AP MUSIC THEORY 2016 SCORING GUIDELINES

Similar documents
AP MUSIC THEORY 2013 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP MUSIC THEORY 2011 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP MUSIC THEORY 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP Music Theory. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 7. Scoring Guideline.

AP Music Theory 2013 Scoring Guidelines

AP Music Theory 2010 Scoring Guidelines

AP Music Theory. Scoring Guidelines

AP MUSIC THEORY 2006 SCORING GUIDELINES. Question 7

AP MUSIC THEORY 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP Music Theory. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 5. Scoring Guideline.

AP MUSIC THEORY 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP Music Theory 1999 Scoring Guidelines

Student Performance Q&A:

Student Performance Q&A:

Theory Bowl. Round 3: Harmony, Voice Leading and Analysis

CHAPTER ONE TWO-PART COUNTERPOINT IN FIRST SPECIES (1:1)

Student Performance Q&A:

Student Performance Q&A:

Student Performance Q&A:

AP Music Theory. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 3. Scoring Guideline.

The following are Guidelines good places to start when working through a part-writing exercise.

GRADUATE/ transfer THEORY PLACEMENT EXAM guide. Texas woman s university

Unit 5b: Bach chorale (technical study)

AP Music Theory. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 4. Scoring Guideline.

AP Music Theory. Practice Exam. Advanced Placement Program

King Edward VI College, Stourbridge Starting Points in Composition and Analysis

Chorale Completion Cribsheet

Course Objectives The objectives for this course have been adapted and expanded from the 2010 AP Music Theory Course Description from:

Study Guide. Solutions to Selected Exercises. Foundations of Music and Musicianship with CD-ROM. 2nd Edition. David Damschroder

AP Music Theory. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 1. Scoring Guideline.

AP MUSIC THEORY 2016 SCORING GUIDELINES

Partimenti Pedagogy at the European American Musical Alliance, Derek Remeš

Descending- and ascending- 5 6 sequences (sequences based on thirds and seconds):

AP Music Theory at the Career Center Chris Garmon, Instructor

PART-WRITING CHECKLIST

NUMBER OF TIMES COURSE MAY BE TAKEN FOR CREDIT: One

AP MUSIC THEORY STUDY GUIDE Max Kirkpatrick 5/10/08

AP Music Theory Syllabus CHS Fine Arts Department

Virginia Commonwealth University MHIS 146 Outline Notes. Open and Closed Positions of Triads Never more than an octave between the upper three voices

AP Music Theory Syllabus

AP Music Theory COURSE OBJECTIVES STUDENT EXPECTATIONS TEXTBOOKS AND OTHER MATERIALS

Course Overview. At the end of the course, students should be able to:

Advanced Harmony December 2014

MELODIC AND RHYTHMIC EMBELLISHMENT IN TWO VOICE COMPOSITION. Chapter 10

AP Music Theory Syllabus

Cadence fingerprints

A.P. Music Theory Class Expectations and Syllabus Pd. 1; Days 1-6 Room 630 Mr. Showalter

Student Performance Q&A: 2001 AP Music Theory Free-Response Questions

How Figured Bass Works

SPECIES COUNTERPOINT

MUS305: AP Music Theory. Hamilton High School

BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX...

Workbooks for undergraduate counterpoint 1-4

Leaving Certificate 2017: Music Marking Scheme Composing Higher level - Core. SECTION A MELODY COMPOSITION (40 marks) Q Descriptors Mark

Example 1 (W.A. Mozart, Piano Trio, K. 542/iii, mm ):

AP Music Theory Policies and Procedures

MUSIC THEORY CURRICULUM STANDARDS GRADES Students will sing, alone and with others, a varied repertoire of music.

AP Music Theory Syllabus

Murrieta Valley Unified School District High School Course Outline February 2006

Lesson RRR: Dominant Preparation. Introduction:


Acknowledgements... ii Preface... iii CHAPTER CHAPTER CHAPTER CHAPTER CHAPTER CHAPTER 6...

PRACTICE FINAL EXAM. Fill in the metrical information missing from the table below. (3 minutes; 5%) Meter Signature

AP Music Theory Rudiments II and Analysis Exam

NUMBER OF TIMES COURSE MAY BE TAKEN FOR CREDIT: One

MUS100: Introduction to Music Theory. Hamilton High School

MMTA Written Theory Exam Requirements Level 3 and Below. b. Notes on grand staff from Low F to High G, including inner ledger lines (D,C,B).

AP Music Theory Syllabus

In all creative work melody writing, harmonising a bass part, adding a melody to a given bass part the simplest answers tend to be the best answers.

Lesson One. New Terms. a note between two chords, dissonant to the first and consonant to the second. example

BLUE VALLEY DISTRICT CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION Music 9-12/Honors Music Theory

FREEHOLD REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION MUSIC DEPARTMENT MUSIC THEORY 1. Grade Level: 9-12.

NJCCCS AREA: North Brunswick Township Public Schools. AP Music Theory. Acknowledgements: Written by: James Egan, Band Director

AP Music Theory Syllabus Music Theory I Syllabus Cypress Lake Center for the Arts Gary Stroh, instructor School Year

Theory Placement Exam 1

MUSIC 2107 Summary of SATB Part-Writing Guidelines Dr. C. Ross

Piano Teacher Program

Working with unfigured (or under-figured) early Italian Baroque bass lines

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 PREREQUISITES FOR WRITING AN ARRANGEMENT... 1

Course Schedule 1 DATE TOPICS AND READING ASSIGNMENTS THEORY ASSIGNMENTS DUE

Level 10 Harmony & Counterpoint

Comprehensive Course Syllabus-Music Theory

15. Corelli Trio Sonata in D, Op. 3 No. 2: Movement IV (for Unit 3: Developing Musical Understanding)

Course Syllabus Phone: (770)

Music Department Columbia University Ear Training Curriculum, Fall 2012 Sing and Play at the Piano Face the Music

AP Music Theory Course Planner

NOT USE INK IN THIS CLASS!! A

Curriculum Development In the Fairfield Public Schools FAIRFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT MUSIC THEORY I

2014 Music Performance GA 3: Aural and written examination

DOWNLOAD PDF LESS COMMON METERS : C CLEFS AND HARMONIC PROGRESSION

Module # 4 Musical analysis and contemporary music Designer : Anthony Girard

Stylistic features Antonio Vivaldi: Concerto in D minor, Op. 3 No. 11

AP Music Theory. Course Description. Course Objectives. Rachel Pack

œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ { œ œ œ œ Level III Advanced Jaques-Dalcroze Certification Improvisation

AP Music Theory Course Syllabus Mr. Don Leonard

Theory I (MUSI 1310) Professor: Andrew Davis

Advanced Placement (AP) Music Theory

The Baroque 1/4 ( ) Based on the writings of Anna Butterworth: Stylistic Harmony (OUP 1992)

Theory II (MUSI 1311) Professor: Andrew Davis ( )

Guidance Notes on Briefs Assessing Technique

Transcription:

2016 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 7 0---9 points A. ARRIVING AT A SCORE FOR THE ENTIRE QUESTION 1. Score each phrase separately and then add the phrase scores together to arrive at a preliminary tally for the entire question. 2. Before deciding on the final score for the entire question, consider giving an extra point to responses that are extremely good or those that would otherwise receive a score of 0 (see E.2. (a)---(b) below). 3. Except for instances where the guidelines specify otherwise, judge the bass and Roman numerals separately and ignore mismatches between them. 4. Errors are categorized as either minor or egregious. Two minor errors equal one (see D below). B. SCORING PHRASE 2 (0---2 points) 1. Judge the bass and Roman numerals separately, considering each in two halves: The first half consists of the opening beat and the approach to it. The second half consists of the last two notes (the cadence). 2. The phrase is scored 2 if the bass has no s and the final two Roman numerals match the last two bass notes (even if the first Roman numeral is incorrect). N.B.: A phrase that receives 2 points must have a good cadence in both bass and Roman numerals, with the bass and Roman numerals (and inversions) matching one another; otherwise, give the phrase at most 1 point. 3. The phrase is scored 1 if: (a) the bass has no s, but any of the two final Roman numerals (and inversions) do not match the final bass notes; (b) one-half of the bass contains an, and at least one-half of the Roman numerals has no s; or (c) both halves of the bass have an, but the Roman numerals have no egregious errors. 4. The phrase is scored 0 if: (a) both halves of the bass have an, and at least one-half of the Roman numerals has an ; or (b) at least one-half of the bass has an, and both halves of the Roman numerals have s. Summary of the Method for Scoring Phrase 2 Bass Line Roman numerals Score No s Roman numerals (and inversions) must match 2 bass notes No s First half of phrase contains an, 2 but the cadence is good One-half of the phrase contains an No s 1 One-half of the phrase contains an One-half of the phrase contains an egregious 1 error Both halves of the phrase contain an No s 1 Both halves of the phrase contain an One-half of the phrase contains an egregious 0 error One-half of the phrase contains an Both halves of phrase contain an egregious error 0

2016 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 7 (continued) C. SCORING PHRASES 3 AND 4 1. For each of these phrases, judge the bass and Roman numerals separately, considering each in two halves. The first five beats comprise the first half of each phrase. The last three notes and their approach comprise the last half of each phrase. 2. Then provide a phrase descriptor both for the bass line and for the Roman numerals according to the following guidelines: (a) Judge it to be good even if it contains a specific and one minor error. (b) Judge it to be fair if: (i) it contains two s or two s and one minor error; or (ii) it contains three or more s, but one-half of the phrase is without egregious error. (c) Judge it to be poor if it contains three or more specific s, with at least one in each half of the phrase. Summary of Good/Fair/Poor Determinations for Bass Lines and Roman numerals for Phrases 3 and 4 good 0-- 1 s (+ 1 minor error) fair 2 s (+ 1 minor error) poor 3 or more s 3. Combine the descriptors to arrive at the following preliminary scores: Summary of the Method for Scoring Phrases 3 and 4 Bass Line Roman numerals Score good good to fair 3 good poor 2 fair good to fair 2 fair poor 1 poor good to fair 1 poor poor 0 4. Before giving a final score of 0 or 3, first consider the cadence. (a) Award at least 1 point for the phrase if its cadence (i.e., its final two chords considered by themselves) is good in both bass and Roman numerals, even if nothing else in the phrase is good; the bass and Roman numerals (and inversions) must agree in this case. (b) A phrase that receives 3 points must have a good cadence in both bass and Roman numerals, with the bass and Roman numerals (and inversions) matching one another; otherwise, give the phrase at most 2 points. 5. Award at most 2 points to a phrase that uses half notes exclusively or almost exclusively.

2016 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 7 (continued) D. WEIGHTING ERRORS 1. The following are s: (a) Blatant violations of the instructions. (b) Parallel octaves or fifths, or diminished fifth to perfect fifth. (c) Doubling the leading tone; unresolved or incorrectly resolved leading tone. (d) Tonally inappropriate six-four chord (N.B.: Cadential six-fours, passing six-fours, and pedal sixfours are allowed). (e) Unresolved sevenths or incorrectly resolved sevenths. (f) Other note-against-note dissonances (including fourths) that are not treated correctly, including Roman numerals (and inversions) that do not match with the given melody note. (g) Poor chord succession (e.g., V-- IV; V-- ii; ii-- iii; IV-- iii, ii-- I; V 6 -- I 6 ; V-- vi 6 ; iii-- viiº, etc.). (h) Root-position leading-tone chord (vii o ) followed by anything other than root-position I. (i) Poor chord use, such as vi 6 (unless as part of parallel 6 3 sequence or modulation); iii 6 (unless as part of parallel 6 3 sequence). (j) Inappropriate leaps (sevenths, augmented fourths, augmented seconds, compound intervals, etc.), successive leaps in the same direction that do not outline a triad, or leaps of an octave that do not change direction. (k) An entire phrase of consecutive thirds or sixths (applicable to phrases 3 and 4). 2. The following are minor errors (two minor errors = one ): (a) Repeated notes and/or Roman numerals and inversions from weak beat to strong beat (unless at start of phrase, or if the second note is a suspension). (b) Rhythmically inappropriate six-four chords. (c) Approach to octave or fifth in similar motion in which the upper voice leaps, or consecutive perfect fifths and octaves in contrary motion. (d) Cross-relations. (e) Root-position viiº triads that move directly to I. (f) Four or more consecutive thirds or sixths for half of a phrase. E. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 1. General considerations: (a) Consider each phrase independently; do not judge the connections between each phrase. (b) Ignore any inner voices supplied by the students; ignore any/all extraneous labels (nonchord tones, etc.). (c) Judge the bass line as either part of a contrapuntal two-part framework or as a bass line for a four-part harmony exercise, giving the student the benefit of the doubt. (d) In judging harmonies, always consider the implied bass line suggested by the Roman numerals (and inversions). 2. Special scores: (a) Award 1 bonus point for a truly musical response or for a response that is solid throughout. (b) Award 1 point to a response that otherwise would earn a 0 but that has two or more redeeming qualities. 0 This score is used for a response that represents an unsuccessful attempt to answer the question (has no redeeming qualities, or only one) or a response that is off-topic or irrelevant. ----- The dash is reserved for blank responses.

2016 SCORING COMMENTARY Question 7 Overview This question assessed students ability to: compose a bass line following the rules of eighteenth-century counterpoint; write standard cadences; harmonize a melody with an appropriate chord progression; use conventional harmonic patterns; recognize and correctly use a secondary dominant chord; avoid creating doubled leading tones; and use embellishments correctly in a two-part framework. Sample: 7A Score: 9 This represents an excellent response. In the second phrase the student successfully resolves the leading tone immediately preceding the "Start here" indication and follows this with a root position cadence that properly acknowledges the chromaticism in the given melody. This phrase was awarded 2 points. Phrase three begins with a bass line that moves both conjunctly and in contrary motion with the given melody. The harmonic progression also works well in this phrase, and the entire phrase was awarded 3 points. Phrase four contains one minor error of a direct octave on beat three of measure 7 but is otherwise without error. The final phrase was awarded 3 points. This is an example of a truly musical response to the question and was therefore also awarded a bonus point, for a total score of 9. Sample: 7B Score: 4 This represents a fair response. The "Start here" phrase contains an arpeggiation on beat two of measure 4 that creates an augmented octave and then unequal octaves into the fermata. This phrase was awarded 1 point. Phrase three contains parallel octaves over the bar line into measure 6. The Roman numerals suggest the same parallel octaves. In addition, the second beat of measure 6 cannot be harmonized with a ii chord that does not acknowledge that the melody note would be the seventh of the chord. This error weakens the cadence in the Roman numerals, and the phrase was therefore awarded 2 points. The bass line of phrase four contains parallel octaves from beat one to beat two in measure 7, an incorrect fourth on beat three of the same measure, and a leap of an augmented fourth into the final measure of the phrase. The Roman numerals contain an incorrect use of vi 6 and V 6 4. The fourth phrase was awarded 1 point. The scoring summary was 1/2/1 for a total score of 4. Sample: 7C Score: 1 This represents a poor response. The leading tone immediately preceding the "Start here" indication is not resolved in either the bass or Roman numerals. The bass also includes an inappropriate anticipation before the note at the fermata. The tonicization is not acknowledged in the Roman numerals. Phrase two was awarded 0 points. Phrase three contains a direct fifth on the second beat of measure 5, as well as weak to strong repetition over the bar line of measure 6. These two minor errors equal one. The A in the bass under the fermata does not work at this cadence. The Roman numerals contain numerous poor chord successions, including ii iii, IV iii, and iii ii. Roman numeral ii is also inappropriate at the cadence. The third phrase was awarded 1 point. Phrase four contains two parallel octaves at the beginning of measure 7. The penultimate bass note is not acceptable at the cadence. The Roman numerals imply the

2016 SCORING COMMENTARY Question 7 (continued) same parallel octaves in measure 7. The V IV progression over the bar line into the final measure is considered poor chord succession, and neither of the IV chords in the final measure match the given melody note. This phrase was awarded 0 points. The scoring summary was 0/1/0 for an overall score of 1.