Language, power, and meaning on discourses and discourse analysis Eva Friman MSD 2012
Discourse Theory: What is a Discourse? a specific way of perceiving, talking about and understanding the world (or parts of it), based on certain assump<ons, governed and reproduced by exclusion and inclusion (power).
Discourse Theory A discourse reflects a social prac<ce connected to the use of language, paderns of ac<on, habits and conven<ons more or less governed by rules. Within a discourse, there is a certain way to speak, write, act, exclude, include, allow and forbid ways of exergng power in rela<on to others within and without the discourse.
Discourse Theory As we, according to discourse theorists, view the world through the discursive mist, the interes<ng ques<on to pose is not what is true, but what qualifies as true. What is true becomes a non- issue, and for some theorists even a ques<onable category Instead, the perspec<ve bound in life is what becomes interes<ng. Discourses thus build worlds, or rather various versions of worlds.
Discourse Theory These versions of the worlds becomes accessible as discourses, circula<ng and becoming agreements within a given context; social realiges. Discourses tend to work through construc<ng their own perspecgve as natural and inevitable.
The intellectual heritage of discourse theory post- structuralism cri<cal theory marxism social construc<vism
post- structuralism: rejects the absolute truth there is no meaning in the structure, big social science explana<ons of history are of no use; deconstruc<on as method; Foucault a discourse theorist and a poststructuralist crigcal theory: cri<cally ques<oning the social reality; social rela<onships are historically created and the researcher has an important role of making people realize this and contribu<ng to social change
marxism: as social science theory: stressing power structures focuses differences between groups (capital and labour, but now only that); exploita<on and dominance as natural rela<onships between groups social construcgvism: there is no independent reality; all knowledge is socially constructed; we think through a discursive mist and it is not possible to separate language and essence/reality
Discourse Analysis Discourse analysis can be used to study how ideas are created in texts and contexts. A text can be a book, an add, a newspaper or journal ar<cle, a conversa<on etc. The context is ins<tu<ons, organisa<ons and all other surroundings in which we live our lives.
Discourse Analysis We as individuals ourselves (as ci<zens in various roles) produce ideas in rela<on to the narra<ves and representa<ons that characterize our society. The discourse analysis studies this producgon and reproducgon and its terms, in relagon to power relagons in society.
Discourse Analysis In the discourse analysis, language is at the centre. Language forms relagty (language does not reflect reality; ideas are not mere mirrors of material circumstances). The discursive perspec<ve thus does not separate idea and relality. Ideas about something, are not possible to separate from the essence of that something.
Discourse Analysis To study boundaries and stories beyond what is true and right [ ] Analysis of social categories and connected iden<<es is a way of making clear the thought of discourses ways of defining what is possible. [- - - ] The point is [ ] that our worldviews and iden<<es could have been different through other ways of defining limits, and other characteris<cs. This means a non- essen<alist stance as a researcher. Discourse Analysis in Prac5ce (2007)
Discourse and Discourse Analysis DIMENSIONS OF THE DISCOURSE DIMENSIONS OF DISCOURSE ANALYSIS describe (textual analysis) the text interpret (to process the analysis) the discursive pracgse the sociocultural pracgse explain (social analysis) based on Fairclough (1995)
Discourse Analysis can be to analyze: basic en<<es assump<ons of natural rela<onships actors and their mo<ves (in two ways) key metaphores and rhetoric Dryzek, The Poli5cs of the Earth (1997)
basic engges The ontology of the discourse, that is, the percep<on of reality, the worldview of the discourse. for example: the nature of the economic system (subsystem or autonomous) the nature of human beings (insa<able, u<lity maximizing, egocentric, altruis<c etc.)
natural relagonships Assump<ons of rela<ons between the basic en<<es of the discourse. for example: coopera<on or compe<<on (between humans) co- evolu<on or dominance (man- nature)
actors and their mogves Assump<ons of what actors are important for development/change, and of how they func<on (the ontology of actors). And: extend the analysis to the actors who reproduce the discourse.
key metaphores and rhetoric Central metaphores and concepts within the discourse, with certain connota<ons and meaning, that o[en are used to convince. for example: limits growth trade compara<ve advantages