Appendix III: Definition of the Digital Preferred Service Area

Similar documents
Note for Applicants on Coverage of Forth Valley Local Television

House of Lords Select Committee on Communications Digital switchover of television and radio 20 January Digital UK Submission

700MHz Clearance Programme Information for Freeview channel providers

Conversion of Analogue Television Networks to Digital Television Networks

Digital Switchover Transmitter Details. Central Region

All-digital planning and digital switch-over

The availability of UHF spectrum for SAB after television switch-over J.A. Green, P.L. Marsden and

700MHz Clearance Programme Information for Freeview channel providers

PLANNING STUDIES INTO THE ALL-DIGITAL FUTURE AND DIGITAL SWITCH-OVER SCENARIOS

700MHz Clearance Programme Information for Freeview channel providers

Code of Practice on Changes to Existing Transmission and Reception Arrangements

Digital Switchover Transmitter Details. Meridian Region

The Future of Digital Terrestrial Television Enabling new services for viewers

digital television digital radio analogue spectrum planning

Consumer aerial survey. Implementing Ofcom s UHF Strategy

Wales Region Aerial Installer Newsletter Preseli Edition July 09

Digital Television Reception Predictors

Joint submission by BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5, S4C, Arqiva 1 and SDN to Culture Media and Sport Committee inquiry into Spectrum

Digital Switchover Management of Transition Coverage Issues Statement

Response to the Digital Dividend Review from Northern Visions/NvTv, 23 Donegall Street, Belfast BT1 2FF. Tel:

REVIEW OF THE GRANADA DIGITAL TV SWITCHOVER

Ofcom Local TV Transmission mode testing

Introduction. Introductory remarks

Response to Ofcom Consultation The future use of the 700MHz band. Response from Freesat. 29 August 2014

The long term future of UHF spectrum

Coexistence of new services in the 800 MHz band with digital terrestrial television

Arqiva response to digital dividend: clearing the 800 MHz band

Broadcast TV Technical Codes. Updates and amendments

High-definition services are included on both mux BBC B and the temporary HD Muxes.

Managing the effects of 700 MHz clearance on PMSE and DTT viewers. Summary of progress and call for input

The following pages list UK UHF DTT transmitters. These are arranged by region and then grouped into main stations with the relays in alphabetical

Digital UK and Ofcom Switchover Tracker Survey. Switchover Progress Report Q3 2008

Digital Switchover Transmitter Details. Westcountry Region

Digital dividend: 600 MHz band and geographic interleaved spectrum Consultation on potential uses

Springhead Road, Northfleet Kent, DA11 8HN Tel: web:

UK 700MHz Strategy and Digital Terrestrial Television update. Chris Woolford, Director of International Affairs, Ofcom 3 rd October 2013

REVIEW OF THE SCOTTISH BORDERS DIGITAL TV SWITCHOVER

North West Media Briefing

Practical experience gained during the introduction of digital terrestrial television broadcasting (DTTB) in Germany

DIGITAL SWITCHOVER & THE BBC S ROLE

Licence for the transmission of digital terrestrial television multiplex service

Digital Switch Over Experiences across Europe

SOUTH AFRICA BROADCASTING DIGITAL MIGRATION (BDM) A Z. the doc

D PSB Audience Impact. PSB Report 2011 Information pack June 2012

Digital Dividend in France. Eric Fournier Director Spectrum Planning and International Affairs Agence Nationale des Fréquences

User Requirements for Terrestrial Digital Broadcasting Services

Introduction of WSD in the UHF Band in Europe from a Broadcaster s Perspective

TV White Space Opportunities and Challenges

ECC Decision of 30 October on harmonised conditions for mobile/fixed communications networks (MFCN) operating in the band MHz 1

Telecommunication Development Sector

Ofcom and Digital UK Switchover Tracker Survey. Switchover Progress Report Q1 2007

Your essential guide to switchover

Further modelling. Technical analysis of interference from mobile network base stations in the 800 MHz band to digital terrestrial television

Northern Ireland: setting the scene

Awarding the UK s digital dividend

Regulatory framework for the assignment of the second digital dividend in Croatia

FAQ s DTT 1. What is DTT? 2. What is the difference between terrestrial television and satellite television?

National Broadcasting Council of Poland Transition to digital terrestrial television in Poland

BBC Red Button: Service Review

AIBD/ITU/ABU Pre Summit Regional Workshop on Enabling & Enhancing the DTT Broadcasting Experiences. 23 May 2016

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS SUBMISSION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ON THE ASTRONOMY GEOGRAPHIC

Utilisation of digital dividend in Hungary

Managing the effects of 700MHz clearance on PMSE and DTT viewers

DIGITAL TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION AND CURRENT ANALOG TV RECEPTION A GUIDE FOR THE GOULBURN VALLEY AND SHEPPARTON

DVB-T2 Transmission System in the GE-06 Plan

Advice on spectrum usage, HDTV and MPEG-4

2 Television and audio-visual content Recent developments in Scotland

Response summary from B.R.B.Robertson - That terrestrial HDTV is a priority, and an international rethink based on MPEG4/H264 is required.

db Broadcast reflect on their role in the largest broadcasting engineering project ever undertaken in the UK Digital Switchover

B - PSB Audience Impact. PSB Report 2013 Information pack August 2013

Switch off of Analogue Terrestrial Broadcasting. Standardization

RESEARCH DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTING AERIALS FOR THE SKYE (SKRIAIG) V.H.F. TELEVISION AND V.H.F. SOUND STATION

AN EXPLORATION OF THE BENEFITS OF MIGRATION TO DIGITAL BROADCASTING

ITU-D Regional Development Forum for the Arab Region: Access to spectrum, including broadcasting services trends and technologies

Securing long term benefits from scarce spectrum resources. A strategy for UHF bands IV and V

Australian Broadcasting Corporation Submission Digital Conversion of Self-Help Television Retransmission Sites

Official Journal of the European Union L 117/95

Regional News. Summary Report

DIGITAL TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION AND CURRENT ANALOG TV RECEPTION A GUIDE FOR THE DARLING DOWNS AND TOOWOOMBA

DTTB Implementation Australia Results and Effects of Digital Dividend

The Communications Market in England. 2 TV and audio-visual content

Broadcasting Digital Migration Made Easy

4.1. Improving consumers' experience by ensuring high quality standards for terrestrial digital television receivers in Europe

Channel 4 response to DMOL s consultation on proposed changes to the Logical Channel Number (LCN) list

Canada Gazette - Industry Canada Notice SMBR : DTV (Digital Television) Transition Allotment Plan

Maximising the benefits of 700 MHz clearance. Enabling acceleration of 700 MHz clearance and use of the 700 MHz centre gap

Freeview. Response to Information Request: Digital Terrestrial Television Broadcast Licences

Digital Terrestrial HDTV Broadcasting in Europe

BALANCING THE REVERSE PATH

PSB Annual Report 2015 PSB Audience Opinion Annex. Published July 2015

Maximising the benefits of 700 MHz clearance

Ofcom and Digital UK Switchover Tracker Survey. Switchover Progress Report Q3 2006

1.2 The NAB is the leading representative of South Africa s broadcasting industry representing:

DIGITAL TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION AND CURRENT ANALOG TV RECEPTION A GUIDE FOR TOWNSVILLE

Annex J: Outline for Bhutan DTV Road Map

Future pricing of spectrum used for terrestrial broadcasting A consultation

Digital Terrestrial Television Transition and Digital Dividend in the Republic of Serbia

Technical overview of the DVB-T2 switchover planning. cases studies. Digital Broadcasting Switchover Forum Johannesburg, South Africa

Implications and Optimization of Coverage and Payload for ATSC 3.0

The Meridian TV region switches to digital in The Meridian TV region switches to digital in Providing independent advice.

Transcription:

Appendix III: Definition of the Digital Preferred Service Area Contents: Introduction... 2 Definition of the DPSA... 3 Discussion... 6 National Boundaries... 6 Regional Boundaries... 9 Duplicated Coverage... 11 Protecting Re-broadcast Links... 11 Final Page 1 of 12 16 November 2007

Introduction The introduction of any new service within spectrum occupied by the six main multiplexes will result in a loss of predicted gross coverage. However, as in many areas there is significant overlap between stations if the loss of coverage was limited to these overlap areas there would not be any impact on net coverage. Consequently, in determining the impact of new applications in interleaved spectrum on the coverage of the six main multiplexes, an understanding of what defines the coverage of a station and what needs to be protected is required. The coverage of a station can be defined in many ways. An initial approach would be to assume that the viewer will continue watching the same station that they presently use to receive their analogue services. As such the definition for the analogue preferred service area (APSA) currently used for assessing damage to existing DTT and analogue networks could be used. However, with the reallocation and release of spectrum, coverage of stations in the digital network post DSO will differ slightly to that of the analogue network. Also, as 80 of the 1160 stations will offer three additional multiplexes it is likely that viewers, as they renew their existing aerials, will realign to the station offering the greatest number of multiplexes. For this study, initially three methods were considered for defining the digital preferred service area (DPSA) of stations post switchover. Each of these methods assumed that with time there would be no connection to existing analogue usage. 1. A pragmatic approach based on viewers wanting to receive as many multiplexes as possible. 2. A semi-pragmatic approach aimed at providing at least a 3PSB service. 3. Providing the best possible PSB service irrespective of commercial multiplex coverage. Of the three methods the second, the semi-pragmatic approach, has been adopted for this study. This definition of the DPSA ensures that 3PSB coverage is protected whilst recognising that viewers will attempt to watch a station that offers the greatest number of multiplexes. Final Page 2 of 12 16 November 2007

Definition of the DPSA The semi-pragmatic approach, assigns a viewer to the station that provides the greatest number of multiplexes on top of a 3PSB service. It takes no account of nationality or region. The DPSA is defined by the following rules. Rule 1 - A pixel must have 3PSB coverage. 3PSB coverage being defined as PSB1, PSB2 and PSB3, being available at 70% of locations or better and for at least 99% of time from the same station. Rule 2 - At any location (prediction pixel) 3PSB coverage may be predicted as being available from more than one station. In this case the pixel will be assigned to the station that offers the greatest number of multiplexes on the basis of the following steps. 1. If more than one station is available assign the service to the station providing the highest number of serving commercial multiplexes. In this case a serving commercial multiplex being one that is predicted to be available in at least 70% of locations and for at least 99% of time. 2. In the event that step 2 results in two or more stations having the same number of multiplexes available. o If six multiplexes are available assign the pixel to the station providing the highest availability for the worst performing PSB multiplex. o If fewer than six multiplexes are available assign the pixel to the station providing the highest availability for the worst performing commercial multiplex. It should be noted that this method may result in some PSB relay stations not being assigned any coverage, Figure AIII-1. Final Page 3 of 12 16 November 2007

Figure AIII-1a : Overview of DPSA Allocation Final Page 4 of 12 16 November 2007

Figure AIII-1b : Overview of DPSA Allocation Final Page 5 of 12 16 November 2007

Discussion The DPSA and its definition is a fundamental part of the method adopted for protecting the six main multiplexes. Analysis of the impact of the 71 interleaved channels has brought to light a number of improvements that could be made to the definition of the DPSA. Further work is required with respect to protection of coverage in the following areas. National boundaries Regional boundaries Duplicated coverage Protecting re-broadcast links Apart from some small refinement to account for improvements in protecting coverage in the areas mentioned above, the use of the DPSA to define and hence protect coverage, coupled with the planning rules adopted, can be viewed as a success. Use of the DPSA has allowed interleaved channels to be planned at 71 stations with effectively no impact on the overall coverage of the main six multiplex network (see Appendix I). National Boundaries The definition of the DPSA does not recognise national or regional borders. Consequently, on a national level particularly between the Wenvoe and Mendip and the Moel-y-Parc, Storeton, The Wrekin and Winter Hill transmitters the DPSA whilst protecting the best available service may not match viewer choice, Figures AIII-2 and AIII-3. In North Wales the DPSA assigns large areas, particularly along the coast to Winter Hill. Whereas this may well reflect viewer choice, it may not protect Welsh services. A similar situation occurs in South Wales where large areas are assigned to Mendip. Again whereas this may reflect viewer choice it may not protect the Welsh services. As with English stations being assigned coverage in Wales, Welsh stations are assigned coverage in England. Large parts of the Wirral and Liverpool are assigned to Moel-y-Parc rather than Storeton, The Wrekin or Winter Hill. Whereas this may represent the best service it probably won t reflect viewer choice and will not protect coverage of English stations. A similar situation occurs in Somerset and North Devon where the DPSA assigns coverage to Wenvoe. In Somerset, Mendip may provide a service but in this area Wenvoe is assigned the coverage as it has a higher availability even though it is unlikely that viewers in this area would watch Wenvoe. The situation along the North Devon coast is a little different. Terrain and the fact Huntshaw Cross and Mendip COM multiplexes are co-channel means that coverage (DPSA) is Final Page 6 of 12 16 November 2007

assigned to Wenvoe as either the best server or the station providing the greatest number of multiplexes. In areas where it is the station offering the greatest number of multiplexes it is possible that viewers will have receiving aerials aligned on Wenvoe. Sutton Coldfield Winter Hill Storeton Moel-y-Parc The Wrekin No 3PSB coverage Figure AIII-2 : DPSA allocation North Wales Final Page 7 of 12 16 November 2007

The DPSA definition needs to be refined to protect both the best service and the correct national service. This would ensure that English services from Winter Hill and Mendip are available in Wales, whilst protecting coverage from Welsh stations. Similarly in England it would protect Winter Hill or The Wrekin coverage in areas presently assigned to Welsh stations. Wenvoe Ridge Hill Mendip Bristol Kings Weston Stockland Hill No 3PSB coverage Figure AIII-3 : DPSA allocation South Wales Final Page 8 of 12 16 November 2007

Regional Boundaries A similar problem occurs on a regional level with stations having scattered coverage in areas where viewers wouldn t be expected to be watching a particular station. Whether this scattered coverage is correctly assigned is a little more difficult to resolve and if incorrectly assigned can have a detrimental effect on the quality of an interleaved channel. An example of possible incorrect assignment is the restriction on interleaved ch29 from Crystal Palace on a bearing of 300 ETN, Figure AIII-5, to protect Waltham coverage in the village of Longborough (18 households), Figure AIII-4. Sutton Coldfield Oxford Waltham Lark Stoke Sandy Heath No 3PSB Figure AIII-4 : Waltham Coverage in Longborough Final Page 9 of 12 16 November 2007

Figure AIII-5 : Crystal Palace Template ch29 @211m a.g.l. 10kW ERP Presently, pre-dso, the APSA assigns the area around Longborough primarily to Oxford with some coverage from Sutton Coldfield; both being stations you would associate with the area. With the re-assignment of spectrum and a change in the interference in the area, post DSO the DPSA assigns a small part of the area to Waltham as it provides a 3PSB service and the highest number of serving multiplexes. Coverage of Oxford in the area is limited by interference from the COM multiplex at Waltham on ch57 which is co-channel with a PSB multiplex at Oxford. In this case it is unlikely that the affected viewers would consider watching Waltham as Oxford and Sutton Coldfield are available in the area. Thought needs to be given as to how the DPSA definition can be refined to deal with such situations. In refining the algorithm to better reflect regional choice care needs to be taken not to eliminate viewers that are watching stations in unexpected locations. Indeed it may be better to allow an experienced planner to judge whether a restriction is required or not. The following are examples of possible problems During the DTT equalisation programme, Ridge Hill COM services were put co-channel with Oxford analogue. At the time, according to predictions, no problems were expected. So it was with some surprise that the planners heard about a small community in the Forest of Dean that had lost coverage of Oxford. In this case the area affected was some 120km from Oxford, actually outside the prediction area. Local terrain precluded the use of Ridge Hill, the local station, primarily due to ghosting but allowed viewers an Oxford signal through a gap in the hills. Final Page 10 of 12 16 November 2007

Another example is Waltham coverage in the village of Bishop s Itchington. This village is well outside Waltham s nominal service area but there are current analogue viewers in the area and Waltham is predicted as providing a service post switchover, Figure AIII-6. Sutton Coldfield (SC) Oxford (OF) Waltham (WBF) Lark Stoke (LKK) Sandy Heath (SDT) No 3PSB coverage Figure AIII-6 : Waltham scattered coverage Bishops Itchington It should be noted that though viewers in Bishops Itchington are presently watching Oxford analogue, as Oxford (PSB) will be co-channel with Waltham (COM) ch57 post-dso no service (DPSA) is assigned to Oxford. Waltham will be assigned a service in the area because though Oxford and Waltham are co-channel it is a Waltham COM service that is affected so 3PSB is available and a DPSA can be assigned to the station. Final Page 11 of 12 16 November 2007

Duplicated Coverage The DPSA assigns a viewer to a single station. As stations are differentiated by station number the DPSA as with the APSA doesn t protect services from the same station which have a different station number. Examples of this inability to differentiate between services are the Ridge Hill West multiplex radiated from Ridge Hill, the Storeton Welsh service from Storeton and any station with vertically and horizontally polarised components most notably Rowridge. Ridge Hill West is a single channel (PSB2) service from station number 14930, planned to provide a West regional service from Ridge Hill, station number 14900, towards Cheltenham and Gloucester. Ridge Hill is a six multiplex main station associated with the Central broadcasting region. As Ridge Hill West is a single channel service it does not have 3PSB coverage and as such can not be assigned a DPSA. Even if dummy PSB1 and PSB3 services were created by duplicating Ridge Hill PSB1 and PSB3 coverage and assigning them to Ridge Hill West the DPSA algorithm would assign the service to Ridge Hill as it offers the greatest number of services. A method as with English and Welsh services for protecting at least two stations needs to be introduced into the definition. A similar problem occurs with the DPSA definition with respect to stations with both a vertical and horizontal component. Though both components are radiated from the same station they are assigned different station numbers. Consequently the component that offers the best service is assigned to the DPSA and will be protected. The weaker component will not receive direct protection and may be impacted by an interleaved channel. At Rowridge the vertical component prevails over the horizontal. Protecting Re-broadcast Links The main six multiplexes are broadcast from a little over 1100 sites. 80 of these sites are line fed the majority of the others receiving their programme feed off air from main stations or other stations, the parents, in the distribution chain. These off air feeds, re-broadcast links (RBLs), are an economic way of distributing programmes across the network. Interference to an RBL feed to a station will affect all of the population served by that station. At the location of any station the present definition of the DPSA combined with the planning rules probably does not provide protection for RBLs. The DPSA at the location of the station may not be assigned to the parent and there may not be population at the location. To protect RBLs the DPSA for the location of the station should be forced to the parent of the station and as the planning rules only protect populated location a population should be assigned (1 household) to each station 1. 1 Population is presently based on residential addresses. In future the JPP plan to adopt both residential and business addresses as such transmitting stations should qualify as business addresses. Final Page 12 of 12 16 November 2007