Communications Bill

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER AND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION

LINKS: Programming Disputes. Viacom Networks Negotiations. The Facts about Viacom Grande Agreement Renewal:

Reauthorizing the Satellite Home Viewing Provisions in the Communications Act and the Copyright Act: Issues for Congress

THE FAIR MARKET VALUE

CRS Report for Congress

RATE INCREASE FAQs. Can you tell me what one TV station/network costs? I am in a promotional package, are my rates changing now too?

Digital Television Transition in US

RATE INCREASE FAQs. Can you tell me what one TV station/network costs?

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF ITTA THE VOICE OF AMERICA S BROADBAND PROVIDERS

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

SOME PROGRAMMING BASICS: PERSPECTIVE FROM A SATELLITE LAWYER MICHAEL NILSSON HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP MAY 2008

S Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

July 3, 2012 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TABLE OF CONTENTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Charles B. Goldfarb Specialist in Telecommunications Policy. January 3, CRS Report for Congress

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM. TRIBUNE TELEVISION COMPANY (COMPANY) WXIN/WTTV (STATION) Indianapolis, IN (DESIGNATED MARKET AREA)

Welcome to the Online Public Inspection File Webinar: A Refresher Course

UTILITIES (220 ILCS 5/) Public Utilities Act.

Testimony of Gigi B. Sohn President, Public Knowledge

COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Broadcasting Decision CRTC

March 9, Legal Memorandum. ATSC 3.0 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Comments Due May 9; Reply Comments Due June 8

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

Julie S. Omelchuck Mt. Hood Cable Regulatory Commission

WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMORANDUM

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

WikiLeaks Document Release

2018 TELEVISION ANIMATION AGREEMENTS. Referendum Booklet

Appendix S: Franchising and Cable TV

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

PYRAMID ( ) TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM. Southeastern Ohio TV System (COMPANY) WHIZ-TV (STATION) Zanesville, OH (MARKET)

SIDELETTER ON LITERARY MATERIAL WRITTEN FOR PROGRAMS MADE FOR NEW MEDIA. As of February 13, 2008 Revised as of May 2, 2011

Local Television Station Music Performance Per Program License

Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC

RIDER CATCH-UP RIGHTS 1

AUSTRALIAN SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION AND RADIO ASSOCIATION

Broadcasting Order CRTC

Reauthorization of the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act (STELA)

OECD COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 2001 Broadcasting Section

CANADIAN CABLE SYSTEMS ALLIANCE INC.

Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC

ARTICLE 23. OTHER USES OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Telecommuncations - Recent Developments

FRANCHISE FEE AUDITS & RENEWALS:

RECENT FRANCHISE RENEWAL PEG ACCESS OUTCOMES (re HD, VOD, EPG, Funding)

STATE OF NEW JERSEY Board of Public Utilities Two Gateway Center Newark, NJ

Ensure Changes to the Communications Act Protect Broadcast Viewers

Metuchen Public Educational and Governmental (PEG) Television Station. Policies & Procedures

January 11, Re: Notice of Ex parte presentation in MB Docket No.07-57

BMI. Local Television Station Music Performance Per Program License

Licensing & Regulation #379

ARNOLD PORTER LLP FCC RELEASES FINAL DTV TRANSITION RULES CLIENT ADVISORY JANUARY 2008 SUMMARY OF DECISION 1

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

The Jon Vickers Film Scoring Award 2017/2019 Entry Form and Agreement

Title VI in an IP Video World

US Digital TV Business Models [Slides]

DONNY & MARIE ( )

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Policy on the syndication of BBC on-demand content

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FORM. Meredith Corporation (COMPANY) WSMV Nashville, TN (MARKET)

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

S4C Guidelines on Credits. 1 May 2015

Sacred Mysteries Distribution PO Box Boulder, CO or

RICHARD J. RIORDAN MAYOR FEASIBILITY OF ACQUIRING CAPACITY FOR OVER- THE-AIR BROADCAST OF LA CITYVIEW CHANNEL 3S

March 10, Re: Notice of Ex parte presentation in MB Docket No.07-57

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FORM. Lin Television Corporation (LICENSEE) for the Station(s) WANE-TV (STATION(S)) broadcasting in

Cable Rate Regulation Provisions

SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP (COMPANY) See Rider A attached (STATION) See Rider A attached (DESIGNATED MARKET AREA)

CHAPTER 98: CABLE TELEVISION Tampering with city cable system prohibited Fees

2018 Student Film Festival Submission Rules and Guidelines

CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING, INC. (COMPANY) WHP/WLYH (STATION) HARRISBURG, PA (MARKET)

Submission to Inquiry into subscription television broadcasting services in South Africa. From Cape Town TV

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART III, SECTION 4 TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

ORDINANCE NO

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS

OECD COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 2001 Broadcasting Section

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPORT ON CABLE INDUSTRY PRICES

[MB Docket Nos , ; MM Docket Nos , ; CS Docket Nos ,

Your Sky Q Contracts SKYQUK 0917

Your submission has been accepted

Music Business Handbook and Career Guide, 10th Ed Sherwood Publishing Partners. Chapter 4

COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 1999

Post- Newsweek (COMPANY) WDIV (STATION) Detroit (MARKET) For the Distribution Broadc a s t Rights to the Sony Pictur e s Television Inc.

LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS PROFILES AND TRENDS FOR 2014 AND BEYOND

HATHWAY CABLE & DATACOM LIMITED

The NBCU Comcast Joint Venture

The NBCU-Comcast Joint Venture

Screen Actors Guild of America (SAG) Directors Guild of America (DGA) Writers Guild of America (WGA) Television Agreement

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM SINCLAIR BROADCASTING GROUP (LICENSEE) for the station(s) See Rider A attached (STATION(S))

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. Washington, D.C FORM 10-K

Announcement by Society ARTISJUS Hungarian Bureau for the Protection of Authors Rights (Cable 18)

2018 NETWORK TELEVISION CODE. Referendum Booklet

Transcription:

Welcome to Must-Carry and Retransmission Consent 2017 The program will start shortly. Please make sure that the volume on your computer s speakers is turned up.

Must-Carry and Retransmission Consent 2017 DANIEL KIRKPATRICK Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, P.L.C. 1300 N. 17 th Street 11 th Floor Arlington, Virginia 22209 703-812-0432 kirkpatrick@fhhlaw.com August 22, 2017

Must-Carry/Retransmission Consent Background and Basics Pre-1992 Prior versions of must-carry 1992 Cable Act Established current Must Carry/Retransmission Consent regime Stations can choose: mandatory carriage (must-carry) or carriage only with permission of the station (retransmission consent) 1999 Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act (SHVIA) established similar regime for DBS

Must-Carry/Retransmission Consent Background and Basics Retransmission Consent: Must-Carry: >No obligation to carry station >If carried, station can demand compensation >Guaranteed carriage (under certain circumstances) >No compensation Carry one, carry all: >DBS version of must-carry

Election and Default Status Elections between must-carry and retransmission consent status required every three years (by Oct. 1). If station fails to make an affirmative election: >Defaults to must-carry on cable systems >Carriage, but no compensation >Defaults to retransmission consent on satellite (Dish and DirecTV) >Carriage only by negotiated agreement

Why You Need to Elect Affirmative election is almost always the best approach. >For station needing must-carry, failure to elect could result in loss of carriage (satellite) or channel position (cable). >For station that can get retransmission consent revenue, failure to elect would pass up such revenue. >Failure to properly elect could result in breach of network affiliation agreements, financing agreements, or other contracts.

Who Can Elect Commercial full power TV stations Qualified Noncommercial stations have must carry rights; election not required but advisable. Small number of Class A and LPTV stations have limited must-carry rights.

Who Can Elect Qualified Class A or LPTV Stations Have right to elect must-carry on cable systems where: > primary headend w/in 35 miles of station; and >station community of license and cable franchise area both outside top 160 MSAs as of 1990; and >there is no full power TV station licensed to the county served by the cable system.

Who Can Elect Qualified Class A or LPTV Stations (cont.) >fulfill full power TV requirements for political ads and kidvid; and >minimum hours of operation (28/wk- LP;18/day-CA); and >meet local news and informational programming needs; and >deliver good quality signal to cable headend only over-the-air >No must-carry rights on satellite

Where Can You Elect Commercial Full Power Stations >Default is station s DMA (as defined by Nielsen in 2015-2016 Station Index). >Must-carry market may have been modified for individual stations by FCC order (may have removed or added counties or communities to a station s must-carry market) >If community of license is outside DMA, county in which community is located is also part of must-carry market. >In areas outside of a station s DMA, carriage is pursuant to retransmission consent only.

How to Find Cable Systems to Send Election Notices to FCC COALS database (will provide an official address for sending elections to registered cable systems) Existing agreements Trade publications; Nielsen materials Franchising authorities

Considerations in Making Election Does cable or satellite operator have right to import distant signals? Does station have network nonduplication/syndicated exclusivity protection? >Satellite can carry significantly viewed (if authorized) as long as subscriber receives the local package, not necessarily your station >Do neighboring market network stations have out-of-market distribution rights?

Considerations in Making Election (continued ) Could area served by cable system be removed from station s must-carry market? Factors in market modification evaluation include: >Over-the-air signal coverage >Historical and current cable carriage >Economic and social links to community >Coverage of community issues in station programming >Evidence of viewership >If station is in state

Considerations in Making Election (continued ) Consistency among operators in same area (rules prohibit inconsistent elections in a single franchise area) Other factors that could lead to loss of must-carry rights: >Duplication of programming (50% or more) >Multiple in-market network affiliates (cable system only required to carry closest) >Lack of good quality signal to headend

Carriage Issues for Must-Carry Stations -Manner of carriage -- Cable 1. No Material Degradation >No perceptible difference from over-air signal quality >No discrimination vs. non-broadcast channels >HD broadcast must be carried in HD downconversion to SD allowed to fulfill requirement to make mc signals available to all subscribers (basic tier)

Carriage Issues for Must-Carry Stations -Manner of carriage Cable 2. Viewability: Viewers with analog sets must be able to view MC signals cable ops must downconvert or supply equipment (converter boxes) either free or at low cost. -Manner of carriage Satellite More flexibility for satellite ops where technically feasible carry MC with same quality as RC stations. HD in HD where at least one market station carried in HD. Satellite operators may use digital compression.

Carriage Issues for Must-Carry Stations(continued ) Channel Positioning - Cable Right to choose one of three options -Over-the-air channel number -Channel on which station was carried on July 19, 1985 or January 1, 1992 -Other mutually agreeable channel Include desired channel in must-carry election (Continued)

Carriage Issues for Must-Carry Stations(continued ) Channel positioning Cable (continued) If no channel requested, cable system may carry on Major or historical (1985 or 1992) channel; if both are occupied by another mustcarry station with placement rights, system can choose channel. Channel placement rights apply on most widely available tier ( basic tier), not necessarily to HD. Basic tier requirement removed for many systems

Carriage Issues for Must-Carry Stations (continued ) Channel positioning - Satellite No right to a specific channel, just to placement contiguous to other local broadcast stations Ability to negotiate even if must-carry, but cable/sat operator cannot receive any valuable consideration in return for channel position.

Issues in Retransmission Agreements -Rates >Depend on many factors -Term >Concurrent with election cycle? >Concurrent with affiliation agreements? >Do you want all agreements expiring at same time? -Channel position -Treatment in on-screen program guides

Issues in Agreements (continued ) -Out of market carriage >Allowed or required? >Check network affiliation agreements for any conflict >Significantly viewed areas? >Compensation? -HD and SD carriage and channel position

Issues in Agreements (continued ) -Multicast channels >How many will be carried >Where will they be carried >Limits on content changes -Signal delivery >If cable operator has fiber, will they provide signal delivery? -Syndicated Exclusivity/network nonduplication

Issues in Agreements (continued ) -Alternative delivery and new technology >TV Everywhere, internet carriage May not have these rights from program suppliers May not want to agree without knowing what conditions networks will impose >Slingbox-type technology >Dish hopper or similar technology

Issues in Agreements (continued ) Alternative delivery and new technology (continued ) >DVR, pausing, rewinding Generally acceptable to suppliers >Other unforeseen technologies Consider limiting grant of rights to specific things included in agreement >Can t grant more than you have from network Out-of-market carriage New technologies, etc.

Issues in Agreements (continued ) -Payment >Rates >Terms for submitting payment > Bulk-billed subscribers >Audit rights >Alternative compensation Advertising Multicast carriage

Issues in Agreements (continued ) -Termination Rights >Cable operator will generally want right to terminate on loss of network affiliation Agreement should make clear if carriage will stop or just payment >Loss of signal >Right to terminate for non-payment How long before triggered

Issues in Agreements (continued ) -Assignments/Acquisitions >Can/must agreement be assigned by either station or cable operator to a new owner? >If station owner buys another station, is it added to this agreement? >If cable operator buys another system, is it added to this agreement?

Issues in Agreements (continued ) -Confidentiality >How long >What is covered - MFN clauses >Fee-only >Specific provisions (e.g., new technologies) >Overall value

Good Faith Negotiations -Explicit standards establishing bad faith: >Refusal to negotiate >Refusal to designate representative >Refusal to negotiate at reasonable times and locations or acting to unreasonably delay negotiations >No joint negotiation by in-market stations >Cannot block satellite from importing significantly viewed stations (Continued)

Good Faith Negotiations (continued ) Explicit standards establishing bad faith (continued ) >Refusal to put forth more than a single, unilateral, take it or leave it proposal >Failure to respond to a proposal, including reasons for rejection >Execution of any agreement that requires the other party to not enter agreement with another station or MVPD >Refusal to execute a written agreement setting forth the full terms of the parties understanding

Good Faith Negotiations (continued ) -Totality of the circumstances test -In disputes, complaints often filed, but FCC very reluctant to actually find bad faith.

Questions? Thank you! DANIEL KIRKPATRICK kirkpatrick@fhhlaw.com 703-812-0432 Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, P.L.C. 1300 N. 17 th Street 11 th Floor Arlington, Virginia 22209 Website: http://www.fhhlaw.com Blog: http://www.commlawblog.com Facebook: CommLawBlog Twitter: @Commlawblog