Elin Diamond WHAT ARE YOU READING? EDITED BY EDWARD ZITER

Similar documents
Media Parasites in the Early Avant-Garde

I Can Haz an Internet Aesthetic?!? LOLCats and the Digital Marketplace

Performance Interventions

PEOPLE PLACES AND PLAYS: Theatre That Changed The World

THEATRE 479: DRAMA THEORY AND CRITICISM SPRING 2010; TUESDAYS 1:00 3:50 PM INSTRUCTOR: ALAN SIKES

MAI: FEMINISM & VISUAL CULTURE SUBMISSIONS

Hunter H. Fine, Ph.D. Humboldt State University Syllabus: Communication SOCIAL ADVOCACY THEORY AND PRACTICE

CONTEMPORARY THEATRE PRACTICE

CONTEMPORARY THEATRE PRACTICE

Surrealism and Salvador Dali: Impact of Freudian Revolution. If Sigmund Freud proposed a shift from the common notion of objective reality to

MARXISM AND EDUCATION

Agitated States: Performance in the American Theater of Cruelty Anthony Kubiak The University

Modernism and Morality

Patricia Suzanne Sullivan s Experimental Writing in Composition: Aesthetics and Pedagogies

Practices of Looking is concerned specifically with visual culture, that. 4 Introduction

ARIEL KATZ FACULTY OF LAW ABSTRACT

Holocaust Humor: Satirical Sketches in "Eretz Nehederet"

ANCA E. PARVULESCU. Department of English Washington University Campus Box 1122 St. Louis MO

SOCIOLOGICAL POETICS AND AESTHETIC THEORY

Stenberg, Shari J. Composition Studies Through a Feminist Lens. Anderson: Parlor Press, Print. 120 pages.

Critical Media Theory. Henrik Åhman Department of Informatics and Media

Beethoven and the Quality of Silence Opus 131, Movement 1 by Hanbo Shao. How does one find the inner core of self described by Lawrence Kramer?

Book Review: Gries Still Life with Rhetoric

notes on reading the post-partum document mary kelly

Leering in the Gap: The contribution of the viewer s gaze in creative arts praxis as an extension of material thinking and making

Getting Under the Skin: Body andmedia Theory, Bernadette Wegenstein

Noise, Water, Meat: A History of Sound in the Arts

RUSSIAN DRAMA OF THE REVOLUTIONARY PERIOD

Book review: Men s cinema: masculinity and mise-en-scène in Hollywood, by Stella Bruzzi

What happened in this revolution? It s part of the film -Mutiny on battleship, class conflict.

Comparison of Similarities and Differences between Two Forums of Art and Literature. Kaili Wang1, 2

Valentina Valentini New Theater Made in Italy *

Michael Lüthy Retracing Modernist Praxis: Richard Shiff

Graban, Tarez Samra. Women s Irony: Rewriting Feminist Rhetorical Histories. Southern Illinois UP, pages.

The Ironic Spectator: Solidarity in the Age of Post- Humanitarianism Lilie Chouliaraki

The pattern of all patience Adaptations of Shakespeare s King Lear from Nahum Tate to Howard Barker

What is Social Aesthetics? By Peter Blouw. As a branch of philosophy concerned with the value and meaning of artworks,

Visible Evidence XX Stockholm, Sweden August 15-18, Call for proposals. Experimental Ethnography

Shakespeare and the Players

Children of the Revolution: Avant-Gardes, Intellectuals, and the Holocaust in France

OCAD University Open Research Repository Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences. Suggested citation:

Modern Criticism and Theory A Reader

Psychoanalysis and transmission of the knowledge

Charlotte Brontë: The Novels

Theatre, History, Culture II: Romantics, Realists, and Revolutionaries

Theory or Theories? Based on: R.T. Craig (1999), Communication Theory as a field, Communication Theory, n. 2, May,

Postmodern Narrative Theory

Extreme Beauty: Aesthetics, Politics, Death Edited by James Swearingen and Joanne Cutting-Gray

21L.435 Violence and Contemporary Representation Questions for Paper # 2. Eugenie Brinkema

By John W. Jacobsen. This article first appeared in LF Examiner (September, 2008) Vol 11 No. 8, and is reproduced with permission.

Rock Music in Performance

Loggerhead Sea Turtle

MCCAW, Dick. Bakhtin and Theatre: Dialogues with Stanislavsky, Meyerhold and Grotowski. Abingdon: Routledge, p.

Finding aid for the Filippo Tommaso Marinetti student notebooks and other papers,

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH SPRING 2018 COURSE OFFERINGS

Dialectics for the New Century

Emerging Questions: Fernando F. Segovia and the Challenges of Cultural Interpretation

REQUIRED READINGS ADDITIONAL READINGS WILL BE ADDED AS THE COURSE PROGRESSES

Recent discourse often positions new media as hailing a time of a new avantgarde.

Hunter H. Fine, Ph.D. Humboldt State University Syllabus: Communication SOCIAL ADVOCACY THEORY AND PRACTICE

8 Reportage Reportage is one of the oldest techniques used in drama. In the millenia of the history of drama, epochs can be found where the use of thi

Panel: Starting from Elsewhere. Questions of Transnational, Cross-Cultural Historiography

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at

Theory or Theories? Based on: R.T. Craig (1999), Communication Theory as a field, Communication Theory, n. 2, May,

Introduction and Overview

Critical Spatial Practice Jane Rendell

FEMINIST LEGAL STUDIES: INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS May 2014

Eng 104: Introduction to Literature Fiction

Program General Structure

Drama & Theatre Studies: Wyke Start Summer work

Marxism and. Literature RAYMOND WILLIAMS. Oxford New York OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

Privacy, Playreading, and Women s Closet Drama, (review)

Dafydd Jones (ed.) Dada Culture. Critical Texts on the Avant-Garde Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, Avant-Garde Critical Studies 18, 2006, 327 pp.

Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis

Shapeshifting: Transformations in Native American Art

Significant Differences An Interview with Elizabeth Grosz

Renaissance Old Masters and Modernist Art History-Writing

Source: Anna Pavlova by Valerian Svetloff (1931) Body and Archetype: A few thoughts on Dance Historiography

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

ROLAND BARTHES ON WRITING: LITERATURE IS IN ESSENCE

Review. Discourse and identity. Bethan Benwell and Elisabeth Stokoe (2006) Reviewed by Cristina Ros i Solé. Sociolinguistic Studies

Notes on Gadamer, The Relevance of the Beautiful

The Hegel Marx Connection

Review of Living in an Art World: Reviews and Essays on Dance, Performance, Theater, and the Fine Arts in the 1970s and 1980s by Noel Carroll

Hypatia, Volume 21, Number 3, Summer 2006, pp (Review) DOI: /hyp For additional information about this article

WITCHCRAFT AND MAGIC IN SIXTEENTH- AND SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY EUROPE

Nickelodeon City: Pittsburgh at the Movies, (review)

BRITISH WRITERS AND THE MEDIA,

Gender, the Family and 'The German Ideology'


Credibility and the Continuing Struggle to Find Truth. We consume a great amount of information in our day-to-day lives, whether it is

Film and Media Studies (FLM&MDA)

Opening a Dialogue between Cultural Conservatism and Modernism MICHAELS. ROTH A

The History of Early Cinema

Gender in Postmodern Drama: Is Drama Written Differently by Men and Women?

ART HISTORY. Preparation for the Major. History and Theory of Architecture. Art History (General) Museum and Curatorial Practice.

Concordia Libraries Art History 200 Workshop Part 2. Finding Journal Articles using Databases

Music as the Spectacle: Analysis of the Theme of Music in Soul Music on the Basis of Society of the Spectacle

Louis Althusser s Centrism

BDD-A Universitatea din București Provided by Diacronia.ro for IP ( :46:58 UTC)

Transcription:

Theatre Survey 49:1 (May 2008) 0 2008 American Society for Theatre Research doi: 10.1017/S0040557408000082 WHAT ARE YOU READING? EDITED BY EDWARD ZITER Elin Diamond "This overheated and distasteful little book-for me the wrong book in many ways-addresses matters about which there is, precisely, nothing left to say." The Rutgers University library believed this antihype and never purchased Paul Mann's The Theory-Death of the Avant-Garde (1991), a book so amusingly dour, so relentlessly dialectical, as to be, for me, irresistible. A member of Mike Sell's Vectors of the Avant-Garde seminar at last month's ASTR, I decided really to read instead of skim my Alibris-purchased copy of Mann's distasteful little book. In it the main figures of futurism, dada, and surrealism become a failed or self-recuperating aggregate whose discourse of inflammatory "anti-" stances served only to undermine their revolutionary intentions: "[T]he avant-garde's assaults on tradition, cultural establishments, and the formal structure of the work of art tended to place it in the service of, not... the revolution, but of its deferral, its displacement... The avant-garde's historical agony is grounded in the brutal paradox of an opposition that sustains what it opposes precisely by opposing it" (11).' For lefties who still get recuperation headaches at the theatre, at dance concerts, or at art galleries, much of this book may seem familiar. But for others (and here I include the aforementioned lefties) who imagine that these were the wrong headaches, this book is delectably bitter medicine. Published in 1991, Theory-Death arrived at the end of a decade of ideological theorizing and theorizing about ideology. For literary, performance, and art critics the story of the avant-garde-and I stress, following Mann-the story of the avant-garde's oppositional tactics and their ultimate neutralization and recuperation has Elin Diamond is Professor of English at Rutgers University. She is the author of Unmaking Mimesis: Essays on Feminism and Theater (Routledge, 1997) and Pinter's Comic Play (Bucknell, 1985), and editor of Performance and Cultural Politics (Routledge, 1996). Her essays on drama, performance, and feminist theory have appeared in Theatre Journal, ELH, Discourse, TDR, Modern Drama, Kenyon Review, Art and Cinema, Maska, Cahiers Renaud-Barrault, and in numerous anthologies in the United States, Europe, and India. She is currently at work on a book on modernism and performance and is coeditor with Elaine Aston of the forthcoming The Cambridge Companion to Caryl Churchill. 129

Theatre Survey become an exemplum for understanding how to think about cultural resistance, how to look for the dialectical "germ" as Mann puts it, within avant-garde posturing and proclamations that contaminates the effects of resistance. Mann writes: "the avant-garde is not the victim of recuperation but its agent, its proper technology," and the key term for Mann, as for everyone in that era of theoretical scholarship, is "discourse." For avant-garde discourse is not a matter of movements alone, nor is it some abstract Discourse metonymized by the "Adornos" and "Greenbergs" and "BUrgers" of the scholarly index, nor is it merely a few tangential lies told by Marinetti, Tzara, Breton. The discursive economy circulates works, and in order to circulate these works must have incorporated, in some form the economy's structures and values. Discourse is not extrinsic to the work, it is not an assault on the sanctity of the art object: in its most fundamental and characteristic devices and tropes the poem or painting has already introjected the economic relations that will provide for its recuperation. (92) Underlying this Blau-esque statement-"the death of the avant-garde is its theory and the theory of the avant-garde is its death" (3)-is the protean, all-absorbing nature of theory: that is, discourse. "The death of the avant-garde is not its termination but its most productive voluble, self-conscious and lucrative stage" (3). Fine. But now it's time to argue back... For theatre scholars Mann's plaint sounds decidedly undialectical. There is nothing about the theatrical apparatus that is not redolent of commodity-intensive effect and affect, and this has been true in the West at least since the late sixteenth century, when theatre began to move from court patronage to a freestanding commercial enterprise. One could argue that that date is far too late: Attic drama was, pace Brecht, "theatered down" by the theatre apparatus of Athens. What drama, theatre, and performance bring to Mann's discussion is an already advanced phase of the circulation and recuperation of discursive economies. Theatre history is full of theatrical "love and theft"-stealing the plots, characters, actors, musicians, technical effects, and publicity strategies from one theatre, only to have their appearance in another theatre touted as original. I like to imagine a "Quem quaeritis" performance at Canterbury, remembered and copied-but represented as divinely inspired-by a priest from Gaul upon his return home. Performance has always existed in and through networks of suspicious mutuality, gossip, competition as well as "opposition and alignment" (Mann's ubiquitous terms). Mann is richly evocative in relation to dada's efforts not to, futilely, kick against the commodity but to embrace and then destroy it by destroying its own discourse. Said Kurt Schwitters of Richard Huelsenbeck's German dada: "Huelsendada 'foresees its end and laughs about it"' (quoted in Mann, 83). But Mann shies away from performance within and as discourse. It's always easier to consider the art object in its travels from studio to gallery to museum, noting the ideological investments that shift with each move, than to consider a medium that is constitutively activated by its own disappearance only to instantly reappear as discourse. For the latter reason alone-the ways in which performance is 130

What Are You Reading? surrounded by and saturated by discourse-performance should be his chief case study, especially given the avant-garde artist's will to performance throughout the early decades of the twentieth century. Perhaps Andr6 Breton's eventual loathing of dadaist public pranks in Paris in the 1920s infected critics with a similar anxiety. Writes Mann: "In 1958 Yves Klein exhibited an empty gallery and that vacant space continues to fill discursive passages thirty years later. Edward Lucie-Smith argues that 'Klein is an example of an artist who was important for what he did-the symbolic value of his actions-rather than for what he made.' For many critics this tendency towards gesture remains problematic" (25). At this, a performance scholar can only weep. In performance, what you make IS what you do. And gesture, what Klein did, is the keyword and the bridge that allows the artist to move from the writing tablet or the canvas into the public space-time of performance. See, for example, the description (Mann would say "discourse") produced by Umberto Boccioni, Carlo Carri, Luigi Russolo, Gino Severini, and Giacomo Balla in their Technical Manifesto of Futurist Painting (April 1910). One month earlier they had appeared with Marinetti in a bombastic futurist "evening" at the Teatro Chiarella in Turin, and their public performance found its way into their published manifesto, which in turn infected the paintings they would exhibit one year later, in April 1911. "The gesture for us will no longer be afixed moment of universal dynamism: it will be decisively the dynamic sensation made eternal" [italics in Technical Manifesto]. Dynamic sensation will be transmitted through the painting's "activity" directly to the audience. Wrote Boccioni: "Painting [is] no longer an exterior scene, the setting of a theatrical spectacle... [instead, wrote Ardengo Soffici]: "the spectator [must] live at the center of the painted action.,' 2 The larger question is whether, Artaud-like, "living at the center" of avant-garde performance, then and now, means that we can resist theory-death, the recuperation Mann sees as the contaminating "germ" of all avant-garde production. We might point out that while the gestures of/in performance are conventional and, by extension, commodifiable, they are not strictly translatable. We might insist that there is a necessary gap between embodied gesture and the discourse production it provokes. Is this merely to perpetuate theory-death, to supply more fodder for Mann's chugging dialectical machine? That depends on where we place our machine. Like a good dialectician Mann offers his own conditional reprieve from theory-death: "If art sometimes operates through tacit collusion with discourse and sometimes through futile resistance, sometimes it also pursues a kind of resistance by collusion, a seizure of the means of discourse production" (25). Mann drops the point almost immediately, but the cat is out of the bag. Quite apart from the idea that collusion might equal resistance (a thoroughly 1990s notion, presaged here), let's look at Mann's rhetoric: "Operates," "pursues," "seize[s]"-these naughty verbs of praxis are nestled in Mann's theory-death dialectic, hiding in plain sight. Theatre scholars know that performance never escapes representation, commodification, and thus discourse circulation; but praxis, always theory-haunted, has its own losses, beauties, misses, and scatterings that theory finds, and will always find, difficult to neutralize. Mann knows this and extravagantly silences himself (and artists) at the 131

Theatre Survey end of his book: "The last chapter of the death of the avant-garde is blank" (145). But the vivifying bright red seam of praxis (of making/doing) is everywhere in the sentences of this dark and rigorous book. In spite of itself, an excellent read! ENDNOTES 1. Paul Mann, The Theory-Death of the Avant-Garde (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991), 11. 2. Quoted in RoseLee Goldberg, Performance Art: From Futurism to the Present (New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1988), 13-14. 132

COPYRIGHT INFORMATION TITLE: What Are You Reading? SOURCE: Theatre Surv 49 no1 My 2008 The magazine publisher is the copyright holder of this article and it is reproduced with permission. Further reproduction of this article in violation of the copyright is prohibited. To contact the publisher: http://www.inform.umd.edu/edres/colleges/arhu/depts/theatre/person nel/cschuler/astr/