LASERTRON SIMULATION WITH A TWO-GAP OUTPUT CAVITY*

Similar documents
Lecture 17 Microwave Tubes: Part I

A HIGH POWER LONG PULSE HIGH EFFICIENCY MULTI BEAM KLYSTRON

PEP-I1 RF Feedback System Simulation

45 MW, 22.8 GHz Second-Harmonic Multiplier for High-Gradient Tests*

4.4 Injector Linear Accelerator

NEW METHOD FOR KLYSTRON MODELING

RF Power Generation II

Detailed Design Report

DEVELOPMENT OF X-BAND KLYSTRON TECHNOLOGY AT SLAC

LCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems

DEVELOPMENT OF A 10 MW SHEET BEAM KLYSTRON FOR THE ILC*

This work was supported by FINEP (Research and Projects Financing) under contract

IOT OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE ON ALICE AND EMMA AT DARESBURY LABORATORY

RF Solutions for Science.

PEP II Design Outline

Design and Simulation of High Power RF Modulated Triode Electron Gun. A. Poursaleh

The PEFP 20-MeV Proton Linear Accelerator

KLYSTRON GUN ARCING AND MODULATOR PROTECTION

w. B. HERRMANNSFELDT and K. R. EPPLEY

SLAC R&D Program for a Polarized RF Gun

INFN School on Electron Accelerators. RF Power Sources and Distribution

North Damping Ring RF

A SHEET-BEAM KLYSTRON PAPER DESIGN

Empirical Model For ESS Klystron Cathode Voltage

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF L-BAND AND S-BAND MULTI BEAM KLYSTRONS

Diamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes

Photo cathode RF gun -

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION Multi-beam S-band Klystron type BT267

CHAPTER 4: HIGH ENERGY X-RAY GENERATORS: LINEAR ACCELERATORS. Jason Matney, MS, PhD

The Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation

The FLASH objective: SASE between 60 and 13 nm

Development of klystrons with ultimately high - 90% RF power production efficiency

THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER TEST ACCELERATOR: STATUS AND RESULTS * Abstract

Performance of a DC GaAs photocathode gun for the Jefferson lab FEL

Linac 4 Instrumentation K.Hanke CERN

Evaluation of Performance, Reliability, and Risk for High Peak Power RF Sources from S-band through X-band for Advanced Accelerator Applications

Development of Multiple Beam Guns for High Power RF Sources for Accelerators and Colliders

Pulsed Klystrons for Next Generation Neutron Sources Edward L. Eisen - CPI, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA

These tests will be repeated for different anode positions. Radiofrequency interaction measurements will be made subsequently. A.

A Unique Power Supply for the PEP II Klystron at SLAC*

Phase (deg) Phase (deg) Positive feedback, 317 ma. Negative feedback, 330 ma. jan2898/1638: beam pseudospectrum around 770*frev.

Design, Fabrication and Testing of Gun-Collector Test Module for 6 MW Peak, 24 kw Average Power, S-Band Klystron

IOT RF Power Sources for Pulsed and CW Linacs

POLARIZED LIGHT SOURCES FOR PHOTOCATHODE ELECTRON GUNS AT SLAC?

Towards an X-Band Power Source at CERN and a European Structure Test Facility

Pseudospark-sourced Micro-sized Electron Beams for High Frequency klystron Applications

High Brightness Injector Development and ERL Planning at Cornell. Charlie Sinclair Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics

Pulses inside the pulse mode of operation at RF Gun

Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation

Low-Energy Electron Linacs and Their Applications in Cargo Inspection

High-power klystrons. The benchmark in scientific research. State-of-the-art RF sources for your accelerator

!"!3

RF considerations for SwissFEL

150-MW S-Band Klystron Program at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center1

X-Band Klystron Development at

RF plans for ESS. Morten Jensen. ESLS-RF 2013 Berlin

Klystron Tubes. Two forms of such a device, also called linear beam klystron, are given in the following figure.

TITLE PAGE. Title of paper: PUSH-PULL FEL, A NEW ERL CONCEPT Author: Andrew Hutton. Author Affiliation: Jefferson Lab. Requested Proceedings:

TWO BUNCHES WITH NS-SEPARATION WITH LCLS*

Development of High Power Vacuum Tubes for Accelerators and Plasma Heating

2 Work Package and Work Unit descriptions. 2.8 WP8: RF Systems (R. Ruber, Uppsala)

INTRODUCTION. SLAC-PUB-8414 March 2000

Tutorial: Trak design of an electron injector for a coupled-cavity linear accelerator

SRS and ERLP developments. Andrew moss

Studies on an S-band bunching system with hybrid buncher

EPJ Web of Conferences 95,

DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF KLYSTRON DEVELOPMENT

New Filling Pattern for SLS-FEMTO

Activities on FEL Development and Application at Kyoto University

SLAC-PUB-2380 August 1979 (A)

RF POWER GENERATION FOR FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDERS* 1. Introduction

OF THIS DOCUMENT IS W8.MTO ^ SF6

Advanced Test Equipment Rentals ATEC (2832)

UNIT-3 Part A. 2. What is radio sonde? [ N/D-16]

ILC Damping Ring Lattice Status Report. Louis Emery and Aimin Xiao Argonne National Laboratory Presented at KEK workshop Dec 18th, 2007

III. Proton-therapytherapy. Rome SB - 3/5 1

KARA and FLUTE RF Overview/status

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice

CHAPTER 3 OSCILLOSCOPES AND SIGNAL GENERATOR

HIGH-GRADIENT ELECTRON ACCELERATOR POWERED BY A RELATIVISTIC KLYSTRON*

* Work supported by Department of Energy contract DE-AC03-76SF RF Pulse Compression. for F'uture Linear Colliders* SLAC-PUB

CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3

... A COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR MULTIPARAMETER PULSE HEIGHT ANALYSIS AND CONTROL*

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (IJECET)

Dark current and multipacting trajectories simulations for the RF Photo Gun at PITZ

Status of the Jefferson Lab Polarized Beam Physics Program and Preparations for Upcoming Parity Experiments

CERN S PROTON SYNCHROTRON COMPLEX OPERATION TEAMS AND DIAGNOSTICS APPLICATIONS

The SLAC Polarized Electron Source *

Jefferson Lab Experience with Beam Halo, Beam Loss, etc.

PRESENT STATUS OF J-PARC

TESLA FEL-Report

RECENT PROGRESS IN UPGRADE OF THE HIGH INTENSITY THzzz zz-fel AT OzSAKzA UNIVERSITYzzzz

LCLS Injector Technical Review

CATHODE RAY OSCILLOSCOPE (CRO)

Proton Engineering Frontier Project

Production of quasi-monochromatic MeV photon in a synchrotron radiation facility

RX40_V1_0 Measurement Report F.Faccio

Electrical and Electronic Laboratory Faculty of Engineering Chulalongkorn University. Cathode-Ray Oscilloscope (CRO)

Available online Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2018, 5(5): Research Article

RF Design of the LCLS Gun C.Limborg, Z.Li, L.Xiao, J.F. Schmerge, D.Dowell, S.Gierman, E.Bong, S.Gilevich February 9, 2005

Transcription:

SLAC/AP-41 April 1985 CAP) LASERTRON SMULATON WTH A TWO-GAP OUTPUT CAVTY* W. B. Herrmannsfeldt Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 Abstract: With a two-gap output cavity, it is shown here that TME=3,501E-09 STEP= 2560 SPECE= 1 4 80@ 453 kev 341 kev 236 kev 143 kev 66 kev 0.80 0.020 0.054 0.089 0.123 0 158 0 192. * 18 kev Xl POSTON (10*t 0) high rf efficiency, up to about 70%, is possible for the parameters planned for the SLAC lasertron experiment: 400 kv, 50 MW, 2856 MHz. Simulation: To get the reader used to looking at MASK output, am going to tell the story in pictures. The vertical scale is longitudinal momentum, units Of &c. The corresponding drift energies are shown on the right side. The horizontal scale is meters; the photo cathode is at 0.0 and the collector is at 0.192 m. There are 256 time steps per rf cycle. * Work supported by the Department of Energy, contract DE-AC03-76SF00515.

Each picture corresponds to a 45' phase advance. We will show a complete rf cycle in eight steps. When you compare pictures, be warned that the scales will change. The dots are macro particles that are being followed from photo cathode to collector.. Here we see four pulses. n the lower left corner, a new pulse is just being emitted. The previous pulse, at the top, has just left the accelerating region of the diode. The pulse in the upper right corner is between rf gaps. TME=3,545E-09 STEP= 2592 SPfCE= 1 5,009 4 000 000 00 \ 1 A 0.000 0.038 0.077 0.115 0.151 0.192 Xl POSTON (10X* 0) n the lower right corner; the last remnants of the fourth pulse is just going into the collector. -2-

Field nputs: On thisfigure we have located the position of the diode gap, from 0.0 to 33 mm, and the two rf gaps, each 21 mu wide, centered at 10.5 cm and 16.5 cm, respectively, from TME=3 58SE-09 STEP= 2524 S?EZZ= 1 7.50 6 or, 4 1 & 50 5 i- z3!2 0.006 105 mm 165 mm, :?$. 1 0.000 0.038 0.077 0.115 0.154 0 192 Xl POSTON (10tf 0) - the cathode. The voltage over the diode is 400 kv. n this simulation, the rf voltages are 300 kv and 400 kv over Gl and G respectively. The model for the two gap cavity is essentially t 2 e same as was used for the 150?lN klystron built at SLAC as part of the Japanese collaboration. (1) The double gap cavity operates in the HT mode, i.e., the rf phases are the same in both gaps. -3-

Pa&icle Dynamics: Here the new pulse has left the cathode, i.e., the laser is turned off. The preceeding pulse is just entering the region of 'gap Gl.- The next pulse is right over G2' Note that particles from the.pulse that was in the collector region on the first figure, are still being collected. n fact, we will see that we are collecting particles during each of the eight 45' intervals. n effect, we have converted 5 00 TME=3 632E-09 STEP= 2656 SPECE= 1 4 0 Gl G2._ 1 0.000 0 038 0,077 0.115 0 154 0. Xl POSTON (10t* 0) the pulsed beam to dc. Obviously, if we.extracted all of the rf modulation from the beam, we would have removed all of the possible rf energy, By adding up the energy that is collected during an rf cycle, and dividing by the rf period, we have a measurement of the Lost beam power. The difference between the input power and the collected power is the rf power. -4-

RF Phases: f you have been counting carefully you will note that we are now at the fourth step, that is, we are at 180' of the rf phase..we arbitrarily chose to start counting at O", and since the rf $ields follow a cosine law, 0' and 180' are the points of maximum field: 180' is the maximum decelerating field in the rf gaps. The two humps correspond to the middle of the gaps. Recall that the rf voltages are 300 kv and 400 kv, respectively. The vertical scale labelled El, is actually Dl. El FROM 12= OTO 1, CYCLE= 2588, TME= 3 676E-0 1.8069-1 701.L _LVV. 1-0.025 0.025 0.075 0.125 0.175 0 225 POSTON ALONG Xl (lbt% 0) f you divide by 8.854 x 10-12, you will have the electric fields, E, but note that the effects of local space charge is included. Tfie plot is the field on the axis of symmetry. -5- --

Momentum Control: The ideal klystron pulse is monochromatic at the output gap. By phasing the field at G1 a little bit early, we will in fact result in tippipg the momentum plot from the slope that is caused by space charge in the diode to one in which the trailing part of the pulse has higher momentum. We are also extracting some energy so that.lower fields are possible at the rf gaps. As the pulse drifts from TME=3 676E-09 STEP= 2688 SPECE= 1 4.80 -. --- 0 000 0.038 0.077 0.115 0.154 0.192 Xl POSTON (10%f 0) G1 to G2, the self forces will act to redistribute the momentum within the bunch. The results do not depend critically on the choice of rf phase and amplitude. For example, the same efficiency results if the voltage at G2 is only 300 kv, or if the phases are changed by a few degrees. -6-

-Collected Energy: The energy collected durinj4each of the 45' intervals is tabulated b,elow, (in units of 10 joules): nterval: 1 2 3 4 5 '6 7 8 End Wall: 16.,64 8.35 3.88 3.78 5.96 5.57 3.22. 4.13 Side Wall: 4.42.59 TME=3 720E-09 STEP= 2720 SFECE= 1 5.00 4. 1 0.00. 0.000 0.038 0.077 0.115 0.154 0.192 Xl POSTON (108% 0) ii The total collected energy is 0.005659 joules. Multiply by 2856 MHz and &he collected po-wer is 16.15-m. The input power is 5b MW, so the collected "efficiency" is about 32% and the rf efficiency is about 68%. The simulation is remarkably stable; subsequent cycles yield the same efficiency * 0.5%. -7-

Double Gaps: As we watch the rest of the rf cycle go past, we can contemplate (briefly) the virt?es of double gaps: 1) Efficiency... The best efficiency that we were able to get under these conditions with a single gap was about 50%. 2) Peak fields... Especially if the lasertron goes to higher voltage beams, the peak rf fields would become 6 75 TME=3.763E-09 STEP= 2752 S?ECE= 1 5 25-0.75 0.000 0.038 0.077 0.115 0.154 0 192 Xl POSTON (10*% 0) excessive unless multiple output gaps are used. 3) Control... Because the rf fields are lower, the beam is much more manageable. Although, some beam was collected on the wall in this run, the same efficiency was obtained with lower fields and no beam was lost on the wall. This is important for photo cathode lifetime. -8-

- Multiple gap output cavities and other extended interaction area systems have been used before (_1,2), The ex+rimental 150 MW tube achieved 43% efficiency with a single gap and 51% with the double gap. The increase in output power was almost 19%. TME=3 807E-09 STEP= 2784 SPECE= 1 5 009 4. 1. 0.00Q. 0.020 0.054 0.089 0.123 0.158 0.192 : Xl POSTON (108% 0) The design parameters for the output cavities, (frequency, Q and R/Q) can be determined from these MASK results using the klystron simulation version of MASK that Simon Yu developed (3). -9-

f you read with the speed of light, then we have been together now for 350 picoseconds. You can tell how the fields changed if you compare this sheet with the field, 180' back. El FROM 12= OTO 1, CYCLE= 2816, TME= 3 8S;E--0 0.00 POSTON ALONG Xl (10** 0) f two gaps are good, are even more gaps better? Not in this case b&cause there isn't much rf left in the beam, but perhaps for a higher Dower beam'more gaps would help. Would double gaps improve the efficiency for conventional klystrons. 7 We will look at using multiple gap. output cavities for the SLAC 50 MV klystron as part of our on-going simulation work. -lo-

t is interesting to compare the picture on this page with the plot on page 1, 360' back in time. Acknowledgment: Thanks to Terry Lee and Marvin Chodorow for helpful discussions. References: 1) Lee, Konrad, Okazaki, Watonabe and Yonezawa, The 150 MW Klystron Experiment, to be published in EE Transactions Plasma Science on High Power Microwave Generation. 4.80 TME=3.851E-09 STEP= 2816 SPECE= 1 4,00 0.8Q 0.054 0.089 Xl POSTON 0.123 0.158 <10** 0) 2) M. A. Allen, Coupling of MultiplelCavity Systems, Microwave Laboratory Report 584, Stanford University, April 1959. 3) S. Yu, Particle-in-Cell Simulation of High Power Klystrons, SLAC/AP-34, September 1984. -ll-