RTT TECHNOLOGY TOPIC April 2007 Terrestrial TV - The notion of positive cross over value

Similar documents
PROMAX NEWSLETTER Nº 25. Ready to unveil it?

Hands-On Real Time HD and 3D IPTV Encoding and Distribution over RF and Optical Fiber

RTT TECHNOLOGY TOPIC March 2007 UHFMTS

The long term future of UHF spectrum

MAPON digital video distribution in the European ACTS CRABS Project: simulation and experiment

White Paper. Fibre Optic Technologies for Satellite Communication and Broadcast Industries. By Tom Lacey Applications Engineering Group PPM Ltd, UK

All-digital planning and digital switch-over

PROMAX NEWSLETTER Nº 18

Digital Terrestrial HDTV Broadcasting in Europe

Advanced Television Broadcasting In A Digital Broadband Distribution Environment

Understanding IPTV "The Players - The Technology - The Industry - The Trends - The Future"

touch Field Strength Meter HD RANGER 2 see to believe! THE smart field strength meter YOU must have

Internet driven convergence: innovation and discontinuity

DVB-T2 Transmission System in the GE-06 Plan

PROMAX NEWSLETTER Nº 22

Broadband System - K

Symmetrical Services Over HFC Networks. White Paper

Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) is a Great European Success Story. Challenges for DTT. The European Spectrum Discussion

Portable TV Meter (LCD) USER S MANUAL

EBU view How should we use the digital dividend?

Opti Max Nodes Digital Return System

REGIONAL NETWORKS FOR BROADBAND CABLE TELEVISION OPERATIONS

THE FUTURE OF NARROWCAST INSERTION. White Paper

P1: OTA/XYZ P2: ABC c01 JWBK457-Richardson March 22, :45 Printer Name: Yet to Come

Illinois Telephone Users Group. Peoria, IL June 6, 2007

The implementation of HDTV in the European digital TV environment

PROMAX NEWSLETTER Nº 26. HD RANGER 2 see to believe! touch

WDM Video Overlays on EFM Access Networks

A LOW COST TRANSPORT STREAM (TS) GENERATOR USED IN DIGITAL VIDEO BROADCASTING EQUIPMENT MEASUREMENTS

DOCSIS 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business

DOCSIS 3.1 roll Out First Lessons Learned DOCSIS 3.1 roll Out First Lessons Learned

CHP Max Headend Optics Platform CHP CORWave II

TCF: Hybrid fibre coax systems Online course specification

OmniStar GX2 Headend Optics Platform

Access technologies integration to meet the requirements of 5G networks and beyond

Introduction. Fiber Optics, technology update, applications, planning considerations

Crossing the. Diplex Chasm. to 85 MHz. Author: Todd Gingrass Cable & Media Solutions

John Stankey President and CEO AT&T Operations

COMPLICATED IN THEORY, SIMPLER IN PRACTICE

This presentation will give you a general idea of the subjects on the 18 CATV-HFC seminars that are available from:

BALANCING THE REVERSE PATH

Joint submission by BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5, S4C, Arqiva 1 and SDN to Culture Media and Sport Committee inquiry into Spectrum

OmniStar GX2 Headend Optics Platform

Laboratory platform DVB-T technology v1

REVOLUTIONISING THE MARKET. AGAIN

Note for Applicants on Coverage of Forth Valley Local Television

6.3 DRIVERS OF CONSUMER ADOPTION

High Efficiency Video coding Master Class. Matthew Goldman Senior Vice President TV Compression Technology Ericsson


TV4U QUAD DVB-S2 to DVB-C TRANSMODULATOR

4K UHDTV: What s Real for 2014 and Where Will We Be by 2016? Matthew Goldman Senior Vice President TV Compression Technology Ericsson

The future role of broadcast in a world of wireless broadband ITG Workshop Sound, Vision & Games

RANGERNeo Lite TV, CABLE, SATELLITE & WIFI ANALYSER HEVC H.265 EASY OPERATION WIFI ANALYSER WIDEBAND LNB A NEW STANDARD IN FIELD STRENGTH METERS

Annex J: Outline for Bhutan DTV Road Map

Multimedia Standards

TV Radio Multimedia. Optical Nodes, 1218 MHz and 1006 MHz amplifiers, distribution and connection technology

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Verizon New England Inc. Application for a Compliance Order Certificate for Rhode Island Service Areas 1 and 4. Exhibit 3

The DTH teleport - challenges and opportunities

SERIES J: CABLE NETWORKS AND TRANSMISSION OF TELEVISION, SOUND PROGRAMME AND OTHER MULTIMEDIA SIGNALS Digital transmission of television signals

4.1. Improving consumers' experience by ensuring high quality standards for terrestrial digital television receivers in Europe

Re: Implementation of Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices, CS Docket 97-80

newsletter 29 INTRODUCING THE WORLD S FIRST HEVC H.265 METER & TV ANALYSER

Response to Ofcom Consultation The future use of the 700MHz band. Response from Freesat. 29 August 2014

FOGGY DOCSIS AN ENABLENCE ARTICLE WRITTEN BY JIM FARMER, CTO APRIL,

Global Forum on Competition

PRACTICAL PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS OF LTE BROADCAST (EMBMS) FOR TV APPLICATIONS

Technology Advances. Ashaad Rambharos CSE Intelsat Africa

Digital Switchover in UHF: Supporting tele-learning applications over the ATHENA platform

The Untapped Potential of Hybrid Fibre Coaxial Networks

SEFRAM 7870 series The feeling of a new way of measurement

R&S SFD DOCSIS Signal Generator Signal generator for DOCSIS 3.1 downstream and upstream

The Future of Satellites. Alex Epshteyn Senior Principal Regulatory Engineer

The transition to Digital Terrestrial TV and utilisation of the digital dividend in Europe

DTH. Direct-to-Home SOLUTION GUIDE. How to maintain quality and availability while going for profitability.

Forward-Looking Statements

DOCSIS SET-TOP GATEWAY (DSG): NEXT GENERATION DIGITAL VIDEO OUT-OF-BAND TRANSPORT

Prisma D-PON System ONT and Upstream Receiver

Impacts on Cable HFC Networks

RANGERNeo + ATSC TV, CABLE, SATELLITE & WIFI ANALYSER HEVC H.265 WIFI ANALYSER EASY OPERATION WIDEBAND LNB A NEW STANDARD IN FIELD STRENGTH METERS

MIGRATION TO FULL DIGITAL CHANNEL LOADING ON A CABLE SYSTEM. Marc Ryba Motorola Broadband Communications Sector

Advanced Coding and Modulation Schemes for Broadband Satellite Services. Commercial Requirements

RF RETURN OPTIONS AN ENABLENCE ARTICLE WRITTEN BY JIM FARMER, CTO. September,

ESA Ground Segment Technology Workshop 5-June-08. Ka band for Broadband and IPTV

European perspectives on digital television broadcasting Conclusions of the Working Group on Digital Television Broadcasting (WGTB)

WHITE PAPER. Comprehensive Node Analysis Assures Big Upstream Gains For DOCSIS 3.0 Channel Bonding

ITU-T SG9 and the future of cable television

AN EXPLORATION OF THE BENEFITS OF MIGRATION TO DIGITAL BROADCASTING

Prisma D-PON System 1550 nm Downstream Transmitter and EDFA

Digital Switchover in Chinese Taipei

NEWS. What s the difference between Cable and DSL broadband access? Part 1

NEWS What s The Difference Between Cable And DSL Broadband Access?

Digital Video Broadcasting and IPTV as alternatives to the OTT media services

RANGERNeo + TV, CABLE, SATELLITE & WIFI ANALYSER HEVC H.265 EASY OPERATION WIFI ANALYSER WIDEBAND LNB A NEW STANDARD IN FIELD STRENGTH METERS

BHUTAN current status for the Transition from Analogue to Digital Terrestrial Television Broadcasting

POST ASO WITH A SPECIAL REGARD TO THE SITUATION IN GERMANY. Elmar Zilles Head Broadcasting, Federal Network Agency, Germany

[Q] DRAW TYPICAL CABLE TV NETWORK PLAN AND STATE THE FUNCTION OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF AMPLIFIERS USED IN CABLE TV SYSTEM

The Emergence of Affordable Broadband Services for Remote Locations Using SFOC Technology Dr. William J. Barattino Mr. Nicholas Koopalethes

ENGINEERING COMMITTEE Interface Practices Subcommittee AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD ANSI/SCTE

Advanced HDTV System Analyzers

Transcription:

RTT TECHNOLOGY TOPIC April 2007 Terrestrial TV - The notion of positive cross over value In this month's Technology Topic we review the technology and engineering dynamics that are presently changing the terrestrial TV service proposition and the impact these changes will have on broadband fixed, portable and mobile devices. As analogue TV transmissions are switched off, digital terrestrial broadcast transmissions will be increased to power levels which potentially enable portable devices, including devices with internal antennas, to receive standard and in the longer term high definition TV. In parallel, sub sets of the DVB standard have been developed to optimize mobile handheld receiver performance. DVB H reduces power drain in cellular phones by time slicing and uses time slicing to support cell to cell handover algorithms. Proprietary solutions such as Media FLO are based on similar principals. In parallel, DVB SH based technologies are being introduced to support the delivery of satellite downlinks to mobile devices. The purpose of this Technology Topic is to explore the complementary positioning of digital terrestrial TV when compared to the whole range of alternative delivery options including fiber, cable and copper and the complementary positioning of digital terrestrial TV when compared with other forms of fixed, portable and mobile wireless access including satellite and cellular service provision. In particular we set out to discuss the role that digital terrestrial TV will play in realizing value from broadcast, broadband and cellular service integration. The Future of Fibre To do this, we need to study the present and potential future performance potential of other broadcast and broadband delivery options, starting with fibre. Fibre began as single wavelength then progressed to multiple wavelengths and more recently has progressed to multi mode, three generations of optical technology evolution. Essentially fibre comes in two flavours, multi mode and single mode. Single mode is used for backhaul and can support data rates of 40 g/bits or above. It has a loss of about.37 db per km at 1310 nanometres. It is expensive when compared with multi mode fibre and requires expensive connectors and exotic laser diodes. Multi mode is used in final mile applications. In a multi mode fibre, if the angle of the light entering the fibre is changed then that light 'channel' will follow a certain reflective

path. This means it will have travelled a different distance to other light channels introduced at a different angle and will therefore arrive at a different time at the receiver. This is the basis for time division multiplexing and allows for up to 64 'channels' to be supported. Multi mode fibre is relatively low cost when compared to single mode fibre and does not require expensive high precision connectors. However it has a relatively high propagation loss, about.8db per km at 1310 nanometres and relatively low bandwidth when compared with single mode. Newer multi mode fibre also supports shorter wavelength transmission at 1510 nanometres. Attenuation losses reduce to about.23 db per km but chromatic dispersion is worse. Multi mode fibre is used extensively in passive optical networks. The ITU-T G983 specification defines the downstream at 1490 nm at 622 M/bits/s, a 155 M/bits upstream at 1310 nanometres and an RF video overlay at 1550 nanometres. The 18 billion dollar FioS Optical network being deployed by Verizon in the US is an example of a passive optical network based on a combination of multi mode and single mode fibre transport. Even allowing for multiplexing on the multi mode drop, these networks offer super fast downloads of recorded content including high definition video, multiple (200 or more) standard TV channels and high definition TV. Peak rates are capped per user but can be 45 M/bit/s and could theoretically be much higher. Both multi mode and single mode fibre have substantial untapped bandwidth potential which will be realized as optical components improve over time. The only problem with fibre is the installation cost given that competitive access options have either been fully amortized (copper) or written down (cable). The 3G Cable Proposition Cable data rates are lower than fibre but in common with fibre are increasing over time. The increase in data rate has primarily been delivered through the adoption of higher order modulation schemes. The downstream frequencies used in cable are typically from 42 to 850 MHz with an upstream between 5 and 42 MHz in the US and between 5 and 65 MHz in Europe. The table below shows how data rates have increased over the past ten years over three generations of DOCSIS (data over cable service interface specification). Table 1, Three generations of DOCSIS cable specification DOCSIS DOWNSTREAM UPSTREAM DOCSIS 1.0 38 M/bit/s 9 M/bit/s DOCSIS 2 38 M/bit/s 27 M/bit/s EURODOCSIS 2/DVB C 51 M/bits 9 M/bit/s

DOCSIS 3.0 160 M/bit/s 120 M/bit/s DOCSIS 3.0/Eurodocsis will be needed to support a credible offering of high definition TV and is designed to be IPV6 compatible. The higher data rates are achieved partly by higher order modulation schemes and partly by channel bonding. Eurodocsis is essentially a redistribution of the uplink/downlink budget to support the 8 MHz digital TV channel bandwidths and data rates needed to meet European DVB-C broadcast requirements. Table 2 shows DVB-C modulation options and data rates. Present standardization efforts are being directed towards producing a new iteration of DVB-C known as DVB- C2. Table 2, Example Modulation options and data rates for an 8 MHz digital TV channel Modulation 16QAM 32 QAM 64 QAM 128 QAM 256 QAM Data rate Mbit/s 25.64 32.05 38.47 44.88 51.29 These higher order modulation schemes are noise sensitive. This suggests that present cable networks may need substantial additional investment to ensure that sufficient bandwidth is available to support a competitive high definition TV proposition and acceptable down load times for high definition content. This of course strengthens the business case for competitive or preferably complementary fiber investment but also implies a substantial engineering common interest between cable and fiber in final mile access platforms. The copper alternative The copper alternatives are shown in Table 3. In common with cable modems, ADSL modems use higher order modulation schemes, typically 16 level QAM. ADSL2+ sacrifices uplink bandwidth to deliver a 24 M/bit downstream which can be increased theoretically to 48 M/bit/s using channel bonding. These higher order modulation schemes combined with adaptive channel coding schemes deliver data rates that are presently competitive for internet access but marginal for high definition TV. VDSL modems add in an OFDM multiplex to deliver some additional bandwidth gain but are severely distance limited. The 100 M/bit high profile service for example needs to be within 350 meters of a fiber node. As with cable this suggests that present copper networks may need substantial additional investment to ensure that sufficient bandwidth is available to support a competitive high definition TV proposition and acceptable down load times for high definition content. This strengthens the business case for competitive or preferably complementary fibre investment but also implies a substantial engineering common interest between copper and fiber in final mile access platforms.

Table 3, ADSL and VDSL Modem options and data rates ADSL Downstream Upstream VDSL2 ADSL2 12 M/bit/s 3.5 M/bit/s Low profile Medium High Profile Profile ADSL2 + 24/48 M/bit/s 1 M/bit/s 25 M/bit/s 30 M/bit/s 100 M/bit/s The DVB-S satellite alternative Satellites are power budget limited. For this reason, DVB S satellites use QPSK or 8 PSK modulation. These modulation schemes have less amplitude modulation than QAM schemes and therefore support more power efficient RF power amplifiers. Present standardization efforts are being directed towards producing a new iteration of DVB-S known as DVB-S2 based on using 16 PSK and 32 PSK modulation combined with adaptive variable source coding (AVC). Table 4 shows the data rates needed for present SDTV and HDTV transmission and the possible data rates achievable using AVC coding. High definition TV occupies over four times the bandwidth of a standard definition transmission. Compression schemes such as AVC provide a partial solution to this but increase error and jitter sensitivity. Similar constraints apply to MPEG4 based coding schemes. A 36 MHz satellite transponder capable of supporting 25 standard definition TV Programmes will be hard pressed to support more than 5 or 6 HDTV channels. Table 4, DVB-S Data rates Definition Data rate Data rate with AVC coding SDTV 4.4 M/bit/s 2.2 M/bit/s HDTV 18 M/bit/s 9 M/bit/s Terrestrial TV We have covered terrestrial TV technologies in various prior Hot Topics/Technology Topics. August 1999 '3GTV', May 2005 'Adaptive Systems' and June 2005 'Broadcast Over Cellular' all provide useful reference. Terrestrial TV has a significant advantage over satellite in that it is potentially neither power nor bandwidth limited. The need to co share spectrum with analogue transmissions has required digital TV to transmit at sub optimum power levels but this constraint disappears once analogue transmissions are switched off. There are obvious opportunities to increase signal strengths over and above present analogue TV transmissions by increasing the number of DVB transmission sites. Cellular operators are a natural partner in this process. This opens up the possibility of supporting a wider range of portable and mobile devices including the use of these devices within buildings.

It could of course be argued that in building portable and mobile device applications can also be serviced by a combination of fiber, cable or copper access combined with WiFi. However it would be economically hard for any alternative delivery options (including cellular and/or possible future combined WiFi/WiMax networks) to match the ability of terrestrial TV to deliver a 20 M/bit or 30 M/bit downlink to devices irrespective of where or how they are being used. Discussions are ongoing as to how much of the UHF bandwidth terrestrial broadcasters retain after the analogue to digital switchover is complete. Even if the cellular industry took 100 MHz of digital dividend spectrum there would still be 300 MHz available to support a broad range of national and local standard and high definition TV multiplex options. Terrestrial TV therefore has a significant role to play in the standard and high definition TV delivery process including the delivery of these services to portable and mobile devices. The developing interdependency of all delivery options. Differentiating positive and negative cross over value opportunities. However terrestrial TV should be regarded as complementary rather than competitive to other delivery options. In practice all delivery options across both fixed and mobile access domains have a developing interdependency. As this interdependency increases over time, the opportunity to release positive cross over value increases in parallel. Positive cross over value is the value realized from exploiting technology and engineering, market and business synergies across apparently competitive access platforms. For example it is quite possible and in fact probable that most households and corporate premises will be served by a combination of fibre, cable, copper and wireless access. There are capability overlaps across all four access domains and these overlaps create apparent competitive advantage opportunities. However if one of the access domains is used to cannibalize the revenues of other access domains then negative cross over value occurs. The present tension between the broadcasting community and the cellular industry over UHF spectrum allocation is based on an implicit assumption that the process will result in negative rather than positive cross over value. This is a mistake. The broadcasting industry needs the cellular industry. The cellular industry needs the broadcasting industry. The fibre industry needs the cable industry, the cable industry needs the fibre industry and everyone needs access to copper. Broadcast Broadband and Cellular Cross over Value Cross over value can be realized either from technology and/or engineering, market or

business common interest. Technology cross over value comes from the developing commonalities in signal processing and signal conditioning which are being applied across all access domains. For example OFDM techniques are used in wireless access and copper access, higher order adaptive modulation techniques are used in wireless, copper and cable access, multi mode fiber uses TDMA techniques that are similar to many other access system solutions. Engineering cross over value comes from exploiting engineering common interest, the co sharing of radio masts between the broadcasting and cellular community is one example, co sharing back haul is another, co sharing fiber, cable and copper cabinet space or conduit is another. Market cross over value is the process by which markets are expanded as a consequence of broadening the user experience. Triple play and quad play go some way towards realizing market cross over value but a genuine multi play offering would span all four access domains with a more balanced and integrated user proposition. Business cross over value is the process through which technology, engineering and market cross value is translated into corporate equity value, usually through merger and acquisition. Ericsson's acquisition of Marconi, strengthening their optical technology and engineering capability and their more recent acquisition of Tandberg TV, strengthening their TV technology and engineering capability is an exemplary example. Differentiating internal and external cross over value The realization of corporate equity cross over value is however usually hard to achieve. The reason for this is that businesses are structured internally to measure rewards on a business unit basis linked to investment. For example if an operator has invested substantial sums of money in fiber then the focus is not surprisingly delivering a return on that investment. The fastest way to realize a return is probably to cannibalize revenues from another access domain. This can lead to destructive internal competition which translates into negative internal and negative external cross over value. It certainly makes it harder to foster a spirit of internal technology, engineering and market collaboration. Confusing convergence with common interest Fixed mobile convergence is an over used term in our industry. In practice the bit rate difference between each of the access domains is increasing rather than decreasing over time, a process of divergence rather than convergence. This is not surprising given that all four access domains, fibre, cable, copper and wireless all benefit equally from improvements in signal conditioning and signal processing techniques. However this process of divergence broadens the user experience. As the user experience broadens, integration value increases.

Integration value at a micro level implies the exploitation of common interest across traditionally separate disciplines. Integration value at a macro level implies the exploitation of common interest across traditionally separate industries. Sometimes these separate industries have substantial existing technology and engineering common interest which can be used as the basis for developing market and business common interest. The repurposing of UHF spectrum provides a topical example of a potential common interest between the cellular industry and terrestrial TV. The objective has to be to deliver a net gain to all involved parties. This would be easier to achieve if standards bodies were less fragmented and if industry associations could come to terms with the need for collaboration and consolidation. Terrestrial TV - the 'value' of free to air content. Differentiating aspirational and inspirational value. We have focused on transmission related technology and engineering issues but there are of course directly related content production issues. The BBC has stated that all programme production will be in high definition by 2010, a decision that in itself implies substantial technology and engineering investment. Of course this does not mean all output will be transmitted in high definition but will certainly help to hasten the transition process. It is a not uncommon notion to consider that public service broadcasting is in decline. However in practice in many countries, public service broadcasting is alive and well though increasingly sensitive to the need to develop new revenue opportunities. Lord Reith's original mission to Educate, Inform and Entertain free from political interference is arguably now needed more than ever before. In this context it is worth reflecting that commercial broadcasting and public service broadcasting have different value models. Commercial broadcasting is dependent on advertising that is implicitly dependent on aspirational motivation - our willingness to buy things we did not know we needed. Public service broadcasting is or should be inspirational. It should make us want to achieve things that we did not know we wanted to achieve. Typically the process of achieving something implies a complex process of collaboration within and outside existing peer group structures. This requires efficient and effective two way communication. This is the domain in which the cellular industry has unique expertise and capability. This trigger process is often based on watching live rather than recorded events. Watching Wimbledon encourages us to play tennis with our friends, watching the Olympics may make us want to pole jump, watching a hurricane may make us want to save the world, the triumph of ambition over ability. In the world of public service broadcasting, live event based social networking is still a largely unexplored and under exploited phenomenon.

There is therefore a compelling content driven common interest that should in the future help to consolidate and integrate the cellular and broadcast industry user experience - the ultimate expression of positive cross over value. About RTT Technology Topics RTT Technology Topics generally reflect areas of research that we are presently working on. We aim to introduce new terminology and new ideas to clarify present and future technology and business issues. Do pass these Technology Topics on to your colleague, encourage them to join our Push List and respond with comments. Contact RTT RTT, the Shosteck Group and The Mobile World are presently working on a number of research and forecasting projects in the cellular, two way radio, satellite and broadcasting industry. If you would like more information on this work then please contact geoff@rttonline.com 00 44 208 744 3163