RF Power Klystrons & 20 Year Look. R. Nelson 7/15/15

Similar documents
Operating Experience and Reliability Improvements on the 5 kw CW Klystron at Jefferson Lab

RF Upgrades & Experience At JLab. Rick Nelson

RF Power Upgrade at Jefferson Lab

High Brightness Injector Development and ERL Planning at Cornell. Charlie Sinclair Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics

Introduction: CW SRF linac types, requirements and challenges High power RF system architecture

Pulsed Klystrons for Next Generation Neutron Sources Edward L. Eisen - CPI, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA

RF Power Generation II

IOT OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE ON ALICE AND EMMA AT DARESBURY LABORATORY

RF plans for ESS. Morten Jensen. ESLS-RF 2013 Berlin

SRS and ERLP developments. Andrew moss

News from HZB / BESSY Wolfgang Anders at ESLS-RF Meeting September 2010 Trieste

The Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation

IOT RF Power Sources for Pulsed and CW Linacs

Evaluation of Performance, Reliability, and Risk for High Peak Power RF Sources from S-band through X-band for Advanced Accelerator Applications

Solid State Modulators for X-Band Accelerators

3 cerl. 3-1 cerl Overview. 3-2 High-brightness DC Photocathode Gun and Gun Test Beamline

NSLS-II RF Systems James Rose, Radio Frequency Group Leader PAC 2011

2 Work Package and Work Unit descriptions. 2.8 WP8: RF Systems (R. Ruber, Uppsala)

ESS Linac WP8 Radio Frequency Systems and Test Facilities

Spear3 RF System Sam Park 11/06/2003. Spear3 RF System. High Power Components Operation and Control. RF Requirement.

RF Solutions for Science.

Status of BESSY II and berlinpro. Wolfgang Anders. Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin for Materials and Energy (HZB) 20th ESLS-RF Meeting

18 GHz, 2.2 kw KLYSTRON GENERATOR GKP 24KP 18GHz WR62 3x400V

Oak Ridge Spallation Neutron Source Proton Power Upgrade Project and Second Target Station Project

INFN School on Electron Accelerators. RF Power Sources and Distribution

14 GHz, 2.2 kw KLYSTRON GENERATOR GKP 22KP 14GHz WR62 3x400V

Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation

IOT Charakterization at BESSY ( HZB)

K800 RF AMPLIFIER TUBE UPGRADE

Status of SOLARIS. Paweł Borowiec On behalf of Solaris Team

Current status of XFEL/SPring-8 project and SCSS test accelerator

Empirical Model For ESS Klystron Cathode Voltage

Diamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes

The ALS RF systems, upgrades and ALS-U plans

CEBAF 8 kw CW KLYSTRON SPECIFICATION EE0043, Rev. H January 15, 1998

TOSHIBA Industrial Magnetron E3328

CHAPTER 4: HIGH ENERGY X-RAY GENERATORS: LINEAR ACCELERATORS. Jason Matney, MS, PhD

Development of High Power Vacuum Tubes for Accelerators and Plasma Heating

RF considerations for SwissFEL

Next Linear Collider. The 8-Pack Project. 8-Pack Project. Four 50 MW XL4 X-band klystrons installed on the 8-Pack

Upgrade of CEBAF to 12 GeV

Development of Multiple Beam Guns for High Power RF Sources for Accelerators and Colliders

Status of RF Power and Acceleration of the MAX IV - LINAC

CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3

DELIVERY RECORD. Location: Ibaraki, Japan

TITLE PAGE. Title of paper: PUSH-PULL FEL, A NEW ERL CONCEPT Author: Andrew Hutton. Author Affiliation: Jefferson Lab. Requested Proceedings:

LLRF at SSRF. Yubin Zhao

Present Status and Future Upgrade of KEKB Injector Linac

ANKA RF System - Upgrade Strategies

BBU threshold current study for 6 GeV beam in 12 GeV beamline setup

4.4 Injector Linear Accelerator

Upgrading LHC Luminosity

DEVELOPMENT OF A 10 MW SHEET BEAM KLYSTRON FOR THE ILC*

XFEL High Power RF System Recent Developments

Linac3 experience for LHC ion runs

The PEFP 20-MeV Proton Linear Accelerator

CEBAF Accelerator Update. Michael Tiefenback CASA Accelerator Physics Experimental Liaison June 14, 2017

LCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems

Towards an X-Band Power Source at CERN and a European Structure Test Facility

North Damping Ring RF

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF L-BAND AND S-BAND MULTI BEAM KLYSTRONS

9th ESLS RF Meeting September ALBA RF System. F. Perez. RF System 1/20

Availability and Reliability Issues for the ILC

Jefferson Lab Experience with Beam Halo, Beam Loss, etc.

Detailed Design Report

Low Level RF for PIP-II. Jonathan Edelen LLRF 2017 Workshop (Barcelona) 16 Oct 2017

PEP-I1 RF Feedback System Simulation

ADVANCED HIGH-POWER MICROWAVE VACUUM ELECTRON DEVICE DEVELOPMENT

LCLS Injector Technical Review

The ESS Accelerator. For Norwegian Industry and Research. Oslo, 24 Sept Håkan Danared Deputy Head Accelerator Division Group Leader Beam Physics

Examples of Successful Collaboration Between CPI and DOE Labs. Todd Treado CPI December 2013

ILC-LNF TECHNICAL NOTE

Klystron Tubes. Two forms of such a device, also called linear beam klystron, are given in the following figure.

Low-Energy Electron Linacs and Their Applications in Cargo Inspection

High-power klystrons. The benchmark in scientific research. State-of-the-art RF sources for your accelerator

About vacuum power tubes.

III. Proton-therapytherapy. Rome SB - 3/5 1

ESS Linac WP8 Radio Frequency Systems and Test Facilities

Status of CTF3. G.Geschonke CERN, AB

650MHz/800kW Klystron Development at IHEP

Pulses inside the pulse mode of operation at RF Gun

Proton Engineering Frontier Project

Program Risks Risk Analysis Fallback Plans for the. John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006

What can be learned from HERA Experience for ILC Availability

Suggested ILC Beam Parameter Range Rev. 2/28/05 Tor Raubenheimer

Performance of a DC GaAs photocathode gun for the Jefferson lab FEL

Activities on FEL Development and Application at Kyoto University

A New 4MW LHCD System for EAST

PEP-II Overview & Ramp Down Plan. J. Seeman DOE PEP-II Ramp Down-D&D Review August 6-7, 2007

Improvements to the APS LINAC and SR/Booster klystron HVPS, and Accomplishments of the 352MHz RFTS

The European Spallation Source

L-Band RF R&D. SLAC DOE Review June 15 th, Chris Adolphsen SLAC

The. Radio History. How and Why Quincy, IL Became the Digital Capitol of the World. By Tom Yingst

DESIGN OF 250-MW CW RF SYSTEM FOR APT. Daniel E. Rees. PAC '97 Conference. Vancouver, Canada. May 12-16, 1997 DISCLAIMER

UNIT-3 Part A. 2. What is radio sonde? [ N/D-16]

KEKB INJECTOR LINAC AND UPGRADE FOR SUPERKEKB

Electron linac photo-fission driver for rare isotope program at TRIUMF

The LEP Superconducting RF System

LENS Operating Experience

Status and Plans for PEP-II

Transcription:

RF Power Klystrons & 20 Year Look R. Nelson 7/15/15

RF Power klystrons 8 x 13 kw klystrons Page 2

Why A klystron? Best (only) choice at the time - 1988 Easy to use: Input (drive), output (to CM), power source (CPS) High gain Moderate efficiency, when operating saturated We don t run there Existing design tweaked for frequency and power 2kW became 5kW (later 8), 1.3 GHz to 1.497 GHz Water-cooled (most heat dumped into water) 33% efficient (rated power) A custom solution for our requirements Page 3

RF Power Only klystrons were considered 5kW saturated power using klystrons Up to 8 kw (FEL & 0L04) 42¼ cryomodules + capture = 340 klystrons Initial purchase: 350 24 in FEL zones, 4 for cavity testing 1 prototype in FEL buncher Supplemental purchases: 120 for spares, FEL, 10 for 0L02 R100 upgrade Rebuilds along the way 4 x 1 kw SSAs for separation IOTs: 4 for separation (499 & 748.5 MHz) Page 4

12 GeV Upgrade 80 cavities = 80 klystrons Higher efficiency, higher power Purchase: 84 including first article Also considered IOT & SSA IOT concerns» None built for 1.497 GHz» Some in service at 1.3 GHz» Higher cost, lower gain (high drive required - 100W preamp vs 0.1 2 W IOT advantages: efficiency SSA: Advancing, but not there yet (cost, size, capabilities) Page 5

How We ve Fared Original spec asked for minimum 20k hour life Anticipated failures: 100 failures/yr. Didn t happen Repair contracts (3) Rebuild up to 3 times Early fails: catastrophic not cathode depletion Internal leakage on ceramic Thermal runaway (mod anode effects) Leakage still most common fail Imposes limits on tube Page 6

Klystron Failures: Part 1 Year Klystron Cum Klystron Klystron Cum Klystron Avg Klystron Cum Avg Klystron Filament Hrs Filament Hrs Failures Failures Fil. Hrs / Failure Fil. Hrs / Failure 1990 40,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 1991 150,000 190,000 11 11 13,636 17,273 1992 365,000 555,000 19 30 19,211 18,500 1993 390,000 945,000 12 42 32,500 22,500 1994 700,000 1,645,000 9 51 77,778 32,255 1995 2,268,000 3,913,000 34 85 66,706 46,035 1996 2,187,000 6,100,000 14 99 156,214 61,616 1997 2,546,000 8,646,000 12 111 212,167 77,892 1998 2,626,000 11,272,000 3 114 875,333 98,877 1999 2,277,000 13,549,000 12 126 189,750 107,532 2000 2,424,000 15,973,000 16 142 151,500 112,486 2001 2,538,000 18,511,000 5 147 507,600 125,925 2002 2,032,000 20,543,000 1 148 2,032,000 138,804 2003 2,309,600 22,852,600 12 160 192,467 142,829 2004 2,715,456 25,568,056 13 173 208,881 147,792 2005 2,657,232 28,225,288 3 176 885,744 160,371 2006 2,343,600 30,568,888 7 183 334,800 167,043 2007 2,077,440 32,646,328 14 197 148,389 165,717 Page 7

Klystron Failures: Part 2 Year Failed Weeks Running FY2008 9 (11?) FY2009 11 FY2010 7 FY2011 4 FY2012 5 FY2015 5 18 240 Page 8

Klystron Procurement Times Recent: R100 upgrade klystron buy (10 pcs) Req entered: 10/1/12 Signed/Bid: 10/3/12-12/20/12 Placed: 12/21/12 1 st received: 5/30/14 Last received: 8/26/14 5.4 months ARO for 1 st (8 mo from start) Time to 10 th unit: 8.3 mo ARO (11 mo from start) Maximum delivery rate? Page 9

Klystron Pros & Cons Pros Proven solution Long life Fits our sockets Easy replacement High gain High output power Cons Moderate / variable efficiency Input power remains constant Rising replacement cost (like most things) Dangerous high voltage ( always touted by SSA proponents)

SSA (Solid State Amplifiers) Evolving, prices dropping, power per device up though 1.497 GHz not a mainstream frequency Transistors developed for large markets we re a small user Generally higher efficiency (more constant) Complex designs (multiple stages, splitters, combiners, etc.) Soft failure modes (gradual power loss) Safe low voltage operation (50V/400A) Major hardware changes to drop in At $11/w, 88k$ per device X340 units = 30M$ Page 11

SSA SBIR Efforts Several attempts over 10+ years Nothing usable yet Price, unknown SBIR companies typically not production capable, nor are developing an Innovative design

SBIR: Design to Fit Our Space Multi-module amplifier could be installed in our HPA Page 13

SBIR SSA Page 14

Magnetrons Research being done here at JLab and looking with multiple approaches It s an oscillator - industrial cookers, radar Cost-effective power with high efficiency As an amplifier, more complex system (multiple magnetrons, waveguide components, etc.) Injection locking for frequency control, hybrid combining to adjust power? Modulated HV and magnetic? Not a drop-in replacement for our klystrons Significant changes a new system (as with SSA) Page 15

Other Magnetron Comments Shorter life (than klystrons or SSA) Applicability based on requirements Individual devices may cost less per watt, but additional hardware adds significant expense Page 16

MEIC RF Power (H. Wang) Frequency (MHz) CEBA F 12GeV E- Ring PEP-II 10GeV Ion-linac Pb 60MeV/u 1497 476.3 162.5 /325 Booster Ion-Ring Pb 40GeV/u CC- ERL Cooler 55MeV 0.6-1.3 1.2-1.3 952.6 476.3 /952.6 Crab (16+6)X 2MV Duty Cycle (%) cw cw 0.5 ramp ramp cw cw Cw Cavity sc 2K nc nc nc nc sc 2K nc/sc 2K sc 2K 952.6 Max Peak Power(MW) Average Power (MW) Klystron DC-RF Efficiency (%) Magnetron DC- RF Efficiency (%) DC Power Save (MW) 2.76 12.79 42 0.36 0.73 0.12 0.0023 2.76 12.79 0.46 0.084 0.36 0.73 0.12 0.0023 35-51 67 50-60 na na 50-60 50-60 50-60 80-90 80-90 80-90 na na 80-90 80-90 80-90 3.4-3.8 3.1-4.9 0.26-0.35 na na 0.41-0.55 0.07-0.09 0.0013-0.0017 Page 17

Future Continue to Supply RF k$ Continue buying present klystrons unless requirements change 2 vendors (one hasn t built it since our original buy) Prices on the rise 1990 $9k (Varian) 1990 $9k Varian 2000 $13k (Litton) 2000 $13k L-3 2012 $32k (L-3) 2012 $32k L-3 2014 $43k L-3 2014 $43k (budgetary) $60k 10 5 2016-35 TBD?? 0 2016-2035?? Monitor options for alternate tech with major system changes Monitor integrity of other components 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Page 18

Klystron Health 2009 snapshot: 0.63/week of operation (.28 later) How many weeks, how many failures? Expect rate to increase as EOL approaches When? Metrics not available to predict Spares: 12 on hand Installed: 16 poor (limited) tubes Cost: increasing 20 per year proposal wasn t funded Arne suggests 500k$/year (~10 units per year) A good start but start soon Page 19

Thank You OK, we haven t run out yet, but we really should buy klystrons crying wolf? Page 20