Challenges of Launching DOCSIS 3.0 services. (Choice s experience) Installation and configuration

Similar documents
Broadband System - K

TROUBLESHOOTING DIGITALLY MODULATED SIGNALS, PART 2 By RON HRANAC

WHITE PAPER. Comprehensive Node Analysis Assures Big Upstream Gains For DOCSIS 3.0 Channel Bonding

Model GS Port Node 1 GHz with 65/86 MHz split

Impacts on Cable HFC Networks

Crossing the. Diplex Chasm. to 85 MHz. Author: Todd Gingrass Cable & Media Solutions

FORWARD PATH TRANSMITTERS

Prisma D-PON System 1550 nm Downstream Transmitter and EDFA

This presentation will give you a general idea of the subjects on the 18 CATV-HFC seminars that are available from:

High Density Optical Platform for FTTx and HFC

Cisco GS7000 High-Output 4-Way Segmentable Node with 42/54 Split

OPTICAL DISTRIBUTION STATION -

Cisco GS7000 High-Output (GaN) 4-Way Segmentable Node with 85/102 MHz Split

Prisma D-PON System ONT and Upstream Receiver

CHP Max Headend Optics Platform CHP CORWave II

DROP HARDENING. January 21, 2015

OmniStar GX2 Headend Optics Platform

THE FUTURE OF NARROWCAST INSERTION. White Paper

The 1.2 GHz NCI solution from Technetix:

Table of Contents. Headend Optical Transport OmniStar Enhanced DFB Laser [AM-OMNI-ALM-*] file:////ncs-server-xp/temp/motorola CD 2001/frames.

OmniStar GX2 Headend Optics Platform

Opti Max Nodes Digital Return System

Review of the Comcast. Fort Collins Cable System. Technical Characteristics

MEASUREMENT- BASED EOL STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS AND DOCSIS 3.1 SPECTRAL GAIN AYHAM AL- BANNA, DAVID BOWLER, XINFA MA

White Paper. Performance analysis: DOCSIS 3.1 cable TV headend combining systems

Cisco Prisma II 1310 nm, High-Density Transmitter and Host Module for 1.2 GHz Operation

WDM Video Overlays on EFM Access Networks

Hands-On Real Time HD and 3D IPTV Encoding and Distribution over RF and Optical Fiber

OPTILAB CATALOG TRANSMITTER OPTICAL NODE MINI-NODE EDFA PASSIVE OPTICS RECEIVER

Cisco GS MHz 4-Way Segmentable Node

CABLE TV on fiber. CABLE TV FIBERLINK Pass 100+ TV channels on 1 SingleMode fiber with no need for amps

OMNISTAR GX2. GX2-LM1000E Series 1310 nm Broadcast Transmitter DATA SHEET BENEFITS. 1 GHz bandwidth

OmniStar GX2 Headend Optics Platform GX2 LM1000E Series

Advanced Return Path Alignment & Maintenance Using the 9581 SST R4

2015 OPTICAL TRANSMITTERS

DOCSIS 3.1 Full channel loading Maximizing data throughput

DOCSIS 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business

REGIONAL NETWORKS FOR BROADBAND CABLE TELEVISION OPERATIONS

RLT 1550 d10. DWDM High Power, Ultra Wide Band CATV & SAT MHz Laser Optical Transmitter, with pre-correction, LAN remote control and alarms

TranScend Opto-Stacker & Destacker. Operation Manual

Cost Effective High Split Ratios for EPON. Hal Roberts, Mike Rude, Jeff Solum July, 2001

Opti Max4100. Opti Max. 1GHz Segmentable Nodes. Features. Broadband Access. 1GHz technology. Future 85/105MHz architecture support

99 Washington Street Melrose, MA Fax TestEquipmentDepot.com OPERATION MANUAL. The Best Thing on Cable

! "#$ ' % & % & ' ( )!' *!+, ( *-"(! './ 0 / 0/ $ 1/ 2$3 1

DOCSIS 3.1 roll Out First Lessons Learned DOCSIS 3.1 roll Out First Lessons Learned

Headend Systems. Series 9900 RF Signal Manager Modules. Introduction. Description

OmniStar GX2 Headend Optics Platform

MIGRATION TO FULL DIGITAL CHANNEL LOADING ON A CABLE SYSTEM. Marc Ryba Motorola Broadband Communications Sector

Description. Features MODEL ODN2P OPTICAL DISTRIBUTION NODE WITH TWO AMPLIFIED RF PORTS LIGHT LINK SERIES 2.

CPON-HFC. Customer Premises Optical Node for FTTH networks. About the Product

ESTIMATING DOWNSTREAM PERFORMANCE AND DOCSIS 3.1 CAPACITY IN CAA AND DAA SYSTEMS

1/31/2009. Technical highlights session PRODUCTS & SERVICES Summary. Sam Tagliavore PBN-FTTX

Juniper Networks G10 CMTS

FOGGY DOCSIS AN ENABLENCE ARTICLE WRITTEN BY JIM FARMER, CTO APRIL,

JDSU DSAM-2000 XT Specs Provided by DSAM Digital Services Analysis Meter

MODULO - HFC YOUR SMART HFC HEADEND TOOLKIT UNIVERSAL, SMART AND EASY - DON T MISS IT THE ART OF ENGINEERING

H5000 Outdoor Mini Virtual HUB

Catv Expert

Viavi ONX Ingress Mitigation and Troubleshooting Field Use Case using Ingress Expert

FCC Required Technical Standards for Analog & Digital Signals

HRF-xRx RETURN PATH HEADEND SIGNAL ORGANIZATION

Headend Optics Platform (CH3000)

860 DSPi Multifunction Digital Analyzer

DOCSIS 3.1 Operational Integration and Proactive Network Maintenance Tools

innovative technology to keep you a step ahead 24/7 Monitoring Detects Problems Early by Automatically Scanning Levels and other Key Parameters

Key Performance Metrics: Energy Efficiency & Functional Density of CMTS, CCAP, and Time Server Equipment

PROFESSIONAL DWDM OPTICAL LASER TRANSMITTER for HFC & FTTH LARGE CATV & SAT MHz DISTRIBUTIONS

XCOM1002JE (8602JE) Optical Receiver Manual


DS2460Q QAM Analysis Meter

Knovative Where Knowledge Drives Innovation

Surge-Gap Drop Amplifier 1 GHz with 42/54 MHz Split

DSAM Digital Services Analysis Meter

Obtain Power Measurements of a DOCSIS Downstream Signal Using a Spectrum Analyzer

NEWS. What s the difference between Cable and DSL broadband access? Part 1

Digital Video Engineering Professional Certification Competencies

Symmetrical Services Over HFC Networks. White Paper

TriAccess Solutions. Advanced CATV & High-Speed Data

Performance Broadband Innovation

Model 755U Optical Transmitter DWDM, up to 20 km, Low Distortion, Wideband

TRFM Series RF Amplifier Module

SYSTEM DESIGN - NEXT GENERATION HFC

ACTIVE IF SPLITTER/COMBINER UHP-IFS

Optical Receiver Manual. Transmitter OP-OR212JSE. Shenzhen Optostar Optoelectronics Co., Ltd (Version 2)

SERIES J: CABLE NETWORKS AND TRANSMISSION OF TELEVISION, SOUND PROGRAMME AND OTHER MULTIMEDIA SIGNALS Digital transmission of television signals

innovative technology to keep you a step ahead Tailored to Simplify Installation and Troubleshooting of RF Signals

Compact EGC Fiber Deep Nodes A90100 and A90300

TCF: Hybrid fibre coax systems Online course specification

L-Band Fiber Optic Links

Broadband System - D

New DSP Family CM Sweep Feature

ENGINEERING COMMITTEE Interface Practices Subcommittee AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD ANSI/SCTE

JDSU DSAM-6000A Specs Provided by DSAM-6000 Digital Service Analysis Meter

PRODUCT OVERVIEW OPTICAL NODES

Radio Frequency over Glass. Passive Optical Network (PON) for EuroDOCSIS infrastructures

R&S SFD DOCSIS Signal Generator Signal generator for DOCSIS 3.1 downstream and upstream

Optical Communications Mainframe - Laser Transmitter Module

ENGINEERING COMMITTEE

Cisco Model DPC3000 DOCSIS 3.0 Cable Modem

DOCSIS SET-TOP GATEWAY (DSG): NEXT GENERATION DIGITAL VIDEO OUT-OF-BAND TRANSPORT

Transcription:

(Choice s experience) Installation and configuration

(cont.) (Choice s experience) DOCSIS 3.0 Components M-CMTS deployment DTI Server Edge QAM Modular CMTS I-CMTS Integrated CMTS Integrated DOCSIS 3.0 QAMs

(cont.) (Choice s experience) DTI Server What is a DTI server? DTI (DOCSIS Timing Interface) synchronizes DOCSIS capable devices that do not share a common clock. Why is synchronization important? DOCSIS devices rely on timing to know when to listen for the data that is important to them. DOCSIS is a synchronous transport medium.

(cont.) (Choice s experience) Edge QAM What is an Edge QAM? It converts IP based services to Digital QAM signaling Why do we need to convert IP to a Digital QAM? This was a way that some CMTS vendors made their equipment more capable of handling additional downstream ports on their CMTS. Additional ports could be added to the CMTS without utilizing a lot of space on the existing unit or replacing the current cards.

CMTS (cont.) (Choice s experience) Modular vs Integrated Modular Pros Allows use of existing equipment Can use external QAM for multiple CMTSs or services. Cons Requires external time source Requires additional cabling and combining work in the head-end Integrated Pros Doesn t require external time source No additional headend wiring required Cons Fork lift upgrade of line cards

Legacy Network topology (cont.) (Choice s experience)

(cont.) (Choice s experience) Legacy Plant Topology - Current

(cont.) (Choice s experience) M-CMTS Downstream Channel bonding Network topology

(cont.) (Choice s experience) E-QAM Channels Integrated Channels

(cont.) (Choice s experience) Things to watch out for: Multiple QAMS per port mean less max RF-Power available for forward channels. Very important E-QAMS and CMTS synchronize their timing. No RF-Switch redundancy on E-QAMS. Keep an eye on CMTS CPU and memory, utilization of both increases as channels are added. Don t forget about CMTS and site WAN connectivity, could outgrow it real quick. Additional points of failure introduced when going the modular route, plan for as much redundancy as possible on external gear (DTI, E-QAMs, power-cpu, ethernet).

Questions???

(Choice s experience) Head-end Installation and configuration

Forward balancing To ensure a reliable service, forward path must comply to a set of specifications based on manufacturers technical sheets, desired signal inputs to actives, etc. When working with optical lasers you don t want to under drive (signal too low) or overdrive (too much signal) the optics inside the equipment. Manufacturer s specifications must be followed to eliminate Optical Modulation Index (OMI) errors, problems with MER and BER, Automatic Gain Control (AGC) failures, etc.

Forward balancing (based on a specific manufacturer) Example: 64 EIA QAM channels, 3 analog carriers Since each 4 digital channels = 1 NTSC analog: 64/4 = 16 Adding the three analog carriers: 16+3 = 19 NTSC analog loading. Following the manufacturer s specifications: 10 log (ratio of channels)

Forward balancing Example: As per manufacturers specifications 79 channel must be used to found the ratio of the channels. 10 log (19/79) = -6.2 What this means is that in the broadcast port of the laser we must enter 6 dbmv above manufacturer s specs. All analogs should read 21 dbmv on the broadcast input and digital channels must be 6dBc below analogs for 256 QAM.

DOCSIS 3.0 Edge QAM addition impact on laser power input Adding new QAMs for channel bonding poses a challenge to already working forward path. Why? 1. First, new combining was added to accommodate for the new QAM channels. This added new losses. 2. Second, there is a difference between broadcasting and narrowcasting and how the forward laser process them. For Choice Cable a requirement on the forward lasers had to be met so that DOCSIS QAMs power were at proper levels and proper signal was received on the optical node.

DOCSIS 3.0 Edge QAM additional impact on laser power input In our system we have two different models of forward lasers, one requires a higher broadcast/narrowcast separation (22dB), while the other one only needs 6dB separation. Due to the fact that new DOCSIS QAM channels were added to the system to deploy new services we had to rebalance the entire forward path.

DOCSIS 3.0 Edge QAM addition impact on laser power input Solutions: 1. To solve our problem we divided most of the service groups which contained the model with larger separation between narrowcast and broadcast lasers in smaller groups. 2. Compensated loss by replacing 8-ways for 4-ways, etc. 3. As a way of preventing MER and BER issues fiber optic connectors were cleaned for the TX and RX.

Return balancing In order to optimize the entire return path not only the field has to be balance, but also the head-end must establish its X level. Almost all the CPEs being deployed today offer some type of two way communication and as such we must ensure that the link between the customer and the head-end happens. Return path is a bit more difficult to handle than forward because of all the impairments that can happen between a customer s drop and the head-end. Loose connectors, electrical lamps, welding shops and other day to day use of electronics can cause service interruptions in the return path. Good return balancing combine with proper plant maintenance can overcome many of these issues.

Return balancing We balanced our returns the following way: Generate a CW carrier from the node. Use return s input test point. In the head-end, measure the amplitude of this CW carrier at the input of the CMTS. By doing it this way we eliminate the confusion of the plenty of test points in the head-end. We also have a more accurate reading on the amount of power into the CMTS.

Questions?????????

Network Considerations Node Alignment. Forward and Return Sweep. Achieving best NPR results on your return TX. FP V.S DFB Lasers (return transmitters). Have an aggressive CLI program. Begin to look at CWE (Code Word Error) or upstream bit error rate. Consider eliminating 26 value taps in order to meet maximum transmit power levels.

Return balancing We balanced our returns the following way: 1. Generate a CW carrier from the node. Use return s input test point. 2. Ensure you are receiving the appropriate light levels at the return receiver. 3. Verify proper output RF levels on output of receivers. 4. By way of using passive devices pad accordingly to reach CMTS with proper RF level. 5. At the input of the CMTS port, measure the amplitude of this CW carrier, it must be 0 dbmv. By doing it this way we eliminate the confusion of many test points in the head-end.

Hub RX Output Level NODE 3 RX Return RX TX 8-Way Splitter The Hub RX output is, by design, =19 dbmv (at the 8-way splitter port) in this example. This level has already been set-up (when optical link was set-up.) -8 db 0 dbmv CMTS

Balancing Amplifiers - Forward Sweep Balancing amplifiers using tilt only Headend Lose Face Plate, or crack cable shield No Termination D = 492*V p /F F Node Reference Signal Sweep response with a Resonant Frequency Absorption Sweep response with standing waves

NPR (db) Challenges of Launching DOCSIS 3.0 services Achieving best NPR results. 55 50 Linear Response Standard DFB & FP TX Noise Power Ratio (NPR) Performance with 7 db Optical Link Non-Linear Response (Clipping) 45 38 db CNR Carrier- to- Noise* 40 35 30 25 Room Temp Std DFB Room Temp Std FP 20-70 -65-60 -55-50 -45-40 -35-30 -25-20 -15 Input Power per Hz (dbmv/hz) Total RF Input Power

Installation, drop configuration and channel testing.

Verifying signal levels at the tap. Making sure you establish channel bonding from the beginning. The importance of good installation practices. Configuring signal distribution inside the Customer s Home. Digital measurements at the CPE. Finding the ideal transmit level for a cable Modem.

Verifying signal and TX levels at the tap and CPE. RDI=19dB 23 44/34 db/m V Tap TX Level = 42 21/11 db/m V Tap TX Level = 41 20 Tap TX Level = 39 Tap TX Level = 36 Tap TX Level = 35 17 14 11 Tap TX Level = 34 8 TapTX Level = 31 4-7 db -7 db -7 db -7 db -7 db -7 db -7 db Home TX Lvl = 49 Home TX Lvl = 48 Home TX Lvl= 46 Home TX Lvl = 43 Home TX Lvl = 42 Home TX Lvl = 41 Home TX Lvl = 38 Cable Modem Cable Modem Cable Modem Cable Modem Cable Modem Cable Modem Cable Modem

Making sure you establish channel bonding from the beginning. Installation Cable modem statistics Throughput

The importance of good installation practices. 1- Follow proper design, avoid cascading splitters. 2- If using house amplifiers be aware of return loss. 3- Ensure all connectors are properly tightened. 4- Test for signal leakage. 5- Verify signal levels. 6- Complete home certification.

The real issue is drop noise (noise coming from the subscriber premise). The subscriber drop typically generates the greatest amount of noise in the HFC plant. Poorly made F-connectors, loose fittings, electrical interference coming from unshielded 75ohms connectors behind TV sets, unauthorized activity, etc. Addressing subscriber originated noise is the quickest and surest way to improve the overall Node health on your network. Ensure you have a well organize CLI program.

The BAD news is that ingress from one home can potentially kill upstream services for hundreds of your subscribers!!!

Questions?????????