The preferred display color temperature (Non-transparent vs. Transparent Display)

Similar documents
Edge-Aware Color Appearance. Supplemental Material

LCD and Plasma display technologies are promising solutions for large-format

ALIQUID CRYSTAL display (LCD) has been gradually

Monitor QA Management i model

Selected Problems of Display and Projection Color Measurement

LMG EG01B - 17"

Research on Color Reproduction Characteristics of Mobile Terminals

ICC Color Symposium. Soft Proofing Revisit and Reborn. Chris Bai Senior Color Expert BenQ. 22/10/2018 Hong Kong. Organizers

P_02_1011:A Novel Pixel Circuit to Compensate for the Degradation of OLED Luminance in High-Resolution AMOLED Displays

Using Low-Cost Plasma Displays As Reference Monitors. Peter Putman, CTS, ISF President, ROAM Consulting LLC Editor/Publisher, HDTVexpert.

united.screens GmbH FUTURE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY 2017 united.screens GmbH

Common assumptions in color characterization of projectors

3/2/2016. Medical Display Performance and Evaluation. Objectives. Outline

MANAGING HDR CONTENT PRODUCTION AND DISPLAY DEVICE CAPABILITIES

Background Statement for SEMI Draft Document 4759A NEW STANDARD: TEST METHOD OF PERCEPTUAL ANGLE FOR OLED DISPLAYS

25.3: Observations of Luminance, Contrast and Amplitude Resolution of Displays

Murdoch redux. Colorimetry as Linear Algebra. Math of additive mixing. Approaching color mathematically. RGB colors add as vectors

LMT X1 - a 12.1" VHB

Current and Future Display Technology. NBA 6120 Donald P. Greenberg September 9, 2015 Lecture #4

Quantify. The Subjective. PQM: A New Quantitative Tool for Evaluating Display Design Options

Power that Changes. the World. LED Backlights Made Simple 3M OneFilm Integrated Optics for LCD. 3M Optical Systems Division

HEBS: Histogram Equalization for Backlight Scaling

Power saving in LCD panels

Colour Matching Technology

High-resolution screens have become a mainstay on modern smartphones. Initial. Displays 3.1 LCD

Advanced Display Technology (continued) Lecture 13 October 4, 2016 Imaging in the Electronic Age Donald P. Greenberg

MX194. Your advantages. 1MP Medical-Display

Figure 1: Media Contents- Dandelights (The convergence of nature and technology) creative design in a wide range of art forms, but the image quality h

A Luminance Adjusting Algorithm for High Resolution and High Image Quality AMOLED Displays of Mobile Phone Applications

Superior Digital Video Images through Multi-Dimensional Color Tables

Company Software Manual version Issued Date Sony Corporation Projector Calibration Pro Version 0.04 Mar 3rd, 2017

This talk covers currently available display technology.

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. EXPERIMENTS. Corresponding author: +1 (518) ;

Introduction. Characteristics (Note 1, 2) Parameters Typical Value Units Conditions

Visual Color Matching under Various Viewing Conditions

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Comparision Guide. Product Comparison HP Z Displays. HP Z Displays

Liquid Crystal Display (LCD)

Introduction. Characteristics (Note 1, 2) Parameters Typical Value Units Conditions

SAMSUNG SMART LED SIGNAGE IF SERIES BRILLIANT IMAGINATION. ON DISPLAY.

Concurrent Contrast and Brightness Scaling for a Backlit TFT-LCD Display. Outline

MX215. Your advantages. 2MP Medical-Display

Background Statement for SEMI Draft Document 4571J NEW STANDARD: TEST METHOD OF PDP TONE AND COLOR REPRODUCTION

27 Full HD IPS Technology Borderless Display VX2771-smhv-2

Efficient Implementation of Neural Network Deinterlacing

Minimizing the Perception of Chromatic Noise in Digital Images

Design and Implementation of an LED Mood Lighting System Using Personalized Color Sequence Generation

High Value-Added IT Display - Technical Development and Actual Products

User requirements for a Flat Panel Display (FPD) as a Master monitor in an HDTV programme production environment. Report ITU-R BT.

Color Gamut Mapping based on Mahalanobis Distance for Color Reproduction of Electronic Endoscope Image under Different Illuminant

MX215. Your advantages. 2MP Medical-Display

How to Match the Color Brightness of Automotive TFT-LCD Panels

Redefining Daylight Viewability

Line-Adaptive Color Transforms for Lossless Frame Memory Compression

Deep Dive into Curved Displays

PLASMA DISPLAY PANEL (PDP) DAEWOO D I G I T A L DIGITAL TV DEVISION

VP2780-4K. Best for CAD/CAM, photography, architecture and video editing.

RoHS Exemption Request Meeting

AS THE RAMPING liquid-crystal device TV (LCD-TV)

8K Resolution: Making Hyperrealism a Reality

Comparision Guide. Comparison Guide HP Z Displays. HP Z Displays

HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE SUBJECTIVE TESTING

High Brightness LEDs. Light Sources on Steroids

Tech Paper. HMI Display Readability During Sinusoidal Vibration

Accurate Colour Reproduction in Prepress

Evaluation of the Color Image and Video Processing Chain and Visual Quality Management for Consumer Systems

Color Reproduction Complex

Color measurement and calibration of professional display devices

High Efficiency White OLEDs for Lighting

S1934H-BK. Your advantages. 19" Office-Monitor

LG Electronics Monitor Proofing System with LG W2420R Display and Adobe Acrobat 8 Professional for GRACoL Coated #1

Empirical Equations for the Analysis of the Time Dependence of the Luminance Properties of LCD Panels and Backlights for TV Applications

Role of Color Processing in Display

pdf Why CbCr?

Planar LookThru OLED Transparent Display. Content Developer s Guide. 1 TOLED Content Developer s Guide A

A New Overlap-Scan Circuit for High Speed and Low Data Voltage in Plasma-TV

White Paper. Uniform Luminance Technology. What s inside? What is non-uniformity and noise in LCDs? Why is it a problem? How is it solved?

Data Supply Voltage Reduction Scheme for Low-Power AMOLED Displays

Public Information Display (PID) System. Display System Division / LED Program Material & Packaging Group / ASTRI

crystal radio receiver 1921

A Comparative Study of Color and Contrast Enhancement for Still Images and Consumer Video Applications

Smart Lighting Activities

:: Reduce needs for heat dissipation components. :: Extend battery life in mobile products. :: Save power and reduce heat generation in TVs

General viewing conditions for subjective assessment of quality of SDTV and HDTV television pictures on flat panel displays

Advanced Display Technology Lecture #12 October 7, 2014 Donald P. Greenberg

SXGA096 DESIGN REFERENCE BOARD

TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT FOR THE DELIVERY OF PROGRAMMES WITH HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE

DRAFT. Proposal to modify International Standard IEC

Organic Electronic Devices

AMBIENT LIGHT SENSOR IC

Bringing Better Pixels to UHD with Quantum Dots

TFT LCD Module Product Specification

PUBLISHABLE Summary To provide OLED stacks with improved reliability Provide improved thin film encapsulation

3012 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 57, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2010

The Diagnosis of Small Solitary Pulmonary Nodule:

EFFECTS OF HMD BACKLIGHT BLEED-THROUGH IN LOW-LIGHT AUGMENTED REALITY APPLICATIONS

Analysis of Background Illuminance Levels During Television Viewing

Colorimetric Characterization of Three Computer Displays (LCD and CRT) Jason E. Gibson and Mark D. Fairchild January, 2000

Calibrated Colour Mapping Between LCD and CRT Displays: A Case Study

CG3145. Your advantages. 31" Graphics-Monitor

Transcription:

The preferred display color temperature (Non-transparent vs. Transparent Display) Hyeyoung Ha a, Sooyeon Lee a, Youngshin Kwak* a, Hyosun Kim b, Young-jun Seo b, Byungchoon Yang b a Department of Human and systems Engineering, School of Design and Human Engineering, UNIST, Ulsan, Korea b Samsung Display Co., Ltd., Youngin-City, South Korea Abstract The preferred color temperature of a non-transparent display and an OLED transparent display was investigated. 24-inch LCD monitor was used to simulate both types of displays shown under two-different background color temperature (3000K and 6500K) conditions. Twenty observers participated the psychophysical experiment in a dark room. They were asked to choose the most preferred display image among the images having 9 different color temperatures. The results showed that as the color temperature of the surround decreases, the preferred color temperature of the monitor also decreases. Also it is found that the preferred color temperature of the total white (the monitor white plus transmitted light) of OLED transparent display is similar with that of the nontransparent display. Introduction Nowadays, displays are used under various surround conditions from a dark night to bright daylight. Such surround conditions have wide range of luminance levels and color temperatures. For example, people usually use their laptop in many different places such as office, house and coffee shop. In comparison with the office, surround color temperature in the coffee shop is more yellowish. As shown in Figure1, though a color temperature of a display is fixed, the monitor white looks like keep changing because of the color temperature changes of the surround. Especially the effect of surround condition on display image quality becomes more significant for the transparent display [1,2]. few studies about the preferred display color temperature under various ambient lighting conditions. Also only recently, researches on image quality of a OLED transparent display has been started [1,2]. In this study, the most preferred display color temperature was investigated by simulating an non-transparent and an OLED transparent display having various display color temperatures shown under two-different background color temperature (3000K and 6500K) conditions. Test Image Simulation Method Since OLED transparent display is not in the market yet, 24- inch wide color gamut LCD display is used to simulate a nontransparent and an OLED transparent displays showed under two different surround conditions. The peak white of the LCD display was 239 cd/m 2 and the resolution of LCD display was 1920x1200. Figure 2 shows two images used as background scene. One background image has 3000K color temperature and the other has 6500K color temperature. The average luminance of both image is 139.5 cd/m 2 and the resolution is 1920x1200. Figure 2. Background images: 6500K, 3000K Figure 1. Different surround conditions: fluorescent light such as in office environment, incandescent light such as in cafe To preserve the image quality regardless of the viewing condition, the display color temperature needs to be adjusted considering the surround condition. However, there are only a To simulate both non-transparent and transparent display, it is assumed that both displays have srgb color gamut and 2.2 gamma with 70 cd/m 2 peak white. Also it is assumed that color temperatures of both displays are adjustable from 3000K to 7000 K with 500K intervals. The degree of transparency of OLED transparent display is set to 40%. Four pictorial images were selected covering skin, fruits and landscapes for the experiment and each image was converted into gray scale using CIELAB L* scale. Each image had 960x600 resolution. Figure 3 shows the test images for psychophysical experiment. COLOR-308.1

(c) (d) Figure 3.Test images for psychophysical experiment: cottage, park, (c) people and (d) tree (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Figure 4. Example of test images: 3000K OLED display under 6500K surround, 6500K OLED display under 6500K surround, (c) 3000K OLED transparent display under 6500K surround, (d) 6500K OLED transparent display under 6500K surround, (e) 3000K OLED display under 3000K surround, (f) 6500K OLED display under 3000K surround, (g) 3000K OLED transparent display under 3000K surround, (h) 6500K OLED transparent display under 3000K surround CIEXYZ values of the background image and that of the test image summed up for each pixel to simulate the display showing on different background scenes. To simulate display bezel, black frame was added. The resulting CIEXYZ values were converted into RGB values using inverse LCD monitor characterization model. Figure 4 shows examples of test images. Therefore total 144 test images (= 4 images x 9 color temperatures x 2 display types x 2 background color temperatures) were prepared for psychophysical experiment. These images were shown on the 24 inch LCD display in a dark room. Psychophysical Experiment Twenty university students (Female: 10, Male: 10) having normal color vision participated in the experiment. Ishilhara test and 100 Farnsworth-Munsell hue test were tested to confirm whether they have normal color vision or not. In a dark room, observers sat in front of 24-inch LCD monitor showing the background image. After 5 minutes adaptation in each background, they were asked to select the most preferred color temperature among 9 different display color temperatures. The method of limit was used in this experiment. They observed the images, increasing or decreasing color temperatures using a keyboard, and then chose only one color temperatures among them. There was no time limitation. The same experiment was repeated to check the repeatability of participant. Therefore, each participant choose 32 color temperature responses (= 4 images x 2 display types x 2 background color temperatures x 2 trials) and all the responses from each participant were average to analyze the data. Figure 5 shows the procedure of this experiment. Figure 5. Experiment procedure Experimental Results To evaluate the repeatability of each participant, coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated. Figure 6 shows repeatability of each participant. Average CV of total participant is 7.8. The maximum CV is 11.8 and the minimum CV is 1.7. Since there was no outlier, all participant s data were used for analysis. Figure 6.Coefficient of variation for repeatability COLOR-308.2

Table 1. Result of the experiment Surround color temperature (K) Cottage Park People Tree Non-trans. Trans. Non-trans. Trans. Non-trans. Trans. Non-trans. Trans. 3000 4525 5475 4875 5388 4950 5688 4938 5438 6500 6225 5713 5975 5938 5913 5400 6263 5875 (c) (d) Figure 7. Relationship between surround color temperature and most preferred non-transparent display/ transparent display color temperature: cottage, park, (c) people and (d) tree Table 1 and Figure 7 summarize the average data. At first, it is notable that both display type and surround color temperature affect the preferred display color temperature significantly. Though the preferred display color temperature is not strongly affected by the image contents, the people image s preferred display color temperature of transparent display is slightly lower than others. The transmitted 6500K surround luminance made the skin tone more bluish. Therefore to make the skin tone natural, participant tended to select lower color temperature. Figure 8 directly compares the preferred monitor color temerature bewteen two different display types where x-axis is the most preferred color temperature of non-transparent display and y-axis is the most preferred color temperature of transparent display in each test image. On the average, when the surround color temperature is 6500K, the averaged most preferred color temperature are 6156K for a non-transparent display and 5794K for a transparent display. When the color temperature of a background scene is 3000K, the averaged most preferred color temperature are 4919K for non-transparent display and 5631K for transparent display. This result indicates that as the surround color temperature is lowered, lower monitor color tempereture is preferred. Higher display color temperature is preferred for the transparent display than that of non-transparent display especially when the surround color temperature is low. Figure 9 shows the reslut of cottage image as an example of preferred color temperature changes by the surround conditions and display types. COLOR-308.3

(c) (d) Figure 9.The most preferred color temperature of cottage image: 6200K of non-transparent display, 5850K of not-transparent display, (c) 4625K of transparent display and (d) 5850K of transparent display Figure 8. Preferred display color temperature comparison between the OLED transparent and the non-transparent displays (c) (d) Figure 10.Relationship between surround color temperature and most preferred non-transparent display/ total white color temperature: cottage, park, (c) people and (d) tree COLOR-308.4

In the case of transparent display, observers were watching not only the self-luminous display image but also transmitted background image. Therefore the preferred display color temperature difference between two display types is further analyzied by considering this situation. For the OLED transprent display result, the color temperature of total white i.e. addition of the display white and the transmitted background light was calculated. Figure 10 compares the color temperature of non-transparent display and that of total white as a function of surround color temperature and Figure 11 shows the direct comparison between the total white of the transparent display and the non-transparent display data. It is notable that the trend of total white color temperature is similar with that of non-transparent display color temperature. Also, the preferred total white color temperature is always a little lower than the preferred non-transparent display color temperature. Figure 12.Result of relationship between surround color temperature and most preferred color temperature. Figure 11. Preferred display color temperature comparison between the total white of OLED transparent and the non-transparent displays Figure 12 summarizes the overall result. The major findings of this study are as follows: (1) the most preferred color temperature of the monitor also decreases, as the color temperature of the surround decreases. (2) the preferred color temperature of total white of transparent display is slightly lower than that of non-transparent display at each surround color temperature. Conclusion The most preferred color temperature of an OLED nontransparent display and that of 40% OLED transparent display was investigated under 3000K and 6500K surround conditions. The simulated images on the LCD display were used to simulate the background scene and non-transparent/ transparent display. Twenty university students were participated in this experiment. After 5 minute adaptation in each background image, they asked to choose the most preferred color temperature of display. Same experiment was repeated to confirm the repeatability of each participant. Based on the psychophysical experiment results from twenty participant with four test images, it is discovered that the most preferred display color temperature decreases, as surround color temperature decreases. Moreover, people tend to prefer slight lower color temperature for total white of transparent display i.e. addition of the transparent diplay white and the transmitted background light than color temperature for non-transparent display. This study implies that the display color temperature needs to be controlled considering the surround color temperature. Especially to find the preferred color temperature of the transparent display, the transmitted background scene should be considered. Since the current study is based on the limited experimental condition, more thorough experiments are required to confirm the current study result. Acknowledgements This project was funded by Samsung Display Co., Ltd. References [1] Lee, Sooyeon, et al. "Preferred tone curve characteristics of transparent display under various viewing conditions." IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2015. [2] Kwak, Youngshin, et al. "15.3: Optimal Monitor Gamma of Transparent Display." SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. Vol. 46. No. 1. 2015. COLOR-308.5

[3] Choi, Kyungah, and Hyeon-Jeong, Suk. "User-preferred color temperature adjustment for smartphone display under varying illuminants." Optical Engineering 53.6 (2014): 061708-061708. [4] Choi, Kyungah, and Hyeon-Jeong Suk. "Optimal color temperature adjustment for mobile devices under varying illuminants." IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2014. Author Biography Hyeyoung Ha received her BS in human factors and affective engineering from UNIST(2015). Since then now she is a MS student of human and systems engineering in UNIST. Her work has focused on the display color appearance. Youngshin Kwak received her BS in physics from the Ehwa Woman s University (1995) and her Ph.D in color science from University of Derby(2003). Now she is an associate professor of human factors and systems engineering in UNIST. Her work has focused on the human color perception, color emotion, visual appearance, and image quality of 2D and 3D images. She is on the director of Vison 1 in CIE. Sooyeon Lee received her BS in system management engineering from SungKyunKwan University (2008) and her Ph.D in human and systems engineering from UNIST. Her work has focused on the image quality of 2D and 3D contents and display. Hyosun Kim is a senior engineer of Samsung Display Ltd., South Korea. She received her BS in Psychology(2001) and PhD in Cognitive Science from Yonsei University(2012). Her work has focused on the psychological effects of image quality. Young-jun Seo is a senior engineer of Samsung Display Ltd., South Korea. He received his MS in Electrical Engineering from Hanyang University(2006). His work has focused on the appearance modeling and the improvement of image quality for display. Byungchoon Yang received his BS, MS, and Ph.D(2002) in Electrical Engineering from Seoul National University. After a couple years of Post Doctorial discipline in University of Connecticut and BC Berkeley, he joined LCD Division of Samsung Electronics in 2004. He has been working on the color science and the optical signal processing area including the LED Backlight and the holographic technology in Samsung Display R&D center. COLOR-308.6