Value in Process : A Reply to Naples
|
|
- Aubrie Reed
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Andrew J. Kliman 139 Value in Process : A Reply to Naples As Naples notes, there is much about which we agree, especially the validity of Marx s own account of the value-price transformation. Moreover, I welcome her stress on the general issue of value conservation, rather than on the special case of uniform profitability. This serves to redirect attention to the class relations that remain intact despite reallocation of already extracted surplus-value. Her serious examination of contentious issues, however, demands not only praise but an equally serious and similarly focused reply. Such debates are needed if the Marxian critique of political economy is to continue to develop in opposition to the various economic orthodoxies. Historical Class Process vs. Technocratic Fetishism Kliman and McGlone s (1988; hereafter K&M) results contradict the view, held by Naples, Shaikh and the host of transformation problem solutions that find Marx guilty of inconsistency, that changes in values depend solely upon changes in production conditions. Why? We eschewed both In response to Michele Naples critique, the author suggests that the dispute revolves around different concepts of value. Exploring the contrast between Marx s concept of value as a selfmoving substance and technological determinist concepts, this paper further develops Kliman and McGlone s view of the value-price transformation.
2 140 Capital & Class 51 the technological determinist embodied labour theory of value in which a commodity s value is, by definition, the direct and indirect labour needed to (re)produce it under current production conditions and its market-centred abstract labour alternative. Instead, we argued that Marx s is a production-centred value theory of labour applicable solely to capitalist production s inverted relations of dead to living labour. Marx (1977 p.128) identifies abstract labour as the social substance embodied in commodities values. One can twist and turn a use-value forever without finding any (concrete) labour lurking within. It is thus fetishistic to regard labour embodiment as a suprahistorical technological reality, i.e., as the expenditure of labour common to all production. Embodied labour is instead a phantom-like objectivity that arises from the peculiar social character of the labour that produces [commodities] (ibid. pp.128, 165, emphases added). As Marx (1964 pp ) wrote in Alienated Labour : The worker puts his life into the object, and his life no longer belongs to himself but to the object The alienation of the worker in his product means not only that his labour becomes an object, assumes an external existence, but that it exists independently, outside himself, and alien to him, and that it stands opposed to him as an autonomous power. The life which he has given to the object sets itself against him as an alien and hostile force. That which is called embodiment in Capital is here referred to as life that belongs to the object, labour that exists independently, outside himself, and life given to the object. It should be clear that Marx s embodied labour theory is a theory of abstract, alienated labour. Because labour embodiment is, in this view, a peculiar social process, not a technological requirement as such, the labour embodied in a commodity need not equal the amount of labour needed to (re)produce it. Rather than being analytically derived from current production functions, value is conceived as a self-moving substance value in process (Marx 1977 p.256), extracted in historical time through the capitalist production process.
3 Value in Process 141 Value As a Self-Moving Substance While Naples argues that K&M s model fails to conserve real value, we agree that the historically determined quantum of already existing value is conserved (redistributed but unaltered in magnitude) by exchange. Yet the redistribution of the substance of value implies that some commodities now embody more of it than before, some less more or less of the labour already extracted is now alienated in them. Naples fails to recognise that, precisely because redistribution does not alter the sum of value in existence, the capital advanced to production does not cease to be a sum of [ real ] value merely because it differs from the values of its material elements, as K&M wrote. The changed labour embodiments remain quanta of the same real value substance, and each commodity s price of production is nothing but the monetary expression of its (changed) labour embodiment. Precisely because value is conserved, furthermore, it is the labour actually embodied in the constant capital, not the imaginary amount that would have been embodied in the absence of value redistribution, that is conserved preserved and transferred to the value of subsequently produced commodities. As a result, total value (constant capital plus living labour) can change even when production conditions do not. Were it otherwise, Marx s theory that the constant capital does not add to (nor subtract from) value could not be sustained. 1 And, as Naples notes perceptively, we treated variable capital and surplus-value in an identical manner, as actual, not imaginary, labour embodiments. 2 In our view, then, value real value consists always and only of the labour extracted from workers in production and embodied in commodities. Once it is recognised that K&M and the discussion above have traced the self-movement of the value substance itself, not merely changes in its monetary expression, Naples distinction between real and nominal value becomes otiose. 3 By the implicit analogy with real use-values and their nominal monetary expression, a nominal change in value seems to mean that an aggregate of use-values costs more or less labour. But so does a real change in value: when mechanisation causes use-values to cost less labour, we say their (real) value has fallen. While Naples would evidently wish to categorise as nominal changes in value only those caused by
4 142 Capital & Class 51 factors other than technical change, the concept of a nominal change refers to the effect which is identical in both cases. Naples appears to regard inflation (or deflation) as a necessary consequence of the redistribution of value in K&M s illustration probably because she regards the changes in value aggregates themselves as purely nominal ones. Yet, although I have argued that the redistribution of value will typically bring about changes, over time, in the aggregate values of commodities, this does not entail any changes in the price level. If the monetary expression of value remains constant, then a rise (fall) in aggregate value would indeed imply a corresponding amount of price inflation (deflation). K&M s illustration did indeed assume a constant monetary expression of value, but only for simplicity. It seems more plausible that the nominal price level is determined by forces apart from and independent of the transformation of values into prices of production. If this is the case, then the redistribution of value would lead to changes in aggregate value but leave the price level unchanged, implying an alteration in the monetary expression of value. The Constant Price-Expression of Living Labour Naples implies that K&M s model is inconsistent because it requires the price-expression of living labour (PELL) to be constant, though other elements of price change. Despite her emphasis on sequential as against simultaneous causation, she fails to recognise that neither the substance of value nor its monetary expression can be redistributed through exchange until after it has been extracted and embodied in commodities. The asymmetry in K&M s treatment of dead and living labour is simply a temporal one. Nor did the constancy of PELL constitute a concealed invariance postulate, as Naples implies. First, it was not imposed as an additional postulate, but necessarily results from our assumptions that both living labour and the monetary expression of value were constant over time. Second, the latter assumption implied no special constraint on PELL, but applied equally to the other elements of price as well which did change over time. 4 Third, Naples suggestion that constant value-added in price terms imposes a price level in our
5 Value in Process 143 illustration cannot be true: although PELL remained constant, the price level changed over time. Given the corresponding values, the price level (and indeed every monetary sum) were determined by the assumption of a constant monetary expression of value. Thus, if Naples uses the term invariance postulate to refer to any condition that sets the price level, this was ours. When K&M criticised invariance postulates, however, we used the term to refer to the imposition of a specific, yet arbitrarily dictated, equality between value and price aggregates, without which the value and price systems of Marx s critics would remain entirely unrelated. In contrast, ours was purely a simplifying assumption. Had we assumed a different monetary expression of value, or allowed it to vary over time, the general value and price rates of profit would remain equal, and the aggregate value/price and surplus-value/profit proportionalities would still obtain, in every period. Naples Alternative Nonequilibrium Model Naples statements that circulation [for K&M] causes the value of labour-power and unit constant capital and that we allow circulation to claim precedence over production in determining values, could mislead readers into thinking we hold that circulation processes create value. Because such displacement of the antagonism between capital and labour in production would have serious theoretical and practical consequences, I believe this issue must be treated with absolute precision. K&M in fact depicted the redistribution of value in the sphere of circulation as only one factor that can effect changes in the magnitude of particular value components and one that does not alter the total amount of value already extracted or produce any new value. All new value was generated in production, through the renewed extraction of living labour from workers. Yet Naples regards this as the precedence of circulation over production, and argues that K&M s model fails to conserve real value. The reason is clearly that she believes not only that the redistribution of value should conserve already existing value, but also that alternative distributions of value should have absolutely no effect on subsequent value aggregates. In this conception, production takes precedence
6 144 Capital & Class 51 not when the capital-labour antagonism is made central to theory, but when technology is privileged: real values should be determined solely by production conditions. While Naples believes that her view is consistent with Marx, and K&M s is not, Marx argues to the contrary that the cost price [can] diverge from the value sum of the elements of which this component of the price of production is composed, even in the case of commodities that are produced by capitals of average composition. Let us assume that the average composition is 80 c + 20 v. the 80 c may be greater or less than the value of c, the constant capital, since this c is composed of commodities whose prices of production are different from their values. The 20 v [variable capital] can similarly diverge from its value, if the spending on wages on consumption involves commodities whose prices of production are different from their values (Marx 1981 p.309). The crucial point is that the feedback of prices on subsequent value aggregates can affect even capitals of average composition. For if such capitals can be affected, then so can the total capital, of which they are but miniature versions. If, moreover, the cost price as a whole can diverge from its corresponding value, the deviations affecting c and v are not mutually compensating. Hence, Marx s text does not support Naples claim that the redistribution of value must leave subsequent value aggregates unaltered. Even according to her own concepts of value and its redistribution, such conservation is not generally possible. Naples (1989) concludes otherwise only because she examines a special case which conforms to two conditions: (1) the input and output values of capital-goods are equal, and (2) balanced growth the ratio of capital-goods to wage-goods is the same for inputs as for outputs. Table 1, which presents two examples of her transformation model, will help make this clear. Departments I, II, and III produce capital-goods, wagegoods, and luxury goods, respectively. 5 Given Naples concepts, redistribution does conserve values intertemporally in example A, which conforms to conditions (1) and (2). The output prices of Departments I and II, 234 and 126, become the C and V of the next period and, since Naples would argue that
7 Value in Process 145 Table 1. Naples Nonequilibrium Transformation Procedure Example Department Constant Capital Variable Capital Surplus Value output Value Price Profit Price-value ratio real profit A: Balanced Growth C V S I II III total I B: Unbalanced Growth II III total Notes: 1. All figures except ratios are socially-necessary labour-hours. 2. C = constant capital; V = variable capital; S = surplus-value. 3. To calculate real profit, C and V are revalued in accordance with the pricevalue ratios. the 126 V is only the nominal value of labour-power, but that its real value remains 180, surplus-value (S) remains 180. Total value is conserved in Naples sense, because C+V+S equals 540 ( ), as it would had redistribution not occurred. In example B, however, condition (2) is violated. If the total product is realised, 6 the next period s C and V are 247 and 126 and, since realisation of the total product implies unchanged extraction of living labour, Naples would again say that S remains 180. Here, total value is not conserved in Naples sense, because C+V+S equals 553 ( ), while it would have equalled 550 ( ) had redistribution not occurred. In fact, in example B and in general, the value aggregates can remain unaltered only if no redistribution occurs! Naples model suffers from such flaws because her comparative static idea of conservation clashes with the dynamic, historical process of valuation into which she imports it. Her formalist methodology prevented her from undertaking the dialectical tracing of value in process needed to comprehend how value is both conserved and not conserved unaltered by any act of exchange but changing over time. Naples instead tries to impose upon the data, by means of a priori invariance postulates, her preconception that value is determined by production conditions alone. Her model in this respect replicates the method, and the technological determinist
8 146 Capital & Class 51 concept of value, of traditional transformation problem solutions. And just as they sever all intrinsic links between values and prices which differ from values, Naples model must do so as well or fall into self-contradiction. The Rate(s) of Profit Naples statement that K&M agree with Shaikh (1977) that the Neo-Ricardian model is ultimately right on the magnitude of the profit rate [and Marx] is ultimately wrong is completely unjustified. Her less extravagant claim that we tried to reconcile the Marxian and Sraffian profit rates is also incorrect. By tracing value in process, we showed that the general profit rate is always the ratio of surplus-value to the capital-value advanced, even when it differs from the profit rate corresponding to the technologically determined value system of the transformation problem, and even when the mathematical tautologies of the Sraffian equilibrium price system obtain. Hence, rather than trying to reconcile Marx s procedure with Sraffian solutions a la Shaikh, we were undermining the Sraffian model. It is true that our illustration depicted a convergence of the Marxian profit rate to the Sraffian rate. Yet once our fundamental conception of value and price determination our general model is disentangled from that particular illustration, such convergence does not validate Naples claims. Although she recognises that simple reproduction, constant technology, and uniform profitability are special assumptions bearing no intrinsic relation to the value-price transformation, she nonetheless conflates an illustration that employed these assumptions with our general model. She cannot have it both ways. Thus, while K&M presented an illustration that converged to static equilibrium (again, to demonstrate that the Sraffian solutions fail to refute Marx s transformation procedure), this does not mean that our model reconciles Marx with the Sraffians, even in a quantitative sense. Any apparent reconciliation was only an incidental byproduct of the illustration, because the model vindicates Marx s procedure and results without relying on i.e., even in the absence of that demonstration and the specific assumptions that produced convergence.
9 Indeed, once the specific assumption of constant technology is dropped, K&M s model demonstrates not a convergence, but a systematic divergence, of the Marxian and Sraffian profit rates. Assuming continuous mechanisation instead of constant technology, but employing the same conception of value in process put forth in K&M and reviewed here, I (Kliman 1988) have demonstrated that the former may fall under conditions in which the latter must rise; if extraction of living labour fails to increase over time, the former must eventually fall to zero despite any and all increases in productivity and the rate of exploitation. Hence, in opposition to the Okishio Theorem (Okishio 1961), which employs the Sraffian model in its attempt to disprove Marx s theory that mechanisation causes the rate of profit to fall, our model vindicates Marx here as well. These results stem from the fundamental irreconcilability of the concept of value in process and the static equilibrium, technological determinist character of the Sraffian model. Our model is likewise independent of the assumption of uniform profitability. 7 We followed Marx in abstracting from the real inequality in profit rates simply because we sought to defend his account of the value-price transformation. Because we did not seek to advance over Marx or to model the actual operation of the capitalist economy, the uniform profitability assumption should not be construed as a claim that it is attained in reality. I thus find Naples recognition that discrepancies between the Marxian and Sraffian profit rates can persist due to nonuniform profitability a welcome advance in the literature, not a challenge to K&M s model. Yet uniform profitability is theoretically possible, and its attainment under conditions of constant technology will produce the convergence of the Marxian and Sraffian profit rates, even if it is the reproduction cost-based profit rate (Naples real rate) instead of the historical cost-based profit rate (Naples nominal rate) that is equalised. 8 & 9 For instance, had K&M assumed the uniformity of the former rather than the latter, the convergence of relative prices and the general real rate of profit to the Sraffian equilibrium would have been immediate, but our results would have remained identical in all other important respects. It is thus difficult to understand why Naples places such great emphasis on the contrast between the two rates, or why she implies that our model depends crucially on the assumption of a uniform nominal rate. Value in Process 147
10 148 Capital & Class 51 She does raise thought-provoking questions concerning the legitimacy of this assumption. I cannot resolve this issue definitively here, but offer only a few comments. The profit rate that capitalist competition tends to equalise, real or nominal, depends on what capitalists seek to maximize. Naples appears to suggest that they quest after luxury goods. If that is correct, then competition will, as she notes, tend to yield uniform real profit rates. Yet equal real profit rates generally imply that capitals realise disproportionate amounts of actually existing surplus-value. Thus, if capitalists quest after surplus-value, wealth in the abstract, and finance luxury consumption from residual proceeds after requisite outlays for capital have been made, as depicted in K&M, then competition will tend to yield uniform nominal profit rates. There should be little doubt concerning Marx s views on this matter. He insisted repeatedly that the appropriation of ever more wealth in the abstract is the sole driving force Use-values must therefore never be treated as the immediate aim of the capitalist (Marx 1977 p.254). And in the only passage in which, to my knowledge, he addresses the question of real and nominal profit explicitly, Marx writes that abstract enrichment is solely expressed as such in money, and quotes Thomas Chalmers approvingly: The great object of the monied capitalist, in fact, is to add to the nominal amount of his fortune (Marx 1988 p.100). Conclusion K&M showed that Marx s account of the value-price transformation no longer seems internally inconsistent once it is conceived as a dialectical self-development in which value becomes price of production, rather than as a failed attempt to reconcile self-contained systems of values and prices in a formalistic manner. Although Naples has echoed the charge of internal inconsistency against us, not Marx, this reply has shown that dialectics vs. analytical formalism remains at issue. By tracing value as a self-moving substance, unencumbered by technological determinist preconceptions imposed as a priori axioms, the reply has revealed the cogency and consistency of our model and helped elucidate its radical break from Sraffianism. In contrast, while Naples Nonequilibrium model
11 Value in Process 149 also successfully challenges the criticisms lodged against Marx s transformation procedure in some respects, especially insofar as such criticisms rest on the assumption of uniform profitability, it ultimately suffers either from internal inconsistency or an inability to account for prices that deviate from values. Ted McGlone is not responsible for any statements contained herein, even when they refer to jointly held views. I wish to thank him, along with Michele Naples, Alfredo Saad-Filho, the editors of Capital&Class, and participants in the 1992 Eastern Economic Association panel on State Capitalism and the 1990s for their helpful comments. Acknowledgement 1. If, for example, 20 labour-hours were originally embodied in constant capital but, after redistribution, only 15 labour-hours are now embodied, and if 10 living labour-hours are added, the actual value of output is 25. Only by maintaining that the use of constant capital creates 5 extra labour-hours or by denying that price movements redistribute value can one claim that the value of output is Naples is not quite correct that K&M s model is unique in making the rate of exploitation endogenous to the pricing procedure ; Giussani ( ) has recently proposed a substantially identical model. Also, after our paper was accepted, Glick and Ehrbar (1987) published an iterative version of the new solution which similarly recognises that variable capital and surplus-value are actual labour embodiments. Yet, retaining an ahistorical, technological determinist conception of value, they fall into inconsistency by failing to recognise that constant capital is likewise the labour actually embodied in capital-goods and thus reject Marx s account as self-contradictory. 3. Naples is correct to criticise K&M s imprecise discussion of money. Despite our mention of the value of money, we intended to posit the existence only of a money of account, not commodity money (and we did not assume that gold is money, as Naples states). This terminological imprecision has no bearing on the other issues under contention. I refer throughout this reply to money of account that expresses value. Notes
12 150 Capital & Class That aggregate prices underwent change, despite a constant relation between the monetary unit and each labour-hour of value, should be sufficient to demonstrate that the price level changes were likewise changes in real value. 5. I also follow Naples in imposing two invariance postulates: total price is the monetary expression of total value, and total real profit (total price minus reproduction costs) is the monetary expression of total surplus value. For simplicity, Table 1 ignores the monetary expression of value, depicting the labour-time equivalents of prices and profits. 6. An infinite number of growth combinations would make its realisation possible. One possibility is that Department I expands by 45%, II contracts by 46.67%, and III expands by 5%. 7. Although Naples states that K&M motivated this assumption in terms of its association with equilibrium, the passage to which she refers merely argued that, while prices which assure equal profitability require the equilibration of supplies and demands, they do not require stationary prices. 8. Naples (1989) finds uniform profitability to be impossible, not because she assumes capitalists seek the highest real profit rate, as some readers of her present critique may infer, but because she imposes invariance postulates that prevent the redistribution of value from altering the value of the capital advanced. 9. Although Naples uses the same terminology in both cases, the controversy over which profit rate (if either) should be assumed to be uniform is unrelated to the question of whether K&M s values are real or nominal. References Giussani, P. ( ) The determination of prices of production in International Journal of Political Economy, Vol.21 No.4, pp Glick, M. and H. Ehrbar (1987) The transformation problem: an obituary in Australian Economic Papers, Vol.26 No.4, pp Kliman, A.J. (1988) The profit rate under continuous technological change in Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol.20 Nos.2&3, pp Kliman, A.J. and T. McGlone (1988) The transformation nonproblem and the non-transformation problem in Capital&Class 35, Summer, pp
13 Value in Process 151 Marx, K. (1964) Alienated labour in T.B. Bottomore [ed.] Karl Marx: Early writings. McGraw-Hill, New York. (1977) Capital: a critique of political economy, Vol.I. Vintage, New York. (1981) Capital: a critique of political economy, Vol.III. Vintage, New York. (1988) Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: collected works, Vol.30. Progress Publishers, Moscow. Naples, M.I. (1989) A radical economic revision of the transformation problem in Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol.21 Nos.1&2, pp Okishio, N. (1961) Technical changes and the rate of profit in University Economic Review 7, pp Shaikh, A. (1977) Marx s theory of value and the transformation problem in J. Schwartz [ed.] The Subtle Anatomy of Capitalism. Goodyear, Santa Monica, CA.
Value and Price in Marx's Capital [1] David Yaffe, Revolutionary Communist, n 1, 1974, pp31-49.
Value and Price in Marx's Capital [1] David Yaffe, Revolutionary Communist, n 1, 1974, pp31-49. 'Has Struve, who has managed to discern the "harmfulness" (sic!) of repeating Marx, failed to notice the
More information1. Three aspects of Marx s LTV: reconstruction from the orthodox point of view
The transformation problem in the epistemological and conceptual framework of Marx s object Marko Kržan Although Marx s theory of class society and exploitation is no doubt closely related to his economic
More informationThe concept of capital and the determination of the general and uniform rates of profit: a reappraisal
The concept of capital and the determination of the general and uniform rates of profit: a reappraisal Mario L. Robles Báez 1 Introduction In the critique of political economy literature, the concepts
More informationMarx s Theory of Money. Tomás Rotta University of Greenwich, London, UK GPERC marx21.com
Marx s Theory of Money Tomás Rotta University of Greenwich, London, UK GPERC marx21.com May 2016 Marx s Theory of Money Lecture Plan 1. Introduction 2. Marxist terminology 3. Marx and Hegel 4. Marx s system
More informationOF MARX'S THEORY OF MONEY
EXAMINATION 1 A CRITIQUE OF BENETTI AND CARTELIER'S CRITICAL OF MARX'S THEORY OF MONEY Abelardo Mariña-Flores and Mario L. Robles-Báez 1 In part three of Merchands, salariat et capitalistes (1980), Benetti
More information8. The dialectic of labor and time
8. The dialectic of labor and time Marx in unfolding the category of capital, then, relates the historical dynamic of capitalist society as well as the industrial form of production to the structure of
More informationThe Meaning of Abstract and Concrete in Hegel and Marx
The Meaning of Abstract and Concrete in Hegel and Marx Andy Blunden, June 2018 The classic text which defines the meaning of abstract and concrete for Marx and Hegel is the passage known as The Method
More informationOn the Identity of Value and Labour. A Defence of Intrinsic Value. Philip Dunn. Independent Economist.
On the Identity of Value and Labour A Defence of Intrinsic Value Philip Dunn Independent Economist Email: pscumnud@dircon.co.uk October 2002 Abstract The notion of intrinsic value is examined in the light
More informationMarx & Primitive Accumulation. Week Two Lectures
Marx & Primitive Accumulation Week Two Lectures Labour Power and the Circulation Process Before we get into Marxist Historiography (as well as who Marx even was), we are going to spend some time understanding
More information1/8. Axioms of Intuition
1/8 Axioms of Intuition Kant now turns to working out in detail the schematization of the categories, demonstrating how this supplies us with the principles that govern experience. Prior to doing so he
More informationChapter 2: Karl Marx Test Bank
Chapter 2: Karl Marx Test Bank Multiple-Choice Questions: 1. Which of the following is a class in capitalism according to Marx? a) Protestants b) Wage laborers c) Villagers d) All of the above 2. Marx
More informationREVIEW ARTICLE THE VALUE OF VALUE
REVIEW ARTICLE THE VALUE OF VALUE REREADING CAPITAL By Ben Fine and Laurence Harris. Macmillan (London, 1979), 184 pp., 7.95 hb., 3.50 pb. By Simon Clarke. 'What we have we prize not to the worth Whiles
More information1/8. The Third Paralogism and the Transcendental Unity of Apperception
1/8 The Third Paralogism and the Transcendental Unity of Apperception This week we are focusing only on the 3 rd of Kant s Paralogisms. Despite the fact that this Paralogism is probably the shortest of
More information1/10. The A-Deduction
1/10 The A-Deduction Kant s transcendental deduction of the pure concepts of understanding exists in two different versions and this week we are going to be looking at the first edition version. After
More informationThe Transformation Problem: A Tale of Two Interpretations
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive The Transformation Problem: A Tale of Two Interpretations David Bieri Virginia Tech 15. May 2007 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/3895/ MPRA Paper No. 3895, posted
More informationIs Capital a Thing? Remarks on Piketty s Concept of Capital
564090CRS0010.1177/0896920514564090Critical SociologyLotz research-article2014 Article Is Capital a Thing? Remarks on Piketty s Concept of Capital Critical Sociology 2015, Vol. 41(2) 375 383 The Author(s)
More informationGender, the Family and 'The German Ideology'
Gender, the Family and 'The German Ideology' Wed, 06/03/2009-21:18 Anonymous By Heather Tomanovsky The German Ideology (1845), often seen as the most materialistic of Marx s early writings, has been taken
More informationIs Hegel s Logic Logical?
Is Hegel s Logic Logical? Sezen Altuğ ABSTRACT This paper is written in order to analyze the differences between formal logic and Hegel s system of logic and to compare them in terms of the trueness, the
More informationMarx, Gender, and Human Emancipation
The U.S. Marxist-Humanists organization, grounded in Marx s Marxism and Raya Dunayevskaya s ideas, aims to develop a viable vision of a truly new human society that can give direction to today s many freedom
More informationCulture in Social Theory
Totem: The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 8 6-19-2011 Culture in Social Theory Greg Beckett The University of Western Ontario Follow this and additional
More informationPart One Commodities and Money
Part One Commodities and Money 1 Chapter One: The Commodity 1 The two factors of a commodity: use-value and value (the substance of value and the magnitude of value) I Why start with the commodity? 1 Marx
More informationLogic and Dialectics in Social Science Part I: Dialectics, Social Phenomena and Non-Equilibrium
03-090306-Guglielmo Carchedi.qxd 3/17/2008 4:36 PM Page 495 Critical Sociology 34(4) 495-519 http://crs.sagepub.com Logic and Dialectics in Social Science Part I: Dialectics, Social Phenomena and Non-Equilibrium
More informationYEAR 2001 MINI-CONFERENCE ON VALUE THEORY AND THE WORLD ECONOMY Crowne Plaza Hotel, Manhattan, February 23-25th 2001
YEAR 2001 MINI-CONFERENCE ON VALUE THEORY AND THE WORLD ECONOMY Crowne Plaza Hotel, Manhattan, February 23-25th 2001 Session 3: Theories of Money and Value I Marx s Critique of (Ricardian) Political Economy,
More informationBook Reviews: 'The Concept of Nature in Marx', & 'Alienation - Marx s Conception of Man in Capitalist Society'
Book Reviews: 'The Concept of Nature in Marx', & 'Alienation - Marx s Conception of Man in Capitalist Society' Who can read Marx? 'The Concept of Nature in Marx', by Alfred Schmidt. Published by NLB. 3.25.
More informationWas Marx an Ecologist?
Was Marx an Ecologist? Karl Marx has written voluminous texts related to capitalist political economy, and his work has been interpreted and utilised in a variety of ways. A key (although not commonly
More informationA Soviet View of Structuralism, Althusser, and Foucault
A Soviet View of Structuralism, Althusser, and Foucault By V. E. Koslovskii Excerpts from the article Structuralizm I dialekticheskii materialism, Filosofskie Nauki, 1970, no. 1, pp. 177-182. This article
More informationA Contribution to the Critique of the Political Economy of Academic Labour
A Contribution to the Critique of the Political Economy of Academic Labour Prof. Richard Hall, De Montfort, rhall@dmu.ac.uk @hallymk1 Joss Winn, Lincoln, jwinn@lincoln.ac.uk @josswinn Academic Identities
More informationLouis Althusser s Centrism
Louis Althusser s Centrism Anthony Thomson (1975) It is economism that identifies eternally in advance the determinatecontradiction-in-the last-instance with the role of the dominant contradiction, which
More informationTHESIS MIND AND WORLD IN KANT S THEORY OF SENSATION. Submitted by. Jessica Murski. Department of Philosophy
THESIS MIND AND WORLD IN KANT S THEORY OF SENSATION Submitted by Jessica Murski Department of Philosophy In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Colorado State University
More informationAndrew Brown. The Labour Theory of Value: Materialist versus Idealist Interpretations ABSTRACT
1 Andrew Brown The Labour Theory of Value: Materialist versus Idealist Interpretations ABSTRACT This paper presents a novel interpretation and affirmation of Marx s initial arguments for the labour theory
More informationDawn M. Phillips The real challenge for an aesthetics of photography
Dawn M. Phillips 1 Introduction In his 1983 article, Photography and Representation, Roger Scruton presented a powerful and provocative sceptical position. For most people interested in the aesthetics
More informationfoucault s archaeology science and transformation David Webb
foucault s archaeology science and transformation David Webb CLOSING REMARKS The Archaeology of Knowledge begins with a review of methodologies adopted by contemporary historical writing, but it quickly
More informationConclusion. One way of characterizing the project Kant undertakes in the Critique of Pure Reason is by
Conclusion One way of characterizing the project Kant undertakes in the Critique of Pure Reason is by saying that he seeks to articulate a plausible conception of what it is to be a finite rational subject
More informationVerity Harte Plato on Parts and Wholes Clarendon Press, Oxford 2002
Commentary Verity Harte Plato on Parts and Wholes Clarendon Press, Oxford 2002 Laura M. Castelli laura.castelli@exeter.ox.ac.uk Verity Harte s book 1 proposes a reading of a series of interesting passages
More informationGeorg Simmel's Sociology of Individuality
Catherine Bell November 12, 2003 Danielle Lindemann Tey Meadow Mihaela Serban Georg Simmel's Sociology of Individuality Simmel's construction of what constitutes society (itself and as the subject of sociological
More informationA Recent Controversy on Marxian Fundamental Theorem in Japan
A Recent Controversy on Marxian Fundamental Theorem in Japan Tadasu MATSUO (Kurume University, Japan) 1. Introduction I introduce in this paper an outline of a recent controversy in Japan, which is carried
More informationCritical Political Economy of Communication and the Problem of Method
Critical Political Economy of Communication and the Problem of Method Brice Nixon University of La Verne, Communications Department, La Verne, USA, bln222@nyu.edu Abstract: This chapter argues that the
More informationThe Commodity-Form and the Dialectical Method: On the Structure of Marx s Exposition in Chapter 1 of Capital GUIDO STAROSTA*
COMMODITY-FORM AND Science DIALECTICAL & Society, Vol. 72, METHOD No. 3, July 2008, 295 318 The Commodity-Form and the Dialectical Method: On the Structure of Marx s Exposition in Chapter 1 of Capital
More informationARISTOTLE AND THE UNITY CONDITION FOR SCIENTIFIC DEFINITIONS ALAN CODE [Discussion of DAVID CHARLES: ARISTOTLE ON MEANING AND ESSENCE]
ARISTOTLE AND THE UNITY CONDITION FOR SCIENTIFIC DEFINITIONS ALAN CODE [Discussion of DAVID CHARLES: ARISTOTLE ON MEANING AND ESSENCE] Like David Charles, I am puzzled about the relationship between Aristotle
More informationPolitical Economy I, Fall 2014
Political Economy I, Fall 2014 Professor David Kotz Thompson 936 413-545-0739 dmkotz@econs.umass.edu Office Hours: Tuesdays 10 AM to 12 noon Information on Index Cards Your name Address Telephone Email
More informationImmanuel Kant Critique of Pure Reason
Immanuel Kant Critique of Pure Reason THE A PRIORI GROUNDS OF THE POSSIBILITY OF EXPERIENCE THAT a concept, although itself neither contained in the concept of possible experience nor consisting of elements
More informationTHE RELATIONS BETWEEN ETHICS AND ECONOMICS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AYRES AND WEBER S PERSPECTIVES. By Nuria Toledano and Crispen Karanda
PhilosophyforBusiness Issue80 11thFebruary2017 http://www.isfp.co.uk/businesspathways/ THE RELATIONS BETWEEN ETHICS AND ECONOMICS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AYRES AND WEBER S PERSPECTIVES By Nuria
More informationOn Essence and Appearance
On Essence and Appearance Marx once observed 1 that alle Wissenschaft wäre überflüssig, wenn die Erscheinungsform und das Wesen der Dinge unmittelbar zusammenfielen that all science would be superfluous
More informationLecture 10 Popper s Propensity Theory; Hájek s Metatheory
Lecture 10 Popper s Propensity Theory; Hájek s Metatheory Patrick Maher Philosophy 517 Spring 2007 Popper s propensity theory Introduction One of the principal challenges confronting any objectivist theory
More informationIX Colóquio Internacional Marx e Engels GT 4 - Economia e política
IX Colóquio Internacional Marx e Engels GT 4 - Economia e política Anticipation and inevitability: reification and totalization of time in contemporary capitalism Ana Flavia Badue PhD student Anthropology
More informationPower: Interpersonal, Organizational, and Global Dimensions Monday, 31 October 2005
Power: Interpersonal, Organizational, and Global Dimensions Monday, 31 October 2005 TOPIC: How do power differentials arise? Lessons from social theory; Marx continued. IDEOLOGY behaviorist to mid 20th
More informationWeek 25 Deconstruction
Theoretical & Critical Perspectives Week 25 Key Questions What is deconstruction? Where does it come from? How does deconstruction conceptualise language? How does deconstruction see literature and history?
More informationNaïve realism without disjunctivism about experience
Naïve realism without disjunctivism about experience Introduction Naïve realism regards the sensory experiences that subjects enjoy when perceiving (hereafter perceptual experiences) as being, in some
More informationReconstructing Value -Form Analysis. Michael Eldred and Marnie Hanlon
Reconstructing Value -Form Analysis Michael Eldred and Marnie Hanlon A common feature of interpretations of Marx's theory of value is the understanding of value as embodied labour. On this understanding
More informationMetaphors we live by. Structural metaphors. Orientational metaphors. A personal summary
Metaphors we live by George Lakoff, Mark Johnson 1980. London, University of Chicago Press A personal summary This highly influential book was written after the two authors met, in 1979, with a joint interest
More informationNecessity in Kant; Subjective and Objective
Necessity in Kant; Subjective and Objective DAVID T. LARSON University of Kansas Kant suggests that his contribution to philosophy is analogous to the contribution of Copernicus to astronomy each involves
More informationLecture 24 Sociology 621 December 12, 2005 MYSTIFICATION
Lecture 24 Sociology 621 December 12, 2005 MYSTIFICATION In the next several sections we will follow up n more detail the distinction Thereborn made between three modes of interpellation: what is, what
More informationSocial and Physical Form: Ilyenkov on the Ideal and Marx on the Value-Form Andrew Chitty, University of Sussex
Social and Physical Form: Ilyenkov on the Ideal and Marx on the Value-Form Andrew Chitty, University of Sussex in Evald Ilyenkov s Philosophy Revisited, ed. V. Oittinen, Kikimora Publications, Helsinki,
More informationThe Doctrine of the Mean
The Doctrine of the Mean In subunit 1.6, you learned that Aristotle s highest end for human beings is eudaimonia, or well-being, which is constituted by a life of action by the part of the soul that has
More informationThe Object Oriented Paradigm
The Object Oriented Paradigm By Sinan Si Alhir (October 23, 1998) Updated October 23, 1998 Abstract The object oriented paradigm is a concept centric paradigm encompassing the following pillars (first
More informationThe Rich Human Being: Marx and the Concept of Real Human. (Paper for Presentation at Marx Conference, 4-8 May 2004 Havana,
1 The Rich Human Being: Marx and the Concept of Real Human Development (Paper for Presentation at Marx Conference, 4-8 May 2004 Havana, Cuba) Michael A. Lebowitz Canada With the introduction of the UN
More informationReply to Stalnaker. Timothy Williamson. In Models and Reality, Robert Stalnaker responds to the tensions discerned in Modal Logic
1 Reply to Stalnaker Timothy Williamson In Models and Reality, Robert Stalnaker responds to the tensions discerned in Modal Logic as Metaphysics between contingentism in modal metaphysics and the use of
More informationThe Concept of Nature
The Concept of Nature The Concept of Nature The Tarner Lectures Delivered in Trinity College B alfred north whitehead University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom Cambridge University
More informationCategories and Schemata
Res Cogitans Volume 1 Issue 1 Article 10 7-26-2010 Categories and Schemata Anthony Schlimgen Creighton University Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans Part of the
More informationBas C. van Fraassen, Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective, Oxford University Press, 2008.
Bas C. van Fraassen, Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective, Oxford University Press, 2008. Reviewed by Christopher Pincock, Purdue University (pincock@purdue.edu) June 11, 2010 2556 words
More informationSummary of the Transcendental Ideas
Summary of the Transcendental Ideas I. Rational Physics The General Idea Unity in the synthesis of appearances. Quantity (Axioms of Intuition) Theoretical Standpoint As regards their intuition, all appearances
More informationIn Defense of the Contingently Nonconcrete
In Defense of the Contingently Nonconcrete Bernard Linsky Philosophy Department University of Alberta and Edward N. Zalta Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford University In Actualism
More informationSidestepping the holes of holism
Sidestepping the holes of holism Tadeusz Ciecierski taci@uw.edu.pl University of Warsaw Institute of Philosophy Piotr Wilkin pwl@mimuw.edu.pl University of Warsaw Institute of Philosophy / Institute of
More informationClassical Political Economy, Ethics, Metaphysics and Knowledge-Based Economy
Classical Political Economy, Ethics, Metaphysics and Knowledge-Based Economy OR Demystifying the Mystified 1 (Some considerations on commodified knowledge and the self) DOĞAN GÖÇMEN I. Introduction The
More informationRoland Barthes s The Death of the Author essay provides a critique of the way writers
Roland Barthes s The Death of the Author essay provides a critique of the way writers and readers view a written or spoken piece. Throughout the piece Barthes makes the argument for writers to give up
More informationRousseau on the Nature of Nature and Political Philosophy
Rousseau on the Nature of Nature and Political Philosophy Our theme is the relation between modern reductionist science and political philosophy. The question is whether political philosophy can meet the
More informationKant IV The Analogies The Schematism updated: 2/2/12. Reading: 78-88, In General
Kant IV The Analogies The Schematism updated: 2/2/12 Reading: 78-88, 100-111 In General The question at this point is this: Do the Categories ( pure, metaphysical concepts) apply to the empirical order?
More informationThe Proof is in the Pudding
The Proof is in the Pudding On the Necessity of Presupposition in Marx s Critical Method Abstract: Marx s labour theory of value cannot be understood without the critique of the value theories of classical
More informationDIALECTICS OF ECONOMICAL BASE AND SOCIO-CULTURAL SUPERSTRUCTURE: A MARXIST PERSPECTIVE
DIALECTICS OF ECONOMICAL BASE AND SOCIO-CULTURAL SUPERSTRUCTURE: A MARXIST PERSPECTIVE Prasanta Banerjee PhD Research Scholar, Department of Philosophy and Comparative Religion, Visva- Bharati University,
More informationOntology as a formal one. The language of ontology as the ontology itself: the zero-level language
Ontology as a formal one The language of ontology as the ontology itself: the zero-level language Vasil Penchev Bulgarian Academy of Sciences: Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge: Dept of
More informationLouisa Hadley and Elizabeth Ho s Thatcher and After: Margaret Thatcher and her Afterlife
1 Thatcher and After: Margaret Thatcher and Her Afterlife in Contemporary Culture, ed. Louisa Hadley and Elizabeth Ho (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010). 55.12 / $81.26 (Hardback). pp. 249. ISBN 978-0230233317
More information1/9. The B-Deduction
1/9 The B-Deduction The transcendental deduction is one of the sections of the Critique that is considerably altered between the two editions of the work. In a work published between the two editions of
More informationMonadology and Music 2: Leibniz s Demon
Monadology and Music 2: Leibniz s Demon Soshichi Uchii (Kyoto University, Emeritus) Abstract Drawing on my previous paper Monadology and Music (Uchii 2015), I will further pursue the analogy between Monadology
More informationAristotle on the Human Good
24.200: Aristotle Prof. Sally Haslanger November 15, 2004 Aristotle on the Human Good Aristotle believes that in order to live a well-ordered life, that life must be organized around an ultimate or supreme
More informationThe Powers of the Exploited and the Social Ontology of Praxis
triplec 16(2): 415-423, 2018 http://www.triple-c.at The Powers of the Exploited and the Social Ontology of Praxis Michael Hardt and Toni Negri Abstract: This contribution is the first part of a debate
More informationChapter 2 Christopher Alexander s Nature of Order
Chapter 2 Christopher Alexander s Nature of Order Christopher Alexander is an oft-referenced icon for the concept of patterns in programming languages and design [1 3]. Alexander himself set forth his
More informationMAURICE MANDELBAUM HISTORY, MAN, & REASON A STUDY IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY THOUGHT THE JOHNS HOPKINS PRESS: BALTIMORE AND LONDON
MAURICE MANDELBAUM HISTORY, MAN, & REASON A STUDY IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY THOUGHT THE JOHNS HOPKINS PRESS: BALTIMORE AND LONDON Copyright 1971 by The Johns Hopkins Press All rights reserved Manufactured
More informationScientific Philosophy
Scientific Philosophy Gustavo E. Romero IAR-CONICET/UNLP, Argentina FCAGLP, UNLP, 2018 Philosophy of mathematics The philosophy of mathematics is the branch of philosophy that studies the philosophical
More informationA Note on the Ongoing Processes of Commodification: From the Audience Commodity to the Social Factory
ISSN 1726-670X http://www.triple-c.at A Note on the Ongoing Processes of Commodification: From the Audience Commodity to the Social Factory Faculty of Social Sciences, Social Communication Research Centre,
More informationWhat Can Experimental Philosophy Do? David Chalmers
What Can Experimental Philosophy Do? David Chalmers Cast of Characters X-Phi: Experimental Philosophy E-Phi: Empirical Philosophy A-Phi: Armchair Philosophy Challenges to Experimental Philosophy Empirical
More informationLANGUAGE THROUGH THE LENS OF HERACLITUS'S LOGOS
LANGUAGE THROUGH THE LENS OF HERACLITUS'S LOGOS NATASHA WILTZ ABSTRACT This paper deals with Heraclitus s understanding of Logos and how his work can help us understand various components of language:
More informationSUMMARY BOETHIUS AND THE PROBLEM OF UNIVERSALS
SUMMARY BOETHIUS AND THE PROBLEM OF UNIVERSALS The problem of universals may be safely called one of the perennial problems of Western philosophy. As it is widely known, it was also a major theme in medieval
More informationDesigning a Deductive Foundation System
Designing a Deductive Foundation System Roger Bishop Jones Date: 2009/05/06 10:02:41 Abstract. A discussion of issues in the design of formal logical foundation systems suitable for use in machine supported
More informationKant: Notes on the Critique of Judgment
Kant: Notes on the Critique of Judgment First Moment: The Judgement of Taste is Disinterested. The Aesthetic Aspect Kant begins the first moment 1 of the Analytic of Aesthetic Judgment with the claim that
More informationNotes on Gadamer, The Relevance of the Beautiful
Notes on Gadamer, The Relevance of the Beautiful The Unity of Art 3ff G. sets out to argue for the historical continuity of (the justification for) art. 5 Hegel new legitimation based on the anthropological
More informationHamletmachine: The Objective Real and the Subjective Fantasy. Heiner Mueller s play Hamletmachine focuses on Shakespeare s Hamlet,
Tom Wendt Copywrite 2011 Hamletmachine: The Objective Real and the Subjective Fantasy Heiner Mueller s play Hamletmachine focuses on Shakespeare s Hamlet, especially on Hamlet s relationship to the women
More informationExcerpt: Karl Marx's Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts
Excerpt: Karl Marx's Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/epm/1st.htm We shall start out from a present-day economic fact. The worker becomes poorer the
More informationMedieval Art. artwork during such time. The ivory sculpting and carving have been very famous because of the
Ivory and Boxwood Carvings 1450-1800 Medieval Art Ivory and boxwood carvings 1450 to 1800 have been one of the most prized medieval artwork during such time. The ivory sculpting and carving have been very
More informationPlato s work in the philosophy of mathematics contains a variety of influential claims and arguments.
Philosophy 405: Knowledge, Truth and Mathematics Spring 2014 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #3 - Plato s Platonism Sample Introductory Material from Marcus and McEvoy, An Historical Introduction
More informationThe Pure Concepts of the Understanding and Synthetic A Priori Cognition: the Problem of Metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason and a Solution
The Pure Concepts of the Understanding and Synthetic A Priori Cognition: the Problem of Metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason and a Solution Kazuhiko Yamamoto, Kyushu University, Japan The European
More informationCRITICAL CONTEXTUAL EMPIRICISM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS
48 Proceedings of episteme 4, India CRITICAL CONTEXTUAL EMPIRICISM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION Sreejith K.K. Department of Philosophy, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India sreejith997@gmail.com
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 26 Lecture - 26 Karl Marx Historical Materialism
More informationMarx s Capital. Sixth Edition. Ben Fine and Alfredo Saad-Filho
Marx s Capital Marx s Capital Sixth Edition Ben Fine and Alfredo Saad-Filho First published 1975; this edition published 2016 by Pluto Press, 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA www.plutobooks.com Copyright
More informationRethinking the Aesthetic Experience: Kant s Subjective Universality
Spring Magazine on English Literature, (E-ISSN: 2455-4715), Vol. II, No. 1, 2016. Edited by Dr. KBS Krishna URL of the Issue: www.springmagazine.net/v2n1 URL of the article: http://springmagazine.net/v2/n1/02_kant_subjective_universality.pdf
More informationCurrent Issues in Pictorial Semiotics
Current Issues in Pictorial Semiotics Course Description What is the systematic nature and the historical origin of pictorial semiotics? How do pictures differ from and resemble verbal signs? What reasons
More informationA Process of the Fusion of Horizons in the Text Interpretation
A Process of the Fusion of Horizons in the Text Interpretation Kazuya SASAKI Rikkyo University There is a philosophy, which takes a circle between the whole and the partial meaning as the necessary condition
More informationANALYSIS OF THE PREVAILING VIEWS REGARDING THE NATURE OF THEORY- CHANGE IN THE FIELD OF SCIENCE
ANALYSIS OF THE PREVAILING VIEWS REGARDING THE NATURE OF THEORY- CHANGE IN THE FIELD OF SCIENCE Jonathan Martinez Abstract: One of the best responses to the controversial revolutionary paradigm-shift theory
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION MICROSOFT CORP., ET AL., v. COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL
More informationREVIEW ARTICLE IDEAL EMBODIMENT: KANT S THEORY OF SENSIBILITY
Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 7, no. 2, 2011 REVIEW ARTICLE IDEAL EMBODIMENT: KANT S THEORY OF SENSIBILITY Karin de Boer Angelica Nuzzo, Ideal Embodiment: Kant
More informationHOW SHOULD WE UNDERSTAND Marx s relation
81 In this article the author argues that the dialectic of Hegel and the dialectic of Marx are the same. The mysticism that Marx and many Marxists have imputed to Hegel s dialectic is shown to be mistaken.
More information