Planning for TV Spectrum Repacking and the Transition to ATSC 3.0

Similar documents
Reply Comments from the Canadian Association of Broadcasters

TV Translator Relocation Grant Program

ARNOLD PORTER LLP FCC RELEASES FINAL DTV TRANSITION RULES CLIENT ADVISORY JANUARY 2008 SUMMARY OF DECISION 1

Spectrum Repack Your RF Plant and What to Consider

FCC Releases Proposals for Broadcast Spectrum Incentive Auctions

March 9, Legal Memorandum. ATSC 3.0 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Comments Due May 9; Reply Comments Due June 8

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

GET YOUR FREQ ON. A Seminar on Navigating the Wireless Spectrum Upheaval

Digital Television Transition in US

Comments of Shaw Communications Inc. Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387

FOR PUBLIC VIEWING ONLY INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387 DTV TRANSITION STATUS REPORT. All previous editions obsolete. transition. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

Start of DTV Transition 600 MHz repacking

600 Matters. A vision for collaborating with America s broadcasters

ATSC TELEVISION IN TRANSITION. Sep 20, Harmonic Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.

SEC ANALOG SPECTRUM RECOVERY: FIRM DEADLINE.

Objectives and Methodology for the Over-the-air Television Transition

Figure 1: U.S. Spectrum Configuration

PUBLIC NOTICE MEDIA BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON UPDATES TO CATALOG OF REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES. MB Docket No GN Docket No.

Implications and Optimization of Coverage and Payload for ATSC 3.0

August 7, Legal Memorandum

Analysis of Potential Repacking Issues Affecting KSAT Channel 12 San Antonio, TX January 18, 2013

LESSONS FROM THE US INCENTIVE AUCTION

The Broadcast Digital Transition

TV Spectrum Update National Translator Association Annual Meeting May 2013

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Legal Memorandum. In this issue, link to information about. Developments: FCC Proposes New Video Description Rules. April 29, 2016

July 3, 2012 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TABLE OF CONTENTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) )

Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band. Notice No. SLPB Published in the Canada Gazette, Part 1 Dated January 3, 2015

Reconfiguration Along the U.S.-Mexico Border Meeting in NPSPAC Region 3: Arizona May 16, 2013

FCC & 600 MHz Spectrum Update. Ben Escobedo Sr. Market Development

Canada Gazette - Industry Canada Notice SMBR : DTV (Digital Television) Transition Allotment Plan

All-digital planning and digital switch-over

UPDATE ON THE 2 GHZ BAS RELOCATION PROJECT

The Impact of the DTV Transition on Consumers and Consumer Choice. Overview of the DTV Transition Situation

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Boulder Thinking About The Incentive Auction

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Broadcasters Gear Up For ASTC 3.0 Television

FCC 302-FM APPLICATION FOR FM BROADCAST STATION LICENSE

BHUTAN current status for the Transition from Analogue to Digital Terrestrial Television Broadcasting

1 COPYRIGHT 2012 ALCATEL-LUCENT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

TITLE III--DIGITAL TELEVISION TRANSITION AND PUBLIC SAFETY SEC SHORT TITLE; DEFINITION.

In November, the Federal

ADVISORY Communications and Media

Telephone Facsimile

3.0 Next Generation Digital Terrestrial Broadcasting

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Via

Flashpoint The Broadcast Spectrum Auction

Reduction of operating costs

TRNSMT Festival Glasgow Green, Scotland. 29 th June 1 st July th July 8th July 2018

Metuchen Public Educational and Governmental (PEG) Television Station. Policies & Procedures

The long term future of UHF spectrum

Resolution Calling on the FCC to Facilitate the DTV Transition through Additional Consumer Education Efforts

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

FCC 302-FM APPLICATION FOR FM BROADCAST STATION LICENSE

PLANNING STUDIES INTO THE ALL-DIGITAL FUTURE AND DIGITAL SWITCH-OVER SCENARIOS

Roadmap for the MHz frequency band in the Slovak Republic

Cotton Boll Weevil Control Act

Australian Broadcasting Corporation Submission Digital Conversion of Self-Help Television Retransmission Sites

TV Districts will Discontinue Analog Television Service in place of New Digital Service Capability

T-Mobile AWS Filter Implementation Progress Report

Switching to digital television

ATSC: Digital Television Update

2010 NAB Show Call for Speakers

ELIGIBLE INTERMITTENT RESOURCES PROTOCOL

Advanced Emergency Alerting: What, Why & How A New Approach to Public Emergency Alerting Using ATSC 3.0

Federal Communications Commission

FAQ s DTT 1. What is DTT? 2. What is the difference between terrestrial television and satellite television?

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Guide to Wireless Microphone Operation. Post FCC 600 MHz Incentive Auction. By Joe Ciaudelli Sennheiser Electronic Corporation

Challenges in Implementing Television Repacking

Technical overview of the DVB-T2 switchover planning. cases studies. Digital Broadcasting Switchover Forum Johannesburg, South Africa

Before the. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Z Technology's RF NEWSLETTER DTV edition -- May 2002

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INITIAL COMMENTS OF THE WMTS COALITION

OECD COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 2001 Broadcasting Section

Start Recording on Site

COUNTDOWN TO DTV: ARE YOU READY?

ITU-D Regional Development Forum for the Arab Region: Access to spectrum, including broadcasting services trends and technologies

Canada Gazette, Part I, December 18, 2014, Notice No. SLPB Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band Eastlink s reply comments

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF

Telecommunication Development Sector

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Hearing on Crafting a Successful Incentive Auction: Stakeholders Perspectives. United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

Response to the "Consultation on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band" Canada Gazette, Part I SLPB December, Submitted By: Ontario Limited

Introduction. Introductory remarks

Hearing on Future of Emergency Alerting. United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce

700 MHz clearance programme timescale review. Review of progress, risks and readiness

Final Report. Executive Summary

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Washington Update. Bajo Control? Todo. Is Everything Under Control?

Decision on Repurposing the 600 MHz Band

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

IN THIS ISSUE HCCB AT NAB IN VEGAS TV SPECTRUM AUCTION UPDATE

COMMUNICATIONS / BROADCAST. Commission Seeks Comment on Revised Strategic Plan for

Digital Switchover Management of Transition Coverage Issues Statement

Transcription:

Planning for TV Spectrum Repacking and the Transition to ATSC 3.0 April 23, 2017 NAB Show 2017 Featuring GatesAir s Joe Seccia Manager, Market & Product Development, TV Transmission Copyright 2017 GatesAir, Inc. All rights reserved.

Planning for TV Spectrum Repacking and the Transition to ATSC 3.0 Joe Seccia GatesAir

FCC Auction Status Dashboard $10 B $20 B

TV Repack Report Card Action as a Result of the Spectrum Auction Number Stations Eliminated (Not Including Channel Sharing)* 145 Stations Moving From UHF to VHF* 30 Stations Relocated Within the UHF Band* 917 17 LB 13 HB Stations Relocated Within the VHF Bands* 70 Canadian Stations Forced to Relocate 62 * US stations Only

Will Stations Not Changing Channels Be Impacted? Possibly, if stations. Share a Tower Have stacked tower top antennas Operate on a shared antenna and transmission line with a station that is forced to change channel FM stations on a shared tower with TV Additional issues Who will pay the cost for accommodating these stations? Potential increased interference from neighboring stations (0.5% of population per other station)

We re on the clock! REPACK TIMELINE

Construction Phases April 13 July 12 April 2018 April 2019 April 2020 July 2020

April 13 July 12 Basic Timeline File electronically in LMS File early, FCC will process on a rolling basis. Expedited Processing: FCC staff expects to process qualifying CP apps within 10 business days if: Station not seeking expanded coverage beyond what was specified in the PN Seeking authorization for no more than 5% smaller than what was specified in the PN.

First Priority Window Limited to: 1. Unable to construct extraordinary technical or legal circumstances 2. Repacked stations predicted to experience a loss in excess of 1% 3. Non-repacked stations predicted to experience a loss in excess of 1% 4. A small number of specific displaced Class A stations ineligible for repacking protection. 5. Detailed deadlines for each of the above cases.

Second Window change requests Relocating stations still must file initial CP by July 12. Second window likely to open 14-30 days after 1 st priority window. Stations may use this window to request, among other things, an expanded facility, a different channel or channel swap with inmarket station. Alternate channels considered major change; subject to public notice and opportunity for petitions to deny and subject to filing fee.

Construction Period Unable to construct new facility by the phase completion deadline Unable to cease operations on pre-auction channel by the phase completion deadline Propose a creative solution to assist the transition process.

Unable to construct on time Station may seek a single extension of up to 180 days; extension application must be filed at least 90 days before deadline. Station may seek additional time beyond 180 days ONLY pursuant to tolling Tolling: Acts of God, delays due to administrative or judicial review, Extending the CP deadline does not extend the phase completion date. Unless station is granted an STA otherwise, the date the station must cease operation on it s pre-auction channel on the phase completion date.

REIMBURSEMENT

Reimbursement Catalog FCC Commissioned a Catalog of Repack Expenses Original catalog was published in 2013 Widelity Report covered equipment and services FCC P/N asked for comments Time and Technology Advanced Many transmitter technology advances made the original catalog obsolete Cost of services changed as a result of cost increases over at least 4 years. FCC Announced a revised catalog. Make sure you update! Estimates exceeding catalog advice will likely raise a red flag and will need justification.

Reimbursement Procedure Estimate of Reimbursement Costs Must be submitted via LMS by July 12. Specific cost items: Transmitter Antenna Transmission Line Tower Equipment and Rigging Outside Professional Costs Other Expenses For costs outside catalog, must submit supporting evidence and certify estimate made in good faith

Initial Allocation Reimbursement Procedure Deposited to individual treasury accounts Commercial stations: up to 80% of estimated costs Noncommercial stations: up to 90% of estimated costs Percentage will depend on total cost of repack vs. the $1.75B repack fund Progress Reports Stations must report progress on implementing their channel transition plan True-Up Broadcasters must submit documentation of actual expenses and estimated remaining expenses FCC will distribute additional funds or reclaim remaining funds, as appropriate

Reimbursement Caveats Stations indirectly impacted not eligible for reimbursement FM s on tower Canadian neighbors (62 stations!) $1.75 B broken down $1B authorized to borrow from treasury, $750m from auction proceeds Funds subject to sequester, 6 9% Key words are up to (80 % / 90% Non-Comm)

Reimbursement Example Hypothetical: Reimbursement requests total $2.5 B $1.75 B allocated, $1 B available now. Assume 9% fund sequester Your station estimate submitted is $750,000 Your initial reimbursement would be: (1 9%(1)) 2.5 $750,000 0.8 = $218,400 Second reimbursement when forward auction proceeds fund the remaining $750m (of the $1.75 B) Will congress step up and cover all the costs?

REPACK ISSUES

Repack Issues - $ Questions about whether $1.75 Billion Will Cover Reimbursement Expenses FCC Reauthorization Act of 2016 requires FCC to report statistics on the repack process including funding and acknowledges a concern on cost of the transition and the potential lack of funding. Viewer Protection Act ( Pallone bill ) would create $1 billion reserve Station doesn t necessarily get like-for-like replacement. New facility needs based on repack assignment PN.

Repack Issues - $ What do the numbers say? 987 repack stations 77 Aux facilities eligible for reimbursement 19 DTS facilities eligible for reimbursement $1.75B / 1083 = $1.6 m @ This doesn t include MVPD reimbursement Will it be enough? Will indirectly impacted stations litigate to participate in the fund?

Repack Issues - Logistics How to Repack Broadcasters Within 39 Months Case-by-case exceptions for 39 months deadline? Regional repack? Viewer Protection Act would also authorize Media Bureau to extend deadline so no station forced to stop broadcasting. https://democrats-energycommerce.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/palloneunveils-bill-to-protect-broadcast-television-viewers-and-mobile https://democratsenergycommerce.house.gov/sites/democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/files/fund_0 3_xml.pdf How to Account for Loss of Translators

Impact on Broadcast Technical Resources Large demand on consulting engineers time Structural analysis Transmitter installers Tower crews new towers and antenna installation May impact planned radio projects. May need to look for alternative resources.

CHANNEL CHANGE IMPACT ON THE TRANSMISSION PLANT

A Typical DTV Transmission Plant Basic transmission system blocks: Transmitter, comprising: Exciter Amplifier Power Supplies Control Cooling System TRANSMITTER External RF Items: Mask Filter RF Combiner Transmission line Antenna Other transmitter(s) (if applicable) ANTENNA Program Material (Video, Audio, Data) EXCITER Control RF Power Supplies POWER AMPLIFIER Cooling RF LP FILTER MASK FILTER COMBINER TRANSMISSION LINE RF

What s Impacted by Repack? If moving from an affected channel to a new one: The following items will need to be looked at for retune or replacement: ANTENNA Very Likely TRANSMITTER Possibly Other transmitter(s) (if applicable) Program Material (Video, Audio, Data) EXCITER Control RF Very Likely POWER AMPLIFIER Power Supplies Cooling RF LP FILTER MASK FILTER Very Likely COMBINER 100% TRANSMISSION LINE Likely RF

Transmitter Replacement is Likely Most 8-VSB transmitters are ~ 10-20 years old SS UHF transmitters of that era not necessarily wideband. May require new amplifier pallets, combiners or driver modules - availability of obsolete devices unlikely

Channel change effects Higher channel moving down-band Less power for equivalent coverage Larger antenna Lower channel moving up-band If station was maximized at 1 MW ERP, likely that coverage will be lost Smaller antenna

PLANNING FOR REPACK

Staying On Air During Repack Initial equipment and services requirements will be driven by phase assignments. Your station may need a temporary antenna, transmission line and replacement or standby transmitter to maintain service while rebuilding the primary transmission system

Preparing for ATSC 3.0 amid Repack Two major considerations during repack will impact your future transition to ATSC 3.0 Purchasing the right antenna Purchasing the right transmitter

ATSC 3.0 and Antenna Replacement ATSC s Physical Layer was designed to reach mobile, portable, handheld and receivers with indoor antennas. Signal density, lower C/N and improved error correction All stations should consider adding V Pol if replacing an antenna during repack. Stations may have to add additional money to the purchase. Substantial long term savings gained by not having to replace an antenna later

ATSC 3.0 and Transmitter Replacement Considerations when selecting a replacement transmitter during repack: Are the exciters upgradable to ATSC 3.0? If adding V-Pol, will the transmitter have sufficient power capability? Example: To maintain licensed H-Pol power, adding 30% V-Pol requires a 43% TPO increase. 1/0.7 = 1.43. Similarly 20% V-Pol => 1/0.8 = 1.25 Tx sizing. Stations will have to add capital to if the replacement is higher power than the current Tx Long term savings from not having to replace or add power to the transmitter when transitioning to ATSC 3.0

Key Takeaways Stations not required to change channels may be impacted Staying ON AIR during repack will most likely require some additional equipment The time allocated for CP application and reimbursement filing will likely over burden industry resources Preparation for repack should begin ASAP if not done already! Testing phases & cutover will need to be coordinated and carefully managed

Key Takeaways The Chips have fallen. Auction is over. Time to act. Repack will have a direct impact on FM stations that share towers with television stations Stations that are forced to repack should use this as an opportunity to prepare for the transition to ATSC 3.0

http://info.gatesair.com/atsc-3.0- guide-download

Additional Suggested Readings FCC References https://www.fcc.gov/about-fcc/fcc-initiatives/incentiveauctions/resources Post-Auction Transition Workshop Timelines and Deadlines https://www.fcc.gov/news-events/events/2017/03/post-incentiveauction-transition-workshop repackready.com ATSC A/300: ATSC 3.0 System ATSC.org Standards \ Candidate Standards \.

Thank You Q & A Joe Seccia