UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Similar documents
Case 3:16-cv K Document 36 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID 233

Case 1:10-cv LFG-RLP Document 1 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case5:14-cv HRL Document1 Filed01/15/14 Page1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 18 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:18-cv RMB-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 44 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Attorney for Plaintiff Visual Effect Innovations, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 23 Page ID#: 1

Case 3:18-cv K Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 33 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:19-cv wks Document 1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

Deadline.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA COMPLAINT

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:16-cv LS Document 40 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.

Case 2:17-cv DDP-AGR Document 82 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1742

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 1:15-cv LJA Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Case 1:08-cv DC Document Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 27 EXHIBIT A

ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Complaint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. Recitals

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER FOR UNITED STATES PATENT NUMBER 5,283,819

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner. ROVI GUIDES, INC. Patent Owner

Paper 21 Tel: Entered: July 14, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/17 Page 1 of 21

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. SPORTVISION, INC, Plaintiff. v. SPORTSMEDIA TECHNOLOGY CORP, Defendant.

SAG-AFTRA COMMERCIALS INFOMERCIAL ONE PRODUCTION ONLY ( OPO ) INFOMERCIAL LETTER OF AGREEMENT 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 1:16-cv KMM ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

SESAC LOCAL TELEVISION DIGITAL MULTIPLEX CHANNEL LICENSE AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. Petitioner. ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC Patent Owner

Case 6:12-cv MHS-CMC Document 1700 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 24335

Case 3:15-cv EMC Document 35 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 30

Paper Entered: April 14, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Ford v. Panasonic Corp

Paper Entered: December 14, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Data Sheet of SAW Components

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/12/16 Page 1 of 30. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

The Jon Vickers Film Scoring Award 2017/2019 Entry Form and Agreement

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; Petitioner

Patent Reissue. Devan Padmanabhan. Partner Dorsey & Whitney, LLP

Charles T. Armstrong, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, McLean, VA, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM. TRIBUNE TELEVISION COMPANY (COMPANY) WXIN/WTTV (STATION) Indianapolis, IN (DESIGNATED MARKET AREA)

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/16 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Plaintiff, Speedee Distribution, LLC ( Plaintiff or Speedee ), by its attorneys, brings this

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATENT LAW. Randy Canis

MARK OF EXCELLENCE INFORMATION PACKET 2016

Obsolete Product(s) - Obsolete Product(s)

WEBSITE LOOK DRESS DRESSING TRADE EEL : RESSING? T I M O T H Y S. D E J O N G N A D I A H. D A H A B

AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE USE OF LITERARY AND DRAMATIC WORKS FOR RADIO AS EXTRACTS/POEM

Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 9,253,452 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

DM DiagMon Architecture

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. VSR INDUSTRIES, INC. Petitioner

Participation Agreement Legal Document

STEVAL-CCM003V1. Graphic panel with ZigBee features based on the STM32 and SPZBE260 module. Features. Description

ADVANCED PATENT ISSUES AND ACCELERATED EXAMINATION. Presented by: Theodore Wood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARRIS Solutions Inc. TERMS OF USE ARRIS SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,462,508 B1. Wang et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 8, 2002

SUMMIT LAW GROUP PLLC 315 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1000 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON Telephone: (206) Fax: (206)

o VIDEO A United States Patent (19) Garfinkle u PROCESSOR AD OR NM STORE 11 Patent Number: 5,530,754 45) Date of Patent: Jun.

SEC ANALOG SPECTRUM RECOVERY: FIRM DEADLINE.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IPPV ENTERPRISES, LLC, and MAAST, Inc, Plaintiffs. v. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORP.; NagraVision, S.A.; and NagraStar, L.L.C, Defendants.

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/20/15 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ARTICLE 23. OTHER USES OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO Office of the Chief Justice DIRECTIVE CONCERNING COURT APPOINTMENTS OF DECISION-MAKERS PURSUANT TO , C.R.S.

Aventine Press Print-on-Demand Publishing Services 55 E Emerson Street, Chula Vista, CA 91911

Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,144,182 Paper No. 1. MICROSOFT CORPORATION Petitioner, BISCOTTI INC.

AMENDED MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE BRINGING OF A CLASS ACTION AND TO ASCRIBE THE STATUS OF REPRESENTATIVE (Art C.C.P.

Licensing & Regulation #379

X X X Ad in printed event guide Full Page ½ Page ¼ Page Option to purchase additional sponsorship items

Regulation No. 6 Peer Review

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING, INC. (COMPANY) WHP/WLYH (STATION) HARRISBURG, PA (MARKET)

Paper Entered: August 28, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 05/07/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2018

Appeal decision. Appeal No France. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan

Transcription:

Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1 Patrick J. Cerillo, Esq. Patrick J. Cerillo, LLC 4 Walter Foran Blvd., Suite 402 Flemington, NJ 08822 Attorney ID No: 01481-1980 T: (908) 284-0997 F: (908) 284-0915 pjcerillolaw@comcast.net Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY HAWK TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS,LLC, v. Plaintiff, ST.JOSEPH S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Civil Action No. COMPLAINT - ACTION FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Hawk Technology Systems, LLC ( Hawk ), hereby sues St. Joseph s Healthcare System, Inc. ( SJHS ), and alleges: 1

Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 2 of 9 PageID: 2 NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a civil action for patent infringement of United States Patent No. RE43,462 ( 462 Patent). The 462 Patent is a reissue of United States Patent No. 5,625,410 (the 410 Patent). The independent claims in the reissued 462 Patent are substantially identical to the corresponding claims in the original 410 Patent. 2. The abstract for the 462 Patent states: A PC-based system for monitoring and storing representative images from video cameras which may be utilized for security or other monitoring applications. Camera inputs from digital or analog sources are individually and independently digitized and displayed at a first set of image sizes, sampling rates, and frame rates, and may be stored in digital form on various recording media at a second set of image sizes, sampling rates, and frame rates, and these two sets of sizes and rates may or may not be identical. Provisions are included for adding detection or alarm systems which will automatically alter image size, sampling rate and/or frame rate of an individual input source, or activate other physical responses. In addition to security system monitoring, further applications of the invention are disclosed for process monitoring in manufacturing environments and also for applications in videoconferencing. PARTIES 3. Hawk is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida and maintains its principal place of business at 2 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 3800, Miami, Florida 33131. 2

Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 3 of 9 PageID: 3 4. SJHS is a non-profit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of New Jersey with its principal business address located at 703 Main Street, Paterson, New Jersey 07503. 5. SJHS s registered agent is Francine Halushka Katz, Esq. located at 703 Main Street, Paterson, New Jersey 07503. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a), this Court has original jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action because this is an action arising under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et. seq. 7. This court has personal jurisdiction over SJHS because SJHS (a) operates, conducts, engages in and/or or carries on a business in the State of New Jersey; (b) committed tortious acts within the State of New Jersey; and (c) is engaging in substantial and not isolated activity within the State of New Jersey. 8. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b), venue is proper in this district. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 9. Hawk Technology Systems was formed in 2012 to commercialize the inventions of its founder, Barry Schwab. 10. Mr. Ken Washino and Mr. Schwab invented what is claimed by the '462 Patent. 3

Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 4 of 9 PageID: 4 11. Mr. Washino and Mr. Schwab have collaborated on a number of other pioneering inventions resulting in patents in the areas of video archiving, video downloading and digital cinema. 12. Mr. Schwab also is a named inventor on more than thirty patents, ranging from consumer products to secure network computing. 13. Hawk is the exclusive owner of all rights, title, and interest in the 462 Patent, including the right to exclude others and to enforce, sue and recover damages for past and future infringement thereof. 14. Hawk became the owner of all rights, title, and interest in the 462 Patent by virtue of an assignment from Multi-Format, Inc., a New Jersey corporation ( MFI ). 15. MFI obtained its rights, title, and interest in the 462 Patent by virtue of an assignment from Messrs. Washino and Schwab. Claim 1 Of The '462 Patent 16. Claim 1 of the '462 patent states: A video storage and display system, comprising: one or more video cameras, each outputting a signal representative of a video image; means to receive the signals from each camera and digitally compress the images; two forms of high-capacity storage media, one being randomly searchable while the other continues to store the digitally compressed image; and 4

Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 5 of 9 PageID: 5 a computer configured to receive the digitally compressed images, the computer being interfaced to the following devices: a display screen, means to receive externally derived operator commands, and the high-capacity storage media, and wherein the computer is programmed to perform the following functions: display the digitally compressed images from the cameras in different windows on the display screen, each window being associated with an update rate and dimensions in pixels, vary the spatial parameters and temporal parameters at which a particular image is updated in its window in accordance with one of the externally derived commands, store the digitally compressed images in the high-capacity storage media, and vary the spatial parameters and temporal parameters at which a particular image is stored in accordance with one of the externally derived commands. ('462 Patent, Col. 10, line 57 Col. 11, line 20). Claim 12 Of The '462 Patent 17. Claim 12 of the '462 patent states: The method of simultaneously displaying and storing multiple video images, comprising the steps of: receiving video images at a personal computer based system from one or more sources; digitizing any of the images not already in digital form using an analog-todigital converter; 5

Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 6 of 9 PageID: 6 displaying at least certain of the digitized images in separate windows on a personal computer based display device, using a first set of temporal and spatial parameters associated with each image in each window; converting one or more of the video source images into a data storage format using a second set of temporal and spatial parameters associated with each image; and simultaneously storing the converted images in a storage device. ('462 Patent, Col. 11, line 62 Col. 12, line 10). Claim 15 Of The '462 Patent 18. Claim 15 of the '462 patent states: A video storage and display system, comprising: one or more video cameras, each outputting a signal representative of a video image; means to receive the signals from each camera and digitally compress the images; and a computer configured to receive the digitally compressed images, the computer being interfaced to the following devices: a display screen, means to receive externally derived operator commands including means for sensing a deviation from the normal-state image scene associated with at least one of the video cameras, the existence of the deviation being used as the basis for generating an externally derived command, and a high-capacity storage medium, and programmed to perform the following functions: 6

Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 7 of 9 PageID: 7 display the digitally compressed images from the cameras in different windows on the display screen, each window being associated with an update rate and dimensions in pixels, vary spatial parameters and temporal parameters at which a particular image is updated in its window in accordance with one of the externally derived commands, store the digitally compressed images in the high-capacity storage medium, and vary the spatial parameters and temporal parameters at which a particular image is stored in accordance with one of the externally derived commands. ('462 Patent, Col. 12, line 15 45). 19. By reviewing publically available information, including the article attached hereto as Exhibit A, Hawk learned that SJHS used a video storage and display system and methods that infringed the 462 Patent. 20. Hawk has prepared a claim chart which explains how each limitation reads onto the system claimed by Claims 1 and 15 and the method claimed by Claim 12 of the 462 Patent. At least each of these three claims was infringed. waived. 21. All conditions precedent to bringing this action have occurred or been 22. Hawk has retained counsel to represent it in this matter and is obligated to pay its counsel a reasonable fee for its services. fees. 23. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285, Hawk is entitled to recover its attorneys 7

Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 8 of 9 PageID: 8 COUNT I: DIRECT INFRINGEMENT OF THE 462 PATENT 24. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1-23 above are hereby realleged as if fully set forth herein. 25. Without Hawk s authorization, SJHS used a video storage and display system and/or methods that infringed one or more of the claims in the 462 Patent. 26. Hawk has been damaged by SJHS s infringement. WHEREFORE, Hawk respectfully requests the Court: A. Enter a judgment finding that St. Joseph s Healthcare System, Inc. has directly infringed the 462 Patent. B. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, order St. Joseph s Healthcare System, Inc. to pay damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention, together with interest and costs; C. Find this to be an exceptional case of patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. 285 and award reasonable attorneys fees, costs, and expenses incurred by Plaintiffs in prosecuting this action; and D. Award such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. 8

Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 9 of 9 PageID: 9 Dated: December 16, 2014 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Patrick J. Cerillo Patrick J. Cerillo, Esq. Patrick J. Cerillo, LLC 4 Walter Foran Blvd., Suite 402 Flemington, NJ 08822 T: (908) 284-0997 F: (908) 284-0915 pjcerillolaw@comcast.net Attorneys for Plaintiff 9