RCBD with Sampling Pooling Experimental and Sampling Error

Similar documents
RANDOMIZED COMPLETE BLOCK DESIGN (RCBD) Probably the most used and useful of the experimental designs.

Block Block Block

Model II ANOVA: Variance Components

GLM Example: One-Way Analysis of Covariance

Replicated Latin Square and Crossover Designs

Problem Points Score USE YOUR TIME WISELY USE CLOSEST DF AVAILABLE IN TABLE SHOW YOUR WORK TO RECEIVE PARTIAL CREDIT

Statistical Consulting Topics. RCBD with a covariate

Latin Square Design. Design of Experiments - Montgomery Section 4-2

PROC GLM AND PROC MIXED CODES FOR TREND ANALYSES FOR ROW-COLUMN DESIGNED EXPERIMENTS

Moving on from MSTAT. March The University of Reading Statistical Services Centre Biometrics Advisory and Support Service to DFID

Paired plot designs experience and recommendations for in field product evaluation at Syngenta

1'-tq/? BU-- _-M August 2000 Technical Report Series of the Department of Biometrics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Linear mixed models and when implied assumptions not appropriate

Do delay tactics affect silking date and yield of maize inbreds? Stephen Zimmerman Creative Component November 2015

Modelling Intervention Effects in Clustered Randomized Pretest/Posttest Studies. Ed Stanek

Subject-specific observed profiles of change from baseline vs week trt=10000u

MANOVA COM 631/731 Spring 2017 M. DANIELS. From Jeffres & Neuendorf (2015) Film and TV Usage National Survey

Mixed Effects Models Yan Wang, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT

MANOVA/MANCOVA Paul and Kaila

Resampling Statistics. Conventional Statistics. Resampling Statistics

I. Model. Q29a. I love the options at my fingertips today, watching videos on my phone, texting, and streaming films. Main Effect X1: Gender

COMP Test on Psychology 320 Check on Mastery of Prerequisites

Mixed Models Lecture Notes By Dr. Hanford page 151 More Statistics& SAS Tutorial at Type 3 Tests of Fixed Effects

TWO-FACTOR ANOVA Kim Neuendorf 4/9/18 COM 631/731 I. MODEL

Objective Video Quality Assessment of Direct Recording and Datavideo HDR-40 Recording System

Mixed models in R using the lme4 package Part 2: Longitudinal data, modeling interactions

Supplementary Figures Supplementary Figure 1 Comparison of among-replicate variance in invasion dynamics

Exercises. ASReml Tutorial: B4 Bivariate Analysis p. 55

subplots (30-m by 33-m) without space between potential subplots. Depending on the size of the

Repeated measures ANOVA

8 Nonparametric test. Question 1: Are (expected) value of x and y the same?

1. Model. Discriminant Analysis COM 631. Spring Devin Kelly. Dataset: Film and TV Usage National Survey 2015 (Jeffres & Neuendorf) Q23a. Q23b.

Forage Test Results. Wheat Forage. Tifton, Georgia: Wheat Forage Performance,

Master's thesis FACULTY OF SCIENCES Master of Statistics

Sociology 7704: Regression Models for Categorical Data Instructor: Natasha Sarkisian

TI-Inspire manual 1. Real old version. This version works well but is not as convenient entering letter

How to present your paper in correct APA style

Analysis of Packet Loss for Compressed Video: Does Burst-Length Matter?

Discriminant Analysis. DFs

On the Effects of Teacher s Sense of Humor on Iranian s EFL Learners Reading Comprehension Ability

UPDATED STANDARDIZED CATCH RATES OF BLUEFIN TUNA (THUNNUS THYNNUS) FROM THE TRAP FISHERY IN TUNISIA

Effect of sense of Humour on Positive Capacities: An Empirical Inquiry into Psychological Aspects

Reliability. What We Will Cover. What Is It? An estimate of the consistency of a test score.

Aesthetic vs. efferent reading in reading comprehension courses in the Iranian EFL context

TITLE OF PROJECT: 2004 Processing Pea Cultivar Evaluation

The Effect of Using Humor on High School Students Grammar Performance and Motivation

Digital Delay / Pulse Generator DG535 Digital delay and pulse generator (4-channel)

LAUGHTER YOGA IS THE BEST MEDICINE

Prospects for managing Sclerotinia head rot with fungicides LESSONS FROM FIELD TRIALS CONDUCTED IN 2011

Oat Forage. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Forage Performance, Dry Matter Yield

Chapter 27. Inferences for Regression. Remembering Regression. An Example: Body Fat and Waist Size. Remembering Regression (cont.)

Tutorial 0: Uncertainty in Power and Sample Size Estimation. Acknowledgements:

SECTION I. THE MODEL. Discriminant Analysis Presentation~ REVISION Marcy Saxton and Jenn Stoneking DF1 DF2 DF3

Brief Report. Development of a Measure of Humour Appreciation. Maria P. Y. Chik 1 Department of Education Studies Hong Kong Baptist University

DV: Liking Cartoon Comedy

CONCLUSION The annual increase for optical scanner cost may be due partly to inflation and partly to special demands by the State.

a user's guide to Probit Or LOgit analysis

Predicting the Importance of Current Papers

More About Regression

Visible Vibrations (originally Chladni Patterns) - Adding Memory Buttons. Joshua Gutwill. August 2002

Student Guide to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association Vol. 5

Technical report on validation of error models for n.

in the Howard County Public School System and Rocketship Education

Handout #5. Introduction to the Design of Experiments (DOX) (Reading: FCDAE, Chapter 1~3)

Student Guide to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association Vol. 5

Sociology 704: Topics in Multivariate Statistics Instructor: Natasha Sarkisian

A STATISTICAL VIEW ON THE EXPRESSIVE TIMING OF PIANO ROLLED CHORDS

STAT 113: Statistics and Society Ellen Gundlach, Purdue University. (Chapters refer to Moore and Notz, Statistics: Concepts and Controversies, 8e)

Best Pat-Tricks on Model Diagnostics What are they? Why use them? What good do they do?

Bootstrap Methods in Regression Questions Have you had a chance to try any of this? Any of the review questions?

The Effects of Web Site Aesthetics and Shopping Task on Consumer Online Purchasing Behavior

K-Pop Idol Industry Minhyung Lee

%CHCKFRQS A Macro Application for Generating Frequencies for QC and Simple Reports

Let s randomize your treatment (draw plot #s)

Integrated Impact Indicators (I3) compared with Impact Factors (IFs): An alternative research design with policy implications

II. SYSTEM MODEL In a single cell, an access point and multiple wireless terminals are located. We only consider the downlink

Open access press vs traditional university presses on Amazon

JESK. The Effect of Text Information Frame Ratio and Font Size on the Text Readability of Circle Smartwatch. 1. Introduction

Friday 5 June 2015 Morning

Effect of room acoustic conditions on masking efficiency

(Week 13) A05. Data Analysis Methods for CRM. Electronic Commerce Marketing

GENOTYPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DIFFERENCES IN FIBRE DIAMETER PROFILE CHARACTERISTICS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH STAPLE STRENGTH IN MERINO SHEEP

Estimating the Time to Reach a Target Frequency in Singing

PART FOUR. Polyalphabetic Substitution Systems PERIODIC POLYALPHABETIC SUBSTITUTION SYSTEMS

The Proportion of NUC Pre-56 Titles Represented in OCLC WorldCat

THE RELATIONSHIP OF BURR HEIGHT AND BLANKING FORCE WITH CLEARANCE IN THE BLANKING PROCESS OF AA5754 ALUMINIUM ALLOY

Google Scholar and ISI WoS Author metrics within Earth Sciences subjects. Susanne Mikki Bergen University Library

PERFORMANCE OF 10- AND 20-TARGET MSE CLASSIFIERS 1

Programs. onevent("can", "mousedown", function(event) { var x = event.x; var y = event.y; circle( x, y, 10 ); });

Mesotrione: Program for Bentgrass Removal and Overseeding (Fall Timing)

Effect of Compact Disc Materials on Listeners Song Liking

Story Tracking in Video News Broadcasts. Ph.D. Dissertation Jedrzej Miadowicz June 4, 2004

Modeling television viewership

EECS 270 Midterm 2 Exam Closed book portion Fall 2014

hprints , version 1-1 Oct 2008

CURRENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

Master thesis. The effects of L2, L1 dubbing and L1 subtitling on the effectiveness of persuasive fictional narratives.

The effect of exposure and expertise on timing judgments in music: Preliminary results*

Intra-frame JPEG-2000 vs. Inter-frame Compression Comparison: The benefits and trade-offs for very high quality, high resolution sequences

Priming Attitudes toward Feng Shui

Transcription:

RCBD with Sampling Pooling Experimental and Sampling Error As we had with the CRD with sampling, we will have a source of variation for sampling error. Calculation of the Experimental Error df is done the same way as if there was no sampling. Calculation of the Sampling Error df is done the same way as was done for the CRD with sampling. We will test the homogeneity of variance between the Experimental Error MS and the Sampling Error MS. If they are homogeneous a Pooled Error MS can be calculated and used as the denominator of the F-test on treatments. ANOVA Table Example SOV Df F Rep r-1 Rep MS/Pooled Error MS Trt t-1 Trt MS/Pooled Error MS Experimental Error (r-1)(t-1) Sampling Error (rts-1)-(tr-1) Total trs-1 Pooled Error MS Exp Error df + Sampling Error df Treatment Rep Sample A B C 1 1 78 68 89 1 8 64 87 Y 11. =160 Y 1. =13 Y 31. =176 Y.1. =468 1 74 6 88 78 66 9 Y 1. =15 Y. =18 Y 3. =180 Y.. =460 3 1 80 70 90 3 84 60 96 Y 13. =164 Y 3. =130 Y 33. =186 Y.3. =480 Y i.. 476 390 54 Y = 1408

Step 1. Calculate the Correction Factor (CF). Y... rts = 1408 3(3)() = 110,136.889 Step. Calculate the Total SS: Total SS = Y ijk CF = ( 78 + 8 + 74 +... + 96 ) = 11.111 Step 3. Calculate the Replicate SS. CF Rep SS Y = ts. j. CF 468 = 3() 460 + 3() 480 + 3() CF = 33.778 Step 4. Calculate the Treatment SS: Treatment SS Y = rs i.. CF 476 = 3() 390 + 3() 54 + 3() CF = 1936.444

Step 5. Calculate the SS Among Experimental Units Total (SSAEUT) SS AEUT Y = s ij. CF 160 = 15 + 164 + 186 +... + CF = 003.111 Step 6. Calculate the Experimental Error SS: Experimental Error SS = SAEUT SS TRT SS REP = 003.111 1936.444 33.778 = 3.889 Step 7. Calculate the Sampling Error SS: Sampling Error SS = Total SS SSAEUT = 11.111 003.111 = 118.0 Step 8. Complete the ANOVA Table: SOV Df SS MS F Rep r-1= 33.778 16.889.054 ns Trt t-1 = 1936.444 968. 117.76 ** Experimental Error (r-1)(t-1) = 4 3.889 8. Sampling Error (trs-1) - (tr-1) = 9 118.0 13.111 Total trs-1 = 17 11.111 Step 9. Test the homogeneity of variance between the Experimental and Sampling Error MS using the Folded F-test.

Step 9.1 Calculate the F-value using the Folded F-test F = 8. 13.111 = 0.67 Folded F = Sampling Error MS / Experimental Error MS Step 9. Look up the table F-value This F-test is a one-tail test because there is the expectation that the Experimental σ. Error MS ( σ + ) is going to be larger than the Sampling Error MS ( ) S sσ E Thus, if you are testing α = 0.01, then you need to use the F-table for α = 0.01 (Appendix Table IV, page 61). S = F ExptErrdf 0.01;4,9 = 6. 4 F 0.01,( )( SampErrdf ) Step 9.3 Make conclusions: Since the calculated value of F (0.67) is less than the Table-F value (6.4), we fail to reject H o : Sampling Error MS = Experimental Error MS at the 99% level of confidence. Therefore, we can calculate a Pooled Error MS Step 10: Calculate the Pooled Error df and the Pooled Error MS Pooled Error df = Sampling Error df + Experimental Error df = (9+4) = 13 Pooled Error MS = Sampling Error SS + Experimental Error SS Sampling Error df + Experimental Error df 118.0 + 3.889 = = 11. 607 4 + 9

Step 11: Complete the ANOVA using the Pooled Error MS as the denominator of the F- test SOV Df SS MS F Rep r-1= 33.778 16.889 1.455 ns Trt t-1 = 1936.444 968. 83.4 ** Experimental Error (r-1)(t-1) = 4 3.889 8. Sampling Error (trs-1) - (tr-1) = 9 118.0 13.111 Total trs-1 = 17 11.111 Pooled Error Expt Error df + Samp Error df=13 150.889 11.607 Step 1. Calculate LSD. LSD TRT = t.05 PooledErrorMS rs =.16 (11.607) 3* = 4.4 Step 13. Compare treatment means Treatment B A C Mean 65.0 a 79.3 b 90.3 c

SAS for the RCBD with Sampling Commands options pageno=1; data rcbdsamp; input TRT $ Rep Sample Yield; datalines; A 1 1 78 A 1 8 A 1 74 A 78 A 3 1 80 A 3 84 B 1 1 68 B 1 64 B 1 6 B 66 B 3 1 70 B 3 60 C 1 1 89 C 1 87 C 1 88 C 9 C 3 1 90 C 3 96 ;; proc anova; class rep trt; model yield=rep trt rep*trt; *comment rep*trt is the experimental error; test h=rep trt e=rep*trt; means trt/lsd e=rep*trt; title 'RCBD with Sampling - Using the Experimental Error as the Denominator of the F-test'; run; proc anova; class rep trt; model yield=rep trt; *comment by leaving out the rep*trt term, you are allowing SAS to calculate the pooled error; means trt/lsd; title 'RCBD with Sampling - Using the Pooled Error as the Denominator of the F-test'; run;

01:30 Wednesday, December 05, 007 7 RCBD with Sampling - Using the Pooled Error as the Denominator of the F-test Output Obs TRT Rep Sample Yield 1 A 1 1 78 A 1 8 3 A 1 74 4 A 78 5 A 3 1 80 6 A 3 84 7 B 1 1 68 8 B 1 64 9 B 1 6 10 B 66 11 B 3 1 70 1 B 3 60 13 C 1 1 89 14 C 1 87 15 C 1 88 16 C 9 17 C 3 1 90 18 C 3 96

RCBD with Sampling - Using the Experimental Error as the Denominator of the F-test The ANOVA Procedure 01:30 Wednesday, December 05, 007 8 Class Class Level Information Levels Values Rep 3 1 3 TRT 3A B C Number of Observations Read 18 Number of Observations Used 18

01:30 Wednesday, December 05, 007 9 RCBD with Sampling - Using the Experimental Error as the Denominator of the F-test The ANOVA Procedure Dependent Variable: Yield Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 8 003.111111 50.388889 19.10 <.0001 Error 9 118.000000 13.111111 Corrected Total 17 11.111111 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE Yield Mean 0.944369 4.6906 3.6097 78. Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F Rep 33.777778 16.888889 1.9 0.31 TRT 1936.444444 968. 73.85 <.0001 Rep*TRT 4 3.888889 8. 0.63 0.655 Tests of Hypotheses Using the Anova MS for Rep*TRT as an Error Term Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F Rep 33.777778 16.888889.05 0.434 TRT 1936.444444 968. 117.76 0.0003

RCBD with Sampling - Using the Experimental Error as the Denominator of the F-test The ANOVA Procedure t Tests (LSD) for Yield NoteThis test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the : experimentwise error rate. 01:30 Wednesday, December 05, 007 10 Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 4 Error Mean Square 8. Critical Value of t.77645 Least Significant Difference 4.5965 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N TRT A 90.333 6 C B 79.333 6 A C 65.000 6 B

RCBD with Sampling - Using the Pooled Error as the Denominator of the F-test The ANOVA Procedure 01:30 Wednesday, December 05, 007 11 Class Class Level Information Levels Values Rep 3 1 3 TRT 3A B C Number of Observations Read 18 Number of Observations Used 18

01:30 Wednesday, December 05, 007 1 RCBD with Sampling - Using the Pooled Error as the Denominator of the F-test The ANOVA Procedure Dependent Variable: Yield Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 4 1970. 49.555556 4.44 <.0001 Error 13 150.888889 11.606838 Corrected Total 17 11.111111 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE Yield Mean 0.98863 4.355388 3.406881 78. Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F Rep 33.777778 16.888889 1.46 0.690 TRT 1936.444444 968. 83.4 <.0001

RCBD with Sampling - Using the Pooled Error as the Denominator of the F-test Dependent Variable: Yield The ANOVA Procedure 01:30 Wednesday, December 05, 007 13 NoteThis test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the : experimentwise error rate. Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 13 Error Mean Square 11.60684 Critical Value of t.16037 Least Significant Difference 4.494 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N TRT A 90.333 6 C B 79.333 6 A C 65.000 6 B