Extension of OFDMA Physical layer mode to support 256 & 1024 point QAM constellations for high capacity back-haul applications

Similar documents
IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < On Concatenation of Block Turbo Codes for OFDMA

IEEE C802.16e-05/095r3. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

FullMAX Air Inetrface Parameters for Upper 700 MHz A Block v1.0

IEEE C802.16d-04/50r2

Commsonic. ISDB-S3 Modulator CMS0070. Contact information

Specifications for 2.3GHz band Portable Internet Service - Physical Layer -

There is little wonder

II. SYSTEM MODEL In a single cell, an access point and multiple wireless terminals are located. We only consider the downlink

Link Budget Analysis for Broadband Services in IEEE b

DVB-T2 modulator design supporting multiple PLP and auxiliary streams

Commsonic. Satellite FEC Decoder CMS0077. Contact information

Commsonic. DVB-Satellite Modulator CMS0035. Contact information

Next-Generation Digital Television Terrestrial Broadcasting Systems

IEEE P a. IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Networks. hybrid modulation schemes and cameras ISC modes

Commsonic. DVB-S2 Modulator CMS0025. Contact information

Commsonic. Multi-channel ATSC 8-VSB Modulator CMS0038. Contact information. Compliant with ATSC A/53 8-VSB

PERFORMANCE AND MODELING OF LTE H-ARQ. Josep Colom Ikuno, Martin Wrulich, Markus Rupp

LTE-A Base Station Performance Tests According to TS Rel. 12 Application Note

[Dharani*, 4.(8): August, 2015] ISSN: (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785

Adaptive Sub-band Nulling for OFDM-Based Wireless Communication Systems

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

HYBRID CONCATENATED CONVOLUTIONAL CODES FOR DEEP SPACE MISSION

Latest Trends in Worldwide Digital Terrestrial Broadcasting and Application to the Next Generation Broadcast Television Physical Layer

White Paper Versatile Digital QAM Modulator

REPORT/GATE FORMAT. Ed Boyd, Xingtera Supporters: Duane Remein, Huawei

ENGINEERING COMMITTEE Digital Video Subcommittee AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD ANSI/SCTE Digital Transmission Standard For Cable Television

Flexible Multi-Bit Feedback Design for HARQ Operation of Large-Size Data Packets in 5G Khosravirad, Saeed; Mudolo, Luke; Pedersen, Klaus I.

Commsonic. (Tail-biting) Viterbi Decoder CMS0008. Contact information. Advanced Tail-Biting Architecture yields high coding gain and low delay.

Video Transmission. Thomas Wiegand: Digital Image Communication Video Transmission 1. Transmission of Hybrid Coded Video. Channel Encoder.

Two-Level Fronthual Architecture and Requirements. Liuyan Han and Jinri Huang China Mobile

Satellite Digital Broadcasting Systems

GPRS Measurements in TEMS Products. Technical Paper

Performance Evaluation of DVB-T2 Time Interleaving in Mobile Environments

Two-Level Fronthual Architecture and Requirements. Liuyan Han and Jinri Huang China Mobile

A LOW COST TRANSPORT STREAM (TS) GENERATOR USED IN DIGITAL VIDEO BROADCASTING EQUIPMENT MEASUREMENTS

Fig 1. Flow Chart for the Encoder

The Discussion of this exercise covers the following points:

Higher-Order Modulation and Turbo Coding Options for the CDM-600 Satellite Modem

Module 8 VIDEO CODING STANDARDS. Version 2 ECE IIT, Kharagpur

Digital Video Broadcasting and IPTV as alternatives to the OTT media services

SERIES J: CABLE NETWORKS AND TRANSMISSION OF TELEVISION, SOUND PROGRAMME AND OTHER MULTIMEDIA SIGNALS Digital transmission of television signals

ETSI TS V1.1.1 ( ) Technical Specification

ETSI TS V1.1.1 ( )

MODEL-BASED DESIGN OF LTE BASEBAND PROCESSOR USING XILINX SYSTEM GENERATOR IN FPGA

Exercise 4. Data Scrambling and Descrambling EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE DISCUSSION. The purpose of data scrambling and descrambling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Proposed Standard Revision of ATSC Digital Television Standard Part 5 AC-3 Audio System Characteristics (A/53, Part 5:2007)

PRACTICAL PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS OF LTE BROADCAST (EMBMS) FOR TV APPLICATIONS

Advanced Coding and Modulation Schemes for Broadband Satellite Services. Commercial Requirements

SVP. HDR Diversity Receiver. DVB-T2/T & ISDB-T Diversity 2/4/8 Receiver. Broadcast microwave FEATURES OPTIONS APPLICATIONS

Motion Video Compression

Error Performance Analysis of a Concatenated Coding Scheme with 64/256-QAM Trellis Coded Modulation for the North American Cable Modem Standard

WaveDevice Hardware Modules

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March-2015 ISSN DESIGN OF MB-OFDM SYSTEM USING HDL

DOCSIS 2.0 A-TDMA Modulation Profiles

Transmission System for ISDB-S

Critical C-RAN Technologies Speaker: Lin Wang

Improving Frame FEC Efficiency. Improving Frame FEC Efficiency. Using Frame Bursts. Lior Khermosh, Passave. Ariel Maislos, Passave

ENGINEERING COMMITTEE Interface Practices Subcommittee AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD ANSI/SCTE

UTILIZATION OF MATLAB FOR THE DIGITAL SIGNAL TRANSMISSION SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS IN DTV AND DVB AREA. Tomáš Kratochvíl

IEEE C a-02/26r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

The Internet of Things in a Cellular World

Agenda. ATSC Overview of ATSC 3.0 Status

DVB-S2 and DVB-RCS for VSAT and Direct Satellite TV Broadcasting

Physical Layer Signaling for the Next Generation Mobile TV Standard DVB-NGH

TV4U QUAD DVB-S2 to DVB-C TRANSMODULATOR

A Novel Turbo Codec Encoding and Decoding Mechanism

B Joon Tae Kim Jong Gyu Oh Yong Ju Won Jin Sub Seop Lee

Technology Advances. Ashaad Rambharos CSE Intelsat Africa

Development of Media Transport Protocol for 8K Super Hi Vision Satellite Broadcasting System Using MMT

PAPER Wireless Multi-view Video Streaming with Subcarrier Allocation

ATSC Digital Television Standard: Part 6 Enhanced AC-3 Audio System Characteristics

Knovative Where Knowledge Drives Innovation

SIC receiver in a mobile MIMO-OFDM system with optimization for HARQ operation

OFDM-Based Turbo-Coded Hierarchical and Non-Hierarchical Terrestrial Mobile Digital Video Broadcasting

/10/$ IEEE ICME /10/$ IEEE 504

An Implementation of a Forward Error Correction Technique using Convolution Encoding with Viterbi Decoding

VENTUS 1.0 All in One USB Type of DTV / Mobile TV Signal Generator

White Paper ATSC 3.0 Overview

Implications and Optimization of Coverage and Payload for ATSC 3.0

Local Television Capacity Assessment

ATSC Proposed Standard: A/341 Amendment SL-HDR1

Submission Title: Requirements on Wireless Backhauling and Fronthauling

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BT.1203 *

White Paper Lower Costs in Broadcasting Applications With Integration Using FPGAs

Optimum Frame Synchronization for Preamble-less Packet Transmission of Turbo Codes

LTE RF Measurements with the R&S CMW500 according to 3GPP TS Application Note. Products: R&S CMW500

R&S SFD DOCSIS Signal Generator Signal generator for DOCSIS 3.1 downstream and upstream

Time and Frequency Division Multiplexing Configuration

THE SPECTRAL EFFICIENCY OF DOCSIS 3.1 SYSTEMS AYHAM AL- BANNA, DISTINGUISHED SYSTEM ENGINEER TOM CLOONAN, CTO, NETWORK SOLUTIONS

Increasing Capacity of Cellular WiMAX Networks by Interference Coordination

Multi-Layer Video Broadcasting with Low Channel Switching Dl Delays

TERRESTRIAL broadcasting of digital television (DTV)

NI Measurement Suite for Mobile WiMAX Specifications

Robust Transmission of H.264/AVC Video using 64-QAM and unequal error protection

Performance Improvement of AMBE 3600 bps Vocoder with Improved FEC

Transcription:

Project Title IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <http://ieee802.org/16> Extension of OFDMA Physical layer mode to support 256 & 1024 point QAM constellations for high capacity back-haul applications Date Submitted Source(s) Re: 2013-03-19 David Castelow, Andrew Logothetis and Marlon Persaud Airspan Communications Ltd Capital Point, 33 Bath Road Slough, SL1 3UF, UK IEEE 802.16-13-0032-01-Gdoc Voice: +44 1895 467281 E-mail: dcastelow at airspan.com *<http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliationfaq.html> Abstract Purpose Notice Copyright Policy Patent Policy Changes required to extend 802.16 OFDMA physical layer in order to support 256-QAM and 1024-QAM constellations, along with necessary extensions to the block sizes and control codes. For acceptance as part of the 802.16r amendment. This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the Source(s) field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Copyright Policy <http://standards.ieee.org/ipr/copyrightpolicy.html>. The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>. Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat>. 1

Extension of OFDMA Physical layer mode to support 256 & 1024 point QAM constellations for high capacity back-haul applications David Castelow, Andrew Logothetis and Marlon Persaud Airspan Communications Ltd 19/03/2013 Scope This document is in response to the call for contributions to the 802.16r PAR. It specifies changes required to the IEEE Std 802.16-2012 [1] standard to implement the 256- and 1024-QAM modulation using Convolutional Turbo Codes (CTCs), together with the introduction of a new block size to allow efficient use of the increased spectral efficiency. References [1] 802.16-2012, IEEE Standard for Air Interface for Broadband Wireless Access Systems, May 2012. [2] 802.16.1-2012, IEEE Standard for WirelessMAN-Advanced Air Interface for Broadband Wireless Access Systems, September 2012. Background The 802.16r PAR calls for contributions to support high-order modulations, and specifically mentions 256, 512 and 1024 point QAM. The increase in spectral efficiency is required to support applications such as small cell backhaul. It should be noted that the 256 and 1024 point QAM are conventional square constellations that result from being of the form 2 (2n), that is not the case for 512-point QAM. It is the opinion of the authors of this contribution that system gains associated with the non-square 512-point QAM constellation are questionable and do not justify the increased complexity. Equivalent gains can be obtained using the 1024-point constellation along with stronger forward error correction. As a result this contribution does not consider 512- point QAM any further. This contribution addresses changes in the OFMDA physical layer mode only. In addition to PHY changes, we introduce a new MAC message to support signaling of both CQI and HARQ ACK/NACK from MS, as an alternative to using HARQ ACK/NACK signaling regions. Although similar to the HARQ messages used for Relay, there is no single message that allows an MS to report both CQI and HARQ ACK/NACK. Requirements Mac Message We propose to enhance the capacity of the system by eliminating the need to allocate a fixed region for CQI and HARQ ACK/NACK signals. This is appropriate for systems with very few MS and when the operating SNR for all links is high, as is envisaged for the use of the standard in Small Cell Backhaul (SCB) applications. To allow signaling of the same information, we introduce a Channel state information message (SCB_CHN_INFO). 2

Replace the following line from Table 6-51: Type Message Name Message Description Connection 110 255 Reserved With Type Message Name Message Description Connection 110 SCB_CHN_INFO CQI and HARQ ACK/NACK of received message 111 255 Reserved After section 6.3.2.3.98 introduce the following text: 6.3.2.3.99 SCB_CHN_INFO If the BS does not schedule a PUSC region in a frame and therefore not include a HARQ ACK/NACK or CQI feedback channel and makes an allocation for the MS, then an MS supporting SCB shall transmit an SCB_CHN_INFO management message in the first allocated slot. Each MS may be required to supply at most 2 CQI reports. It is the BS responsibility to schedule appropriate slots and modulation/coding to allow the MS to transmit this information. Table 6-227A SCB_CHN_INFO Syntax Size (bit) Notes SCB_CHN_INFO_Message_format() { Management Message Type = 110 8 Number of CQI Reports (-1) 1 0: 1 report, 1: 2 reports Frame Number 3 Least significant 3 bits of frame number that this message refers to. CQI Report 1 6 CQI feedback, see section 8.4.11.6 and table 8-336 CQI Report 2 6 CQI feedback, see section 8.4.11.6 and table 8-336 HARQ ACK bitmap 16 DL HARQ limited to 16 per MS. Channel Coding Channel coding procedures include randomization (see 8.4.9.1 of [1]), FEC encoding (see 8.4.9.2 of [1]), bit interleaving (see 8.4.9.3 of [1]), repetition (see 8.4.9.5 of [1]), and modulation (see 8.4.9.4 of [1]). Repetition is only applied to QPSK modulation. Based on Table 8-317 of [1], the valid FEC block sizes N EP (measured in bits prior to encoding) are: 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, 216, 240, 288, 360, 384, 432, and 480. The N EP have been chosen in such a way that for any of the predefined modulation and coding scheme, a slot s worth of data is mapped to one of the FEC blocks. Here, a new FEC block size of 320 bits is introduce for the two highest modulations. This is done to support the 5/6 rate for 256-QAM and 2/3 rate for 1024-QAM. We also introduce three new rates: 5/8 for 256-QAM, and 3/5 and 4/5 for 1024-QAM. This was done in order to support the pre-existing FEC block sizes. For CTC, the valid coding rates for 256-QAM are: 1/2 = 0.500, (N EP = 192) 5/8 = 0.625, (N EP = 240) 3

3/4 = 0.755, (N EP = 288) 5/6 = 0.833, (N EP = 320) For CTC, the valid coding rates for 1024-QAM are: 3/5 = 0.600, (N EP = 288) 2/3 = 0.667, (N EP = 320) 3/4 = 0.750, (N EP = 360) 4/5 = 0.800, (N EP = 384) Interleaving: To support higher performance in systems where we expect large packets to be encoded, we propose increasing the number of different CTC interleaver options. These are included in the changes to the tables below. The interleaver parameters have been chosen to be, as far as possible, compatible with those described in IEEE 802.16-2012 [1], either Table 8-304 or 8-305, or using values already accepted for IEEE 802.16.1-2012, table 6-309 [2]. UCD management message encoding The FEC code type and modulation type field of the UCD burst profile encodings, of Tables 11-18 of the standard [1], shall be augmented with new values: Editorial Instruction: In Table 11-18, replace FEC Code type and modulation type 150 1 53..255=Reserved With the following FEC Code type and modulation type 150 1 53 = 256-QAM (CTC) 1/2 54 = 256-QAM (CTC) 5/8 55 = 256-QAM (CTC) 3/4 56 = 256-QAM (CTC) 5/6 57 = 1024-QAM (CTC) 3/5 58 = 1024-QAM (CTC) 2/3 59 = 1024-QAM (CTC) 3/4 60 = 1024-QAM (CTC) 4/5 61..255=Reserved 4

DCD management message encoding The FEC code type and modulation type field of the DCD burst profile encodings, of Tables 11-25 of the standard [1], shall be augmented with new values: Editorial Instruction: In Table 11-25, replace FEC Code type and modulation type 150 1 53..255=Reserved With the following FEC Code type and modulation type 150 1 53 = 256-QAM (CTC) 1/2 54 = 256-QAM (CTC) 5/8 55 = 256-QAM (CTC) 3/4 56 = 256-QAM (CTC) 5/6 57 = 1024-QAM (CTC) 3/5 58 = 1024-QAM (CTC) 2/3 59 = 1024-QAM (CTC) 3/4 60 = 1024-QAM (CTC) 4/5 61..255=Reserved 8.4.9.2.3.1 CTC encoder Modify the following text: The encoding block size shall depend on the number of slots allocated and the modulation specified for the current transmission. Concatenation of a number of slots shall be performed in order to make larger blocks of coding where it is possible, with the limitation of not exceeding the largest supported block size for the applied modulation and coding. Table 8-313 specifies the concatenation of slots for different allocations and modulations. The concatenation rule shall not be used when using IR HARQ. For any modulation and FEC rate, given an allocation of n slots, the following parameters are defined: j is parameter dependent on the modulation and FEC rate p is a parameter dependent on the modulation and FEC rate n is floor(number of allocated slots * STC rate/(repetition factor * number of STC layers)) k is floor(n/j) m is n mod j Table 8-312 shows the rules used for slot concatenation when p = 1. If p 1 then Table 8-312A shall be used instead. Modify the title of Table 8-312 as follows: Table 8-312 Slots concatenation rule for CTC, if p=1. 5

Insert the following after Table 8-312: Table 8-312A Slots concatenation rule for CTC, if p 1. Slots concatenated if p 1 then the possible block sizes are 1 and m*p for m (j/p). Generate floor(n/j) blocks of size j slots, then replace n by the remainder (n-j*floor(n/j)) and j by j-p. Continue until j = p, then generate n blocks of 1 slot. Replace Encoding slot concatenation for different rates in CTC Table 8-313, Sec. 8.4.9.2.3.1 of [1], by the following text: Modulation and rate j p QPSK-1/2 10 1 QPSK-3/4 6 1 16-QAM-1/2 5 1 16-QAM-3/4 3 1 64-QAM-1/2 3 1 64-QAM-2/3 2 1 64-QAM-3/4 2 1 64-QAM-5/6 2 1 256-QAM-1/2 25 5 256-QAM-5/8 20 4 256-QAM-3/4 10 5 256-QAM-5/6 15 3 1024-QAM-3/5 10 10 1024-QAM-2/3 15 3 1024-QAM-3/4 8 8 1024-QAM-4/5 10 5 Table 8-313. Encoding slot concatenation for 1024-QAM and various rates in CTC. The Parameters for the subblock interleavers Table 8-317, Sec. 8.4.9.2.3.4.2 of [1], shall be augmented with the new block size as shown in Table 1 below: Block size (bits) N EP N Subblock interleaver parameters m 320 110 6 3 Table 1. Parameters for the subblock interleavers J 6

Augment Table 8-314 CTC channel coding per modulation, Sec. 8.4.9.2.3.1 of [1], with the contents of Table 2 below: Modulation Data block size (bytes) Encoding data block size (bytes) Code rate N P0 P1 P2 P3 256-QAM 24 48 1/2 96 7 48 24 72 256-QAM 120 240 1/2 480 53 62 12 2 256-QAM 240 480 1/2 960 43 64 300 824 256-QAM 360 720 1/2 1440 43 720 360 540 256-QAM 480 960 1/2 1920 31 8 24 16 256-QAM 600 1200 1/2 2400 53 66 24 2 256-QAM 30 48 5/8 120 13 60 0 60 256-QAM 120 192 5/8 480 53 62 12 2 256-QAM 240 384 5/8 960 43 64 300 824 256-QAM 360 576 5/8 1440 43 720 360 540 256-QAM 480 768 5/8 1920 31 8 24 16 256-QAM 600 960 5/8 2400 53 66 24 2 256-QAM 36 48 3/4 144 17 74 72 2 256-QAM 360 480 3/4 1440 43 720 360 540 256-QAM 40 48 5/6 160 17 84 108 132 256-QAM 120 144 5/6 480 53 62 12 2 256-QAM 240 288 5/6 960 43 64 300 824 256-QAM 360 432 5/6 1440 43 720 360 540 256-QAM 480 576 5/6 1920 31 8 24 16 256-QAM 600 720 5/6 2400 53 66 24 2 1024-QAM 36 60 3/5 144 17 74 72 2 1024-QAM 360 600 3/5 1440 43 720 360 540 1024-QAM 40 60 2/3 160 17 84 108 132 1024-QAM 120 180 2/3 480 53 62 12 2 1024-QAM 240 360 2/3 960 43 64 300 824 1024-QAM 360 540 2/3 1440 43 720 360 540 1024-QAM 480 720 2/3 1920 31 8 24 16 1024-QAM 600 900 2/3 2400 53 66 24 2 1024-QAM 45 60 3/4 180 11 90 0 90 1024-QAM 360 480 3/4 1440 43 720 360 540 1024-QAM 48 60 4/5 192 11 96 48 144 1024-QAM 240 300 4/5 960 43 64 300 824 1024-QAM 480 600 4/5 1920 31 8 24 16 Table 2. CTC channel coding for increased block sizes and for 256- and 1024-QAM 7

Data Modulation Modify the following text from section 8.4.9.4.2 Data modulation: After the repetition block, the data bits are entered serially to the constellation mapper. Gray-mapped QPSK and 16-QAM (as shown in Figure 8-128) shall be supported, whereas the support of 64-QAM, 256-QAM and 1024-QAM is optional. The constellations (as shown in Figure 8-128 and Figures 8-128A and 8-128B) shall be normalized by multiplying the constellation point with the indicated factor c to achieve equal average power. And add the following text and figures: The Gray-mapped 256-QAM is shown in FigureFigure 8-128A The constellation shall be normalised by multiplying the constellation point by the factor to achieve equal average power. Figure 8-128A. 256-QAM constellation 8

The Gray-mapped 1024-QAM is shown in Figure 8-128B. The constellation shall be normalised by multiplying the constellation point by the factor to achieve equal average power. Q c=1/ 682 b 4 b 3 b 2 b 1 b 0 01111 31 01110 29 01100 27 01101 25 01001 23 01000 21 01010 19 01011 17 00011 15 00010 13 00000 11 00001 9 00101 7 00100 5 00110 3 00111 10111-31 -29-27 -25-23 -21-19 -17 1-15 -13-11 -9-7 -5-3 -1-1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 I 10110-3 10100-5 10101-7 10001-9 10000-11 10010-13 10011-15 11011-17 11010-19 11000-21 11001-23 11101-25 11100-27 11110-29 11111-31 11111 11110 11100 11101 11001 11000 11010 11011 10011 10010 10000 10001 10101 10100 10110 10111 00111 00110 00100 00101 00001 00000 00010 00011 01011 01010 01000 01001 01101 01100 01110 01111 b 9 b 8 b 7 b 6 b 5 Figure 8-128B. 1024-QAM constellation 9

Capabilities Exchange There is a requirement to signal the capabilities of the SS/MS modulator/demodulator. In section: 11.8.3.5.2 OFDMA SS demodulator Modify Bits 13 15: Reserved; shall be set to zero. To read Bit 13: 256-QAM supported. Bit 14: 1024-QAM supported. Bit 15: Reserved; shall be set to zero. In section 11.8.3.5.3 OFDMA SS modulator Modify the table as follows: Type Length Value Scope 152 1variable Bit 0: 64-QAM Bit 1: BTC Bit 2: CTC Bit 3: STC Bit 4: HARQ chase Bit 5: CTC_IR Bit 6: CC_IR Bit 7: LDPC Bit 8: 256-QAM Bit 9: 1024-QAM SBC-REQ (see 6.3.2.3.23) SBC-RSP (see 6.3.2.3.24) 1