Subject: Florida Statewide Republican Primary Election survey conducted for FloridaPolitics.com

Similar documents
Subject: Florida Statewide Republican Governor Primary Election survey conducted for FloridaPolitics.com

Subject: Florida U.S. Congressional District 13 Primary Election survey

Eisenberger with mayoral lead in Hamilton Largest number undecided

STAYING INFORMED ACROSS THE GARDEN STATE WHERE DO YOU GO AND WHAT DO YOU KNOW?

Penultimate Check-Up on Election 42: LIBERALS OPENING UP DAYLIGHT?

National Survey Results

NATIONAL: BEATLES TOP ALL-TIME ROCK BAND LIST

Views on local news in the federal electoral district of Montmagny-L Islet-Kamouraska-Rivière-du-Loup

Abstract. Keywords Movie theaters, home viewing technology, audiences, uses and gratifications, planned behavior, theatrical distribution

Chapter 21. Margin of Error. Intervals. Asymmetric Boxes Interpretation Examples. Chapter 21. Margin of Error

The Majority of TTC Users Satisfied with the TTC, Overall

The Relationship Between Movie Theatre Attendance and Streaming Behavior. Survey insights. April 24, 2018

The Relationship Between Movie theater Attendance and Streaming Behavior. Survey Findings. December 2018

Marquette Law School Poll, July 15-18, 2013

Impressions of Canadians on social media platforms and their impact on the news

Nielsen Examines TV Viewers to the Political Conventions. September 2008

News-social media poll Stockton Polling Institute Feb , 2017 Weighted frequencies

Quantitative methods

Partisanship and the Media: Personal Politics Affect Where People Go, What They Trust, and Whether They Pay

CONCLUSION The annual increase for optical scanner cost may be due partly to inflation and partly to special demands by the State.

Canadians opinions on our connection to the monarchy

Racial / Ethnic and Gender Diversity in the Orchestra Field

Diversity Report 2017

MATH& 146 Lesson 11. Section 1.6 Categorical Data

A year later, Trudeau remains near post election high on perceptions of having the qualities of a good political leader

Most Canadians think the Prime Minister s trip to India was not a success

Viewers and Voters: Attitudes to television coverage of the 2005 General Election

Signal Survey Summary. submitted by Nanos to Signal Leadership Communication Inc., July 2018 (Submission )

2016 Spring Census Enrollment Report

Trudeau remains strong on preferred PM measure tracked by Nanos

Supplemental content to J Med Libr Assoc. Jul;106(3):dx.doi.org/ /jmla Norton, Tennant, Edwards, Pomputius 2018

Trudeau hits 12 month high, Mulcair 12 month low in wake of Commons incident

Talking Social TV 2. Ed Keller. Beth Rockwood. SVP, Discovery Communications & Chair, CRE Social Media Committee. CEO Keller Fay Group

Northern Dakota County Cable Communications Commission ~

Honeymoon is on - Trudeau up in preferred PM tracking by Nanos

Marquette Law School Poll Toplines March 11-14, 2013

The Fox News Eect:Media Bias and Voting S. DellaVigna and E. Kaplan (2007)

Marquette Law School Poll Toplines March 11-14, 2013

Estimating. Proportions with Confidence. Chapter 10. Copyright 2006 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc.

australian multi-screen report QUARTER 2, 2012 trends in video viewership beyond conventional television sets

National Tracking Poll

STATE JUNIOR TALENT 2014 (Ages 7-12) March 22, 2014 Leesburg, Florida

How Millennials Get News: Inside the Habits of America s First Digital Generation

Unstaged Cancer in the U.S.:

Politics This Week, Obamacare Premiums & Good Girls Revolt

FRENCH FILMS IN FLORIDA

Trudeau top choice as PM, unsure second and at a 12 month high

NANOS. Trudeau sets yet another new high on the preferred PM tracking by Nanos

Almost seven in ten Canadians continue to think Trudeau has the qualities of a good political leader in Nanos tracking

Trudeau scores strongest on having the qualities of a good political leader

B106. OBSOLETE SERVICE OFFERINGS - DATAPHONE DIGITAL SERVICE

Public Opinion Survey, WSPF-TV Page 1-1 N=401 adults in City of St. Petersburg; fielded July 2-13, 2008

NANOS. Trudeau first choice as PM, unsure scores second and at a three year high

Positive trajectory for Trudeau continues hits a twelve month high on preferred PM and qualities of good political leader in Nanos tracking

hc %tar-bhgcr/eagleton-rutgers R11

New York State Board of Elections Voting Machine Replacement Project Task List Revised

PREMIER NEW HIGH-END DEVELOPMENT 30,000+ SF OF RETAIL/RESTAURANT/OFFICE SPACE IN THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS

EXECUTIVE REPORT. All Media Survey 2012 (2)

Black Theatre Live: Evaluation Report: Appendix Two. Macbeth audience survey. Venus Lee, Research Assistant. June 2015

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Module 3: Sample Design and Data Collection Report June 05, 2006

TALKING SOCIAL TV 2 April 10, 2014

ThinkNow Media How Streaming Services & Gaming Are Disrupting Traditional Media Consumption Habits Report

Sundance Institute: Artist Demographics in Submissions & Acceptances. Dr. Stacy L. Smith, Marc Choueiti, Hannah Clark & Dr.

Contents. DVR Penetration Ethnic Penetration...4. DVR v. Non-DVR Time Spent With DVR Time Spent By Demo...9

Local Television Advertising Effectiveness Study. Kathleen Keefe Vice President, Sales March 21, 2008

Supplemental results from a Garden To Café scannable taste test survey for snack fruit administered in classrooms at PSABX on 12/14/2017

U = {p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, y, z} A = {p, r, t, v, z} B = {q, s, u, w, y} C = {p, s, v, y} D = {z} f) g) h) i)

Why visualize data? Advanced GDA and Software: Multivariate approaches, Interactive Graphics, Mondrian, iplots and R. German Bundestagswahl 2005

OUTshine Film Festival s inspire entertain educate LGBTQ+ experience Gloria & Emilio Estefan James Franco The Miami Edition

Benjamin Lieser. Education. University Teaching Experience

The State of Poetry and Poetry Criticism in the UK and Ireland, Jan 2012 Mar 2018

3rd takes a long time/costly difficult to ensure whole population surveyed cannot be used if the measurement process destroys the item

AN EXPERIMENT WITH CATI IN ISRAEL

Margin of Error. p(1 p) n 0.2(0.8) 900. Since about 95% of the data will fall within almost two standard deviations, we will use the formula

Get a Hint! Watch a Video. Save & Exit. The results from a survey of workers in a factory who work overtime on weekends are shown below.

ES&S - EVS Release , Version 4(Revision 1)

Preferred Ottawa Public Library hours of operation GenPop Survey Summary Document 3

Build Your Patron Journey

Asian Journal of Empirical Research

2012 Inspector Survey Analysis Report. November 6, 2012 Presidential General Election

HOSU Licensed Programs Page 1 of 7

Television Audience 2010 & 2011

MARKET PROFILE PROPERTY TYPE:

FORT COLLINS CABLE TELEVISION SERVICES RESIDENTIAL SURVEY MARKED INSTRUMENT (N=701)

STAT 250: Introduction to Biostatistics LAB 6

Purpose Remit Survey Autumn 2016

DV: Liking Cartoon Comedy

OFFICE USE ONLY. BOX 2: Circle the TIME OF DAY you want to audition: BEFORE Noon OR AFTER Noon

GUIDELINES FOR THE UCF 21 TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES. Julia Pet-Edwards Robert L. Armacost. UCF 21-TR September 25, 1997

2007 Summer Census Enrollment Report

The Hymnal Revision Feasibility Study. A Report to the Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music

Overview of Television landscape in New LC1* Markets. *Guj LC1, MP LC1, PHCHP LC1, Raj LC1, UP LC1

DEMOGRAPHICS AND MUSICAL ACTIVITIES

A Majority of Americans Use Apps to Watch Streaming Content on Their Televisions

The National Academy of Christian Acappella Music Artists, Inc.

How Large a Sample? CHAPTER 24. Issues in determining sample size

2004 Campaign News Study in Chicago, Milwaukee and Portland Markets

Undergraduate Enrollment

Illustration 2004 by Betsy Lewin R E P R O D U C I B L E. From the Creators of CLICK, CLACK, MOO: COWS THAT TYPE. and GIGGLE, GIGGLE, QUACK

BBC 6 Music: Service Review

Transcription:

9887 4 th St. N., Suite 200 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone: (727) 245-1962 Fax: (727) 577-7470 Email: info@stpetepolls.org Website: www.stpetepolls.org Matt Florell, President Subject: Florida Statewide Republican Primary Election survey conducted for FloridaPolitics.com Date: July 17, 2018 Executive Summary: This poll of 1,709 likely Florida Republican primary voters was conducted from July 16, 2018 to July 17, 2018. This poll used the registered voter lists supplied by the state of Florida as of May 9, 2018. The sample of voters that were contacted included random samples of registered voters within the boundaries of the state of Florida. The issues surveyed included questions related to Florida's 2018 Republican Primary Election. Methodology: The poll was conducted through an automated phone call polling system. The results were then weighted to account for proportional differences between the respondents' demographics and the demographics of the active Republican primary voter population for the state of Florida. The weighting demographics used were: race, age, gender and media market. The voters polled were chosen at random within the registered Republican voter population within the state of Florida. Voters who said they were not planning to vote were excluded from the results below. The scientific results shown for the questions below have a sample size of 1,709 and a 2.4% Margin of Error at a 95% confidence level.

Respondents' Demographics: Here is a summary of the demographic breakdown of the Registered Republican party voters who responded to this survey: White, Not Hispanic 1518 = 88.8% Black, Not Hispanic 12 = 0.7% Asian or Pacific Islander 15 = 0.9% Hispanic 117 = 6.8% Other or Unknown 47 = 2.8% Male 829 = 48.5% Female 880 = 51.5% 18 to 29 64 = 3.7% 30 to 49 223 = 13.0% 50 to 69 742 = 43.4% 70 and up 680 = 39.8% Pensacola 88 = 5.1% Panama City 45 = 2.6% Tallahassee 42 = 2.5% Jacksonville 208 = 12.2% Gainesville 44 = 2.6% Orlando 386 = 22.6% Tampa 442 = 25.9% West Palm Beach 145 = 8.5% Fort Myers 120 = 7.0% Miami 189 = 11.1%

Summary of Scientific Results: In the Republican primary race for Governor, who would you vote for: Ron DeSantis, Adam Putnam or Bob White? Ron DeSantis: 50.1% Adam Putnam: 29.6% Bob White: 3.5% Undecided: 16.7% Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Ron DeSantis? Favorable: 61.3% Unfavorable: 11.5% Unsure: 27.1% Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Adam Putnam? Favorable: 48.7% Unfavorable: 21.5% Unsure: 29.8% Would you be more likely to support a candidate if they have been endorsed by President Trump? Yes: 65.8% No: 20.5% Unsure: 13.8%

Detailed Results with Demographic Breakdowns for Each Question: In the Republican primary race for Governor, who would you vote for: Ron DeSantis, Adam Putnam or Bob White? Ron DeSantis: 50.1% Adam Putnam: 29.6% Bob White: 3.5% Undecided: 16.7% DeSantis: 50.1% Putnam: 29.7% White: 3.5% Undecided: 16.7% DeSantis: 49.9% Putnam: 30.9% White: 3.6% Undecided: 15.6% DeSantis: 50.0% Putnam: 16.7% White: 16.7% Undecided: 16.7% DeSantis: 66.7% Putnam: 26.7% White: 0% Undecided: 6.7% DeSantis: 48.7% Putnam: 16.2% White: 2.6% Undecided: 32.5% DeSantis: 53.2% Putnam: 29.8% White: 2.1% Undecided: 14.9% DeSantis: 52.4% Putnam: 29.7% White: 3.1% Undecided: 14.8% DeSantis: 48.0% Putnam: 29.8% White: 3.9% Undecided: 18.4% DeSantis: 48.4% Putnam: 34.4% White: 3.1% Undecided: 14.1% DeSantis: 46.6% Putnam: 32.7% White: 5.4% Undecided: 15.2% DeSantis: 49.3% Putnam: 31.3% White: 3.0% Undecided: 16.4% DeSantis: 52.2% Putnam: 26.6% White: 3.5% Undecided: 17.6% DeSantis: 48.9% Putnam: 28.4% White: 5.7% Undecided: 17.0% DeSantis: 48.9% Putnam: 33.3% White: 2.2% Undecided: 15.6% DeSantis: 38.1% Putnam: 47.6% White: 7.1% Undecided: 7.1% DeSantis: 52.4% Putnam: 25.0% White: 3.8% Undecided: 18.8% DeSantis: 50.0% Putnam: 29.5% White: 0% Undecided: 20.5% DeSantis: 52.3% Putnam: 31.6% White: 2.6% Undecided: 13.5% DeSantis: 44.3% Putnam: 37.8% White: 3.4% Undecided: 14.5% DeSantis: 59.3% Putnam: 20.7% White: 3.4% Undecided: 16.6% DeSantis: 52.5% Putnam: 30.0% White: 5.8% Undecided: 11.7% DeSantis: 51.3% Putnam: 14.8% White: 3.2% Undecided: 30.7%

Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Ron DeSantis? Favorable: 61.3% Unfavorable: 11.5% Unsure: 27.1% Favorable: 61.4% Unfavorable: 11.5% Unsure: 27.1% Favorable: 61.8% Unfavorable: 12.3% Unsure: 25.9% Favorable: 58.3% Unfavorable: 8.3% Unsure: 33.3% Favorable: 73.3% Unfavorable: 0% Unsure: 26.7% Favorable: 53.0% Unfavorable: 4.3% Unsure: 42.7% Favorable: 66.0% Unfavorable: 8.5% Unsure: 25.5% Favorable: 62.7% Unfavorable: 12.1% Unsure: 25.2% Favorable: 60.1% Unfavorable: 11.0% Unsure: 28.9% Favorable: 73.4% Unfavorable: 10.9% Unsure: 15.6% Favorable: 59.2% Unfavorable: 14.3% Unsure: 26.5% Favorable: 60.1% Unfavorable: 12.1% Unsure: 27.8% Favorable: 62.4% Unfavorable: 10.0% Unsure: 27.6% Favorable: 60.2% Unfavorable: 12.5% Unsure: 27.3% Favorable: 62.2% Unfavorable: 6.7% Unsure: 31.1% Favorable: 47.6% Unfavorable: 19.0% Unsure: 33.3% Favorable: 62.0% Unfavorable: 14.4% Unsure: 23.6% Favorable: 54.5% Unfavorable: 6.8% Unsure: 38.6% Favorable: 65.0% Unfavorable: 11.1% Unsure: 23.8% Favorable: 61.5% Unfavorable: 12.7% Unsure: 25.8% Favorable: 68.3% Unfavorable: 9.0% Unsure: 22.8% Favorable: 60.0% Unfavorable: 12.5% Unsure: 27.5% Favorable: 53.4% Unfavorable: 7.9% Unsure: 38.6%

Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Adam Putnam? Favorable: 48.7% Unfavorable: 21.5% Unsure: 29.8% Favorable: 48.9% Unfavorable: 21.4% Unsure: 29.7% Favorable: 50.4% Unfavorable: 22.1% Unsure: 27.5% Favorable: 25.0% Unfavorable: 25.0% Unsure: 50.0% Favorable: 40.0% Unfavorable: 13.3% Unsure: 46.7% Favorable: 31.6% Unfavorable: 16.2% Unsure: 52.1% Favorable: 53.2% Unfavorable: 14.9% Unsure: 31.9% Favorable: 52.4% Unfavorable: 20.7% Unsure: 26.9% Favorable: 45.7% Unfavorable: 22.0% Unsure: 32.3% Favorable: 60.9% Unfavorable: 17.2% Unsure: 21.9% Favorable: 52.5% Unfavorable: 17.5% Unsure: 30.0% Favorable: 52.7% Unfavorable: 22.4% Unsure: 24.9% Favorable: 42.5% Unfavorable: 22.1% Unsure: 35.4% Favorable: 37.5% Unfavorable: 21.6% Unsure: 40.9% Favorable: 53.3% Unfavorable: 26.7% Unsure: 20.0% Favorable: 69.0% Unfavorable: 16.7% Unsure: 14.3% Favorable: 45.7% Unfavorable: 20.2% Unsure: 34.1% Favorable: 47.7% Unfavorable: 13.6% Unsure: 38.6% Favorable: 50.8% Unfavorable: 19.2% Unsure: 30.1% Favorable: 61.1% Unfavorable: 21.0% Unsure: 17.9% Favorable: 41.4% Unfavorable: 26.2% Unsure: 32.4% Favorable: 45.8% Unfavorable: 25.8% Unsure: 28.3% Favorable: 28.0% Unfavorable: 23.3% Unsure: 48.7%

Would you be more likely to support a candidate if they have been endorsed by President Trump? Yes: 65.8% No: 20.5% Unsure: 13.8% Yes: 65.8% No: 20.5% Unsure: 13.8% Yes: 64.8% No: 21.0% Unsure: 14.2% Yes: 50.0% No: 41.7% Unsure: 8.3% Yes: 80.0% No: 13.3% Unsure: 6.7% Yes: 76.9% No: 12.8% Unsure: 10.3% Yes: 70.2% No: 19.1% Unsure: 10.6% Yes: 66.7% No: 19.7% Unsure: 13.6% Yes: 64.9% No: 21.2% Unsure: 13.9% Yes: 62.5% No: 28.1% Unsure: 9.4% Yes: 65.5% No: 18.4% Unsure: 16.1% Yes: 63.9% No: 22.9% Unsure: 13.2% Yes: 68.2% No: 17.8% Unsure: 14.0% Yes: 63.6% No: 21.6% Unsure: 14.8% Yes: 60.0% No: 15.6% Unsure: 24.4% Yes: 73.8% No: 14.3% Unsure: 11.9% Yes: 68.8% No: 19.2% Unsure: 12.0% Yes: 72.7% No: 18.2% Unsure: 9.1% Yes: 61.9% No: 22.3% Unsure: 15.8% Yes: 64.0% No: 21.5% Unsure: 14.5% Yes: 64.1% No: 24.1% Unsure: 11.7% Yes: 64.2% No: 23.3% Unsure: 12.5% Yes: 75.7% No: 13.8% Unsure: 10.6%