Further Investigation of Bit Multiplexing in 400GbE PMA

Similar documents
Further Clarification of FEC Performance over PAM4 links with Bit-multiplexing

Summary of NRZ CDAUI proposals

100Gb/s Single-lane SERDES Discussion. Phil Sun, Credo Semiconductor IEEE New Ethernet Applications Ad Hoc May 24, 2017

802.3bj FEC Overview and Status. 400GbE PCS Baseline Proposal DRAFT. IEEE P802.3bs 400 Gb/s Ethernet Task Force

CDAUI-8 Chip-to-Module (C2M) System Analysis #3. Ben Smith and Stephane Dallaire, Inphi Corporation IEEE 802.3bs, Bonita Springs, September 2015

50 Gb/s per lane MMF baseline proposals. P802.3cd, Whistler, BC 21 st May 2016 Jonathan King, Finisar Jonathan Ingham, FIT

Component BW requirement of 56Gbaud Modulations for 400GbE 2 & 10km PMD

802.3bj FEC Overview and Status IEEE P802.3bm

Analysis on Feasibility to Support a 40km Objective in 50/200/400GbE. Xinyuan Wang, Yu Xu Huawei Technologies

Updated Considerations on 400Gb/s Ethernet SMF PMDs

64G Fibre Channel strawman update. 6 th Dec 2016, rv1 Jonathan King, Finisar

Investigation on Technical Feasibility of Stronger RS FEC for 400GbE

802.3bj FEC Overview and Status. PCS, FEC and PMA Sublayer Baseline Proposal DRAFT. IEEE P802.3ck

System Evolution with 100G Serial IO

PAM8 Baseline Proposal

More Insights of IEEE 802.3ck Baseline Reference Receivers

DataCom: Practical PAM4 Test Methods for Electrical CDAUI8/VSR-PAM4, Optical 400G-BASE LR8/FR8/DR4

A Way to Evaluate post-fec BER based on IBIS-AMI Model

Further information on PAM4 error performance and power budget considerations

Optical transmission feasibility for 400GbE extended reach PMD. Yoshiaki Sone NTT IEEE802.3 Industry Connections NG-ECDC Ad hoc, Whistler, May 2016

100GBASE-FR2, -LR2 Baseline Proposal

100G PSM4 & RS(528, 514, 7, 10) FEC. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies September 2012

The Case of the Closing Eyes: Is PAM the Answer? Is NRZ dead?

Draft Baseline Proposal for CDAUI-8 Chipto-Module (C2M) Electrical Interface (NRZ)

100G SR4 Link Model Update & TDP. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies January 2013

Proposed reference equalizer change in Clause 124 (TDECQ/SECQ. methodologies).

Reducing input dynamic range of SOA-preamplifier for 100G-EPON upstream

100G MMF 20m & 100m Link Model Comparison. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies March 2013

On Figure of Merit in PAM4 Optical Transmitter Evaluation, Particularly TDECQ

CDAUI-8 Chip-to-Module (C2M) System Analysis. Stephane Dallaire and Ben Smith, September 2, 2015

Baseline proposal update

50GbE and NG 100GbE Logic Baseline Proposal

Technical Feasibility of Single Wavelength 400GbE 2km &10km application

32 G/64 Gbaud Multi Channel PAM4 BERT

Application Space of CAUI-4/ OIF-VSR and cppi-4

FEC Codes for 400 Gbps 802.3bs. Sudeep Bhoja, Inphi Vasu Parthasarathy, Broadcom Zhongfeng Wang, Broadcom

100GBASE-DR2: A Baseline Proposal for the 100G 500m Two Lane Objective. Brian Welch (Luxtera)

Ali Ghiasi. Nov 8, 2011 IEEE GNGOPTX Study Group Atlanta

Problems of high DFE coefficients

FEC Architectural Considerations

Duobinary Transmission over ATCA Backplanes

100G EDR and QSFP+ Cable Test Solutions

Comment #147, #169: Problems of high DFE coefficients

SECQ Test Method and Calibration Improvements

Impact of Clock Content on the CDR with Propose Resolution

Improving the Performance of Advanced Modulation Scheme. Yoshiaki Sone NTT IEEE802.3bs 400 Gb/s Ethernet Task Force, San Antonio, Novenver 2014.

LOW POWER DIGITAL EQUALIZATION FOR HIGH SPEED SERDES. Masum Hossain University of Alberta

40G SWDM4 MSA Technical Specifications Optical Specifications

Proposal for 400GE Optical PMD for 2km SMF Objective based on 4 x 100G PAM4

MR Interface Analysis including Chord Signaling Options

400G-FR4 Technical Specification

Transmission Strategies for 10GBase-T over CAT- 6 Copper Wiring. IEEE Meeting November 2003

Ali Ghiasi. Jan 23, 2011 IEEE GNGOPTX Study Group Newport Beach

Clause 74 FEC and MLD Interactions. Magesh Valliappan Broadcom Mark Gustlin - Cisco

Toward Convergence of FEC Interleaving Schemes for 400GE

50 Gb/s per lane MMF objectives. IEEE 50G & NGOATH Study Group January 2016, Atlanta, GA Jonathan King, Finisar

100G CWDM Link Model for DM DFB Lasers. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies May 2013

40G SWDM4 MSA Technical Specifications Optical Specifications

An Approach To 25GbE SMF 10km Specification IEEE Plenary (Macau) Kohichi Tamura

Comparison of options for 40 Gb/s PMD for 10 km duplex SMF and recommendations

100GBASE-SR4 Extinction Ratio Requirement. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies September 2013

Brian Holden Kandou Bus, S.A. IEEE GE Study Group September 2, 2013 York, United Kingdom

Baseline Proposal for 200 Gb/s Ethernet 40 km SMF 200GBASE-ER4 in 802.3cn

WWDM Transceiver Update and 1310 nm eye-safety

Analysis of Link Budget for 3m Cable Objective

Analysis of Link Budget for 3m Cable Objective

100G-FR and 100G-LR Technical Specifications

CAUI-4 Chip to Chip and Chip to Module Applications

Next Generation Ultra-High speed standards measurements of Optical and Electrical signals

New Results on QAM-Based 1000BASE-T Transceiver

500 m SMF Objective Baseline Proposal

Comparison of NRZ, PR-2, and PR-4 signaling. Qasim Chaudry Adam Healey Greg Sheets

TDECQ update noise treatment and equalizer optimization (revision of king_3bs_01_0117) 14th February 2017 P802.3bs SMF ad hoc Jonathan King, Finisar

Thoughts about adaptive transmitter FFE for 802.3ck Chip-to-Module. Adee Ran, Intel Phil Sun, Credo Adam Healey, Broadcom

Combating Closed Eyes Design & Measurement of Pre-Emphasis and Equalization for Lossy Channels

Combating Closed Eyes Design & Measurement of Pre-Emphasis and Equalization for Lossy Channels

200GBASE-DR4: A Baseline Proposal for the 200G 500m Objective. Brian Welch (Luxtera)

10GBASE-LRM Interoperability & Technical Feasibility Report

Investigation of PAM-4/6/8 Signaling and FEC for 100 Gb/s Serial Transmission

Performance Results: High Gain FEC over DMT

Update on FEC Proposal for 10GbE Backplane Ethernet. Andrey Belegolovy Andrey Ovchinnikov Ilango. Ganga Fulvio Spagna Luke Chang

CAUI-4 Chip to Chip Simulations

100GEL C2M Channel Reach Update

EVLA Fiber Selection Critical Design Review

52Gb/s Chip to Module Channels using zqsfp+ Mike Dudek QLogic Barrett Bartell Qlogic Tom Palkert Molex Scott Sommers Molex 10/23/2014

Features: Compliance: Applications: Warranty: QSFP-40G-LR4-GT 40GBASE-LR4 QSFP+ SMF Module Cisco Compatible

Presentation to IEEE P802.3ap Backplane Ethernet Task Force July 2004 Working Session

CAUI-4 Application Requirements

Achieving BER/FLR targets with clause 74 FEC. Phil Sun, Marvell Adee Ran, Intel Venugopal Balasubramonian, Marvell Zhenyu Liu, Marvell

Investigation of PAM-4/6/8 Signaling and FEC for 100 Gb/s Serial Transmission

Architectural Considera1on for 100 Gb/s/lane Systems

IEEE P802.3bs D Gb/s & 400 Gb/s Ethernet Initial Working Group ballot comments

Measurements and Simulation Results in Support of IEEE 802.3bj Objective

Simulations of Duobinary and NRZ Over Selected IEEE Channels (Including Jitter and Crosstalk)

Line Signaling and FEC Performance Comparison for 25Gb/s 100GbE IEEE Gb/s Backplane and Cable Task Force Chicago, September 2011

Practical Receiver Equalization Tradeoffs Applicable to Next- Generation 28 Gb/s Links with db Loss Channels

PAM4 signals for 400 Gbps: acquisition for measurement and signal processing

Issues for fair comparison of PAM4 and DMT

40GBASE-ER4 optical budget

IBIS-AMI Post-Simulation Analysis

Transcription:

Further Investigation of Bit Multiplexing in 400GbE PMA Tongtong Wang, Xinyuan Wang, Wenbin Yang HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. IEEE 802.3bs 400 GbE Task Force

Introduction and Background Bit-Mux in PMA is a general advantageous for simple optical module implementation to lower cost, power and form factor This presentation investigates the Bit-Mux in PMA and its influence to FEC performance on different error model and multiplexing scheme big_ticket_items_3bs_01_0115 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 2

Error Models in PAM4 Signaling Random errors introduced by Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) Consecutive and discrete random error bits on PAM4 2:1 bit muxing Consecutive and discrete random error bits on PAM4 4:1 bit muxing Crosstalk or interference noise are different to AWGN, it leads to consecutive or discrete error, possibly overlays on random error by AWGN noise. Correlated error induced by electronic equalizer, for example DFE or MLSE, is possible of having single or two signal level transition errors. Two signal level transition error Single signal level transition error HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 3

FEC Performance on PAM4 Bit-mux with Random Error by AWGN Random error model for any error patterns, including burst error by Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN), is depicted in the light dark curve. Crosstalk, interference error should be covered by system design, also depend on FEC margin to cover these consecutive/discrete bit errors. FEC performance of random error caused by AWGN, not including crosstalk or interference errors. anslow_3bs_02_1114 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 4

FEC Performance on PAM4 bit-mux with Error Propagation Correlated error induced by electronic equalizer, will lower FEC performance in Non-FOM bit muxing. Two signal level transition error that corrupt both MSB/LSB in PAM4 has similar FEC performance as NRZ signaling Correlated error caused by error propagation on NRZ Correlated error caused by error propagation on PAM4 MSB LSB anslow_3bs_02_1114 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 5

FEC Performance on PAM4 bit-mux with Error Propagation (Cont d) PAM4 correlated error performance? Two signal level transition has worst FEC performance Single signal level transition error incurs only a single bit error per PAM4 symbol with gray coding, happens on either MSB or LSB Considering different error patterns in 4 PAM4 symbol with correlated errors with single signal level transition error, what is the impact on FEC performance with FOM bit muxing and Non FOM bit muxing? Correlated error longer than 4 symbol has lower probability Any error patterns in 4 PAM4 symbol are possible, use worst case error pattern to evaluate FEC performance in this contribution HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 6

PAM4 Error Patterns for Single Signal Level Transition Error 4/3/2 PAM4 symbol correlated error have following error patterns: 01 23 01 2 01 Error patterns in 4 symbol burst error Error patterns in 3 symbol burst error Error patterns in 2 symbol burst error Each error pattern has different impact on FEC Performance For example, the left error pattern will cause 1 symbol error by 35% and 15% 2 symbol error in 01 23 FOM bit mux Red circle in diagram indicates the worst case for FOM bit muxing, green circle for nonfom bit muxing HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 7

KP4 FEC Performance on PAM4 bit-mux with Single Signal Level Transition Error Assume error propagate parameter a=0.5 With KP4 FEC, FOM bit muxing performance is close to random error curve on PAM4 and NRZ Non FOM bit muxing will degrade FEC performance HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 8

DFE in Electrical Link For CDAUI-16 specification in 802.3bs, reference to Chip-Chip interface of CAUI-4 in 802.3bm For Chip-Chip PAM4 proposal of CAUI-8 interface in 802.3bs anslow_03_0913_optx li_3bs_01a_0115 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 9

DFE Usage in NRZ Optical Link For example, ~1dB gain from DFE to improve RX optical sensitivity as in light blue measure With a=0.5, The penalty of DFE is only ~0.3dB for KP4 FEC with FOM bit mux lyubomirsky_400_01_1113 With FOM bit-mux, KP4 FEC performance will be close to random error curve with error propagation by DFE in RX Equalizer, HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 10

DFE/MLSE Usage in PAM4 Optical link Chris Cole, Ilya Lyubomirsky, Ali Ghiasi, Vivek Telang, Higher-Order Modulation for Client Optics, IEEE Communications Magazine, March 2013 Figure 2 shows an RX DSP-based adaptive equalizer with feed-forward equalizer (FFE) and decision feedback equalizer (DFE) blocks. PAM-4 Four Wavelength 400Gb/s solution on Duplex SMF in conroy_3bs_01a_0914 An FFE is characterized by the number of taps and their spacing; either T-spaced (symbol rate) or T/2-spaced (fractional). An FFE approximates the channel matched filter response and equalizes the precursor portion of the ISI. A DFE is characterized by the number of taps and cancels the post-cursor portion of the ISI. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 11

BER Requirement of Electrical Link with Non-FOM Bit Mux According to previous FEC performance evaluations (anslow_3bs_02_1114), Non-FOM bit mux proposal with KR4 FEC will require 4.6E-8 BER in multiple part link, including electrical and optical links; Or to shorten channel length to lower Insert loss or improve target BER of CDAUI-8 If use KP4 FEC for all PMDs in 802.3bs, it will require MMF PMD operating at 3% Over-clocking. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 12

Non-FOM Bit mux FOM Bit Mux Comparison of FOM/NonFOM Bit-Mux Pros One FEC instances Architecture No additional electrical interface layout rule Close to Random error FEC performance in face of error propagation Enable DFE/MLSE like equalizer in Electrical/Optical link Match 1E-6 BER target in C-C/C-M CDAUI-8 interface No requirement of 3% over-clock if MMF PMDs reuse 802.3bm specification Robust to burst error introduced by interference/crosstalk Cons Degraded FEC performance in face of error propagation Almost rule out DFE/MLSE like electrical equalizer in Optical link If KR4 FEC in host, electrical interface will operate at ~1E-8 or limited to short channel If only KP4 FEC in host to match 1E-6 BER target in electrical interface, mmf PMD will operate at 3% over-clock Not robust to burst error introduced by interference on optical link Not robust to burst error introduced by crosstalk on multi-lanes electrical interface Multi-FEC instances Architecture Additional electrical interface layout rule required HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 13

Summary PMA Option 1: Prefer to use FOM bit multiplexing as primary scheme for a robust logic architecture PMA Option 2: Use NON-FOM bit multiplexing if all the listed implementation constrains are satisfied HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 14

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Thank you