TALKING SOCIAL TV 2: FOLLOW-UP ANALYSIS June 2014

Similar documents
Talking Social TV 2. Ed Keller. Beth Rockwood. SVP, Discovery Communications & Chair, CRE Social Media Committee. CEO Keller Fay Group

TALKING SOCIAL TV 2 April 10, 2014

Syndication April 2006

Digital Day 2016 Overview of findings

2018 READER SURVEY REPORT READERS ON READING

Media Comparisons 2012 Persons

Signal Survey Summary. submitted by Nanos to Signal Leadership Communication Inc., July 2018 (Submission )


THE ROLE OF AUDIO IN THE SPORTS VIEWING EXPERIENCE AUDIO PRODUCTION & DISTRIBUTION WORKSHOP DECEMBER 11, 2017

Tranformation of Scholarly Publishing in the Digital Era: Scholars Point of View

Video over the Internet Can we break the Net? CBS Interactive

PSB Annual Report 2015 PSB Audience Opinion Annex. Published July 2015

STAYING INFORMED ACROSS THE GARDEN STATE WHERE DO YOU GO AND WHAT DO YOU KNOW?

2016 Cord Cutter & Cord Never Study

Annex 3.ii PSB audience opinions PSB Channel 4 and ITV portfolio channels research. PSB Annual Report December 2014

CABLE NATION: Summer 2014 No Vacation for Cable SOCIAL TV TIME SPENT CONTACT US

Cool Off With Premium Video Content: How Viewers are Beating The Heat During Summer Months

Sorenson Spark Delivers Insights. Case Study Understanding promo effectiveness and attribution

CONQUERING CONTENT EXCERPT OF FINDINGS

NETWORK PRIMETIME & OTT PROGRAMMING Flash #5-15 November 2017

PSB Review 2008 Research findings

Where Are They Now? A Follow-up To Our Breaking News Story. August 2015

BBC Trust Review of the BBC s Speech Radio Services

Exploring Millennials Meaningful Relationship With TV Programming

News-social media poll Stockton Polling Institute Feb , 2017 Weighted frequencies

B - PSB Audience Impact. PSB Report 2013 Information pack August 2013

Editorial Calendar 2018 EDITORIAL: Amy Maclean

The Communications Market: Digital Progress Report

D PSB Audience Impact. PSB Report 2011 Information pack June 2012

Sells Middle School Orchestras 150 West Bridge Street Dublin, OH 43017

COMMUNITY NEEDS & INTERESTS QUESTIONNAIRE

7 DAYS IN HAVANA Case Study

DSTV, MNET AND SUPERSPORT PROMO RATES

Context The broadcast landscape

What Impact Will Over-the-Top Video Have on My Bottom Line

TV Today. Lose Small, Win Smaller. Rating Change Distribution Percent of TV Shows vs , Broadcast Upfronts 1

Contents. DVR Penetration Ethnic Penetration...4. DVR v. Non-DVR Time Spent With DVR Time Spent By Demo...9

5INSIGHTS TO KNOW CONTENT MATTERS IDEAS IMPACTING THE CONTENT COMMUNITY 2016 Q3 ISSUE #2. 1. Setting the Schedule - Some insights on pilot testing

The ABC and the changing media landscape

WBNS 10TV Media Kit. Columbus, OH Market

Nielsen Examines TV Viewers to the Political Conventions. September 2008

Version 1.0. General Certificate of Secondary Education Practice Paper Set 4. Mathematics (Linear) B. Paper 1 Foundation Tier 4365/1F.

CABLE NATION: Video Advertising Update

U.S. Satellite Television

TV 2016 Beyond Summits

Contents Penetration of Technology Television is ubiquitous Slide 4 Australians love their TV

Brighton Fringe 2016 Package. The Package

National Survey Results

QuickPlay Media US Mobile TV and Video Survey 2011 Summary

Northern Dakota County Cable Communications Commission ~

THE AGE OF TELEVISION

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 2. SECTION 1: Executive Summary 3-6. SECTION 2: Where do people get news and how?..7-11

What is this and why is it on the page? Why is navigation bar repeated at the bottom of the page?

EMTEE BIOGRAPHY ARTIST BIOGRAPHY CHANGING LIVES, DEFINING AN ERA

Television Audience 2010 & 2011

What can you tell about these films from this box plot? Could you work out the genre of these films?

Digital Ad. Maximizing TV Stations' Revenues. The Digital Opportunity. A Special Report from Media Group Online, Inc.

Mobile Viewing Trends Emerging Entertainment Technology

Lyrics Take Centre Stage In Streaming Music

We aim to cover the following topics:

WARNING THIS PRESENTATION CONTAINS THE OBVIOUS

WJCT PUBLIC MEDIA TELEVISION RADIO DIGITAL EVENTS WJCT.ORG WJCT APP

QUESTIONNAIRE FACE TO FACE JUNE 2012 FILTERS AND QUOTAS

HOW CONNECTED TV IS CHANGING

ThinkNow Media How Streaming Services & Gaming Are Disrupting Traditional Media Consumption Habits Report

ROY JONES JR. BOXING PROMOTIONS SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE

Exercise 2: D-Type Flip-Flop

WHO WE ARE. Ruriri TV Station, airs live News, Entertainment and Development based events from across Kikuyu speaking areas.

2014 ICMA Digital Use Survey Results. Survey Methodology. Profile of respondents. Smartphones. Job title of respondents. Gender of respondents

Analysis of Cancon Facebook pages and posts

The future of TV: It s blurred

Community Orchestras in Australia July 2012

U-verse. demo practice guide

Partisanship and the Media: Personal Politics Affect Where People Go, What They Trust, and Whether They Pay

GAME ON! THE LIVE SPORTS VIEWING HABITS OF CONNECTED CONSUMERS

Technology. The Not-So-Small Small Screen Peter DaSilva for The New York Times

How FOX Sports Brasil complemented their linear production infrastructure with live content during Summer Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro.

The Power and Relevance of Libraries Takeaways from Pew Internet research

Styleguide All the music from across the BBC in one place. BBC Music Styleguide 2017 Page: 1

L a n t a n a P l a c e

1110 South Avenue Suite 403 Staten Island New York P: F:

HCS TRANSPARENCY. Facebook 12,650 followers Twitter 5,853 followers

TV Group. Portfolio Overview. Jeff Zucker. September 13, 2006

Teaching life skills to teenagers. scrambled egg/wholegrain (wh.)toast instant oatmeal from microwave

The New Standard In Mobile Entertainment

MAIN RESULTS FROM THE ANNUAL STATISTICAL SURVEYS IN THE FIELD OF CULTURE FOR 2010

Overview of Television landscape in New LC1* Markets. *Guj LC1, MP LC1, PHCHP LC1, Raj LC1, UP LC1

HEADLINE SPONSORSHIP

TV RESEARCH, FANSHIP AND VIEWING

bwresearch.com twitter.com/bw_research facebook.com/bwresearch

SYSTIMAX GigaSPEED XL Solution

Mark. My Bible Copy Book. By Sheri Graham

The Council for Research Excellence

BROADCAST. The following concepts help ensure the way we distribute revenue to members is equitable.

Impressions of Canadians on social media platforms and their impact on the news

The Pathway To Ultrabroadband Networks: Lessons From Consumer Behavior

Breaking News English.com Ready-to-Use English Lessons by Sean Banville

The 10 Most Important Insights from Pew Internet s Library Research

Opening Our Eyes. Appendix 3: Detailed survey findings. How film contributes to the culture of the UK

Transcription:

TALKING SOCIAL TV 2: FOLLOW-UP ANALYSIS June 2014 1

TOP TIER REASONS FOR VIEWING ARE SIMILAR FOR YOUNGER AND OLDER VIEWERS REASON FOR WATCHING TOTAL 15-34 35-54 It's a show I watch regularly 58.7% 99 101 It's a show I watch occasionally 22.3% 105 97 The person(s) I'm with wanted to watch the show 13.8% 113 93 I saw a commercial/promo on TV for it 10.5% 98 101 I flipped channels and came across it I was catching up to the current episode/season It just came on the same channel after the last thing I watched 9.5% 7.3% 5.3% Younger viewers above average for social influence on decisions to watch primetime TV. 94 104 111 94 109 95 I saw something about the show on social media 3.1% 136 79 Someone recommended it (face to face or over the phone) 2.9% 128 83 I saw a review or TV program talking about the show I read something about the show in an online article/blog 2.6% 1.5% Though a small factor, digital PR also more likely to drive younger viewers choices. 106 97 123 87 Base: Viewing Instances (Total, n=55,565; Age 15-34, n=24,070; Age 35-54, n=31,495) 2

PROMOS SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT FOR NEW SHOW TUNE-IN AMONG OLDER THAN YOUNGER VIEWERS REASON FOR WATCHING NEW SHOWS TOTAL I saw a commercial/promo on TV for it 39.7% 15-34 35-54 91 105 It's a show I watch regularly 31.9% 110 95 The person(s) I'm with wanted to watch the show It just came on the same channel after the last thing I watched It's a show I watch occasionally I was catching up to the current episode/season 12.1% 10.2% 9.4% 9.4% Peer influence more likely to influence younger viewers decisions to watch new programming. 113 92 99 101 108 95 105 97 I flipped channels and came across it 8.9% 94 103 I saw a review or TV program talking about the show 8.9% 86 108 I saw something about the show on social media 6.8% 110 94 Someone recommended it (face to face or over the phone) 6.1% 112 93 I read something about the show in an online article/blog 4.5% 97 101 Base: Viewing Instances (Total, n=55,565; Age 15-34, n=24,070; Age 35-54, n=31,495) 3

TOP REASONS FOR WATCHING RETURNING SHOWS ARE LARGELY THE SAME ACROSS AGE GROUPS It's a show I watch regularly REASON FOR WATCHING RETURNING SHOWS TOTAL 69.8% 15-34 35-54 98 102 It's a show I watch occasionally 22.0% 105 97 The person(s) I'm with wanted to watch the show 13.8% 108 95 I was catching up to the current episode/season 10.1% 110 93 I saw a commercial/promo on TV for it 8.7% 94 104 I flipped channels and came across it 6.4% 97 102 It just came on the same channel after the last thing I watched 4.2% 117 89 I saw something about the show on social media Someone recommended it (face to face or over the phone) I saw a review or TV program talking about the show 3.3% 2.7% 2.1% SM & WOM more influential in returning show viewing choice among younger viewers. 133 78 122 86 97 102 I read something about the show in an online article/blog 1.0% 110 93 Base: Viewing Instances (Total, n=55,565; Age 15-34, n=24,070; Age 35-54, n=31,495) 4

FOR ALL SHOWS, SUPER CONNECTORS MORE LIKELY THAN AVERAGE TO WATCH BECAUSE OF HABIT REASON FOR WATCHING TOTAL TV SC Sports SC It's a show I watch regularly 58.7% 107 111 It's a show I watch occasionally 22.3% 96 97 The person(s) I'm with wanted to watch the show 13.8% 94 92 I saw a commercial/promo on TV for it 10.5% 101 94 I flipped channels and came across it 9.5% 79 72 I was catching up to the current episode/season 7.3% 102 92 It just came on the same channel after the last thing I watched 5.3% 93 74 I saw something about the show on social media Someone recommended it (face to face or over the phone) I saw a review or TV program talking about the show 3.1% 2.9% 2.6% SM & PR are greater influences on Super Connectors viewing decisions. WOM more likely than average to influence TV SC viewing decisions. 152 148 117 106 122 112 I read something about the show in an online article/blog 1.5% 125 133 Base: Viewing Instances (Total, n=55,565; TV Super Connectors, n=14,599; Sports Super Connectors, n=11,001) 5

SCs CHOICE TO WATCH NEW SHOWS DRIVEN MORE BY SOCIAL EXCHANGES REASON FOR WATCHING NEW SHOWS TOTAL I saw a commercial/promo on TV for it 39.7% TV SC Sports SC 98 101 It's a show I watch regularly 31.9% 118 121 The person(s) I'm with wanted to watch the show 12.1% 122 120 It just came on the same channel after the last thing I watched 10.2% 82 82 It's a show I watch occasionally 9.4% 96 83 I was catching up to the current episode/season 9.4% 84 101 I flipped channels and came across it 8.9% 63 76 I saw a review or TV program talking about the show I saw something about the show on social media Someone recommended it (face to face or over the phone) 8.9% 6.8% 6.1% PR is also more likely to influence new show viewing decisions, especially for Sports SCs. 120 121 144 139 136 112 I read something about the show in an online article/blog 4.5% 116 135 Base: Viewing Instances (Total, n=55,565; TV Super Connectors, n=14,599; Sports Super Connectors, n=11,001) 6

LIKE ALL VIEWERS, SCs DECISION TO WATCH RETURNING SHOWS DRIVEN BY PAST HABIT It's a show I watch regularly REASON FOR WATCHING RETURNING SHOWS TOTAL TV SC Sports SC 69.8% 105 106 It's a show I watch occasionally 22.0% 93 95 The person(s) I'm with wanted to watch the show 13.8% 87 92 I was catching up to the current episode/season 10.1% 101 97 I saw a commercial/promo on TV for it 8.7% 103 93 I flipped channels and came across it 6.4% 90 86 It just came on the same channel after the last thing I watched 4.2% 102 89 I saw something about the show on social media Someone recommended it (face to face or over the phone) I saw a review or TV program talking about the show I read something about the show in an online article/blog 3.3% 2.7% 2.1% 1.0% Communication & PR are bigger influences on TV SCs returning show viewing decisions. 173 157 128 97 131 111 145 126 Sports SCs also more influenced by SM. Base: Viewing Instances (Total, n=55,565; TV Super Connectors, n=14,599; Sports Super Connectors, n=11,001) 7

AVERAGE DAILY TV-RELATED SOCIAL MEDIA REACH WHILE VIEWING IS APPROXIMATELY 1 IN 10 AVERAGE DAILY SM REACH DAILY SM REACH In an average day people who >Interact with TV via SM while viewing, or >Interact with TV via SM while not viewing 19.1% All Social Media 9.3% SM About Show While Watching (Socially Connected Viewing) Base: Average Daily Respondents (n=1,497) An additional 1.1% of people used SM to communicate about another show other than what they are watching. 8

DAILY REACH FOR SHOW-RELATED SOCIAL MEDIA WHILE WATCHING, BY SOCIAL NETWORK DAILY SOCIALLY CONNECTED REACH WHILE VIEWING. Any Social Media 9.3% Facebook 4.8% Twitter 2.0% Video SM 0.6% Photo SM 0.5% Other SM 1.0% Base: Average Daily Respondents (n=1,497) 9

DAILY REACH FOR SHOW-RELATED SM USE WHILE WATCHING HIGHEST FOR SCs, MULTICULTURAL VIEWERS DAILY SOCIALLY CONNECTED REACH WHILE VIEWING Sports Super Connectors TV Super Connectors 18.4% 17.7% 198 190 Hispanic AA Age 35-44 Age 25-34 Age 15-24 Women Total White/Other Men Age 45-54 Asian/Pacific Islander 12.7% 11.5% 10.6% 10.3% 9.9% 9.9% 9.3% 9.2% 8.7% 7.2% 5.4% 136 124 114 110 106 106 100 99 93 77 58 Base: Average Daily Respondents (n=1,497) 10

SHOW-RELATED SM IS HIGHER WHEN CO- VIEWING THAN VIEWING ALONE VIEWING INSTANCES INVOLVING SOCIAL MEDIA NOTE Show-Related SM is related to the specific program people were viewing; TV-Related SM is related to another primetime program. 16.1% 17.8% 14.7% 7.8% Non-TV-Related SM TV-Related SM Show-Related SM 7.8% 1.0% 7.3% 1.1% 8.9% 7.8% 0.9% 5.9% Total Co-Viewing Watching Alone % of SM Experiences Connected to Viewing 45% 50% 40% Base: Viewing Instances (Total, n=55,565; Co-Viewing, n=26,496; Watching Alone, n=29,069) 11

TV PROMOS BY FAR THE BIGGEST FACTOR IN DAILY AD REACH; ONLY A SMALL FRACTION REACHED BY OTHER TYPES OF ADS DAILY AD REACH Any Ad (Net) 24.2% TV Ad 20.5% Any SM Ad (Net) 2.1% Facebook Ad 1.4% Any Other Online Ad (Not on SM) 2.2% Base: Average Daily Respondents (n=1,497) 12