P802.3av interim, Shanghai, PRC

Similar documents
10G EPON 1G EPON Coexistence

10G Broadcast: Review and Motion

IEEE 802.3ca Channel Bonding And Skew Remediation

Reducing input dynamic range of SOA-preamplifier for 100G-EPON upstream

Proposed NG-EPON wavelength planning decision flow. Ed Harstead, member Fixed Networks Division CTO, Alcatel-Lucent January 2014

C-band Wavelength Plan for 10G EPON Downstream

IEEE P802.3av GEPON Task Force. Meeting Summary and Action Items

100GBASE-DR2: A Baseline Proposal for the 100G 500m Two Lane Objective. Brian Welch (Luxtera)

Cost Effective High Split Ratios for EPON. Hal Roberts, Mike Rude, Jeff Solum July, 2001

40G SWDM4 MSA Technical Specifications Optical Specifications

Data Rate to Line Rate Conversion. Glen Kramer (Broadcom Ltd)

INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION

40G SWDM4 MSA Technical Specifications Optical Specifications

Meeting Minutes Group: IEEE P802.3ca 100G-EPON Task Force

40GBASE-ER4 optical budget

64G Fibre Channel strawman update. 6 th Dec 2016, rv1 Jonathan King, Finisar

50 Gb/s per lane MMF baseline proposals. P802.3cd, Whistler, BC 21 st May 2016 Jonathan King, Finisar Jonathan Ingham, FIT

100G-FR and 100G-LR Technical Specifications

400G-FR4 Technical Specification

Comparison of options for 40 Gb/s PMD for 10 km duplex SMF and recommendations

Improving Frame FEC Efficiency. Improving Frame FEC Efficiency. Using Frame Bursts. Lior Khermosh, Passave. Ariel Maislos, Passave

REPORT/GATE FORMAT. Ed Boyd, Xingtera Supporters: Duane Remein, Huawei

LPI SIGNALING ACROSS CLAUSE 108 RS-FEC

100G CWDM Link Model for DM DFB Lasers. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies May 2013

Optical transmission feasibility for 400GbE extended reach PMD. Yoshiaki Sone NTT IEEE802.3 Industry Connections NG-ECDC Ad hoc, Whistler, May 2016

802.3bj FEC Overview and Status. PCS, FEC and PMA Sublayer Baseline Proposal DRAFT. IEEE P802.3ck

An Effort to Create Multi-vender Environment for 100 Mb/s P2P optical Ethernet Access in Japan

SMF Ad Hoc report. Pete Anslow, Ciena, SMF Ad Hoc Chair. IEEE P802.3bm, Geneva, September 2012

PIN-PD based ONU for 10GE-PON (3)

100GBASE-SR4 Extinction Ratio Requirement. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies September 2013

802.3bj FEC Overview and Status IEEE P802.3bm

Development of optical transmission module for access networks

Low-Power Solution for 10GE-PON

The introduction of a new FTTH Standard in Japan

SOA / PIN based OLT receiver update. David Piehler, Ruomei Mu 17 July 2007

200GBASE-DR4: A Baseline Proposal for the 200G 500m Objective. Brian Welch (Luxtera)

100G MMF 20m & 100m Link Model Comparison. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies March 2013

Meeting Minutes Group: IEEE P802.3ca 100G-EPON Task Force

100G PSM4 & RS(528, 514, 7, 10) FEC. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies September 2012

10G/1G E-PON ONU SFP+ Bidi Optical Transceiver (20km) P3157-8D20-RSP

Analysis on Feasibility to Support a 40km Objective in 50/200/400GbE. Xinyuan Wang, Yu Xu Huawei Technologies

Proposal for 10Gb/s single-lane PHY using PAM-4 signaling

10G E-PON ONU PR-30 Transceiver (20km)

SPCxxB10100D SFP+ Dual Fiber CWDM CWDM / 10dB / 10 Gigabit Ethernet

PMD & MDIO. Jan 11, Irvine, CA. Jonathan Thatcher, Clay Hudgins, IEEE 802.3ae. 10 Gigabit Ethernet

PAM8 Baseline Proposal

Performance Results: High Gain FEC over DMT

500 m SMF Objective Baseline Proposal

Error performance objective for 25 GbE

Recommended Changes to Optical PMD Proposal

Error performance objective for 400GbE

SFCxxB16GExD SFP Dual Fibre CWDM ITU CWDM / 16dB / Gigabit Ethernet

Module 11 : Link Design

Hands-On Real Time HD and 3D IPTV Encoding and Distribution over RF and Optical Fiber

CFPQD010C10D CFP Dual Fibre 1310nm* / 10km / 100GBASE-LR4 & OTN OTU4

SFCxxB24GExD SFP Dual Fibre CWDM CWDM / 24dB / Gigabit Ethernet

IEEE P802.3bs D Gb/s & 400 Gb/s Ethernet Initial Working Group ballot comments

50 Gb/s per lane MMF objectives. IEEE 50G & NGOATH Study Group January 2016, Atlanta, GA Jonathan King, Finisar

10GBASE-LRM Interoperability & Technical Feasibility Report

WDM Video Overlays on EFM Access Networks

10G-BASE-T. Jaime E. Kardontchik Stefan Wurster Carlos Laber. Idaho - June

100G SR4 Link Model Update & TDP. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies January 2013

EEE ALERT signal for 100GBASE-KP4

H5000 Outdoor Mini Virtual HUB

EVLA Fiber Selection Critical Design Review

EPON ONU Triplexer Transceiver

SPDxx040100D SFP+ Dual Fibre DWDM 100GHz DWDM / 40 km / 10 Gigabit Ethernet

Simula'on Study on 100G EPON Wavelength Plan A. Eugene (Yuxin) Dai Cox Communica'ons IEEE 802.3ca 100G EPON TF November, 2016 San Antonio, Texas, USA

Extended Reach, Client-Side SFP, Multi-Rate, Multi-Protocol, DWDM, 3R Transponder WaveReady Transponder 740 XLR

WaveReady WRT Gbps Extended-Reach DWDM Tunable Transponder with XFP Client Interface

FEC Applications for 25Gb/s Serial Link Systems

100GBASE-FR2, -LR2 Baseline Proposal

An Approach To 25GbE SMF 10km Specification IEEE Plenary (Macau) Kohichi Tamura

8 Ports. 16 Ports. ED5219LGT Series. CATV Single Channel EDFA 1310nm Forward Optical Transmitter

EFM Copper Technical Overview EFM May, 2003 Hugh Barrass (Cisco Systems), Vice Chair. IEEE 802.3ah EFM Task Force IEEE802.

In support of 3.5 db Extinction Ratio for 200GBASE-DR4 and 400GBASE-DR4

10GE WAN PHY: Physical Medium Attachment (PMA)

Baseline Proposal for 200 Gb/s Ethernet 40 km SMF 200GBASE-ER4 in 802.3cn

6ch LC duplex QSFP Receiver ROSA (4ch x 6Gbps) + μ-bosa (2.5Gbps) (2km) FVQ2-4R1B-SM2

Stretch More Out of Your Data Centre s Multimode Cabling System

FIBRE CHANNEL CONSORTIUM

RS-FEC Codeword Monitoring for 802.3cd

10G- XFP- SR- AO. 10Gbs XFP Transceiver

Scope: Using Wave Division Multiplexing (WDM) for the Protection Data Interface (PDI) of the 7SD5 / 7SD61.

IEEE P802.3av Interim Meeting Minutes Atlanta, GA, November 2007 Recorded by Robert Lingle, Jr. and Ken Maricondo

INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION

GPON ONU Triplexer Transceiver

Meeting Minutes Group: IEEE P802.3ca 100G-EPON Task Force

OpticalProducts. Illuminating Your Network. Testing the World s Networks

DOCSIS 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business

Systematic Tx Eye Mask Definition. John Petrilla, Avago Technologies March 2009

FEC IN 32GFC AND 128GFC. Scott Kipp, Anil Mehta June v0

10Gbps SFP+ Optical Transceiver, 10km Reach

Prisma D-PON System ONT and Upstream Receiver

Maps of OMA, TDP and mean power. Piers Dawe Mellanox Technologies

Improved extinction ratio specifications. Piers Dawe Mellanox

10Gb/s SFP+ ER 1550nm Cooled EML with TEC, PIN Receiver 40km transmission distance

802.3bj FEC Overview and Status. 400GbE PCS Baseline Proposal DRAFT. IEEE P802.3bs 400 Gb/s Ethernet Task Force

! "#$ ' % & % & ' ( )!' *!+, ( *-"(! './ 0 / 0/ $ 1/ 2$3 1

Digital Backbone Network Applications for Inter-City and Intra-City Regionai CATV Networks

Transcription:

P802.3av interim, Shanghai, PRC 08 09.06.2009 Overview of 10G-EPON compiled by Marek Hajduczenia marek.hajduczenia@zte.com.cn Rev 1.2

P802.3av interim, Shanghai, PRC 08 09.06.2009 IEEE P802.3av 10G-EPON PMD specifications

PMD definitions 3 Some definitions used in Clause 75 P802.3av: Channel Insertion Loss (ChIL) total attenuation of optical channel (fibre, splitters, splices etc.), excluding penalties Power budget total difference between minimum AVP launch power and Rx sensitivity = ChIL + penalties, including: Power budget Symmetric Asymmetric ChiL ODN compatibility PRX10 X 20 PR10 PRX20 X 24 PR20 PRX30 X 29 X PR10 X 20 PR10 PR20 X 24 PR20 PR30 X 29 X

PR-type PMD in ISO/OSI stack 4 OLT ONU MACC OAM MAC MACC MACC OAM OAM MPMC (Clause 77) MAC MAC RS (Clause 76) MACC OAM MAC MACC OAM MPMC (Clause 77) MAC RS (Clause 76) XGMII XGMII Tx: 1577 nm Rx: 1260 1280 nm PCS (Clause 76) PMA (Clause 76) PMD (Clause 75) MDI PCS (Clause 76) PMA (Clause 76) PMD (Clause 75) MDI Tx: 1270 nm Rx: 1574-1580 nm PSC 10.3125 GBd 10.3125 GBd Notes: OAM is optional Green layers in scope of 802.3av Layers: MACC MAC Client OAM Operation And Maintenance MPMC Multipoint MAC Control MAC Media Access Control Layers: RS Reconciliation Sublayer PCS Physical Coding Sublayer PMA Physical Medium Attachment PMD Physical Medium Dependent MDI Medium Dependent Interface

PRX-type PMD in ISO/OSI stack 5 OLT ONU MACC OAM MAC MACC MACC OAM OAM MPMC (Clause 77) MAC MAC RS (Clause 76) MACC OAM MAC MACC OAM MPMC (Clause 77) MAC RS (Clause 76) XGMII (Tx) Tx: 1577 nm Rx: 1260 1310 nm PCS (Clause 76) PMA (Clause 76) PMD (Clause 75) MDI GMII (Rx) XGMII (Rx) GMII (Tx) PCS (Clause 76) PMA (Clause 76) PMD (Clause 75) MDI Tx: 1310 nm Rx: 1574-1580 nm Notes: OAM is optional Green layers in scope of 802.3av XGMII and GMII interfaces are used in single direction only e.g. Tx path in XGMII in OLT PSC 10.3125 GBd 1.25 GBd Layers: MACC MAC Client OAM Operation And Maintenance MPMC Multipoint MAC Control MAC Media Access Control Layers: RS Reconciliation Sublayer PCS Physical Coding Sublayer PMA Physical Medium Attachment PMD Physical Medium Dependent MDI Medium Dependent Interface

Power budgets in Clause 75 6 Power budgets defined in P802.3av 10G-EPON (symmetric and asymmetric) Description Low power budget Medium power budget High power budget PRX10 PR10 PRX20 PR20 PRX30 PR30 Downstream rate 10.3125 GBd Upstream rate 1.25 10.3125 1.25 10.3125 1.25 10.3125 GBd Downstream wavelength 1577 nm Downstream wavelength band 5 [1575 1580] nm Upstream wavelength 1310 1270 1310 1270 1310 1270 nm Upstream wavelength band 100 20 100 20 100 20 nm Nominal maximum reach (min) 10 20 20 km Nominal split 1:16 1:16 1:32 - Maximum ChIL 20 24 29 db Minimum ChIL 5 10 15 db Note: Nominal maximum reach is informative PMDs may support longer reach and remain standard compliant; PRX30 uses 1 Gb/s link parameters which were not included in P802.3ah specifications (29 db ChIL) and based on industrial standard Unit

3 supported power budgets 7 PR10 and PRX10 Channel insertion loss 20 db Specified for the same ODN as PX10 PR20 and PRX20 Channel insertion loss 24 db Specified for the same ODN as PX20 PR30 and PRX30 Channel insertion loss 29 db No 1G-EPON specs for backward compatibility Nominal distance / split ratio for individual power budgets defined in P802.3av 1:16 1:32 10 km PR(X)10 PR(X)20 20 km PR(X)20 PR(X)30 Reach and split factors are nominal i.e. devices exceeding these values are standard compliant!!! Mapping: PMD power budget 10/1GBASE-PRX OLT PMD 10GBASE-PR OLT PMD PRX-D1 PRX-D2 PRX-D3 PR-D1 PR-D2 PR-D3 10/1GBASE-PRX-U1 PRX10 x x x x x ONU PMD 10/1GBASE-PRX-U2 x PRX20 x x x x 10/1GBASE-PRX-U3 x x PRX30 x x x 10GBASE-PR-U1 x x x PR10 PR20 x 10GBASE-PR-U3 x x x x x PR30 PMDs count < power budget count, 10GBASE-PR-U1 used in two power budgets: 10GBASE-PR-D1 uses PIN Rx and 10GBASE-PR-D2 uses APD Rx

PMD name decoder ring Legacy (1G/1G) PMD P for PON X for 8b/10b coding Power budget [10,20] Location [D > OLT, U > ONU] 1000BASE-PX10-D 8 Asymmetric (10G/1G) PMD P for PON R for 64b/66b coding X for 8b/10b coding Location [D > OLT, U > ONU] Configuration [1,2,3] 10/1GBASE-PRX-U1 Symmetric (10G/10G) PMD 10GBASE-PR-D1 P for PON R for 64b/66b coding Location [D > OLT, U > ONU] Configuration [1,2,3]

10G-EPON wavelength allocation plan 9 US for PX10/20 DS for PX10/20 Analog video 802.3ah 802.3av US 1260 US US 1360 US for PR10/20/30 1480 DS 1500 Analog video US for PRX10/20/30 1540 VID VID 1550 Wavelength [nm] DS1 for PR(X)10/20/30 Wavelength [nm] 1600 1580 1575 1550 1540 1360 1280 1260 Band sizes are not-up-to-scale

Dual-rate & burst-mode 10 In order to support legacy 1G ONUs, 10G OLT must be able to: receive 1G / 10G transmissions and identify them on the fly; avoid using any signals from MAC Client layers data rate detection must be performed at the PHY layer (no layer violations); assure minimum sensitivity penalty for 1G signals (none, at best); dual-rate (1G/10G) burst-mode operation is required! 1310 nm near zero dispersion transmission window can be reused Serial and/or parallel configurations APD based configuration can be used for upstream 10G/1G coexistence the parallel configuration with 10G optimized APD is simpler compared to serial configuration half-serial configuration provides about 1 db more sensitivity in 1G mode (see e.g. 3av_0703_effenberger_4.pdf)

Dual-rate 10G-EPON stack 11 MAC 1/1 MAC 10/1 MAC 10/10 MAC RS GMII 10/1G DS 10/1G US OLT 802.3av XGMII PCS PMA PMD 1270 nm 1577 nm 1310 nm 1490 nm PMD PMA PCS GMII GMII XGMII GMII XGMII RS MAC 1/1G ONU 802.3ah 10/1G ONU 802.3av 10/10G ONU 802.3av

1G-EPON & 10G-EPON coexistence Downstream: WDM overlay for 1G and 10G signals Upstream TDMA overlay for 1G / 10G signals (dual rate, burst mode) Already considered as technically feasible (prototypes available) Target configurations: 10/1G in downstream & 10/1G in upstream 10 Gb/s, 1575 1580 nm P802.3av ONU 10G DS / 10G US 12 1 Gb/s, 1480 1490 nm 10G OLT RF Video 1550 1560 nm DOWNSTREAM UPSTREAM P802.3av ONU 10G DS / 1G US 1 Gb/s 1260 1360 nm 10 Gb/s 1260 1280 nm 1 Gb/s 1260 1360 nm 802.3 1G-EPON ONU 1G DS / 1G US

Wrap-up for 10G-EPON PMD 13 Clause 75 PMDs support symmetric and asymmetric operation: WDM separation for downstream dual-rate, burst-mode transmission for upstream 3 power budget classes defined: 20, 24 and 29 db ChIL RS (255,223) FEC is always enabled some PMDs may have to use post/preamplifier (implementation dependent and not standard mandated) Backward compatible with existing P802.3ah equipment evolutionary system upgrade supported P802.3ah ONUs need not be replaced Challenging power budgets result in changes also in the MPCP sublayer (Clause 77) FEC is always enabled Stream-based FEC was chosen instead of frame-based FEC

P802.3av interim, Shanghai, PRC 08 09.06.2009 IEEE P802.3av 10G-EPON PCS / RS specifications

10G-EPON PCS/RS features [1] 10G-EPON PCS and RS significantly extend 10GBASE-X PCS/RS Mandatory, stream-based FEC mechanism (NEW) 64b/66b line code (REUSE) Burst-mode operation of the PMA (NEW): Data detector for the ONU Start_of_Burst and End_of_Burst delimiters Extensions to RS: to support P2P emulation over P2MP plant (NEW, REUSE part of 1G-EPON RS specs) to support XGMII and GMII in asymmetric configuration (NEW) 15

10G-EPON PCS/RS features [2] Strong FEC is specified to achieve the required power budgets RS(255, 223) (higher gain than 802.3ah FEC) Stream-based versus Frame-based (802.3ah FEC) Overhead is constant and equal to 12.9% Overhead is accommodated while maintaining the constant PHY data rate (10.3125 Gbit/s): No internal interface is super-rated, XGMII rate is preserved (312.5M transfers/s) PHY line rate is preserved (10.3125 Gbit/s) Data throughput is reduced: inter-frame gaps are increased through extended operation of MPCP, which accounts for FEC parity insertion Extra IDLEs are deleted in PCS and used to insert FEC partiy code in the FEC encoder (see two next slides) 16

17 10G-EPON data path

10G-EPON Data Detector 18 Extended relative to 1G-EPON data detector SP (Synchronization Pattern) replaces 0x55 sequence of 1G-EPON Delimiters are added: Start_of_Burst and End_of_Burst to facilitate burst delineation on OLT Rx side

Transmit path in 10G-EPON 19 [1] data with gaps at output of MPCP [2] MAC inserts IDLE characters into gaps [3] IDLE deletion removes extra idles, making space for FEC parity [4,5] Inside of Data Detector, frames are separated into blocks and parity is inserted; such stream is then passed to PMA and PMD

Receive path in 10G-EPON 20 [2] FEC decoder removes parity data blocks from incoming data stream, leaving gaps between frame fragments [3] IDLE Insertion inserts the correct number of IDLE characters (always in front of the frame) to close the gaps generated by FEC decoder and removal of parity

P802.3av interim, Shanghai, PRC 08 09.06.2009 IEEE P802.3av 10G-EPON MPCP specifications

MPCP general structure 22 MPCP for 10G-EPON included in Clause 77 Clause 77 versus Clause 64 (1G EPON MPCP) Extensions to several MPCPDUs (see next slides) Extensions to Discovery Process (see next slides) Changes to the MAC service interfaces (see next slides) Caused by P802.3as project Impacts the MPCP clause definitions Non-blocking character of the new MAC:MA_DATA.indication() primitive a source of serious concern for PON clauses - need to compensate for frame transmission time in state diagrams Minor changes due to stream based FEC overhead calculation at MPCP sublayer (see next slides) Initial Carrier Sense mechanism used in RS was abandoned FEC parity effect is now accounted for in MPCP when transmitting subsequent frames

Bit Flag field Values / Meaning 0 OLT is 1G upstream capable 1 OLT is 10G upstream capable GATE MPCPDU 2-3 Reserved Ignored on reception 4 5 OLT is opening 1G discovery window OLT is opening 10G discovery window 6-15 Reserved Ignored on reception 0 OLT does not support 1 Gb/s reception 1 OLT supports 1 Gb/s reception 0 OLT does not support 10 Gb/s reception 1 OLT supports 10 Gb/s reception 0 OLT cannot receive 1 Gb/s data in this window 1 OLT can receive 1 Gb/s data in this window 0 OLT cannot receive 10 Gb/s data in this window 1 OLT can receive 10 Gb/s data in this window 1 new flag field added to Discovery GATE (only): 2 bytes large, contains several flags and reserved fields Reason for changes: MPCP must be aware of ONU US and OLT DS data rates no way to get this information from MAC; Discovery Window for 1G and 10G can be opened at different times need to notify ONUs which window is opened at given time Reserved bits may be used for future extensions to higher data rates 23

REGISTER_REQ MPCPDU 24 3 new fields added to Register_Req: Discovery Information (2 bytes, with flags and reserved fields): ONU signals the OLT which Discovery Window it is using and what technical capabilities its Tx has (1G, 10G or both); bits reserved for future use will support new features / functions; Laser On Time (1 byte), Laser Off Time (1 byte): identify the minimum laser on/off times for the ONU; OLT can chose to use them or force the ONU to increase their values (for calculations only); Bit Flag field Values / Meaning 0 ONU is 1G upstream capable 1 ONU is 10G upstream capable 2-3 Reserved Ignored on reception 4 1G registration attempt 5 10G registration attempt 0 ONU transmitter is not capable of 1 Gb/s 1 ONU transmitter is capable of 1 Gb/s 0 ONU transmitter is not capable of 10 Gb/s 1 ONU transmitter is capable of 10 Gb/s 0 1 G registration is not attempted 1 1 G registration is attempted 0 10 G registration is not attempted 1 10 G registration is attempted 6-15 Reserved Ignored on reception

REGISTER MPCPDU & others 25 2 new fields added to Register: Echoed Laser On Time (1 byte), Echoed Laser Off Time (1 byte) identify the minimum laser on/off times for the ONU as transmitted by the OLT; OLT can chose to use the values provided by the ONU in the Register_Req or force the ONU to increase their values; ONU adopts the provided values for calculations of transmission overhead actual laser on/off times are limited by H/W; No other changes in the remaining MPCPDUs were made at this time Threshold reporting for REPORT MPCPDU is still undefined in P802.3av

Extensions to Discovery Process Changes in Discovery Process result from changes in MPCPDUs The same MPCPDUs are exchanged during the process: GATE, REGISTER_REQ, REGISTER, REGISTER_ACK MPCPDUs carry more information: GATE > information on OLT data rate and type of Discovery Window REGISTER_REQ > information on ONU data rate and which Discovery Window is used to register at the OLT + laser on/off time for ONU Tx REGISTER > echo of ONU Tx laser on/off times Additional processing for new data in MPCPDUs was included in state diagrams 26

Dual-rate Discovery Process [1] OLT must schedule both 1G & 10G Discovery Windows; 1G & 10G windows may be opened in a non-overlapping (one GATE) or overlapping (two GATEs). Table 77-10 in P802.3av describes recommended options. Potentially US dual rate ONUs can be also deployed (can switch between 1G and 10G upstream); Behaviour of such dual-rate ONUs must be predictable; OLT must know which Discovery Window such dual-rate ONUs respond to (1G or 10G) - recommendations are included in Table 77-11 in P802.3av. 27

Dual-rate Discovery Process [2] 28 Recommendations for behaviour of various types of ONUs during dual-rate Discovery Process Various settings for bits in Discovery Information flag field in Discovery GATE MPCPDU and LLID to be used in this GATE MPCPDU

Stream based FEC 29 Stream based FEC in 10G-EPON introduces constant transmission overhead, independent from the frame size; After each frame, FEC parity must be added: IDLE characters are inserted by MAC when no data is received from MAC Client, extra IDLEs are removed at PCS and replaced with FEC parity Extra space between frames is added in MAC Control sublayer : In effect of operation of Control Multiplexer After transmission of each frame, artificial gap is created with size necessary to guarantee enough space for FEC parity FEC_Overhead and CheckGrantSize functions account properly for FEC parity overhead Previously, FEC parity was accounted via CS in RS sublayer: Problematic approach and hard to control precisely Was abandonded after D2.0