Mesotrione: Program for Bentgrass Removal and Overseeding (Fall Timing)

Similar documents
Final Report. Selective Control of Persistent Perennial Ryegrass from Bermudagrass Turf

Let s randomize your treatment (draw plot #s)

Paired plot designs experience and recommendations for in field product evaluation at Syngenta

Sampling Worksheet: Rolling Down the River

Ryegrass. Mississippi VARIETY TRIALS, Information Bulletin 430 November Mississippi Agricultural & Forestry Experiment Station

TITLE OF PROJECT: 2004 Processing Pea Cultivar Evaluation

Public International Tender No. 3/16

Forage Test Results. Wheat Forage. Tifton, Georgia: Wheat Forage Performance,

Ryegrass. Tifton, Georgia: Ryegrass Forage Performance, Dry Matter Yield

Oat Forage. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Forage Performance, Dry Matter Yield

Do delay tactics affect silking date and yield of maize inbreds? Stephen Zimmerman Creative Component November 2015

Series 7600 Centrifugal Airfoil Fan

RANDOMIZED COMPLETE BLOCK DESIGN (RCBD) Probably the most used and useful of the experimental designs.

FLIP Procedure. From the main work screen, select Menu. Then select Start Job. Press New Job.

Prospects for managing Sclerotinia head rot with fungicides LESSONS FROM FIELD TRIALS CONDUCTED IN 2011

*OMPFP12264* OPERATOR'S MANUAL OMPFP12264 ISSUE F2 (ENGLISH) CALIFORNIA Proposition 65 Warning

PROC GLM AND PROC MIXED CODES FOR TREND ANALYSES FOR ROW-COLUMN DESIGNED EXPERIMENTS

Lg Lcd Tv Guide READ ONLINE

Management practices that help to reduce nutrient leaching

Fraction by Sinevibes audio slicing workstation

subplots (30-m by 33-m) without space between potential subplots. Depending on the size of the

Service Call: Fiber Optic Installation and Repair

Moving on from MSTAT. March The University of Reading Statistical Services Centre Biometrics Advisory and Support Service to DFID

If your sight is worse than perfect then you well need to be even closer than the distances below.

Check out the Great New JD Products

Diamondback Moth Resistance to Synthetic Pyrethroids: How to Overcome the Problem with Del tamethrin

COTTON. Mississippi VARIETY TRIALS, Information Bulletin 441 February 2008

Delaware Division of Libraries Update A presentation at the joint Delaware Library Association/ Maryland Library Association Annual Conference 2013

Series 8800 Radial Tip Fans Design 8812

RCBD with Sampling Pooling Experimental and Sampling Error

In Depth Look: Managing Diamondback Moth in the Face of Insecticide Resistance

vset Select System Operation

How To: Replace the stock Antenna with a CB Antenna A CFans Members Mod Project by coyote

1'-tq/? BU-- _-M August 2000 Technical Report Series of the Department of Biometrics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Series: BPV, BPLHS. Vertical Multi-Stage Family Curve, 3500 RPM - 60Hz. Family Curves. Vertical Multi-Stage Pumps.

Overall vibration, severity levels and crest factor plus 3 CF+ White Paper

2018 Mississippi Cotton Official Small Plot Variety Trials

Comparison of Mixed-Effects Model, Pattern-Mixture Model, and Selection Model in Estimating Treatment Effect Using PRO Data in Clinical Trials

Best Pat-Tricks on Model Diagnostics What are they? Why use them? What good do they do?

Lecture 5: Frequency Musicians describe sustained, musical tones in terms of three quantities:

AP Statistics Sec 5.1: An Exercise in Sampling: The Corn Field

Integrated Precision Harvesting System: A Promising Technology to Improve Berry Yield and Quality. Precision Agriculture Research Team

Charlottesville / Central Virginia Region Q NestRealty.com 1 of 9

Statistical Consulting Topics. RCBD with a covariate

Library. Summary Report

Series: BPV, BPLHS Family Curves

Block Block Block

Series 7400 Vaneaxial Fans Designs 7410, 7412, 7413 & 7416

The RTDNA/Hofstra University Annual Survey found that 2009 meant another year of TV

Twin City Fan & Blower

955608_01 4/4/18. SeedSense Operator s Guide For Gen2 20/20 Displays

Advanced Seed Monitoring

Facedown Terminations Improve Ripple Current Capability

PogoStick and Research Pogo App Operator s Guide

THE ADYOULIKE STATE OF NATIVE VIDEO REPORT EXCLUSIVE RESEARCH REPORT

Problem Points Score USE YOUR TIME WISELY USE CLOSEST DF AVAILABLE IN TABLE SHOW YOUR WORK TO RECEIVE PARTIAL CREDIT

2016 Mississippi Cotton Official Small Plot Variety Trials

ELEMENTS I CUSTOM ARCHITECTURAL CERAMICS. Double-Loaded Porcelain.

Overall vibration, severity levels and crest factor plus

COTTON. Bainbridge, Georgia: Earier Maturity Cotton Variety Performance, 2016, Irrigated

Beautiful radiators for modern living

Employment Cost Index Original Data Value Series Id: Seasonally adjusted Series Title: Ownership: Component: Occupation: Industry: Subcategory:

Alternative: purchase a laptop 3) The design of the case does not allow for maximum airflow. Alternative: purchase a cooling pad

Home Page 1 Press the House button I E

Bassoon Fingering Issues By Michael Burns

Sector sampling. Nick Smith, Kim Iles and Kurt Raynor

DA IN 1-OUT LINE DRIVER WITH EQUALIZATION + AUDIO USER S GUIDE

Fiberglass - Technical Data

PaPiRus Assembly Tips And Gotchas

AP Statistics Sampling. Sampling Exercise (adapted from a document from the NCSSM Leadership Institute, July 2000).

TR6102HD HDTV/DVD/COMPONENT VIDEO TO RGBHV TRANSCODER USER S GUIDE

Print versus Electronic Journal Use in Three Sci/Tech Disciplines: The Cultural Shi in Process

RELIABILITY REASON FOR A COMMERCIAL INADVERTENT-INTERCHANGE SETTLEMENT STANDARD.

New Products. New Possibilities.

On Your Own. Applications. Unit 2. ii. The following are the pairs of mutual friends: A-C, A-E, B-D, C-D, and D-E.

* This configuration has been updated to a 64K memory with a 32K-32K logical core split.

White Paper JBL s LSR Principle, RMC (Room Mode Correction) and the Monitoring Environment by John Eargle. Introduction and Background:

Standard Method of Test for Random Method of Sampling Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) SCDOT Designation: SC-T-101 (08/13)

colors AN INTRODUCTION TO USING COLORS FOR UNITY v1.1

MAG LED TETRIS LINEAR. LEDs for everyone...

Chapter 7: RV's & Probability Distributions

The Zendesk Benchmark. The ROI case for omnichannel support

Model II ANOVA: Variance Components

Source: BARC India, BMW data; Period: Wk08-Wk48, 2017, TG: Universe, Mkt: All India, Channels considered: All News Channels

Temperature Management Plan and Credit Trading Activities Annual Report

The Siebold Company, Inc TSC Graphic Arts Division

USER MANUAL FOR DDT 2D. Introduction. Installation. Getting Started. Danley Design Tool 2d. Welcome to the Danley Design Tool 2D program.

HARDCOVER BINDING SEMINAR SEPTEMBER 29, Jack Bendror President Mekatronics, Inc.

Customized Solutions The key to your success Continental Solid Tires

Dennis R. Buckmaster Purdue University Agricultural & Biological Engineering

RowFlow Operators Manual

07:00 09OCT OCT2009 TIME: 8 Hours /div. Plot Comments

If you are using a CRT tester/restorer other than the CR7000 you are likely incorrectly testing today s CRTs and risk damaging every one you restore.

Revisiting Dynamic Lap Shear Method for Evaluating Tapes Marc I. Johnson, Texture Technologies Corp.

Stud Welding Equipment

FARM ADVISOR AND SPECIALIST VARIETY TRIALS IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

TI-Inspire manual 1. Real old version. This version works well but is not as convenient entering letter

for the Epson Stylus Pro 4000 User s Guide

FRAMES PER MULTIFRAME SLOTS PER TDD - FRAME

NETFLIX MOVIE RATING ANALYSIS

Transcription:

Mesotrione: Program for Bentgrass Removal and Overseeding (Fall Timing) (Protocol #: HMS805B4-2007US) Final Report Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, Matthew W. Williams, and Christopher A. Proctor Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University Feb. 7, 2008 A field study was conducted at the Washington State University Turfgrass and Agronomy Research Center (TARC), in Pullman, WA, during late summer and early fall of 2007 to develop an effective program to remove creeping bentgrass (cv. T-1 ) from a cool-season turfgrass ( Gallery perennial ryegrass) with mesotrione 4SC ( Tenacity ). The turf stand was actually a greens surround of a T-1 research green. Several different programs were tried (Table 1). Spray applications of Tenacity were made with a bicycle-wheeled CO 2 pressurized sprayer with 11002 flat fan spray tips at 25 GPA. A buffer of approximately 2 feet was maintained from the putting surface to the treated area. Plots were overseeded at 10 lbs/m with Auburn Trilogy, a 3-way perennial ryegrass (33% SR4600, 33% Mach 1, and 32% Firebolt ) mixture from United Agri Products (UAP). The following steps were taken to overseed treatments 1, 2, 3, and 6 at 2 WAT (8 Aug) and treatment 4 at 4 WAT (22 Aug): 1) Mowed at 0.290 w/ Greens King IV triplex mower. 2) Verticut in 2 directions w/ Greens King IV. 3) Removed residue w/ Goosen turf vacuum. 4) Core aerified w/ Ryan Greensaire II using 1/2 hollow tines. 5) Removed cores w/ Goosen Turf vacuum. 6) A single pass was made over each of the overseed plots with a 6 -wide tractor-mounted Land Pride slicer seeder. This was used to verticut only. No seed was applied through the slicer seeder. - On uneven ground in Reps 2 and 3 a small dethatcher was used to simulate the slice operation of the Land Pride. 7) To overseed, a Scott s SS-2 drop spreader was used to apply Auburn Trilogy at 10 lbs/1000 ft 2. 8) Heavy topdress w/turfco topdresser setting 1.5. 9) Drug in sand with drag brush (Hand broomed in heavy sand areas to evenly distribute sand). 10) Rolled w/ water ballast roller. 11) Applied 2 nd Tenacity treatment.

12) Site irrigated 16 hours after applying Tenacity. Percent bentgrass cover was taken every week beginning at 2 WAT (8 Aug). Percent perennial ryegrass cover was taken every week beginning at 2 WAT (8 Aug). Perennial ryegrass phytotoxicity was rated using a scale of 0-10, with 10 = dead turf and values above 2 as unacceptable injury. The experiment was a randomized-complete block design with four replications and individual treatment plots were 6 x 16. Bentgrass cover at any rating date, up to 8 WAT, showed virtually no difference among any of the Tenacity treatments (Table 1 and Figure 1). However, looking at the trends over time, percent bentgrass cover for treatments 1, 2, or 3 sharply declined following the 2 nd Tenacity application at 2 WAT (8 Aug) and up to 5 WAT (29 Aug) (Figure 1). Surprisingly, following the 3 rd Tenacity application 5 WAT (29 Aug) for treatments 1 or 2, bentgrass cover did not show any further decline. Treatment 3 showed a small decline in bentgrass cover following the 4 th application 8 WAT (12 Sept). Although treatment 4 sharply declined to 0% bentgrass cover by 6 WAT (5 Sept) it was not significantly different, for the most part, than treatments 1, 2, or 3. Interestingly, treatment 4 went to 0% bentgrass cover 1 week before the 4 th application (12 Sept) of Tenacity was made. Perennial ryegrass cover showed no differences among any of the Tenacity treatments at any of the rating dates, except at 4 WAT because of the offset in the 4 week overseeding of treatment 4 (Table 2 and Figure 2). The trend over time showed that percent ryegrass cover increased sharply from 3 to 5 WAT for treatments 1, 2, or 3 and from 4 to 6 WAT following the 4 WAT overseeding for treatment 4. There was only a slight increase in perennial ryegrass cover after that up through 8 WAT. Even though treatment 4 showed no bentgrass cover present by 6 WAT it was not completely filled in either. Treatments 1, 2, 3, or 4 had anywhere from 10 to 20% exposed ground (no cover) from 6 to 8 WAT. It may, in this case, be advisable to do a second overseeding in order to develop a more complete turfgrass stand more quickly. An additional overseeding at 5 to 6 WAT may be advisable. A spike in phytotoxicity was observed at 5 WAT, which was one week after the 4 week overseed and 3 rd Tenacity application for treatment 4 (Table 3 and Figure 3). This spike may have been due to the aggressive overseeding procedure coupled with the Tenacity treatment that followed. However, no phytotoxicity was noted following any of the 2 week overseed and Tenacity treatments. A slight amount of phytotoxicity was noticed at 6 WAT (5 Sept) 1 week following the 3 rd Tenacity application for treatments 1, 2, or 3. No phytotoxicity was observed 1 week following the 4 th Tenacity application on 12 Sept for treatments 3 or 4.

Overall, statistically all of the Tenacity/overseeding programs worked equally well, however, complete bentgrass removal was achieved when the plots were overseeded at 4 weeks following the initial Tenacity application (treatment 4). An additional overseeding at 5 to 6 WAT would be advisable to facilitate a faster more complete cover of the turf. For the most part, the maximum bentgrass cover reduction occurred 1 week prior to the last Tenacity application for each of the programs. Whether one can say that the last treatment is necessary or not it is hard to conclude from this study. As discussed earlier, each of the treatments will be split in half this year (2008) in which one half will be treated with Tenacity and the other half will not. We need to devise a protocol for this study such as: number of Tenacity applications, rate, and when to apply these treatments. Table 1. Percent bentgrass cover following multiple applications of Tenacity and overseeded with Auburn Trilogy, a 3-way perennial ryegrass mixture. Tenacity Bentgrass cover (%) Rate NIS Dates Overseed 8/8/07 8/15/07 8/22/07 8/29/07 9/5/07 9/12/07 9/19/07 Trt# Treatment (g ai/ha) (% V/V) applied date 2 WAT 3 WAT 4 WAT 5 WAT 6 WAT 7 WAT 8 WAT 1 Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 25-Jul 75.0 61.3 26.3 b* 16.3 b 13.8 b 15.0 bc 13.8 b 2 Tenacity + NIS 175 0.25% 25-Jul 63.8 51.3 21.3 b 12.5 b 10.0 b 11.3 bc 6.3 b Tenacity + NIS 175 0.25% 8-Aug 8-Aug Tenacity + NIS 175 0.25% 29-Aug 3 Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 25-Jul 61.3 52.5 20.0 b 11.3 b 17.5 b 18.8 b 13.8 b 4 Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 25-Jul 57.5 48.8 30.0 b 15.0 b 0.0 b 0.0 c 0.0 b Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 8-Aug Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 22-Aug 22-Aug 5 Check 0 0 65.0 65.0 68.8 a 71.3 a 71.3 a 71.3 a 71.3 a 6 Overseed Check 0 0 8-Aug 67.5 68.8 66.3 a 63.8 a 62.5 a 62.5 a 62.5 a * Values within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different LSD P =0.05.

Figure 1. Percent bentgrass cover following multiple applications of Tenacity and overseeded with Auburn Trilogy, a 3-way perennial ryegrass mixture. 100 80 2 WAT overseed (OS) Bentgrass Cover (%) 60 40 20 4 WAT overseed (OS) Trt 1 (3x 140 g ai/ha 2 wk OS) Trt 2 (3x 175 g ai/ha 2 wk OS) Trt 3 (4x 140 g ai/ha 2 wk OS) Trt 4 (4x 140 g ai/ha 4 wk OS) Trt 5 (CHECK) Trt 6 (CHECK 2 wk OS) 0 8/8 8/15 8/22 8/29 Date (2007) 9/5 9/12 9/19

Table 2. Percent turfgrass cover following multiple applications of Tenacity and overseeded with Auburn Trilogy, a 3-way perennial ryegrass mixture. Rate NIS App. Overseed 8/8/07 8/15/07 8/22/07 8/29/07 9/5/07 9/12/07 9/19/07 Trt# Treatment (g ai/ha) (% V/V) date date 2 WAT 3 WAT 4 WAT 5 WAT 6 WAT 7 WAT 8 WAT 1 Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 25-Jul 21.3 30.0 61.3 ab* 71.3 a 73.8 a 75.0 a 77.5 a 2 Tenacity + NIS 175 0.25% 25-Jul 33.8 40.0 67.5 ab 76.3 a 78.8 a 80.0 a 84.3 a Tenacity + NIS 175 0.25% 8-Aug 8-Aug Tenacity + NIS 175 0.25% 29-Aug 3 Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 25-Jul 35.0 40.0 71.3 a 78.8 a 71.3 a 72.5 a 78.0 a 4 Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 25-Jul 43.8 46.3 46.3 bc 66.3 a 80.0 a 81.3 a 86.0 a Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 8-Aug Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 22-Aug 22-Aug 5 Check 0 0 35.0 35.0 31.3 c 31.3 b 28.8 b 28.8 b 28.8 b 6 Overseed Check 0 0 8-Aug 32.5 31.3 33.8 c 36.3 b 37.5 b 37.5 b 37.5 b * Values within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different LSD P =0.05. Perennial ryegrass cover (%)

Figure 2. Percent perennial ryegrass cover following multiple applications of Tenacity and overseeded with Auburn Trilogy, a 3-way perennial ryegrass mixture. Perennial ryegrass cover (%) 100 80 60 40 20 Trt 1 (3x 140 g ai/ha 2 wk OS) Trt 2 (3x 175 g ai/ha 2 wk OS) Trt 3 (4x 140 g ai/ha 2 wk OS) Trt 4 (4x 140 g ai/ha 4 wk OS) Trt 5 (CHECK) Trt 6 (CHECK 2 wk OS) 2 WAT overseed (OS) 4 WAT overseed (OS) 0 8/8 8/15 8/22 8/29 Date (2007) 9/5 9/12 9/19

Table 3. Perennial ryegrass phytotoxicity following multiple applications of Tenacity and overseeded with Auburn Trilogy, a 3- way perennial ryegrass mixture. Rate NIS App. Overseed 8/8/07 8/15/07 8/22/07 8/29/07 9/5/07 9/12/07 9/19/07 Trt# Treatment (g ai/ha) (% V/V) date date 2 WAT 3 WAT 4 WAT 5 WAT 6 WAT 7 WAT 8 WAT 1 Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 25-Jul 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 b** 0.8 ab 0.0 0.0 2 Tenacity + NIS 175 0.25% 25-Jul 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b 0.8 ab 0.0 0.0 Tenacity + NIS 175 0.25% 8-Aug 8-Aug Tenacity + NIS 175 0.25% 29-Aug 3 Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 25-Jul 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b 1.0 a 0.0 0.0 4 Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 25-Jul 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 a 0.5 ab 0.0 0.0 Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 8-Aug Tenacity + NIS 140 0.25% 22-Aug 22-Aug 5 Check 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.0 0.0 6 Overseed Check 0 0 8-Aug 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.0 0.0 * Perennial ryegrass phytotoxicity rated 0-10, with 10 = dead turf. ** Values within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different LSD P =0.05. Perennial ryegrass phytotoxicity*

Figure 3. Perennial ryegrass phytotoxicity following multiple applications of Tenacity and overseeded with Auburn Trilogy, a 3-way perennial ryegrass mixture. 10 Perennial ryegrass phytotoxicity (0-10) 8 6 4 2 Trt 1 (3x 140 g ai/ha 2 wk OS) Trt 2 (3x 175 g ai/ha 2 wk OS) Trt 3 (4x 140 g ai/ha 2 wk OS) Trt 4 (4x 140 g ai/ha 4 wk OS) Trt 5 (CHECK) Trt 6 (CHECK 2 wk OS) 0 2 WAT 3 WAT 4 WAT 5 WAT 6 WAT 7 WAT 8 WAT 8/8/07 8/15/07 8/22/07 8/29/07 9/5/07 9/12/07 9/19/07