PPM Rating Distortion. & Rating Bias Handbook

Similar documents
PPM Panels: A Guidebook for Arbitron Authorized Users

Editorial Policy. 1. Purpose and scope. 2. General submission rules

ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY

PUBLIC NOTICE MEDIA BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE VIDEO DESCRIPTION MARKETPLACE TO INFORM REPORT TO CONGRESS. MB Docket No.

Regulation No. 6 Peer Review

Metuchen Public Educational and Governmental (PEG) Television Station. Policies & Procedures

Collection Development

Policy & Procedures Manual

Put Your Market in the Race for National Buys

Broadcasting Authority of Ireland Guidelines in Respect of Coverage of Referenda

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:

Legal Memorandum. In this issue, link to information about. Developments: FCC Proposes New Video Description Rules. April 29, 2016

MEDIA CREDENTIAL APPLICATION

Publishing India Group

Policy & Procedures Manual

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES For Channel 17 Community Cable Television Programming Town of Sandown May, 2004 Revised July 10, 2017

A Statement of Ethics for Editors of Library and Information Science Journals

Instructions to Authors

ACCESS CHANNEL POLICY NORTH SUBURBAN COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 2019

Credits. Guidance Note. Status of Guidance Note. Key Editorial Standards. Issued: 11 April 2011

REACHING THE UN-REACHABLE

COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY

Rules and Procedures for 2016 Award Eligibility Theatrical Motion Pictures

Broadcasting Authority of Ireland Rule 27 Guidelines General Election Coverage

VFA Participation Agreement 2018 (Year 5)

LIBRARY COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY THE CONVENT OF THE SACRED HEART

LANGAUGE AND LITERATURE EUROPEAN LANDMARKS OF IDENTITY (ELI) GENERAL PRESENTATION OF ELI EDITORIAL POLICY

How to be an effective reviewer

Author Guidelines. Table of Contents

Catalogue no XIE. Television Broadcasting Industries

The fundamental purposes of the educational and public access channel are as follows:

Q Entercom National Cash Contest Rules

Akron-Summit County Public Library. Collection Development Policy. Approved December 13, 2018

LOW-BUDGET INDEPENDENT FEATURE FILM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM GUIDELINES FOR

Collection Development Policy

First-Time Electronic Data on Out-of-Home and Time-Shifted Television Viewing New Insights About Who, What and When

RULES & REGULATIONS FOR SUBMISSION

Privacy Policy. April 2018

Ethical Issues and Concerns in Publication of Scientific Outputs

Policy on the syndication of BBC on-demand content

ELIGIBLE INTERMITTENT RESOURCES PROTOCOL

Instructions for submitting Authors

and By Al Flapan KN4FA

2018 Golden Guitar Awards

Term Sheet Reflecting the Agreement of the ACCESS Committee Regarding In-Flight Entertainment November 21, 2016

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. Health Care Management Review Author Guide

Ethical Policy for the Journals of the London Mathematical Society

BUS TOUR AUDITION INFORMATION

Academic honesty. Bibliography. Citations

The App That Pays Contest CONTEST RULES

LAZER s Sing with Stone Sour Contest

Definitions. General Principles. Reviewed 08 August 2002

Information for authors

47 USC 534. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

STAR s Pick Your Purse

Acceptance of a paper for publication is based on the recommendations of two anonymous reviewers.

RULES AND REGULATIONS

Rules and Policies WRBB 104.9FM. Fall 2018 (Last Updated 5/2018)

Terms of Use and The Festival Rules

2016 ASSE Professional Development Conference

Media Comparisons 2012 Persons

93.3 KIOA s Gadget Grab

2018 AARWBA MEDIA CONTEST

Special Collections/University Archives Collection Development Policy

What You Need to Know About Addressing GDPR Data Subject Rights in Primo

Submission to Inquiry into subscription television broadcasting services in South Africa. From Cape Town TV

INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS

THE RYEDALE BOOK FESTIVAL SHORT STORY COMPETITION IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE BLACKTHORN PRESS

ACADEMY AWARDS GENERAL ENTRY CATEGORIES Guidelines and FAQ

Memorandum of Understanding. between. The Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management. and

EDITORIAL POLICY. Open Access and Copyright Policy

Guidelines for University Collaborative Partner Institutions: Use of the University logo

Independent TV: Content Regulation and the Communications Bill 2002

Journal of Japan Academy of Midwifery Instructions for Authors submitting English manuscripts

Original Research (not to exceed 3,000 words) Manuscripts describing original research should include the following sections:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND REPRODUCTION CONDITIONS

OPERATING GUIDELINES Cape Elizabeth Television Adopted April 10, 1989 (revised effective June 8, 2009.) Introduction

Collection Development Policy

Programming Policy. Policy Reviewed 2013 Scheduled review date 2016

Frequently Asked Questions

Canadian Journal of Urban Research Submission Guidelines Refereed Articles

Japan Library Association

London Public Library. Collection Development Policy

ALTERNATIVE BROADCAST INSPECTION PROGRAM

Thesis/Dissertation Preparation Guidelines

CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2015 GRADUATION BROADCAST AND VIDEO SERVICES QUOTE #Q15-005

Torture Journal: Journal on Rehabilitation of Torture Victims and Prevention of torture

43 rd Country Music Awards of Australia 2015 NOMINATION INFORMATION GUIDE TO SUBMITTING ENTRIES

Ethical Guidelines for Journals

CARNEGIE-STOUT PUBLIC LIBRARY MATERIALS SELECTION POLICY. City of Dubuque

American National Standard for Electric Lamps Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid-State Lighting Products

POV: Making Sense of Current Local TV Market Measurement

HOW TO WRITE HIGH QUALITY ARGUMENTS

Plan for Generic Information Collection Activity: Submission for. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

143 rd Annual Westminster Kennel Club All Breed Dog Show Monday-Tuesday, Feb , 2019 / Piers 92/94 and at Madison Square Garden

TV Translator Relocation Grant Program

Guest Editor Pack. Guest Editor Guidelines for Special Issues using the online submission system

TCTV Templeton Community Television

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM. TRIBUNE TELEVISION COMPANY (COMPANY) WXIN/WTTV (STATION) Indianapolis, IN (DESIGNATED MARKET AREA)

2008 CREDENTIAL MEMO

Transcription:

PPM Rating Distortion TM & Rating Bias Handbook Arbitron PPM Special Station Activities Guidelines for Radio Stations RSS-12-07880 4/12

Introduction The radio industry relies on radio ratings research for estimates of the size and composition of radio audiences. Station activities that undermine the credibility of this system of audience measurement have the potential to undermine both the perceived value of radio as an advertising medium and the credibility of radio as an honest, indispensable provider of information and entertainment. To help maintain the integrity of radio listener estimates, Arbitron has developed Special Station Activities guidelines in cooperation with radio broadcasters, advertisers, and other industry groups. These guidelines are intended to help radio broadcasters avoid activities that have the potential to bias survey participants or distort survey results. This handbook outlines Arbitron Special Station Activities guidelines and provides examples that radio broadcasters, advertisers, and other users of Arbitron s listener estimates may find helpful. The handbook does not attempt, however, to provide an exhaustive code of conduct. The creativity of radio broadcasters and the ever-changing nature of the radio industry prevent any handbook from providing an all-encompassing list of activities to be avoided. Rather, the handbook provides guidance to those seeking to preserve the value of listener estimates as a tool for decision making. 2

Preface Additional sources of information available to Arbitron subscribers include the Arbitron Radio Description of Methodology and the Rating Distortion/Rating Bias Policies and Procedures and associated notices available in each Arbitron PPM Radio Market Report. This latter source will reflect updates to the Special Station Activities guidelines in effect prior to report publication. Examples contained in this handbook are not all-inclusive, are illustrative only, and should not be construed as the absolute limits of the scope of Arbitron Special Station Activities guidelines or the determination Arbitron may make with regard to any particular event or set of circumstances. Arbitron may request the return of its encoding equipment from, or decline to publish audience estimates for, any station engaging in an activity that, in Arbitron opinion, may result in substantial Rating Distortion or Rating Bias. Pre-Reviews Arbitron recommends a confidential Pre-Review of station promotional activities as the single most effective means of avoiding activities with Rating Distortion or Rating Bias potential. 3

Rating Distortion Arbitron may consider as Rating Distortion any station activity that Arbitron believes may result in: The participation of PPM panel participants unauthorized by Arbitron; The provision of false information to Arbitron; A station learning the identity of PPM panel participants; A station gaining access to, or influence over, any Arbitron PPM (except as explicitly authorized by Arbitron); or The use of any Arbitron PPM or encoded signal for any purpose other than those intended by Arbitron. Types of Rating Distortion Rating Distortion activities may take several forms, including: Panelist Solicitation, Inauthentic Exposure to Encoded Media, Media Affiliation, and Unauthorized Use of Encoding Equipment. Panelist Solicitation Arbitron may consider as Rating Distortion any announcement, statement, or activity by a station in any medium that, by Arbitron judgment, may prompt any PPM panelist to: Identify his or her participation in the panel; Surrender control of his or her meter to a person other than that intended by Arbitron; or Provide false demographic or household information to Arbitron. Additionally, Arbitron may consider any attempt by a station to learn the identity of a PPM panelist as Rating Distortion regardless of whether the attempt results in the disclosure of any Arbitron research participant. An example of such an activity would include: Questions by stations on social networking sites or loyal listener email asking listeners whether they have participated in radio ratings research; or Questions on social networking sites or loyal listener email asking listeners whether they would be willing to carry a pager-sized device as part of a radio ratings research project. A station that learns the identity of any current or future Arbitron PPM panelist should notify Arbitron immediately. Inauthentic Exposure to Encoded Media Arbitron may consider as Rating Distortion any station activity that, by Arbitron judgment, may affect a panelist s behavior so that the media exposures captured by the panelist s meter differ from the panelist s exposure to encoded media. 4

Types of Rating Distortion (continued) Media Affiliation No employee of any of the following entities, or member of the employee s household, is eligible to participate in an Arbitron PPM panel: Radio station Television station Cable television station Broadcast network Cable television network Newspaper Magazine Advertising agency Participation in a PPM panel by an employee of a radio station will be considered Rating Distortion by the station with which the person is affiliated. If a station employee discovers that a household member has participated, or has agreed to participate in a PPM panel, Arbitron should be notified immediately. Unauthorized Use of Encoding Equipment Arbitron may consider the unauthorized use of encoding equipment or the unauthorized use of encoded audio as Rating Distortion. Unauthorized use may include, but is not limited to: The use of Arbitron encoding equipment by any station (including a co-owned station) other than the station for which the equipment was authorized by Arbitron; Double Encoding of a station s audio signal; or The use of a single encoder to encode nonsimulcast programming for example, the encoding of a station s nonsimulcast Internet stream with the code of the originating AM or FM station. Arbitron reserves the right to take whatever measures are necessary, in Arbitron opinion, to protect the integrity of Arbitron PPM audience estimates and data. 5

Rating Bias Arbitron may consider as Rating Bias any announcement, statement, or activity by a station that may: Differentially prompt a particular station s listeners to participate as Arbitron PPM panelists (relative to other stations listeners); or Differentially prompt PPM panelists who listen to a particular station to comply with Arbitron instructions (relative to panelists who listen to other stations). Examples of activities with Rating Bias potential would include: Encouragement by, or on behalf of, a station to listeners to participate as Arbitron PPM panelists; Messages to panelists by, or on behalf of, a station to carry their meters with them or download their listening information to Arbitron; or Messages delivered by a radio station, in any medium, alerting listeners that Arbitron PPM ratings research is, or soon will be, in progress or emphasizing the importance of participation in PPM ratings research. Note: References to success in Arbitron PPM ratings reports for prior report periods (subject to contractual agreement with Arbitron) are not treated as Rating Bias under these guidelines, provided that the references conform with all other elements of Arbitron Rating Distortion and Rating Bias guidelines. References to a station s performance in prior reports in the context of appeals for support, or accompanied by discussion of Arbitron PPM methodology, are not protected under these guidelines and may be treated by Arbitron as activities with Rating Bias potential. 6

Types of Rating Bias Activities with Rating Bias potential include those that may differentially sensitize one station s listeners to Arbitron methodology, PPM recruitment process, or PPM equipment relative to other stations listeners. Such activities may differentially prompt a particular station s listeners to participate as PPM panelists (relative to other stations listeners) or may differentially prompt panelists who listen to a particular station to comply with Arbitron s instructions (relative to panelists who listen to other stations). Promotion of Participation as Panelists Arbitron may consider as Rating Bias any activity, announcement, or statement, in any medium, by, or on behalf of, a station that, by Arbitron judgment, may differentially prompt the station s listeners to participate as PPM panelists. Examples of such activities include: Comments to the station s listeners describing Arbitron methodology or instruments; Announcements that PPM research is currently, or will soon be, in progress; or Discussions on-air, or on social networking sites to which listeners may be exposed, emphasizing the importance of participation in radio ratings research regardless of whether the names Arbitron or PPM are used. Encouragement to Comply With Arbitron Instructions Arbitron may consider as Rating Bias any activity, announcement, or statement, in any medium, by, or on behalf of, a station that by Arbitron judgment may be perceived by panelists as a prompt to comply with Arbitron instructions. Examples of such activities include: On-air discussions emphasizing that the station s success depends on PPM panelists carrying their meters; or Comments on a social networking site by station personnel reminding panelists to undock and carry their meters. 7

Applicable Media Arbitron Rating Distortion and Rating Bias guidelines apply to activities and comments by stations and their staff members in any medium to which listeners are likely to be exposed including newspapers, social networking sites, and other media that communicate via written words. Comments made by station personnel in social networking sites, for example, may be treated as Rating Distortion if the comments are likely to prompt current PPM panelists to disclose their participation regardless of whether the comments result in such a disclosure and regardless of whether the station personnel use pseudonyms. Rating Distortion/Rating Bias Violations Station activities with Rating Distortion or Rating Bias potential may result in responses from Arbitron that include but are not limited to: Special Notices Arbitron may place a special notice in applicable reports noting station activities with Rating Distortion or Rating Bias potential. Flags Audience estimates may be noted by a special symbol and special footnote in the PPM Analysis Tool SM and other Arbitron services. Below-the-Line Listing Stations that have engaged in activities with Rating Distortion or Rating Bias potential may be listed out of alphabetical sequence, below a special distinguishing line, in the PPM Radio Market Report (Arbitron ebook SM ). Delistment Arbitron may decline to publish audience estimates or data in all Arbitron services for any station that, by Arbitron judgment, has engaged in an activity with Rating Distortion or Rating Bias potential warranting delistment. Arbitron reserves the right to note activities with Rating Bias and Rating Distortion potential by any other means deemed appropriate by Arbitron judgment. Arbitron also reserves the right to utilize other forms of remedial action appropriate by Arbitron judgment. Requests for an Inquiry Requests from a station for Arbitron to conduct an inquiry into an activity by another station should be submitted to Arbitron in writing and accompanied by evidence, such as an aircheck recording, website screen shot, email advertisement, or newspaper clipping. Requests will be accepted through the last day of the applicable report period. The initiation of an inquiry is solely within the discretion of Arbitron. Arbitron will review activities conducted at any time (before, during, or after a report period) for compliance with the above guidelines if, by Arbitron judgment, the activity has the potential to undermine the integrity or perceived integrity of Arbitron audience estimates. 8

Additional Information The same activity could be subject to citation for two or more consecutive reports, depending on the timing and severity of the activity. Activities noted for one station may also be cited for additional stations on which the specific programming segment was also broadcast. Rating Distortion and Rating Bias activities noted in Arbitron reports may or may not have actually affected audience estimates. It is not possible to prove or disprove the effect of such activities, and Arbitron makes no attempt to do so. Activities with Rating Distortion or Rating Bias potential are nonetheless inherently detrimental to broadcasters, advertisers, and media researchers. That such activities may undermine confidence in audience estimates constitutes sufficient reason to notify report users of their occurrence. Arbitron reserves the right to use any available means to draw attention to any station activity that, in Arbitron opinion, has the potential to undermine the credibility of the survey, even though the activity does not meet any of the specific criteria outlined above. Arbitron further reserves the right to take other appropriate action, depending upon the content, context, frequency, or repetition of the activity. These guidelines are an effort to maintain the credibility of listener estimates and the integrity of the survey process. We believe a spirit of professionalism and ethical conduct by radio broadcasters will lead to active compliance with these guidelines. Contact Information Arbitron welcomes questions and comments on our PPM Rating Distortion and Rating Bias guidelines. Requests for inquiries into documented station activities, requests for confidential Pre-Reviews of planned station promotions, or questions or comments about our guidelines, may be addressed to: Dave Willinski Special Station Activities Committee Arbitron Inc. 9705 Patuxent Woods Drive Columbia, MD 21046-1572 Phone: (410) 312-8396 Fax: (410) 312-8626 Email: dave.willinski@arbitron.com PPM ratings are based on audience estimates and are the opinion of Arbitron and should not be relied on for precise accuracy or precise representativeness of a demographic or radio market. 24/7 Customer Service & Support (800) 543-7300 www.arbitrontraining.com www.arbitron.com Headquarters (410) 312-8000 Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles (888) 880-7810 New York (212) 887-1300 or (888) 880-7810 2012 Arbitron Inc. Arbitron PPM, Arbitron ebook SM, PPM TM, and PPM Analysis Tool SM are marks of Arbitron Inc. RSS-12-07880 9