BBU threshold current study for 6 GeV beam in 12 GeV beamline setup

Similar documents
TITLE PAGE. Title of paper: PUSH-PULL FEL, A NEW ERL CONCEPT Author: Andrew Hutton. Author Affiliation: Jefferson Lab. Requested Proceedings:

THE JLAB 12 GEV ENERGY UPGRADE OF CEBAF *

Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation

ILC-LNF TECHNICAL NOTE

High Brightness Injector Development and ERL Planning at Cornell. Charlie Sinclair Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics

Upgrade of CEBAF to 12 GeV

Basic rules for the design of RF Controls in High Intensity Proton Linacs. Particularities of proton linacs wrt electron linacs

Status of SOLARIS Arkadiusz Kisiel

5 Project Costs and Schedule

Jefferson Lab Experience with Beam Halo, Beam Loss, etc.

News from HZB / BESSY Wolfgang Anders at ESLS-RF Meeting September 2010 Trieste

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)525. The RF system for FCC-ee. A. Butterworth CERN 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

3 cerl. 3-1 cerl Overview. 3-2 High-brightness DC Photocathode Gun and Gun Test Beamline

Suggested ILC Beam Parameter Range Rev. 2/28/05 Tor Raubenheimer

An Operational Diagnostic Complement for Positrons at CEBAF/JLab

ESS Linac WP8 Radio Frequency Systems and Test Facilities

Status of SOLARIS. Paweł Borowiec On behalf of Solaris Team

Introduction: CW SRF linac types, requirements and challenges High power RF system architecture

CEBAF Accelerator Update. Michael Tiefenback CASA Accelerator Physics Experimental Liaison June 14, 2017

RF Upgrades & Experience At JLab. Rick Nelson

Oak Ridge Spallation Neutron Source Proton Power Upgrade Project and Second Target Station Project

SRS and ERLP developments. Andrew moss

JEFFERSON LAB, A STATUS REPORT*

PEP II Design Outline

Present Status and Future Upgrade of KEKB Injector Linac

Availability and Reliability Issues for the ILC

RF Power Klystrons & 20 Year Look. R. Nelson 7/15/15

Upgrading LHC Luminosity

Commissioning of Accelerators. Dr. Marc Munoz (with the help of R. Miyamoto, C. Plostinar and M. Eshraqi)

12GeV CEBAF Commissioning

FINAL DESIGN OF ILC RTML EXTRACTION LINE FOR SINGLE STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR

Tutorial: Trak design of an electron injector for a coupled-cavity linear accelerator

CEBAF 12GeV Commissioning: Status and Plans

The Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation

ESS Linac WP8 Radio Frequency Systems and Test Facilities

DELIVERY RECORD. Location: Ibaraki, Japan

Linac upgrade plan using a C-band system for SuperKEKB

Extraction/Separator Setup. Michael Spata Operations Stay Treat July 16, 2015

Status of BESSY II and berlinpro. Wolfgang Anders. Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin for Materials and Energy (HZB) 20th ESLS-RF Meeting

STATUS AND COMMISSIONING RESULTS OF THE R&D ERL AT BNL*

Particle and Ray Tracing Codes (PARMILA & TURTLE Introduction)

Summary report on synchronization, diagnostics and instrumentation

2 Work Package and Work Unit descriptions. 2.8 WP8: RF Systems (R. Ruber, Uppsala)

COMMISSIONING SCENARIOS FOR THE J-PARC ACCELERATOR COMPLEX

The SPL at CERN. slhc. 1. Introduction 2. Description. 3. Status of the SPL study. - Stage 1: Linac4 - Stage 2: LP-SPL - Potential further stages

Magnetized-Beam Formation and Beam-Beam Kicker for Electron Cooling

Production of quasi-monochromatic MeV photon in a synchrotron radiation facility

ANKA RF System - Upgrade Strategies

LLRF at SSRF. Yubin Zhao

Diamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes

The ESS Accelerator. For Norwegian Industry and Research. Oslo, 24 Sept Håkan Danared Deputy Head Accelerator Division Group Leader Beam Physics

Beam Losses During LCLS Injector Phase-1 1 Operation

High Rep Rate Guns: FZD Superconducting RF Photogun

Workshop on Accelerator Operations August 6-10, 2012 Glen D. Johns Accelerator Operations Manager

Technology Challenges for SRF Guns as ERL Source in View of BNL Work

Top-Up Experience at SPEAR3

Report on the LCLS Injector Technical Review

A Cathode Development Cornell Cultera This scope includes all labor and purchases required produce photocathodes required by CBETA.

Dark current and multipacting trajectories simulations for the RF Photo Gun at PITZ

Energy Upgrade Options for the LCLS-I Linac

IOT OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE ON ALICE AND EMMA AT DARESBURY LABORATORY

Electron linac photo-fission driver for rare isotope program at TRIUMF

EPICS-based control system for compact-erl and ibnct

Empirical Model For ESS Klystron Cathode Voltage

STATUS OF THE EUROPEAN XFEL CONSTRUCTING THE 17.5 GEV SUPERCONDUCTING LINEAR ACCELERATOR

LCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems

A New High Intensity Proton Source. The SCRF Proton Driver. (and more!) at Fermilab. July 15, Bill Foster SRF2005

HIGH-INTENSITY PROTON BEAMS AT CERN AND THE SPL STUDY

The LEP Superconducting RF System

JLab 10kW FEL Driver Beam Diagnostics

LSD Review December 2012 Schedule, Re-Baseline, & Resource Analysis

DESIGN OF 1.2-GEV SCL AS NEW INJECTOR FOR THE BNL AGS*

ARIEL Buildings Construction and Electron Linac Photo-Fission Driver for the Rare Isotope Program at TRIUMF

RF Power Upgrade at Jefferson Lab

KARA and FLUTE RF Overview/status

PRESENT STATUS OF J-PARC

Synchrotron Light Facility. Operation of ALBA RF. Angela Salom on behalf of RF team: Francis Perez, Bea Bravo and Jesus Ocampo

!"!3

STATUS OF THE SWISSFEL C-BAND LINEAR ACCELERATOR

SLAC R&D Program for a Polarized RF Gun

SUMMARY OF THE ILC R&D AND DESIGN

PEP-I1 RF Feedback System Simulation

CERN S PROTON SYNCHROTRON COMPLEX OPERATION TEAMS AND DIAGNOSTICS APPLICATIONS

NSLS-II RF Systems James Rose, Radio Frequency Group Leader PAC 2011

Production of accelerators and accelerator components in industry

RF Design of the LCLS Gun C.Limborg, Z.Li, L.Xiao, J.F. Schmerge, D.Dowell, S.Gierman, E.Bong, S.Gilevich February 9, 2005

Activities on FEL Development and Application at Kyoto University

Proceedings of the 1997 Workshop on RF Superconductivity, Abano Terme (Padova), Italy

TESLA FEL-Report

Start to End Simulations

EUROFEL-Report-2007-DS EUROPEAN FEL Design Study

CBETA Quarterly Report 7

PEP-II Overview & Ramp Down Plan. J. Seeman DOE PEP-II Ramp Down-D&D Review August 6-7, 2007

P. Adamson, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL 60510, USA. Abstract

PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Longitudinal phase space monitors for the ILC injectors and bunch compressors

Nick Walker DESY MAC

Status and Plans for PEP-II

SPEAR 3: Operations Update and Impact of Top-Off Injection

Status of Elettra, top-up and other upgrades

New Filling Pattern for SLS-FEMTO

Transcription:

BBU threshold current study for 6 GeV beam in 12 GeV beamline setup Ilkyoung Shin and Byung C. Yunn JLAB-TN-09-004 January 12, 2009 1. Introduction The study of BBU threshold current is done for a 6 GeV beam in a 12 GeV beamline because the beam of 6 GeV will be still needed after 12 GeV upgrade. In this work, instead of 6 GeV, 6.6 GeV are considered to compare three beamline setups which are 3-pass 6.6 GeV, 5-pass 6.6 GeV, and 5-pass 11 GeV. 2. Assumption and simplification in simulations The same assumptions, simplification, and treatment as in TN-04-035 and TN-07-069 are used in the simulations. Two interesting quantities are Q l =10 7 and R/Q = 82.5 Ohms. Only 1874 MHz mode is excited in cavities. The 7-cell cavity cryomodules are located at the 21 st ~ 25 th zones in the North linac and the 46 th ~50 th zones in the South linac. The 1874 MHz mode is excited in the 7-cell cavities. Threshold currents are calculated when Q l = 10 7 and R/Q = 83 Ohms. Only the 7-cell cavities are exited with the 1874 MHz mode in each threshold calculation while the other cavities give energy gains without excitation of the HOMs. DBA arc optics are used. The total recirculation path length is 6554(6549, 6547, 6546) RF wavelengths for the 1 st (2 nd, 3 rd, 4 th ) pass of the CEBAF accelerator. 1

3. Two beamline setup for 6 GeV The 12 GeV nominal beamline setup is 5-pass 11 GeV, and each linac has a 1.1 GeV energy gain. On the other hand, the 5-pass 4 GeV setup has a 0.4 GeV energy gain in each linac. 3.1. 3-pass 6 GeV setup 3 passes of the electron beam goes through 6 linacs. If the nominal energy gain of 12 GeV setup, which is 1.1 GeV, is taken into account, the total energy gain is 6.6 GeV. (Energy gain during 3-pass) = (energy gain in a linac) χ (number of linacs during 3-pass) 6.6 GeV = 1.1 GeV χ 6 linacs In this study, 3-pass 6 GeV will beam 3-pass 6.6 GeV. 3.2. 5-pass 6 GeV setup The 60% version of 12 GeV setup is the 5-pass 6.6 GeV setup. The energy gain in linacs and injection energy are reduced to 60% of the 12 GeV setup values. Energy gain during 5 pass = energy gain of 12 GeV nominal setup χ 6.6 GeV = 11 GeV χ As above, 5-pass 6 GeV means 5-pass 6.6 GeV. 3.3. Injection energy Injection energy satisfies the equation (Injection energy) = χ (energy gain of a linac). By substituting the actual values into the formula, injection energies are obtained. Injection energy for 4 GeV setup = Injection energy for 12 GeV setup = χ 400 MeV = 45 MeV χ 1.1 GeV = 123 MeV 2

4. Simulation results 4.1. 3-pass 6.6 GeV Threshold current = 0.537 ma, Injection energy = 123 MeV Figure 1. 3 pass 6.6 GeV 4.2. 5-pass 6.6 GeV Threshold current 0.131 MeV, Injection energy = 73 MeV Figure 2. 5 pass 6.6 GeV 3

4.3. 5-pass 12 GeV This work is done in TN-08-069. Threshold current 0.219 ma, Injection energy 123 MeV Figure 3. 5 pass 12 GeV 5. Comparison of threshold currents with 3-pass and 5-pass setups The simulation results are summarized in the table. 3-pass 6.6 GeV 5-pass 6.6 GeV 5-pass 11 GeV Threshold current 0.537 ma 0.131 ma 0.219 ma Injection energy 123 MeV 73 MeV 123 MeV Table 1. Simulation results The threshold current for the 3-pass 6.6 GeV is greater than for the 5-pass 6.6 GeV. Let us compare the 5-pass 6.6 GeV with the 5-pass 12 GeV. As the beam energy is reduced from 11 GeV to 6.6 GeV, which is 60% reduction, the threshold current and injection energy are also decreased to approximately 60%. The threshold current is proportional to the injection energy while the number of pass is fixed. 4

6. Availability of the maximum current The maximum beam current is limited by the beam dump power. (Beam dump power) (maximum beam current) χ (maximum beam energy e) Applying the maximum beam dump power, 1 MW, to the formula gives 1 MW 0.151 ma χ 6.6 GeV e We have maximum beam current of 0.151 ma. The table below shows the maximum beam current and the threshold currents of the 6.6 GeV setup. Maximum beam current by beam dump power Threshold current for 3-pass 6.6 GeV Threshold current for 5-pass 6.6 GeV 0.151 ma 0.537 ma 0.131 ma Table 2. Comparison of threshold currents with maximum available beam current The maximum beam current is not available in the 5-pass 6.6 GeV setup because the threshold current, 0.131 ma, is less than the maximum beam current, 0.151 ma. Maximum beam current is available for the 3-pass 6.6 GeV setup. 7. Conclusions The threshold current for three setups are: 3-pass 6.6 GeV 5-pass 6.6 GeV 5-pass 11 GeV Threshold current 0.537 ma 0.131 ma 0.219 ma Table 3 Threshold current for three setups The threshold current is proportional to the injection energy at the same number of passes. Therefore, the threshold current for the 5-pass 6 GeV setup will be a factor of 0.55 for 5-pass 11 GeV setup. The maximum beam current is not available in the 5-pass 6.6 GeV setup. 8. Acknowledgement Thanks a lot to Ryan Bodenstein. 5