The speed of life. How consumers are changing the way they watch, rent, and buy movies. Consumer intelligence series.

Similar documents
Online community dialogue conducted in March Summary: evolving TV distribution models

2016 Cord Cutter & Cord Never Study

Digital Democracy Survey A multi-generational view of consumer technology, media and telecom trends

Why split up Netflix?

ThinkNow Media How Streaming Services & Gaming Are Disrupting Traditional Media Consumption Habits Report

FILM, TV & GAMES CONFERENCE 2015

Overview: 400% growth in 20 months

Pulling the plug: Three-in-ten Canadians are forgoing home TV service in favour of online streaming

Coinstar, Inc. Analyst Day May 16, 2012

Mobile Viewing Trends Emerging Entertainment Technology

CONQUERING CONTENT EXCERPT OF FINDINGS

5INSIGHTS TO KNOW CONTENT MATTERS IDEAS IMPACTING THE CONTENT COMMUNITY 2016 Q3 ISSUE #1

Blockbuster Advertising Campaign By Cara Smith, Chi Kalu, Bill Citro, Tomoka Aono

May 29, 2012 LONG: Coinstar (CSTR) Price; $60 Market Cap: $1.9 bil Enterprise Value $1.9 bil Average Daily Volume: 1.2 mm shares

TV Subscriptions and Licence Fees

Digital Day 2016 Overview of findings

ONLINE VIDEO. Market situation

Future of TV. Features and Benefits

Discussion Materials December 10, 2012

REACHING THE UN-REACHABLE

NETFLIX: THE FUTURE OF ENTERTAINMENT OR HOUSE OF CARDS? Aswath Damodaran

Seen on Screens: Viewing Canadian Feature Films on Multiple Platforms 2007 to April 2015

Television, Internet and Mobile Usage in the U.S. A2/M2 Three Screen Report

1. Introduction. 2. Part A: Executive Summary

From Screening to Streaming: Film Industry in Transition

Study on the audiovisual content viewing habits of Canadians in June 2014

The market environment is getting even more competitive; there will be not only winners

BSAC Business Briefing. TV Consumption Trends in the Multi-Screen Era. October 2012

Smart DVR, Brilliant TV.

ENERGY STAR Partner Meeting

Business Case for CloudTV

MGMT 180: Film & Television Marketing and Management. Course Syllabus. June 26 August 4, 2017 Room D313, UCLA Anderson

Connected Life Market Watch:

The ins and outs of online video

CANADIAN AUDIENCE REPORT. Full report

BEFORE THE HOUSE ENERGY AND COMMERCE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY THE FUTURE OF VIDEO

Media and Entertainment: The Fight for Consumers Time and Money

THE CROSSPLATFORM REPORT

TV RESEARCH, FANSHIP AND VIEWING

PT M Cash IPO Profile

TV Subscriptions and Licence Fees

Sonic's Third Quarter Results Reflect Current Challenges

Branson Gospel Sunday. How To Access Branson Gospel Sunday programming and the vast programming. available on FARM AND RANCH TV

This is a licensed product of AM Mindpower Solutions and should not be copied

Residuals Informational Meeting. Los Angeles March 24, 2016

BFI RESEARCH AND STATISTICS PUBLISHED AUGUST 2016 THE UK FILM MARKET AS A WHOLE. Image: Mr Holmes courtesy of eone Films

etflix Reducing Our Rating from BUY to HOLD

THE ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS

French Canada s Media Landscape Prepared For IAB. French Canada Executive Summary Prepared by PHD Canada, Rob Young January

Canada s Media Landscape Prepared For IAB. Total Canada Executive Summary Prepared by PHD Canada, Rob Young December

INVESTING for GROWTH. The Marcus Corporation. Gabelli & Company Inaugural Movie Conference March 12, 2009

The Pathway To Ultrabroadband Networks: Lessons From Consumer Behavior

Additional media information United States & United Kingdom

An Economic Overview, Stocks vs. Bonds, and An Update on Three Stocks

AUSTRALIAN SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION AND RADIO ASSOCIATION

The Relationship Between Movie Theatre Attendance and Streaming Behavior. Survey insights. April 24, 2018

Netflix: Amazing Growth But At A High Price

The Communications Market: Digital Progress Report

Credit Suisse Global Media and Communications Convergence Conference March 8, 2011

NIELSEN MUSIC U.S. MUSIC REPORT HIGHLIGHTS

Why TV in 2018? WHY KOB ADVERTISING

Cool Off With Premium Video Content: How Viewers are Beating The Heat During Summer Months

Gabelli & Co Exhibitor Media Conference March 17, 2011

TV EVERYWHERE /OTT CTVE

If you really want the widest possible audience,

Consumers Continue to Carve Out More Time for Media

The Relationship Between Movie theater Attendance and Streaming Behavior. Survey Findings. December 2018

Looking Ahead: Viewing Canadian Feature Films on Multiple Platforms. July 2013

The ABC and the changing media landscape

LEARNING FROM DOCUMENTARY AUDIENCES: A Market Research Study

LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS: Maintaining an Important Presence in 2016 & Beyond. August Copyright All Rights Reserved.


Domestic Box Office Admissions per Capita ( ) Admissions per cap Home entertainment advancements Cinematic experience advancements

Case 2:17-cv DDP-AGR Document 82 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1742

An informational presentation about cutting the ties from traditional cable television.

QuickPlay Media US Mobile TV and Video Survey 2011 Summary

GfK Briefing to BASE SVOD Content Consumption Tracking

CMU:DIY. CMUdiy.com/streamingbusiness

Town Hall Meeting Fiber to Home Q&A January 28, 2016

THE SVOD REPORT: CHARTING THE GROWTH IN SVOD SERVICES ACROSS THE UK 1 DAILY CONSOLIDATED TV VIEWING 2 UNMATCHED VIEWING

Wherever a trailer is shared, the point of sale is shared

WELLS BRANCH COMMUNITY LIBRARY COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT PLAN JANUARY DECEMBER 2020

NIELSEN MUSIC HIGHLIGHTS 1 NIELSEN MUSIC HIGHLIGHTS REPORT

The Impact of Media Censorship: Evidence from a Field Experiment in China

Film consumers in Canada; three-year trends and focus group findings DOCUMENT CONFIDENTIEL

Polaris Nordic Digital Music in the Nordics. By: Simon Bugge Jensen & Marie Christiansen Krøyer

Amazon takes on Netflix with on- line video streaming

Contemporary Chamber Ensemble

Cutting the Cord. Presenter. Watch Video Programs on Your Terms

1-Year Chart: 5-Year Chart:

Cutting the Cord. Presenter. Watch Video Programs on Your Terms

Media Comparisons 2012 Persons

OVERVIEW OF THE MOVIE BUSINESS

DISCOVER NOW MISSED A SHOW? VIDEO IS KING VIDEOS TO GO ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF TV SUBSCRIPTION- BASED ONLY NOT JUST FOR TECHNOLOGY NERDS

Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band. Notice No. SLPB Published in the Canada Gazette, Part 1 Dated January 3, 2015

2018 MEDIA KIT ASSETS

THE EVOLUTION OF TV. 7 dynamics transforming TV

P1: OTA/XYZ P2: ABC c01 JWBK457-Richardson March 22, :45 Printer Name: Yet to Come

FILM ON DIGITAL VIDEO

Extraordinary Together. Zee Entertainment Entertainment Content Company

Transcription:

The speed of life Consumer intelligence series How consumers are changing the way they watch, rent, and buy movies Online and consumer discovery sessions held between July and October 2010 Series overview Through PwC s ongoing consumer research program, we gain directional insights on consumer attitudes and behaviors in the rapidly changing media landscape. This paper summarizes key findings from a survey about movie content and digital media consumption. It addresses consumer preferences related to renting and purchasing behavior, the appeal of timeliness in movie consumption, interest in special features and their impact on motivating consumers to purchase rather than rent. To explore this topic, we conducted a twophased program. In Phase 1 we explored the broad issues of movie consumption by surveying more than 360 people between the ages of 18 and 59 in July 2010, then held three live focus group sessions to probe underlying motivators for the data collected. In Phase 2 of the research, we surveyed 200 participants to more deeply explore trends revealed in the initial survey. Key findings in the Phase 2 survey confirm key Phase 1 findings, including those related to online preferences, reasons for purchasing discs, and interest in paying a premium to view movies sooner. Combined, these two pieces of research represent a sample of 560 people at the 9 9 degree of confidence. Executive summary Smartphones. ipads. Netflix. Redbox. On Demand. When it comes to viewing movie content, today s digitally connected environment is driving profound changes in the way consumers rent, purchase, and watch films. While renting continues to be the primary method of obtaining movie content, more consumers are opting to rent movies through low-cost mail subscription services or digitally stream movies to their television, computer, or mobile device. Owning a physical copy still has some appeal, especially for consumers who want to build their film library, acquire movies with unique content, or watch a particular movie time and again. Content quality that enhances the viewing experience, such as Blu-ray, may also motivate consumers to purchase a disc. But many consumers are not motivated to buy based on incentives such as embedded digital codes. This is likely due to lack of awareness and understanding about digital alternatives and is an opportunity for content producers to educate consumers. As film companies consider new ways to reach consumers in the digital age, the widespread appeal of renting a physical or digital copy demonstrates that models based on price and convenience may be the most attractive to consumers. Meanwhile, while the majority of consumers say the ability to obtain content sooner is not appealing enough to warrant incremental costs, either as purchases or rentals, about one-third of consumers say they would be interested in paying more to access content earlier, such as by paying a premium at the theater to receive a copy of the disc.

Key findings 1. The Phase 1 research showed that consumers across age groups spend just under 20 hours per week viewing digital content on their cell phone, computer, or mobile device. See Table 1. Across digital media types surveyed, the most time is spent digitally viewing TV shows/videos. The least amount of time is spent viewing video on mobile devices across all age groups. This finding is consistent with our Global Entertainment and Media Outlook that forecasts viewing mobile TV video is expected to grow at a 17% CAGR through 2014, but mobile TV is still a very small percentage (1%) of the entire TV subscription market. The 18-34 and 35-44 age groups are the most digitally active overall, spending on average nearly 6 more time engaged with visual digital content than the 45 59 age group. Both the 18-34 and 35-44 age groups spend more time watching television shows and video that has been downloaded or streamed as well as digitally recorded than any other digital or non-digital activity. The 18-34 age group spends more time playing video games (online and offline) than any other age group. With the exception of the 45-59 age group, more time is spent consuming digital content than consuming non-digital content (offline). The 45-59 age group spends the most time watching television/video on network TV or basic cable channels. See Table 2. Table 1 Online/mobile hours per week spent viewing content Age group Watching TV shows/videos (downloaded; streamed; digitally recorded; online) Watching movies downloaded or streamed; on-demand (pay & free); digitally recorded Reading newspaper books, magazines (online, mobile, or on e-reader) Watching video on mobile device Playing video games online wireless or on mobile device Total hours per week watching online/mobile content Total 7.3 5.1 4.4 0.3 2.2 19.3 18 34 8.0 5.3 4.8 0.3 3.0 21.4 35 44 8.6 6.8 4.4 0.5 2.3 22.6 45 59 5.1 3.2 4.0 0.1 1.4 13.8 Table 2 Hours per week spent viewing non-online/non-mobile content Age group Watching TV shows/movies on network TV/basic cable Watching TV shows/movies on pay cable channels Watching movies at the theater (includes 3D) Watching movies rented from RedBox, Blockbuster, Netflix Playing video games on home console (owned & rented) Reading paper newspapers, books & magazines Total 6.1 2.8 1.5 1.1 2.4 1.9 15.8 18 34 5.6 2.8 1.9 1.4 4.2 1.9 17.8 35 44 6.3 3.2 1.5 1.2 1.8 1.8 15.8 45 59 6.5 2.5 1.1 0.7 1.1 2.0 13.9 Total hours per week watching non-online/ non-mobile content PwC 2

2. Phase 2 of the research confirmed that renting is the primary method of viewing video/movie content, primarily because consumers see it as a better value. Whether it s online, via mail subscription (such as Netflix), or at a physical site (such as Blockbuster or a RedBox physical rental), more people are likely to rent their movies than purchase a copy or download a permanent copy from a website. See Chart 2. Consumers feel they are getting a better price or saving money by not buying. See Chart 1. Of all available methods, more consumers (43%) are more likely to rent a physical copy via mail subscription service once per month or more. 32% rent via online subscription services once per month or more. 31% obtain video/movie content by streaming (free) once per month or more, from a nonsubscription-based Internet website, legally and/or illegally. Purchase/fee-based options fell into the bottom relative to behavior and frequency. Chart 2 Ways of obtaining movie content The times have changed. Having a physical copy of something, that s almost gone. People are downloading and you have your file on your computer. Respondent, age 35 44 Chart 1 Reason for renting 6 5 4 3 1 49.7% Better price/ save money 26.3% Convenience 4.8% 0.6% Obtaining it Quality sooner than of viewing when it s experience available via other venues (such as rental or ad-supported streaming) 16.6% Other Rent a physical copy (like a DVD) by mail, via a subscription service, like Netflix Rent on-line via a subscription service, like Netflix streaming service Streamed from a non-subscription-based Internet website (e.g., Hulu: abc.com) for free Rent a physical copy (like a DVD) from a kiosk (like Redbox) Rent a physical copy (like a DVD) from a store (like Blockbuster) Borrow a physical copy (like a DVD) from a friend or relative Purchase a physical copy, like a DVD Via free download from an Internet site 42.6% 31.7% 30.7% 29.2% 23.3% 19.3% Purchase via video on demand from your TV provider (e.g., your cable company) 12.9% Paid a fee to stream from an Internet website Purchase via download from an Internet website Purchase a physical copy (DVD) that comes with a digital code to download into your digital library 5.4% 6.9% 9.4% Note: Purchase options at bottom of behavior/frequency 1 3 4 5 % sample size PwC 3

3. Digital has become the preferred way to view movie content, as evidenced by the decline in disc purchases/ rentals as well as the number of hours spent viewing digital content (Phase 1 research). See Table 1. Confirmed in Phase 2 of the research, consumers spend about half as much time (almost three hours per week) watching movies rented from traditional brick and mortar sites, as digitally rented movies. 4. Disc purchases are highly discretionary, and are primarily purchased as gifts or to obtain content that is personally meaningful to the consumer For instance, a film that contains unique content (such as Titanic), enhances the viewing experience, or is something the consumer wants to watch more than once (such as a classic or to build a viewing library). See Chart 3. The single-highest driver to purchase (rather than rent) video content (66%) is if it s something I want to watch more than once such as a classic. Gifts account for the second-highest driver to purchase discs (almost 5). The promise of a high-quality viewing experience was also a factor to buy rather than rent, boding well for Blu-ray purchases. 5. Digital upgrade options available with disc purchases aren t resonating. There is low awareness and potential confusion for this feature. Only 6% of respondents said they acquire movie/video content (once per month or more) via a digital code that comes with the physical disc. See Chart 4. Chart 4 Frequency of accessing digital code 7 6 5 4 3 1 59.4% Never 14.9% Less than once per year 12.9% 1 2 times per year 7.4% once every 3 months 4. once per month 1. once per week 0. More than once per week Chart 3 Reasons for purchasing video/movie content The movie/content is something you ll want to watch more than once 65.8% Giving as a gift 49. For higher fidelity, for a higher quality viewing experience 40.6% The movie/video is unique, one-of-a-kind 38.6% Have access to movie/video content faster than waiting for online, mail or store rental availability 36.1% Ability to view when traveling (e.g., on laptop or other mobile device) 35.6% It is my first time viewing the content (e.g., a movie I have not seen before) Getting extra content (e.g., outtakes, interviews with actors, directors, extra scenes/alternate endings) Ability to share the content digitally with others 17.8% 26.2% 24.8% Note: Extra content, interviews, scences fall to the bottom relative to ability to influence content purchase. Comes with a digital code to download into your digital library 15.8% Other 5. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 % sample size PwC 4

6. Digital streaming is highly appealing because of its flexibility. Consumers also found the ability to download to their computer screen or connect through their game player highly appealing (Phase 1 research). See Chart 5. Chart 5 Preferred method to rent a movie/video 3 3 1 32.3% Using an online subscriptionbased streaming service (like Netflix or itunes) 24.6% Going to a video rental kiosk outside the grocery, drug store, etc. (e.g., RedBox) 16.8% Using a mail subscription (also like Netflix or Blockbuster by mail) 15.6% Going to a video rental store (e.g., Blockbuster or local video store) 8.4% Using video on demand (e.g., from your cable provider) 7. Both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the research found that streaming video content is perceived to be more convenient because consumers do not have to go out to buy or rent a movie, and because it gives them more options they can view what they want, where they want, whenever they want. See Table 3. Table 3 Primary reasons for using an online subscription-based streaming service Convenience (Total) 73% Convenient (non-specific) 33% Easy 19% Do not have to leave home 11% 2.4% Percentage Using an online download store (like itunes, Amazon, Cinema now, etc.) 8. While the majority of consumers said the timeliness of viewing movie/video content was not a priority (71%) and they would not be interested in paying an incremental price increase to see the movie sooner (Chart 6), a significant percentage (29%) said they would pay more to access content sooner under certain circumstances. The majority finding also corroborates learning from PwC s recent survey on online piracy, which indicated that faster access to content did not significantly impact consumers willingness to stop pirating behavior. See PwC consumer research, Discovering behaviors and attitudes related to pirating content. Additionally, this recent study on online piracy also found that consumers would be willing to pay only a nominal amount to view content sooner no more than $3 to download a movie and less than $1 for a TV program and it must be within a 30-day window. Many consumers said if they really wanted to see the movie, they would have seen it at the theater. In terms of mobile availability, 8 of respondents would NOT pay a premium to stream movie content sooner to their phone. More than 7 are willing to wait three months or more for rental availability rather than pay a premium to see the movie sooner (Chart 7). Reasons ranged from not being in a hurry, to not having the capability, to convenience. While the majority of consumers are willing to wait to view a movie, almost 3 would pay to access the content sooner. Chart 6 Question: I don t care if I can get a DVD copy any sooner than I can now. 3 3 32.7% 70.8% 29.2% 1 18.8% 19.3% 14.9% 5.4% 8.9% PwC 5

Chart 7 Time willing to wait for rental 6 5 4 3 1 16.4% 28.3% One month 11.9% Two months 16.8% Three months 71.7% 6.9% Four months 48. No amount of time is too long to wait to avoid buying a DVD 9. In terms of purchasing a disc in order to view a movie sooner than traditionally available, a portion of the market is willing to pay a premium for this content. The largest percentage of consumers willing to pay a premium to purchase a disc range from purchasing directly from the theater immediately after seeing the movie (36%) to purchasing two weeks after release (38%). After the two-week window, the willingness to pay a premium drops off (26% willing to pay after one month). Chart 8 Question: I would pay more than I currently do for a DVD to purchase directly from the theater. 1 35.7% 64.3% 13.4% 17.8% 20.8% 23.7% Chart 9 Question: I would pay more to purchase a DVD if it was available one week after being released in the theater. 1 8.9% 42. 57. 15.8% 17.8% 15.8% 22.8% 18.9% Note: 57% would not pay more to buy a DVD if it was available ONE WEEK after theater release. However, 43% would be at least willing to pay more. Chart 10 Question: I would pay more to purchase a DVD if it was available two weeks after being released in the theater. 1 3. 38.2% 61.8% 14.4% 20.8% 23.2% 18.8% Note: 62% would not pay more to buy a DVD if it was available TWO WEEKS after theater release. However, 38% would be at least willing to pay more. 4. PwC 6

Chart 11 Question: I would pay more to purchase a DVD if it was available one month after being released in the theater. 3 1 2. 26.2% 73.8% 5.9% 18.3% 24.8% 26.2% 22.8% Note: 74% would not pay more to buy a DVD if it was available ONE MONTH after theater release. However, 26% would be at least willing to pay more. And I would wait, I think, just because, if I really want to see a movie, I can go to the show and see it or I can grab it at Blockbuster. Respondent, age 18 34 For more information: Deborah Bothun deborah.k.bothun@us.pwc.com 213.217.3302 Matthew Lieberman matthew.lieberman@us.pwc.com 213.217.3326 Todd Supplee todd.supplee@us.pwc.com 213.356.6505 Implications to your business 1. Renting continues to be the preferred method of video/movie content consumption, with lowcost subscription models (such as kiosks and mail subscriptions) representing the primary methods for renting. Given that price is the primary motivator for renting versus purchasing, movie distributors may want to consider shifting revenue exploration to focus on more consumer-efficient models driven by price rather than speed of access. 2. Content quality as it relates to an enhanced viewing experience is important and can have a persuasive impact on a consumer s decision to purchase rather than rent. This has implications for increased emphasis on Blu-ray technology, relative to marketing messages (such as gift giving or library building) and media focus. 3. A notable portion of consumers are willing to pay more to access content, although the amount they are likely willing to pay may not justify shifting business models. While the majority in these surveys were clear that they would not be interested in paying more to access content sooner, a percentage of consumers expressed willingness to pay a surcharge under certain circumstances (such as being able to access content within one to two weeks of the movie s release). Some consumers were also interested in paying more for immediate access to a movie after viewing it in the theater, which may present an opportunity for businesses to capitalize on impulse purchase decisions, such as the in the moment buzz found in the world of live performances, where CDs, discs, and T-shirts are sold immediately after the show. Content producers should continue to experiment with these release windows and price points to find the most advantageous mix. 4. There is a general lack of awareness of the digital code that can accompany a physical disc. Content producers have an opportunity to educate consumers on the benefits of using a digital distribution model. 2011 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC and PwC US refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each member firm of which is a separate legal entity. PM-11-0131_movie