Station-100. From its Definition to its Realization both in the Tunnel and Outside. 05/05/05 Catherine LeCocq STA

Similar documents
Preliminary Layout for LCLS. Direction Stake-out

Summer / Fall 2004 Downtime AEG Preparation Work

LCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems

A Facility for Accelerator Physics and Test Beam Experiments

Electron Bypass Line (EBL) Design Electrons to A-line bypassing LCLS T. Fieguth, R. Arnold

Requirements for the Beam Abort Magnet and Dump

SABER A Facility for Accelerator Physics and Test Beam Experiments Roger Erickson SABER Workshop March 15, 2006

SLAC ILC Accelerator R&D Program

LCLS Injector Technical Review

P. Emma, et al. LCLS Operations Lectures

PEP-II Overview & Ramp Down Plan. J. Seeman DOE PEP-II Ramp Down-D&D Review August 6-7, 2007

Proceedings of the 1972 Proton Linear Accelerator Conference, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA ALIGNMENT PHILOSOPHY, DESIGN AND TECHNIQUES USED AT LAMPF*

PEP II Design Outline

Future Performance of the LCLS

Week 0: PPS Certification and Processing. Mon Feb 11 Tue Feb 12 Wed Feb 13 Thu Feb 14 Fri Feb 15 Sat Feb 16 Sun Feb 17

Upgrading LHC Luminosity

Tolerances on Magnetic Misalignments in SESAME Storage Ring

PEP-II IR-2 Alignment

Oak Ridge Spallation Neutron Source Proton Power Upgrade Project and Second Target Station Project

Energy Upgrade Options for the LCLS-I Linac

Top-Up Experience at SPEAR3

STATUS OF THE SWISSFEL C-BAND LINEAR ACCELERATOR

PEP II STATUS AND PLANS *

. SLAC-P~ December 1995

PEP-II Disassembly Technical Systems

Linac 4 Instrumentation K.Hanke CERN

DEVELOPMENT OF A 10 MW SHEET BEAM KLYSTRON FOR THE ILC*

PEP II Status and Plans

Next Linear Collider. The 8-Pack Project. 8-Pack Project. Four 50 MW XL4 X-band klystrons installed on the 8-Pack

Availability and Reliability Issues for the ILC

Status of CTF3. G.Geschonke CERN, AB

Program Risks Risk Analysis Fallback Plans for the. John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006

Tutorial: Trak design of an electron injector for a coupled-cavity linear accelerator

Scavenger Extraction. Karen Goldsmith Shawn Alverson

SLAC ILC program, International BDS Design, ATF2 facility

Advanced Photon Source - Upgrades and Improvements

CLEX (CLIC Experimental Area)

RF considerations for SwissFEL

Preparations for Installation, Testing and Commissioning based on Experience at CERN, SNS and Siemens

Accelerator Instrumentation RD. Monday, July 14, 2003 Marc Ross

Towards an X-Band Power Source at CERN and a European Structure Test Facility

Status and Plans for PEP-II

Beam Losses During LCLS Injector Phase-1 1 Operation

Development of Multiple Beam Guns for High Power RF Sources for Accelerators and Colliders

The PEFP 20-MeV Proton Linear Accelerator

30 GHz Power Production / Beam Line

RADIATION SAFETY SYSTEM OF THE B-FACTORY AT THE STANFORD LINEAR ACCELERATOR CENTER

Diamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes

A Novel Wire Scanner for High Intensity Pulsed Beams *

AREAL- Phase 1. B. Grigoryan on behalf of AREAL team

Periodic Seasonal Variation of Magnets Level of the STB ring

Workshop on Accelerator Operations August 6-10, 2012 Glen D. Johns Accelerator Operations Manager

US-ILC Waveguide Industrialization Study. Marc Ross, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen

PEP-II STATUS REPORT *

TWO BUNCHES WITH NS-SEPARATION WITH LCLS*

4.4 Injector Linear Accelerator

Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation

THE OPERATION OF A CATHODE RAY TUBE

First Simultaneous Top-up Operation of Three Different Rings in KEK Injector Linac

Detailed Design Report

RF Design of the LCLS Gun C.Limborg, Z.Li, L.Xiao, J.F. Schmerge, D.Dowell, S.Gierman, E.Bong, S.Gilevich February 9, 2005

Physics Requirements for the CXI Ion Time-of-Flight

Focus of efforts. ILC 2010, Mar/27/10 A. Seryi, BDS: 2

Status of SOLARIS Arkadiusz Kisiel

CHAPTER 3 OSCILLOSCOPES AND SIGNAL GENERATOR

Present Status and Future Upgrade of KEKB Injector Linac

Status of BESSY II and berlinpro. Wolfgang Anders. Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin for Materials and Energy (HZB) 20th ESLS-RF Meeting

LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Diagnostics and Controls

STATUS OF THE EUROPEAN XFEL CONSTRUCTING THE 17.5 GEV SUPERCONDUCTING LINEAR ACCELERATOR

LCLS-II Injector Tuning Procedures. F. Zhou (SLAC) & F. Sannibale (LBNL) 2/6/2017

Design Studies For The LCLS 120 Hz RF Gun Injector

INSTRUMENT CATHODE-RAY TUBE

PRESENT STATUS OF J-PARC

Current status of XFEL/SPring-8 project and SCSS test accelerator

RSH27 Nixie Tube Socket with LED

THE OPERATION OF A CATHODE RAY TUBE

HIGH POWER BEAM DUMP AND TARGET / ACCELERATOR INTERFACE PROCEDURES *

Status of Elettra, top-up and other upgrades

FINAL DESIGN OF ILC RTML EXTRACTION LINE FOR SINGLE STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR

Extraction/Separator Setup. Michael Spata Operations Stay Treat July 16, 2015

The Construction Status of CSNS Linac

Monthly Progress Report Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory

SPEAR 3: Operations Update and Impact of Top-Off Injection

Quad-to-quad correlated motion in FLASH

Radiation containment at a1mwhigh energy electron accelerator:

The Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation

Teltron Delection Tube D

Thoughts on Project Standard in Japan

DELIVERY RECORD. Location: Ibaraki, Japan

The ESS Accelerator. For Norwegian Industry and Research. Oslo, 24 Sept Håkan Danared Deputy Head Accelerator Division Group Leader Beam Physics

ESS: The Machine. Bucharest, 24 April Håkan Danared Deputy Head Accelerator Division. H. Danared Industry & Partner Days Bucharest Page 1

THE OPERATION EXPERIENCE AT KOMAC*

Technology Challenges for SRF Guns as ERL Sources in View of Rossendorf work

Digital BPMs and Orbit Feedback Systems

WHAT IS NEW AT CERN?

Riccardo Farinelli. Charge Centroid Feasibility

Low-Energy Electron Linacs and Their Applications in Cargo Inspection

Results of Vibration Study for LCLS-II Construction in FEE, Hutch 3 LODCM and M3H 1

Suggested ILC Beam Parameter Range Rev. 2/28/05 Tor Raubenheimer

Start to End Simulations

Transcription:

Station-100 From its Definition to its Realization both in the Tunnel and Outside

Definition The 2 mile SLAC linac is actually 10000 ft. It was designed with a downward slope heading eastward. In its middle, the slope of the accelerator with respect to the local gravity vector is 5 mrad. All the designs of the accelerator have been made in this pitched system which is called the linac system. The z axis is the accelerator tube axis and the origin is at the beginning of the accelerator. The y axis is perpendicular to the z axis pointing up in the plane of the accelerator and the gravity vector at the middle. The x axis just completes the system to make it Right Handed. Instead of using the z coordinate as is, tradition asks for a station position along the accelerator: Station-100 = 100+00 = (z=10000ft) The linac is divided into 30 sectors. So a sector is 333.333 ft long. There are marks on the floor to indicate the beginning of each sector: Station-100 floor marker = tunnel brass plate 31

In the LinacTunnel Station-100 linac floor marker

LCLS Undulator Coordinate System E. Bong, P. Emma, C. LeCocq, T. Montagne, J. Welch LCLS-TN-03-8, April 16, 2004 0.476 %Nominal Slope of linac at Station-100 Definition of Station-100 10000ft=3048m Values adopted for SLC R = 6372508.025m MSL=77.643680m

How to Access this Information at the Surface Level During the linac construction, it was well thought of and a new set of brass plates were installed in the klystron gallery. During PEP construction, a set of 8 monuments were established (see PEP Site Survey by the National Geodetic Survey also known PTM #85 R1). None of these marks have been used recently. During the SLC construction, a set of 7 pillars and 5 other markers were installed around the campus and observed by a combination of theodolites, distancemeters and GPS observations: http://www-group.slac.stanford.edu/met/align/gps/gps_site_network.html In the Research Yard, within the FFTB tunnel, the ESA and ESB buildings.

In the Klystron Gallery Typical Section of Klystron Gallery and 6 10 Accelerator Housing Brass Plate Alignment Reference Mark (6 x 4 ) Center Line Klystron Gallery Looking East SLAC Drawing # SK - GE 5153 - A Accelerator Service Shaft 1 9 Center Line Accelerator Housing linac z axis 1 7 Accelerator Tube 2 9 Brass Plate Alignment Reference Mark (6 x 4 )

Station-100 In the linac system: Station-100 is: z=10000 x=0 y=0 Station-100 floor marker is: z=10000 x=-4 4 Station-100 klystron gallery marker is: z=10000 x=7 The transformation from the linac system to a leveled coordinate system centered at Station-100 is given by Z = cos(s 100 ) (z-z 100 ) + sin(s 100 ) y where s 100 =0.00476 rad. Station-100 is: Z=0 X=0 Y=0 Station-100 floor marker is: Z = -0.0092m assuming that the floor is about 1.9m down from the beam. This value of -9.2mm was entered without its sign in the alignment database. A memo dated 10/30/91 states this fact and outlined its impact on the new FFTB magnet locations. The main consequence is that the SLC coordinate system origin has its origin shifted improperly 18.4mm. One should be reminded too that the slope of the linac at Station-100 was chosen as -0.474% by the SLC designers instead of the -0.476% value for the linac design.

So Where is Station-100 in the Tunnel? During the Summer Downtime of 2004, AEG performed a specific survey in the area of Station-100 in order to get the as-built positions of quads 50Q1, 50Q2 and 50Q3 as well as bend 50B1. There are no fiducials on these quads, so center positions were obtained by a combination of surface shots and as-built dimensions. The adjustment was carried out in the SLC monuments system. Later the results were expressed in the pitched linac system using the nominal pitch value for the accelerator at Station-100, i.e. -0.00476 rad. Pitched Linac SLC Monument System Z (m) X (m) Y (m) Z (m) X (m) Y (m) 50Q1M -1.84120-0.00116 0.00093 89998.15883 69999.99884 2077.65339 50Q2M 14.31535-0.00093 0.00085 90014.31519 69999.99907 2077.57641 50Q3M 18.82622-0.00012 0.00109 90018.82601 69999.99988 2077.55518 50B1M 20.88911-0.00129 0.00136 90020.88888 69999.99871 2077.54563 JP30_8* -15.12174-0.42367-0.25295 89984.87723 69999.57634 2077.46273 JP30_9* -2.77286-0.42462-0.25398 89997.22596 69999.57538 2077.40292 Sta100M 0.01806-1.32608-1.67538 90000.01008 69998.67392 2075.96825 * The x offset for the jack point fixture is 16.635

2004 AEG Tunnel Analysis X Analysis The brass plate marker of Station-100 is measured at -1.32608 m. The design value as indicated in the drawing SK-GE-5153 A is 4 4, leading to a difference of about 5 mm. The previous local survey was made on January 1997. Here is a summary table of the x position in mm: Q1 Q2 Q3 JP8 JP9 1997-1.1-1.0-0.3-1.1-2.1 2004-1.1-0.9-0.1-1.1-2.1 Z Analysis In the note LCLS-TN-03-8, two values are quoted from the deck : Station-100 to Q1-1.85754 m Station-100 to Q2 14.32508 m The numbers from the previous slide are referring to Station-100 implied in the monument coordinates, i.e. the one used for SLC. They must then be shifted by -18.4mm as indicated in the 10/30/91 alignment memo: Station-100 to Q1-1.84120-0.0184 = -1.85754 m Station-100 to Q2 14.32508-0.0184 = 14.32508 m The comparison of these two sets of numbers show a discrepancy of about 2 mm for Q1 and 28 mm for Q2. The same alignment memo states that In October 1984, Q2 was moved upstream 2.5 cm because of mechanical interference with its installation. With this in mind the 2004 measured z positions for Q1 and Q2 are respectively 2 mm and 3 mm upstream. Because of the choice of instrumentation, the limited geometry for the resections, the absence of fiducials on the quads and the difficulty to center on a mark on a brass plate, 0.5mm is a reasonable guess for the RMS on these z measurements.

2004 AEG Work for LCLS Layout Because of our GPS base station, AEG is now able to produce State Plane Coordinates for all outside work on the SLAC site: http://www-group.slac.stanford.edu/met/align/gps/gps_intro.html A transformation between SLAC and State grid has been established based on the following points: Klystron gallery brass plates for sectors 1, 2, 3, 21, 28, 29, 30 M20 under metallic tower SLC pillars: AAA, M32, M33, M36, M40, M41 Research yard points: SPPS010, 020, 040, 060, 070, 080, 090 http://www-group.slac.stanford.edu/met/align/lcls/lcls.html

SLAC-State Grid Transformation http://www-group.slac.stanford.edu/met/align/techanalysis/2004/lcls_direction_layout_partii.pdf Z ZM40 X XM40 = k cos α sin α - sin α cos α E EM40 N NM40 ZM40 = 60.54993 m α = 7.498092 EM40 = 1849150.024 m XM40 = -2.41764 m k = 1.000055 NM40 = 603088.745 m E EM40 N NM40 cos α -sin α sin α cos α = k -1 Z ZM40 X XM40 N.B. This model has been designed for general mapping purposes. It is a cm transformation.

So Where is Station-100 in the Open?