Top-Up Experience at SPEAR3

Similar documents
SPEAR 3: Operations Update and Impact of Top-Off Injection

PEP II Design Outline

The Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation

Radiation Safety System for Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory*

LCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems

Advanced Photon Source - Upgrades and Improvements

Requirements for the Beam Abort Magnet and Dump

Status of SOLARIS Arkadiusz Kisiel

Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation

Status of Elettra, top-up and other upgrades

An Operational Diagnostic Complement for Positrons at CEBAF/JLab

TWO BUNCHES WITH NS-SEPARATION WITH LCLS*

North Damping Ring RF

Production of quasi-monochromatic MeV photon in a synchrotron radiation facility

P. Emma, et al. LCLS Operations Lectures

Report on the LCLS Injector Technical Review

Design Studies For The LCLS 120 Hz RF Gun Injector

30 GHz Power Production / Beam Line

Present Status and Future Upgrade of KEKB Injector Linac

PEP-II STATUS REPORT *

PEP II STATUS AND PLANS *

3 cerl. 3-1 cerl Overview. 3-2 High-brightness DC Photocathode Gun and Gun Test Beamline

LCLS Injector Technical Review

A Facility for Accelerator Physics and Test Beam Experiments

Status of RF Power and Acceleration of the MAX IV - LINAC

Summary of the 1 st Beam Line Review Meeting Injector ( )

New Filling Pattern for SLS-FEMTO

COMMISSIONING SCENARIOS FOR THE J-PARC ACCELERATOR COMPLEX

Operational Status of PF-Ring and PF-AR after the Earthquake

OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AT J-PARC

4.4 Injector Linear Accelerator

Characterizing Transverse Beam Dynamics at the APS Storage Ring Using a Dual-Sweep Streak Camera

FINAL DESIGN OF ILC RTML EXTRACTION LINE FOR SINGLE STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR

Hall-B Beamline Commissioning Plan for CLAS12

Recent APS Storage Ring Instrumentation Developments. Glenn Decker Advanced Photon Source Beam Diagnostics March 1, 2010

FIRST SIMULTANEOUS TOP-UP OPERATION OF THREE DIFFERENT RINGS IN KEK INJECTOR LINAC

2008 JINST 3 S LHC Machine THE CERN LARGE HADRON COLLIDER: ACCELERATOR AND EXPERIMENTS. Lyndon Evans 1 and Philip Bryant (editors) 2

The PEFP 20-MeV Proton Linear Accelerator

Upgrading LHC Luminosity

Diamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes

Tutorial: Trak design of an electron injector for a coupled-cavity linear accelerator

PEP II Status and Plans

An Overview of Beam Diagnostic and Control Systems for AREAL Linac

Spear3 RF System Sam Park 11/06/2003. Spear3 RF System. High Power Components Operation and Control. RF Requirement.

IOT OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE ON ALICE AND EMMA AT DARESBURY LABORATORY

The basic parameters of the pre-injector are listed in the Table below. 100 MeV

Program Risks Risk Analysis Fallback Plans for the. John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006

HIGH POWER BEAM DUMP AND TARGET / ACCELERATOR INTERFACE PROCEDURES *

Digital BPMs and Orbit Feedback Systems

RF Design of the LCLS Gun C.Limborg, Z.Li, L.Xiao, J.F. Schmerge, D.Dowell, S.Gierman, E.Bong, S.Gilevich February 9, 2005

Tolerances on Magnetic Misalignments in SESAME Storage Ring

Linac 4 Instrumentation K.Hanke CERN

Accelerator Systems of the TPS

CLEX (CLIC Experimental Area)

LHC Beam Instrumentation Further Discussion

ALBA. Libera Workshop 16 A. Olmos

PRESENT STATUS OF J-PARC

A Cathode Development Cornell Cultera This scope includes all labor and purchases required produce photocathodes required by CBETA.

EPJ Web of Conferences 95,

COMMISSIONING OF THE ALBA FAST ORBIT FEEDBACK SYSTEM

Detailed Design Report

Equipment Installation, Planning, Layout, organisation and updates

Photo cathode RF gun -

First Simultaneous Top-up Operation of Three Different Rings in KEK Injector Linac

Sérgio Rodrigo Marques

Future Performance of the LCLS

STATUS OF THE SWISSFEL C-BAND LINEAR ACCELERATOR

High Brightness Injector Development and ERL Planning at Cornell. Charlie Sinclair Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics

EUROFEL-Report-2007-DS EUROPEAN FEL Design Study

Beam instrumentation at the 1-MW proton J-PARC RCS

Periodic Seasonal Variation of Magnets Level of the STB ring

COMMISSIONING RESULTS OF BEAM DIAGNOSTICS FOR THE PETRA III LIGHT SOURCE

Scavenger Extraction. Karen Goldsmith Shawn Alverson

Current status of XFEL/SPring-8 project and SCSS test accelerator

TOP-UP OPERATION IN LIGHT SOURCES

Electron Bypass Line (EBL) Design Electrons to A-line bypassing LCLS T. Fieguth, R. Arnold

RADIATION SAFETY SYSTEM OF THE B-FACTORY AT THE STANFORD LINEAR ACCELERATOR CENTER

Accelerator Instrumentation RD. Monday, July 14, 2003 Marc Ross

LHC Nominal injection sequence

CONSTRUCTION AND COMMISSIONING OF BEPCII

CERN S PROTON SYNCHROTRON COMPLEX OPERATION TEAMS AND DIAGNOSTICS APPLICATIONS

Status of CTF3. G.Geschonke CERN, AB

Screen investigations for low energetic electron beams at PITZ

SUMMARY OF THE ILC R&D AND DESIGN

INFN School on Electron Accelerators. RF Power Sources and Distribution

TITLE PAGE. Title of paper: PUSH-PULL FEL, A NEW ERL CONCEPT Author: Andrew Hutton. Author Affiliation: Jefferson Lab. Requested Proceedings:

Activities on FEL Development and Application at Kyoto University

Safety Considerations For The Top-up Operation Of An 8 GeV Class Synchrotron Radiation Facility

Development of beam-collision feedback systems for future lepton colliders. John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science, Oxford University

Status and Plans for PEP-II

ANKA Status Report. N.Smale, A.-S. Müller, E. Huttel, M.Schuh Slides courtesy of A.-S. Müller and C.Heske.

Development of an Abort Gap Monitor for High-Energy Proton Rings *

CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3

SLAC R&D Program for a Polarized RF Gun

A Fifteen Year Perspective on the Design and Performance of the SNS Accelerator

LEPTON COLLIDER OPERATION WITH CONSTANT CURRENTS Λ

Availability and Reliability Issues for the ILC

Beam Losses During LCLS Injector Phase-1 1 Operation

Proton Engineering Frontier Project

Bunch-by-bunch feedback and LLRF at ELSA

Transcription:

Top-Up Experience at SPEAR3

Contents SPEAR 3 and the injector Top-up requirements Hardware systems and modifications Safety systems & injected beam tracking Interlocks & Diagnostics

SPEAR3 Accelerator Complex XAFS NEXAFS PX PX PD/XAS PX BTS 5W, 1.6nA SAXS/PX 3GeV 10nm-rad 500 ma XAS/TXM ARPES 10Hz Single bunch/pulse Coherent XAS Environment 3GeV Injector Booster (White Circuit) LINAC/RF Gun N E S W

Top off at SPEAR3 o Rebuild SPEAR into SPEAR3 (1999-2003) o Operated at 100mA for ~6 years (beam line optics) o Recently increased to 200mA o Chamber components get hot at 500ma (450kW SR, impedance) o 500mA program suspended because of power load transient on beam line optics o Instead worked to top-off mode (beam decay mode, fill-on-fill) RF system and vacuum chamber rated for 500ma

Present Status o 13 exit ports taking SR (9 Insertion Device, 4 Dipole) o 7 ID ports presently in fill-on-fill open shutter mode o 4 dipole beam lines open shutter injection by end of October 2009 o Last two ID shutters fill-on-fill by June 2010 o Trickle charge 2011

current (ma) 100mA and 500mA Operation SPEAR 3 100 vs. 500 ma Fill Scenarios lifetime = 14 h @ 500 ma = 60 h @ 100 ma ~6.5 Amp-hr 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 500ma =180ma 100ma =12ma 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 time (hrs)

current (ma) current (ma) 500mA Injection Scenarios delivery time = 8 hr t fill = ~6-7 min delivery time = 2 hr t fill = ~1.5-2 min SPEAR 3 500 ma Fill Scenario lifetime = 14 h @ 500 ma SPEAR 3 500 ma Fill Scenario lifetime = 14 h @ 500 ma 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 delivery time = 0.5 hr t fill = ~17 sec 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 delivery time = 1 min t fill = ~0.5 sec (or 10ms single shot) 50 50 0 0 6 12 18 24 0 0 6 12 18 24 time (hrs) time (hrs)

Gun o higher current o stablize emission rate o laser-assisted emission Linac o restore 2 nd klystron (higher energy, feedback) o phase-lock linac and booster rf Booster o improve capture with modified lattice o improve orbit and tune monitors o develop fast turn-on mode BTS o eliminate vacuum windows (done) o diagnostics SPEAR o add shielding, interlocks o improve kicker response o transverse feedback Beamlines o add shielding, interlocks o timing Hardware Upgrades B120 SLM room BTS 3 GeV Booster B116-101 B117 control room B118 power supplies B140 B130 B132-101 RF RF HVP S LTB B132-102 120 MeV linac B131

SPEAR3 Injection Notes Vertical Lambertson septum (booster outside ring) - operates DC, skew quadrupole added Three magnet bump ~15 mm amplitude, ~12mm separation Injection across three cells (sextupoles) Slotted stripline kickers (DELTA, low impedance) Transverse field dependence in K2 Injected beam Plan view Stored beam Elevation view

Septum wall Septum wall Hardware Upgrade: BTS Windows With windows: ~20% beam loss No windows: ~no loss Huang & Safranek

Injected beam profile measurements Turn number Visible diagnostic beam line Movies

Hardware upgrade: Injection Timing and Energy Synchrotron oscillations measured with turn-by-turn BPMs: Before correction After correction Kickers set to dump injected beam each cycle Injection energy stable Injection time varies over hours RF cable temperature Develop method to measure timing with stored beam Huang, Safranek & Sebek

Hardware upgrade: Injection Bump Closure Kickers can interrupt data acquisition o What is interruption sequence? depends on current ripple, beam lifetime and charge/shot bunch train filling needs new booster RF system o Gated data acquisition H V Single shot injection kicker transient = ~10 ms (~0.1 ms with feedback) o Tests with beam lines no complaints o Lots of work ms to match kicker waveforms Huang & Safranek

Hardware Upgrade: PEP-II Bunch Current Monitor downconverter schematic downconverter chassis bunch-by-bunch processor chassis A.S.Fisher - visible APD (ASP) - x-ray APD (CLS)

Hardware Upgrade: Thermionic Cathode as a Photo-Emitter Nominal configuration Tungsten dispenser-cathode (1000 C) 1.5 cell RF gun e- beam 2.856 GHz (2 s) S-band RF gun with thermionic cathode, alpha magnet, and chopper Most charge during the 2 μs RF pulse stopped at the chopper 5-6 S-band buckets pass into the linac, single booster bucket SPEAR3 single bunch injection, 10Hz presently ~50pC/shot

Photo-emission cathode (cont d) Laser-driven configuration 1.5 cell RF gun cold-cathode e- beam (~500ps) 2.856 GHz (~2 s) UV or green laser 1.5W heating Cu S.Gierman high singe-bunch charge for top-off - reduce beam loading in linac - eliminate cathode back bombardment - eliminate chopper UV Green Sara Thorin/MAXLab, EPAC'08 'Turning the thermionic gun into a photo injector has been very successful '

The Injected Beam Safety Dilemma Radiation Safety: the first hurdle o AP studies to demonstrate injected beam can not escape shielding o Many clever scenarios (dreams and zebras) o BL shielding sufficient? (higher average current, more bremsstrahlung) o PPS/BCS interlock modifications o Do users wear badges? Efficient injection into main ring o Injection time, charge/shot, repetition rate Safety is complicated!

Synchrotron Radiation Exit Ports SPEAR3 DBA cell 18

Vacuum Chamber Construction BPMs H2 ABSORBER 220 L/S ION PUMP V3 MASK V4 MASK V1, V2 MASKS ID BPM TSP H1 ABSORBER QFC BPM BM-1 BPM TSP H3 ABSORBER 220 L/S ION PUMP BPM BELLOWS 150 L/S ION PUMP BELLOWS TSPs BM-2 BPM ADDITIONAL BPM SET 18.8 mm 13 mm 24 mm ID BPM EDDY CURRENT BREAK 44.2 mm 34 mm 84 mm

Photon Beam Exit Channel outside absorber inside absorber photon beam e- beam

A Closer Look

Top-Up with Safety Shutters Open Stored Beam Injected Beam X-Rays Fixed Mask NORMAL X-Rays Ratchet Wall Stored Beam Injected Beam X-Rays SAFE X-Rays Injected Beam Stored Beam Injected Beam X-Rays ACCIDENT X-Rays Injected Beam 22

Is this a real possibility? Stored Beam Injected Beam X-Rays ACCIDENT Injected Beam Experimental X-Rays Floor Shield Wall Bad magnet fields Bad steering, energy Simulation is necessary! 23

SSRL Approach to Calculations Incoming Beam SPEAR3 Magnets Beamline A1 A2 Fixed Mask I Fixed Mask II Comb Mask 9.1 Ratchet Wall No assumptions about initial steering All physical positions and angles possible Energy errors! Start Point INSERTION DEVICE CM QF QD BEND SD Field simulation region Safe Endpoint Stored Beam on design orbit No magnetic field Straight trajectories Beamline Apertures Vacuum Chamber Radiation Masks Wide fringe fields A.Terebilo

Forward Propagation Only Fixed Mask A2 Aperture Ratchet Wall (2-ft Concrete) Injected Beam A1 Aperture Chamber boundary Stored Beam 25

Horizontal Angle (rad) X' [rad] Trajectories in Phase Space vacuum chamber acceptance fixed mask -0.08-0.1-0.12-0.14-0.16 Phase Space at Z = Fixed Mask Phase Space at Z = Ratchet Wall Ratchet Wall Opening Fixed Mask Opening spread in angles o 10 bend (far fringe field) -0.18-0.2-0.22-0.24-3 -2.5-2 -1.5-1 -0.5 0 X [m] Horizontal Position (m) 26

X' [rad] X' [rad] X' [rad] X' [rad] Evolution of allowed phase space A1 A2 Fixed Mask I Ratchet Wall BPM 7 BPM 1 Insertion Device QF QD BEND SD HCOR X-Rays to Beamline Stored Beam on design orbit 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 Initial: A1 and BPM7 After BPM1 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.2 0.01 0 0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.01-0.02-0.03 BPM1 After QF A2 Dipole Entrance -0.8-0.06-0.04-0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 X [m] 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 Dipole Entrance Dipole Exit SD Exit -0.04-0.08-0.06-0.04-0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 X [m] Allowed Phase Space in BL coordinates -0.08-0.1-0.12-0.14-0.16-0.18-0.2 Z = SD exit Z = Fixed Mask Z = Ratchet Wall -0.02-0.04-0.15-0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 X [m] -0.22-0.24-3 -2.5-2 -1.5-1 -0.5 0 X [m] 27

X' [rad] The Metric: Separation in Phase Space to Apertures -0.08-0.1-0.12 Phase Space at Z = Fixed Mask Phase Space at Z = Ratchet Wall -0.14 Fixed Mask Opening Ratchet Wall Opening -0.16-0.18-0.2-0.22-0.24-3 -2.5-2 -1.5-1 -0.5 0 X [m] 28

Offset [m] BL apertures and Extreme Ray position [m] The Extreme Ray A1 BPM 7 ID BPM 1 A2 QF QD BEND SD beam pipe w/apertures 0 Beamline apertures and the most severely mis-steered beam Beamline Axis Extreme Ray Stored Beam on design orbit -0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1 Extreme Ray Separation at Fixed Mask rise/run ~ -0.1 rad BL4 BL5 BL6 BL7 BL9 BL10 BL11 mis-steered beam ratchet wall -1.2 All other Trajectories -1.4 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Z [m] Position along beam line [m] 29

Condition for Abnormal Scenario special SLAC interpretation Large SPEAR3 magnet field error - and/or - Large injected beam energy error - AND - extensive intentional steering 30

BL aperture and Extreme Ray position [m] Parameter Sensitivity 0.2 0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1 BL5 BL6 BL7 BL9 BL10 BL11 Nominal B/B = -10% B/B = -50% B/B = -60% -1.2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Z[m] from ID center Parameter To Pass Beyond Fixed Mask To Pass Beyond Ratchet Wall E INJ /E SPEAR +59% +100% +10% B/B -48% -60% -1% (-10%) QF -100% Only with polarity reversed -25% Target Value for Interlock Limit QD +300% 55% (PS Limit) HCOR 22 mrad 30 mrad 3mrad (2 x PS Limit)

Alignment of Apertures is Critical Ratchet Wall A1 A2 X-Rays to Beamline A3 Insertion Device QF QD BEND SD HCOR PM Stored Beam on design orbit SPEAR Apertures Beamline-Specific Aperture +60 / -43 mm +50 / -43 mm BL9: +112 / -101 mm

Mechanical Drawings & Tolerances Experimental Floor x x x Ring Aperture ID source Fixed Mask Documentation Periodic checks More documentation 33

Dose Calculations & Testing mis-steer and measure Bauer & Liu

Hazard Mitigation Passive Systems -Limiting apertures in transport line (BTS) -Limiting apertures in SPEAR3 and beam lines - Permanent magnets for dipole beam lines Active Systems (Redundant Interlocks) - Injection energy interlock - BTS dipole supply - SPEAR3 magnet supplies - Stored beam interlock - Radiation detectors at each beam line 35

Interlock Hierarchy Hardware Interlock Envelope (reportable incident) Software Alarm Envelope A path 1 B Software Monitor Envelope * * path 2

A Rastafarian Logic Table Corbett & Schmerge

SPEAR3 Operating Sequence 1. Load operational lattice - software check of PS readbacks 2. Inject to <20 ma (orbit interlock) 3. Start orbit feedback (few microns) 4. Inject to 50 ma top-off permit 5. Open beam line injection stoppers 6. Fill 500 ma maximum (FOFB runs continuous) 7. Fill-on-fill or trickle charge