Application Note. Using Hitch Standardization on a Series of Color Measuring Instruments AN

Similar documents
Application Note. Validation of the EP European Pharmacopoeia Color Scale AN

MSEZ User s Manual. Hunter Associates Laboratory Sunset Hills Road Reston, Virginia USA

Cie L*48.57 a* b* Covering the World. Solutions for paint and coatings color management

Cie L*55 a* b* Keeping Color in Fashion. Solutions for textile color consistency

User Calibration Software. CM-S20w. Instruction Manual. Make sure to read this before use.

LED Lighting for Critical Color Judgement Lessons from 8 Years in the Field

DISPLAY WEEK 2015 REVIEW AND METROLOGY ISSUE

Color measurement and calibration of professional display devices

The need for Encircled Flux, real or imaginary?

6 3 0 N M, S I N G L E M O D E F U S E D F I B E R O P T I C C OUPLERS / TA P S

Alternative Fiber Coupler Options

Power saving in LCD panels

Colorimeters and UV/Visible Spectrophotometers. from

Selected Problems of Display and Projection Color Measurement

Calibration of Colour Analysers

An Introduction to TrueSource

Background Statement for SEMI Draft Document 5291A New Standard: TEST METHOD OF AMBIENT COLOR GAMUT FOR FPD UNDER INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS

LCD and Plasma display technologies are promising solutions for large-format

READ THIS FIRST. Morphologi G3. Quick Start Guide. MAN0412 Issue1.1

COLORBOX - ILLUMINATED ASSESSMENT CABINETS VF0600, VF1200

semi-automated scanning

Achieve Accurate Critical Display Performance With Professional and Consumer Level Displays

Report of Test LLIA

Color Reproduction Complex

Interface Practices Subcommittee SCTE STANDARD SCTE Composite Distortion Measurements (CSO & CTB)

Teaching Plasma Nanotechnologies Based on Remote Access

Color Manual VOLUME 1 OCTOBER 2017

DRAFT. Proposal to modify International Standard IEC

Remote Director and NEC LCD3090WQXi on GRACoL Coated #1

Color Matching Systems

specification display applications cronus spectrometer & colorimeter

Visual Color Matching under Various Viewing Conditions

Presentation Monitoring Solutions. Curolux

ABB MEASUREMENT & ANALYTICS. MB3000 The most reliable FT-IR laboratory analyzer

RF (Wireless) Fundamentals 1- Day Seminar

AEROTRAK PORTABLE AIRBORNE PARTICLE COUNTER MODEL 9110 QUICK START GUIDE

RTPGE Prototype Channel & Alien Test Results

ABB MEASUREMENT & ANALYTICS. MB3600 The most reliable FT-NIR laboratory analyzer designed for QA/QC

Case Study Meeting Demand with Automation: Luminator Aerospace Ramps Up Backlit Sign Testing Using ProMetric Imaging Colorimeters

ISO/IEC TR TECHNICAL REPORT

Machine Vision System for Color Sorting Wood Edge-Glued Panel Parts

Accurate Colour Reproduction in Prepress

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION :1 Video (De) Mux with Data Channel

The New X-Rite Standard for Graphic Arts

Image Contrast Enhancement (ICE) The Defining Feature. Author: J Schell, Product Manager DRS Technologies, Network and Imaging Systems Group

specification MSE series MSE and MSE+ colorimeter

Setup Guide. SpectraCal C6 HDR2000 Colorimeter. Rev. 1.2

technical note flicker measurement display & lighting measurement

TROJANUVTORRENTTM. Drinking Water Disinfection

Press Publications CMC-99 CMC-141

InSight Pro. Valuable real-time process insight

NVLAP LAB CODE LM Test Report. For. LIGHT EFFICIENT DESIGN (Brand Name:N/A) 188 S. Northwest Highway Cary, IL

ZX-44XL Liquid Fuel Analyzer. User s Manual Version 1.2

More reliable zeta potential measurements. without dilution. Agilent Particle Analysis Solutions. Agilent 7020 ZetaProbe Zeta Potential Analyzer

Practicality and Performance

Comparison of SONY ILX511B CCD and Hamamatsu S10420 BT-CCD for VIS Spectroscopy

NVLAP LAB CODE LM Test Report. For. LIGHT EFFICIENT DESIGN (Brand Name:N/A) 188 S. Northwest Highway Cary, IL

SUMMARY OF THE METHOD SAMPLE PREPARATION

Artisan Technology Group is your source for quality new and certified-used/pre-owned equipment

Cree Engineering Services Testing Laboratory (CESTL) Photometric Testing and Evaluation Report

Cree Engineering Services Testing Laboratory (CESTL) Photometric Testing and Evaluation Report

Choosing the Right Machine Vision Applications

ZOOM LED Spot. Market leading colour control and future proofed functionality with simplicity of use Designed and built in the UK

Ultrospec 1100 pro. Description. UV/visible spectrophotometer. data file. UV/Visible Spectrophotometry. product code: see ordering information

M4000 Diagnostic Test System For Power Apparatus Condition Assessment

Digital Audio Design Validation and Debugging Using PGY-I2C

LED TEST. ATX Hardware GmbH West and Feasa Enterprises Limited a long-standing partnership. SPECIALIST FIXTURE SOLUTIONS

Application Note: Using the Turner Designs Model 10-AU Fluorometer to Perform Flow Measurements in Sanitary Sewers by Dye Dilution

DLP Discovery Reliability Application Note

Avoiding False Pass or False Fail

Silicon PhotoMultiplier Kits

NVLAP LAB CODE LM Test Report. For GREEN INOVA LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) LTD. (Brand Name: GI LED LIGHTING)

NVLAP LAB CODE LM Test Report. For LED PANEL LIGHTING CO.,LTD. (Brand Name: N/A)

Certificate of Calibration

Fluorescence Spectrophotometer

V9A01 Solution Specification V0.1

LED Floodlight RoHS. Model: inner box: L273*W240*H165mm master carton: L549*W485*H175mm 4PCS

NVLAP LAB CODE LM Test Report. For CE INNOVATIONS LTD. (Brand Name: IRICO) 911 Denison St Markham, ON L3R 3K4 Canada

Calibrating attenuators using the 9640A RF Reference

Paper for Consideration by the Digital Information Portrayal Working Group (DIPWG) Comment about recommendation on S-52 Colour Calibration Procedure

CCD 143A 2048-Element High Speed Linear Image Sensor

Features 1.0 MIN. CATHODE LEAD. Sq Typ 0.50 ±0.10

LM-79 Test Report. Relevant Standards IES LM IES TM CIE Product SKU. Blaze Basics 200 LED Tapelight DI-12V-BLBSC2-27-***

LM-79 Test Report. Relevant Standards IES LM IES TM CIE Product SKU. Blaze Basics 200 LED Tapelight DI-12V-BLBSC2-50-***

Barco Smart Laser - High performance cinema projection

Report of Test LLIA A-R01*

ENGINEERING COMMITTEE Interface Practices Subcommittee AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD ANSI/SCTE Composite Distortion Measurements (CSO & CTB)

Full Product Catalog. truelight truecolor

Color Codes of Optical Fiber and Color Shade Measurement Standards in Optical Fiber Cables

HIGH SPEED ASYNCHRONOUS DATA MULTIPLEXER/ DEMULTIPLEXER FOR HIGH DENSITY DIGITAL RECORDERS

PRODUCT GUIDE CEL5500 LIGHT ENGINE. World Leader in DLP Light Exploration. A TyRex Technology Family Company

Datasheet. High-Performance airmax Bridge. Models: PBE-M5-620, PBE-M5-400, PBE-M5-300, PBE-M Uniform Beamwidth Maximizes Noise Immunity

APM CALIBRATION PROCEDURE Rev. A June 3, 2015

From light to color: how design choices make the difference

Colorimetric Characterization of Three Computer Displays (LCD and CRT) Jason E. Gibson and Mark D. Fairchild January, 2000

More Info at Open Access Database Process Control for Computed Tomography using Digital Detector Arrays

721N Spectrophotometer. Operating Manual

Technical Progress Report. Third Quarter DEVELOPMENT OF A VIDEO-BASED SLURRY SENSOR FOR ON-LINE ASH ANALYSIS. Principal Investigators

LightLab I N T E R N A T I O N A L

4X70 PROFINET SYSTEM

Transcription:

Application Note AN 1018.00 Using Hitch Standardization on a Series of Color Measuring Instruments Abstract One challenge in color measurement is the communication of color between locations or to a customer. Hitch standardization is a process by which two or more instruments of similar design can be made to read the same color values on a group of specimens. This process is very useful in expanding the communications of color around the world or between vendor and customer. This application note considers the technique and mathematical calculations for Hitch Standardization.

Using Hitch Standardization on a Series of Color Measuring Instruments AN 1018.00 2 challenge: To maximize inter-instrument agreement Inter-instrument agreement is actually quite a complex topic and to maximize inter-instrument agreement, measurement parameters need to be standardized for all instruments in the set. These six parameters include: Color scale being reported CIE illuminant CIE standard observer Instrument type, geometry, standardization mode Sample Preparation Method of presenting the sample to the instrument When any one or more of these parameters is changed, the resulting color values change. The best inter-instrument agreement in terms of absolute color values will always be found using the same model of instrument from the same manufacturer with all of the six parameters matching at all sites. Consider a company with a ColorFlex 45/0 at one plant (Facility A) and a D25A DP-9000 at another plant (Facility B). Each facility is reading powder samples and comparing the color values to an absolute color specification. The table below shows the six parameters for the two plants. Table 1. Comparison of Instruments at Facility A & B No. Parameter Facility A Facility B Comparison 1 Color Scale CIE L*a*b* CIE L*a*b* Match 2 Illuminant D65 C MisMatch 3 Observer 10 2 MisMatch 4 Instrument Configuration ColorFlex, circumferential 45 /0, xenon flash lamp, reflectance D25A, bidirectional 45 /0, tungsten lamp, reflectance MisMatch 5 Sample Preparation Dry sample for 8 hours and grind to fine powder with no lumps Dry sample for 8 hours and grind to fine powder with no lumps Match 6 Sample Presentation Scoop into glass sample cup and read once through glass bottom of cup Press into a smooth plaque and measure once at open sample port with port down MisMatch In comparing the parameters for the two facilities, the following changes will make them correlate as closely as possible. 1. Color Scale - The color scales agree in the above table which is a good start. 2. Illuminant - The illuminants do not match and since only the C illuminant is available for the D25A, C should be used at both facilities. 3. Observer - The observers do not match. Since only the 2 observer is available for the colorimeter, the 2 Observer should be used at both plants. 4. Instrument Configuration - The models are not the same. Both have a 45 /0 geometry, through the means of illumination and the type of lamp are slightly different. If the two instruments have already been purchased, we will not be able to completely standardize this parameter. If we were starting from scratch, we would choose one instrument model or the other and purchase the same for both plants. 5. Sample Preparation - The same for both plants. 6. Sample Presentation - No match. However, Facility A recommends that pressing a plaque is too time consuming, so plant B will switch to the sample cup presentation method.

Using Hitch Standardization on a Series of Color Measuring Instruments AN 1018.00 3 Other instrument capabilities, such as varying port sizes, UV filters, and light sources, should be welldefined and as standardized as possible for all the instruments. Similarities between the instruments should be maximized for the best results. Once these parameters agree as much as possible, the next step is to establish how different the readings are at the two plants. A single standard is sent around as a round robin standard and read on both instruments. If the new readings between sites are not acceptable, there are three options for reconciling the problem: 1. Establish a New Tolerance. Read a physical product standard on each instrument and establish a new tolerance specification based on differences from that product standard. Instruments of the same geometry should agree on difference values from a physical standard, even if they don t agree exactly on absolute color values. See Application Note No.1019 for more information on Tolerancing. 2. Separate the Color Specification for each instrument. Establish a separate absolute color specification for each instrument/site by reading acceptable, borderline, and out-of-spec samples of your product (as established visually) on each instrument. See Application Note No.1019 for more information on Tolerancing. 3. Hitch Standardization. This is recommended for absolute value measurement once the six parameters are in agreement as much as possible. Note that hitching is not recommended for instruments with different geometries. The Basic Technique of Hitch Standardization The process of hitch standardization also known as transfer standardization involves assigning one instrument to be the reference, or master, unit and mathematically adjusting the secondary, or slave, unit(s) to read the same values. In this way, two or more instruments can be hitched together. Hitching a secondary unit to a reference instrument requires that a specimen be read on both units and the values compared and adjusted accordingly. This specimen, known as the hitch standard, is first read on the reference instrument and its values recorded as spectral data or colorimetric (tristrimulus) data. The hitch standard is then physically moved to the secondary instrument where it is reread and the values from the reference unit are input into the secondary instrument s processor. Table 2. Before & After HitcH Instrument L* a* b* Reference Instrument 51 51 51 Secondary Before Hitch Standardization 50 50 50 Secondary After Hitch Standardization 51 51 51 Secondary Unit #1 Reference Instrument Hitch Hitch Hitch Secondary Unit #2 Secondary Unit #3 Here s a simple example: Reference instrument was used to read a standard. It was then hitched to another instrument and the standard was read again. The values read on the reference instrument are shown in Table 1 and the results as expected indicate that the readings after hitch standardization are closer to the reference instrument readings than before hitch standardization. In general, hitch standardization is useful for localized areas of color space, i.e. 5 units or less. Due to the visual non-uniformity of the color scales, it is recommended that each distinct color be assigned a separate hitch standard. This will improve the reproducibility of the measurements between the reference and secondary units.

Using Hitch Standardization on a Series of Color Measuring Instruments AN 1018.00 4 The calculations Through firmware or software, the secondary unit is biased to the reference unit using either an additive or a ratio calculation, as shown below. BIAS (Additive) Calculation: Hitched Sample Value = Unhitched Sample Value + Hitch Bias Hitch Bias = Assigned Standard Value Measured Standard Value. RATIO (Scalar) Calculation: Hitched Sample Value = Unhitched Sample Value * Hitch Ratio Hitch Ratio = Assigned Standard Value/ Measured Standard Value For the Reference example cited above, the following BIAS calculations apply: L*: 51 = 50 + Hitch Bias; Hitch Bias = 1.0 a*: 51 = 50 + Hitch Bias; Hitch Bias = 1.0 b*: 51 = 50 + Hitch Bias; Hitch Bias = 1.0 For measurements made using RATIO calculations: L*: 51 = 50 * Hitch Ratio; Hitch Ratio = 51.00/50.00 = 1.02 a*: 51 = 50 * Hitch Ratio; Hitch Ratio = 51.00/50.00 = 1.02 b*: 51 = 50 * Hitch Ratio; Hitch Ratio = 51.00/50.00 = 1.02 Note that the bias type of hitch is preferable for dark colors and when the samples to be measured are very close in color to the hitch standard. Ratio hitches tend to be more robust. Choosing the Best instrumentation The best hitch results are obtained when the instrument set contains units of similar geometry. This means that hitched instruments should all have either diffuse or directional geometry and that these differing geometries are not combined in a hitch. When using a combination of colorimeters and spectrophotometers (sometimes referred to as spectrocolorimeters) in the hitch network, it is recommended that a spectrophotometer (such as a ColorQuest, LabScan, or UltraScan), rather than a colorimeter (ColorTrend HT or D25), serve as the reference unit. This makes the most of the spectrophotometer s ability to measure across the entire visual spectrum and takes advantage of the tightness in readings that can be achieved within a population of spectrophotometers. In the case where all spectrophotometers or all colorimeters are being used for the hitch, the reference unit can be selected at random. It is recommended that the reference unit be placed in a central laboratory where performance can be monitored on a regular basis. Some spectrocolorimeters have the additional ability to perform a hitch based on each point of spectral data, which means you can then view the hitched data under any color scale, and observer. Tristimulus hitches limit your data viewing capabilities to the illuminant and observer conditions under which the hitch was created. For specific instrument operation instructions, refer to your instrument user s manual. Selecting a Hitch Standard There are many cases where multiple copies of the hitch standard are unavailable or the stability of the specimen is in question. For these cases, a material of the same color with the following characteristics would be ideal: Readily-available quantity Uniform surface Stable over time Non-metameric to the sample Non-photochromic Non-thermochromic A good example of a commonly-used and stable hitch standard is a ceramic tile. This type of standard can easily be sent to the various locations of the secondary instruments after being read on the reference unit.

Using Hitch Standardization on a Series of Color Measuring Instruments AN 1018.00 5 Preparation of a Secondary Hitch Standard In the case where the color of the hitch standard will change over time, care must be taken to ensure optimum shipping conditions and quick use of the hitch standard. Once the hitch standard is read on the secondary instrument to establish the initial hitch, a secondary standard should be chosen for use in routine product evaluation. This secondary standard should be a more stable material that can be used to re-establish the hitch as needed. The secondary hitch standard procedure is used, for example, in the determination of United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) grade color for tomato products. The instrument network is composed of directional colorimeters that are hitched together to the reference instrument at USDA via an actual tomato paste sample. This soft standard is prepared and read on each secondary instrument, and the assigned values from the reference unit are entered into each unit. Since the standard is biodegradable, its shelf-life in an open container is relatively short. Therefore, the next step is to read a red ceramic tile, the tomato tile, relative to this hitch. When the tomato tile is read on each secondary instrument with the soft standard hitch in place, the values obtained become the new assigned values from the reference instrument. The secondary instrument can then be rehitched using the tomato tile in the future rather than the soft standard. The tomato tile becomes the secondary hitch standard. It is checked periodically against a new soft standard. Instrument Performance and Hitch Standardization Each instrument should be standardized prior to working with a hitch standard to ensure robustness of the data. Periodic restandardization should be done per the individual instrument recommendations. Each hitch standard or product standard should be reread and compared to itself as a sample on a routine basis to ensure confidence in the hitch calculations. In addition, a checking program should be implemented for evaluating the performance of the hitch standardization on each secondary unit for each color relative to the reference instrument. A set of stable specimens that could be read on each instrument and compared would serve as a check on the program. Changes in the hardware on any reference or secondary unit will affect the assignment of hitch factors. It is recommended that routine diagnostics be performed on each unit in the network to ensure proper maintenance. Refer to specific diagnostic routines described in your User s Manual. Maintenance of the instruments (i.e., replacement of the lamp or preventative maintenance work by a service technician), followed by rereading of the instrument standards and the hitch standards are recommended on a scheduled basis. Summary of Hitch Standardization Procedure 1. Check the 6 method parameters and get them to match. 2. Choose the reference instrument and the specimens to be used as hitch standards. Each color should have its own hitch standard for best results. Each secondary unit should have its own set of hitch standards. 3. Label each standard for easy identification. 4. Standardize the reference unit using its calibrated instrument tiles. Read each hitch standard on the reference unit and record the data. If tristimulus data is being obtained, record the standard observer and illuminant. Note that use of a colorimeter as a reference or secondary unit will require the use of Illuminant C and the 2 standard observer. If spectral data is being used, write down or print the 10 nm data for the entire measurement range of the instrument.

Using Hitch Standardization on a Series of Color Measuring Instruments AN 1018.00 6 5. Forward the hitch standards and the recorded hitch data to each secondary unit location. 6. Read the instructions for hitch standardization in the User s Manual for the secondary instrument. Set up this instrument to read the same color scale, illuminant, standard observer, etc. as the hitch data from the reference instrument. Standardize the secondary instrument using its own calibrated tiles. 7. Following the specific instrument procedures, read the hitch standard on the secondary unit. When prompted, input the values from the reference unit. The computer or processor will then determine the hitch offset, and the instrument is ready for sample analysis. 8. If you plan to use a secondary hitch standard, read the secondary standard as a sample. Record the values read for this standard with the hitch implemented. These values will now serve as the assigned values from the reference instrument. The instrument can now be rehitched using this secondary standard. 9. Implement a check program to evaluate the hitch for each secondary unit relative to the reference instrument. References ASTM E1455, Standard Practice for Obtaining Colorimetric Data from a Visual Display Unit Using Tristimulus Colorimeters. Berns, Roy S., Billmeyer and Saltzman s Principles of Color Technology, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000. More Information about Color Measurement on our HunterLab Blog measuretruecolor.com About Hunterlab HunterLab, the first name in color measurement, provides ruggedly dependable, consistently accurate, and cost effective color measurement solutions. With over 6 decades of experience in more than 65 countries, HunterLab applies leading edge technology to measure and communicate color simply and effectively. The company offers both diffuse/8 and a complete line of true 45º/0º optical geometry instruments in portable, bench-top and production in-line configurations. HunterLab, the world s true measure of color. Hunterlab 2012 Hunter Associates Laboratory Inc., 11491 Sunset Hills Road, Reston, VA 20190-5280 USA helpdesk@hunterlab.com www.hunterlab.com