The Economic Problem with Music And How Music Streaming Could Solve it

Similar documents
CMU:DIY. CMUdiy.com/streamingbusiness

A Note on Classification of Streaming Services in ISIC and CPC

Polaris Nordic Digital Music in the Nordics. By: Simon Bugge Jensen & Marie Christiansen Krøyer

Music. Switzerland s live music market reaches its limits as the number of events increases.

Using digital content and online shopping n=4020

BROADCASTING DISTRIBUTION STATISTICAL AND FINANCIAL SUMMARIES. Cable, Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) and Direct-to-Home (DTH)

How does legislation oblige broadcasters, distribution platforms and VOD providers to finance film production in Europe?

JASPER DONAT PRESIDENT - MUSIC MATTERS JANUARY 2010

CMU:DIY. CMUdiy.com/makingmoney

FILM, TV & GAMES CONFERENCE 2015

We stand for competition and media diversity

3. Television and audio-visual

Issues Paper. Motion picture, video and television programme production, sound recording and music publishing services. ROHAN DRAPER Statistics Sweden

Introduction slide 1 Digital Television 1. produced consumed New companies online continuation experimentation fragmenting reception dispersed

Beyond Broadcast Innovative models of content delivery

LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS: Maintaining an Important Presence in 2016 & Beyond. August Copyright All Rights Reserved.

Shouting toward each other: Economics, ideology, and public service television policy

Additional media information United States & United Kingdom

POLICY ON FAIR REGULATION OF BROADCASTERS

Extraordinary Together. Zee Entertainment Entertainment Content Company

Hot Data, Cool Trends

Expanding music s frontiers. Worldwide. Online. For our members.

31 January , , ,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000

ZEE TELEFILMS LIMITED

FILM ON DIGITAL VIDEO

CMU:DIY. CMUdiy.com/nfts2019

TURNING DIGITAL. The Future Can't Wait. Annual Report XVI Edition

PRIMACOM REPORTS 2000 RESULTS

Economics and Business Advanced Unit 4B: The Wider Economic Environment and Business

Extraordinary Together. Zee Entertainment Entertainment Content Company

Financial Summary of 3Q/FY2006 Business Strategy. February 2007 SKY Perfect Communications Inc.

INTERIM RESULTS SKY NETWORK TELEVISION LIMITED INTERIM RESULTS DECEMBER 2018

Why split up Netflix?

etflix Reducing Our Rating from BUY to HOLD

From Cloud to Consumer, TV Everywhere Business Realities

PUBLISHING COPYRIGHT SPLITSHEET ROYALTIES (INDIE ARTISTS)

(1) The fee for the use of a work in a film shall be as follows: (2) The fee for the use of a work in an event recording shall be as follows:

Extraordinary Together. Zee Entertainment Entertainment Content Company

Telecommunications: Diffuse. America. The Netflix case.

Slide 1. Fox Kids Europe NV

Quit Cable & Satellite, Keep TV and $ave. Marcia Siehr and Rob Nunez

Motion Picture, Video and Television Program Production, Post-Production and Distribution Activities

YOUR APRA ROYALTY STATEMENT EXPLAINED

Chapter 8.2. Distribution of Entertainment

YOUR APRA ROYALTY STATEMENT EXPLAINED

Legal conditions and criteria for film funding in Europe

Adults say the music industry is one of the most changed industries, second only to the technology industry.

RUSSIA / UKRAINE / OTHER CIS INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY JULY 23, 2007

Online from the City of Music

LABELS AT WORK: THE MUSIC BUSINESS IN THE DIGITAL AGE

Why TV in 2018? WHY KOB ADVERTISING

Discussion Materials December 10, 2012

VIDEO-ON-DEMAND DOWNLOAD AND STREAMING

Netflix and the Demand for Cinema Tickets - An Analysis for 19 European Countries

Extraordinary Together. Zee Entertainment Entertainment Content Company

Netflix (Stock exchange: NFLX)

TV Subscriptions and Licence Fees

Future-Proof Hotel Software for IPTV Systems

Catalogue no XIE. Television Broadcasting Industries

Connected Life Market Watch:

APPLICATION FORM FOR A CABLE BROADCASTING LICENCE


Source 1: The Changing Landscape of the Music Business

Statistical, ecosystems and competitiveness analysis of the Media and Content industries. Validation workshop, October 2011

HOW AUSTRALIANS WATCH TV

Why Netflix Is Still Undervalued

Direct tv commercials 2017

Quarterly Performance Update Q3 FY19

2016 Cord Cutter & Cord Never Study

SKY TELEVISION NETWORK

Mobile TV Goes Hollywood: Opportunities for Broadcasters. Doug Rasor Vice President Manager Worldwide Strategic Marketing

Aniel Nieves-González. Fall 2015

REACHING THE UN-REACHABLE

For Consumer Product Strategy Professionals

Future of TV. Features and Benefits

TMT Conference. London, 7 th June 2006

NAME: SECTION DATE. John Chalmers. Used Fall 2002

Company Overview. November 2012

Introduction. Barbara Mitra 1

Title VI in an IP Video World

The future of TV: It s blurred

Fios TV for Business rate card & packages. Rate Card

BUY Current Price: $21.28 Target Price: $24.36 Market Cap: 3.39B S&P Debt Rating B+

Hathway Cable &Datacom Limited

Television, Internet and Mobile Usage in the U.S. A2/M2 Three Screen Report

Nine months ended 30 September Premiere. Fernsehen erster Klasse. 1

1. Introduction. 2. Part A: Executive Summary

BPI the British recorded music industry BRITISH ARTISTS SCORE HIGHEST RECORDED SHARE OF GLOBAL MUSIC SALES

ONLINE VIDEO. Market situation

Consumers Continue to Carve Out More Time for Media

A Boutique Streaming Platform

Strong all-round performance

ENCRYPTING FOR GROWTH

DRAFT Changing TV Landscape

Meeting with Investors

Communications Market Report United Kingdom Published 3 August 2017

Digital Television Transition in US

Strategic Transformation

Eros International Plc Corporate Presentation

Netflix & American Latinos: An Integrated Marketing Communications Plan. Anthony Morelle Jose Velez Borbon Melissa Greco Lopes

Transcription:

The Economic Problem with Music And How Music Streaming Could Solve it Prof. Dr. Peter Tschmuck Department of Cultural Management and Gender Studies (IKM) University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna Anton-von-Webern-Platz 1 1030 Vienna, Austria Tel.: ++43-1-71155-3415 email: Tschmuck@mdw.ac.at webpage: http://musicbusinessresearch.wordpress.com/

Contents Music as an economic good The challenges of the music streaming business model The revenue streams for Austrian indie labels

Music as an economic good

Music as a public good (Samuelson 1954) Private goods Excludability in consumption Rivalry in consumption Public goods Non-excludability in consumption Non-rivalry in consumption => Free-riding problem

Music as a club/toll good (Buchanan 1965) When introducing a price mechanism think of a toll road a club good becomes excludable in consumption, but it is still non-rival. All music events with an access system e.g. concerts and opera houses as well as music festivals can therefore be defined as club/toll goods. The ticket price makes them excludable in consumption, but listening to the performances is still non-rival. In a concert, an individual appropriates the entire benefit from listening to the music despite the presence of other music lovers.

Music as an information good (Shapiro & Varian 1998) Originally, music was a public good (e.g. as music in the liturgy and as a public court entertainment). In the 18 th century impresarios turned music into a club good by staging operas and concerts and collecting entrance fees. Music printing and later sound recording transformed music into a private good with a price mechanism constituting excludability and rivalry in consumption. Commercial broadcasting turned music into a public good financed by either commercials (private radio) or fees (public radio) In the course of digitization, the public good characteristics of music became even more relevant => P2P file-sharing.

How to solve the public good s problem with music? 1. Broadcasting business model: ad-supported and/or public fees 2. Record business model: privatization of consumption 3. Subscription-based music streaming: club/toll good

The challenges of the music streaming business model

Who benefits from music streaming? The artists?

The split of a monthly premium subscription of EUR 9.99 of a music streaming service in France Subscriber pays EUR 9.99 EUR 2.08 (20,8%) remain with Spotify EUR 1.67 (16.7%) go to the tax authority EUR 5.24 are channelled to the record labels for further distribution. They pocket EUR 4.56 (45.5%) EUR 1.00 (10%) are channelled to the collecting societies for for distribution to composers, authors and publishers EUR 0.68 (6.8%) are distributed to all performers for their music streamed Source: SNEP-Ernst & Young study, February 2015

Who benefits from music streaming? The artists? Answer: not really

Who benefits from music streaming? The streaming services?

in 1,000 EUR Spotify s revenue and cost of revenue, 2012-2016 3.500.000 3.000.000 2.500.000 2.000.000 1.500.000 1.000.000 500.000 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Subscriptions 374.600 677.890 978.565 1.744.393 2.638.493 Advertising 55.500 68.157 98.823 195.843 295.011 Cost of revenue 386.498 614.523 876.089 1.623.624 2.482.973

in 1,000 EUR Spotify s annual operating loss, 2012-2016 0-50.000-100.000-150.000-200.000-250.000-300.000-350.000-400.000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Operating loss -37.556-59.136-76.876-91.178-165.180-184.490-349.412

in 1,000 EUR Spotify s cost structure, 2012-2016 3.500.000 3.000.000 2.500.000 2.000.000 1.500.000 1.000.000 500.000 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 General and administrative 28.614 39.965 76.678 116.405 175.179 Sales and marketing 54.099 110.825 173.013 246.486 417.911 Research & development 37.946 72.723 121.030 143.307 206.853 Cost of revenue 386.498 614.523 876.089 1.623.624 2.482.973 Cost of revenue Research & development Sales and marketing General and administrative

SoudCloud s revenue and net loss, 2010-2015 30.000.000 20.000.000 10.000.000 0-10.000.000-20.000.000-30.000.000-40.000.000-50.000.000-60.000.000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Revenue 1.370.000 4.330.000 8.040.000 11.280.000 17.350.000 21.100.000 Net loss -1.550.000-4.460.000-12.430.000-23.110.000-39.140.000-51.220.000

Music streaming services that failed

Who benefits from music streaming? The streaming services? Answer: NO

Who benefits from music streaming? The recording companies?

Universal Music Group s revenue growth, 2015-2017 Source: Vivendi, First Half 2017 results, August 31, 2017, p.5.

Universal Music Group s first half year 2017 results Source: Vivendi, First Half 2017 results, August 31, 2017, p.25.

Source: Music Business Worldwide, Sony recorded music sales fall 6%, hampered by strength of Yen, April 28, 2017

Source: Music Business Worldwide, Warner Music just joined the $1bn streaming record company club, February 7, 2017

Key findings MERLIN s member survey 2017 Annual revenue distributions increased 52% to $353m. 64% of Merlin members report that audio streaming accounts for the majority of their digital revenues (2016: 46%). 67% of Merlin members stated that digital income accounted for over half their overall business revenues. 42% of members report that services such as YouTube account for less than 5% of their digital revenues

Who benefits from music streaming? The recording companies? Answer: YES, but just the majors and a few indies

in Euro Music streaming revenue of Austrian indie companies from digital music distributor Rebeat in 2013-2016 6.000.000 5.000.000 4.000.000 3.000.000 2.000.000 1.000.000 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 Streaming 274.067 458.955 564.877 5.214.375 Download 1.276.704 1.283.945 2.450.744 3.774.554

in Euro Music streaming revenue of indie companies in Austria from digital music distributor Rebeat in 2013 and 2016 160.000 140.000 120.000 100.000 80.000 60.000 40.000 20.000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Who benefits from music streaming? and of course the music consumers

The Economic Problem with Music And How Music Streaming Could Solve it Prof. Dr. Peter Tschmuck Department of Cultural Management and Gender Studies (IKM) University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna Anton-von-Webern-Platz 1 1030 Vienna, Austria Tel.: ++43-1-71155-3415 email: Tschmuck@mdw.ac.at webpage: http://musicbusinessresearch.wordpress.com/