Advantages of a Deposition

Similar documents
DEPOSITIONS. J. Alexander Tanford, 2001 I. PRELIMINARY MATTERS II. TAKING A DEPOSITION

KEEPING CONTROL AT DEPOSITION:

TRIAL TALK COLORADO TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION. October/November Years on the Side of People Volume 57 Issue 6

Making the Best Record for law students and lawyers

Breaks During Deposition Before Answering Pending Question (California)

SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRACTICE. LYNNE LIBERATO Haynes and Boone, LLP Houston, Texas

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Most of the expert witnesses I cross or depose these days are "insular. witnesses" - meaning that they testify at regulatory hearings (which are

Courtroom Evidence Presentation System

RevolutionaryText delivers a SaaS-oriented, patent-pending process developed by Reesa Parker, William Weber, and Harvey Schulman.

DIRECT EXAMINATION. Q. Go ahead and state and spell your name for the. A. Rick Chambers, R-I-C-K C-H-A-M-B-E-R-S.

Ronald N. Morris & Associates, Inc. Ronald N. Morris Certified Forensic Document Examiner

Annie, Get Your Gun, But Please Don t Bring It to the Depo

An Advocate s Craft: Honing Your Technology Skills for Modern Litigation

Q. But in reality, the bond had already been. revoked, hadn't it? It was already set at zero bond. before September 21st, specifically on September --

[3/24/2011] George Ross March 24, 2011

A Finding Aid to the Barbara Mathes Gallery Records Pertaining to Rio Nero Lawsuit, , in the Archives of American Art

[6/15/2011] Donald Trump June 15, 2011

P R O C E E D I N G S ; and the accompanying case on bond is Both sides ready to proceed? MS. TURNER: State's ready.

Q. That's all from the OC spray, right? MR. SCOTT: Okay. Pass the. THE COURT: State? MR. SCOTT: Yes, Your Honor. State, call your next.

Effective Use of Quotations By Angela Kershner, Legal Writing Fellow,

North Carolina Court of Appeals

SENTENCING ADVOCACY WORKSHOP. Storytelling at Sentencing. Tony Natale, Assistant Federal Public Defender, West Palm Beach, FL

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * v. * T-C * * * * * * * * * HEARING TRANSCRIPT * * * * * * * * *

NCRA Standards for Video Depositions

Case 1:12-cv GBL-TRJ Document Filed 11/21/12 Page 1 of 198 PageID# 2384

Cross Examination of the Criminalist. Felipe Plascencia

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO Office of the Chief Justice DIRECTIVE CONCERNING COURT APPOINTMENTS OF DECISION-MAKERS PURSUANT TO , C.R.S.

Courtroom Technology - An Introduction To The Onrushing Future

An Introduction to PHP. Slide 1 of :31:37 PM]

1 MR. ROBERT LOPER: I have nothing. 3 THE COURT: Thank you. You're. 5 MS. BARNETT: May we approach? 7 (At the bench, off the record.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Articles in the Source should aim to be under 5000 words (about 16 pages double-spaced) with or fewer footnotes, or only as needed.

Compare and contrast essay words >>>CLICK HERE<<<

Your One Source for Court Reporting, Videography and Trial Support Services

CELL TOWER VICTORIES by Michael Cherry, Edward J. Imwinkelried, Manfred Schenk, Aaron Romano, Naomi Fetterman, Nicole Hardin and Arnie Beckman.

Do's, Don'ts, and Maybes: Usage Controversies Part II

~ ~ (208)

How to Write a Paper for a Forensic Damages Journal

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. Recitals

2 DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL ) BEFORE THE INDEPENDENT DISTRICT, ) 3 Petitioner ) HEARING EXAMINER ) 4 VS. ) FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, ) 5 ARDIS McCANN )

Andy Payne Howie & Sweeney L.L.P Turtle Creek Blvd. 14 th Floor Dallas, TX /

REPORTER'S RECORD TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO DCV-0235-B

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE Defendant. /

ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY

Court Filings 2000 Trial

Legality of Electronically Stored Images

Conditional Probability and Bayes

Officer Damon Morton - April 15, 2014 Direct Examination by Ms. Vohra OFFICER DAMON MORTON, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Courtroom Survey Checklist

IT S SHOWTIME! Using Technology to Add Organization and Pizzaz To Trial Presentations by Ronald C. Morton Morton Law Firm, PLLC Clinton, Mississippi

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************

Atticus Finch, Perry Mason and Michael Clayton Have Nothing on the Legal Profession s Favorite Attorney: Vinny

22 JOHNNY JACKSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 606 Virginia Street, East 23 Charleston, WV (304) APPEARANCES. 2 On behalf of Plaintiffs:

KENT COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD. June 16, 2016

THE COURT: May she be excused? MS. COREY: Yes, sir. MR. STROLLA: Yes, sir. (Witness excused.) THE COURT: Next witness, Mr. Strolla.

Guidelines for Reviewers

WINNING YOUR CASE THROUGH EFFECTIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1

Testimony of David Rogers

Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine NOTES FOR CONTRIBUTORS

QUESTIONNAIRE. For Applicants for Errors and Omissions Insurance COMPANY NAME, IF ANY: State of incorporation or formation: NAME OF PRODUCTION:

A Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Satellite Broadcast and Webcast

BY KIRSTEN K. DAVIS & TAMARA HERRERA

Drug giant Merck loses negligence case

COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT: GET A HIT, GET A WRIT PRESENTED TO THE SXSW CONFERENCE CLE PROGRAM MARCH 17, 2017

Michigan Video Courtroom Users Group. Video Record System Implementation Manual

In the Supreme Court of the United States

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Legal Analysis: The Fundamental Skill PDF

UNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 0900, MJ [Col SPATH]: This commission is called to order.

is a true story of a person s life written by another person. Good biographers research subjects

THE CASE OF MY FAVORITE BOOK

Reporter's Transcript of Proceedings TESTIMONY OF CARL MARINO Wednesday, December 13,

United States Court of Appeals

Fact vs. Fiction: Writing the Facts Part I

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 3 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE CIVIL ACTION NO PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO 4 ANIMALS,

Registered Professional Reporter

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 18 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE THANG NGUYEN BARRETT, JUDGE

Connection of Concepts. texts from Anzaldua s How to Tame a Wild Tongue to Russel and Yanez s Big picture

A. When I collect fingernail swabs, I put them in. And then after they dry, I put them into a. I seal those boxes, I put them into an envelope

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK i COUNTY OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, EXAMINATION BEFORE TRIAL of PETER J. BALZANO, the

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

I, Kent Gibson, state the following, of which I have personal. knowledge: I am the founder of Forensic Audio (ForensicAudio.

Government Unit 3 Performance Task Analysis and Argumentative Writing: Foreign Affairs Paragraph

Presenting the Final report

APE 9/2/16 Do I understand how to organize a paragraph?

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Plaintiff, Defendants. / Proceedings held on Wednesday, July 18, 2018,

Golan v. Holder. Supreme Court of the United States 2012

Case 1:15-cv LJA Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Case 1:10-cv LFG-RLP Document 1 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

J. Scott Colesanti SSRN Author #

TESTIMONY OF LEN SAVAGE TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

English as a Second Language Podcast ENGLISH CAFÉ 131

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dr. Keats - Defendant - Direct. plaintiff. And now we will hear from a witness

Judicial Writing Manual: A Pocket Guide for Judges

v. 15 Cr. 536 (PGG) Trial New York, N.Y. December 7, :35 a.m. HON. PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge -and a jury- APPEARANCES

Transcription:

Advantages of a Deposition You can ask specific follow up questions based on the answers you get You give the deponent less time to frame an answer, thus often making it less misleading You can ask a deponent to bring certain documents to the deposition, eliminating the need for a separate request for documents You can gauge the facial expressions, demeanor, etc., of the deponent more easily It can last as long as you need to get your information Subject to a 7 hour cap under the federal rules It applies to non party witnesses and to parties Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9 Slide 1

Deposition Preliminary Considerations First, you need to determine whom to depose. These can include: The opponent, in most cases Key witnesses Corporate officers with defendant or plaintiff corporations who might have relevant knowledge Experts for the opponent Depositions can be expensive, so you ll sometimes need to choose whom to depose if you have a list Conduct a preliminary interview with the deponent (by phone is fine) if possible, as everything in the deposition goes on the record. Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9 Slide 2

Procedure for Setting up a Deposition First, you need to plan the deposition, including: Time and date and site where it will be help If the parties agree or the court orders, it can be done by phone, web conferencing, etc. How it will be recorded Hiring a stenographer to take down the record Someone needs to administer an oath to the deponent Next, you need to draft notices of the deposition, which should contain the time and place of the deposition, who is being deposed. If the person is a nonparty and you re worried about the person not coming, you can get a subpoena issued by the court to command the deponent to come. When getting a subpoena for medical information, HIPAA gives certain protections to the confidentiality of the information Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9 Slide 3

Serving the Notice/ Subpoena The notice of deposition must be served on: The party to be deposed All other parties to the case The subpoena or notice can be sent by mail Certified mail is best, to prove receipt It s s often a good idea with a non party witness, to call the witness to give him/her a heads up that the subpoena is coming. People tend to panic or get distressed when they get unexpected court orders Attach whatever fees are necessary For subpoenas, the law often requires you to compensate for travel expenses, etc. Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9 Slide 4

Preparing for the Deposition 1 Draft the Actual Questions of at least an examination outline If you re more comfortable and experienced with depositions, then a outline may be better than actual questions, as it makes it easier to think up new questions or change tactics on the fly. Ask basic and background information first. Even if you have basic information, it doesn t t hurt to ask it to make sure Be as complete as possible in your questions. Ask about everything. Remember, inadmissible evidence like hearsay and character evidence can still be asked about in a deposition Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9 Slide 5

Preparing for the Deposition 2 Gather and prepare all of your exhibits and documents that you want to show the witness E.g., for reference, to authenticate, etc. Set up a file for each witness, including all relevant reference to that witness If the witness is friendly or your client, prepare the witness before the deposition, almost like you would before testifying at trial It s s unethical and illegal, of course, to tell a witness to lie or withhold the truth; but you can counsel a witness how to explain certain things or to not answer right away if a question calls for privileged information, etc. Non attorneys can, and often do, attend depositions to help decide if the witness will be effective, etc. Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9 Slide 6

Process of the Deposition Itself All lawyers for all parties have their turns to ask questions of the deponent The deponent or another lawyer may object to any question E.g., work product, privilege, etc. The deponent does not answer if there is an objection Any objections that can t t be ironed out by the parties can be settled by the judge later on After the deposition, the deponent reviews the transcript and signs if he agrees Depositions cannot be used at trial except: To impeach the deponent If the deponent is unavailable A few other limited exceptions Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9 Slide 7

Digesting Depositions This is the process of distilling the irrelevant parts and producing a shorter document with the key information given by the deponent. Purposes: Make it easier to read for anyone reviewing it Make it easier to cross reference reference with another document by using headings Identify information for follow up, etc All other members of the firm to be brought up to speed on the case quickly Allow the client to quickly be informed of what happened at the deposition that was significant Make it easy to find relevant testimony for a memo Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9 Slide 8

Digesting Depositions Techniques Make sure you understand the relevant elements and defenses that must be shown at trial Use the outline or question sheet that was used ad deposition Skim the whole deposition to get a feel for which issues were covered when, etc. Draft an outline by topic Use the topic to put in key answers related to that topic Be as concise as possible, but also make sure to use the witness words. Don t t paraphrase if there s s any chance of changing the meaning of the words Use subheadings and use short paragraphs If you want to make an even more concise version with paraphrasing, first save a digest version with original quotes intact i Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9 Slide 9