SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRACTICE. LYNNE LIBERATO Haynes and Boone, LLP Houston, Texas

Similar documents
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Advantages of a Deposition

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

A Finding Aid to the Barbara Mathes Gallery Records Pertaining to Rio Nero Lawsuit, , in the Archives of American Art

KEEPING CONTROL AT DEPOSITION:

Illinois Official Reports

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

DEPOSITIONS. J. Alexander Tanford, 2001 I. PRELIMINARY MATTERS II. TAKING A DEPOSITION

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Fox 21, Inc. Deadline SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1

North Carolina Court of Appeals

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO Office of the Chief Justice DIRECTIVE CONCERNING COURT APPOINTMENTS OF DECISION-MAKERS PURSUANT TO , C.R.S.

An Advocate s Craft: Honing Your Technology Skills for Modern Litigation

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 1:10-cv LFG-RLP Document 1 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Ford v. Panasonic Corp

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Courtroom Evidence Presentation System

Case5:14-cv HRL Document1 Filed01/15/14 Page1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

dismiss? Most of my reading of case law involves Westlaw, which obviously

Case 3:16-cv K Document 36 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID 233

TRIAL TALK COLORADO TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION. October/November Years on the Side of People Volume 57 Issue 6

SHEPARD S CITATIONS. How to. Shepardize. Your guide to legal research using. Shepard s. Citations: in print. It s how you know

Patent Reissue. Devan Padmanabhan. Partner Dorsey & Whitney, LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/25/ :35 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/25/2017

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Breaks During Deposition Before Answering Pending Question (California)

J. Scott Colesanti SSRN Author #

P R O C E E D I N G S ; and the accompanying case on bond is Both sides ready to proceed? MS. TURNER: State's ready.

Regulation No. 6 Peer Review

Books for your desk, and your desktop. TexasBarBooks Catalog. FREE ground shipping 30-day money-back guarantee Additional licenses available

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI SHERWOOD DWAYNE BROWN. v. CAUSE NO CA SCT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE

United States Court of Appeals

Atticus Finch, Perry Mason and Michael Clayton Have Nothing on the Legal Profession s Favorite Attorney: Vinny

Court Filings 2000 Trial

Holding. The judgment in the second instance shall be reversed. This case shall be remanded to the Intellectual Property High Court.

Do's, Dont's, and Maybes: Legal Writing Punctuation Part I

DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL ORDER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY January 8, 2003 MERCER ISLAND POLICE

[3/24/2011] George Ross March 24, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT )))))))))))) Appeal No (Case No. 07-C-513 (E.D. Wis.

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

This Chapter does not apply to applications and decisions on, development on land reserved in corridor maps.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387

WINNING YOUR CASE THROUGH EFFECTIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE Defendant. /

FOR PUBLIC VIEWING ONLY INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387 DTV TRANSITION STATUS REPORT. All previous editions obsolete. transition. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

FALLS CABLE ACCESS CORPORATION CABLE ACCESS CHANNEL 14 Policies & Procedures Manual

Write the Cites Right Part I

REPORTER'S RECORD TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO DCV-0235-B

Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17

CELL TOWER VICTORIES by Michael Cherry, Edward J. Imwinkelried, Manfred Schenk, Aaron Romano, Naomi Fetterman, Nicole Hardin and Arnie Beckman.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Legality of Electronically Stored Images

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DIRECT EXAMINATION. Q. Go ahead and state and spell your name for the. A. Rick Chambers, R-I-C-K C-H-A-M-B-E-R-S.

Effective Use of Quotations By Angela Kershner, Legal Writing Fellow,

Ms. Finger ELA

Q. But in reality, the bond had already been. revoked, hadn't it? It was already set at zero bond. before September 21st, specifically on September --

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:08-cv DC Document Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 27 EXHIBIT A

Q. That's all from the OC spray, right? MR. SCOTT: Okay. Pass the. THE COURT: State? MR. SCOTT: Yes, Your Honor. State, call your next.

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 18 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Legal Research Refresher: Secondary Authority Guide

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL. - and - NOTICE OF MOTION (Motion for Leave to Appeal)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1980s Music: It Was More Than Disco Boogie There Was Just Something Subliminal About It. Jessica Malinski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Broken Arrow woman gets life sentence in shooting death

Case3:08-cv JW Document279-2 Filed07/02/12 Page1 of 10. Exhibit B

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Trademark Infringement: No Royalties for K-Tel's False Kingsmen

SELLE V. GIBB AND THE FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF PLAGIARISM. M. Fletcher Reynolds Copyright 1993

Leibowitz, et al. ORGANIZATION bill analysis 5/13/2009 (CSHB 821 by Hancock) Creating a TV manufacturer based TV recycling program

UNDERSTANDING TO ERADICATE HANDBOOK FOR UNDERSTANDING CORRUPTION CRIMES

BUS TOUR AUDITION INFORMATION

Araceli Cabral appeals the validity of the promotional examination for Financial Examiner 1 (PS8038L), Department of Banking and Insurance.

The NBCU Comcast Joint Venture

The NBCU-Comcast Joint Venture

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW ADVOCACY SPRING PROBLEM 2019 JOINT APPENDIX

LUVERNE PUBLIC ACCESS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Carl Lobitz. San Antonio Criminal Defense Lawyer. Recent Sampling of Criminal Case Results (Latest Results Near Bottom)

AMENDED MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE BRINGING OF A CLASS ACTION AND TO ASCRIBE THE STATUS OF REPRESENTATIVE (Art C.C.P.

Articles in the Source should aim to be under 5000 words (about 16 pages double-spaced) with or fewer footnotes, or only as needed.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY

1. At all relevant times, Richard S. McKirurey was the holder of North Carolina

Notification No: PSC/Exam/2017/44 Dated:

CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES CHART

Transcription:

SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRACTICE LYNNE LIBERATO Haynes and Boone, LLP Houston, Texas lynne.liberato@haynesboone.com To access the full materials please go to: http://www.haynesboone.com/summary_judgments_in_texas_2010/ State Bar of Texas 33 rd ANNUAL ADVANCED CIVIL TRIAL COURSE July 21-23, 2010 San Antonio August 25-27, 2010 Dallas October 20-22, 2010 Houston CHAPTER 7 See Judge David Hittner & Lynne Liberato, Summary Judgments in Texas: State and Federal Practice, 46 Hous. L. Rev. 1379 (2010). Available at www.houstonlawreview.org.

ARTICLE SUMMARY JUDGMENTS IN TEXAS: STATE AND FEDERAL PRACTICE * Judge David Hittner ** Lynne Liberato *** TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1384 PART 1: STATE SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRACTICE... 1386 I. PROCEDURE... 1386 A. Motion for Summary Judgment... 1387 1. General Requirements and Uses... 1387 2. Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment 1389 3. No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment 1390 4. Combined Traditional and No-Evidence Motions for Summary Judgment... 1392 B. Pleadings... 1393 1. Amended Pleadings... 1393 2. Unpleaded Claims or Defenses... 1395 3. Pleading Deficiencies and Special Exceptions 1396 C. Time for Filing Motion for Summary Judgment... 1399 * The Authors acknowledge and thank Bryon Allyn Rice, J.D., University of Houston Law Center, 2008; M.B.A., University of Iowa, 2001; and DeBra Edwards of Haynes and Boone, L.L.P, for their assistance in the preparation of this Article. ** United States District Judge, Southern District of Texas. Formerly Judge, 133d District Court of Texas, Houston, Texas; B.S., New York University, 1961; J.D., New York University School of Law, 1964. *** Partner, Haynes and Boone, L.L.P., Houston, Texas; B.S., Sam Houston State University, 1974; M.S., Texas A&M Commerce, 1977; J.D., South Texas College of Law, 1980; President, State Bar of Texas, 2000 2001.

1380 HOUSTON LAW REVIEW [46:5 1. Traditional Summary Judgment... 1399 2. No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment 1399 D. Deadlines for Filing Motion for Summary Judgment 1401 E. Deadlines for Response... 1403 F. Movant s Reply... 1405 G. Service... 1405 H. Continuances... 1408 1. General Principles... 1408 2. Factors Considered in Granting Continuances 1409 I. Hearing... 1411 J. The Judgment... 1413 K. Partial Summary Judgments... 1415 L. Motions for Rehearing... 1416 M. Sanctions... 1417 II. SUMMARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE... 1422 A. General Principles... 1422 1. Time for Filing... 1423 2. Unfiled Discovery... 1424 3. Objections to Evidence... 1425 4. Attach Evidence to Motion for/response to Summary Judgment... 1427 B. Pleadings as Evidence... 1428 C. Depositions... 1429 D. Answers to Interrogatories and Requests for Admissions... 1430 1. Evidentiary Considerations... 1430 2. Deemed Admissions... 1431 E. Documents... 1432 1. Attaching Documents to Summary Judgment Motion and Response... 1432 2. Evidentiary Considerations... 1433 3. Authentication of Documents... 1434 4. Copies... 1436 5. Judicial Notice of Court Records... 1436 F. Affidavits... 1437 1. Form of Affidavits... 1437 2. Substance of Affidavits... 1440 3. Effect of Improper Affidavits... 1441 4. Affidavits by Counsel... 1442

2010] SUMMARY JUDGMENTS IN TEXAS 1381 G. Other Evidence... 1443 H. Expert and Interested Witness Testimony... 1444 1. Expert Opinion Testimony... 1444 2. Nonexpert, Interested Witness Testimony... 1453 III. BURDEN OF PROOF FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTS. 1454 A. Traditional Summary Judgments... 1455 1. Defendant as Movant... 1455 2. Plaintiff as Movant on Affirmative Claims... 1456 3. Affirmative Defenses... 1457 4. Counterclaims... 1459 B. No-Evidence Summary Judgments... 1459 1. Reasonable Juror Test Applied to No-Evidence Summary Judgments... 1460 2. Historical Development... 1462 C. Both Parties as Movants... 1464 IV. RESPONDING TO AND OPPOSING A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT... 1465 A. Responding: General Principles... 1466 B. Responding to a Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment... 1467 C. Responding to a No-Evidence Summary Judgment Motion... 1468 D. Inadequate Responses... 1470 V. APPEALING SUMMARY JUDGMENTS... 1471 A. Exception: Both Parties File Motions for Summary Judgment... 1472 B. Exception: Government Immunity; Media Defendants... 1473 C. Exception: Permissive Appeal... 1474 D. Likelihood of Reversal... 1475 E. Finality of Judgment... 1475 F. Standard of Review... 1480 G. Appellate Record... 1483 H. Appellate Briefs... 1483 I. Judgment on Appeal... 1486 J. Bills of Review... 1487 VI. ATTORNEY S FEES... 1487 A. Fixed Percentage Fees... 1490 B. Reasonable Percentage Fees... 1490

1382 HOUSTON LAW REVIEW [46:5 VII. TYPES OF CASES AMENABLE TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT... 1491 A. Sworn Accounts... 1491 1. Requirements for Petition... 1492 2. Answer/Denial... 1493 3. Summary Judgment... 1494 B. Suits on Written Instruments... 1496 1. Application of the Parol Evidence Rule... 1498 2. Exception to the Parol Evidence Rule... 1498 C. Statute of Limitations/Statutes of Repose... 1499 D. Res Judicata/Collateral Estoppel... 1502 E. Equitable Actions... 1503 F. Medical Malpractice... 1504 1. Negation of Elements of Medical Malpractice 1504 2. Statute of Limitations... 1507 G. Defamation Actions... 1508 1. Applicable Law... 1509 2. Questions of Law... 1510 3. Plaintiff s Burden of Showing Actual Malice 1510 4. Qualified Privilege... 1511 H. Governmental Immunity... 1512 I. Family Law Cases... 1513 1. Enforceability of Premarital and Marital Property Agreements... 1513 2. Interpretation of Divorce Decrees... 1514 3. Interpretation or Application of Law... 1514 4. Res Judicata/Collateral Estoppel... 1515 5. Characterization of Property... 1515 6. Existence of the Marital Relationship... 1516 PART 2: FEDERAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRACTICE.. 1516 I. PROCEDURE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTS... 1516 A. Timing... 1517 B. Notice and Hearing... 1517 C. Deadline to Respond... 1519 D. Discovery... 1520 II. STANDARDS OF PROOF FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS... 1522 A. When the Movant Bears the Burden of Proof... 1522

2010] SUMMARY JUDGMENTS IN TEXAS 1383 B. When the Movant Does Not Bear the Burden of Proof... 1522 1. Movant s Initial Burden... 1522 2. Respondent s Burden... 1524 III. RESPONDING TO THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION... 1525 A. Supreme Court Precedent... 1525 B. Items in Response... 1528 IV. SUMMARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE... 1529 A. Declarations and Affidavits... 1529 B. Documents... 1530 C. Discovery Products... 1531 D. Pleadings... 1532 E. Expert Testimony... 1533 F. Objections to Evidence... 1537 V. RULE 12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS TREATED AS RULE 56 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. 1537 VI. APPEALING SUMMARY JUDGMENTS... 1539 A. When Summary Judgments Are Appealable... 1539 B. Standard of Review on Appeal... 1540 C. The District Court s Order on Summary Judgment 1542 CONCLUSION... 1543